oral presentation ce&i services along sr 80, birchwood parkway to dalton lane (fm no....
Post on 17-Dec-2015
221 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Oral PresentationCE&I Services Along SR 80, Birchwood Parkway to Dalton Lane (FM No. 408286-3-62-01)
January 27, 2012
GBF Team Introduction
Sr. Project Engineer - Hamid Hosseini, P.E. Project Administrator – Jim Frye Contract Support Specialist – Carlos Sousa Sr. Bridge Inspector – Felipe Baez-De La Cruz (Atkins) Public Information Officer – Janet Cook (ComVia) QA/QC – Karina Enrico-Jackson, P.E.
Awareness/Approach to ProjectUnderstanding of Scope of Services
Full CEI services for SR-80 widening Engineering services,
on-site inspection, contract administration, survey control, sampling and testing
4.97 miles of roadway reconstruction From two lanes/undivided four lanes/divided roadway
New construction Eastbound roadway Widening, milling and resurfacing of existing roadway
Proposed westbound roadway
Awareness/Approach to ProjectUnderstanding of Scope of Services
Construction of 2 bridges over the Carloosa Branch Canal C-1
Demolition and reconstruction of 2 existing triple box culverts
Reconstruction of Birchwood Parkway intersection
Drainage improvements Structures 17 water detention ponds
Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues
Right-of-Way Parcels acquisition Document review
Temporary Construction Easements (TCEs)
License Agreements (LAs) Stipulated order of takings
Driveways connections Construction adjacent to private
properties Commitments from FDOT and
parcel owners
Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues
Clearing & Grubbing Major activity
Numerous oak trees “Tap rooted” Specifications Section
110-2.2 Backfilling operations
Project area = 117.4 acres Expected to be disturbed: 108.0 acres Allowable erodible earth at a time: 17.21 acres
Disposal of material Burning, chipping and hauling Burning permits and constrains
Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues Earthwork Operations
Major and critical activity New construction of
eastbound roadway 336, 525 cy embankment
Borrow Pit Easily and readily accessible FDOT Specifications
Section 120-6 & Section 8-7 “Time extensions will not be granted if due to the fault or
negligence of the contractor” Contractor must be aware at pre-construction conference
Presence of limestone at shallow depths Pile driving, box culverts and sheet piling
Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues Potential Contamination Areas
Two areas near east end of the project Former rail road grade area Cattle dipping vat area
All soil excavated within railroad grade contamination area must remain within project limits
District’s Contamination Assessment/Remediation (CAR) Contractor must test material if excavated and dispose if necessary Coordination Stockpiling material
Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues Asphalt Operations
7 typical sections Overbuilds ½” to 11” Pre-paving conference
Cross slope correction Paving sequence Control points
Pavement distress at +/-sta. 1855 Sufficient milling depths? Core pavement prior to
construction
Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues
Utility Coordination Majority of utilities on the north side
of the westbound roadway Century Link, Port La Belle Utilities,
Level 3 Communications, Comcast, etc. Port La Belle utilities conflict with
drainage structures S-28 & S28a at sta. 1758+73
Unidentified “buried fiber optic cable” 26RT of CL from sta. 1767 to end
Proactive approach for utility conflict resolution
Two utility work schedules utility coordinator
Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues MOT/Safety
3 Traffic Control Phases Lane closures restrictions
Weekdays 7:00am to 8:30am 4:30pm to 5:30pm
EOR Business/property
entrances Area near Birchwood
intersection not incorporated
Coordination
Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues Environmental/Permits
Proposed eastbound roadway directly over wetlands Staging areas Dewatering
SFWMD & Army Corps of Engineers
SWPPP/NPDES Endangered species Dewatering permits Water quality monitoring
Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues Drainage Structures
31 new drainage structures
2 triple box culverts Minimum conflict with
utilities “Contractor must
maintain positive flow” Two phase construction
sequence
Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues 2 New Bridges (EB and WB) 2 Lanes and Shoulders 4-ft Bicycle Lane EB
Demolition (existing) Remove existing end bent piles Remove intermediate piles
minimum of 2’ below proposed grade line
Pile Driving EB end bents 9 piles; WB end bents 8 piles Jetting is not allowed 4 test piles
Core Boring Reports and Limestone
Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Borrow Pits Nearby
FDOT Specifications Section 120-6 Ave Maria Aggregate Pit Seminole Reservation Pit Baron Water District Pit
Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Cost Saving/Triple Box
Culvert Suggestion Structure S-22 at sta.
