rapid integrated assessment of food safety and nutrition: context
Post on 15-Jan-2015
410 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Rapid integrated assessment of
food safety and nutrition: Context
Kristina Roesel Presented at the PigRisk project outcome mapping and in-depth survey workshop Hanoi, Vietnam, 18 June 2013
Outline
1. Brief recap of ILRI’s value chain work
2. Brief recap on the rapid integrated assessment project
3. Results: rapid assessment of pigs in Uganda
4. In-depth work on questionnaires
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
Past research has focused specific aspects
of given value chains, commodities and country.
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
...in Country A
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
...in Country D
...in Country C
...in Country B
Criticism: Traditional approach was piecemeal with little impact!
CGIAR mandate since ~40 years: agricultural research for poverty alleviation
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
R4D integrated to transform selected value chains
In targeted commodities and countries.
Value chain development team + research partners
• Launch of CGIAR Research Programs http://www.cgiarfund.org/research_portfolio
• Multi-centre, multi-partner, multi-disciplinary
Since 2012: Focus on integrated value chains for bigger impact . . .
More milk, meat, and fish
by and for the poor
(CGIAR Research Program on Livestock and Fish)
Goal: increasing production/productivity for food security
in 9 selected value chains
PIGS
AQUACULTURE
SHEEP & GOATS
DAIRY
• 3 components around human nutrition (IFPRI-led)
• 1 component on prevention and control of agricultural associated diseases (ILRI-led) • Food safety • Neglected zoonoses • Emerging infectious diseases • Ecohealth/One Health
• Integrated programs &
harmonized policies
https://aghealth.wordpress.com/
CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health
Since 2012: Value chain assessment
8 Taylor and Rushton (2011)
Rapid integrated assessment of food safety and nutrition:
The generic toolkit
Rapid integrated assessment of food safety and nutrition (RIA)
• June - November 2012 development of a generic set of tools for the integrated assessment of food safety and nutrition in livestock value chains
• Collaboration with Royal Veterinary College (RVC)
• Funded by ACIAR
• Now applied in 6 livestock value chains (4 under Safe Food, Fair Food project)
Objectives:
• To assist rapid integrated assessment of food safety, zoonoses and nutrition in informal livestock value chains as one facet of a comprehensive value chain assessment
• feeds, breeds
• market access
• animal health, food safety/zoonoses/nutrition
• enabling environment
• To report to livestock value chain managers
11
Key outputs:
• Systematic literature review on zoonotic hazards • Situational analysis of enabling environment • Qualitative (rapid) assessment
• knowledge, attitudes, practices and incentives (KAPI)
• Quantitative assessment • prevalence survey of selected hazards
• questionnaire survey with value chain actors
• Identification of critical control points and suggestions for risk mitigation
12
4 phases of RIA:
1. Collection of secondary data
2. Qualitative assessment: participatory appraisals, focus group discussions, key informant interviews
3. Quantitative assessment: questionnaire survey and biological sampling
4. Feedback to communities and stakeholders
Key research questions I/III:
• Food safety • What are the main hazards likely to be present in
the value chain? • What risks do these hazards pose to value chain
actors?
• Food and nutrition security • What is the role of the animal-source food in
question in diets of poor farmers and consumers? • What is the relationship between livestock keeping
and livestock eating?
•
14
Key research questions II/III:
• Combined food safety and nutritional issues • How does nutritional quality and food safety
change along the value chain? • What are the trade-offs? • Are there trade-offs/synergies between feeds
and foods? • How do the different animal-source food value
chains compare in meeting nutrition and food safety needs?
• How is value chain development likely to affect food safety and nutrition?
15
Key research questions III/III:
• Social and gender determinants of health and nutrition • Who gets the nutritional benefits and bears the
risk of animal source foods? • How do gender roles and poverty invluence health
and nutrition risks? • How do cultural practices affect health and
nutrition risks?
• Trends and possible interventions • How (and at which point of the value chain)
could investments enhance consumption of nutrients and decrease health risk?
16
In Uganda and Vietnam, we have completed phase 1 and 2
The quantitative assessment, questionnaire survey (and biological sampling)
• Producer
• Trader (live pigs/pig products)
• Bulking point (slaughter)
• Retailer
• Consumer
Producer questionnaire, 12 modules:
A. House hold information
B. Maternal dietary diversity
C. Child dietary diversity
D. Animal source food and nutrition
E. Food security
http://www.fantaproject.org/downloads/pdfs/HFIAS_v3_Aug07.pdf
F. Production
G. Time trade-offs
Producer questionnaire, 12 modules:
H. Inputs
I. Food hygiene, consumption amounts and frequencies
J. KAPI: Knowledge, Attitude, Practice and Incentives for
change
K. Health/cost of illness
L. Observation checklist
Transporter questionnaire, 4 modules:
A. Value chain actor information
B. Origin and destination of pigs/pork
C. Transport (of live animals and pig products)
D. Observation checklist
Bulking point (slaughter) questionnaire, 6 modules:
A. Value chain actor information
B. Inputs and outputs
C. Live animals (ante mortem)
D. Slaughter process
E. Knowledge, attitudes and practices
F. Observation checklist
Retailer questionnaire, 7 modules:
A. Value chain actor information
B. Supply network
C. Transport
D. Customers, processing, preparation, handling and sales
(fresh pork/ processed pork)
E. Human health
F. Knowledge, attitude, practice
G. Observation checklist
Consumer questionnaire, 7 modules:
A. Household information
B. Maternal dietary diversity
C. (Index) child dietary diversity
D. Availability, accessibility and substitution
E. Food security
F. Knowledge, attitude, practice
G. Health information
The presentation has a Creative Commons licence. You are free to re-use or distribute this work, provided credit is given to ILRI.
Contact: Kristina Roesel
Project coordinator “Safe Food, Fair Food” ILRI Kampala
https://safefoodfairfood.wordpress.com/
www.ilri.org
Acknowledgements
• Addis Ababa University (AAU), Ethiopia • Agricultural Research Institute of Mozambique (IIAM) • Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central
Africa (ASARECA) • Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire (CSRS) • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH), Switzerland • Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Germany (BfR) • Freie Universität Berlin (FUB), Germany • German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development
(BMZ) • German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ) • International Foundation for Science (IFS), Sweden • Italian Embassy • Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology • National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa • Programme d’Appui Stratégique à la Recherche Scientifique en Côte
d’Ivoire (PASRES)/ Fonds Ivoiro-Suisse de Développement Economique et Social (FISDES)
• Promotion of Private Sector Development (PSDA/GIZ) • Rakuno Gakuen University (RGU), Japan • Royal Veterinary College (RVC), UK • Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA), Tanzania • University of Ghana (UoG), Ghana • University of Hohenheim (UoH), Germany • University of Nairobi (UoN), Kenya • University of Pretoria (UoP), South Africa
top related