ri rpt, v2 - appendices (final) · 2019-06-14 · 1331 17th street, suite 1200 denver, colorado...
Post on 12-Aug-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
POOR LEGIBILITY
ONE OR MORE PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE DIFFICULT TO READ DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee
c
r c c,
C, C Q
C
City of Fresno Fresno Sanitary Landfill
Remedial Investigation Report Volume II - Appendices
May 20, 1994
SFUND RECORDS CTR
88111952
L j
City of Fresno Fresno Sanitary Landfill Remedial Investigation Report Volume II - Appendices
May 20, 1994
Prepared for:
City of Fresno 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, Califomia 93721
Prepared by:
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 300 Walnut Creek, Califomia 94596
and
1331 17th Street, Suite 1200 Denver, Colorado 80202
C D M Camp Dresser &. McKee
Contents — Volume II
Appendix A Site Geology A-1 Geophysical Logs A-2 Geologic Logs A-3 Grain-Size Distribution Curves
Appendix B Site Hydrology B-1 Well Completion Diagrams B-2 Regional Water Level Maps (1972-1992) B-3 Water Level Time Trends B-4 Irrigation Data B-5 Leachate Investigation Data B-6 Aquifer Test Evaluations
Appendix C
Appendix D
Soil Gas Model
Groundwater Model
C D M Camp Dresser &. McKee 2416-112\IM\RIRT\FINAUT0C-II 05/20/94 let
\ •' ", ,-T- A
>
13 .
jl,—,- ; •" • .. . I -
•?.*5-b''>-"'''V.''.
Site Geology
CDM Camp Dresser &. McKee
. . ' ·.~
·'· ,.·· (·.,
'I._::·,
' ' '.. : ~
.....
··J,'
"·.· ~ ,·
.., ... '
~. ' '
'~ '
' •I'
'.·.,. '•i ·.·..,
. ~l " .~·
\' :·' '' ·,··
,' .. ·'
r·,J
.:,·
\ · .. · :·.·, ·:·\ ,;'"!-·'/:.·
., .•. .!'
r· ·,
'·' '·
•,,.>.._
'; ::
·.~-, ' (. (
'' ~ ' .·: ..
'\ ~. ~' . '.
· ....
,· _,..}<·.::
. ~ ~ .,-.
l '
~ .::) .. .·.,.
•. _') ., • :. ··, .. ' l ' . •.' • '';. - ""'' . ~
. / . .' .-... 1',,
'.-~;: ::App~hd·ix :·A-:{:··,· .. :· .. ' '? :': e,¢¢PhY~!GetiJ-89$ ,
- .r· .. ~··· '-:·~:~-::.~~··'
In , ' ,, . '
·~·. :·,·. '. '
.·,. . ; ~ ;, ...... '
.. l· ..
. '',
'•
\ '.- ~ . .. _ .. ' ~~: . ·.:
,•
··' '
' '
• .r ·-~ ·, '.;'
)'·'
1 • ~~~' ~· r'•. I
f.:'."" j
y ; . ,•, .;
'. :. :·· ·' \
f' ·~-' .
.' ... -
· .. :,· ~ .,
..... ·-·
'-:'
·' ·'
.. . ~ ,~ ..
·' '!· <;>;····
.. 1- '11. ';\:
•,' •,,f.
·• \
' ,,-. ,~ j
. ,• '1 ·, ·. }. ~ ...
' r,
~ ·: : ' '·'
Natural Gamma Log CDM-1 Electric Well Log
Depth in
Feet
100
120
140
ICO
ISO
200
220
240
2SS
^1 • 1
i > .1 •••
::: • • .'i.':
> i
• - t' ::''. v^«,
, « i
• • • • i •**
....
.}} ' • • si
*. ' 1 ' \ '* T i
• • V
|[>
Natural Gamma Log C D M - 2 Electric Well Log
)epth in
Feet
i
Natural Gamma Log CDM-3 Electric Well Log
Depth in
Feet
+ 1
t tmn-n j% q (iMtt-n t-t
>Cl<Fl» H V K C g pin-n r ••
" " i fwil i ' .
Natural Gamma Log CDM-4 Electric Well Log
Natural Gamma Log CDM-5 Electric Well Log
Depth in
Feet
+ 9
n -.••it-ii , ' •
Natural Gamma Log CDM-6 Electric Well Log
3th
et r
Depth in
Feet
i ttUtUl
0
s r .:
(0
10O
120
KO
160
180
200
220
240
2S2
Natural Gamma Log CDM-7 Electric Well Log
·',• ·.,:r-·
' ',~;-!' ~-'
\'I >o'
''· ,_, ...... , "· ·;~---··.
. r;,!
' ~. /, . -...
.. . ~' ... '- ~.
·: ~'I I
"- ... ~--- l.
•• <
; ,,•,•
-~) -...
. . ',._ ~
·'·
_. __ ._._.
·.'
' \ --·~,
·'"'· l_r'_~-,. !!, } • ·'
·,....,
.~'-. t,'
... ., " , .. ~
'! ·,' -.. ··-
-~ .. -.. ·.,
! ' : .~ ··1
.. ' ·~ . '
···'"\!• .·"<,.;,
• L ri~rJI~~a~p·o~~sser :& ¥cK~i ~ : ~. : '• .._ ,~ "·.<- .•. ...:.~<:, ;~;,: ; .,~, I •'
c'
.,r-·
-~-i ·<,' '':..''
)'-•' ·' . . J ·:; .:
.~
.) ·.,.
f. '__!, -'· ~
·-'
. -.· ~. -' .
/',
'\.
·- .' . ~ ..
:_\ v.:·
' \ :·-.· '.""'.;
··-'' ";i' ..
~,A~p~11dl~,~~c~; , , .- ·-·. __ :_ G'f?qlo'gi_c:·. 4-o_g~ ::· .:-~ .
• j 1 c -, -~ •• : r -~· ) -
'-~·::.. . ' ' .j. - -~ •• ' .'' ·' ¥
.J,_. ,.,I'
;_.. -.. ·~-~ :-~ . -~. ~ "
r.-' - - . '·'- -~"' 1
:) •,1 ,·:·:..: _ ... :_.: ... _ •. ;J.' ..
.~ .• ·.t. ' V•
··~ .
'..: ...
'( ··; . ~ ..
,1
. ~.: .. •. ·-;.,'
''·' ;:_ ·::: •. ,_-_1'\"-_,,._;,:. '-:: _; ,_1,_ ••
'.··
•. _'_''."_', r ''·<~"~ __ , .. _';.· •• .. ·' !. • ~.
'''· ·,
'; ~ ' ., .""; ,-., ' .... : .\ i,
'..\ ·: ·>• .'
. ,
' . -~ -.\ _'
_;.<::J· ·, ''
' ........ ~ ~' ''\•r ',..._•'
. \·, "\. ...
·, '··
. •"-7"
.·. , .
. ,... '<_
.. -" t'''
~ •' ~,.l ..
. ~. .. .. ~ · ... --, /_
J ·~ ..·-'4 ) e
- - . ~ ., '
··, J .... (L
-•:=-- ~" 7 •• - ' .·
'·' .. :. . ·-'-~ h .
-::-'
·1
:·,~!_.:; I
.-l. J
i
' 1
-'I '"" • ., f.
' .. ,. _,: ~· :. '; ' .. ~ ... ',' ·.: :J· l.f"l
·,,.(:"·1'• .'· l
•'J • e '.,;.• '
:·'
\< '~ • )
',,...· .... _: • j
:. : '· .
BORING NO. CMW-1 PAGE 1 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: H O U O W AUGER
START DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 28.1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLIT BARREL WITH 2.5" SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER
DEPTH
- 0 -SAMPLE
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
- 3 5 •
SAMPLE NO,
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
LAB ANAL.
H
H
H
H
H
H
ORG. vAPon (PPM)
0
1-5
0.5
%Rec,
100
100
63
100
100
73
17
73
100
100
100
LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION WELL DATA
SILTY SAND, gray, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, darkly stained above 1 foot in depth
SANDY SILT, light green-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay, sandy laminations
SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, fine to medium-grained, some clay
SAND, light orange-gray, moist, dense, fine to medium-grained, some silt, trace clay
SANDY SILT, gray to tan, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay
SILTY SAND, brown-gray, moist, dense to very dense, very fine to fine-grained
SAND, light gray, moist to wet, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace silt
SAND, tight gray, wet, dense, fine to very coarse-grained
i
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-1 PAGE 2 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
i i i i i I
DEPTH
- 3 5 -3AM PLE
SAMPLE NO.
LAB ANAL.
ORG. VAPOR
% R E C , LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
SAND, light gray, wet, dense, fine to very coarse-grained
WELL DATA
40 —
(PPMJ
1 100
SILT, orange-gray, moist, hard, some very fine-grained sand and clay
008 H 100
100 SILTY SAND, orange-brown-gray, moist, very dense, very fine-grained, trace clay
009 H 100 45
SANDY SILT, olive-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay
50 —
55 —
60 —
65 —
- 7 0
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-2 PAGE 1 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW AUGER
START DATE: MARCH 2, 1992 COMPLETION DATE: MARCH 3, 1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLIT BARREL WITH 2.5" SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER
DEPTH
— 0 -SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO, LAB ANAL.
ORG, VAPOR
%REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS 6 IN.
GRAPH, ICLOG
WELL DATA
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30
001
002
003
004
005
006
- 3 5 ' 007
H
H
H
H
H
(PPM)
5 17
3.4
0.2
83
100
87
73
63
100
100
73
74
87
86
53
74
87
SILTY SAND, brown-gray, dry, very dense, fine-grained, some clay, blotchy color (fill)
SM
SILTY SAND, dark blue-gray, moist, dense, fine-grained, trace clay, porous, some rootlets
SM
24
SANDY SILT, green-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay, laminated
ML
SILTY SAND, olive-brown, moist to wet, fine to medium-grained, trace clay, laminated
from 10 lo 10.5 feet, interlaminated silt and silty sand, below 10.8 feet, orange-brown
SM
10
SANDY SILT, gray, moist, hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay
from 15.7 to 16.2 feet, silty sand
ML 50
SILTY SAND, gray, moist, dense, very tine to medium-grained
SM
SP
SAND, gray, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained, some silt and clay
at 24 feet, silty and cemented
32
SANDY SILT, olive-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay, cemented
ML
SILT, gray, dry, hard, some clay, cemented ML
30 SILTY SAND, light gray, dry, very dense, very , fine-grained, some clay y/^
SM ML
CLAYEY SILT, orange-gray, moist, hard, porous
SANDY SILT, green-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay ML 18
I I. :•: • 41 41 4 f 4
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-2 PAGE 2 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
I i i
i
I 1
I
t 1
I i 1 f
I 1
i i
I i I
DEPTH
-35-3AMPLE
SAMPLE NO.
LAB ANAL.
ORG. VAPOR % REC.
LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS 6 IN.
GRAPH IC LOG
WELL DATA
26
40 —
SANDY SILT, green-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay
008 H 100
SILTY SAND, green-gray, moist, very dense, very fine-grained, some clay, laminated, becomes less silty with depth
65 SILTY SAND, orange-brown to brown, moist, very dense, very fine to fine-grained
009 H 80
SAND, light brown to tan, moist, dense, very fine-grained, yellow stains
45
50 —
55 —
60 —
65 —
- 7 0
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-3 PAGE 1 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW AUGER
START DATE: FEBRUARY 26. 1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 27,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLIT BARREL WITH 2.5" SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER
i DEPTH
— 0 -SAMPLE
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
- 3 5 -
SAMPLE NO.
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
U B ANAL.
H
H
H
H
H
ORG, VAPOR (PPM)
19
10
% REC
40
16
67
87
86
100
86
70
25
53
91
87
43
80
LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
SANDY SILT AND SILTY SAND MIX, gray and brown moist, stiff/dense, fine-grained, trace alluminum, glass and rubber (fill)
SILT, light gray, moist, very stiff, porous
SILTY SAND, blue-gray, moist, very dense, very fine^ to fine-grained, slightly cemented SILT, blue-gray, moist, hard, porous, cemented, some very fine-grained sand
SAND, dark gray, moist, very dense, very fine to fine-grained, some silt CLAYEY SILT, olive-brown, moist, hard, horizontal caliche veinlets, porous
below 14 feet, gray •
from 16 to 17 feet, sandy
SILTY SAND, gray, moist to wet, dense, very fine to fine-grained, some clay SAND, tan, dry, dense, very line to coarse-grained
SANDY SILT, orange-gray, moist, hard, very fine-grained sand, trace clay, laminated SILTY SAND, red-brown, moist, very dense, very [ine to medium-grained, some clay
SANDY SILT, gray, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay, some orange staining
below 34 feet, wet
uses
M l ^ SM
ML
SM ML
SP
ML
SM
ML SM
ML
26
55
16
46
23
WELL DATA
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-3 PAGE 2 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
i i t t i i i
f 1
I >
i i
I I
DEPTH
H 3 5 -SAMPLE SAMPLE LAB
ANAL. ORG, VAPOR
V. REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS 6 IN,
GRAPHIC LOG
WELL DATA
49
40 —
SANDY SILT, gray, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay, some orange staining
ML
SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine tc fine-grained, some clay
SM
008 H 67
57 SAND, orange-tan. moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace to some silt
SP
SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained, trace clay
SM
009 H 47 45
SAND, orange-gray, moist, dense, fine to coarse-grained, trace silt SW
•'•i'-i'-i 4i 4,
50 —
55
60 — I 1
I 65 —
- 7 0 '
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-4 PAGE 1 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW AUGER
START DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 26,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLIT BARREL WITH 2.5" SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER
DEPTH
- 0 -SAMPLE
SAMPLE NO,
LAB ANAL.
ORG, VAPOR
% R E C , LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS 6 IN,
GRAPH ICLOG
WELL DATA
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
001
002
003
004
005
006
- 3 5 -
H
H
H
H
H
^ I 007 I H
92 ASPHALT AND SANDY CLAY, dark brown and black, moist, hard, fine to coarse-grained
CL
73 50
SILTY SAND, brown, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained
SM ML
73 SILT, light brown-gray, moist, stjif, trace very fine-grained sand, slightly cemented
100 LAMINATED SILT AND SILTY SAND, gray and brown, moist, stiff, very fine-grained ML
60 SAND, gray, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained SILTY SAND, mottled gray and orange-brown, moistr dense, fine-grained, trace clay
SP SM
SAND, light orange-gray, dry, fine to medium-grained, tracg silt
SP
SILTY SAND, orange-gray, moist to wet, very dense, very fine to medium-grained
SM
100 88
SILT, green-gray, moist, hard, fine caliche veinlets, some clay ML 100 SILTY SAND, brown, moist to wet, dense, very fine-grained
SM
SILT, gray, moist, very stiff SILTY SAND, gray, moist to wet, dense, very fine-grained SM
73 SAND, gray to orange-brown, dry, dense, very fine to fine-grained
SP
74
SILT, gray, dry, hard, some very fine-grained sand and clay
ML
87 42
71
SAND, light gray, dry, dense, very fine to medium-grained
SP
100 SANDY SILT, brown-gray, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay
ML
34
34
SILT, gray, dry, hard, laminated with fine sand layers ML
J2. SILTY SAND, gray, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained
SM 28
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
1 ^ .4i.4
BORING NO. CMW-4 PAGE 2 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
i i i
I
I I
DEPTH
- 3 5 -SAMPLE
40 —
45
SAMPLE NO.
008
009
LAB ANAL
H
H
ORG. VAPOR
%REC.
57
80
34
80
LrTHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION BLOWS SIN. WEU DATA
SILTY SAND, gray, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained SAND, light gray, dry, dense, very fine to fine-grained SILT, gray, moist, hard SAND, brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, some silt
SANDY SILT, brown, moist, dense, very fine-grained sand
ML
10
•'•i'-i'-i'-i-'-i' fc S S V V fc •* "fc •* v "fc
I
\ • i K** \^ •
r<fc 'i.- -• V :; fc •» • * 'fc ffc • * •:
. * ^ '
50 —
55 —
60 —
65 —
- 7 0
U = THIN WALL TUBE •
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-5 PAGE 1 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILUNG METHOD: HOLLOW AUGER
START DATE: FEBRUARY 10.1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 10,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLrT BARREL WITH 2.5' SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER
DEPTH
h-0 -SAMPLE
5 —
10 —
15 —
20
25 —
30 —
- 3 5 '
SAMPLE NO.
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
LAB ANAL.
H
H
H
H
H
H
ORG. VAPOR
%REC.
80
73
100
87
100
93
86
87
100
80
43
56 17
80
LrTHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
CLAYEY SAND, brown, saturated, dense, very fine to coarse-grained, some silt (fill) SILTY SAND, dark green-gray, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace clay, slightly porous
SANDY SILT, dark green-gray, moist, very stiff to hard, fine-grained sand, some clay SAND, light gray, moist, very dense, very fine to fine-grained, some silt tine-grainea, some sm SILT, green-gray, moist, hard, porous, caliche deposits In pores SILTY SAND, green-gray, nxDist. very dense, very fin to medium-grained CLAYEY SAND, mottled gray and brown, moist, very dense, very fine to medium-grained, slightly cementedj SILTY SAND, olive, moist, dense to very dense, cemented, porous
at 14 feet, minor silt layer, gray SANO, light gray, moist, dense, fine to medium-grained, trace silt SILT, gray, moist, hard, trace fine sand SILTY SAND, olive, moist, very dense, very fine to fine-grained, slightly porous
SANDY SILT, gray and brown, moist, hard, fine-grained sand, slightly porous and cemented
SILTY SAND, olive, moist, very dense, very fine to fine-grained, slightly cemented
below 30 feet, light gray, less silt
SANDY SILT, green-gray, moist to wet, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, trace clay, llmonite stained pores
U = THIN WALL TUBE
0 = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLrr BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-5 PAGE 2 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
i i i
DEPTH
- 3 5 -S AM PLE
40 —
45
SAMPLE SO.
008
009
ua ANAL.
H
H
ORG. VAPOR
(ppnr KREC.
51
47
34
73
LrrwoLOGC DESCRIPTION
SANDY SILT, green-gray, moist to wet, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, trace clay, linx^nite stained pores
at 36 feet, minor silty sand lens at 36.5 feet, laminations below 38 feet, saturated at 40.5 feet, saturated sand lens, very fine to fine-grained, some silt, 1 Inch thick
uses
ML
26
22
• 1* *.i '.i V.i
:VVVVV"* f\:\:\:^4i\i
WELL DATA
50
55 —
60 —
65 —
- 7 0
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLrr BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-6 PAGE 1 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANrTARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW AUGER
START DATE: FEBRUARY 4,1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 4,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLIT BARREL WrrH 2.5- SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER
DEPTH
- 0 -SAMPLE
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
- 3 5 -
SAMPLE NO.
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
LAB ANAL.
H
H
H
H
H
H
ORG. VAPOR (PPM)
<1
%REC.
100
100
13
87
12
93
51
100
100
100
100
87
57
100
LnVOLOQIC DESCRIPTION WEU DATA
CLAYEY SAND, dark brown, wet, dense, fine-grained, trace silt SILTY SAND, tan, dry to moist, very dense, fine-grained, very porous CLAYEY SAND, rnottled dark gray and brown, moist, dense, fine-grained, very porous, some silt SILT, light blue-green gray with some orange mottling, moist, very stiff to hard SAND, light gray, moist, loose, very fine to 7 coarse-grained, some minor silt layers less than 2 Inches thick
SILTY SAND, light brown, moist, very dense, fine-grained, some clay
CLAYEY SAND, brown, moist, dense, fine-grained, some silt SANDY SILT, brown, moist to wet, stiff, some clay, very fine to medium-grained sand
SAND, nwttled brown and gray, moist, dense, fine-grained, some silt SILTY SAND, brown-gray, moist, dense, fine-grained, some silt ^ / SANDY SILT, brown, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay
SILTY SAND, mottled orange-brown and light gray, moist, dense, fine-grained
SANDY SILT, orange-gray, moist, stiff, fine-grained sand, trace clay, slightly porous SILTY SAND, gray, moist, dense, veiy fine to fine-grained
SANDY SILT, gray, moist to wet, medium stiff, very \ fine-grained sand
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLrr BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-6 PAGE 2 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANrTARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
- 3 5 -SAMPLE
SAMPLE LAB ANAL
ORG. VAPOR
%REC. LrrHOLOGC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS GRAPH-eiN. CLOQ
WEU DATA
40
54 SANDY SILT. gray, moist to wet. medium stiff, very fine-grained sand ^ SM
008 H 73
100
SILTY SAND, light gray, moist, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, trace llmonite and cart>on specks
below 40 feel, brown
at 42 feet, silt layer 5 Inches thick at 43 feel, laminations
28
008 H 73 SILT, gray, moist, hard, trace sand ML
45 50
; V V V V V k •* V *. s . * k *fc
. •* *. *. k * . *fc 4ft
. S V •* ^ ^ * V y V V t'
50 —
55 —
60 —
65 —
- 7 0
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-7 PAGE 1 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW AUGER
START DATE: FEBRUARY 5,1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 7,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: SPLH" BARREL WITH 2.5" SLEEVES AND 180 LB. DRIVE HAMMER
DEPTH
1—0 -SAMPLE
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
- 3 5 -
SAMPLE NO.
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
LAB ANAL
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
ORG. VAPOR (PPM)
%REC.
71
80
43
93
100
87
51
100
86
87
100
73
57
100
LITHOLOGC DESCRIPTION W a i DATA
CLAYEY SAND,dark brown, wet, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, some silt SILTY SAND, brown-gray, wet, dense, very fine lo y coarse-grained, trace clay X CLAYEY SAND, dark gray, moist, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, some sill, porous
SAND, light gray, moist, medium dense, fine lo coarse-grained, well-graded
SILT, blue-gray, moist, hard SILTY SAND, mottled orange-brown-gray, moist, very dense, fine to medium-grained CLAYEY SAND, mottled brown and gray, moist. veryS dense, very fine to fine-grained SILT, blue-gray, moist, hard, porous
SILTY SAND, brown, moist, very dense, fine to medium-grained SAND, light gray, moist, dense, very fine lo medium-grained
SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medlum-q rained SAND, gray, nDolst, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace silt, some sill and silly sand seams CLAYEY SANO, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, some silt SILT, mottled orange and gray, moist, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
SILTY SAND, light orange-brown, moist, very dense, very fine to f Ine-qralned SANDY CLAY, brown, moist to wet, very stiff, fine-qralned sand, some silt SILTY SAND, light orange-brown, moist, very dense very fine to fine-grained SANDY SILT, mottled orange-gray, moist, hard, f Ine-qralned sand SAND, gray-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, poorly graded
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLrr BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-7 PAGE 2 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANfFARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
\-35-SAMPLE
40 —
45
SAMPLE NO.
008
009
LAB ANAL.
H
H
ORG. VAPOR WW
%REC.
36
73
29
67
LnWOLOGC OeSCHIPTION
SAND, gray-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, poorly graded
below 40 feet, very fine lo coarse-grained, well-graded
uses
SP
SW
BLOWS BIN.
18
15
GRAPH-CLOQ
iti'.tr.ti
WEU DATA
' t' V t ' V y
<^ 4.{ :i *i 4i
>'t It U ' t
50
55
60 —
f \
i i I I
65
- 7 0 '
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R«= ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLrr BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-8 PAGE 1 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME:Fresno Sanitary Landfill LOGGED BY: Jason Preece DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger
START DATE: November 18,1992 COMPLETION DATE: November 19,1992 ELEVATION: 270 Feet +1- 2 Feet SAMPLER TYPE: 3-Inch Diameter Split Barrel
DEPTH
1—0 -SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO, U B ANAL.
ORa VAPOR
%REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine lo medium-grained
uses GRAPH-CLOG
WELL DATA
(PPM)
10 —
15 —
20
25 001 N 0.0 70
30
- 3 5 '
SM
SILT, gray, dry, hard, some clay ML
SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained >
SM ML
SILT, light blue-gray, dry, hard below 8 feel, gray-brown
SANDY SILT, brown-gray, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand
ML
SILTY SANO, light gray, dry, dense, very fine to fine-grained, some sand lenses
CLAYEY SILT, gray-brown lo gray below 28 feet, moist, very stiff, some cemented zones below 28.5 feet
ML
SANDY SILT, olive-brown, moist, stiff, very fine-grained sand, easy drilling
ML
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-8 PAGE 2 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: Fresno Sanitary Landfill LOGGED BY: Jason Preece
DEPTH
- 3 5 -SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO. ua ANAL.
ORG. VAPOR %REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS
SIN. GRAPH ICLOG
WELL DATA
40 t 002 N 0.0 70
45 003 N 0.0 50
50
55 —
60 —
65
SANDY SILT, olive-brown, moist, stiff, very fine-grained sand, easy drilling
ML SM
SILTY SAND, olive-brown and brown, moist, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, some limonite stained and cemented zones
CLAYEY SILT, mottled orange-brown and gray, moist, very stiff, trace to some very fine-grained sand
ML
SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, very dense, very fine to fine-grained, cemented, abundant limonite deposits
SM
\1,\'\t'4t\'v ;.'::y.«;7«;.' fL.
SAND, gray, moist, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, some silly sand layers, poorly graded
SP
•fc«V*V'>' <fc.*fc*v*V*
•fc.«fc.«fc."fc.
*fc.*fc.*fc.'fc.
- 7 0
Boring terminated at 65 feet. No free ground water encountered. See Well Data for details on backfilling.
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-9 PAGE 1 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: Fresno Sanitary Landfill LOGGED BY: Jason Preece DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger
START DATE: November 20,1992 COMPLETION DATE: November 20,1992 ELEVATION: 270 Feet -f/- 2 Feet SAMPLER TYPE: 3-Inch Diameter Split Barrel
DEPTH
— 0 -SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO. U B ANAL,
ORG. VAPOR
%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses GRAPH' ICLOG WELL DATA
(PPM)
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25
SILTY SAND, dark orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, abundant silt, some clay
below 4 feel, gray-brown, less sill and clay
SM
belwo 12 feel, gray
SILT, gray, moist, stiff, some clay, trace very fine-grained sand
ML
SAND, brown-gray, moist, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, some sill
SP
SILT, gray, moist, hard ML
SANDY SILT, orange-brown, moist, stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay
ML
001 N 0.0 SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace clay
SM
30 SILT, gray, moist, very stiff lo hard, some cemented zones and caliche vienlets
ML
- 3 5 -
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CMW-9 PAGE 2 OF 2
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-FLD PROJECT NAME: Fresno Sanitary Landfill LOGGED BY: Jason Preece
DEPTH
- 3 5 -SAMPLE
SAMPLE NO.
U B ANAL.
ORG. VAPOR
%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses BLOWS SIN.
GRAPHIC LOQ
WELL DATA
SILT, gray, moist, very stiff lo hard, some cemented zones and caliche veinlets
ML
SILTY SAND, olive-brown and brown, moist, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, trace limonite stained and cemented zones
SM
40 002 N 0.0
45 003 N 0.0 10
SAND, light orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to fine-grained, some silt, poorly graded
SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, cemented
SP
SM
^ ^ ^ ^ ;.<;.y.<.-.y;<
50
SANDY SILT, mottled olive-gray and orange-brown, moist, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, trace clay
ML
55 —
60 —
65
.................... k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4:.4:.4;,4:.4:.4;,4:.
Boring terminated at 65 feet. No free ground water encountered. See Well Data for details on backfilling.
- 7 0
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-1 PAGE 1 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: ROTARY WASH
START DATE: JANUARY 17,1992 COMPLETION DATE: JANUARY 21,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES
3L0WS SIN. DEPTH
— 0 -SAMPLE mm
NO. ANAL.
ORG. VAPOR
% REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
- 3 5 -
CLAYEY SAND, dark brown, moist to wet, dense, very fine lo fine-grained
below 5 feet, mottled gray and brown
at 8 feet, hard drilling CLAYEY SILT, light gray, dry, hard, cemented
SM SILTY SAND, dark orange-brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace clay
CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, slightly cemented ML
SILTY SAND, brown, medium dense lo dense, very Jjnejp ri]sdiiifp-grainesi ^ SAND, orange-brown, medium dense to dense, fine lo coarse-grained, trace very fine-grained sand and silt, well-graded
CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, moderately cemented, some white caliche
from 32 to 34 feet, hard drilling, very cemented
SILTY CLAY, orange-tan, medium stiff, some very fine-grained sand CL
U = THIN WALL TUB^
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-1 PAGE 2 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
H 3 5 -SAMPLE
NO. ANAL VAPOR %REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SIN. WELL DATA
40 —
45 —
50 —
55 —
•60 —
65 —
- 7 0 '
SILTY CLAY, orange-tan, medium stiff, some very fine-grained sand
CL
CLAYEY SAND, red-orange-brown, medium dense, very fine-grained, some sill and medium-grained biotite flakes
SC
SAND, orange-brown, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, well-graded
SW
SANDY CLAY, orange-brown, stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand
below 53 feel, orange-tan
CL
at 58 feet, minor silty sand lens, fine to medium-grained
CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, slightly cemented ML
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD i
BORING NO. CDM-1 PAGE 3 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
- 7 0 -SAMPLE
>J0. ANAL VAPOR %REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses
GRAPH-ICLOG
WELL DATA
75 —
80
85 001 50
90
95 001 60
100-
-105-
CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, slightly cemented ML
SILTY CLAY, tan, very stiff, some very fine to medium-grained sand
CL
SAND, light gray, dense, medium lo coarse-grained, _some sijtjand_cla^ ^ SILTY CLAY, tan-gray, very stiff, some very fine to fine-grained sand
SILTY SAND, orange-brown, very dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, trace very coarse-grained sand and clay, saturated with clear water
SAND, orange-brown, very dense, fine to very coarse-grained, well-graded
SM
SW
contact sharp and, irregular
'...'.*.*.*.
