proposed 2020 outsourced pavement preservation program (op3) documents/2020... · proposed 2020...
Post on 25-Sep-2020
10 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Public Works & Utilities
Maintenance Division
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 2
Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3
Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program Project Selection Process ..................................................... 3
Traditional Approach ................................................................................................................................ 3
1. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ................................................................................................... 3
2. Completion of Locations Previously Identified ............................................................................. 4
3. Stakeholder Requests ................................................................................................................... 4
4. Maintenance History and Other Programs ................................................................................... 4
Enhanced Approach .................................................................................................................................. 4
1. Continued Emphasis on Preventive and Preservative Maintenance ............................................ 4
2. Pilot Projects ................................................................................................................................. 6
3. Investment Optimization .............................................................................................................. 7
2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program Summary ..................................................................... 7
Definitions ................................................................................................................................................. 7
1. Brick Crosswalk Replacement ....................................................................................................... 7
2. Crack Seal ...................................................................................................................................... 8
3. Concrete and Asphalt Repair ........................................................................................................ 8
4. Microsurfacing Seal ....................................................................................................................... 9
5. Preservative Seal ........................................................................................................................... 9
6. Scrub Seal .................................................................................................................................... 10
7. Ultrathin Bonded Asphalt Surface (UBAS) .................................................................................. 10
8. Localized Repair of Drainage and other Anomalies .................................................................... 11
Proposed Expenditures ........................................................................................................................... 11
Network Funding/Expenditures Summary.......................................................................................... 11
District Expenditures Summary .......................................................................................................... 12
Network Impact Summary .................................................................................................................. 12
Proposed Locations ................................................................................................................................. 13
Outsourced Pavement Preservation Overview Map ............................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 3
Introduction
The City of Wichita’s paved street network is comprised of more than 5,100 lane-miles of residential,
collector and arterial streets and expressways, representing a total paved area of more than 325 million
square feet. In order to cost effectively maintain this vast network of assets, the City supplements the
critical preventive, corrective and emergency maintenance efforts of its internal staff by leveraging the
resources and expertise of private contractors. Each year outsourced pavement maintenance efforts
are proposed and submitted for approval in the Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (formerly
the Contract Maintenance Program, or CMP). In order to effectively manage both internal and external
pavement maintenance resources, the Public Works & Utilities (PW&U) Department has always striven
to effect “the right treatment, on the right road, at the right time”. But, just as socioeconomic and
technological influences continue to evolve, so too does the department’s approach. At present, the
department is continuing its implementation of a project selection, evaluation, and reporting process
that is:
1. More objective, relying greater on economic measures like return on investment (ROI) and
remaining service life (RSL), and less on subjective measures like “good”, “satisfactory”, or “poor”
2. More supportive of experimentation and less adherent to past practice
3. More likely to incorporate new technologies
4. Better able to quantify the cost of deferred maintenance
5. Better able to maximize the City’s returns on future investments
6. Better able to assist in the identification of optimum funding levels
Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program Project Selection Process
Traditional Approach Locations to be addressed in the Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3) were traditionally determined using the following criteria.
1. Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
Every street segment in the City is reviewed and assigned a PCI number. The PCI number can
range from 0 to 100, and is determined by evaluating each segment for various pavement
distresses.
Traditionally, a PCI value of 70 has been considered satisfactory. Streets with PCIs below 70,
and especially below 50, were formerly considered first for inclusion in the OP3. PCIs were also
used to guide preventive maintenance, but only as funding allowed. (Preventive maintenance
delays streets from dropping into a lower condition range, which averts significantly more costly
repair.)
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 4
2. Completion of Locations Previously Identified
If repairs to previously programmed locations are not able to be completed, they are typically
included in the following year’s OP3.
3. Stakeholder Requests
Stakeholder requests are continually evaluated and prioritized against competing demands and
existing commitments. Qualifying locations are addressed either in-house, or via the OP3, as
resources allow.