1710+48 Overall good
condition No critical cracks
present Further investigation Commitments with
permitting agencies
Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Quality Assurance Approach
Led by Karina Enrico-Jackson, P.E. Develop QA plan specific to project Establish several goals and expectations Periodical reviews semi-annual Final estimates reviews 30, 60 and 90% of contract
funds Monitoring CEI cost Review overall team performance with Project
Manager
Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Unique Concepts / Green Roadway Construction
Project background New rural roadway Endangered species Natural scenery and landscape Army Corps of Engineers, SFWMD, Florida Fish & Wildlife
Commission Greenroads™ Foundation Greenroads™ Rating System
Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Unique Concepts / Green Roadway Construction
Greenroad™ Rating System Created and managed by Greenroads ™ Foundation
CH2M Hill; University of Washington Basic project requirements first step Voluntary/custom credits not required, varies from
project to project 4 different certification levels
Certified, silver, gold and evergreen
Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Unique
Concepts / Green Roadway Construction
Basic project requirement credits
Requirement
PR-1 Environmental Review Process
PR-2 Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)
PR-3 Life Cycle Inventory (LCI)
PR-4 Quality Control Plan
PR-5 Noise Mitigation Plan
PR-6 Waste Management Plan
PR-7 Pollution Prevention Plan
PR-8 Low-Impact Development (LID) Study
PR-9 Pavement Management System
PR-10 Site Maintenance Plan
PR-11 Education Outreach
DOES NOT GUARANTEE CERTIFICATION
Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Unique Concepts / Green Roadway Construction
Voluntary and Custom Credits Environment & water Storm water, habitat, vegetation,
etc. Access & equity Culture, aesthetics, safety, etc. Construction activities Construction equipment, process,
quality Materials & resources Material extraction, processing,
transport Pavement technology Pavement design, materials,
function Custom Proposed
32-42 pts 43-54 pts 55-63 pts 64 + pts
PROJECT RATING
Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Unique Concepts / Green Roadway Construction
How the Process Works
Apply
Agreement
Assessment
Award
Eligibility is determined Project Number is assigned Greenroads™ Reviewer is assigned
Sign review agreement Schedule Introductory Presentation/Webinar
Preliminary review Make corrections Submit for final review
Rating is assigned Put up the Greenroads sign
Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added
Unique Concepts / Green Roadway Construction Types of Review and Assessment
•Single project review•Certification can be awarded
•Post-construction review•High dollar projects
•Low budget projects•Disjointed segment projects
•Multiple projects for a single owner
•Pre-certification review based on BPR•Not certified without previous approval of roadway owner-agency
Basic Project Rating (BPR)
Phased Project Review (PPR)
Capital Improvements Package
Agency Customization Package
Consultant/Contractor Package
Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added
Unique Concepts / Green Roadway Construction Why is this a great idea?
Minimize impact on ecosystem/promote sustainability Help Department save money
ex: Recycled materials can create 17% in savings Warm mix asphalt can save $0.35-$5.00/ton Long lasting roads that require less
maintenance Sustainable construction practices can help Department
receive more federal funds and stimulate market Will set precedent in Florida
No Greenroads™ project has ever been constructed in the StateGBF is ready to assist the Department in this new
venture and will assume all the costs associated with this concept
Proposed StaffingQuantity Proposed - Team Organization
FDOT Project ManagerTimothy Hendrix, P.E.
QA/QC
Karina Enrico-Jackson, P.E. (GBF)
Sr. Project Engineer
Hamid Hosseini, P.E. (GBF)
Project Administrator
James “Jim” Frye (GBF)
Sr. Roadway/Bridge Inspectors
Felipe Baez-De La Cruz (Atkins)Brian O’Neill (GBF)
Contract Support Specialist
Carlos Sousa (GBF)
Inspectors
Eduardo Mendez, E.I. GBF)Israel Rodriguez (GBF)Shaista Javed (Atkins)
As Needed Services
Survey (EAI) (DBE)Stephen Tate, PSM
Richard StepGeotechnical
Engineering/PDA (AFT)Michael Muchard P.E.
Donald Robertson, P.E.Public Information
(ComVia)Janet Cook
Utility Coordination (GBF)
Michael Posten
Asphalt Plant Inspector
Roberto Martinez. GBF)
Proposed StaffingQualifications/Availability/Certifications
Cross-trained personnel with immediate availability
Proposed StaffingStaffing Quality/Qualifications
Proposed Personnel Yrs of Exp. Experience Highlights
Hamid Hosseini, P.E.Sr. Project Engineer
25 Proven Performance in District 1 and Fort Myers Operations; Sr. Project Engineer on the SR 70 corridor in St. Lucie County, reconstruction of a two-lane, two-way undivided highway to a four lane divided rural highway, identical to the work anticipated on this project
James “Jim” FryeProject Administrator
42 Significant contractor/CEI experience in roadway and bridge reconstruction projects; Proactive in staying ahead of the contractor and recommending viable resolutions; Currently PA to the FMOC on the I-75 Alley
Carlos SousaCSS
20 Stellar post audit reviews; Additional CTQP certs in Concrete Field Technician, Levels I & II allow him ability to understand field operations as it relates to concrete pours which are anticipated on this project
Felipe Baez-De La CruzSr. Inspector
12 Recently the Senior Inspector for roadway improvements onUS 27 and SR 80 in Hendry County; Familiar with the project limits and understands expectations of FMOC.