'...'..."...
£L;^EYJiiigraii. vary §iiif . SILTY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine to fine-grained
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-1 PAGE 4 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
i
DEPTH
-105-SAMPLE
110—
115—
120 —
125 —
130—
135 —
-140-
NO. ANAL. VAPOR %REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
SILTY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained ^
, 3 M ^ ' T M l J
CLAYEY SILT,gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
SAND, gray, very dense, nnedium lo very coarse-grained, trace to some fine gravel
GRAVELLY SAND, gray, very dense, fine lo very coarse-grained sand, fine gravel
CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff to hard
SAND, orange-brown, very dense, fine to £oarse-gralned, well-graded / CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff to hard, limonite coated veinlets
uses
SW
SW
ML
SW " M L "
SIN. ICLOG
HBHBHBI
WELL DATA
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-1 PAGE 5 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
- M O -SAMPLE pimp
NO. ANAL. VAPOR
%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses 3L0WS SIN.
GRAPH-ICLOG
WELL DATA
145—
150-
155 —
160 —
165—
170 —
-175-
CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff to hard, limonite coated elQlfils . _
SANDY CLAY, orange-brown, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained sand, some silt
CLAYEY SAND, orange-brown, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained
£LAi:EY.,5iLL gcay. liard CLAYEY SAND, orange-brown, very dense, very fine to fine-grained
CLAYEY SILT, green-gray, hard
al 156 feet, fine-grained sandy layer
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-1 PAGE 6 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
M 7 5 -SAMPLE
NO, ANAL. VAPOR %REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
'_CLAYEYSIIJ,greenng^ra^hard _ _ _ SANDY CLAY, gray-Ian, very stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some sill
uses SIN. ICLOQ WELL DATA
180—
185-
190-
195 —
200—
205-
-210-
002
ML CL
SAND, gray, very dense, fine lo coarse-grained, trace silt, poorly graded
SP
100
^ANpY^ILTjanJiard, fine-grained.sajid _ _ _ SILTY SANO, tan, very dense, very fine to ^ jpediymj^raingd SAND, gray, very dense, very fine lo medium-grained,
_£00_r!y graded_ ^ SANDY CLAY AND SANDY SILT, light gray, hard, very fine lo fine-grained sand
ML SMy SP
~CL
CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, hard, trace very fine-grained sand
ML
below 203 feet, very stiff, some orange-brown
SAND, gray, very dense, fine lo very coarse-grained7\ micaceous, poorly graded
i i
i
I
t U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
I I BORING NO. CDM-1
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
PAGE 7 OF 8
SIN, ICLOG DEPTH
- 2 1 0 -SAMPLE
NO. T3tB-ANAL. ens-
VAPOR
%flEC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
215—
220—
225 —
230 —
235—
240 —
-245-
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
SAND, gray, very dense, fine to very coarse-grained, micaceous, Eoorl^jjo well-graded y SANDY CLAY, gray and orange-tan, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand, some silt
SW_ ~ C L "
SANDY SILT, orange to peach, hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, minor cemented layer
ML
CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, very stiff
SAND, gray, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, iliicateoiis _ ^ CLAYEY SILT, orange-gray, stiff to ve^ stiff
below 227 feel, hard
ML
"ML
SANDY SILT, orange-gray, very stiff, very fine lo medium-grained sand, some clay, minor thin silly sand lenses
ML
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
I
BORING NO. CDM-1 PAGE 8 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
1-245-SAMPLE
NO, ANAL. VAPOR %REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
3 C ML
uses SIN. ICLOG WELL DATA
250-
SANDY SILT, orange-gray, very stiff, very fine to medium-grained sand, some clay, minor thin silly sand^ lenses / SILT, gray, hard, some clay, moderately cemented
below 247 feet, very stiff
255—
260 —
265 —
270-
275 —
-280-
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
t I
BORING NO. CDM-2 PAGE 1 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: ROTARY WASH
START DATE: June 24,1992 COMPLETION DATE: June 25. 1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES
DEPTH
— 0 -SAMPLE
NO. ANAL. VAPOR NREC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses
GRAPH-ICLOG
WELL DATA
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25 —
30 —
- 3 5 -
CLAYEY SILT, gray-brown, dry lo moist below 2 feet, stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
at 3 feel, red-brown
below 5 feet, light gray, dry
ML
at 8 feel, calcified, hard drilling below 9 feet, moist
SILTY SAND, orange-brown, moist, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained, cemented
SM
CLAYEY SILT, gray, moist, very stiff, some white caliche
ML
SAND, orange-brown, medium-dense, fine to coarse-grained, moderately graded
SW
SILTY SAND, gray, dense, very fine to fine-grained, some minor clayey sill lenses
SM
CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, calcified, some minor sandy silt lenses
SANDY SILT, brown-gray, stiff lo very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay
ML
ML
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-2 PAGE 2 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
1-35-SAMPLE
ANAL VAPOR % REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses 6 IN. 10 LOG WELL DATA
40 —
45 —
50
55 —
60 —
65 —
- 7 0 '
SANDY SILT, brown-gray, stiff to very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay
ML
SILTY SAND, dark orange-brown, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, some clay
SM
SANDY SILT, light orange-brown, medium stiff to stiff, very fine-grained sand, sorneclay_
CLAYEY SILT, gray, stiff, some stained micropores
CLAYEY SAND, light orange-red-tan, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, some sill
ML
M"L
SC
CLAYEY SILT, light gray, stiff
SAND, orange-brown to gray-brown, dense, very fine to very coarse-grained, well-graded
ML
SW
SILTY CLAY, gray to light gray, very stiff C L
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD i
BORING NO. CDM-2 PAGE 3 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
SIN, mm. ICLOG
DEPTH
- 7 0 -SAMPLE
NO, ANAL. VAPOR •JiREC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
75-
80 —
85 —
90 —
95 —
100 —
-105-
SILTY CLAY, gray lo light gray, very stiff C L
SANDY SILT, gray, stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay
ML
SAND, gray, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, some silt, pooriy graded
al 79 feet, cemented silt lens
t)elow 82 feet, some coarse-grained sand
SP
SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, someclay_ /
SILTY SAND, orange and red-brown, stiff, very fine to fine-grained, red-brown material is well cemented
ML SM~
SILT, gray, hanJ, some clay, cemented
below 97 feel, light gray, stiff, uncemenled
ML
SILTY SAND, light gray, very dense, very fine to medium-grained
below 105 feel, light brown-gray
SM
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-2 PAGE 4 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
TO? SIN.
mm ICLOG
DEPTH
1-105-SAMPLE mm
NO, ANAL. •msr
VAPOR
%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
110—
115—
120 —
125 —
130-
135-
-140-
001 0.0
SILTY SAND, light gray, very dense, very fine to medium-grained
below 108 feel, hard drilling, dari red-brown, cemented, trace pea gravel
SM
bielow 116 feel, gray, dense, easier drilling
SAND, gray, very dense, fine lo coarse-grained, some sill
SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff lo hard, very fine lo medium-grained, some sand lenses
SW
M"L
SILT, gray, very stiff, some very fine sand ML
SILTY SAND, gray, dense, very fine-grained SM
40 SANO, gray, dense, very fine to fine-grained, some -Sill . y
2E. ML
CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
SANDY SILT, brown-gray, hard, very fine-grained sand, cemented
X
ML
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-2 PAGE 5 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
GRAPH-ICLOG DEPTH
-140-SAMPLE SAMPLE
*J0. LAB ANAL.
ORG. VAPOR
% REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
145—
150—
155 —
160 —
165—
170 —
-175-
SANDY SILT, brown-gray, hard, very fine-grained sand, cemented /
at_14_1_feeti sand lens
CLAYEY SILT, light gray, stiff
SANDY CLAY, light brown, stiff, very fine-grained sand, some sill
C L
SILTY SAND, dari< orange-brown, very dense, very fine lo tine-grained, trace clay, cemented
SM
SANDY CLAY, lingl orange-brown, stiff, very fine to fine-grained, some sill
b>elow 158 feel, light gray
C L
SILTY CLAY, light gray lo gray, stiff
above 163 feet, some very fine-grained sand
C L
below 168 feel, gray,'hard
below 175 feel, light gray, stiff
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-2 PAGE 6 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
GRAPH, ICLOG
DEPTH
- ^ 7 5 -SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO. u 5 -ANAL. VAPOR
%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses 3L0WS SIN.
WEU DATA
180-
185—
190 —
195 —
200—
205 —
-210-
SILTYCLAY, light gray, stiff
below 177 feel, some very fine-grained sand
C L
SANDY SILT, gray and gray-brown, very stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay, trace orange color
ML
CLAYEY SILT, light gray, stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
ML
below 190 feel, trace very coarse-grained sand, salmon colored, well-rounded, pryoclastic composition below 191 feet, gray, hard t>elow 193 feel, light gray, stiff
below 196 feet, gray, hard
SILT, salmon-pink, very stiff, cemented, pyroclastic composition
ML
CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, cemented
al 205 feet, hard drilling
ML
SILTY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained, some clay
SM
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-2 PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
PAGE 7 OF 8
TO? SIN.
mm ICLOG
DEPTH
- 2 1 0 -SAMPLE
NO. ANAL. VAPOR ^^REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
215—
220-
225-
230 —
235—
240-
-245-
1 '
002 0.0 50
SILTY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine to fine^grainedjjsome cjay SANDY SILT, orange-gray, hard, slightly cemented
SM ML
SAND, orange-gray, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, abundant mica flakes
SW
SANDY SILT, gray, hard, fine-grained ML
SILTY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine lo medium-grained
SM
SAND, gray, very dense, fine to very coarse-grained, some minor silty sand lenses
SANDY CLAY, brown with dari< gray laminations, stiff, very fine to fine-grained
SW
C L
CLAYEY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained, some sill
SC
SANDY SILT, light gray, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay
ML
CLAYEY SILT, light gray, very stiff
al 245 feel. dari< brown-black lens, organic rich
ML
U = THIN WALL TUBE
0 = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-2 PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
PAGE 8 OF 8
DEPTH
F-245-SAMPLE mm
NO. ANAL.
BBS-VAPOR
%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SLOWS SIN.
GRAPH-ICLOG
W a L DATA
250-
CLAYEY SILT, light gray, very stiff
t>elow 246 feel, trace fine-grained sand
SANDY SILT, gray, hard, very fine-grained sand, slightly cemented
255—
260 —
265 —
270—
275 —
-280-
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-3 PAGE 1 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: ROTARY WASH
START DATE: June 29,1992 COMPLETION DATE: July 1, 1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES
DEPTH
— 0 -SAMPLE mpiTi
NO. ANAL. VAPOR %REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses
SLOWS SIN.
GRAPH. ICLOG
WELL DATA
5 —
I O
I S —
20 —
25 —
30
- 3 5 '
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
SANDY SILT, brown, dry to moist below 1 fool, very stiff, fine to medium-grained sand ^
ML
ML CLAYEY SILT, blue-gray, dry lo moist, hard, cemented
SILTY SAND, light gray, moist lo wet, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, some clay
below 8 feet, brown, fine-grained
SM
SAND, gray-brown, dense, medium to very coarse-grained, some minor silty sand laminations, orange-brown
SP
SILT, tan, medium stiff to hard, some cemented zones, some clay
ML
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-3 PAGE 2 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
TO? SIN.
ICLOG DEPTH
1—35-SAMPLE mtm
NO. ANAL.
CHS" VAPOR
%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
40 —
45 —
50
55 —
60 —
65 —
- 7 0
SILT, tan, medium stiff lo hard, some cemented zones, some clay
M L
SAND, dari< gray, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, some silt and clay, abundant mica flakes, pooriy graded
SILTY SAND, orange-brown, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, some clayey sill lenses
SP
SM
SAND, gray-brown, dense, fine to coarse-grained, some sill
SP
SILT, gray and brown, hard, very cemented, some fine-grained sand
SAND, orange-brown, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, some sill and silly sand lenses
ML
SW
CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand ML
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-3 PAGE 3 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
- 7 0 -SAMPLE ssnPTp
NO. ANAL. VAPOR
14 REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SLOWS SIN,
GRAPHIC LOQ
WELL DATA
001 0.0 40
75-
1'
CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand y
SAND, gray lo light gray, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, trace pebbles, some silt and clay, poorly graded
_ML SP
B O
S S -
90 —
95 —
100 —
below 75 feel, well-graded SW
SANDY SILT, red-orange-brown, hard, very fine-grained sand, sonne clay
ML
CLAYEY SILT, light gray, hard, slightly cemented ML
-105-
1 ' at 105 feel, trace very coarse-grained sand
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-3 PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
PAGE 4 OF 8
I I «
mm NO,
T3B-ANAL.
ORG. VAPOR
DEPTH
H05-SAMPLE %REe, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses
TO? SIN. mm-
ICLOG
WELL DATA
l i o
n s -
120 —
125 —
130—
135-
-140-
CLAYEY SILT, light gray, hard, slightly cemented
SANDY SILT, red-orange-brown, hard, very fine-grained sand, some clay, cemented
ML
M"L
SILTY CLAY, light brown-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand and pebbles
C L
at 117 feet, minor silty sand lens, orange-brown
at 121 feet, minor sand lens
from 134 to 135 feel, well-cemented
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-3 PAGE 5 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
3L0WS SIN.
GRAPH-ICLOG DEPTH
-140-SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO. u ? -ANAL.
mr VAPOR
%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
145-
150-
155 —
160 —
165—
170 —
-175-
002 0.0 30
SILTY C U Y , light brown-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand and pebbles
SW SAND, gray, very dense, tine lo very coarse-grained SANDY SILT, gray, hard, fine lo coarse-grained sand, some clay
ML
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
SILTY SAND, light gray, very dense, very fine to medium-grained, some clay
CLAYEY SILT, light brown-gray, hard
CLAYEY SAND, gray-brown, very dense, very fine to medium-grained, some sill
SAND, orange-brown, very dense, medium lo very coarse-grained, poorly graded
CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, some very fine lo medium-grained sand
SAND, orange-gray, very dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, some sill
below 170 feel, some very coarse-grained sand, while and pink
SILTY C U Y , light green-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
SM_ " M L
SC
SP
ML
SW
C L
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-3 PAGE 6 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
SLOWS SIN,
GRAPH, ICLOG
DEPTH
M75-SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO. ua ANAL VAPOR
S P E C . LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
ISO-
I B S -
190 —
195-
200—
205 —
-210-
SILTY C U Y , light green-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
SANO, light gray and while, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, well-graded, grains are well rounded and have pyroclastic composition
SANDY C U Y , orange-gray, very stiff, very fine to fine sand, some sill and minor sand lenses
CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, hard, trace very fine-grained sand
at 195 feet, some light violet color
at 205 feet, some dry, hard, cemented zones
C L
SW
C L
ML
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-3 PAGE 7 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
TO? SIN.
GRAPH-ICLOG
DEPTH
h-210-SAMPLE
NO. ANAL 7m~ VAPOR
%REe, LrTHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
215—
220—
225 —
230 —
235—
240 —
-245-
CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, hard, trace very fine-grained sand
ML
SILTY CLAY, light green-gray, hard, trace very fine gravel, trace salmon color
C L
SAND, salmon, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, some fine lo coarse gravel, well-rounded, pooriy graded
GRAVELLY SANO, black and white, medium lo very coarse-grained, subangularto subrounded, fine gravel, well-graded
SP
SW
CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, hard, trace fine sand, moderately cemented
ML
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-3 PAGE 8 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
1 1 i
POT? 6 IN.
GRAPH, ICLOG DEPTH
h245-SAMPLE mtm
NO.
T3B-ANAL. VAPOR
%REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, hard, trace very fine-grained sand
250-
255—
260 —
265-
270—
275 —
-280-
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-4 PAGE 1 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: ROTARY WASH
START OATE: JANUARY 27,1992 COMPLETION DATE: JANUARY 27, 1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES
TO? 6 IN. mm:
ICLOG
DEPTH
— 0 -SAMPLE mm
NO.
TO-ANAL. mr-
VAPOR
%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
5 —
10 —
15 —
20 —
25
30 —
- 3 5 -
CLAYEY SAND, dari< brown, wet, medium stiff, very fine lo fine-grained, some sill
SC
SILTY SAND, light gray-brown, moist, medium dense, very fine to fine-grained
SM
SANDY SILT, gray, moist, stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay
some minor silty sand lenses and slightly cemented zones
ML
SILTY SANO, orange-brown, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, slightly cemented
SM
SANDY C U Y , orange-brown, medium stiff, very fine^ i s flQS-gialnQsLs^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CLAYEYSILT,gray, st[tf ^ ^ SANDY C U Y , orange-tan, stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some silt
SAND, orange-brown, dense, very fine to very coarse-grained
CL "ML"
CL
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-4 PAGE 2 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
f - 3 S -SAMPLE mm
NO. ANAL. VAPOR
%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
SANO, orange-brown, dense, very fine lo very coarse-grained, well-graded
uses LOWS
GIN. GRAPH, ICLOG WELL DATA
40 —
45 —
50 —
55 —
60 —
65 —
SW
al 45 feel, minor clayey silt lens, gray, very stiff ,.'.».'...'.'
SANDY SILT, orange-brown, very stiff, very fine lo Jine;^rained_sand^some clay
SILTY C U Y , light orange-brown, stiff, some very _fine^rained_sand_
SAND, orange-brown, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, some fine gravel up to 3/16 inch in dinnension
ML CL
SW
- 7 0
.*,..*,..*.
.*...*.*.*.•
.*,*.'...**
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-4 PAGE 3 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
H 7 0 -SAMPLE
NO TO-ANAL.
CH5— VAPOR
%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses GRAPH-ICLOG
WELL DATA
001 0.0 75
75 —
80 —
85 —
90 —
95 —
100-
SAND, orange-brown, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, some fine gravel up lo 3/16 inch in dinnension, well-graded
below 74 feet, coarse-grained, pebbles are subrounded
SW .'.*.'...*.•
,iy<,yiy
:i.y<,yi.v ,iyi.yiy'
:iy<,y<.v
GRAVELLY SAND, gray, dense, medium lo very coarse-grained, fine gravel up to 3/8 inch in dimension
SANDY C U Y , light brown, stiff, very fine lo Jinej^rained san(i_some sjtt_ SILT, light gray, hard, cemented
from 91 to 95 feet, hard drilling, drill rods chatter
CL
ML
CLAYEY SILT, gray, stiff ML
-105-
at 103 feet, orange colored layer
below 105 feet, some fine-grained sand
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-4 PAGE 4 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
I
I I
DEPTH
-105-SAMPLE
NO. ANAL. VAPOR % REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SIN. ICLOG WELL DATA
n o
u s -
120 —
125 —
130—
135 —
CLAYEY SILT, light gray, hard, some fine-grained sand, cemented
ML
SANO, gray, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, well-graded
SW
iyi,'*,*i"v*«
SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay, some cemented zones
SAND, gray, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, some sill, well-graded
ML
SW k^V'<,yi
*,..*..*..
SILT, gray, very stiff ML
CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, some very fine to medium-grained sand
ML
-140-
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLrr BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-4 PAGE 5 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
TO? 6 IN.
mm. ICLOG
DEPTH
—140-SAMPLE mm
NO.
TO-ANAL. Bna—
VAPOR
%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
002 40 CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, some very fine to jriedium^rained sand_ / SAND, gray, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, trace sill
_ML sw'
145-
150—
155 —
160 —
165—
170 —
SANDY SILT, orange-brown, hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay, minor clayey sand lenses, slightly cemented
ML
SILT, gray, hard, some clay, slightly cemented ML
from 162 lo 163 feet, hard drilling
SANDY SILT, gray, hard, very fine to medium-grained sand, some clay, minor silty sand lenses
ML
-175-
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-4 PAGE 6 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
M 7 5 -SAMPLE
NO. ANAL. VAPOR %REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses 6 IN. IC LOO WELL DATA
ISO-
185—
190 —
195-
200—
205-
-210-
003
SANDY SILT, gray, hard, very fine to medium-grained sand, some clay, minor silty sand lenses
ML
CLAYEY SANO, light gray, dense, very fine to medium-grained, some sill
SC
SANO, gray, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, well-graded, some silt
sw
SILTY C U Y , light purple-gray, very stiff to hard CL
from 193 lo 194 feel, hard drilling
SANDY C U Y , light brown-gray, stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some limonite stains
CL
50
SANO, gray-brown, dense, medium to very coarse-grained, well-graded
SAND, light pink-brown, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, trace silt (volcanlclastic sediment)
SAND, light pink-brown, dense, very fine to very coarse-grained, well-graded
SW
SP
SW I f J
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-4 PAGE 7 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
f-210-SAMPLE mm
NO.
TO-ANAL.
BH5-VAPOR
%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SLOWS SIN,
GRAPH, ICLOG
WELL DATA
215—
220—
225 —
230 —
235—
240 —
SAND, light pink-brown, dense, very fine lo very coarse-grained, well-graded
SW
al 216 feet, white welded tuff layer
SAND, brown-gray, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, trace coarse to very coarse-grained sand
SP
al 228 feel, minor sandy clay layer
SILTY C U Y , tan, stiff, trace very fine-grained sand CL
below 236 feet, very stiff to hard
SILT, light gray and gray, very stiff, some cemented zones, some thin sandy silt and sand lenses, very fine lo fine-grained
ML
-245-
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
i
BORING NO. CDM-4 PAGE 8 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
GRAPH-ICLOG DEPTH
f-245-SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO. U S ANAL.
oRS— VAPOR
14 REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SLOWS 6 IN,
WELL DATA
SILT, light gray and gray, very stiff, some cemented zones, some thin sandy sill and sand lenses, very fine lo fine-grained
ML
250-
255—
260 —
265-
270-
275 —
-280-
I I
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-5 PAGE 1 OF 6
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: ROTARY WASH
START OATE: JANUARY 22,1992 COMPLETION DATE: JANUARY 23, 1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES
DEPTH
I—0 -SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO. OT-ANAL. VAPOR
%REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses TO? IN.
mm ICLOG
WELL DATA
5 —
I O
IS—
20 —
25 —
30 —
- 3 5 '
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
SILTY SANO, dart< brown, moist, dense, very fine to medium-grained
SM
SILT, light gray, moist, very stiff to hard, some very fine-grained sand and clav, slightiv cemented
ML
SANDY SILT, tan-gray, moist, very stiff to hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay
at 8 feet, cemented layer
ML
SAND, light orange-brown, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace sill and clay, pooriy-graded
SP
at 15 feet, minor silt layer
at 24 feet, some coarse-grained sand, appears poorly-graded, slightly to moderately cemented
SANO. gray, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, trace fine gravel up lo 1/4 Inch In dimension
SW
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
I
BORING NO. CDM-5 PAGE 2 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
mm. ICLOG
DEPTH
h-35-SAMPLE psrm
NO.
TO-ANAL.
OT5— VAPOR
V. REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
40 —
45 —
SO —
55 —
60 —
65 —
- 7 0 '
SAND, gray, dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, trace fine gravel up to 1/4 inch in dimension
SW
CLAYEY SAND, orange-brown, medium dense to _dense, wry fine t£_medium^raine(ij50TO ^ SAND, gray-brown, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, well-graded
CLAYEY SANO, orange-brown, dense very fine lo _finej^rajned^orrie sitt_ _ / SAND, orange-gray, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, some slit and clay
CLAYEY SAND, orange-brown, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, some sill
SC
CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff to hard ML
SANDY C U Y , orange-brown and gray, very stiff, very fine to medium-grained sand
CL
SANO, gray-brown, dense, very fine to coarse-grained, micaceous, well-graded
SW
i U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-5 PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
PAGE 3 OF 8
DEPTH
- 7 0 -SAMPLE
75
80
85
90 —
95 —
100 —
-105-
mm NO.
1 '
1 '
TO-ANAL.
001
001
PRC-VAPOR
%REC.
50
SAND, gray, very dense, very fine to _med[unvgrajnedj_poqrly graded^ y
SAND, gray, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, trace silt and clay
below 78 feel, fine lo coarse-grained
50
LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
3^ SAND, gray-brown, dense, very fine to / f " ^ / coarse-grained, micaceous, well-graded /LSM4 SILTY SAND, orange-brown, very dense, very fine / ^ " to fine-grained, trace clav /
SILTY SAND. dari< orange-brown, very fine lo fine-grained, trace clay
SILT, gray, hard, slightly cemented
_SANp, oran^e-bj^wnj/er^finejo coarse-grained^ SILT, gray, very stiff, some very fine-grained sand
from 96 lo 98 feel, orange, hard, cemented
at 102 feel, lost circulation, restored in 2 hours
SANDY C U Y , orange-brown, very stiff, fine-grained, some sill
uses SLOWS SIN.
SW
SM
ML
SW ML
CL
GRAPH-ICLOQ
: n K R i i R i t
*.*.'.*.'.'
WELL DATA
U = THIN WALL TUBE ,
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-5 PAGE 4 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
M OS-SAMPLE
NO. ANAL. VAPOR %REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SIN.
WELL DATA
l i o
n s -
120 —
125 —
130-
135 —
-140-
SANDY C U Y , orange-brown, very stiff, fine-grained, ^onTesitt_ ^ SILTY C U Y , orange-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
CL
'cL
SANDY C U Y , gray, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand
CL
SILTY CLAY, gray, very stiff CL
!
1 U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-5 PAGE 5 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
TO? SIN.
mm. ICLOQ
DEPTH
-140-3AMPLE mm
NO,
TO-ANAL.
PR5— VAPOR
14 REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
145—
150-
155-
160-
165-
170 —
-175-
002 90
SILTY C U Y j r a y . very stiff SAND, gray-brown, dense, coarse to very
_coarse-£rained, goorJ^graded_ / SANDY C U Y , orange-brown, very stiff, very fine lo
_fine^rajned SAND, gray-brown, dense, coarse to very coarse-grained, poorly graded .
CL
CL
SP~
CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiH to hard ML
SANDY C U Y , gray-brown, hard CL
SANO, gray, dense, very fine to medium-grained, some silt
SP
SILTY SAND, gray, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard, cemented SAND, gray, dense, fine-grained SILIV SANDjray, very densejine^rajned^ / SANDY C U Y , gray, very stiff, very fine to fine-grained
1
SAND, gray-brown, dense, fine lo very ^oaree-gralned, well-g^^ded SANDY C U Y , gray, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand, some sill
SW " C L "
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-5 PAGE 6 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
M 7 5 -SAMPLE
NO. ANAL. VAPOR %REe. LnnOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SIN. ICLOG WELL DATA
180-
185—
190 —
195 —
200—
205 —
-210- t
SANDY C U Y , gray, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand, some silt
CL
CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, some very fine-grained sand
ML
below 185 feet, no sand
SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand
at 196 feet, well-cemented layer
CLAYEY SILT, brown, very stiff, some very fine-grained sand
ML
ML
below 201 feel, gray
SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff to hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay
ML
1 U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-5 PAGE 7 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
1-210-SAMPLE mm
NO.
OT-ANAL. VAPOR
%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses GRAPH-ICLOG
WELL DATA
215-
220—
225 —
230-
235-
240 —
-245-
SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff lo hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay
ML
SILT, flesh to peach, very stiff (voteantelastic ash) ML
CLAYEY SILT, gray, very stiff, trace to some fine-grained sand
ML
SAND, brown-gray, dense, fine lo very _coarse-c[rained, well-graded
SANDY C U Y , brown, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand, some silt
_ /
CLAYEY SILT, gray, hard ML
CLAYEY SAND, brown, very dense, very fine to medium-grained, some silt
SC
SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff to hard, very fine to fine-grained sand, some clay, some well-cemented layers
ML
SILTY C U Y , gray, very stiff to hard, some fine-grained sand and sandy sill lenses, some well cemented zones
CL
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-5 PAGE 8 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
h 5 4 5 -3AMPLE mm
NO,
OT-ANAL.
mr VAPOR
14 REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SLOWS SIN.
GRAPH-ICLOQ
WELL DATA
250-
SILTY C U Y , gray, very stiff to hard, some fine-grained sand and sandy sill layers, some well cemented zones
CL
255—
260 —
265 —
270—
275-
-280-
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-6 PAGE 1 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: ROTARY WASH
START DATE: JANUARY 15,1992 COMPLETION DATE: JANUARY 16,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES
•mm. ICLOQ
DEPTH
h-0 -SAMPLE mm
NO.
TOT ANAL. VAPOR
14 REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses SLOWS SIN.
WELL DATA
10 N
15 t N
20
25 —
30 —
- 3 5 '
1 '
30
82
SILTY SAND, brown, moist, medium dense to dense, fine-grained, trace clay
SM
SANDY SILT, mottled light brown and gray, moist, medium stiff, fine-grained sand
ML
SILTY SAND, gray-brown, dense, fine to medium-grained, trace clay
at 11.5 feel, limonite-stained, cemented layer
SM
SANDY SILT, light gray, stiff, fine-grained sand, some clay, abundant caliche veinlets, slightly cemented
ML
SILTY SAND, light brown, dense, very fine to fine-grained, trace clay
SM
SAND, light gray, dense, medium to very coarse-grained, trace pebbles, sill and clay, well-graded
SW
SANDY SILT, light gray, stiff, fine-grained sand, sonie^ clay
fc.*,fc.",fc.\
..*>.*>.*
..*,..*..*.
