replacement passenger terminal concept validation by

HOLLYWOOD BURBANK AIRPORT

REPLACEMENT PASSENGER TERMINAL CONCEPT VALIDATION

COPYRIGHT © BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

11-5-18 Commission Mtg. Item No. 8.a. RPT Concept Validation

The proposed Replacement Passenger Terminal

is feasible in the preferred location

HOLLYWOOD BURBANK AIRPORT

REPLACEMENT PASSENGER TERMINAL CONCEPT VALIDATION

O U R T E A M

BuroHappold Engineering – Project Management; Structural and MEP Engineering

Airbiz – Airport Planning

Gruen Associates – ADA and Restrooms

Psomas – Civil Engineering and Roadways

Innovat + 20/20 – Parking

BNP – Baggage Handling

ECG – Demolition

Capital Projects Group – Cost Model

Replacement Passenger Terminal

• 355,000 SF (max)

• 14 gates

New Public Parking Structure

New Employee Parking

Support Buildings

New Access Roads

Demolition of Existing Terminal

Taxiway Extensions

P R O J E C T U N D E R S TA N D I N G – T H E W H AT

Runway separation does not meet current standards

Seismically deficient

Inconsistent capability between gates

Complicated maneuvers required on airfield

Aging terminal building

Limited concessions and amenities

Underserves users with disabilities

P R O J E C T D R I V E R S – T H E W H Y

Safety

• Proper runway separation

• Meets current seismic design standards

Customer Convenience

• ADA

• Amenities

• Maintain easy access and convenience

Community

• Resilience (Natural disasters)

• Energy efficient terminal

• Reduced emissions

B E N E F I T S

Operations

• Reduction in taxi times and runway crossings

• Simplified aircraft maneuvers

• Consistency and capability at all gates

• Increased concessions revenue

• Expanded holdroom size

• Faster check-in

• Centralized TSA checkpoint

• Centralized bag check/screening

B E N E F I T S

P H A S I N G

Phase 1: Northeast Quadrant• Terminal

• Parking

• Access Roads

• Support Facilities

Phase 2: Southeast Quadrant• Demolition

• Taxiway Extensions

A S S U M E D S C H E D U L E I N CO N C E P T VA L I DAT I O N

PHASE 1 PHASE 2

Design Begins

Construction Begins

Replacement Passenger

Terminal Opens

Demolition of

Existing Terminal

Project

Completion

Q3-2020

Q1-2021

Q1-2024

Q1-2024

Q1-2026

Northeast Quadrant Southeast Quadrant

PHASE 0

Concept Validation

EIS

Public Charrettes

Validation

Begins

Q1-2018

Q3-2018

Validation

Complete

Concept Validation

The proposed Replacement Passenger Terminal works in

the preferred location

ADG III Aircraft Layout (Same capability at all gates)

14 Gates

355,000 SF Terminal

CO N C LU S I O N

P R O P O S E D P R O G R A M VS 2 0 1 6 CO N C E P T

Increase in area

• Baggage

• Security

• Holdrooms

• Concessions

Decrease in area

• Check In

• Restrooms

• Offices

• MEP

TOTAL AREA = 355,000 SF

P R O P O S E D L AYO U T : G R O U N D F LO O R

Total Floor Area = 247,601 SF

A E R I A L

1. Terminal Depth

2. Site Grade

3. Airport Access

4. Employee Parking

5. Public Parking Structure

6. Air Traffic Control Tower

7. Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Facility

O P P O RT U N I T I E S TO B E A D D R E S S E D I N D E S I G N P H A S E

COPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

ACC E S S

COPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Cost Model

COPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

S U M M A RY

Project ElementConstruction

CostsSoft Costs

Project

Contingency

Total Project

Budget

Airside $85,500,000 $21,400,000 $10,700,000 $117,600,000

Landside $266,300,000 $70,600,000 $32,300,000 $369,200,000

Terminal $476,900,000 $189,000,000 $66,000,000 $731,900,000

Demolition $15,900,000 $4,000,000 $1,500,000 $21,400,000

Total All Elements $844,600,000 $285,000,000 $110,500,000 $1,240,100,000

COPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Design Contingency Included

Construction Contingency Included

Program Contingency Included

Pricing and Cost Escalation Contingency

• 2018 - 6%

• 2019 - 5%

• 2020 - 4%

• 2021 - 4%

• 2022 - 4%

B A S I S O F CO S T M O D E L

COPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Soft Costs

• Design Costs 7.0% - 15.0%

• Project / Program Management / Oversight 3.0% - 6.0%

• Consultant Construction Services 3.0% - 6.0%

• Quality Assurance / Testing / Inspection 2.0% - 3.0%

• Permitting, Utility Connections, Etc. 0.5% - 1.5%

• Furnishings, Fixtures and Equipment (FF&E) - Common Use 1.0% - 2.0%

• Low Voltage / Security Active Equipment - Common Use 2.0% - 5.0%

• Art in Public Places (Defined below) 0.5% - 1.0%

B A S I S O F CO S T M O D E L

COPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Cost model presents total program cost

Includes both Authority responsibilities and costs paid for by others

Certain program elements may be deferred

S U M M A RY

Replacement Terminal

Access Roadways

Aircraft Ramp

Public Parking

Employee Parking

Support Facilities

Taxiway Extensions

SEQ Modifications

TSA Equipment & Install Concession Fit Out

PROGRAM COST BY ELEMENT

Direct Construction

Cost

42%

Design &

Construction

Contingency

7%

Escalation

9%

Indirect Construction

Cost

14%

Design Cost

7%

Soft Costs

14%

Owner Contingency

7%

PROGRAM COSTS BY TYPE

COPYRIGHT © BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING . ALL RIGHTS RESERVED