4. Maintenance History and Other Programs
Streets that have required extensive mitigation by City staff, or for which routine maintenance
operations are no longer effective, also receive special consideration. Streets that are scheduled
for repair or replacement via other programs, such as the Capital Improvement Program (CIP),
are not included in the OP3.
Historically, OP3 expenditures were distributed equally among the City’s six council districts. While not
overtly a criterion, the practice was prioritized above other considerations, and thus had a profound
effect on project selection.
Enhanced Approach As part of ongoing efforts to maximize the City’s return on continued investments, several enhancements are proposed anew, or for continued exploration in 2020.
1. Continued Emphasis on Preventive and Preservative Maintenance
While preventive maintenance has historically been programmed as funding allows, it is
apparent that to ensure maximum return on investment, preventive maintenance must be
made a priority. Much like maintaining a functional roof over one’s home, the cost to maintain
a good road, in good condition, is far less than the cost to rehabilitate a failed one.
For example, a preservative seal can extend the service life of a good pavement by
approximately 5 years, at a cost around $1/sy, whereas milling and overlaying a bad pavement
may extend the service life just 8-12 years, at a cost of $10-$15/sy. When applied to a
hypothetical, quarter mile section of 4-lane arterial roadway (1 lane mile) the total cost to
preservative seal the section at $1/sy would be $7,040. The total cost to mill and overlay the
same section of roadway (7,040 sy) at a later date, assuming a midrange unit cost of $12/sy,
would be $84,480. Assuming service lives of 5 and 10 years, respectively, one finds that it costs
just $1,408 to add one full lane-mile-year of service life by preservative sealing, while the cost to
add the same one lane-mile-year of service life via mill and overlay is six times higher, at $8,448.
When one considers, again, that the City’s paved street network consists of roughly 5,000 lane-
miles of pavement, the financial prudence of preventive maintenance is clear. We know that
each lane-mile in the network has but a limited number of years remaining until the end of its
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 5
useful service life. Thus, in the absence of any maintenance improvements over a one year
period, we can surmise that the remaining service of each lane-mile will be reduced by one year.
Applied across the entire network, this represents a total service life reduction of 5,000 lane-
mile-years, each year. Pavement preservation treatments, as well as rehabilitative repairs and
reconstruction, however, add service life to the network. In order to offset the annual loss, the
City must add at least 5,000 lane-mile-years back to the system through its maintenance efforts
each year. Any less, results in an overall decline of the network’s condition. Any more, and the
overall condition improves.
While the City employs numerous strategies in its approach to pavement management, for the
purpose of example, we’ll examine a simplified approach using four common treatments,
including the two previously described, in the table below.
Treatment Type Approx. Cost/SY
Approx. Service
Life Extension
(Years)
Lane-mile-years
Needed to Maintain
Status Quo
Lane Miles to
be Treated
Cost to Maintain Status Quo
(Using prescribed treatment alone)
Rejuvenating Seal
Preventive $1 5 5000 1000 $7,040,000
Micro Surfacing
Preservative $3 6 5000 833 $17,592,960
Mill & Overlay Rehabilitation $12 10 5000 500 $42,240,000
Asphalt Reconstruction
Reconstruction $35 25 5000 200 $49,280,000
While none of the above hypothetical approaches is optimized for the City’s existing network,
the exercise serves to illustrate three points.
1. Preventive and preservative maintenance are better financial values than extensive
rehabilitation and replacement.
2. To successfully operate under the best of these scenarios – the one that serves to
maximize ROI – one would need to begin with a near perfect system and maintain 20% of
that system each year. In reality, less than 20% of our existing system falls within the
appropriate condition range for that treatment. Consequently, we must endeavor to
employ some optimum combination of treatments across the full spectrum of pavement
condition.
3. The example serves to demonstrate the scale of maintenance required and alludes to the
cumulative impact of deferred maintenance.
In light of the benefits, preventive and preservative maintenance have increased significantly
since 2011. The result has been a dramatic increase in the total number of lane miles
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 6
maintained each year. This is somewhat less pronounced in 2020, due to a higher concentration
of qualifying arterial pavements and the absence of standalone thermal crack repairs.
