pavement design

1

Pavement Design

CE 453 Lecture 28

2

Objectives Understand and complete ESAL

calculation Know variables involved in and be

able to calculate required thickness of rigid and flexible pavements

3

AASHTO Pavement Design Method Considerations Pavement Performance Traffic Roadbed Soil Materials of Construction Environment Drainage Reliability Life-Cycle Costs Shoulder Design

4

Two Categories of Roadway Pavements

Rigid Pavement Flexible Pavement

Rigid Pavement Typical Applications High volume traffic lanes Freeway to freeway connections Exit ramps with heavy traffic

5

Advantages of Rigid Pavement

Good durability Long service life Withstand repeated flooding and

subsurface water without deterioration

6

Disadvantages of Rigid Pavement

May lose non-skid surface with time Needs even sub-grade with uniform

settling May fault at transverse joints

7

Flexible Pavement Typical Applications Traffic lanes Auxiliary lanes Ramps Parking areas Frontage roads Shoulders

8

Advantages to Flexible Pavement

Adjusts to limited differential settlement

Easily repaired Additional thickness added any time Non-skid properties do not deteriorate Quieter and smoother Tolerates a greater range of

temperatures

9

Disadvantages of Flexible Pavement

Loses some flexibility and cohesion with time

Needs resurfacing sooner than PC concrete

Not normally chosen where water is expected

10

Basic AASHTO Flexible Pavement Design Method Determine the desired terminal

serviceability, pt Convert traffic volumes to number of

equivalent 18-kip single axle loads (ESAL) Determine the structural number, SN Determine the layer coefficients, ai Solve layer thickness equations for

individual layer thickness

11

Basic AASHTO Rigid Pavement Design Method

Select terminal serviceability Determine number of ESALs Determine the modulus of sub-

grade reaction Determine the slab thickness

12

Variables included in Nomographs Reliability, R

• Incorporates a degree of certainty into design process

• Ensures various design alternatives will last the analysis period

Resilient Modulus for Roadbed Soil, MR• Generally obtained from laboratory

testing

13

Variables included in Nomographs Effective Modulus of Sub-Grade

Reaction, k• Considers:

1. Sub-base type2. Sub-base thickness3. Loss of support4. Depth to rigid foundation

Drainage Coefficient, mi• Use in layer thickness determination• Applies only to base and sub-base• See Tables 20.15 (flexible) and 21.9 (rigid)

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Flexible Pavement Design Pavement structure is a multi-layered elastic

system, material is characterized by certain properties Modulus of elasticity Resilient modulus Poisson ratio

Wheel load causes stress distribution (fig 20.2) Horizontal: tensile or compressive Vertical: maximum are compressive, decrease with

depth Temperature distribution: affects magnitude of

stresses

27

Components

Sub-grade (roadbed) course: natural material that serves as the foundation of the pavement structure

Sub-base course: above the sub-grade, superior to sub-grade course

Base course: above the sub base, granular materials such as crushed stone, crushed or uncrushed slag, gravel, and sand

Surface course: upper course of the road pavement, should withstand tire pressures, resistant to abrasive forces of traffic, provide skid-resistant driving surface, prevent penetration of surface water

3 inches to > 6 inches

28

Economic Analysis• Different treatments results in

different designs• Evaluate cost of different

alternatives

29

Sensitivity Analysis• Input different values of traffic

volume • Compare resulting differences in

pavement • Fairly significant differences in ADT

do not yield equally significant differences in pavement thickness

30

OTHER ISSUES Drainage Joints Grooving (noise vs. hydroplaning) Rumble strips Climate Level and type of usage

31

FAILURE EXAMPLES Primarily related to design or life-

cycle, not construction All images from Distress

Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program, Publication No. FHWA-RD-03-031, June 2003

32

FATIGUE CRACKING

33

RUTTING

34

SHOVING

35

PUMPING