Brian O’NeillSr. Inspector
7 Recent/current experience with Fort Myers Operations and District 1; Currently Sr. Inspector on the I-75 (Alley) at Alley Recreational Access
Israel RodriguezRoadway/ITS Inspector
9 CEI focus on roadway reconstruction and ITS projects; well versed in the areas of ITS and fiber optics; IMSA certified; Currently Inspector on the I-75 (Alley) at Alley Recreational Access
Proposed StaffingStaffing Quality/Qualifications
Proposed Personnel Yrs of Exp. Experience Overview
Eduardo Mendez, E.I.Roadway/Bridge Inspector
1 Very knowledgeable of FDOT District 1 policies and procedures and is currently Inspector on I-75 (Alley) at Alley Recreational Access
Shaista JavedBridge Inspector
20 Degreed architect with horizontal and vertical CEI experience; District 1 experience includes widening of SR 80 at Palomino Dr. and Indian Hills
Roberto MartinezAsphalt Plant Inspector
7 Highly knowledgeable in asphalt paving and asphalt plant operations; IMSA certified; Experience in District 1
Karina Enrico-Jackson, P.E.QA/QC
12 Experience with Fort Myers Operations and District 1; Former FDOT Engineer/PE Trainee
Janet CookPublic Information
17 Former FDOT employee for 12 years; Very knowledgeable of District 1 and FMOC having managed the District 1 Consultant CCEI and DistrictWide programs for over 6 years
Stephen Tate, PSMSurvey Manager
28 Significant survey experience with District 1
Michael Muchard, P.E. Sr. Geotechnical Engineer
22 Significant foundation testing experience in District 1; Considered an expert in STATNAMIC™, dynamic, and Static load testing methods
Michael PostenUtility Coordination
45 Significant FDOT utility relocation experience including recent experience on the I-595 Expansion
A Proven District 1 Team that Will Ensure Success
Proposed StaffingSimilar Experience (GBF)
Reconstruction of 3.1 miles of a two lane, two-way undivided highway to a four lane divided rural highway
Construction of 2 bridges Rehabilitation of 1 bridge, a
12’ shared use path Major earthwork Drainage Revetment activities Recipient of the Davis
Productivity Award SR 70 Segment 4 ($18m)
Grade 4.7
Proposed StaffingSimilar Experience (GBF)
Reconstruction of 4.3 miles of a two lane, two way undivided highway to a four lane divided rural
Construction of 5 bridges Bridge widening 3 mile continuation of
the 12’ shared use path Major earthwork Drainage Revetment activities SR 70 Segment 5 ($29m)
Grade 4.7
Proposed StaffingSimilar Experience (GBF)
Reconstruction of 4.3 miles of a two lane undivided to a four lane divided rural roadway
Horizontal roadway realignment
Culvert construction Canal relocation Utility relocation Major drainage improvements Public information
SR 70 Segment 3 ($13m) (On Going)
Other ConsiderationsCommunication Abilities
Critical elements of project success Communication Information sharing Project specific email accounts Easy access to project data through
internal VPN network “Citrix” & “Microsoft Exchange”
All GBF staff are proficient with computers and relevant software Site Manager, LIMS, Hummingbird, etc.
Equipped with tools for flexibility and quick response i.e. Laptops with wireless internet cards, Mi-Fis, smart
phones with digital cameras
Other Considerations Commitment to Satisfy Department Needs
Proven team with the FMOC Quality projects
Proven performance with FMOC Excellent communication with
FDOT project manager Resolve construction issues
at lowest possible level Timely completion of required documentation
On-time, on-budget project delivery Quality close-outs Innovative ideas
FDOT is our #1 Client
Why Choose the GBF Team
Deliver quality project exceeding budget and time goals “No learning curve”
Proven performance with FMOC Strong team with qualified and experienced personnel
familiar with District 1 and Fort Myers Ops policy, procedures and organization
Provide sound project management Accurate record keeping Extensive similar experience with District 1 Consistent commitment to quality
top related