Nevertheless, as demonstrated below, approximately 478 lane miles will be touched be touched
in 2020, which is more than six times the number touched in 2011.
2. Pilot Projects PW&U is committed to the evaluation and incorporation of new pavement maintenance
strategies and techniques. A number of treatments have been successfully piloted in recent
years. In order to further evaluate the department’s developing preservation and mitigation
strategies (mitigating streets in poor condition, rather than undertaking significantly more costly
rehabilitation and reconstruction), several treatments are proposed for additional testing in the
coming year, as follows:
1. Preservative seal over micro surfacing seal (preservation)
2. Micro surfacing seal over scrub/crack seal (preservation)
3. Ultrathin bonded asphalt surface treatment (preservation/mitigation)
4. Failed brick crosswalk replacement with stamped colored concrete (mitigation)
5. Localized repair of drainage and other anomalies
Additionally, given its low initial cost and high overall ROI, a significant portion of the 2020
program is proposed to be dedicated to crack sealing. Historically, crack sealing has been
performed almost exclusively in-house. Consequently, continued large-scale outsourcing of the
work represents an ongoing pilot in and of itself, and lessons learned during 2019 will be
implemented in the coming year.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
72 106240
446 463
660813
410 466 478
Lane Miles Maintained per Year
Year
Miles
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 7
3. Investment Optimization Ongoing economic pressures have exposed the limitations of the City’s traditional use of PCI.
The PCI effectively illustrates network trends, but in and of itself does not allow for an objective
means of characterizing streets as “failed”, “deficient”, or “in need of repair”. More
importantly, it does not afford an objective means of quantifying the cost of deferred
maintenance. In order to accurately and objectively do so, an approach other than PCI is
needed.
PW&U believes the City will be best served by evaluating economic measures, rather than PCI
alone. Toward that end, the department has developed a computerized investment
optimization model. The model allows staff to analyze and compare various alternative
maintenance approaches in terms of ROI, RSL and asset value. Using these measures, priorities,
strategies and budgets may be optimized in terms of their long-term fiscal performance. Staff’s
evaluation of alternative approaches is ongoing and driven by the department’s commitment to
identify:
1. The short and long term results of the department’s existing strategy and budget
2. The strategy and budget required to maintain current condition and asset values
3. The strategy and budget that results in the optimum ROI
2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program Summary
Definitions
1. Brick Crosswalk Replacement Many of the City’s older brick crosswalks suffer from significant, recurring deterioration. In order to stem the tide, PW&U proposes building on its 2019 pilot to replace a select few with stamped colored concrete. Concrete is less susceptible to displacement than brick, and boasts an expected useful service life up to four times as long. Before After (partial completion)
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 8
2. Crack Seal “Crack Seal” is an application of hot liquid rubberized asphalt material placed into or above moderately sized pavement cracks. The treatment is used to prevent moisture infiltration in order to mitigate the occurrence of further distresses and reinforce the adjacent pavement.
Before After
3. Concrete and Asphalt Repair “Concrete repair” and “asphalt repair” includes the limited full-depth removal and replacement of concrete or asphalt pavement, in order to address myriad pavement distresses, including spalling, pop-outs, and base failures. Asphalt repairs are typically required and undertaken well in advance of asphalt treatments, like micro surfacing.
Before After
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 9
4. Microsurfacing Seal A “microsurfacing seal” is a mixture of relatively large aggregate, polymer modified emulsion, mineral filler and additives are combined and applied to an existing pavement using a specialized mixing and paving machine. The treatment is used to reduce water penetration, correct minor surface irregularities, improve aesthetics and extend the useful life of underlying pavement.
Before After
5. Preservative Seal A “preservative seal” consists of the application of an emulsion specially formulated to penetrate, restore and preserve existing asphalt binders. By keeping the pavement flexible, it serves to seal against water intrusion, inhibit oxidation and improve aggregate retention.