ML
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-6 PAGE 2 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
h-35-3AMPLE SAMPLE
NO. ua ANAL
ORG: VAPOR
%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses 6 IN. ICLOQ WEa DATA
SANDY SILT, light gray, stiff, fine-grained sand, some _cla)^ ^
SAND, light gray, dense, fine to medium-grained, trace silt, poorly graded
ML
"sp~
40' N 82 al 41 feel, sharp contact
SILTY SAND, brown to orange-brown, dense, very fine lo fine-grained, trace clay
SM
45
SO —
55 —
" S A N D , gray, dense, medium lo coarse-grainedr minor clay and silt layers, well-graded
SW
;iy y<," "
SILTY SAND, brown, dense, very fine to medium-grained, trace clay, some sill layers
SM
60 N 50 SANDY SILT, brown, stiff lo very stiff, fine-grained
sand, some clav / y f " SILTY SANO. brown, dense, very fine-grained CLAYEY SILT, gray, stiff to very stiff
65
SILTY SANO, gray, dense, very fine-grained, trace clay
- 7 0 '
SAND, gray, dense, fine to coarse-grained, well-graded SW
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-6 PAGE 3 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
5CBW? SIN. mm.
ICLOG
DEPTH
^ 7 0 -SAMPLE mm
NO.
TO-ANAL.
PH5— VAPOR
% REC. LrTHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
75 —
SANO, gray, dense, fine lo coarse-grained, well-graded
SW
80 001 40
at 80 feet, fine to coarse-grained, abundant coarse-grained mica
85
90 —
95 —
SILTY C U Y , orange-brown-gray, stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
CL
CLAYEY SILT, light orange-brown, stiff, trace lo some fine-grained sand
ML
SILTY SANO, gray, medium dense to dense, very fine to fine-grained, some dari< gray bands, 1/4 lo 1/2 inch thk;k
SM
100-
Hos-
N 70 C U Y E Y SILT, gray to light gray, stiff, some very fine-grained sand, some slightly cemented layers ML SILTY SAND, grav. dense, vary fine-grained SM SAND, gray, dense, very fine to medium-grained, some sill
SP
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-6 PAGE 4 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
TO? 6 IN.
mm. ICLOG
DEPTH
-1 OS-SAMPLE mm
NO.
TO-ANAL. m"
VAPOR
14 REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
l i o
n s -
120-N 100
125-
130—
135-1 '
002 <1 80
-140-
SAND, gray, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, some sill
_SP_
svT" SANO, gray, dense, very fine to very coarse-grained, trace orange-brown silt lenses, trace pet>bles, well-graded
i,'4Vi,v>,<
SILTY C U Y , gray, very stiff, slightly to moderately cemented
CL
SANO, brown, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, well-graded, minor cemented sill lenses
SW.
SILTY SAND, gray, dense lo very dense, very fine-grained, trace coarse-grained sand, trace to some clay and sill lenses
SM
SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, cemented
ML
SAND, gray-brown, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, _welt;graded_ _ _ _ SILTY SANO, gray, dense, fine to very coarse-grained, well-graded
SW
SM
SANO, orange-brown, dense, very fine to fine-grained, trace sill and clay, poorly-graded
SP
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-6 PAGE 5 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
TO? SIN.
mm: ICLOG
DEPTH
-140-SAMPLE
NO. TO-ANAL,
PRS— VAPOR
y. REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
145—
150—
155 —
160 —
165—
170 —
-175-
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
SAND, orange-brown, dense, very fine to fine-grained, trace silt and clay, poorly-graded SAND, brown, dense, fine to coarse-grained, well-graded
SILTY SANO, brown, dense lo very dense, very fine to fine-grained, slightly cemented
SANDY SILT, gray, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay
SILTY CLAY, gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
at 155 feet, calcified silt
SANO, light brown, dense, fine lo coarse-grained
SANDY C U Y , brown-gray, stiff, very fine lo fine-grained sand, some silt
SP
SW
SM
ML
CL
SW
CL
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-6 PAGE 6 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
mm. ICLOG
DEPTH
-175-3AMPLE mm
NO.
TO-ANAL.
PRS— VAPOR
%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
_CL ^ uses WELL DATA
ISO—
185—
190 —
195 —
200—
205 —
-210-
1 '
SANDY C U Y , brown-gray, stiff, very fine to ^ _fine^rainedsan_d^somesijl ^
SAND, light gray, dense, coarse-grained, abundant ' .mica _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / CLAYEY SILT, light brown-gray and purple-gray, very stiff, trace very-fine to coarse-grained sand, some slightly lo moderately cemented layers
SILTY C U Y , purple-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand, some cemented layers
below 195 feet, olive-gray
al 205 feel, trace very coarse-grained sand
SAND, light gray, dense, coarse-grained, abundant \ mfca_ SANDY C U Y , light gray, very stiff, very fine to ~~ fine-grained
CL
i i i
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-6 PAGE 7 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
BRS— VAPOR
TO? SIN,
GRAPH-ICLOG
DEPTH
-210-SAMPLE mm
NO.
TO-ANAL.
14 REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
215-
220—
225 —
230 —
235—
240 —
-245-
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
SANDY C U Y , light gray, very stiff, very fine to fine-grained
CL
SANO, brown-gray, dense, fine lo very j:oai]5e^rained,_abundanj_mica "slLTY SAND, dari< gray, very dense, very fine lo medium-grained, well-cemented
_5W_ _ • ^ M ~
SILTY C U Y , tan. very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand, minor silty sand lenses
CL
CLAYEY SILT AND SANDY SILT, brown-gray and purple-gray, very stiff, trace to some very fine-grained sand
ML
SAND, brown-gray, medium dense lo dense, fine lo coarse-grained, well-graded
SW
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-6 PAGE 8 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
I
I I i i i DEPTH
1-245-SAMPLE
NO. ANAL. VAPOR 14 REC. LriHOLOQIC DESCRIPTION uses 6 IN. ICLOQ WELL DATA
SANO, brown-gray, medium dense lo dense, fine lo _coarse^rainedjA'ell;5raded_ ^ SILTY C U Y , Ian, ve^ stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
SW " C L "
250-
255-
260 —
265 —
270—
275 —
T^80-
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-7 PAGE 1 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE DRILLING METHOD: ROTARY WASH
START OATE: JANUARY 29.1992 COMPLETION DATE: FEBRUARY 3,1992 ELEVATION: SAMPLER TYPE: 94 MM CORE BARREL WITH 2" SLEEVES
ORG. VAPOR
PLOWS SIN,
SRSPff] ICLOQ
DEPTH
— 0 -SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO, U B ANAL.
%REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
5 —
I O
I S -
20 —
25 —
30 —
SILTY SANO, gray, moist, hard, very fine lo medium-grained
below 5 feet, dry
SM
SANDY SILT, gray, moist, hard, very tine to fine-grained sand
ML
SAND, light brown to tan, dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, trace silt, well-graded
SW
- 3 5 -
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
;iy<,y<' ' :i>i'AV
i y yiV rtiyiV :i,yi,yi,' " :<,y<,y<v t y y y >y<,y<.v i:<,y<.y<,v wy ' ' syiy^y Ay y y liy y y :i.yiy<y y y v
;iy<.y<y xyiy iV i y y y :i y<: ' VAyi,v :iy*y*«' >y<,y<,y liyiy^y > y<y y y v
:iy<yiV y y v
•ViViV
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-7 PAGE 2 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
H 3 5 -SAMPLE mm
NO,
TO-ANAL.
PRS— VAPOR
%REe. LHWOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses GRAPH-ICLOG
WELL DATA
40 —
45 —
50 —
55
60 —
65
SANO, light brown to tan, dense, very fine to coarse-grained, trace silt, well-graded
t>elow 40 feel, fine to very coarse-grained, sonie fjne gravel_
SW
SILTY C U Y , orange-tan, stiff, trace lo some fine-grained sand
below 46 feel, slightly cemented
CL
SILTY SAND, orange-brown, dense, very fine lo medium-grained, trace clay, slightly cemented
SM
SANDY CLAY, light orange-gray, medium stiff to stiff, very fine to fine-grained sand, some silt, minor silty sand and pebble lenses
CL
SAND, light brown to Ian, dense, very fine to coarse-grained, trace sill
SW
•70'
4y<,yiy ^yiy^y iy^y^y
,.*,..*..*. E yy-iy y yA"
. . * fc>* fc>* fc
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-7 PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
PAGE 3 OF 8
PRS— VAPOR
SLOWS SIN.
GRAPH-ICLOG
DEPTH
- 7 0 -SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO. ua ANAL
%REe. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
SAND, light brown lo tan, dense, very fine to coarse-grained, trace sill
SW
75-001 0.0 50 at 76 feel, sharp color change to
orange-brown
80
85 —
90 —
95
100 —
SANDY C U Y , orange-gray, stiff, very fine lo jpedium^rained sand^_some s]lt_ SILTY SAND, orange-brown, very dense, very fine lo medium-grained, trace clay, slightly cemented
CL
SM
CLAYEY SANO, orange-brown and orange-gray, _dense, veryjine to fine;grained^ minor sand_j clay_^ SANO, orange-gray, dense, very fine to very coarse-grained
below 100 feel, some fine gravel up to 3/8 inch in dimension, minor sandy clay lenses
SC_ SW~
Ay y ^ k . ' . » .
k . * . . . .' .' ^ k . * . .
. .' .' ^ >y<.yi' liy^yi' ^y^yi' ^^^yi' y y '*
^y^yi*
^y^yi"* i yiy ^ i y y ^ :iy<.yi'*
Ay^y ' :<.y yi' t^yiyi'
y yi'« :iyiyi'« ^ >y '
-105-
^yiy^v i yiyi* k.* * . \ f c , "
k . " fc.'.fc.*.
• . ' f c .
h .
k . * » . • > . ' . »•*>«•>.• fc.**.•>.*.
. .' .' ^ fc.* fc.'.fc.*
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-7 PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
PAGE 4 OF 8
P3W? SIN. mm
ICLOG
DEPTH
H OS-SAMPLE mm
NO,
TO-ANAL.
PRS— VAPOR
% REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
110—
115-
120 —
125 —
SANO, orange-gray, dense, very fine to very coarse-grained, some fine gravel up to 3/8 Inch in dimension, minor sandy clay lenses
SW Ay^y^y :iyi,y4y ;i,y'iy<.'' ' iy^y^v ;i,yi,yi"''' :<,yi.yi*' :'yy•v ^y^yi ' :iy<,y4y i y' yiy :<,y<,y<,y i y y y i y y y y y y
;iy<,ysV ^'Ay-iy >yy<,y ;iy<,yi''" nv y v ; ,y y ,v yiy y y y v ,.*..*..',.
v'iy^y :iy<,yi ' :<,yiy<,"*' l iy iyA' ^y^yiV :4y<y<," ' ^y^yi^' :4yiyi''' y y y
^yiyiV :<,yiyi.' ' :iyiyi'''" liy^yi^' ^y^yiV liyiyi,*" Ny y v :iyiyi'^' :<.yiyiy
130-
1'
002 34
_SANOYCLAY, light brown, sWf, fine-grained sand SAND, gray, dense, very fine to medium-grained,
_po_orly graded _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / SAND, gray-brown, very dense, fine to very coarse-grained, trace fine gravel
CL ^ p .
SW
135-
iy4y<,y Ay^yiy •liyiyiy 'i^^y^y Ay^yi"^' ^y^yiy ..*...*...*.*
SILTY SANO, daric brown, very dense, very fine to fine-grained, slightly cemented
SM
-140-
Tl
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-7 PAGE 5 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
iLOWS IGRAPH-6 IN. |ie LOQ DEPTH
^ 4 0 -SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO. U B ANAL.
PRS-VAPOR
S P E C . LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses W a L DATA
145—
150—
155 —
160 —
165—
1 7 0 -
-175-
SILTY SAND, dari< brown, very dense, very fine lo Jin2:grqined., ligl:iJly,£gnTgDted_ _ _ _ _ / CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, very stiff, trace very fine -grained sand
SM "ML"
SANO, gray-brown, very dense, medium lo very coarse-grained, poorly lo well-graded
S \ ^ SP
SANDY C U Y , light brown, very stiff, trace _lintgreUQ.ed.ianjL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /
SANO, light brown, very dense, fine lo very coarse-grained, well-graded, well-rounded, mostly
_guartz grainSj.lrace fine gravej_ ^ CLAYEY SILT, light green-gray, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
CL svv
ML
SILTY SAND, daric brown, very dense, very fine lo medium-grained, slightly cemented
SANO, brown, very dense, very fine to coarse-grained, micaceous
S
SM
SW
i y yi' '
:i,y y<,' ' i yiy ' " y y*,'' '
i y y y iy y y ;<,yi,yiy i y y y Ny yv : y y • y y y
nyiy^y
2S
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-7 PAGE 6 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYOR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
FCOT? SIN.
mm. ICLOG
DEPTH
1—175-SAMPLE mm
NO,
TO-ANAL.
PRS— VAPOR
y. REC. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses W a L DATA
ISO—
185—
190 —
195 —
200—
205 —
SANO, brown, very dense, very fine lo coarse-grained, micaceous
SW
-210-
below 180 feel, coarse-grained sand
below 184 feet, pink grains, minor sandy clay lenses
CLAYEY SILT, olive, very stiff, trace very fine-grained sand
ML
SILTY CLAY, pink, stiff, some cemented pieces CL
SANDY SILT, light green-gray, very stiff, very fine lo fine-grained, some clay
ML
below 205 feet, some minor brown clay lenses
SILTY SANO, dari< brown and gray, very dense, very fine lo fine-grained
SM
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
0 = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-7 PAGE 7 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
oRS-VAPOR
SLOWS SIN.
GRAPH-ICLOQ
DEPTH
•210-SAMPLE SAMPLE
NO, U B ANAL.
y. REC, LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses WELL DATA
215—
220—
225 —
230-
235—
240 —
SILTY SAND, dari< brown and gray, very dense, very Jinetofjne-grained SANO, white and peach, very dense, very coarse-grained, trace fine gravel (volcanlclastic lapilli)
SAND, dari< gray, very dense, line to very coarse-grained, some fine gravel, minor silty sand lenses
SM
SP
SW
at 222 feet, silty sand lens
SANDY SILT, light green-gray, very stiff, very fine-grained sand, some clay
ML
: y<,yiy <y yi ' s' ' yiy :<,y<,yiy • ^ yiy . y y y i y y y
<,y<,yiy Ay<.y y teyiy :iy<,yiy ^yiy^y
.'.*.*.*.*.• y y y
! y ,yy ryiyiy sy y y : y<.yiy
rt^y^y rtiy^y .<,yiyiy . . • fc . ' . fc . * •
<,yiyiy .i,yiyi,y K tiy y iiy^yi' ' ^yiyi^' [iy y y :iyiyiy ;iyiy4y [iy y y i yiyiy :iy4yi,y iy^y^y iyiyi,y iy^y^y ^yiy•iy ^yiy^y ' yiyiy . .y y y :<.yiy*y kyiy**" i yiyi' '
-245- SILTY C U Y , light green-gray, stiff CL
U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLIT BARREL
H = HOLD
BORING NO. CDM-7 PAGE 8 OF 8
PROJECT NO: 2416-112-IM-HYDR PROJECT NAME: FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL LOGGED BY: JASON PREECE
DEPTH
h-245-3AMPLE
NO. ANAL. VAPOR 14 REC. LrmOLOGIC DESCRIPTION uses IIN. WELL DATA
250-
SILTY C U Y , light green-gray, stiff CL
255—
260 —
265 —
270-
275 —
-280-
I U = THIN WALL TUBE
C = CUTTINGS
R = ROCK CORING
O = OTHER
S = SPLrr BARREL
H = HOLD
lix A-3
COMC^Ptesser&McKee;;^^
J
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION
100
80
S 60 ci
tn
<
40 w o a: w O K
20
COBBLES SAND S/ir OR CUY COBBLES
COARSE FINE cause MEOIUU RNE S/ir OR CUY
U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN INCHES U i l . ^ANDilRD SIEVE No. HYDROUETER
Page 4 o f 4 3/4. 3/8 -t 10 20 i.Q 60 140 200
10' 10' 10 1 1( GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETER
<^ t
\
\ \
\ \
\ \
i \ \
( M i l 1—I—I r r r i n - t - r - 1 1 rtt n — 1 — ( I I I 1 1 1 1" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I—( -
10-=
40
w
60 ^
O
CL,
80
10 100
SYMBOL BORING (asj DESCRIPTION O #71293
• #71294
A #71295
SAND. Silty (SM)
SAND, Silly (SM)
SAND, Silty (SM)
Reraark : TEST METHOD: C136
Project No. JOB 10969 - APPL, INC.
The T-wining Labs Inc.
Fresno, CA G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No.
UNL^IED SOIL CLAkSSIFICATION
COBBLES GRAVEL SAND
SILT OR CUY COBBLES COA«SE ONE MEDIUM
SILT OR CUY
U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN INCHES U.S. STAJtDAM) SIEVE No. HYDHOUETER
Page 4 of 4
100 Z/A. 3/8 4 10 20 40 60 140 200
80
o w
>-m 60
I—(
m CO < cu
g 40 w
W PL,
20
0 10' 10^ lb 1 10"' 10"
GRAIN SIZE IN MILUMETER
SnffiOL BORING ^fft?^ ^ f%) DESCRIPTION
O jf71519SB SAND. Silty (SM)
• #71520SB SANO, Silty (SM)
Remark : TEST METHOD: ASTM C136
1
\ \
\ \
\
)
)
1(
Project No. JOB 11021 - APPL. INC.
The TVining Labs Inc. G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No.
Fresno, CA
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 t I I I
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION
COBBLES GRAVEL SAND
SFLT OR CUY COBBLES COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE
SFLT OR CUY
U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN INCHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE No. HYDROUETER
Page 4 of 4
100 3/4. 3/8 4 10 20 40 60 140 200
80
O I—(
« 53: r->
CD 6 0
(n V) <
S 40 W o Oi O K
20
«: r—t::
^
\ \
\
V 10' 10' 10 1 10"'
GRAIN SIZE IN MILUMETER 10" v-3
SYMBOL BORING ^fft?^ ^ f%) DESCRIPTION O 71373 SAND. Silty (SM)
Remark : TEST METHOD: ASTM C136
20
40
K O »—1
w
O Ci3
W P i
60 g W O
O H
80
100
10 r3
Project No. JOB 10991 - APPL. INC.
The Twining Labs Inc. G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No.
Fresno, CA G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No.
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION
COBBLES GRAVEL SAND
SILT OR CUY COBBLES COARSE RNE cause MEDIUM FINE
SILT OR CUY
U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN INCHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE No. HYDROUETER
I I
100
80 E-
m 60
CO < Pu,
g 40 w o w
20
1 £ e
1 V
\ \
\ y \
\
A \ V \ )
1
l l l l l l l 1 I I I M i l — I — r 1 1 ( 1 1 1 T 1 1' I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 -r--i ••
10' 10' 10 1 1( GRAIN SIZE IN MILUMETER
10" 10
DEPTH LL SYMBOL BORING ( f t ) {%) %) DESCRIPTION
Q 1 • APPLiD icyoeTis
• 2 APPL ID #706488
SAND, Silty (SM)
SAND, Silly (SM)
Remark : TEST METHOD:ASTM C136
• Corresponding CDM ID # 2416-SB-B6-002 Correspondino CDM ID # 2416-SB-B6-001
Project No. APPL, INC.
The Twining Labs Inc.
Fresno, CA G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No,
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION
COBBLES GRAVEL SAND
SILT OR.CUY COBBLES COARSE FINE CCMRSC MEDIUM RNE
SILT OR.CUY
U.S. SIEVE SIZE m INCHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE No. HYDROUETER
100
80 E-K I—*
w
m 60 c2) S CO
PH
g 40 w o
PL,
20
10'
3 3/4 3/a 4 10 20 40 60 140 200 Page 4 of 4
1
l l l l l l l 1 l l l l l l l 1 l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111,1 ' ' f V
I 1
10' 10 1 10" GRAIN SIZE IN MILUMETER
10"
20
40
E-ix; o I—-I
P3
«
H
60 g w o w
80
100
10"
SYMBOL BORING ^fft?^ W L _ (X) DESCRIPTION O 71165S SAND. Silty (SM)
Remark : TEST METHOD: ASTM C136
Project No. JOB 10939 - APPL. INC.
The Twining Labs Inc.
Fresno, CA G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No.
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION
COBBLES GRAVEL SAND
SILT OR CUY COBBLES COARSE FINE MEDIUM FINE
SILT OR CUY
U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN WCHES U.3. STANDARD SIEVE No. HYDROUETER
100
80
o
>-
« 60 O t—t
CO V3 < PL.
40
20
0
3/4 3/8 4 10 20 40 60 140 200 Page 4 of 4
— t
\
\
\
\
\
)
0
2(
8
10" GRAIN SIZE IN MILUMETER
SYMBOL BORING
O 71051S
^ DESCRIPTION
SAND. Silty (SM)
Remark : TEST METHOD: ASTM C136
Project No. JOB 7105IS - APPL. INC.
The Twining Labs Inc.
Fresno, CA G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No.
I I
100
80 E-
O
t —
>-« CQ
e I—
CO CO <3 PL, E-
Ciq CJ
w pL,
60
40
20
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION
COBBLES GR/t VEL SAND SILT OR CUY COBBLES
COARSE C(wc:c MEDIUM - FINE SILT OR CUY
U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN INCHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE No. HYDROUETER
Page 4 of 4 3/4 3/a 4 10 20 40 60 140 200
E
\ \
\ \
\
\
\
\
\
\
^
1
n 1 1 1 1 1 1 II I I I I 1 I I I I 1 » I' I I I I 1 1 1 I" ' I I I I — 1 1 p i l l —I—1
0
20
40
60
80
100
GRAIN SIZE IN Mn.UMETER
SYMBOL BORING
O 70S38S
• 70837S
DEPTH (ft) ML A DESCRIPTION
SAND, Silly (SM)
SAND, Silly (SM)
Remark : TEST METHOD: ASTM C13S
Project No. JOB . 10894 - APPL, INC,
The Twining Labs Inc.
Fresno, CA G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No.
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION
COBBLES GRAVEL SAND
SILT OR CUY COBBLES COARSE RNE CCVkRSE MEDIUM RNE
SILT OR CUY
U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN DICHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE No. HYDROUETER
100 3/4 3/a 4 10 20 40 60 140 200
80
w
60
ro CO < OH
^ 40 O Cti w Pu
20
0
1
l l l l l l l 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l l l l l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l l l l l l 1 II 1 1 1 ' . * ^ f . J" 1 1
10' 10' 10 1 1( GRAIN SIZE IN MILUMETER
10""
20
40
60
80
10
icr*'
SYMBOL BORING DESCRIPTION
Q 78S00SB
• 78601 SB
SAND, Silty (SM)
SILT, Sandy (ML)
Remark : TEST METHOD: ASTM D42E
Project No. APPL
The Twining Labs Inc.
Fresno, CA G R A I N S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N Figure No.
•.-v.:'.'.----.'•
>
3 a ><* Cd
•••'.•-i' f-'".'"'
-• r
. "'--
'·. ')' i\. ': i .
·.·:
( ~ . -~ :'
,I.
',
' ' \~ -~-
. •,.: ·, ., ., .
. :_ . ·-~ .
\
_·,· ·.; ''' }
. · ..• ',:
. '~'
'·'
.. ' . ~: /, . f'. . "-.;:-,:· .·~ l:
• J' \ ~-
:' ' ' . > I ::""~~
• ' -7,~ . ".l'•• "
• 'J:''.'
", :/ ·~- ~--
·' •' ~ "'·-.:, ,::- /;,.:<~·:.:~:~ -~.:: .. '' '~::·:' .. -_··. -: ·. CQ~ .Pi111P presse~. ~-McJ<~e ·
'' -~~ <;_. ~>,.·~-~-~~::_ -~~: ·.~:~->~:~i~ ' . ~-· .-~·-/. ; ' . ~-- •'
.. ;: ... ;. ',
.... \. ~ . . . t ~· •, ~:- :,1 •
' ' '
.. ::•-
---=....C""'--"--'-'-.C.....Lc.i.,~-"=..u...-'-'..·' ...:.:'_.----:"':~\"':·c.·...:~·"-,·._,:._:_:...:'!'-"-, '--'--'..:L....:CO.l.:.C.:..:.C.C::--..,~~~'-"'-~.:_-'-'-'--'L....:::,:~~\·"<
". "'\ . ~-. ,\ .
,' -~-:")" .JI ';-,/ ~ •• .. • ..
''' ·, i lr,
.·-:-_-,·
,' ~·. c •
•'· .... _.-.. (•
;,
)'~(~~ ·'._;: ~ \ !t, ', • '
)>' ,·
!···,
: ,•) • h --·:-
• "t • '~'' ': i'• •: I ';. ' '
..... ·.· ••. r_.,"..(·
'· ·, ..... •,-(
.'J.
? ~,- 'l _,
·."' .· :.->~ ., '":~ ~"'··.
' ' 1 ,, ,'- i- ··'·'
: ' ',.., : . ' . . ;. . ~ I ,"
:r ·,~ ·' . .. )
·-;;., ..... '
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - Standard Flush Mount
WELL NO.: JjlJV-- Installation:
Projcct No.:^4It? Client/Project:
Contractor: Drlg Contractor: i<£^:'Oi^/cc f^j/,
Comp. Started: jo^.^ / 3 2^5 Comp. Ended: 'Y/S'/?^ I 7 "i^i
Built Well Coordinates:
Elev. Height GS Height GS Height-Depth BGS
0.00'
Depth BGS
^1 3
" T "
rr
7 ^
7 f
I 7r
Borehole dia.
PROTECnVE CSG Material/Type Diameter _ _ _ _ Depth BGS
.Water Tight Seal ( Y / N )
.Weep Hole ( Y / N )
SURFACE PAD Composition & Size
RISER PIPE ^^^keA-A-e.
Diameter ^ " ^-Total Length (TOC to TOS^ ^ '( 4. oc t~.
ORQUT ^ ^ A' Composition & Proportions ^tfrni-,^ o rt-w
Tremied ( Y /(g)) iremied ( Y /CNJ) ,i Interval—• - ^ 7 .ft^^.f
CENTRALIZERS ( (£ ) /N) Depih(s) _ _ J X : _ Z £ 1 _
SEAL ^ / Type /Se'-iri .iirf- -fc',Ur'-Tf) . Source v'.rAe:'-/^V-'H >c.' -. ( RAtr . Vl<r,; ^ Setup/HydratioiL'Time Vol. Fluid Addedt LE?!-Tremied ( Y ''^
ni.TER PACK , Type Amt Used Tremied ( Y /J )) Source f7> t..'*'iryr~ir^ Cr. Size Dist.
SCREEN ^
Diameter. , Slot Size & Type 0. d/O. i-^^.^; lyl/t-c.U.^'.-^r-..^^lu-; Interval BGS .^.T-?/ .^^^^J-
SUME (Y/(Q..^^j^ y z t i l O-^^f Interval Br..»-^ / ->-fe ( \- >- Length I -K-^g.-l Bottom CAP ((;$)/N ) ^
PACKna PLUG . y ni Material ^ ' ^ ^ T ' U r< Setup/Hydration time ! Tremied ( Y / N )
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG • Standard Flush Mount
WELL NO.: MW- ^Q^y^ X /S
Project No.: Client/Project: ^ , T ^ /fesv^*
Contractor: Drlg Contractor: tSeVCf.c
Comp. Started: "V/f/^tZ, //oa Comp. Ended: T/i^ci^j /G/o
Built By: ^ ^^,,„^^.^ \ \K.cl^aA Ur<^.t\ Well Coordinate.i:: Well Coordinate.i::
Ifl ^ , Elev.
GS Height-Depth BGS
0.00 '
E l e v . T Q ^ . ^ ^ Dfcpili BOS
/<f 7
3
//z.
r- I
IZ2
I'2-1
T D : / E 7 '
/O'
- I\t,
PROTECTIVE CSG Material/Type Diameter .Water Tight Seal {,^1
SURFACE PAP /: , r / o , r , ' Composition & Size L-»f-v-v<;-U. CC <C^X
RISER PIPJ
Diameter •4-" a-.t> Total Length nrOC to TOS1 /f^ (-V V
GROUT
Composition & Proportions < •-/-7?'// /?•7 . l.
Tremied < ^ / _ N ) ) . v s - c s - r ^ r^c-"
Interval P ' -f f •r-i-
CENTRALIZERS (CS/N ) Depthro / f Z - i / f L '
Type •^'^'^ i/^.^0 Source /Vir-:r>>>? f<:!.VV (T Setup/Hydration Time '^A Vol. Fluid Added5E Tremied ((f)/ N )
FILTER PACK vx-, ^ I ^ Type '• i -?y---^ S; I f r-Amt Used / / S-A^ I fyly (h • lo^Vi Tremied ( Y 1^) ^ Source <^ s/yi e' T-/ J Gr. Size Disl.__^£££J
SCREEN Typ,.. ^ /VC
Slot Size f' Typp. t^. 1^ " KK-a-e^<;i^U,t? , J.jj
Interval BGS tl ^ -4-6 I 7-12-. Hor^ j-
SUME ( Y ,^ SicJ^ ^ 0 1 Inrerval RG.S L ? ^ - < r l ^ r Length "i-^^^ T Interval BGS Bottom CAP
RACKRLL PLUG Material
Borehole dia.
