port state control (psc) (a quality flag’s perspective) · 2020-05-05 · port state / flag state...
Post on 13-Aug-2020
5 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
PORT STATE CONTROL (PSC) (A QUALITY FLAG’S
PERSPECTIVE)
Presented by:
Brian Poskaitis
Senior Vice President, Fleet Operations
PSC
*Cooperating Member Authority
§ Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MoU): Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, UK
§ US Coast Guard (USCG): United States
§ Tokyo MoU: Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Fiji, Hong
Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Marshall Islands, New Zealand, Panama*, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Singapore, Thailand, Vanuatu, Vietnam
2
3
SAFETY AND SECURITY ROLES
PORT STATE / FLAG STATE INTERVENTIONS
§ The vessel has reached an unacceptable condition or standard and has serious life-saving, firefighting, watertight integrity, or Safety Management System (SMS) deficiencies.
§ Both the port State and flag State interventions are viewed as a means to get the vessel back on track and in compliance.
4
FLEET TYPES
As of 31 March 2017
5
VESSELS REGISTERED BY NATIONALITY
6
As of 31 March 2017
FLEET GROWTH
As of 31 March 2017
7
REGIONAL SUPPORT
8
9
2016 PSC DETENTIONS BY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MoU)
10
2016 DETENTIONS BY VESSEL TYPE
72
24
12
3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
11
2016 DETENTIONS BY VESSEL AGE
23
34
25
21
6
12
5
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 15 16 to 20 21 to 25 26 to 30
Total = 110 Total USCG = 9
12
2016 COMPLIANCE INITIATIVES (US)
DETENTION RATE AVERAGE OVER LAST THREE (3) YEARS - MUST BE LESS THAN 1%
0.67
%
0.71
%
0.74
%
0.77
%
0.81
%
0.84
%
0.88
%
0.91
%
[VALUE] [VALUE]
1.01
%
1.04
%
1.08
%
1.11
%
1.14
%
1.18
%
1.21
%
1.25
%
1.28
%
1.31
%
1.35
%
1.38
%
1.41
%
1.45
%
1.48
%
1.52
%
1.55
%
1.58
%
1.62
%
1.65
%
1.68
%
1.72
%
1.75
%
1.78
%
1.82
%
1.85
%
1.89
%
1.92
%
1.95
%
1.99
%
2.02
%
2.05
%
2.09
%
2.12
%
2.15
%
2.19
%
2.22
%
2.26
%
2.29
%
2.32
%
2.36
%
2.39
%
2.42
%
2.46
%
2.49
%
2.53
%
2.56
%
2.59
%
2.63
%
2.66
%
2.69
%
2.73
%
2.76
%
2.79
%
2.83
%
2.86
%
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
Two(2)OverturnedDeten1ons
Five(5)Deten1onsUnderAppeal
57 Marine Safety Compliance Initiatives Nine (9) USCG PSC Detentions
INOPERATIVE STACK DAMPERS
BEFORE AFTER
13
14
QUICK CLOSING VALVE WITH BLOCK
15
FIRE HAZARDS
16
17
2016 COMPLIANCE INITIATIVES BY VESSEL TYPE
33
13
6
1 1 1 1 13
5
1 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35Compliance Initiatives Detentions
18
2016 RMI TOP SEVEN (7) DETAINABLE DEFICIENCIES
75
45
34 33 30
2217
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
FIRE SAFETY INTERNATIONAL SAFETY
MANAGEMENT (ISM)
VITAL MACHINERY
LIFE-SAVING LOAD LINES ENVIRONMENTAL NAVIGATION SAFETY
19
DETENTION RATES MAJOR MoUs
3.99
1.85
2.7
1.61.36
1.65
2.98
2.46
2.3 1.98
1.64
2.23
0.49
0.72
0.60.64
1.28 0.83
0
1
2
3
4
5
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Paris Tokyo USCG
Note: Percentages are based on the number of detentions to number of inspections.
DEVELOPMENTS WITH PSC
§ Cooperation / Communication
§ Transparency
§ Effort is recognized
§ Responsibility is recognized
§ Both the USCG and the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) work with the Republic of the Marshall Islands flag as part of the Safety Net.
§ In 2013 the Marshall Islands became a full Member of the Tokyo MOU.
20
FLAG STATE AS A REGULATORY BODY
§ RMI’s mission as a Flag State
§ Quality
§ Compliance
§ Value
§ Balance between providing service and enforcing regulations
21
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
§ Report non-operational equipment
§ Report non-operational equipment
§ Report non-operational equipment
22
THANK YOU
www.register-iri.com
23
©Ch
risLew
is
top related