Before After
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 10
6. Scrub Seal
A “scrub seal” is constructed by spraying emulsified asphalt onto an existing pavement, dragging a broom across the surface to scrub the emulsified asphalt into the surface cracks, spreading aggregate over the emulsified asphalt, and rolling the surface with a roller. The treatment is used to quickly and affordably seal streets with extensive surface cracking. Before After (outside lane, only)
7. Ultrathin Bonded Asphalt Surface (UBAS) An “ultrathin bonded asphalt surface”, or UBAS, consists of a thin, coarse aggregate hot mix asphalt over a special asphalt membrane. Both the membrane and the wearing surface are applied in one pass with a spray paver. The membrane mitigates water intrusion and provides a superior bond to the existing pavement. The bonded surface corrects minor surface irregularities, improves aesthetics and extends the useful life of underlying pavement.
Before After
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 11
8. Localized Repair of Drainage and other Anomalies “Localized repair of drainage and other anomalies” encompasses a multitude of procedures that may be necessary to resolve persistent, but relatively isolated pavement issues. Though isolated, these issues tend to both negatively and disproportionately affect the condition of pavements that are otherwise in generally good condition. They also consistently and disproportionately consume in-house resources during and following catalyst events, like thunderstorms.
Proposed Expenditures Proposed 2020 outsourced pavement preservation expenditures total $10.8 million. Funding of $10,800,000 is included in the 2019-2028 Adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and will be financed with GO at-large bonds ($10,500,000) and funds from the state’s CCLIP program ($300,000).
Network Funding/Expenditures Summary
Funding Expenditures Percentage
CIP ($10.8 million)
Ultrathin Bonded Asphalt Surface $2,940,000 27%
Microsurfacing Seal $1,692,000 16%
Concrete Repair $1,507,000 14% Crack Seal $1,332,000 12%
Preservative Seal $757,000 7%
Localized Repairs $260,000 2%
Crosswalk Replacement $59,000 1%
CCLIP Project ($300,000 state funds) $525,000 5%
Contingency $540,000 5%
Engineering Salaries, Overhead and Bonding $1,188,000 11%
Total Funding $10,800,000 100.0%
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 12
District Expenditures Summary
Network Impact Summary
Project District
1 2 3 4 5 6
Ultrathin Surface
$682,000 $450,000 $604,000 $458,000 $503,000 $243,000
Microsurfacing Seal
$0 $592,000 $102,000 $382,000 $0 $616,000
Concrete Street Repair
$378,000 $0 $405,000 $378,000 $0 $346,000
Crack Seal $67,000 $330,000 $41,000 $48,000 $703,000 $143,000
Preservative Seal
$282,000 147,000 $62,000 $109,000 $71,000 $86,000
Localized Repairs
$114,000 $18,000 $4,000 $86,000 $7,000 $31,000