Setup/Hydration tim Tremied ( Y / N )
lime i .
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - Standard Flush Mount
WELL NO.: *^O0rK~[^
Project No.: q|U|12.-(M>HVki9) Client/Project: ^ < 3 ^ , } U y ^
Contractor: Drlg Contractor: ^P)j^J:£
Comp. Started: l - l l - ^ Z it Comp. Ended: ^[ 2_- ^ 2_ 3 ^A
Built By: f! , Ji J? 1 R tX a/A ^^WU Well Coordinate.!::
•.lev. . leight JS Height 5S Height >epih BGS
—HCi2ll
PROTECTIVE CSG Material/Type Diameter Depth BGS
.Water Tight Seal ( Y / N )
.Weep Hole ( Y / N )
SURFACE PAD . ^ / H Composition & Size (^.^y-'^'^M:. ^-t^ d h . (
RISER PIPE osir- ^ \ i I c-r- Type 5< Uc-xUle- < >0
^ \i/-v<r..K , Type Diameter Total Length (TOC to TOS)
GROUT i Composition &] Proportionji -^^^^
Tremied ((S?/N ) , -L.
CENTRALIZERS ,r6P/N'> r ^ I
Type 6>\<:i . 'g> -/:-l ^4>D (v/.-Cv Source (_f>-tv4?-< -.-\'?\sr tv\ (T, Setup/Hydration Time , Tremied (^1 N )
nLTER PACK..JL, • , ' Type 'tvv3 "T << -<'\ -X\^<fA
Vol. Fluid Arirlfrtin gal.
Amt Used J^&-^0O•\:ty>^ - l-y^^^r^r Tremied ((^JN) 7^ Source <^\g.,.m'g^'rtv^'ay, ,
Gr. Size Dist.
Diameter S^iW'l-W Slot Size & Type V O ( C>'' t.W\>r.. • f;(otAv/-| Interval BGS fl«^y?-^7^ 1^^ / -T^.^^^
Interval BGS I^^Az.-nS ^L. Bottom CAP ( Y / N )
ength
PACKFILLPLUG tro ^ J Material St^f^ci
Borehole dia.
Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / N )
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - Slaiidaid Flu&li Muunt-
WELLNO.: 1*? C P I T I . ZA Installation: f rf c r o ^«^rk /v L3-i^;ll itc:
Project No.: IC?' 1 (Z.-H'M W Client/Project: (^^^j,^^ ^ ^r£>bY\D
Conlractor: Drlg Contractor: j/3 2.Mf; f<
Comp. Started: "j -^7 ^ ^2— Comp. Ended: 7^2.7 -*1 2_
Built By: {lui^^r^ [^\L^r•<k^^ (h.eCe^ Well Coordinates:
c?vef Height ftGjS_j^"T't-' GS Rfev
Depth BGS
Elev ^' -•
6^'
5
TO'
TD:
PROTECnVECSG Material/Type Diameter _ _ _ _ _ Depth BGS
.Water Tight Seal ( Y /
.Weep Hole ( Y / N )
SURFACE PAD Composition &'Size
Diameter M \^cX<\ Total Length (TOC to T O S ) _ _ j 2 i ^ _ £ « £ i 2 L _
QEom: _^ - r -f:? U-L Composition & .Proportions u ip'i: (L u>-rTr<-
Tremied ( Y ^ N ) Interval
CENTRALIZERS ((YVN), ^
Source^ r.'\<r-W< / f^old Setup/Hydratioji " Time -36 ^ rlyni Fluid Addedli] Tremied ( Y /<$D)
nLTER PACK Type ^ Amt Used I ")/z,-^^<^K-> Tremied ( Y 7(H>) Source ^-^ "- Gr. Size Dist,
. \ C-^,Y^^C>.^-\-'^V^<\
niameter M ;vN<lL\ Slot Size A Type . !<? yV^Jk WV-yd^vlVNe, •^n I Interval BGS CgP 9:0-rfcyl^
SUMP ((y/N)^, ' Interval BGS Bottom CAP (gO/ N )
Length 9
Borehole dia.
Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - Stiindac[LJLlualte:"M»ttnt
WELL NO.: JAi^l^Tf ^m- Installation: /nifrc.^Q <^y^^,TT^^y 1^,.JOJ:/I.L /^/^J^^'S /Itcr^cr^^ f""^^
Project No.: Client/Project: ^^^ry o/^ /=Z-e^^Q
Contractor: /3^LiK Drlg Contractor: f^eVOfi.
Comp. Started: "Z^^'/^z. (^^ ^ 3^ ) Comp. Ended: ~7/zi /<? f /^O ) - 7 : 7.-?: •. •f,2
Built By: 7^^ <^?c/0/^J\\VV^ AW^C^ L\Oe\U Well Coordinates:
l l ev .
height J S Height . J S Height->;pih BGS
0.00'
Elev. Depth BGS
/ 2 /
)1
TD: / 3 a ' T
/o
-/2.I
- / 3 6
PROTECTIVE CSG Material/Type Diameter Depth BGS
SURFACE PAD Composition & Size
RISER PIPE Type /^^CZ /^-O
.Water Tight Seal ( Y / N )
.Weep Hole ( Y / N )
Diameter -O- . Total Length (TOC to TPS) ( 2.M -/\i'eA
GROUT Compositioa, Sc. .Proportions -'S-
Tremied ( Y X N S . f Interval.
CENTRALIZERS ( @ / N ) Depth(s)__Z^4_„__^3£_
Source ^>'>rcT^iC I 'QY^C- _j Setup/Hydration Time A/A Vni pinirf ArtHrrt^frCgal. Tremied / N )
nLTER PACK Type Amt Used Tremied ( Y / ( N ) ) Source i-C/P/^/^/-.ITUJ fi\ Gr. Size Dist. g x Z - o
SCREEN . „ o y
n i a m e l e r ^ - j , /
Slot Size & Type Interval BGS /^(:» ~ / 36 >'v>l-~
Borehole dia.
SUMP (@)/N) , , C,,^.V Interval BGS J ^ k j l d Z s l l Length Bottom CAP ( ( fV N )
PACKRLL PLUG P [ , ^ Material X;^ N^> r\\.K.<\ Setup/Hydraiion time iii. Tremied ( Y / N )
2-
MONITORING W E L L CONSTRUCTION LOG - GUiidJLJ Fluiih Muunt
WELL NO.: C^i»w-3A Installation: f^i^eS^'^ S'^/^/TAi&y^/^OpLL SWa: ^co'i^sir 0.=
Project No.: Client/Project: ^,j<./ or /=krs^.,i '^^''^ ^^^^^
Contractor: Drlg Contractor: '3e^ci<
Comp. Started: •%5/'f7 (/^^'^J Comp. Ended: ^/s^J/cj. //ixsa ^
Built By: ^ ^ . T ^ ^ < ^ ' ^ \ \ \ \ U i v A t A ^^J'Xt Well Coordinates:
Elev. Height GS Height GS Height Depth BGS
Elev. Depth BGS
-ir
8^'
C
• :TD: er/
PROTECTIVE CSG Material/Tvpe '•i'-' ^'f^^ Diameter Water Tight Seal ( Y / Depth BGS .Weep Hole ( Y / N )
SURFACE PAP 7-^21^'-Composition & Size '^^'"-^
RISER PIPE Typfi fi^^ S2H Diameter ~ Total Lenpih frOC 10 TOS^ t-^ 7 U f f J '
I
T GROUT
Composition & Proportions ( <r^r^r //$^,r:>^-i
Tremied ( Y /(S>
Interval - •SJ ' '=,1.<: CENTRALIZERS (S)/ N )/ D e p t h ( s ) _ _ _ ^ £ ^ _ ^ r _
SEAL Type / e/-)" '! Source t/f/f^^ Setup/Hydration Time £f_ Vol. Fluid Addedl^l Tremied ( Y / fi)) 'S"
FILTER PACK , l , Type /-f^AiTr^f^rrTi ^.t A \ J Ami IlsPrt /7 \l( V, /-- .<r Tremied ( Y / ( ^ Source ^ff^f'-Gr. Size D i s t . _ j f < ^ £ _
SCREEN ^ „ ^ Typ. /^i/C •S'^ry 4-:^ ni«m>..t,-r ^"JP.O.
Slot Size & Type Interval BGS -CVo-U
Borehole dia.
Interval BGS 7fe^Upth <• / Bottom CAP ( S / N ) ' ^
BACKFILL PLUG ,y Material Mt: X \^0. Setup/Hydration lime Tremied ( Y / N )
MONITORING WELL CONST
WELL NO.: CL-CTT^CL-
RUCTION LOG - Standard Flusir-Mouitt-
Installation:p*p£,^r^r? ^ixk^KWr^j-. Site:
Projcct No.:;Z4\b-l|;2-'lK-^'<DR Client/Project: CJ\ \ \ /^ TDQ f=rk.< l C»
Contractor: Drlg Contractor: £>£,ti\',
Comp. Started: <%-7-^:2^ \^0^ Comp. Ended: <^ 2 . \ (3 3
Built By: 3 - , ?) - yrey Xje I ^ i l f 6iro\;<-. Well Coordinates: Well Coordinates:
Elev. _ fleight JS Height JS Height Depth BGS
"Iff: Z:il£llZf
5'
,5
TD: ;2.H2,-5
PROTECTIVE CSG I | Material/Type ^T^jtA Diameter _ Depth BGS
.Water Tight Seal ((^/ N )
.Weep Hole ( Y / ^
SURFACE PAP ^ ' r-" • L Composition & Size n ^5 <^ C^r^CfCXC..
RISER PIPE I 1 1 Type ^j^J^-^y^'-^iL, ViO Type ^„ Diameter 2 Total Lenpth rrOC to TO.S ^2-1. ^ ^
GROUT I C ^ l l \^ Compositipn & Proportions H '^h ^ l-psrv/vd,
Tremied ((5)/N ) / Interval —
CENTRALIZERS N ) , ^ ^ . , ^,
Type Source 1^ Setup/Hydration Time V ft Vol. Fluid Arirtf.rilO gal. Tremied (^ / N )
RLTER PACK • Typt Amt Used US fe-yg; S~ Tremied (a>/N ) 1^. Source C^\e.^rr\-e^f\-r\.-/^<^ Gr. Size Dist.
"^yP ^-n ^ ]
Slot Size A Type ^'^]P >^^ '•-Ui v-ig,^ Interval BGS ^\^.^' 4-^ Z-P^H,^'
SUME (^/N) . ^ Interval BGS 3.qZ.S-x35 Length Bottom CAP ((2)/N )
BACKnLL PLUG ^4 Material "
Borehole dia.
Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / N )
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - S^gftdaiU Plush'-Moufft
WELL NO.: i*B«' Installation:f^-e.,4>^p L<xv\Jiy Site: l^cpr-^ A^J^^
Project No.:;Z.m^^|\2r(>A-H'(tof Client/Project: C^\\-yj( ~Vvre-4)rvC?
Conlractor: Drlg Contractor: B,£,vt\;
Comp. Started: ^^-^-'^Z- {1C>^ Comp. Ended: g - /^-^^ Z. 9>?yO
Built By: \^ i\\ i^royi^ ^^CJ^^ Well Coordinates:
Elev.
GS Height GS Height
PROTECTIVE CSG y , \ Material/Type t^rOg^ Diameter, Depth BGS 1 ^
Water Tight Seal C ^ / t Weep Hole ( Y / ( ^
•SURFACE PAD L J J Composition & Size 6.-<9K^gXig-., 3 ^ 3 y f
Diameter id , Total Length (TOC to TOS;) IZC?
CROm: ^ I r , n , - L / Compositi9n & Proportions .AMdi'o g>r
Tremied ( /p/W) > » Interval l l O ^ " ^
CENTRALIZERS ((9/N ) . r>epthrs^ tZLP,. W^. C^O
•Source -Ri^C^ U iyKg ;.- ?!. Setup/Hydration Time Vni Pinirf AH/UMIO
Tremied ((J> N )
FILTER PACK i , i J* o Type rA<g -V"ev-€,M SilvcLa.. <!Cr.<A J Amt Used U• ^ Ujyv^uoi^ Tremied ( t W / ) T Source C-l t' '/VN 'g./-/v'r'> <si Gr. Size Dist
Diameter Jil , , ^ Slot Size & Type C7.0\0 * v^«^-^WiVe<^ Interval BGS t •z:.<g» P. b -t^-^^
Borehole dia.
S^ME (^/N) ,^^ , , ^ / , ' Interval BGS J ^ S J ^ Z l Z S Length Bottom CAP ((^/N )
PACKHLL PLUG I/] Material Ci±! Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / N )
MONITORING WELL CONST
WELL NO.: Jfi^CC/r\'4^
RUCTION LOG - St:>nd.titl Frubh Mmint-
Installation: /7^^yi6 .^j. XA.*jDf=ic(_ ^'^'^'^'•Sir.,7A 's /Ic'^i-.^e^ry! /^,r^
Project No.: Client/Project: Ci'r^ o/=" /^^y./^
Conlractor: Drlg Contractor: j^Vdy/d Z>-^''CCr^j C:,
Comp. Started: 7/^^f2 (/2-^s>£i ) Comp. Ended: ^ r / f ^ )
Built By: S . O - ^ i ^ U v 7 u t Well Coordinates:
Height JS Height JS Height
fa 1
TD: 'TO
Material/Type. Diameter Water Tight Seal ( Y / N )
Weep Hole ( Y / N ) Depth BGS
Em.£ y -T' '-i ^ U Composition & Size SURFACE PAP . -f• J 1 , , r
RISER PIPE Typ« Diameter Total Length (TOC to TQ.S ' (r i-' d Cc-T,
ROUT omposition &
GROUT Composition & Proportions ^lf=y^^'^r A^e'^iT
Tremied ( Y Interval
CENTRALIZERS N ) Depth(s) :go.- <r > T
SEAL Type / .c-'. rz>' ' re "Th-L c-.rs Source ^^Sv< //-.?o/'<-» - ^ fi-.-y r Setup/Hydration Time VOL" Fluid Addcdl^^'-Tremied ( Y /CSI)
HLTER PACK ^ ., Type = 3 ^^^/•.i-^f -/ ) v \ yV <v Amt Used / z^ j:i^<. (Y'YMV^. Tremied ( Y /C^) Source Cc/fy i /-.) "7 Gr. Size Dist.
SCREEN _ ^ ^ Type -^R/^ Diameter. Slot Size & Type a .o /o" tirA .<'-U.s -.- < Interval BGS .n.y • g4-
Bottom CAP ( C ^ N )
BACKFILL PLUG • ,/ ryi . Material yv?V? T
Borehole dia.
Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / N )
t
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - SUmdard Fhreh--Mognj>
WELL NO.:_-MW- <r/Dm Installation: /^^/S^S^o J^''/i.^<6>^o^^..'i. Site: J ^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ / -
Project No.: 2M \U\^ r \ ^ ^ ! C ^ Client/Project: ^ i r t - . ^ o
Contractor: Drlg Contractor:
Comp. Started: 7 / z . f . / f i /^/doa ) Comp. Ended: f Z { )
Built By: 73^ ^yuiO-/ er \ \ K ^ ( V Q . A Well Coordinates:
Elev Height GS Height . GS Height-Depth BGS
0.00'
^ Elev. ^ ^ - ^ g Depth BGS
//a —T
/ g
/3-2..S
13 6
TD: / 3 6
I 1
PROTECTIVE CSG / ^ ,2.L ^L , . j7 -v ;M . r c O <L/ T
Mater ia l /Type <Ttfe3.e>r Diameter 1 O Cv^<:-K Water Tight Seal ( O ^ Depth BGS \/t.^-irf'.etr^ Weep Hole ( Y / ( H ^
SURFACE P A D Composition & Size
RISER PIPE .e . 5 ? ^ Type ^
Diameter ^ • • f Total Length (TOC to TO.SI 1 X ^ ^ , t ? i f ? r
GROUT 'Tv^.^ni^ \^^>iMrUv^ Composition & Proportions ^^''^^Cf J- //S^-.\r:^>irt
Tremied ( Y ^ , , . 1 / , / • _ L Interval U H ' ^ ^ ^ - ^
CENTRALIZERS ^ / N ) Dep ih f s l , / 5 3
Source / . a^ j fS r f i J ^ l \W\ ( , .?..^.<- r----^.r Seiup/Hydration Time A^'^ y^ j pj^j^j Added'JL Tremied ( ( T ) / N )
n L T E R PACK Type A ^ a ' J m-?~ / Amt Used Tremied ( Y iCS)) Source {^g/ '^if A)T/.-J/ '<
Gr. Size Dist.,
SCREEN Type C / ^ ^ d / ^ / t l
Borehole dia.
Diameter -f-" Jr.-7>.
Slot Size & Type a • O/(} yJ^fU \A<7.<-J^/\v <; Interval BGS / ^ Z ' ^ - I32.S-
SUME (^/N ),.-^ J'XA^C r J Interval BGS _ Q Z ^ J 2 l } i ^ t n g i h - f r i^Tf
Bottom CAP (($)/ N )
R A C K H L L PLUG v V ^ O l Mater ia l ( ^ O ^ 1 ^ 0 -Setup/Hydration time \ Tremied ( Y / N )
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG • SUudmUriuJi MuimU
WELL NO.: MW- Co/^ Installation: frCss io j!5. '" i?>-^A«>=>-'<I Site: /^C^JIL^/) /virto
Project No.: j^M(A-(l2-(K-4\\^'Client/Project: C r - ^ o/r /^..rr^o
Contractor: Drlg Contractor: £cYC/^ P/SILC/^JC,
Comp. Started: "^/"/^/z. Comp. Ended: V / ' / f ^^T^xS ^
Built-^^y: jf^^^^ r^,,K>t-L. Well -CofmTuTJT^^
' \ ' \
ilev. Height JS Height JS Height Depth BGS
Borehole dia.
PROTECTIVE CSG To Material/Type Diameter _ ^ _ _ _ _ _ Depth BGS
.Water Tight Seal ( Y / N )
.Weep Hole ( Y / N )
SURFACE PAP Composition & Size
RISER PIPE Type Diameter -i^" Total Length (TOC to TOS)
GROUT Composition & Proportions
Tremied /<§)) Interval
CENTRALIZERS ((5)/N )
SEAL ^ Type /P^,r^.,,r:£ /'eit.!~r<, S puree k .; -"/^ -/ ///;/=->/• Setup/Hydration Time , Tremied ( Y /(gj)
Vol. Fluid Added't l al-
nLTFR PACK Type Amt Used
remied ( Y ource i "" ' 7-/ AJ /-I
Diameter^ " ' Type.
Slot Size AVvpe ^.dra-Interval BGS \ /^3-/ .^?'
SUMP ( Y ^ \ Interval Rfig"" - -'N Bottom CAP « f > N )'
PACKnLL PLUG . Material A/ -f
Length
Setup/Hydration time \_ Tremied ( Y / N ) '
MONITORING W E L L CONSTRUCTION LOG —Standard FlUl.ll MwHrt-
WELLNO.: M5Sifc CDt^l-Mc Installation: • Site: Fv-,».svvo S-c.v vL*<.,/ji Uc
Project No.: :2}{\ir'-[\2A\\'^M Client/Project: e . V ^ o l wt,
Contractor: ^ ^ \v \^ c D rv\ Drlg Contractor: 'RUL.V^ \V
Comp. Started: -j _ Ti _e 7_ Comp. Ended: ~] ^ ^ Z L — < "TL-
Built By: E . c W ^ ^ i fAor^s^ / IZcV, Uon^e. / Well Coordinates:
U oc." hor,V^ -7 J / /
Well Coordinates:
U oc." hor,V^ -7 J / /
Elev. Height GS Height GS Height Depth BGS
' Elev. 2- 2 -07 T Depth BGS " /
/ /
A O
V s-
lo"
PROTECTIVE CSG Material/Type. Diameter Water Tight Seal ( Y / 1
Weep Hole ( Y / N ) Depth BGS
SURFACE PAP r. 4. f J ^. , Composition & Size C^tfru;.Lk-XC c. A /Cy t
RISER PIPE o./, ^ 1 \ i Type rV>(— S- c-.We..rV<-\r-- fiG Diameter <T cty Total Length (TOC to TCtRS •^/:> ^\ ^
^ GROUT Composition & Proportions H a.^^ C1
Tremied ((25/ N ) Interval. 0 — ^ ^ S " -Vr .
CENTRALIZERS (0/H )
^ SEAL Type. Source ^' \z i ^ C
Setup/Hydration T«fte-Tremied ((S)/ N )
nLTER PACK Type .9 y £ o 3 r o>NV<-vc»-> Amt Used Tremied {(S)/ N ) Source Gr. Size Hist. ^ ."-S > z. o
- SCREEN ^ Type p y C Diameter ^ Slot Size & Type t rn a'' •s-A-e-V- t'Ar^ U-^< ^ S I Interval BGS J 1 n •(<'<.'Jr
Bottom CAP ( Q / N )
BACKnLL PLUG - /So pVoo^ Material ^
Borehole dia.
Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / N )
MONITORING WELL CONST
WELL NO.: MW^ CD>^n
RUCTION LOG --^StftBdantdEteslpgaettirt
Installation: /^igrs^^i ^/.jn/^rSy lyAiD>^ii>, \5'^i^: <^^.^,^'<; ///^e^Aso 's^^iz^
Project No.: \i':-\( - lVA~U"vlP^ Client/Project: C'/TV 0/= prisSf^a
Contractor: Drlg Contractor: S^y<^'^
Comp. Started: 7/zz.Jc^i_ f^83 7 ) Comp. Ended: '^/ZZ/'jz, f53Z
Built By: < Lr>.o ( T / l f - - \ \ \ V v <LW(;A U o k U Well Coordinates:
-J -J ilev.
eight JS Height JS Height-Depth BGS
0.00'
Depth BGS
5h^
2-1
61-
T P :
O
PROTECTIVE CSG —roTi,e.^o'-i'^r^y^<jr^ Material/Type "^"^"^^ Diameter Depth BGS
.Water Tight Seal ( Y / N )
.Weep Hole ( Y / N )
SURFACE PAP / , 7~ v' ^ ?^ L Composition & Size C^^-^.U^L^f Z - XC y -I RISER PIPE Type Diameter Total Length nrOC to TOS ^ '•^ l^r- K'-iT
GROUT Composition & Proportions ... ^'•!\"'^>' ''^•••: ,r~o.
Tremied ( Y r--\ V C. U Interval O <^ S / - f , r - r
CENTRALIZERS (CS/N) Depthrs^ i-^' ^ao ,&C
SEAL Type /3)€.. yi>Aj irp 7 f7 i-f 'r'< • -4- ^ .Source yoCCC^Y /Ct^AA'^t^.cd . C 2A\f.\ f\ C r., Setup/Hydration fime ^2^^'^ol. Fluid AHHrcU^gal. Tremied ( Y / ( ^ /S"
nLTER PACK Type /-fa^^^nfTSir-f Amt Used /Zr\WU/^'^<^^ Tremied ( Y Source < cey> A/T"? A/ Gr. Size Dist. (g^^-Q
SCREEN c' . y,^ Type /'t/tr Sch'
Borehole dia.
Diameter ^ " -XT Z>. i , Slot Size A Type O.O / ^>Vrt.^k>>NT> ':>V¥r^A Interval BGS 6>o - •f'<^<:\r
SUME « 5 ( ^ O A / (O l / i V r , , / , Inteival BGS / 'O - . V 14 Lenpth _ J A . _ i W > p Bottom CAP c5^N)
PACKnLL PLUG - ^ ^ . ^ Material f<0 f l u Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / N )
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - Standard FhishHVtetttU
WELL NO.: -SBS'(l.£)W\ - Inslallalion:|^^^,ofwi->-r\7>.rn Lp>/r^i^\~' Site:
Project No.:Zm^-(}2. - f>A- 'it)^ Client/Project: (^;-(-^ ^ fre.<=^y^
Contractor: Drlg Contractor: ^^•^y^ { \
Comp. Started: "^-1- 2S:^Opv^ Comp. Ended: 7 - 2. ^ 1: - Z C /7 m
Built By: ^^ . - -Pr ^ ^ -.C-j ^ X A l W U i
Well Coordinates:
Elev. Height GS Height . GS Height-Depth BGS
0.00 '
-^^"i^lev. TJJfAjJ Depth BGS
TD:
3 '
Borehole dia.
PROTECTIVE CSG . / Material/Type rHrv,>g, l Diameter, U21 Depth BGS I^T-
.Water Tight Seal ( Y / h
.Weep Hole ( Y / ( ^
SURFACE PAD . ^ , Composition & Size Ly-y-'^^<i.Ai' Z.'isP.'ji
RISER PIPE ^ - I V \ Tyne - ^ f -WA^^ \v - 't D Diameter S- ; . Total Length (TOC to T O S ) ^ _ ! X ^ ^ d I E i ^ E
GROUT ^ Composit,ion & Proportions \^i>^^ \t^.C<..y~ f^^r^-r ^ [Qry . L-j^r , -zar ^b-^.." F-.-^-
Tremied (d^/ N ) Interval \—
CENTRALIZERS ((S^N)^_ Depth<-s^ ^^7^. 1^7
_ I
SEAL ^ ? • [ »; ' , Type P.'g -T<g''..>-- "^rl, Tg..; i tLTT Source •H'^--*X . - • ' j ^ , ' - '.•.:»- . Seiup/Hydralign Time J^^i_ Vol Fluid AriHp.MlO Tremied ( Y /N>
PII ,TFR PACK Type Amt Used Tremied ((^/ N ^ ; . " Source C'g,-c /-i<' > 'r ', o. Gr. Size Dist S j L ^ i O —
SCREEN ^ f I I 11,^ ^ ^ i l / -Type S d / \ ' ! L d K i t , ' ^ D V - V C ^ Diameter ^ ! V .1>!A ^ Slot Size & Type . QIg> V' - ^\n-e, lg?T-v Interval BGS 1^4=*^" C ^ ^ ^ - '
SUME (i$>/N) , . /} ~7 Interval BGS f . ? ; ^ ' l 3 K Length ^ ^ ^ ^ Bottom CAP N )
PACKnLL PLUG . . / . ^ .pi Material ^^TrAfi V)c^ 1 lUq Setup/Hydration lime Tremied ( Y / N ) I
I
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG • SfeMtdai d-Htisli=*M<nurt
WELL NO.: C^I'A.-<£'(Z Installation: tY-e>5a 'oo 's-i ATu ( ajA ;|l( '" :
Project No.:2m4-UZ.-|M-rtV!?f^ Client/Project: ^ 4-6 "Frk.€)(A.«i>
Contractor: J ^ ^ v \ l \ k D / . l l V f N ^ Drlg Contractor: ^e^J{l,^ VC\\\lir\0^
Comp. Started: T -,2i/D - 2- Comp. Ended: 7~^\^-92_ ~
Built By: ^ l ^ A . ^ i f ^LCO t k'^eh^<^ ^ ^ 6 0 6 Well Coordinates:
=lev Height JEM2-^^=;^Tr^r^
Depth BGS
PI Elev. Depth DGS
1
•JLf 1^'
TD
PROTECTIVE CSG . • I \ xw c-,. Material/Type f^^<iJK f i ^ e ^ Diameter tr>" Water Tight Seal N ^ Depth RG.S \ /zJ Weep Hole ( Y / ^
SURFACE PAP Composition & Size
Diameter ^ , Total Length rrOC tn TO.S) ^ 1.2.'
C^SSsition^ & Prnp9r.ions~t^P€-"ir t^-fj^vv-l 6'-;^gl
Tremied ((5?/N ) I . ^ . ( Interval -f-i^ ' Ah
CENTRALIZERS ((Y^/N) f ' i »
7
Source . Seiup/Hydration Time Vol. Fluid Addp.filO gal. Tremied N )
nLTER PACK i ^ , Type hr\^-r<!./^e^1 ^C\v CJ^ Amt Used Tremied (|^/ N ) , . Source C-1 e>tvvg^ir\^<\ Gr. Si7e Dist. g / - Z - O 33
Diameter » Slot Size & Type . interval BGS ^11^ -^(7 'ZSL^'
SUME <<5>/ N ) f ( Interval BGS y^-^^SfX. Bottom CAP 0( 7 N )
Length
Borehole dia.
BACKnLL PLUG Material _ _ _ _ Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / ^
MONITORING WELL CONST
WELL NO.T'S^IV^ C^O-^R
RIirTTON T,OG - Stanriarrt-sHtrrfrJtteimt
Instal lation:7»f^^2,4^NWvv- Ukjr^\([ S>ic:
Project iio.: Z^tl->-\\2.'l^^-i\?Cf^ Client/Project: C^[-^i^ "^rC-^xAO
Contractor: £ ^ \ ; Drlg Contractor:
Comp. Started: s l i ^ M - L . '^'•^^^ "bomp. Ended: 3/['^/'?2, \0\
Built By:^^;i4^.^3w"^yij2XjC^. •(KQ\ a,- ko -O^Tv Well Coordinates:
-
Elev. Height GS Height GS Height Depth BGS
fed-Elev. Depth BGS
3'
^ 6 '
I
TD: • 7^'
PROTECTIVE CSG , | Material/Type Diameter Depth BGS
.Water Tight Seal ( Y / t
.Weep Hole ( Y / N )
SURFACE PAP Composition & Size
Diameter M-0
Total Length (TOC to TOS)!^:
GROUT Composition & Proportions
Tremied ( Y j : ^ ' ) ^ ^ , ' Interval p - ^ - T n
CENTRALIZERS fij? N ) Depth(s) 1(J 5/'
\ \D '^d\
Borehole dia.