Crosswalk Replacement
$0 $0 $0 $59,000 $0 $0
2020 CCLIP Project
$93,000 $94,000 $76,000 $93,000 $79,000 $90,000
Engineering Salary/OH
$211,000 $213,000 $169,000 $210,000 $181,000 $204,000
Contingency $96,000 $96,000 $78,000 $95,000 $82,000 $93,000
Total Expenditures
$1,923,000 $1,940,000 $1,541,000 $1,918,000 $1,626,000 $1,852,000
% of Total Expenditures 17.8% 18.0% 14.3% 17.8% 15.0% 17.1%
% of Total Paved Network
in District 17.7% 18.0% 14.3% 17.7% 15.1% 17.2%
Project Arterial Lane Miles
Residential Lane Miles
Total Lane Miles
Crack Seal 221.83 48.17 270.00
Preservative Seal 54.84 39.32 94.16
Ultrathin Surface 57.82 0 57.82
Micro Surfacing 0 44.86 44.86
CCLIP Project 6.28 0 6.28
Concrete Repair 0 5.14 5.14
Totals 340.77 137.49 478.26
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 13
Proposed Locations
District I
STREET FROM TO PROJECT
ALOMA HILLSIDE GEORGE WASHINGTON Concrete Repair
S ELLIS AVE FUNSTON HARRY Concrete Repair
***Please refer to map (numerous locations)*** Crack Seal
BATTIN 1ST DOUGLAS Localized Repair
BATTIN CENTRAL 3RD Localized Repair
CHRISTINE 10TH 9TH Localized Repair
LIGHTNER 10TH 9TH Localized Repair
PATRICIA BEACHY 9TH Localized Repair
PATTON 2ND BLUERIDGE Localized Repair
ROOSEVELT 2ND 1ST Localized Repair
WATERMAN EDGEMOOR PARKWOOD Localized Repair
45TH ST EOP W OF K254 K254 Preservative Seal
9TH ST HILLSIDE AVE EOP W of MINNESOTA Preservative Seal
SAKER SAKER THUNDER Preservative Seal
THUNDER SAKER EOP E of 48TH Preservative Seal
21ST ST ROOSEVELT AVE HILLSIDE Preservative Seal
21ST ST BROADMOOR ST WOODLAWN Preservative Seal
22ND ST HILLSIDE AVE CHAUTAUQUA Preservative Seal
22ND ST LAMSON ST EDGEMOOR Preservative Seal
22ND ST WOODLAWN BLVD LAMSON Preservative Seal
23RD ST HILLSIDE AVE CHAUTAUQUA Preservative Seal
24TH ST BLECKLEY ST OLIVER Preservative Seal
25TH ST GLENDALE ST EOP E OF GLENDALE Preservative Seal
26TH ST VOLUTSIA AVE MADISON Preservative Seal
ARLENE DERRICK LORRAINE Preservative Seal
ARLENE EOP N. OF BATTIN OLIVER Preservative Seal
ASH 26TH 25TH Preservative Seal
BATTIN EOP N OF BATTIN LOOMAN Preservative Seal
BLECKLEY EOP N OF BLECKLEY LOOMAN Preservative Seal
CALLEN CALLEN EDGEMOOR Preservative Seal
KANE KANE EDGEMOOR Preservative Seal
CARRIAGE PKY EDGEMOOR CENTRAL Preservative Seal
CHARLOTTE 23RD LAMSON Preservative Seal
CHARLOTTE MAINSGATE CROYDEN Preservative Seal
CROYDEN EOP E OF FARMSTEAD CHARLOTTE Preservative Seal
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 14
District I (continued)
STREET FROM TO PROJECT
CHAUTAUQUA 23RD 21ST Preservative Seal
CHAUTAUQUA 26TH 25TH Preservative Seal
DERRICK 24TH ARLENE Preservative Seal
EDGEMOOR DR MAINSGATE 21ST Preservative Seal
ERIE AVE 23RD 21ST Preservative Seal
ERIE AVE 26TH 25TH Preservative Seal
ETHEL GLENDALE OLIVER Preservative Seal
FARMSTEAD 23RD 21ST Preservative Seal
GLENDALE 25TH ETHEL Preservative Seal
GREEN 27TH 25TH Preservative Seal
GROVE EOP E OF 28TH 27TH Preservative Seal
LAMSON EDGEMOOR 22ND Preservative Seal
LOOMAN OLD MANOR OLIVER Preservative Seal
LORRAINE 24TH 22ND Preservative Seal
LORRAINE EOP 25TH Preservative Seal
MADISON 27th 25TH Preservative Seal
MINNESOTA MINNESOTA 25TH Preservative Seal
OLIVER 1ST DOUGLAS Preservative Seal
OLIVER ENGLISH OAKLAND Preservative Seal
OLIVER 2ND 1ST Preservative Seal
OLIVER LEWIS ENGLISH Preservative Seal
OLIVER CENTRAL 2ND Preservative Seal
PARKWOOD MAINSGATE ARLENE Preservative Seal
PIATT 26TH 25TH Preservative Seal
PINECREST LOOMAN 21ST Preservative Seal
POPLAR 27th 25TH Preservative Seal
PRINCE AUDREY 21ST Preservative Seal
RIDGEWOOD MAINSGATE CROYDEN Preservative Seal
SPRUCE 27TH 25TH Preservative Seal
VOLUTSIA 27TH 25TH Preservative Seal
WOODLAWN 29TH 21ST Preservative Seal
E DOUGLAS Ave S PERSHING AVE N HILLSIDE AVE Ultrathin Surfacing
HILLSIDE 53RD K254 Ultrathin Surfacing
HYDRAULIC K254 DOUGLAS Ultrathin Surfacing
ROCK 37TH K96 Ultrathin Surfacing
End District I
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 15
District II
STREET FROM TO PROJECT
***Please refer to map (numerous locations)*** Crack Seal
JACKSON HEIGHTS CENTRAL 1ST Localized Repair
35TH COMOTARA ROCK Microsurfacing
BARRON BARRON CIR CYPRESS Microsurfacing
BEDELL WEBB BRECKENRIDGE Microsurfacing
BEECH BEDELL LINCOLN Microsurfacing
BENT TREE BENT TREE CIR GREENLEAF Microsurfacing
BOSTON WEBB BRECKENRIDGE Microsurfacing
BOXTHORN GREENLEAF WINDWOOD Microsurfacing
BRECKENRIDGE HARRY BEDELL Microsurfacing
CEDARIDGE CIR SWEET BAY EOP Microsurfacing
CHAMPIONS ROCK SWEET BAY Microsurfacing
COOPER LINCOLN LAUREL Microsurfacing
CYPRESS DOS RIOS LINCOLN Microsurfacing
DOS RIOS CYPRESS BRECKENRIDGE Microsurfacing
GREENLEAF GREENLEAF CT 21ST Microsurfacing
JASMINE ROCK RD OAKMOUNT Microsurfacing
LAUREL BEDELL LINCOLN Microsurfacing
LINCOLN EOP LINCOLN Microsurfacing
LINCOLN EOP LINCOLN Microsurfacing
MULBERRY ROCK EOP Microsurfacing
OAKMOUNT JASMINE SWEET BAY Microsurfacing
PEPPERTREE GREENLEAF EOP Microsurfacing
SWEET BAY SWEET BAY CIR 37TH Microsurfacing
WINDWOOD GREENLEAF BOXTHORN Microsurfacing
127TH K96 21ST Preservative Seal
17TH WINSTEAD RUTLAND Preservative Seal
18TH WINSTEAD DOREEN Preservative Seal
21ST ROCK WOODLAWN Preservative Seal
BONITA MICHELLE TARA FALLS Preservative Seal
BROADMOOR 21ST ROCKHILL Preservative Seal
CHADOWES TALLYRAND RUTLAND Preservative Seal
CHELSEA TALLYRAND RUTLAND Preservative Seal
DEER HAVEN EOP FAWN GROVE Preservative Seal
DOREEN 18TH 17TH Preservative Seal
EAGLE BRACKEN EAGLE CT Preservative Seal
GREENWICH OSIE S OF MOUNT VERNON Preservative Seal
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 16
District II (Continued)
STREET FROM TO PROJECT
HARRY HARRY CT BRECKENRIDGE Preservative Seal
HORSEBACK HORSEBACK HORSEBACK Preservative Seal
MICHELLE S OF BONITA CHERRY CREEK Preservative Seal