S ource Hr^'OA'^^/f-V^ Seiup/Hydration Time I Wf> Vol, Fluid Added'ilL Tremied ( Y /&>) ^ bKjjL,(cfi.tS
nLTER PACK , , , ^ Type <llc^^A<l>K4^,'^y^A t^O • Ami Used Tremied ( Y Source <r. (g,>^< . -Gr. Size Dist.
Slot Size & Tvpp. .P(g7 t^^.<'.k;,AO- 'SVM Interval BGS ' -^c
SUME « t > N ;) I -1 r 4 Interval BGS T t? Length A >V^o\ Bottom CAP C^/N)
PACKnLL PLUG Material _ _ _ _ Setup/Hydration time Tremied ( Y / N )
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG —Standnrd-iffilgh-Mmml.
WELL NO.: "MW-C£7lfA-7ft Installation: ^ -,155 , L^XwACl l
Project No.:£MlW-UZ_-VVA-V\Vj7(? Client/Project: C i < 5 » ^ <2''6 A O
Contractor: C^XJ^- Drlg Conlractor: ^e^^ii^
Comp. Started: ZlZ.^ 1^2^ WAO^.y^, Comp. Ended: S / Z - ^ f i i . ^l3C?4)W^"^
Built By:^^^^\^, Grfilk /l^-^^ ?^^SiSL/^ Well Coordinates:
I •lev. _ leight 5S Height 3S Height Jcpth BGS
Depth BGS
1 TP: g&H'
T—
D
I 2.^' 2.0'
PROTECTIVE CSG Material/Type Diameter Depth BGS
.Water Tight Seal ( Y / N )
.Weep Hole ( Y / N )
SURFACE PAP ^ -A .,f ;//! Composition & Size L^-->^-^A^. ^- ^- Y I
RISER nPE ie Typ
Diameter Total Length fTOC to TOS)A"Z,'
GROUT Compos^on & Pro^j^ons
Tremied ( Y / S O ^ , ^ ,1 Interval L 2 _ ± £ = _ 5 _ £ _
CENTRALIZERS ( C g » N l . J
Source >v <>rvc. vA C ?(lief\<r\ (-c>v ^Oa \A Seiup/Hydralion Time JLhc Vol. Fluid AriMrHlO g l. Tremied ( Y /(§)) Z blA^:4<i^
RLTFR PACK T^-^^X. fi"^ ( Type -^jc^v 3 Sc\i'AUl^--Sr\i\vlr^9=U^^ Amt Used ^ 7 - I f;01 h • fr>:i. Tremied ( Y / ^ Source (ZJl-g^-g^'K g Gr. Size Dist. 44
™ fvlC. 6^. ./O niameter 1 Slot Size & Type . ^ ^ f Q Interval BGS ?:> -fo
SUME (<^/N).^ - - y ' Interval BGS fiP-PCS^t. Length Bottom CAP C P N )
Setun/Hydration time ^ Setup/Hydration lime Tremied ( Y / N )
Borehole dia.
^ra>-^6jcJrUc, copies -lrc> A<^e. laJ^'Zr
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG - Standard ^Ptmh'-M^^
WELL NO.: C Q A - 7 Installation:-f^('e-f:3/\£? ^ ^ l ' W i - i U?MT;US'"=:
Project No.:jjqli,-/lZ-1'A-flV/;f\ Client/Project: (l.;-\t>>, Pr-e>^AO
Contractor: i^^^ Drlg Contractor: P o,. , \,'
Comp. Started: — ^-'"VZ. 5 '.2X^<:?rA Comp. Ended: 1 ' ^ - ^TL. 2-- "ocS* JIT'v'A .
BuiU By: ..€^tL\'(?vVWc\^'AtW-M( Well Coordinates:
Elev. Height GS Height GS Height-Depth BGS
0.00 '
rO l-Elev. Z ^ ^ - 7 g T Depth BGS
iS7^
I
T P : ^ ( ^ ^
PROTECTIVE CSG , / Material/Tvpe " -ng -e-li Diameter .ID " Depth BGS
.Water Tight Seal ( Y / 1
.Weep Hole ( Y / N )
SURFACE PAP r. , -f. ^ \ 1 Composition & Size
RISER PIPE 3 6 Typ
Diameter Total Length (TOC to TOS).
GROUT . , .. -r- , Composition & Proportions IZJ O^-^ O iV f
Tremied {0/ N ) „ Interval i^i(o^
CENTRALIZERS; \Quy^) .< . , / . ^ /
Source g-Ji»' • ' . .. s ,»>K '...'S-Hr.ir' K Setup/Hydration Time Vol. Fluid Addp.dlO Tremied ( y/ N )
nLTER PACK -^''^^^'T^f^p-'tL.-f^h^^ T y p e '^.^ • .J j'li '•T' r"^^
Amt Used -^T-|07>lb> h .<7' , ' Tremied (,^/N ) / , ' Source <r T~i Gr. Size Dis t .^t j j^:^:^^^
Type. Diameter. Slot Size & Type ^0(P" y^/^-.^g.•^K\y^•c^_ Interval BGS ^^VA -^li^'A'
SUME (^^/N) , , v f Interval BGS JllhAfl ^ Length ^ T-. Bottom CAP ((^/ N )
Borehole dia.
PACKnLL PLUG ^.^oXz, / .'L 0 / ^ Material —rrtTr (D r/7.f^ Seiup/Hydration lime __! Tremied ( Y / N )
• ' ; ; / A p p e n d i x B-2 Regional Water Level Maps (1972-1992)
PPiyi Gamp Dresser & McKeei
R23C
•to . no •o no t o t t O » 0 f * 0 t i o t t O I T O t a o l«< SOO n o « 0 3 5 0 1 4 0 > 4 0 , , ^ > » 0 J » < i ItO 410 440 410 410
FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
GROUND WATER TABLE
LINES OF EQUAL ELEVATION (US.G.5J
DECEMBER, 1973
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5'
KEY
rnesNO i.o. WCLLS
rncsNO CITV WELLS MADCRA l.a WCLLS
CONSOLtDATCD LDL WCLLf
JAUtS LO. WCLLS
I INCH "25MILES HomTi DISTRICT BOUNDARY
FRCSHO 1.0. W C L L S
mcsao CUT WILLJ f lAOCRA 10. W C L L S
CONSOLIOkTCO 1.0 W C L L S
J A U C S I.D. W C L L S
I INCH = 2.5 MILES DISTRICT BOUNDARY AREAS EXCLUDED
FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
GROUND WATER TABLE
LINES OF EQUAL ELEVATION (U.S.G.S.)
DECEMBER 31.1976
CONTOUR INTERVAL S
rRCSNO l.O WELLS
fRCSNO CtTT WCLLS
UAOCRA ID WCLLS
C0N30LI0ATC0 1.0 WCLLS
JAMES I.D WCLLS
SCALE' I INCH -2 SMILES B(w.m DISTRICT BOUNDARY
AREAS EXaUOED
SCALE- I INCH: 2.5 MILES aanm DISTRICT eOUNOMY
If^ 'S AREAS EXCUXJCO
1 J n | i | l | M l n i M « i ' | M M RI7E RIBE R I9E I
1
R20E R2IE R22E
SCALE' I INCH- 2.5 MILES a i B M DISTRICT BOl*«>»Tr
5 H , n i M I 1 If 5 J 5 E 5 S '
R17E RI9E _J R20E_ I RIBE
FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
GROUND WATER TABLE LINES OF EQUAL ELEVATION (U.S.G.S.)
JANUARY 1988
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5"
m v t t CITV HAKRA ID CCflSOllDAUO IU JAMCI 10 WASIt 1HCAIULIII n.AHI oescnwTiON viri-LS
S C A L E ' I I N C H : 2 .5 MILES
a u n m DISTRICT B O t M M f n r
AREAS EXOJUOCD
H J j i l l f l f RISE R I9E R20E R22E
FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
GROUND WATER TABLE LINES OF EQUAL ELEVATION IU.S.G.S.)
JANUARY 1989 CONTOUR INTERVAL S'
WELL KEl
rhCSMO ID O mts io CUT
UACCAA 10 Ul COfiSCXlOAIfO 10
S C A L E - I I N C H : 2 .5 MILES
a u a n DISTRICT BCUNOAm
AREAS EXCUXJCO
R23E
- ; m ' - .[ . *• J- i _ . .
t j
,_ / 1 ... _ ttttS
/ / - 1—
RIBE R22E R23E
FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
GROUND WATER TABLE
I INCH • 2.S MILES
ttuom DISTRICT BOUNOWn
k i ^ ' i S AREAS EXCUXXO
R I 9 E R Z I E R 2 3 e
F R E S N O IRRIGATION DISTRICT
GROUND WATER TABLE
L INES o r E Q U A L E L E V A T I O N ( U S . G . S . :
J A N U A R Y 1 9 9 2
C O N T O U R I N T E R V A L S '
W F ' t K E Y
ricsNO IOL
mSNO e i T T . ^ HIOCM LO. CfVtfOLKMTCD 10. jAhCS l.a
S C A L E - I INCH • 2 .5 MILES
DISTRICT BOuiwAir i r
A R E A S EXCUUOCO
Appendix B-3 Water Level Time Trends
CDM Gamp Dresser & McKee
Well Nest CDM-1
210
206
Si98 (0
194
190
May-92 Aug-92 I
Oct-92 1
Jan-93 1
Mar-93 Jun-93 Date
Aug-93 I
Nov-93 Jan-94 I
Apr-94
A - B - B
wicnew 05/18/94
Well Nest CDM-2
210
206
c o (S 202
LU OJ > 0)
2 198 Co
a 0) 0)
194
190
Apr-92 I
Jul-92 I
Oct-92 I
Jan-93 May-93 Date
Aug-93 I
Nov-93 I
Mar-94 Jun-94
^ A - B - B
wl 05/i
Well Nest CDM-3
210
206
c o 'ts 202 > 0}
LU
>
(0
a>
194
190
Apr-92 1
Jul-92 I
Oct-92 Jan-93 May-93 Date
— I — Aug-93 Nov-93
I Mar-94 Jun-94
-o- A - & B
wicnew 05/19/94
Well Nest CDM-4
210
Apr-92 Jul-92 Oct-92 Jan-93 May-93 Date
Aug-93 Nov-93 Mar-94 Jun-94
-o- A - e - B 0
wl||H 0 5 / ^ ^
Well Nest CDM-5
210
206
O 'c3 202 > 0) UJ
> (0
2 198 to
n
194
O
190 T" 1 1 1 Aug-93 Nov-93 Mar-94
X 1 Apr-92 Jul-92 Oct-92 Jan-93 May-93
Date Jun-94
^ A-B-B ^ C
wicnew 05/18/94
Well CDM-6A
210
206
c o 05 202 >
111
> CD
O
0) 0)
194
190
Apr-92 Jul-92 I
Oct-92 I
Jan-93 May-93 Date
I Aug-93
I Nov-93
I Mar-94 Jun-94
Wicnew 05/18/94
Well Nest CDM-7
210
206
c g
'm 202
LU
^ 1 9 8 (0
O Q
(D O LI.
194
190
Apr-92 I
Jul-92 I
Oct-92 I
Jan-93 May-93 Date
Aug-93 I
Nov-93 I
Mar-94 Jun-94
^ A ^ 0
wicnew 05/18/94
Well Nest UW-1
220
Nov-84 Mar-86 Aug-87 Dec-88 May-90 Date
Sep-91 Jan-93 Jun-94
^ A B C
Well Nest UW-2
220
S a
1
214
c g 'c3 208 > o LU OJ
>
^202 (0
196
190
Nov-84 Mar-86 Aug-87 Dec-88 Date
May-90 Sep-91 Jan-93 Jun-94
^ A B -AT- C
wicnew 05/19/94
Well Nest DW-1
220
214
c o
208 > LU 03
^ 2 0 2 CO
EB
0) 0)
196
190 1 Mar-86
1 Aug-87
1 1 Dec-88 May-90
Date
— I — Jan-93 Nov-84 Sep-91 Jun-94
^ A B 0
Well Nest DW-2
220
214
c g "ro 208 > o UJ
>
o
•
•
o
^ 2 0 2 (0
0) 0)
196
•
190
Nov-84 I
Mar-86 Aug-87 i I
Dec-88 May-90 Date
Sep-91 Jan-93 Jun-94
^ A B C
wicnew 05/19/94
Well W-R1
220
o
o
o
o o
o o
o o ^ o
o o
214
g •5 208 > 0) UJ 03 > _J 0}
CO 202
196
190
Nov-84 1
Mar-86 Aug-87 1
Dec-88 May-90 Date
Sep-91 I
Jan-93 Jun-94
Well W2
220
214
o
o
o
0
0
o
g =15 208 > 03
UJ 03 > 03
03 ^ 2 0 2
196
190
Nov-84 T
Mar-86 Aug-87 1
Dec-88 May-90
Date Sep-91
1 Jan-93 Jun-94
Wicnew 05/19/94
Well W3
220
214
O
c g ••^208 > 03
LU 03
> 03 03 ^ 2 0 2
CJD
O
O O O
03 03
o o _ Q .
196
190
O
o
Nov-84 I
Mar-86 Aug-87 I
Dec-88
Date
— \ — May-90 Sep-91 Jan-93 Jun-94
94
Well W4
220
214
g '15 208 > 03 UJ 03 > 03
03 ^ 2 0 2
O
o o
03 03
196
O
O
190 1
Mar-86
1
Jan-93 Nov-84 Aug-87 I 1
Dec-88 May-90
Date Sep-91 Jun-94
wicnew 05/19/94
Well W5
220
214
O
c g CO 208 I UJ 03 > 03
03 to 202 5
o o
03
- O -" O "
196
190 1 Aug-87
— I — Sep-91 Nov-84
I Mar-86
I I Dec-88 May-90
Date
1 Jan-93 Jun-94
wicnew 05/19/94
Well W6
220
214
g 'to 208
UJ 03 > 03
03 To 202
03
_Q_
O
196
190
Nov-84 1
Mar-86 Aug-87 I I
Dec-88 May-90 Date
Sep-91 I
Jan-93 Jun-94
wicnew 05/19/94
Well MW-1
220
214
c g 'to 208 >
LU 03 > 03
03 15 202
O O
03 03 LJL
O o
O O
196
190 1 Aug-87
\ Dec-88
1 May-90 Nov-84 Mar-86
Date Sep-91
I Jan-93 Jun-94
wicnew 05/19/94
Well MW-2
220
214
_g CO
> 03 LU 03 > 03
03
O O
208 o
O 03 03
U-
^ 2 0 2 O
T J O O O o O o
196
190
Nov-84 I
Mar-86 Aug-87 Dec-88 May-90
Date Sep-91
I Jan-93 Jun-94
wicnew 05/19/94
Well MW-3
220
214
c g ••S3 208 > 03
UJ 03 > 03
03
13 202
o o
O
03 03
O o
196
O O
190
Nov-84 Mar-86 I
Aug-87 Dec-88 May-90
Date Sep-91
I Jan-93 Jun-94
Well MW-4
220
214
O O
g is 208 > 03
03 > 03
03 « 2 0 2
C3
03 03 U.
o
196
190 1
Mar-86
1
Aug-87 Nov-84 I
Dec-88
Date May-90
1 Sep-91
I Jan-93 Jun-94
wicnew 05/19/94
Well OW-1
220
214
c g ••5 208
I LU
•5
03 13 202
o
196
190 1 Dec-88 Nov-84
I Mar-86 Aug-87
Date May-90 Sep-91 Jan-93 Jun-94
Wicnew 05/19/94
Well EW-1
220
214
O
g '13 208 > 03 lU "53 > 03
03
13 202
03 03
196
O
190 1
Aug-87
1 1
Dec-88 May-90
Date
— I —
Sep-91 Nov-84 Mar-86 I
Jan-93 Jun-94
wicnew 05/19/94
Appendix B-4 Irrigation Data
CDM Gamp Dresser &. McKee
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TO; Frank Winslow
FROM; Jason Preece
DATE: June 10, 1993
SUBJECT: A g r i c u l t u r a l Land Use and I r r i g a t i o n Practices i n the V i c i n i t y of Fresno Sanitary L a n d f i l l
INTRODUCTION
In an e f f o r t to characterize the effects of a g r i c u l t u r a l land use on the groundwater regime i n the v i c i n i t y of the Fresno Sanitary L a n d f i l l (FSL), the following l i m i t e d information i s provided that relates to the use of i r r i g a t i o n water from wells and the Fresno Colony Canal, This information w i l l help determine groundwater pumpage output from the underlying aquifer and i n f i l t r a t i o n factors from i r r i g a t i o n practices.
One of the underlying p r i n c i p l e s guiding assumptions made i n the estimates of groundwater use i s that farmers most often w i l l use canal water to i r r i g a t e crops when available and turn to pumping groundwater from wells when the canal water i s not available. This i s simply because the canal water costs less to use. Occasionally, groundwater i s used to supplement the canal water supply. Therefore, a his t o r y of canal water a v a i l a b i l i t y i s f i r s t presented because of the way canal water supply relates to groundwater pumping. Then, narrative descriptions of i r r i g a t i o n practices and a g r i c u l t u r a l land use for s i g n i f i c a n t land parcels surrounding the l a n d f i l l are given to determine crop water demand and duration of i r r i g a t i o n . This i s then followed by a formulation of pumpage with respect to time for each of the l o c a l i r r i g a t i o n wells.
Some of the missing elements of th i s characterization included the lack of s p e c i f i c knowledge of how generous the area farmers are i n i r r i g a t i n g t h e i r crops and a thorough h i s t o r y of which crops have been c u l t i v a t e d on the parcels where "row crops" are grown. Row crops refer to crops that are commonly rotated between growing seasons, such as vegetables, cotton, alfalfa,and grain crops. Grape vineyards, on the other hand, are stable and have existed for long periods depending on t h e i r maturity. Where as the type of crop grown generally determines the duration and amount of i r r i g a t i n g , the farmer's judgement adds to or negates from the actual amounts.
FRESNO COLONY CANAL OPERATION
The Fresno I r r i g a t i o n D i s t r i c t (FID) owns and operates the Fresno Colony Canal that serves the majority of the area surrounding the l a n d f i l l (See Figure 1, A g r i c u l t u r a l Land Use Map). The canal
TABLE 1
FRESNO COLONY CANAL OPERATIONAL PERIODS
YEAR PRIMARY PERIOD SECONDARY PERIOD
1992 A p r i l 1 to July 15
1991 A p r i l 16 to Aug. 15
1990 March 1 to A p r i l 15 June 1 to Ju l y 31
1989 March 1 to July 31
1988 March 1 to A p r i l 30 May 15 to July 31
1987 March 1 to March 31 May 1 to Ju l y 31
1986 March 1 to Aug. 31
1985 March 1 to Aug. 31
1984 March 1 to Sept. 30
1983 A p r i l 1 to Sept. 3 0
1982 March 1 to Sept. 3 0
1981 March 1 to Aug. 31
1980 March 1 to Sept. 30
1979 March 1 to Sept. 30
1978 March 1 to Oct. 31
1977 June 1 to July 31
1976 May 1 to July 31
1975 March 1 to Sept. 30
1974 March 1 to Sept. 30
1973 March 1 to Sept, 30
1972 March 1 to July 31
1971 March 1 to Sept. 30
1970 March 1 to Aug. 31
1969 March 1 to Oct. 31
1968 March 1 to July 31
1967 March 1 to Oct. 31
1966 March 1 to Ju l y 31
1965 March 1 to Aug.. 31
runs west along the Annadale Road alignment i n an open d i t c h to a location close to monitoring well CDM-1 and i r r i g a t i o n well I I where i t enters a large diameter pipe. At the inter s e c t i o n of Annadale and West Avenue, the canal water emerges from the pipe and turns due south and flows along the east side of West Avenue u n t i l i t turns southwest some 500 feet past North Avenue, An 18-inch diameter pipe carries canal water to the west side of the • l a n d f i l l , FID was contacted to determine the h i s t o r i c a l operation of the canal. Canal operation data i s available back to 1921 but only data back to 1965 i s presented and thought to be s u f f i c i e n t considering the degree of refinement i n t h i s characterization e f f o r t . According to them, water was supplied to the canal over the periods from 1992 back to 1965 as presented i n Table 1, In addition, FID states that the 18-inch diameter pipe i s capable of producing four (4) to s i x (6) cubic feet of water per second when i n f u l l operation.
By far, March 1 i s the t r a d i t i o n a l .startup date for the Fresno Colony Canal, with exceptions noted during low p r e c i p i t a t i o n years i n 1976, 1977, 1983 and 1990 to 1992, Shutdown dates t y p i c a l l y occurred at the end of the months of July, August and September and occasionally water supplied to the end of October which generally marks the end of the i r r i g a t i o n season. Intermediate shutdown periods occurred i n the years of 1987, 1988 and 1990 i n order to maintain water levels i n the D i s t r i c t ' s main water supply. Pine F l a t Reservoir, p r i o r to the majority of the Spring snowpack melt.
IRRIGATION PRACTICES
For the most part, i n the v i c i n i t y of the Fresno Sanitary L a n d f i l l , grape vineyards l i e i n the northern half and row crops are grown i n the southern half, as well as, out to the West i n the down-gradient groundwater d i r e c t i o n from the l a n d f i l l . S i g n i f i c a n t parcels of land with respect to influence on the contamination plume at the l a n d f i l l are designated on Figure 1, Ag r i c u l t u r a l Land Use Map, Vineyards are designated VI through V4 and row crop f i e l d s are designated Rl through R6 on the map. In addition, s i g n i f i c a n t i r r i g a t i o n wells, designated I I through 17, and the Fresno Colony Canal are shown on the map. Personal knowledge of the f i e l d s , wells and i r r i g a t i o n conduits, gained during RI/FS f i e l d work by way of s i t e reconnaissance and discussions with l o c a l farmers, has been used to determine the following relationships between each i r r i g a t i o n well and the surrounding, served, crop'fields.
I r r i g a t i o n Well I I - I r r i g a t i o n well I I s t r i c t l y serves vineyard VI through underground piping that runs along the east edge of the vineyard. Vineyard VI can be feed by canal water through the same underground piping. No information could be obtained concerning the well's construction. The well pump i s rated at 40 horsepower (Hp) and capable of producing about 1500 gallons per minute (gpm).
I r r i g a t i o n Well 12 - I r r i g a t i o n well 12 s t r i c t l y serves row crop f i e l d R l , During the past two years, strawberries and vegetables have been in t e r m i t t e n t l y grown on R l , State records indicate the well to have been i n s t a l l e d i n 1951 and to be 158 feet deep with 143 feet of casing as compiled by Earth Sciences Associates i n 1988 (Their well designation and the State's well designation i s P-53), The well diameter i s 6 inches and i s l i s t e d for domestic use. I t i s believed that i n more recent times, the w e l l has been used for i r r i g a t i n g . The wells output i s estimated to be between 100 and 200 gpm. F i e l d Rl can not be served by canal water.
I r r i g a t i o n Well 13 - This well i s used to s t r i c t l y serve vineyard V2 through underground piping that runs the length of the eastern edge of the vineyard. Vineyard V2 can also be served from i r r i g a t i o n well 16 or the Fresno Colony Canal v i a an 18-inch diameter pipe that runs under the l a n d f i l l along the Annadale alignment and emerges at 16, However, i r r i g a t i o n w e l l 16 i s pr i m a r i l y used for f i e l d s R2 through R5 when i t s operation i s required. No information has been obtained on the design of i r r i g a t i o n well 13,
I r r i g a t i o n Well 14 - I r r i g a t i o n w e l l 14 i s used to serve vineyard V3 and f i e l d s R2 through R4, Water from th i s w e l l can be used i n conjunction with water from i r r i g a t i o n wells 15 and 16 on a piping network to serve f i e l d s R2 through R5. Vineyard V3 can be served by canal water v i a the same piping network. Well 14 has a 50 Hp pump capable of producing 1600 gpm. The pump i s 5 years old and was l i k e l y preceded by a smaller pump. The we l l depth i s 160 feet and i s l i k e l y open bottom with an estimated casing length of 120 to 130 feet given that casing i s t y p i c a l l y driven to a desired depth and "landed" on a competent clay layer then the well i s d r i l l e d deeper through one or two permeable sand layers.
I r r i g a t i o n Well 15 - I r r i g a t i o n w e l l 15 i s used i n conjunction with wells 14 and 16 to serve f i e l d s R2 through R5. Addi t i o n a l l y , w e l l 15 i s occasionally used to f i l l a ranch water truck for spraying on d i r t roads between the f i e l d s and the dairy ranch west of f i e l d R2. Well 15 has a 30 Hp pump capable of producing an estimated 1000 gpm. No data was obtained on the age and construction of t h i s w e l l .
I r r i g a t i o n Well 16 - Also referred to as well U-16 by Camp Dresser and McKee and others, i r r i g a t i o n well 16 i s used i n conjunction with wells 14 and 15 to i r r i g a t e f i e l d s R2 through R5. When pumping i s required ( i . e . when canal water i s not ava i l a b l e ) , most often a l l three wells are l i k e l y required to i r r i g a t e f i e l d s R2 through R5. However, that may not always -be the case since planting and harvesting of crops throughout the f i e l d s takes place at d i f f e r e n t times and not a l l f i e l d s are always planted. I f an estimate of which wel l i s used most often i s made, w e l l 16 would be that w e l l since i t i s furthest upgradient and at the highest surface elevation. Well 16 has a 40 Hp pump measured at producing an average flow 1566 gpm on
A p r i l 7, 1993, New pump boles were i n s t a l l e d i n the 179 foot deep well i n Spring, 1992, The casing length i s estimated at 150 to 160 feet i n length. Original age of the well i s not know.
I r r i g a t i o n Well 17 - Well 17 has been te n t a t i v e l y i d e n t i f i e d to serve vineyard V4 when canal water i s not supplied. Well 17 i s believed to be a r e l a t i v e l y old well not recognized by some previous investigators. Information should be obtained on t h i s well concerning design and usage hi s t o r y due to i t s proximity to the l a n d f i l l .
ESTIMATES OF GROUNDWATER PUMPAGE
On A p r i l 8, 1993, a discussion with Mr. Joe Souza, who owns and operates i r r i g a t i o n wells I I , 13, 14, 15 and 16 as well as vineyards VI, V2 and V3 and f i e l d s R2 through R5, gave some insight as to the amount of groundwater usage i n the v i c i n i t y of the l a n d f i l l . He stated that i n 1993 he does not expect to need well water since estimates of the snowpack indicate a long canal water season. He said that l a s t year, af t e r July 1, he had to pump his wells (three wells i n network, 14, 15 and 16) i n order to i r r i g a t e f i e l d s R2 through R5, At the time, he was growing a l f a l f a , where as, he w i l l be growing corn i n 1993, He said he rotates between a l f a l f a , corn, hay and sometimes cotton on the four f i e l d s . He had planted hay i n f a l l , 1992 that was ready for harvest i n two weeks. Mr, Souza stated that l a s t year a f t e r the canal water ran out, he had to pump a l l three wells for seven (7) days continuously i n order to i r r i g a t e the four f i e l d s of a l f a l f a . He said that af t e r the seven days of watering, he would wait seven (7) to ten (10) days before s t a r t i n g the i r r i g a t i o n process over again. The following c a l c u l a t i o n has been made to determine the amount of water required to i r r i g a t e the four f i e l d s :
Total output rate for three wells 14 @ 1,600 gpm 15 @ 1,000 gpm
-t- 16 @ 1.566 gpm 4,166 gpm
Total volume for seven days 4,166 gpm (Rate X Period) x 10,080 minutes/7 davs
41,993,280 gallons or since,
325,931,4 gallons = one acre-foot
I t appears to take 128.3 acre-feet of water to i r r i g a t e the four f i e l d s of t o t a l area eg[ual to 242.3 acres for the given 10 to 16 day period i n CTuly for h i s a l f a l f a crop.
I t appears that the a l f a l f a crop requires approximately 6.35 inches (128.3 acre-feet/242,3 acres) of water per 14 to 17 day
watering cycle during t h i s period i n July, This i s equivalent to an average of 0.41 inches per day during peak consumptive use. In order to add v a l i d i t y to Mr. Souza's statement, the following information was derived from research presented i n Orson W. Israelsen and Vaughn E. Hansen's 1962 version of " I r r i g a t i o n P r i n c i p l e s and Practices,"
The region i n which the FSL i s located i n , and i s comparable to (given a mean monthly temperature i n July of 80,9 degrees Fahrenheit and 345 f r o s t - f r e e days per year according to the U,S. Dept, of Commerce, 1980), i s s i m i l a r to Israelsen and Hansen,s Area 3, the Central Valley - C a l i f o r n i a and Valleys East Side of Cascade Mountains as depicted i n t h e i r Figure 11.9 and Table 11,13, Table 11.13, Total Consumptive Use and Peak Daily Use, Western United States for area 3 l i s t s a t o t a l seasonal use of 40,0 inches and a peak d a i l y use 0,30 inches for a l f a l f a . However for Area. 4, Intermountain, Desert, and Western High Plains, the seasonal use i s 52.0 inches and peak d a i l y use i s 0,40 inches.
Comparison of the figures indicates that Mr. Souza appears to apply somewhat more than the average amount of water to his plants for the area he farms i n . For the purposes of pumpage estimates and data extraction from Israelsen and Hansen's table, an average between Areas 3 and 4 w i l l be used. The following consumptive uses for crops grown i n the v i c i n i t y of the FSL are given.
Crop Seasonal Use (inches)
Peak Daily Use (inches)
A l f a l f a 46.0 0,35
Pasture (hay) 42.0 0,35
Corn 26.0 0,35
Cotton 29.0 0.30
Grapes (vineyard) 35,0 0.26
I t i s i n t e r e s t i n g to note that i f the same four f i e l d s were to be i r r i g a t e d with canal water supplied at 4 to 6 cubic feet per second through the 18-inch diameter pipe that runs under the l a n d f i l l , i t would take approximately 10 to 16 days to i r r i g a t e the f i e l d s . This means that during the peak use times (midsummer) the canal water would have to go on continuously and/or may need to be supplemented by well water, p a r t i c u l a r l y since the 18-inch pipe would also need to serve vineyards V2 and V3. The i r r i g a t i o n d i s t r i c t says that the 18-inch pipe use-rating i s 20 days/month.
i r r i g a t i o n well use for each of the s i g n i f i c a n t wells surrounding the l a n d f i l l , the following example i s given for well 16 for the season of 1992:
Use Year 1992
Assumptions for f i e l d s R2 to R5 -
* Watering season March 1 to September 30 or 214 days.
* Canal water supplied from A p r i l 1 to July 15,
* 108-day period of water supply from wells only.
* A l f a l f a crop requires 0.35 inches of water per peak use day and 46.0 inches per season,
* 108 days/214 days x 46 inches = 23.2 inches/season given that the break between canal water and well water occurred at the middle of the season ( i . e . mid-July).
* 1566gpm/4166gpm x 242.3 acres x (23.2 inches/12 inches per foot = 176.2 acre-feet t o t a l share of well water needed from 16 for f i e l d s R2 through R5,
Assumptions for vineyard V2 -
* Watering season March 1 to October 30 or 244 days.
* Canal water supplied from A p r i l 1 to July 15,
* 139-day period of water supply from wells only,
* 0.26 inches of water required per peak use day and 35 inches required per season,
* 139 days/245 days x 35 inches = 19.9 inches/season from well 16.
* 75% of vineyard V2 watering covered by well 13 leaving about 15.4 acres for 16 to cover.
* 15,4 acres x (19.9 inches/12 inches per foot) = 25.5 acre-feet
Total estimated pumpage from 16 for use year 1992 = 176.2 -1-25.5 = 201,7 acre-feet.
Review of the l i s t of service dates for the Fresno Colony Canal indicates that most often canal water i s supplied for the majority of the i r r i g a t i o n season which means that a f r a c t i o n of
the annual consumptive use i s the best parameter for making estimates. This i s because peak d a i l y use only occurs for short periods, l i k e during plant maturity before harvest and during hot, mid-summer days, which t y p i c a l l y occurs during the months of July and August. However, i n the case of use years when canal water was not supplied during portions of July and August, the peak d a i l y use figures are perhaps more representative for the whole of the July/August period dependant on well water. This occurs for use years 1987 through 1992, 1977, 1976, 1972, 1968 and 1966, The following correction would then be made to the t o t a l estimated pumpage for wel l 13's 1992 use year.
Fields R2 through R5 -
108 - 46 days = 61 days @ annual use rate
and, 46 days @ peak d a i l y use rate,
62 days/214 days x 46,0 inches = 13,3 inches 46 days x 0,35 inches per day = 16,1 inches
For a t o t a l of 29,4 inches
Substitution i n the above equation y i e l d s a t o t a l of 223,1 acre-feet for 16's share of the three f i e l d s .
Vineyard V2 -
93 days/245 days x 35,0 inches = 13.3 inches 46 days x 0,26 inches per day = 12,0 inches
For a t o t a l of 25,1 inches
Substitution i n the appropriate equation above y i e l d s a t o t a l of 32,2 acre feet.
Total estimated pumpage for well 16 would then be 255.3 acre-feet.
I t i s recognized that many factors contribute to the amount of i r r i g a t i o n any one farmer-may do. Crop demand and weather are the biggest determinants, which i s why the above methodology has been chosen and l i k e l y gives good estimates. Other factors that contribute to s p e c i f i c i r r i g a t i o n practices include economics, water a v a i l a b i l i t y , s o i l conditions and i r r i g a t i o n methods, to name just a few. Some of these factors have been taken into consideration i n the figures presented from Israelsen and Hansen, Other factors have been ignored and are not considered s i g n i f i c a n t or could be considered to negate each other. Estimates for i r r i g a t i o n wells I I , and 13 through.16 are given i n Tables 2 through 6, respectively, along with important assumed parameters. I r r i g a t i o n wells 12 and 17 are omitted due to uncertainty i n t h e i r operations.
IRRIGATION WELL 11
YEAR ESTIMATED DAILY
PUMPAGE
PUMP DAYS @ SEASONAL
USE RATE
(FT3/DAY) (GPM) (DAYS)
1965 62229 323.2 61
1966 62229 323.2 61
1967 0 0.0 0
1968 62229 323.2 61
1969 0 0.0 0
1970 62229 323.2 61
1971 62229 323.2 30
Average of Above 44449 230.9 39.1
1972 62229 323.2 61
1973 62229 323.2 30
1974 62229 323.2 30
1975 62229 323.2 30
Average of Above 62229 323.2 37.8
1976 62229 323.2 122
1977 62229 323.2 153
Average of Above 62229 323.2 137.5
1978 0 0.0 0
1979 62229 323.2 30
1980 62229 323.2 30
1981 62229 323.2 61
1982 62229 323.2 30 1983 62229 323.2 62 1984 62229 323.2 30 1985 62229 323.2 61 1986 62229 323.2 61
Average of Above 55314 287.3 40.6
1987 62229 323.2 91 1988 62229 323.2 76 1989 62229 323.2 60 1990 62229 323.2 107 1991 62229 323.2 107 1992 62229 323.2 93
Average of Above 62229 323.2 89.0
IRRIGATION WELL 13
YEAR ESTIMATED DAILY
PUMPAGE (FT3/DAY) (GPM)
PUMP DAYS @ SEASONAL
USE RATE
1965 39844 207.0 61
1966 39844 207.0 61
1967 0 0.0 0
1968 39844 207.0 61
1969 0 0.0 0
1970 39844 207.0 61
1971 39844 207.0 30
Average of Above 28460 147.8 39.1
1972 39844 207.0 61
1973 39844 207.0 30
1974 39844 207.0 30
1975 39844 207.0 30
Average of Above 39844 207.0 37.8
1976 39844 207.0 122
1977 39844 207.0 153
Average of Above 39844 207.0 137.5
1978 0 0.0 0
1979 39844 207.0 30
1980 39844 207.0 30
1981 39844 207.0 61
1982 39844 207.0 30
1983 39844 207.0 62
1984 39844 207.0 30
1985 39844 207.0 61
1986 39844 207.0 61
Average of Above 35417 184.0 40.6
1987 39844 207.0 91 1988 39844 207.0 76
1989 39844 207.0 60 1990 39844 207.0 107 1991 39844 207.0 107 1992 39844 207.0 93
Average of Above 39844 207.0 89.0
IRRIGATION WELL 14
YEAR
TOTAL
ESTIMATED
DAILY
PUMPAGE
(FT3/DAY) (GPM)
PUMP DAYS
@ SEASONAL
USE RATE
1965 119674 621.6 61
1966 77607 403.1 61
1967 0 0.0 0
1968 130191 676.3 61
1969 0 0.0 0
1970 77607 403.1 61
1971 9248 48.0 30
Average of Above 59190 307.5 39.1
1972 130191 676.3 61
1973 9248 48.0 30
1974 9248 48.0 30
1975 9248 48.0 30
Average of Above 39484 205.1 37.8
1976 130191 676.3 122
1977 119674 621.6 153
Average of Above 124933 649.0 137.5
1978 0 0.0 0
1979 9248 48.0 30
1980 9248 48.0 30
1981 119674 621.6 61
1982 9248 48.0 30
1983 85495 444.1 62
1984 9248 48.0 30
1985 119674 621.6 61
1986 77607 403.1 61
Average of Above 48827 253.6 40.6
1987 85495 444.1 91
1988 130191 676.3 76 1989 119674 621.6 60 1990 77607 403.1 107 1991 85495 444.1 107 1992 130191 676.3 93
Average of Above 104776 544.3 89.0
IRRIGATION WELL 15
YEAR ESTIMATED
DAILY
PUMPAGE
PUMP DAYS
@ SEASONAL
USE RATE
(FT3/DAY) (GPM)
1965 60747 316 31
1966 37605 195 31
1967 0 0 0
1968 66532 346 31
1969 0 0 0
1970 37605 195 31
1971 0 0 0
Average of Above 28927 150.3 17.7
1972 66532 346 31
1973 0 0 0
1974 0 0 0
1975 0 0 0
Average of Above 16633 86.4 7.8
1976 66532 346 92
1977 60747 316 123
Average of Above 63639 330.6 107.5
1978 0 0 0
1979 0 0 0
1980 0 0 0
1981 60747 316 31
1982 0 0 0
1983 41944 218 32
1984 0 0 0
1985 60747 316 31
1986 37605 195 31
Average of Above 22338 116.0 13.9
1987 41944 218 66
1988 66532 346 46
1989 60747 316 31 1990 37605 195 77 1991 41944 218 77 1992 66532 346 63
Average of Above 52551 273.0 60.0
IRRIGATION WELL 16
YEAR TOTAL 16
PUMPAGE (FT3/DAY) GPM
TOTAL DAYS PUMPAGE
1965 121452 630.9 61
1966 80244 416.8 61
1967 0 0.0 0
1968 131754 684.4 61
1969 0 0.0 0
1970 80244 416.8 61
1971 13281 69.0 30
Average of Above 60997 316.8 39.1
1972 131754 684.4 61
1973 13281 69,0 30
1974 13281 69.0 30
1975 13281 69.0 30
Average of Above 42900 222.8 37.8
1976 131754 684.4 122
1977 121452 630.9 153
Average of Above 126603 657.6 137.5
1978 0 0.0 0
1979 13281 69.0 30
1980 13281 69.0 30
1981 121452 630.9 61
1982 13281 69.0 30
1983 87971 457.0 62
1984 13281 69.0 30
1985 121452 630.9 61
1986 80244 416.8 61
Average of Above 51583 267.9 40.6 •
1987 87971 457.0 91
1988 131754 684.4 76
1989 121452 630.9 60 1990 80244 416.8 107 1991 87971 457.0 107 1992 131754 684.4 93
Average of Above 98961 514.0 82.1
IRRIGATION WELL II
USE YEAR TOTAL C R O P C R O P YEARLY PUMP DAYS AREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATE ESTIMATEI
IRRIGATION S E A S O N A L WATER @ SEASONA SERVED YEARLY Y E A R L Y DAILY
DAYS U S E RATE USE USE RATE BY PUMP P U M P A G E P U M P A G E P U M P A G E
(INCHES) (INCHES) (DAYS) (ACRES) (ACRE-FEET) (FT3) (FT3/DAY)
1965 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229
1966 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229
1967 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 72.0 0 0 0
1968 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229
1969 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 72.0 0 0 0
1970 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229
1971 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229
1972 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229
1973 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229
1974 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229
1975 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229
1976 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 122 72.0 174 7591886 62229
1977 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 153 72.0 219 9520971 62229
1978 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 72.0 0 0
1979 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229
1980 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229
1981 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229
1982 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229
1983 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58,3 62 72.0 89 3858171 62229
1984 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 72.0 43 1866857 62229
1985 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229
1986 24S G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 72.0 87 3795943 62229
1987 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 91 72.0 130 5662800 62229
1988 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 76 72.0 109 4729371 62229
1989 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 60 72.0 86 3733714 62229
1990 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 72.0 153 6658457 62229
1991 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 72.0 153 6658457 62229
1992 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 93 72.0 133 5787257 62229
AVERAGE 81.6 3553696
IRRIGATION WELL 13
YEAR TOTAL C R O P C R O P YEARLY P U M P DAYS A R E A ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATE
IRRIGATION SEASONAL WATER @ S E A S O N A L S E R V E D YEARLY YEARLY DAILY D A Y S U S E RATE U S E U S E RATE BY P U M P P U M P A G E P U M P A G E P U M P A G E
(INCHES) (INCHES) (ACRES) (ACRE-FEET) (FT3) (FT3/DAY)
1965 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844 1966 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844 1967 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 46.1 0.0 0 0 1968 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844 1969 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 46.1 0,0 0 0 1970 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844 1971 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844 1972 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844 1973 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844 1974 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844 1975 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844 1976 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 122 46.1 111.6 4860916 39844
1977 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 153 46,1 139.9 6096066 39844
1978 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 46,1 0.0 0 0
1979 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844
1980 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844 1981 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844 1982 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 11953Q7 39844 1983 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 62 46.1 56.7 2470301 39844 1984 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 46.1 27.4 1195307 39844
1985 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844
1986 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 46.1 55.8 2430458 39844
1987 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 91 46.1 83.2 3625765 39844
1988 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 76 46.1 69.5 3028111 39844
1989 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 60 46.1 54.9 2390614 39844
1990 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 46.1 97.9 4263262 39844
1991 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 46.1 97.9 4263262 39844
1992 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 93 46.1 85.1 3705452 39844
AVERAGE 52.2 2275353
IRRIGATION WELL 14
VINEYARD V3
IRRIGATION WELL 14
YEAR TOTAL C R O P CROP YEARLY PUMP DAYS A R E A ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATI
IRRIGATION SEASONAL WATER @ S E A S O N A L SERVED YEARLY Y E A R L Y DAILY
DAYS USE RATE USE USE RATE BY P U M P P U M P A G E P U M P A G E PUMPAG
(INCHES) (INCHES) (ACRES) (ACRE-FEET) (FT3) (FT3/DA'
1965 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248
1966 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248
1967 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 10.7 0.0 0 0
1968 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248
1969 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 10.7 0.0 0 0
1970 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248
1971 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248
1972 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248
1973 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248
1974 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248
1975 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248
1976 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 122 10.7 25.9 1128239 9248
1977 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 153 10.7 32.5 1414922 9248
1978 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 10.7 0.0 0 0
1979 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248
1980 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248
1981 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248
1982 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248
1983 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 62 10.7 13.2 573367 9248
1984 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 10.7 6.4 277436 9248
1985 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248
1986 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 10.7 13.0 564119 9248
1987 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 91 10.7 19.3 841555 9248
1988 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 76 10.7 16.1 702837 9248
1989 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 60 10.7 12.7 554871 9248
1990 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 10.7 22.7 989521 9248
1991 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 10.7 22.7 989521 9248
1992 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 93 10.7 19.7 860051 9248
IRRIGATION WELL 14
38.4% OF FIELDS R2 THROUGH R5 YEAR TOTAL CROP CROP YEARLY PUMP DAYS AREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATE
IRRIGATION SEASONAL WATER @ S E A S O N A L SERVED YEARLY Y E A R L Y DAILY
DAYS USE RATE USE USE RATE BY PUMP PUMPAGE P U M P A G E PUMPAG
(INCHES) (INCHES) (ACRES) (ACRE-FEET) (FT3) (FT3/DAY
1965 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 93.0 78.6 3423226 110427
1966 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 93.0 48.6 2119140 68359
1967 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 93.0 0.0 0 0
1968 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 31 93.0 86.1 3749247 120943
1969 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 0 93.0 0.0 0 0
1970 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 93.0 48.6 2119140 68359
1971 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 93.0 0.0 0 0
1972 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 31 93.0 86.1 3749247 120943
1973 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 0 93.0 0.0 0 0
1974 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 93.0 0.0 0 0
1975 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 93.0 0.0 0 0
1976 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 92 93.0 255.4 11126798 120943
1977 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 123 93.0 311.8 13582476 110427
1978 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 93,0 0.0 0 0
1979 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 93.0 0.0 0 0
1980 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 0 93.0 0.0 0 0
1981 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 93.0 78.6 3423226 110427
1982 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 93.0 0.0 0 0
1983 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 32 93.0 56.0 2439903 76247
1984 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 0 93.0 0.0 0 0
1985 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 93.0 78.6 3423226 110427
1986 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 93.0 48.6 2119140 68359
1987 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 66 93.0 115.5 5032300 76247
1988 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 46 93.0 127.7 5563399 120943
1989 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 93.0 78.6 3423226 110427
1990 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 77 93.0 120.8 5263670 68359
1991 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 77 93.0 134.8 5871016 76247
1992 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 63 93.0 174.9 7619438 120943
IRRIGATION WELL 14
TOTAL
YEAR ESTIMATED PUMP DAYS
DAILY @ SEASONAL
P U M P A G E USE RATE
(FT3/DAY) (GPM)
1965 119674 621.6 61
1966 77607 403.1 61
1967 0 0.0 0
1968 130191 676.3 61
1969 0 0.0 0
1970 77607 403.1 61
1971 9248 48.0 30
1972 130191 676.3 61
1973 9248 48.0 30
1974 9248 48.0 30
1975 9248 48.0 30
1976 130191 676.3 122
1977 119674 621.6 153
1978 0 0.0 0
1979 9248 48.0 30
1980 9248 48.0 30
1981 119674 621.6 61
1982 9248 48.0 30
1983 85495 444.1 62
1984 9248 48.0 30
1985 119674 621.6 61
1986 77607 403.1 61
1987 85495 444.1 91
1988 130191 676.3 76
1989 119674 621.6 60
1990 77607 403.1 107
1991 85495 444.1 107
1992 130191 676.3 93
IRRIGATION WELL 15
24% OF FIELDS R2 - R5
YEAR TOTAL C R O P C R O P YEARLY PUMP DAYS AREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
IRRIGATION SEASONAL WATER @ SEASONAL SERVED YEARLY YEARLY DAILY
D A Y S USE RATE U S E USE RATE BY P U M P P U M P A G E P U M P A G E P U M P A G E
(INCHES) (INCHES) (ACRES) (ACRE-FEET) (FT3) (FT3/DAY)
1965 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 51.2 43.2 1883142 60747
1966 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 51.2 26.8 1165755 37605
1967 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0
1968 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 31 51.2 47.3 2062489 66532
1969 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 0 51.2 0.0 0 0
1970 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 51.2 26.8 1165755 37605
1971 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0
1972 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 31 51.2 47.3 2062489 66532
1973 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 0 51.2 0.0 0 0
1974 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0
1975 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0
1976 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 92 51.2 140.5 6120935 66532
1977 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 123 51.2 171.5 7471822 60747
1978 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0
1979 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0
1980 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 0 51.2 0.0 0 0
1981 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 51.2 43.2 1883142 60747
1982 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 51.2 0.0 0 0
1983 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 32 51.2 30.8 1342209 41944
1984 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 0 51.2 0.0 0 0
1985 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 51.2 43.2 1883142 60747
1986 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 51.2 26.8 1165755 37605
1987 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 66 51.2 63.6 2768306 41944
1988 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 46 51.2 70.3 3060468 66532
1989 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 51.2 43.2 1883142 60747
1990 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 77 51.2 66.5 2895584 37605
1991 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 77 51.2 74.1 3229690 41944
1992 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 63 51.2 96.2 4191510 66532
IRRIGATION WELL 16
IRRIGATION WELL 16
25% OF VINEYARD V2
YEAR TOTAL CROP CROP
IRRIGATION SEASONAL
DAYS USE RATE
(INCHES)
YEARLY PUMP DAYS AREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
WATER ©SEASONAL SERVED YEARLY YEARLY DAILY
USE USE RATE BY PUMP PUMPAGE PUMPAGE PUMPAGE
(INCHES) (ACRES) (ACRE-FEET) (FT3) (FT3/DAY)
1965 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281
1966 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281
1967 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 15.4 0.0 0 0
1968 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281
1969 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 15.4 0.0 0 0
1970 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281
1971 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 • 398444 13281
1972 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281
1973 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281
1974 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281
1975 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281
1976 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 122 15.4 37.2 1620340 13281
1977 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 153 15.4 46.6 2032066 13281
1978 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 0 15.4 0.0 0 0
1979 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281
1980 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281
1981 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58,3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281
1982 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281
1983 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 62 15.4 18.9 823452 13281
1984 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 30 15.4 9.1 398444 13281
1985 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281
1986 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 61 15.4 18.6 810170 13281
1987 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 91 15.4 27.7 1208615 13281
1988 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 76 15.4 23.2 1009392 13281
1989 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 60 15.4 18.3 796889 13281
1990 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 15.4 32.6 1421118 13281
1991 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 107 15.4 32.6 1421118 13281
1992 245 G R A P E S 35.0 58.3 93 15.4 28.4 1235178 13281
IRRIGATION WELL 16
USE YEAR
37.6% OF FIELDS R2 THROUGH R5
TOTAL
IRRIGATION
DAYS
CROP CROP
SEASONAL
USE RATE
(INCHES)
YEARLY
WATER
USE
(INCHES)
PUMP DAYS AREA
@ SEASONAL SERVED
USE RATE BY PUMP
(ACRES)
ESTIMATED
YEARLY
PUMPAGE
(ACRE-FEET)
ESTIMATED
YEARLY
PUMPAGE
(FT3)
ESTIMATED
DAILY
PUMPAGE
(FT3/DAY)
1965 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 91.1 77.0 3353289 108171
1966 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 91.1 47.7 2075845 66963
1967 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0
1968 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 31 91.1 . 84.3 3672650 118473
1969 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 0 91.1 0.0 0 0
1970 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 91.1 47.7 2075845 66963
1971 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0
1972 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 31 91.1 84.3 3672650 118473
1973 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 0 91.1 0.0 0 0
1974 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0
1975 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0
1976 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 92 91.1 250,2 10899476 118473
1977 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 123 91.1 305.4 13304985 108171
1978 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0
1979 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0
1980 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 0 91.1 0.0 0 0
1981 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 91.1 77.0 3353289 108171
1982 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 0 91.1 0.0 0 0
1983 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 32 91.1 54.9 2390055 74689
1984 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 0 91.1 0.0 0 0
1985 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 91.1 77.0 3353289 108171
1986 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 31 91.1 47.7 2075845 66963
1987 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 66 91.1 113.2 4929489 74689
1988 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 46 91.1 125.1 5449738 118473
1989 214 OATS (HAY) 42.0 70.0 31 91.1 77.0 3353289 108171
1990 214 C O R N 26.0 43.3 77 91.1 118.4 5156132 66963
1991 214 COTTON 29.0 48.3 77 91.1 132.0 5751071 74689
1992 214 ALFALFA 46.0 76.7 63 91.1 171.3 7463772 118473
IRRIGATION WELL 16
YEAR TOTAL 16 TOTAL DAYS
P U M P A G E PUMPAGE
(FT3/DAY) G P M
1965 121452 630.9 61
1966 80244 416.8 61
1967 0 0.0 0
1968 131754 684.4 61
1969 0 0.0 0
1970 80244 416.8 61
1971 13281 69.0 30
1972 131754 684.4 61
1973 13281 69.0 30
1974 13281 69.0 30
1975 13281 69.0 30
1976 131754 684.4 122
1977 121452 630.9 153
1978 0 0.0 0
1979 13281 69.0 30
1980 13281 69.0 30
1981 121452 630.9 61
1982 13281 69.0 30
1983 87971 457.0 62
1984 13281 69.0 30
1985 121452 630.9 61
1986 80244 416.8 61
1987 87971 457.0 91
1988 131754 684.4 76
1989 121452 630.9 60
1990 80244 416.8 107
1991 87971 457.0 107
1992 131754 684.4 93
- 0
,;,._
·. --.· .. ··~
" ..... ) • : !.. ·~ ' '
"
" h • (·,
~~': ~ .. . '-'·
' ... · ':...:.: • •• ~· J ..
.., •_. ' -
·, •''.,..·
.. ,,.
··" ·.
.,, .
--·.··
._:' '--' '
'·
•\'. '., ·,•'
~ .; 1 ' ~ ·,.
•• c \,,
. ··-·
1 ~ J;•, • 'v,' .. i',
' . '~ . ·'"','····.···'
;_
'•' · ... _
• ~ j >
. ~ •;
c, '
) ~ '
'1'' .•• ·-·-: : ..
• ~ , \ ,' ~ I' ,. , ; '>
· . .-· ··. ~ ·,
. '~ .. "
' :-.~- <
... · /· ~--.,, .
'' e; •,_' (,,' r\.• ,...1
,···.·· . \,_ ···,' ·,
,.
'' ',,
,'' .. , ..
. ·' . . : ·.~ (
·.,
:'
•'
'.:.: ~- -1'. \ .. ' '~ ' .. '' ~' . ' ... ' ·:..... '' ' .... ' :..!·,~ • J ~ ;~ ·,., .~,,_,.·~.:·· ',; ' •,', • •• ( / ." ••• : ( > • ~.: ;; '' ••
'' ;'. ~, ~ '> •• -c~' ' ;_:. '7 '• •
. '"/ ' . ~ ./ ; ·: ~. . 'l ~1 ~ ,, • ·' ~ • "" ' ~ ! 1
r·• '_!
.. ·.
' ... '· , ..
. . ·, <l· tl. · .... ' ' , • 'r, ,• .. : . ~ '·. '/ ;..- ' .
. ,r ••
. ~ . '
.... , .'·,., .. '
'< ~.:.. '
' -~..: .... ' '·
' .,
. ''...'·. r . . .. -. . ~ ~ . ;: .:-,. ·.._,· .... \
... ~.~---~~-._,~ '••'
JlJN-2a-i993 16:55 FROM FRESt D SOLID UPSTE DIU. TO 4881015 P,03 juii ^ o . » 0 INO .UU» K.03
PPPl fRCSNO
R W Q C B 3614 E . Adhlan rreano. Calitorriia S TZC Atcns Betty Vo«
Ctiniple I.D. Nd: Leachate >'ai>-I.
APPL Sample Nu: R14 7H*<»;!jeOM
General .Min-ral Analvfl s
Total Alkalinity.
Hydroxide (OH) tngCaCUj/i. CflirbonoLe (COj) •mgCaCO-j/|j Bicarbonate (HCO,) mcjC'flCOi/lj Huoride (F) mg/L Chloride (Cl) mg/L Phosphate (PO^-P) mg/L .Sul£J»te (SO4) mg/L Total Hardness, ad m^Caco^/L Calcium (Ca) mg/L Copper (Cu) /ij/L iron (Fe) fis/i> PotP»t»lvwn (K) mg/T. Kd^lltttsiuin (H$) my/L Manganese (Mn) ^y/L Sodium (KA) uig/1. Zinc (Sn) n^/h pll 9 20. CC .*?patci£ic Conduce ivity
(fiC) fimlios/cin e- 2i*C
Residue, Total f i l t e r a b l e CJ-DS) «iy/L
Methylene Blue Active .SiibfitancOA (MBA5$) iiiC|/L
SjimplB Dntft; 06/04/93 Report Dace: 06/24/si.')
Page 2 of 8
DATC ktfcejvedi 06/07/93
Qiianriffttior) Method kPfiDi r.f. iLumber
2 EnA : » i o . 1 <? X 310.1 «2 2 ErA 310.1
cee EPA 310.1 ( 0.1 EPA 340.2
yo EPA 300.0 0 2 . 0 22.5 BPA 3!)3.2 <12.5 12..s EPA 300.0
ISOO 1 BPA 200,7 160 O.OS SPA 200.7
20.7 SPA 200.7 12700 50 EPA 200.7
1070 50 SPA aoo.i 2U 0.05 EVA ail EPA 200.7 42< O.OS EPA iOO.7 $&4 ro RPA 200.7
H. 2 SPA i.«;o. 1
«. KPA 120.1
55>PO BPA 1C9.1
Z . IC 0.02 BPA 425,1
Checked bv ^ J ^ . - Z "^gST 7^
JUN-28-1993 16:55 FRCM FRESNO SOLID WASTE DIU. TO 4881015 P.04 . . . . . . . 4.vr.>'w 'd. s> ...l\U . yjiJO r .<JH
eG'SS-OS lp-iS7 004
R W Q C B 3614 E. Ashlan Frteno, C a l i f o r n i a S372^ Attr>: Betty Yew
Samplo r . D . NOJ L«etchac« PSL-L
APPL aample No: Rl4J>7e-923B0M
MoH»o<1 ft01 IHalogarbous) Rpaulln!
SampJ<'. ivato: 06/04/93 Kftporl Date:'0f/J4/93
Page 3 of 9
bate KeCGivcd: UG/ov/js
Datt! Extracted! 06/05/93
Dromobenzene Bxvjiiudichlocomftt.hnrif' Bromoform Dromomf#.th«ne Carbon tetrachloridp. Chlorotoenr.enc! Chloroethane Chloroform ChloroiTOthar>e Dibromc>t'hloromethana Dibromomethane 1 /S'Dichiorobeni.enf' 1.3- DiChlorobenzene 1.4- Dichlorobenxeufc nichlorodit luoromftr,h«no 1.1- 01chloroochon* 1,2 Diehioroechnnp 1,J-Wi chloroechene cia-1,2•Dichloroethene trans*I, 2-Dichlu£uwi li ne 1.2- Dichloropropane ci«-l,3-Dichlotop:op«jm trans-1,3-Dich]orcpropone Methylene chloriue" 1,1)2,2 -Ttttrachl c»*oei huua 1,1,l,2.Tetrachlyroethane Tet raehloi oethtru 1,1,I'T*ichloroethane 1,1,2•Triehlorootha«e Trichloroethene Trichlorof]uoromethttne Vinyl r.hlorJdc • NP » None Detected
e'07icentrat:i<yn ND* M ' ND ND NT ND NO ND ND Nt) ND ND Nn • ND til? NO ND ND ND ND
ND Nl> ND ND ND
NU KD KD ND 1^
Tested by
Checked by
L L Qt'JLi? r.r i on l i n ^ ^ . JK i /1 < 0 .5
0.