ROCKHILL WINSTEAD ROCK RD Preservative Seal
RUTLAND CHADOWES 17TH Preservative Seal
TALLYRAND BROADMOOR 17TH Preservative Seal
WINSTEAD ROCKHILL 17TH Preservative Seal
29TH WEBB ROCK Ultrathin Surfacing
ROCK K96 CHAMPIONS Ultrathin Surfacing
WEBB 37TH K96 Ultrathin Surfacing
End District II
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 17
District III
STREET FROM TO PROJECT
K15 RAMP AT I-135 BIRDGE OVER I-35 CCLIP Project
***Please refer to map (numerous locations)*** Crack Seal
BALDWIN WACO WICHITA Concrete Repair
CHRISTINE BOSTON ZIMMERLY Concrete Repair
FUNSTON MISSION WOODLAWN Concrete Repair
GREEN OSIE HARRY Concrete Repair
MISSION S OF FUNSTON EOP OSIE Concrete Repair
WASSALL ROSE MARIE HYDRAULIC Localized Repair
31ST HYDRAULIC WASHINGTON Microsurfacing
PATTIE 31ST DONNELL Microsurfacing
WASHINGTON 31ST EOP N OF LUTHER Microsurfacing
BROADWAY EOP N OF ORME MOUNT VERNON Preservative Seal
JADE EOP JADE Preservative Seal
SENECA 30TH 27TH Preservative Seal
EDGEMOOR HARRY ORME Ultrathin Surfacing
HYDRAULIC 47TH MACARTHUR Ultrathin Surfacing
OLIVER GEORGE WASHINGTON COLFAX Ultrathin Surfacing
End District III
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 18
District IV
STREET FROM TO PROJECT
BONN JEWELL MAY Concrete Repair
BURTON GORDON EDWARDS Concrete Repair
GORDON BURTON DOUGLAS Concrete Repair
SAINT CLAIR DOOLEY IRVING Concrete Repair
***Please refer to map (numerous locations)*** Crack Seal
31ST CUSTER MERIDIAN Localized Repair
BURTON WALNUT HANDLEY Localized Repair
CUSTER 31ST SUNNYBROOK Localized Repair
MCCORMICK GLENN BONN Localized Repair
29TH GLENN MILLWOOD Microsurfacing
30TH GLENN SENECA Microsurfacing
32ND SHERIDAN GORDON Microsurfacing
33RD SHERIDAN MOUNT CARMEL Microsurfacing
CHASE EOP 31ST Microsurfacing
CUSTER 31ST EOP Microsurfacing
DIANE GLENN MILLWOOD Microsurfacing
ELIZABETH 31ST MARLBORO Microsurfacing
EXPOSITION 31ST 30TH Microsurfacing
FERN 30TH 29TH Microsurfacing
GORDON 31ST EOP Microsurfacing
MARLBORO VINE MILLWOOD Microsurfacing
MARTINSON 31ST 30TH Microsurfacing
MILLWOOD 27TH 31ST Microsurfacing
MOUNT CARMEL 33RD 31ST Microsurfacing
REGAL VINE MILLWOOD Microsurfacing
SAINT PAUL EOP 31ST Microsurfacing
SHERIDAN 33RD 31ST Microsurfacing
VINE MARLBORO REGAL Microsurfacing
47TH BROADWAY SENECA Preservative Seal
JEWELL JEWELL CT JEWELL CT Preservative Seal
MAPLE ANNA SHERIDAN Preservative Seal
SENECA HASKELL 27TH Preservative Seal
HOOVER MACARTHUR 47TH Ultrathin Surfacing
MAPLE 119TH 135TH Ultrathin Surfacing
TYLER K42 YOSEMITE Ultrathin Surfacing
End District IV
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 19
District V STREET FROM TO PROJECT
***Please refer to map (numerous locations)*** Crack Seal
WESTLINK 13TH 12TH Localized Repair
119TH CT 119TH EOP Preservative Seal
13TH MAIZE 119TH Preservative Seal
BREEZY POINTE MAPLE BREEZY POINTE CT Preservative Seal
FORESTVIEW MAPLE ANGELA Preservative Seal