0, 0, 0,5 O.S. O.S 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 O.S 1.0
0.5 O.S O.S O.b 0 .5 O.S O.D S.O 0.!> 0 ,5 O.D O.S 0 .5 0 ,5 0 . 5 o.:»
JLN-28-1993 16:56 FROM FRESNO SOLID UASTE DIU. TO 4881015 P,05
oes
R W Q C B 3614 E, AciHlAn Freano, California 93726 Attn; Botty Yee
••Sample Date: 06/01/93 Report Date: 06/24/93
Page 4 o£ 8
•Date Receiv(»d; 05/07/ 3
L>ate Extracted: OR/14/93
Sample i.D. No; Lcachstte ML.L
APPL Sample No: imtJt'*f?.H60^
fiaoiEojinfi Dei.feCLiAon limit- oan.
Benzene Chlorobenzene 1 / 2 'Dichlorobenstenff I,3-Dichloroben2ene 1,4 -DJ Chlorobenzene Krhyl beneenc Toluene Xylenes
ND» ND ND ND ND 0.9 0.7 3.)
0.5 0.5 0,5 O.S O.S O.T;
• ND - None Detected
Tested By_
Checked By
JUN-28-1993 16:56 FROM FRESNO SOLID UASTE DIU. TO
06/25/ 3 16:b« fiPPl r/KISKO
4881015 P.06
K W Q C B 3614 K. Aehlnn Fresno. California 5 3726 Attn: Betty Yoc
sample I .D. No; f/eacliai.e PSL-L
APPI. Sample No: R1457B-9V.300M
Sample Date; 06/04/93 Report Date: 06/24/93
ray»# b Of 0
iJace Reteivcd; V^/07/S3
Date Extract.ocJ: 06/uy/93
MgLhod €25 Rflg-uitB .(BfXMe Neutral and-J^yids).!
ft?jjd Cffpdf? 2,4, 6'TrichJorophen(^l ND< 4-Chloro-3•methylphenol ND 2-Chlorcphenol ND 2,4'Dichlorophwnol ND 2,4-DimeI.hy3phriuo) ND 2-Nitrophenol ND 4'NitrophenDi ND 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 4, fi-Dinitro-Z-iiiethyiphisno) ND ?.• Methyl phehol ND 4'Methylph«nol ND pentachlorophenol ND I hcnol ND Benzoic Rcld ND
s;pncciU^tion. u,^/h ND
Daae/Ngutral Ctnpda Acenaphthene 1,2,4 ' T r i c l i l ovobenK^nC' )<n> Kexachiorobcn',iene ND llBXachloroet^tanc av Bio-{2-chloroethyl)ether ND 2-Chlororiaphthalenft Mi 1,2-oichlorubenzetie MD 1,3 -Pi chlorobon»eine MP 1,4-Dichlor9buiiz«nB ND 3,3''Diehlorobt^nzldine ITO 2,4«Dlnitrotoluene Nij 2,6'DiniCr9tvlu«ne ND riuoranthcne ND 4 • Chlorophenylpheny) <».ther ND 4 • »romophenylpJi*?iiy) cthvt INTJ PiB- (2-chlo4oii»opropy) J<(i.hei- ND tils- (2• L'hlOiuu.UioxyJmeLliaiiH KD hexachlorobutadiene ND
5.0 10.0
5.0 5.0 5.0 S.O
30.0 10.0 10.0
5.0 S.O
10.0 5.0 S.O
5.0 5.0 ' j . O S.O 5.0 5.0 5 5 5
10
.0
.0 ,0
S.O S.O 5.0 S.O •j . 0
S.O S.O 5,0
JLN-28-1993 16:56. FROM FRESNO SOLID UflSTE DIU. TO
eje/? - ? lf-:K' '^'^ l-Kf!=S<IO
4881015 P.07
R W Q C B 3614 H, Ashlan Fresno, California 93726 Attn: Beuy Yee
sample Date: 0e/04/93 Hcport Date: 05/24/9.
Pagft 6 o£ 8
Sample I.D. No: Leachar.c rSL-L Date Recciv«rt; 06/07/93
APPL Sample No: Ri4576.923eOM Date Extracted: OS/OS/S.'i
Method feas Heculr.q lBaoc-- Ng»_t_t,c»T a>?d Adda) :
a t-ge/N mifll ,.Cmiid£ Concent lut-inii UO/L Itomv.t.ion Ljmij, iw/h Hftxachlorocyclopent ftdl t''nv Isophorone Naphthalene 2-Methyl naphthalene Nitroben?.caii; N-Nitrooodiphenylaminft N'Nitroaodi-n-propyl.nmi ne N-Nitrooodimethylaiiiine BlP- (?.-ethyJhexyl)phthalate Outylbcnzylphthalate Di-n-butylphthalate Di-n-octylphthaltttft Diethylphthalate DimethylphthalatR Denzo(a)anthracene benzu(a)pyrp.na DcnsoCk)fluoranthene Denao(b)fluoranthene Benzyl alcohol Chryacne Acenaphthylene Anthraceno Renxo{g,h, 1 )pci,-yienfc riuorenn Phenanthrene Dibenn la,h)anthracerit.-Dlben&ofuran Indcno(1,2.3•cd > pyt cn« Pyr«#rie Dieldrin 4,4'-DDR ^,4'»DDD 4,4'-DDT bndrin RncSrin aldehyde
DPI ect ion i, NT; 'j.O 13.4 5.0 ND S.O ND 5.0 ND 5.0 ND U.O ND 5.0 ND .S.O ND 5.0 ND 5.0 ND 5.0 Wi 5.0 NT> 5.0 ND i .o ND 5.0 ND £-.0 ND 5.0 ND 5.0 ND S.O ND 5.0 NO 5.0 ND S.O NU :,o KD 5.0 ND .S.O ND S.O Nl'; 5.0 ND 5.0 ND ?).0 ND 3.0 ND 1.0 ND 1 .0 ND 1.0 ND 1.0 ND 3.0
JUN-28-1993 16:56 FROM FRESNO SOLID UflSTH DIU. TO 4881015 P.08
©08
R M Q C & 3614 E, A.<ih]an Fresno, CaJifornia 93726 Attn; Bonty Yee
Sample i.D. No: Leachate PSL-L
APPL Sample No; ni4S78-y2300M
Sample Cptes 06/04/93 Kcport Date: 06/24/93
Paye 7 of 0
Date kftceivcd: 06/07/93
Date Kxr.rartcd: O6/09/93
Base/Noutral Cmpds Toxaphene a-BHC C-BHC •DtlC Lindane Endosulfan Z Kndosulfan JI Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxitle. Aldrin
(Bft>6,-Nc-.vtial and AolOijJj^
<;0Q££!2U,j\t.ipjLJlEZl; £ ND 50 ND 1.0 ND 1.0 ND a .0 Nt; 1,0 ND 1.0 ND 1.0 ND 1.0 NT) i.o ND 1,0
• ND s None Detected
Tested By
Checked By
JUN-2&-1993 16:57 FROM FRESNO SOLID UPSTE DIU. TO 4881015 P. 09
R W Q C B 3614 K. Afthlnn Fresno, Califotnii* 93726 Attn: Betty Vee
.( ample I .D. Nu: Lttacliaie PSL-L
APPL sample N0( R1457e'92380M
Sample DaL*t: 06/04/93 Report Drtte: 06/24/93
Prtye fl of f»
Dot« RuctiivwJ: 06/07/S3
Date hixtractctJ: OG/09/9.'I
Method C25 Reoult.-^ fPaee NtLUtrol Bnrt Agirtfll :
Tentative] V Ident i f ied and Ouarn;-I f ied gL.;<.|,(-;undfl :
Scan H 47 13 /iy/L Scon # 53 02 ftg/h scan « 66 30 ns/l. 4-Hydtoxy-4-methyI-2 p -ntanoiie 56 >'lj/h Scan M 149 4J ;ig/L Scan « 156 30 ^g/L Scan # 211 2b no/L Scan ^ 247 21 /ly/L Scan ff 295 IV /;g/L Scan # 325 94 /ig/L Camphor 29 ;tg/I. Scan (t 339 25 ftg/L . can # 370 29 >ig/L Scan It 360 24 fig/L ,<;can « 406 4 4 /ig/L Scan H 422 36 /ig/L scan « 443 32 u<f/h Scan ft 479 100 ,.g/L Scan <l 738 40 ng/L Pentadecanoif acid 63 pf»/L Scan # 823 S3 fir^/i, yean •( 941 40 ^3/L
TTC'o are calculated uji a i: . i iesponse racror vo Ditf ric«iw.»*t. ini ex rial otandard.
C O A S T • T O -
COAST
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
Air, Water tc Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysis & Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology Sc Bioassay Laboratories
San Luis Obispo, CA • Benida,CA • Camarillo,CA • San Jose, CA Ai«heim, CA • Tempe, AZ • Valparaiso, IN • Weslbrook, ME • Indiaiapolis, IN
SoCal Div i s ion (Camarillo laboratory) (805) 389-1353 4765 Ca l l s Quetzal, Camarillo, C a l i f o m i a 93012 FAX (805)389-1438
CLIENT: Wayne Pickus Canp Dresser & McKee Inc. Qie Walnut Creek Center Walnut Creek, CA 94596
lab ISjiriber Project
Analyzed Analyzed by tfethod
CJ-0622-25
2416-112- IM-GRND/GW
03/15/93
DS
EPA 8240
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 2 of 3
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN MMKDC SAMPLED BY SAMPLED DKTE RECEIVED
LEACH-S19H1001\\LEACH 7\queous Jason Preece 03/04/93 03/05/93
OONSTnUENT (CAS RN) *PQL RESULT NOTE
/ i g /L /.tg/L
1,1 -Dich lo roe t± iane (75343) 0.5 ND
1 ,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) (107062) 0.5 ND
1 ,1-Dichloroethene (75354) 1. ND
t r ans -1 ,2 -Dich lo roe thene (156605) 1. ND
1 ,2-Dichlorcprcpane (78875) 0.5 ND
c i s - 1 , 3 - D i c h l c r c p r c p e n e (10061015) 0.5 ND
t r ans -1,3 -Dic i i lorcprcpene (10061026) 0.5 ND
Ethylbenzene (100411) 0.5 ND
2-Hexancne (591786) 5. ND
Methylene C h l o r i d e (75092) 1. ND
4-Miethyi"2-Pentanane (MIBK) (108101) 5. ND
Styrene (100425) 0.5 ND 1 ,1 ,2 ,2 -Tetrachlortaethane (79345) 0.5 ND Tet rachloroethene (PCE) (127184) 0.5 ND l , l , l - T r i c h l o r o e t ± a n e (TCA) (71556) 0.5 ND 1 ,1 ,2 -Tr ich lo roe thane (79005) 0.5 ND Tr ic ihloroethene (TCE) (79016) 0.5 ND T r i c h l o r o f l u o r c T E t h a n e (F-11) (75694) 1. ND Toluene (108883) 0.5 ND V i n y l Ace ta te (108054) 3 . ND
Camarillo lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 & #1598; UTELAP #E-142; L.A.Co.CSD #10184
•RESULTS listed as 'ND' were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practiced Qaantitation Limi
03/19/93
MSD7/AJ778
MH/mjw/das/nz
SJ07642074V
COAST - TO -COAST ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Air, Water tc Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysis tc Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology tc Bioassay Laboratories
San Luis Obispo, CA • Benida, CA • Camarillo, CA • San lose, CA Anaheim, CA • Tempe, AZ • Valparaiso, IN • Westbrook, ME • Indianapolis, IN
SoCal Divisicn (Camarillo laboratory) (805) 389-1353 4765 Calle Quetzal, Camarillo, Califomia 93012 FAX (805)389-1438
CLIENT: Wayne Pickus Canp Dresser & McKee Inc. Qie Walnut Creek Center Walnut Creek, CA 94596
lab Number Project
Analyzed Analyzed by Method
CJ-0622-25 2416-112 - IM-GRND/GW
03/15/93 DS EPA 8240
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 3 of 3
SAMPLE DESCRIPTICN MATRIX SAMPLED BY SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED
LEACH-S19H1001\\LEACH Aqueous Jascn Preece 03/04/93 03/05/93
OONSTITOENT (CAS RN) *PQL RESULT NOTE /xg/L ng/h
Vinyl Chloride (75014) 1. ND Xylenes, Total 0.5 ND l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surrogate Percent Recovery) (107062) 91. Toluene-d8 (Surrogate Percent Recovery) 94. p-Brcmofluorobenzene (Surrogate Percent Recovery) 80.
Camarillo lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 & #1598; UTELAP #E-142; L.A.Co.CSD #10184 •RESULTS listed as 'ND' were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitiation Limit)
03/19/93 MSD7/AJ778 MH/mjw/das/nz SJ07642074V
Respectfully submitted, OQAST-TO-CQAST AlC^YTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Ifery Havlicek, Ph.D. President
COAST, TO-COAST ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Air, Water Sc Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysis Sc Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology tc Bioassay Laboratories
San Luis Obispo, CA • Benida, CA • Camarillo, CA • San Jose, CA • Golela, CA Anaheim, CA • Tempe, AZ • Valparaiso, IN • Weslbrook, ME • Indianapolis, IN
SoCal Division (Camarillo Laboratory) 4765 Calle Quetzal, Camarillo, California 93012
(805) 389-1353 FAX (805)389-1438
CLIENT: Wayne Pickus Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 100 Pringle Avenue Suite 300
Lab Nuniber : CJ-0622-25 Project : 2416-112-IM-GRND/GW
Analyzed 03/15/93 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Analyzed by: RD
Method : EPA 8270
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 1 of 5
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLED BY SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED
LEACH-S19H1001\\LEACH Aqueous Jason Preece 03/04/93 03/05/93
CONSTITUENT (CAS RN) *PQL RESULT NOTE /ig/L fjg/L
SVOA PRIORITY POLLUTANTS 1,2 Acenaphthylene (208968) 10. ND Acenaphthene (83329) 10. ND Anthracene (120127) 10. ND Benzidine (92875) 30. ND Benzo(a)anthracene (56553) 10. ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene (205992) 10. ND Benzo(k)fluoranthene (207089) 10. ND Benzo(a)pyrene (50328) 10. ND Benzo(ghi)perylene (191242) 10. ND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane (111911) 10. ND Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether (111444) 10. ND Bis(2-chloroisopropyI)ether (39638329) 30. ND Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (117817) 100. ND 4-BroniDphenylphenylether (101553) 10. ND ButyIbenzyIphthalate (85687) 20. ND 2-Chloronaphthalene (91587) 20. ND 4-Chlorophenylphenylether (7005723) 10. ND
Camarillo Lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 & #1598; UTELAP #E-142; AZELAP #AZ0162; A2LA #0136-01; •RESULTS listed as 'ND* were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitation Limi (1) Sample Preparation on 03/11/93 by MM using EPA 3550 (2) Acid surrogates are spiked at 200ppb; base/neutral surrogates are spiked at lOOppb.
04/15/93 MSD8/OC09A MH/edt/clr/lhv/mem/mjd CJ05761075B
COAST - TO• COAST ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Air, Water Sc Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysts Sc Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology St Bioassay Laboratories
San Luis Obispo, CA • Benida, CA • Camarillo, CA • San Jose, CA • Goleta, CA Anaheim, CA • Tempe, AZ • Valparaiso, IN • Weslbrook, ME • Indianapolis, IN
SoCal Division (Camarillo Laboratory) 4765 Calle Quetzal, Camarillo, California 93012
(805) 389-1353 FAX (805)389-1438
CLIENT: Wayne Pickus Canp Dresser & McKee Inc. 100 Pringle Avenue Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Lab Number Project
CJ-0622-25 2416-112-IM-GRND/GW
Analyzed : 03/15/93 Analyzed by: RD Method : EPA 8270
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 2 of 5
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIOI MATRIX SAMPLED BY SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED
LEACH-S19H1001\\LEACH Aqueous Jason Preece 03/04/93 03/05/93
CONSTITUENT (CAS RN) *PQL RESULT NOTE f j g / L
Chrysene (218019) 10, ND Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (53703) 20. ND Di-n-butylphthalate (84742) 10. ND 1,2-D ichlorobenzene (95501) 20. ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (541731) 20. ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (106467) 20. ND 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine (91941) 30. ND Diethylphthalate (84662) 30. ND Dimethylphthalate (131113) 40. ND 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (121142) 10. ND 2,6-Dinitrotoluene (606202) 20. ND Di-n-octylphthalate (117840) 10. ND Fluoranthene (206440) 20. ND Fluorene (86737) 10. ND Hexachlorobenzene (118741) 10. ND Hexachlorobutadiene (87683) 40, ND Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (77474) 100. ND Hexachloroethane (67721) 30. ND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (193395) 20. ND Isophorone (78591) 10. ND
Camarillo Lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 S #1598; UTELAP #E-142; AZELAP #AZ0162; A2LA #0136-01; L.A. •RESULTS listed as "ND" were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitation Limit)
04/15/93 MSD8/OC09A MH/edt/clr/lhv/mem/mjd CJ05761075B
COAST - TO -COAST ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Air, Water Sc Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysis Sc Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology Sc Bioassay Laboratories
San Luis Obispo, CA • Benida, CA • Camarillo, CA • San Jose, CA • Goleta, CA Anaheim, CA • Tempe, AZ • Valparaiso, IN • Westbrook, ME • Indianapolis, IN
SoCal Division (Camarillo Laboratory) 4765 Calle Quetzal, Camarillo, Califomia 93012
(805) 389-1353 FAX (805)389-1438
CLIENT: Wayne Pickus Canp Dresser & McKee Inc. 100 Pringle Avenue Suite 300
Lab Number Project
Analyzed
CJ-0622-25 2416-112-IM-GRND/GW
03/15/93 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Analyzed by: RD
Method : EPA 8270
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 3 of 5
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLED BY SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED
LEACH-S19H1001\\LEACH Aqueous Jason Preece 03/04/93 03/05/93
CONSTITUENT (CAS RN) *PQL RESULT NOTE /ig/L /ig/L
Naphthalene (91203) 20. ND Nitrobenzene (98953) 20. ND N-Nitrosodimethylamine (62759) 10. ND N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (86306) 30. ND N-Nitroso di-n-propylamine (621647) 20. ND Phenanthrene (85018) 10. ND Pyrene (129000) 20. ND Trichlorobenzene (108703) 20. ND Aldrin (309002) 5. ND alpha BHC (319846) 10. ND beta BHC (319857) 5. ND delta-BHC (319868) 20. ND ganma BHC (Lindane) (58899) 30. ND p,p'-DDD (72548) 30. ND p,p'-DDE (72559) 10. ND p,p'-DDT (50293) 10. ND Dieldrin (60571) 10. ND Endosulfan I (959988) 20. ND Endosulfan I I (33213659) 20. ND Endosulfan Sulfate (1031078) 30. ND
Camarillo Lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 & #1598; UTELAP #E-142; AZELAP #AZ0162; A2LA #0136-01 •RESULTS listed as 'ND' vere not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitation Lim
04/15/93 MSD8/OC09A MH/edt/clr/lhv/mem/mjd CJ05761075B
C O A S T • T O • COAST ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Air, Water 4c Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysis Sc Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology Sc Bioassay Laboratories
San Luis Obispo, CA • Benida, CA • Camarillo, CA • San Jose, CA • Goleta, CA Anaheim, CA • Tempe, AZ • Valparaiso, IN • Westbrook, ME • Indianapolis, IN
SoCal Division (Camarillo Laboratory) 4765 Calle Quetzal, Camarillo, California 93012
(805) 389-1353 FAX (805)389-1438
CLIENT: Wayne Pickus Canp Dresser & McKee Inc. 100 Pringle Avenue Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Lab Number : CJ-0622-25 Project : 2416-112-IM-GRND/GW
Analyzed : 03/15/93 Analyzed by: RD Method : EPA 8270
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 4 of 5
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLED BY SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED
LEACH-S19H1001\\LEACH Aqueous Jason Preece 03/04/93 03/05/93
CONSTITUENT (CAS RN) •PQL RESULT NOTE /ig/L /ig/L
Endrin (72208) 30. ND Endrin Aldehyde (7421934) 20. ND Heptachlor (76448) 5. ND Heptachlor Epoxide (1024573) 5. ND Chlordane (57749) 50. ND Methoxychlor (72435) 10. ND Toxaphene (8001352) 300. ND PCB 1016 (12674112) 300. ND PCB 1221 (11104282) 300. ND PCB 1232 (11141165) 300. ND PCB 1242 (53469219) 300. ND PCB 1248 (12672825) 300. ND PCB 1254 (11097691) 300, ND PCB 1260 (11096825) 300, ND 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol (59507) 10. ND 2-Chlorophenol (95578) 10. ND 2,4-Dichlorqphenol (120832) 20. ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol (105679) 30. 150. 2,4-Dinitrophenol (51285) 100. ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (534521) 100. ND
Camarillo Lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 & #1598; UTELAP #E-142; AZELAP #AZ0162; A2LA #0136-01; L.A.C •RESULTS listed as 'ND' were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitation Limit)
04/15/93 MSD8/OC09A MH/edt/clr/lhv/man/mjd CJ05761075B
Air, Water Sc Hazardous Waste Sampling, Analysis Sc Consultation Certified Hazardous Waste, Chemistry, Bacteriology Sc Bioassay Laboratories
San Luis Obispo, CA • Benida, CA • Camarillo, CA • San Jose, CA • Goleta, CA Anaheim, CA • Tempe, AZ • Valparaiso, IN • Westbrook, ME • Indianapolis, IN
ScjCal Division (Camarillo Laboratory) 4765 Calle Quetzal, Camarillo, Califomia 93012
(805) 389-1353 FAX (805)389-1438
CLIENT: Wayne Pickus Canp Dresser & McKee Inc. 100 Pringle Avenue Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Lab Number : CJ-0622-25 Project : 2416-112-IM-GRND/GW
Analyzed : 03/15/93 Analyzed by: RD Method : EPA 8270
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MATRIX SAMPLED BY
Page 5 of 5
SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED
LEACH-S19H1001\\LEACH Aqueous Jason Preece 03/04/93 03/05/93
CONSTITUENT (CAS RN) •PQL RESULT NOTE /jg/L f j g / L
2-Nitrophenol (88755) 10. ND 4-Nitrophenol (100027) 100. ND Pentachlorophenol (87865) 30. ND Phenol (108952) 10. 110. 2,4,e-Trichlorophenol (88062) 10. ND Phenol-d5 (Surrc^gate Standard % Recovery) 65. 2-Fluorophenol (Surrogate Standard % Recovery) 66. 2,4,6,-TribromDphenol (Surrogate Standard % Recovery) 72. Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surrogate Standard % Recovery) 72. 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surrogate Standard % Recovery) 87. 4-Terphenyl-dl4 (Suixogate Standard % Recovery) 72. Cresols 10, 720. Methylnaphthalenes (91576) 20, ND
Camarillo Lab Certifications: CAELAP #1783 & #1598; UTELAP #E-142; AZELAP #AZ0162; A2LA #0136-01; •RESULTS listed as 'ND' were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitation Limit
04/15/93 MSD8/OC09A MH/edt/clr/lhv/mem/mjd CJ05761075B
Respectfully submitted, COAST-TO-CQAST ANAI^TICAL SERVICES,
Mary Havlicf President
INC.
i i I '
;,' .,.,,
·'<, •' ·'
... \
'"/.::· '·'
'·t
···. ,.-,_·· ..
' "·
.;·
,.·
) .
I~ ~· 'i~
. . · :'J,'.' .. , ~~ ·:. :/ ',;I' ...
~ ',,;
. t'. ."".·
~ ( '· ....
,,;. . ' .. " . • •• ~J • . . . ~ .-..... . ~'
-;-,,
·-·, , .. •'
' ~. ' .
,, ' .~,-,.
... , , ... '•', .. /,: ::~
·. ~- ·' '<·' : ,. ~.
r· -.:· .. ·
'J· - ...
~ ;t' . ~ ' ,. . .: · .. ,,
' •.,· .( ) .,
•:,.:-.
~·.
.:· · .. : ·) ; ~ . .. ~ "1 :· . ;, ;,~' '· '·'
' ~· ~-.. - I
.;
,.., ~ ·. '
·.· ~ . '• : . . ~ '
'!I; . ',• '\-. '-;,
't'
. ~- --... ''. - •' •, /' ((.
i·
. ·' .,· '·.·
:. ·~.
J_'"''
'·'}' \
' / ~ ~ ~ ~-;· ..
• I ·~
:,;/1. ~ <·t, c;
\;•1
.· ~. ' •• 'J •. _;·
'.f· ·---<.. ,, . . • ... ~ .
--~·. ~: ,·_
;-_,
'.''.·. \:!
.''
· .. ·.· ... _ .....
_._, .·.-..... ··- .· .,.
FRESNO LANDFILL RI SLUG TEST ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Wal l 10
S c r s s n
Infarval
(Dspth • tt)
H y d r o g s o l o g i c
Uni t
Gsophys i ca l
Log
L i tho logy
Dr i l l ing
L o g
L i tho logy
Hvo rs lav
Wa l l
R a d i u s
S c r a a n
Lang th
B o r a h o l a
Dlamatar
To K
fVday
Commanta
C D M - 2 A 6 0 - 8 0 A 60-64 Clay, 64-68 Sand
68-70 Clay, 70-74 Silt
74-60 Sand
60-66 Sand
68-74 Silty C lay
74-76 Sandy Silt
le-BA.S Sand
4 ' 20' 0,802'
7385E-04
1.377E-03
3.496E-04
22
1 2 - 4 7
Slug Ins. - Poor Data
S lug Recovery - Median
Slug Recovery • Range
C D M - 5 A 6 0 - 6 0 A 60-62 Clay, 62-64 Silt
64-66 Sand , 64-72 Sit & Clay
72-74 Silt, 74-60 Sand
60-68 Sandy Clay
68-60 Sand
4" 20' 0.802' 3.056E-05
1.111E-05
469
244
206-301
S lug In - Poor Data
S lug Out • G o o d Data
S lug Out - Range
C D M - 7 A 6 0 - 8 0 A 60-63 Silt, 63-77 S ,Snd /Snd
77-78 Silt, 78-80 Clay
60- 61 Sndy Clay
61- 60 Sand
4- 20' 0,802'
1.076E-04 25,2
S lug In - Poor Data
Logger Started Late
S lug Out - Quest ionable
Logger Started Late
C 0 M - 2 B t 2 6 - 136 Upper B l
(115-144)
126-128 Silt, 128-130 Sand
130-132 Silt, 132-134 Clay
134-136 Silt
126-128 Silt
128-131 S . S a n d / S a n d
130-136 Clayey Silt
A' 10' 0.802' 2,833E-04
4.S14E-05
2,607E-04
2.31SE-04
112
112-594
17
17- 10
S lug In ' Poor Data
S lug In - Range
S lug Out • G o o d Data
S lug Out - Range
C D M - S B 122-132 Upper B2
(124-148)
122-124 Silt, 124-127 Sand?
127-132 Silt
H 2 0 122-126,130-134
116-124 Sand
124-128 S , Silt ,
128-132 S a n d
4- 10' 0.802'
g.056E-0S 49
S lug In - Poor Data
S lug Out • Great Data
C D M - 2 C 220 - 235 C
(200-238)
220-222 Clay, 222-230 Sand
230-232 Silt, 232-234 Sand
234-235 Silt
220- 221 Sand
221- 222 S . Silt
222- 229 S . S a n d / S a n d
229-235 Sandy C lay
5- 15' 0,802' 2,706E-0S
3.917E-05
194
168 - 252
134
100-154
S lug In • Poor Data
S lug In - Range
S lug Out • G o o d Data
S lug Out • Range
C D M - 5 C 2 1 0 - 2 2 5 c (220-232)
210-212 Clay, 212-220 Silt
220-223 S a n d , 223-225 Silt
Best H 2 0 ® 220-223
210-219 S , Sit/Silt
219-222 C . Silt
222-224 S a n d
224-227 S . C lay
5- 15' 0.802' 1.031 E-04
7271E-OS
SI
72
Slug In • Good Data
S lug Out - G o o d Data
C D M - 7 C 201 - 2 1 6 Lower B/Upper
C @ 2 1 6 - 2 3 7
201-207 Silt, 207-210 Clay
210-216 Silt
194-208 S . Silt
208-240 S . S n d / S a n d
5- 15' 0.802'
2,0e33E-OS 252
S lug In - Poor Data
S lug Out - Okay Data
0.01 - -
0.001
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 2A INSERTION
• - • • - • JC I
X
• • • • • 0.1
(I 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
Time (Minutes)
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 2B INSERTION
1 -r
O X I
X
0.1
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
Time (Minutes)
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 20 INSERTION
0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.15
Time (Minutes)
0.17 0.19 0.21
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 5A INSERTION
1 T
o X I
X
0.1 ' • ' • I ' * • ' 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.08
Time (Minutes)
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 50 INSERTION
Time (Minutes)
I X
o X I
X
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 70 INSERTION
0.1 • I • • • • I • • • ' I •' 0.02 0.04 0.06
0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
Time (Minutes)
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL CDIVi2A REMOVAL
I X
o X I
0.1 0.5
\
• ^ B •
^
—.—.—>—^—h . . . 1 ' • Upper 1 • 1 • 1 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 —
• • ^^""^^ Lower
\ v Median
I 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — ' — ' — ' — 1
1.5 2
Time (Minutes)
2.5 3.5
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 2B REMOVAL
I X
o X I
0.1 I I I I * t I I I I I I t I I I I I ' I I T ' ' I ' * ' '
K2
I I I ~1 I I
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Time (Minutes)
1 -r
O X I
X
0.1
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 20 REMOVAL
• • • • I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I LT 1 1
K2 -1 , I I I I I I I I I I im I •
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18
Time (Minutes)
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 5A REMOVAL
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
Time (Minutes)
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 5B REMOVAL
JC I
X
0.1 I I u I I I I I I I t I I I ! ' J I I I L- t i l l
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
Time (Minutes)
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 50 REMOVAL
1 -r
O X I
X
0.1 I t - i I L.
0.05
J I T I L_ _I I I 1_
0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
Time (Minutes)
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 7A REMOVAL
1
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
Time (Minutes)
SLUG TEST ANALYSIS WELL 70 REMOVAL
1 T
I X
0.1 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
Time (Minutes)
AQUIFER PUMPIIMG TEST EVALUATIONS
FRESNO RI AQUIFER TEST ANALYSIS SUMMARY
WELL METIIOD T (FtVday) COMMENTS S
U-16 Pumping Jacob 12,430 AS=4.4 ft, t 10 min.
U-16 Pumping Jacob 68,400 AS=0.8 ft, t = 30-500 min.
U-16 Pumping Specific Capacity 25,800
U-16 Recovery t/t'-Jacob 13,680 AS=4,0 ft, t/t'= 60-400. 0,27
U-16 Recovery t/t'-Jacob 170,980 As=0,32 ft, t/t'= 1-8,
U-16 t=88,400
W-5 Pumping Theis 176,260 Type curve to fit later data. 0.75
W-5 Pumping Jacob 193,540 Meets u 0.01 criteria. 0,49
W-5 Pumping Jacob 92,740 As=0.59 ft, late-time. 11,6
W-5 Pumping Jacob 321,850 As=0.17 ft, t = 5-100 min. 2.8
W-5 Recovery t/t'-Jacob 132,160 As=0.414 ft, t/t'= 1.5-3.
W-5 Recovery t/t'-Jacob 303,970 As=0.18 ft, t/t'= 3-30.
W-5 f=148,700
DW-IB Pumping Theis 78,750 Curve fit to earlier data. 0,001
DW-IB Pumping Theis 167,620 Curve fit to later data. 0.00029
DW-IB Pumping Jacob 177,120 Meets u 0,01 criteria. 0.00025
DW-IB Pumping Jacob 95,990 As=0,57 ft, t ^ 100 min.
DW-IB Pumping Jacob 202,650 AS=0,27 ft, t > 100 min, much data scatter.
DW-IB Recovery t/t'-Jacob 94,340 AS =0,58 ft, t/t'= 10-30.
DW-IB Recovery t/t'-Jacob 237,890 As=0.23 ft, t/t'= 2,5-7.0.
DW-IB f=196,300
DW-IC Pumping Theis 59,400 Curve to fit early data. 0.0007
DW-IC Pumping Jacob 142,490 Meets u 0,01 criteria. 0.0001
DW-IC Pumping Jacob 68,390 AS=0.80 ft, t 100 min.
DW-IC Pumping Jacob 147,880 AS=0.37 ft, t > 100 min.
DW-IC Recovery t/t'-Jacob 64,370 As=0.85 ft, t/t'= 8-20.
DW-IC Recovery t/t'-Jacob 210,440 As=0.85 ft, t/t'= 2-6.
DW-IC f=166,900
CDM-4B Pumping Theis 62,582 Curve to Tit early data. 0.0015
CDM-4B Pumping Theis 167,180 Curve to Ht later data. 0.0008
CDM-4B Pumping Jacob 235,300 Meets u i 0.01 criteria. 0.0004
CDM-4B Pumping Jacob 198,960 AS =0.275 ft, t > 200 min, corrected.
CDM-4B Recovery t/t'-Jacob 437,720 AS=0,125 ft, t/t'= 2-5.
CDM-4B Recovery t/t'-Jacob 124,350 As=0.44 ft, t/t'= 6-10.
CDM-4B f=200,500
CDM-4C Pumping Theis 99,190 Curve to Ht early data. 0.001
CDM-4C Pumping Theis 203,330 Curve to fit later data. 0.0003
CDM-4C Pumping Jacob 241,060 Meets u i 0.01 criteria. 0.0002
CDM-4C Pumping Jacob 176,500 AS=0.31 ft, t > 200 min, corrected.
CDM-4C Recovery t/t'-Jacob 437,720 AS =0.125 ft, t/t*= 2-5.
CDM-4C Recovery t/t'-Jacob 124,350 As=0.44 ft, t/t'= 6-10.
CDM-4C f=207,000
CDM-1 A, 1B Pumping Test water levels
0.0000 500.0000 1000.0000 1500.0000 2000.0000 2500.0000
Time (min) 3000.0000 3500.0000 4000.0000
CDM-1 A — t — CDM-1 B
STATIC WATER LEVELS 0.35-
0.25
Q) D) C ca
XI
o
> 0) (D
t5
0.15
0.05
-0.05
0.0000 100.0000 200.0000 300.0000 400.0000 TIME (min)
500.0000 600.0000 700.0000
W-5 MW-2 DW-1B
STATIC WATER LEVELS
0.0000 100.0000 200.0000 300.0000 400.0000
TIME (min) 500.0000 600.0000 700.0000
CDM-4A - i i i - CDM-4B CDM-4C
WELL U-16 water level changes
A. ^
lib
L
L
k
\ . L
o
Q
Q
0.0000 200.0000 400.0000 600.0000 800.0000 1000.0000
CUMULATIVE TIME (min) 1200.0000 1400.0000 1600.0000
WELL U-16 water level changes PUMPING PLOT
o
Q
Q
0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000
TIME (min) 100.0000 1000.0000
WELL U-16 water level changes RECOVERY PLOT
5 o Q
< QC Q
1.0000 10.0000 100.0000 1000.0000
TIME (t/f) 10000.0000 100000.0000
Observation Well Water Level Changes Pumping Phase
0.1000 1.0000 10.0000
TIME (min) 100.0000 1000.0000
w-5 MW-2 DW-1B - Q - DW-IC
0.1000
Observation Well Water Level Changes Pumping Phase
1.0000 10.0000
TIME (min) 100.0000 1000.0000
EW-1 ^ CDM-4A CDM-4B - Q - CDM-4C
0.9-
0.8-
0.7-
4—.
0.6-CD
0.6-
Oi c
ha
0.5-
O "Q)
0.4-> 0.4-
0.3-
0.2-
0.1-
-0.1-1.0000
1
Observation Well Water Level Changes RECOVERY PLOT
10.0000 100.0000 1000.0000
TIME (t/f)
W-5 -X- MW-2 DW-1 B - s - DW-1 C
1.0000
Observation Well Water Level Changes RECOVERY PHASE
10.0000 100.0000 1000.0000
TIME (t/f)
EW-1 CDM-4A CDM-4B - s - CDM-4C
Well U-16 Pumping Test Data
^ T =9.016 f t V H i n
S = 47.43
1 I 1 i 1 lill i i i i 1 iill i i i i i l ! ; 1 I t t i i i i ; i t i i t i ±
1 I
I A I i I III i : I I I i ! j l i i i i i
AQTESOLV GERRGHTV & MILLER. INC
Modeling Group
Well U-16 Pumping Test Data I i 1 iIllij 1 I 11 iilij I i 111 ill
- T =35.89 f t^ /n in S = 8.5567E-e7
I-
D
hs.
I i t t i t 11 i i i i i i4
i
i I I l l l j j l I I : ; t :s ; l l l l i ! ! f \ n . Jt I I : : j
AQTESOLV GERRGHTV
& MILLER. INC
Modeling Group
A V V 1
fell U-16 Pumping Test Data .= I i i i i Miill
U I t
lu.
i O i5 10<U
Hi iy
f*. 4
~ * L
i T =8.693 ft^/nin
u
-P ^ «
•
6r
il i> i M i ifH
AQTESOLV GERflGHTV
& MILLER. INC.
Modeling Group
a . i •S:? r I±I
^ V V '* V
FRESNO PUMP TEST - WELL W5 DATA
o
U l l l l l l l l | I T = 122.4 r ± ^ y n i n
I- S = 0.7529
0.1
0.01 Mini
AQTESOLV GERflGHTV
& MILLER. INC
M o d e l i n g Giroup
0.0010.01 0.1 1 10. 100.1000. Time (min)
FRESNO PUMP TEST - WELL W5 DATA
.'H
P
1.
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
O.S
O.i
t= I I iiiiii
T = 134.4 r ± ^ y n i n S = 0.4933
AQTESOLV GERRGHXy MILLER. INC
0. 0.0010.01 0.1 1. 10. 100.1000.
Time (min)
M o d e 1 i n g G v o u p
llllffl]
FRESNO PUMPING TEST - DW-IB DATA CTTT
T I- S
0.1
0.01
III \r\\m = 5 4 . 6 9 r t - ^ / n i n = e . 0 0 1 0 7 7
mill!
AQTESOLV GERflGHTV
Sr MILLER. INC.
Modeling Gvoup
0.0010.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (min)
100.1000.
FRESNO PUMPING TEST - DW-IB DATA U I I Iiiiil
T S
f=i
0.1 -
0.01
= l i e = 0 . 0 0 0 2 8 8 6
Illll!
AQTESOLV ^GERflGHTV Sr M I L L E R . INC
Modeling Gvoup
0.0010.01 0.1 1.:. 10. Time (min)
1 0 0 . 1 0 0 0 .
FRESNO PUMPING TEST - DW-IB DATA
PI
O
o
1.
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.
[= I i iiiiiii I I iiiiiij I I lllllll I I lllllll I
T = S =
123. r t ^ y n i n O .0002509
AQTESOLV GERflGHTV
& MILLER. INC
Modeling Gvoup
0.0010.01 0.1 1. 10. 100.1000. Time (min)
FRESNO PUMPING TEST - DW-IC DATA
rt
Q
10
1.
0.1
0.01
F T T I I lllllll I I TT
T = 4 1 . 2 5 r t - ^ / n i n S = 0 . 0 0 0 7 0 5 6
I I IIIIII iilUi
lllllll I iiiimj
E AQTESOLV GERflGHTV
Sr M I L L E R . I N C .
Modeling Gvoup
0.0010.01 0.1 1. 10. 100.1000. Time (min)
FRESNO PUMPING TEST - DW-IC DATA 1= I llllllll I llllllll I llllllll I llllllll I llillllll I IIIIW o
1 .8
1 .6
1 .4
1
O 1.
1^ 0 .8 rt
0 .6 Q 0 .6
0 .4
0
0.
E T = 9 8 . 9 5 r ± ^ y n i n = - S = 0 . 0 0 0 1 0 7 4
I i
g AQTESOLV GERflGHTV
& MILLER. INC
Modeling Gvoup
0.0010.01 o.i 1.. 10. 100.1000. Time (min)
FRESNO PUMPING TEST - CDM-4B DATA 1.
rt U P
0.1
0.01
\—I—I I l i l l _ T = 4 3 . 4 6 r t ^ y n i n - S = 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 9
TTq
A Q T E S O L V GERflGHTV
& MILLER. INC
Modeling Gvoup
10. J. Uu 1000. Time (min)
FRESNO PUMPING TEST - CDM-4B DATA \ \ I I II I u
o
rt
P
O.i
0.01
T 1—TTT T = 116.1 rt^/Min S = 0.0008273 P =0.01
10. l O U . Time (min)
AQTESOLV GERflGHTV
& MILLER. INC.
Modeling Gvoup
1000.
FRESNO PUMPING TEST -1.
0.9
CDM-4B DATA 1 T T T T T H
T = 1 6 3 . 4 r t - ^ y n i n
100. Time (min)
i AQTESOLV GERflGHTV
& MILLER. INC
Modeling Gvoup
1000.
FRESNO PUMPING TEST - CDM-4B DATA
<t-i
O
rt
P
1. E
0.9
0.8 i
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.
T 8
1 \ 1 I I I I I I = 90.57 rt^yni n = 0.001081
10. 1 nn Time (min)
AQTESOLV GERflGHTV
Sr MILLER. INC
Modeling Gvoup
1000.
FRESNO PUMPING TEST - CDM-4C DATA
rt
P
0.1
0.01
L i I lllllll I I lllllll I I Illliij
_ T = 6 8 . 8 8 r t - ^ y n i n S = 0 . O O 1 0 4 7
- -1 .1 . l l i 1 = 11
I I Mill'
AQTESOLV GERflGHTV
Sr MILLER. INC
Modeling Gvoup
0.0010.01 0.1 10. 100.1000. F-n • _ / » \
1 i ilx C i 111 1 IX }
FRESNO PUMPING TEST -
rt U P
_ T = 1 4 1 . 2 r ± ' ^ y n i r t - S = O . O O 0 3 0 7 5
0.1
0.01
I I lllllll I I lllllll I Ml rm
CDM-4C DATA TTMF
o '•)Oil-.-.—=T
0.0010.01 0.1
T™
AQTESOLV GERflGHTV
& MILLER. INC
Modeling Gvoup
10. 100.1000. Time (min)
FRESNO PUMPING TEST - CDM-4C DATA I 11 IIIIII I iiii^ 1.
0 .9
0 .8
••• . 0 .7
0 .6
o 0 .5 d
>• 0 .4
rt
Dr
0 • o
0 .2
0 .1
0.
1= 11 IIII
E T = 167.4 r ± ' ^ / ' n i n =~ S = O.O0O1769
I I lllllll I lllllllj I I I 2
g Ill I I Illll
AQTESOLV 4B^GERflGHTV
'^^Sr MILLER. INC.
M o d e l i n g G v o u p
0.0010.01 0.1 T i i T
1. 10. 100.1000. i m i n)
3 •
a
n
Soil Gas Model
' C D M Camp Dresser & McKee^.
Appendix 0 Modeling Soil Gas as a Potential Groundwater
Contamination Source at the Fresno Sanitary Landfill
Objective Simulate .potential groundwater contamination from percolating precipitation which has come in contact with contaminated soil gas. Consider two scenarios, a worst case in which the highest soil gas VOC concentrations are used along with conservative asstmiptions; and a more representative case which uses average soil gas VOC concentrations.
Conceptual Approach An off site volume of soil containing VOC contaminated soil gas is considered. Variations in barometric pressure are known to result in "atmospheric pumping" of soil gas from the upper portion of the soil volume. The depth to which this pumping would result in a loss of VOC mass is a function of the soil permeability and the degree of barometric pressure change. Below this depth, diffusion of soil gas to the "pumping" zone above would result in a further loss of VOC mass from the soil volume.
At depths near the water table soil gas VOCs may remain relatively constant in the short term. The capillary fringe will act as a barrier to soil gas contamination of the underlying ground water, however, VOCs would still be expected to diffuse slowly across the fringe. The more significant route of transport of soil gas VOCs to ground water is through percolating precipitation and/or irrigation water. As water percolates through the soil column and comes in contact with soil gas VOCs, it is expected to become contaminated by those VOCs due to partitioning from the gas phase to the liquid phase. The extent of this contamination of percolating water is described by Henry's law which defines ideal partitioning between the liquid and gas phases at equilibrium. As the water continues to percolate, it may eventually enter the aquifer. This percolation process is expected to be more sigruficant than soil gas diffusion across the capillary fringe and is the focus of this modeling effort.
To estimate the potential for percolating precipitation to contaminate ground water the following approach was used.
• Use historical precipitation data to estimate the volume of percolating water used to flush the soil gas VOCs from the vadose zone.
• Assume that a gas collection system is operating at the landfill perimeter which captures soil gas from perimeter soils up to 50 feet from the landfill edge.
' • Assume that no "atmospheric pimtping" of soil gas occurs.
• Select appropriate soil gas VOC concentrations for each of the two scenarios to be modeled based on available soil gas survey data.
• Calculate the mass of each VOC present in soil gas in the soil volume being modeled.
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee C-1 882\FRESNO RI\APPEND<M-13-93 let
Appendix 0 Modeling Soil Gas as a Potential Groundwater
• Assume that equilibrium partitioning occurs between the soil gas VOCs and the percolating water according to Henry's Law. (i.e., partition reactions are fast compared to the percolation rate).
• Assume that the entire mass of each VOC is flushed by the percolating water volume.
• Estimate the volume of groimd water in the mixing zone beneath the soil colimm.
• Estimate the flux of groundwater into the mixing zone over the assumed time of flushing.
• Estimate the resulting VOC concentrations in groundwater assuming complete mixing.
Assumptions The following numerical assumptions were used in the calculations of these simulations.
• Annual precipitation is 10.5 inches, 20 percent of which flushes the vadose zone and enters the groundwater.
• The average porosity in the "A" aquifer is 0.25.
• The mixing depth in the "A" aquifer is 3 meters.
• The hydraulic conductivity is 100 feet/day.
• The hydraulic gradient is 0.001 ft/ft.
Calculations Worst Case Scenario Assume no irrigation at the south end of landfill and an average precipitation rate of 10.5 inches, 20 percent of which flushes vadose zone to water table.
Flush Volume
(Average RainfalQ(Percent Percolating) = Infiltration depth over the soil column
(10.5)(0.2) = 2.625 inches = 6.7 cm
(490,000 ft2)(—Lni^l = 45,539 = percolation area i 10,76 ft j
(Area)(Depth) = flush volume
(45,539 m2)(0.067 m) = 3,051 m = 3,051,115 L
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee C-2 882\FRESNO RI\APPEND<^8-13.93 tet
Appendix C Modeling Soil Gas as a Potential Groundwater
GW Mixing Volume
(mixing area)(mixing depth)(poros!ty) = mixing volume
(45,539 m2)(3 m)(0.25) = 34,154 m = 34,154,250 L
Groundwater Flux Volume
Hydraulic Conductivity = K = 100 ft/ day
• Based on CDM slug tests analyses from wells CDM-2A, -5A, -7A, and on conservative value derived from well pumping test.
Hydraulic gradient = I = 0.001 ft/ ft
• Based on average of July 1992 and February 1993 water level measurements.
Aquifer Porosity = n = 0,25 (Not needed for this evaluation)
• Based on literature values of silt materials; representative of the aquifer.
Use Darcy's Law to calculate groundwater flux:
Q=KIA Q=(100 ft/day)(0.001 ft/ft)(6,890) Q=689 ft /day; in 1 year Q = 251,412 ft - 1,880,562 gal. = 7,120,520 L
Hydraulic Conductivity = K = 100 FT/ DAY
• Based on CDM slug tests analyses from wells CDM-2A, -5A, -7A, and on coi\servative value derived from well pumping test.
Hydraulic Gradient = I = 0.001 ft/ ft
• Based on average of July 1992 and February 1993 water level measurements.
Use Darcy's Law to calculate groundwater flux:
Q=iaA Q=(100 ft/day)(0.001 ft/ft)(ll,480 ft ) Q=l,148 ft /day; in 1 year Q - 419,000 ft' - 3,134,000 gal = 11,862,190L
CDM Camp Dresser &. McKee C-3 882\FRESNO RI\APPEND-C\8-13-93 let
Appendix C Modeling Soil Gas as a Potential Groundwater
Aquifer VOC Cone
Aquifer VOC Cone mass of VOC In soil volume (mg) flush vol (L) + GW mixing volume (L) + GW flux (L)
Vinyl Chloride = 34,574 mg VC = 0.8 ppb viiiyi v.iiiu u« 3 Q5i ^^5 L ^ 34,154,250 L + 7,120,520 L
TCE Cone = 94,088 TCE ^ ^ 3,051,115 L + 34.154,250 L + 7,120,520 L
PCE Cone = 2,016,061 mg PCE ^ ^ 3,051,115 L • 34,154,250 L + 7,120,520 L
Average Site Wide Scenario Under this scenario, average groundwater concentrations were calculated by normalizing the worst case scenario results according to soil gas VOC concentration differences between the SE comer soil plot and average perimeter soils. The method of estimating average PCE, TCE, and vinyl chloride soil gas concentrations for the entire site was described in the text. These concentrations were 3,799 mg/m' for PCE, 509 mg/m' for vinyl chloride.
Groundwater VOC Concentrations
Average GW Cone. = (wor^t ease GW cone.) [ Average soil gas cone, at 15 ft^ \ ^worst case soil gas cone, at 15 ft )
PCE: (45 ppb) f ^ ^ ^ l = 14 PPb i,11,759 mg/m J
TCE: (2 ppb)f 509 ^ 9 l f ] = 1.2 ppb ^847 mg/m';
Vinyl chloride: (0.8 ppb)f ^^"*^] = 0.I ppb i500 mg/m J
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee C-4 882\FRESNO RI\APPEND-C\8-13-93 let
•"•'.•K'-'>- • :',..:~rs^-i.
3
Groundwater Model
CDM Camp Dresser &. McKee
505
504
503
502
501
500
499
498
497
496 -
495 -
494
493
492 h
491
— LEVEL 1 ELEVATION
'T 1 T — r "1 1 1 r "1 T 1 1 r
1743 J
1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 IHOUSANDS,
OATE/nuE: PLOrtED: DWPlorS CREAIEO: OTNaOWS 0AIE/IlUE:08/liy9J 09:09 SkVt FILE: IPUUPZ6,SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Local Model
Elevation of Level 1
505
504
503
502
501
500
499
498
497
496
495
494
493
492
491
LEVEL 2 ELEVATION
. .J L 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765
rHOUSANDS,OFFEET OAIE/THIE: PLOTTED: DWPIOTS CREATED: DYNFUW5 DATE/TIME: 0a/ l l /9J 09:09 SAVE FILE: IPUUP26,SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Local Model
Elevation of Level 2
505
504
503
502
501
500
499
498
497
496
495
494
493
492
491
- ^ T --r - i
LEVEL 5 ELEVATION
- T I " 1 " •'••T " T " T - T " T r - T r • T~ 1— r
_ 1 L _ _ J L. I I I I l l l l
1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 fHQUSANDS,OFFEET
DATE/puE: FIOITEO: (jmPlOIS CREATED: OlrNFlOWS DATE/mC: Oa/nySJ 09:09 SAVEFIE: IF\JVIP2S.S*V
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Local Model
Elevation of Level 3
505
504
503
502
501 h
500
499 h
498
497
496
495
494
493
492
491
... -J- ^ "1 1 I I 1 T" 1 - T 7 — T "~r — r "
LEVEL 4 ELEVATION
J L I I I I L .1 L
1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 rHOUSANDS,OFFEET
OATE/nuE: PLOTTED: (m)PlOT8 CREATED: OTNFLOWS DATE/TIME: 08/11/9J 09K)9 • ripuur
I8/11/9J 09:
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Local Model
Elevotion of Level 4
505
504
503
502
501
500
499
498
497
496
495 -
494 -
493 -
492 -
491
- - | T 1 " " "1 " 1 — T • T T T T T 1 T T" r r
lEVEL 5 ELEVATION
1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1/49 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 IHQDSANDS,
OAIE/nUE; PLOrlEO: mtlPlOTS CREATED: (WFL0*5 DATE/HUE: 08/11/93 09:09 SAVEFU: IPUUPK.SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Local Model
Elevation of Level 5
505
504
503
502
501
500 -
499 -
498
497
496
495
494
493
492
491
r - T r I I I T"1 ' V T T
LEVEL 6 ELEVATION
1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 IHOUSAMDSi
OATE/nilE; PLOnED: 0YNP10T8 CREATED: DtNFLOW OATDTIUE: 08/11/9J 09:09 SAVE f U : iPuViras,s»v
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Local Model
Elevation of Level 6
590
580
570
560
550
540
530
520
510
500
490
480
470
460
450
440
430
•- LEVEL 1 ELEVATION
1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET
n»TE/T1HEi PlOniD. DTNP10T8 CREATED: DTNaOW OAIE/THIE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FILE: FSL62,SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Regional Model
Elevation of Level 1
590
580
570
560
550
540
530
520
510
500
490
480
470
460
450
440
430
LEVEL 2 ELEVATION
/
1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1800 . L 1820 1840 1860 1880
IHOUSANDS OF FEET
DATE/HUE: PiOmO: OWPIOH CHEAItD: DnmOW OATt'IlME: 08/07/93 14:25
• SAVC HLE: FSL62.SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Regional Model
Elevation of Level 2
590
580
570
560
550
540
530
520
510
500
490
480
470
460
450
440
430
LEVEL 3 ELEVATION
1 T"
1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET
DATE/IIUE; PLOITEO: 0WPL0T8 CREATED: OVWLCWS DATE/TIME: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVf FU: FS162.SAV
FRESNO SANITARY UNDFILL Regional Model
Elevation of Level 3
590
580
570
560
550
540
530
520
510
500
490
480
470
460
450
440
430
- |—' r
LEVEL 4 ELEVATION
_ l _ ..L _L 1620 1640 1660 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1800 1820
/ -
1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET
PlOrtED. OWPIOIB CREATED: OTNaO*5 DAiynuE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVffl£:PSL«2.»V
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Regional Model
Elevation of Level 4
590
580
570
560
550
540
530
520
510
500
490
480
470
460
450
440
430
I r
— LEVEL 5 ELEVATION
1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET
OATE/puE: PLOTTED DWP10T8 CREATED: DYNFIOW DATE/TIUE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FIE: f SL62.SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Regional Model
Elevation of Level 5
_1_ . L . -L 1620 1640 1660 m m ' i72o" \ m I m m isoo
_L_ 1820
L _
1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET
DATE/HUE: PLOTTED: DYNPIOTB CREATED: DTNaOW OAIE/nuE: 08/07/93 14:25
^ M n i : FS162.4AV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Regional Model
Elevation of Level 6
505
504
503
502
501
500
499
498
497
496
495
494
493
492
491
I I I L
MATERIALS LAYER 1 mm<Z D UNIT - 15 FPD
1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 THOUSANDS, OF FEET
OATE/nuE; PLOITEO: OtNPlOTS CREATED: OrNFlOTS OAIE/nME: 08/11/93 09:09 SAVE FILE: IPUUP26.SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Local Model
Materials for Layer 1
505
504
503
502
501
500
499
498
497
496
495
494
493
492
491
MATERIALS LAYER 2 C UNIT - 20 FPD
I I I I
1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 THOUSANDS. QF FEET
DATE/TIME: PLOITEO; DWPlOra CREATED: 0YNF10W5 DATE/HUE: 08/11/93 09:09 SAVE FU: 1PUUP26,SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Local Model
Materials for Layer 2
505
504
503
502
501
500
499
498 -
497 -
496 -
495
494
493
492
491
"T •T
MATERIALS LAYER 3 B2 UNIT - 5 FPD B2 UNIT - 20 FPD
1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 THOUSANDS, OF FEET
DATE/TIUE: PLOTTED: OtNPLOIS CREATED: DWaOWS DAIE/IWE: 08/11/93 09:09 SAVEFU: IIMUP26.SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Local Model
Materials for Layer 3
505
504
503
502
501
500
499
498
497
496
495
494
493
492
491
n—1 —T — r r 1 1 r n r "I r 1 T" " r I r
MATERIALS LAYER 4 W / m , Bl UNIT - 10 FPD
rmm ei UNIT - i FPD Bl UNIT - 5 FPD
1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 THOUSANDS,
DATE/puE: PLOTTED OriNPLOTS CREATED: OWFlCrW OAIE/nuE; 08/11/93 09:09 Sf tSJU: IPVjl«6,SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Local Model
Materials for Layer 4
505
504
503
502
501
500 h
499
498
497 h
495
495
494
493
492
491
r r
MATERIALS LAYER 5 A UNIT - 100 FPD
1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 THOUSANDS, OF FEET
DATE/TIME: PLOTTED: DrtNPLOTB CREATED: BVNFEOWS DAIE/TIUE: 08/11/93 09:09 SAVE FU: IPUUP26,SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Local Model
Materials for Layer 5
590
580
570
560
550
540
530
520
510
500
490
480
470
460
450
440
430
"MATERIALS LAYER 1 D UNIT - 15 FPD
1620" I 1640 1660 1680 1700
I
1720 1740 L 1760 1780 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880
THOUSANDS OF FEET
OATE/puE: PLOTTED: BniPLOTB CREATED: OWIOW DAIE/TIUE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FU: FS16ZSAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Regional Model
Materials for Layer 1
590
580
570
560
550
540
530
520
510
500
490
480
470
460
450
440
430
1620
C UNIT - 0.75 FPD C UNIT - 15 FPD C UNIT -20 FPD C UNIT - 30 FPD
/
1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET
OATE/nuE: PLOITID: DmPlOTB CREATED: DIWIOW DAIE/UME: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FHE: FSl«2.«V
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Regional Model
Materials for Layer 2
590
580
570
560
550
540
530
520
510
500
490
480
470
460
450
440
4,50
MATERIALS LAYER 3 l i l l l i l l B2 UNIT - 5 FPD
B2 UNIT - 20 FPD B2 UNIT - 10 FPD
1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1820 1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET
QATE/IIME: PlfllTED owpiora CREATED: OmfflCWS DATE/HUE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FU: FSL62.SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Regional Model
Materials for Layer 3
590
580
570
560
550
540
530
520
510
500
490
480
470
460
450
440
430
MATERIALS LAYER 4 Bl UNIT - ,5 FPD Bl UNIT - 5 FPD
1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET
DAIE/UME: PljOnED. OINPIOTB CREATED: OmflOWS DATE/HUE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FU: FS162.SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Regional Model
Materials for Layer 4
590
580
570
560
550
540
530
520
510
500
490
480
470
460
450
440
430
1520 1540 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1760 1780 1800 1820 1840 1850 1880 THOUSANDS OF FEET
DAlE/puE: PLOITEO: (WPtOTB CREATED: DYWICWS DAIE/nwE: 08/07/93 14:25 SAVE FU: FSL62.SAV
FRESNO SANITARY LANDFILL Regional Model
Materials for Layer 5
CDM environmental engineers, scientists,
planners, & management consultants^
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE
offices worldwide . " . ' Printed on Recyded Paper
top related