WHEATLAND CENTRAL S TO EOP Preservative Seal
CENTRAL RIDGE RD GILDA Ultrathin Surfacing
CENTRAL TYLER WOODCHUCK Ultrathin Surfacing
RIDGE 21ST 37TH Ultrathin Surfacing
End District V
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 20
District VI
STREET FROM TO PROJECT
17TH GARLAND HOOD Concrete Repair
HOOD 19TH 18TH Concrete Repair
NEWELL MOUNT CARMEL CUSTER Concrete Repair
SAINT PAUL 3RD 2ND Concrete Repair
WACO 26TH 25TH Concrete Repair
***Please refer to map
Crack Seal
21ST LAKEWAY ZOO PARK Localized Repair
ARKANSAS 26TH 24TH Localized Repair
ARKANSAS 30TH MEADOW CREEK CIR Localized Repair
HOOVER 23RD ZOO Localized Repair
WESTDALE CORNELISON WESTDALE Localized Repair
12TH SAINT FRANCIS BROADWAY Microsurfacing
14TH MERIDIAN CLARENCE Microsurfacing
14TH SAINT PAUL EDWARDS Microsurfacing
35TH LITCHFIELD ARKANSAS Microsurfacing
36TH EDWARDS MERIDIAN Microsurfacing
37TH BROADWAY 37TH Microsurfacing
37TH ARMSTRONG JEANETTE Microsurfacing
60TH LEGION LEGION Microsurfacing
8TH WEST KESSLER Microsurfacing
ARMSTRONG 37TH 35TH Microsurfacing
ATHENIAN 15TH 13TH Microsurfacing
BAEHR 9TH CENTRAL Microsurfacing
CLARENCE 15TH 13TH Microsurfacing
ELM NEVADA WEST Microsurfacing
HIGH 15TH 13TH Microsurfacing
ILLINOIS 8TH ELM Microsurfacing
JOANN 15TH NANTUCKET Microsurfacing
KESSLER ZOO MURDOCK Microsurfacing
LEGION 53RD N OF BELLA Microsurfacing
MCCOMAS 8TH ELM Microsurfacing
MERIDIAN EOP N OF 37TH EOP S OF 34TH Microsurfacing
MURDOCK WEST KESSLER Microsurfacing
PORTER EOP 53RD Microsurfacing
SAINT CLAIR 15TH 13TH Microsurfacing
SEDGWICK 15TH 14TH Microsurfacing
SHERIDAN 15TH 13TH Microsurfacing
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 21
District VI (continued)
STREET FROM TO PROJECT
WOMER 15TH ATHENIAN Microsurfacing
26TH HOOVER 26TH CT Preservative Seal
2ND W OF MOORE WASHINGTON Preservative Seal
BRISCO EOP PARADISE Preservative Seal
BROADWAY 23RD 25TH Preservative Seal
CURTIS CURTIS EOP Preservative Seal
DORIS BRISCO EOP Preservative Seal
DORIS CT DORIS EOP Preservative Seal
KOLLMEYER KOLLMEYER EOP Preservative Seal
MCLEAN MERIDIAN SENECA Preservative Seal
BROADWAY 29TH 25TH Ultrathin Surfacing
HYDRAULIC 39TH 37TH Ultrathin Surfacing
End District VI
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
Page 22
Pavement Joint & Crack SealPreservative SealMicrosurfacingConcrete Repair Ultrathin SurfacingLocalized RepairCCLIP ProjectBrick Crosswalk Replacement
Map Legend
Proposed 2020 Outsourced Pavement Preservation Program (OP3)
District 1 District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
RO
CKW
EST
TYLE
R
31ST S
RID
GE
HARRY
MA
IZE
47TH S
55TH S
21ST N
61ST N
45TH N
37TH N
13TH N
29TH N
53RD N
OLI
VER
SEN
ECA
12
7TH
E
PAWNEE
14
3R
D E
15
9TH
E
HIL
LSID
E
CENTRAL
HO
OV
ER
KELLOGG
15
1ST
W
11
9TH
W
13
5TH
W
16
7TH
W
18
3R
D W
MER
IDIA
N
HYD
RA
ULI
C
BR
OA
DW
AY
MAC ARTHUR
WEB
B
GR
EEN
WIC
H
WO
OD
LAW
N
top related