oesi forum risk awareness & perception,oesi.tamu.edu/uploads/may 2014 risk forum/day 1/session...

1

Session III:

What are effective leading risk indicators of future process safety performance

OESI Forum Risk Awareness & Perception,

12 & 13 May 2014

Safety & Environmental Management Systems

(SEMS)

2

• Goal: Safe & Reliable Operations / Operational Integrity

• SEMS is a key mechanism to reduce the likelihood of

major incidents

Current State

• Good systems with analysis exist

• Generally good culture of reporting

Areas for Enhancement

• Not shared between organizations

• Safety culture could further encourage reporting

• Analysis could be improved to allow system learning

• Legal protection could improve sharing

• Many existing data bases not well analyzed

• Not necessarily true that pyramid or near misses are indicative of major incidents

3

4

Phase 1 SPI

A. Fatality

B. Injury to 5 or more persons in a single incident

C. Tier 1 process safety event

D. Loss of well control

E. $1 million direct cost from damage to or loss of facility /vessel / equipment

F. Oil spill to water > or equal to 10,000 gallons (238 barrels)

A. Tier 2 Process safety event

B. Collisions that result in property or equipment damage > $25,000

C. Crane or personnel/material handling operations

D. Loss of station keeping resulting in drive off or drift off

E. Life boat, life raft, or rescue boat event

SPI 3: Percentage of SPI 1 and SPI 2 incidents that involved failure of one or more of COS specified equipment as a contributing factor

SPI 5: % of critical maintenance, inspections and tests completed on time

SPI 6: Number of fatalities

SPI 7: DART

SPI 8: Recordable Injury and Illness Rate

SPI 9: Oil spills > 1 bbl

SPI 1: frequency of work-

related incidents resulting in one or more of the following

SPI 2: Frequency of work-

related incidents that do not meet the definition of a SPI 1 incident but have resulted in one or more of the following:

5

Phase I SPI Bow TieTM Coverage

Barrier Elements

SPI 1A

SPI 1B

SPI 1C

SPI 1D

SPI 1E

SPI 1F

SPI 2B

SPI 2A

SPI 2C

SPI 2D

SPI 2E

SPI 5

SPI 3

SPI 6

SPI 7

SPI 8

SPI 9

SPI 3

6

LFI Program Scope

A. Fatality

B. Injury to 5 or more persons in a single incident

C. Tier 1 process safety event

D. Loss of well control

E. $1 mil direct cost from damage to or loss of facility/vessel/ equipment

F. Oil spill to water > or equal to 10,000 gallons (238 barrels)

A. Tier 2 process safety event

B. Collisions that result in property or equipment damage > $25,000

C. Crane or personnel/material handling operations incident

D. Loss of station keeping resulting in drive off or drift off

E. Life boat, life raft, or rescue boat incident

SPI 1

SPI 2

7

LFI Program Scope

High Value Learning Event

An event that may be considered for use as a reference in process hazard analyses, management of changes, project design, risk assessments, inspections, operating procedures reviews and/or training. HVLEs should meet 1 or more of the criteria below:

A. Identify a previously unknown risk, situation, operational or mechanical hazard, or critical equipment failure

B. Identify a previously unknown combination of factors that resulted in an unexpected condition or event.

C. Identify a routine operation or activity that created a previously unidentified risk or consequence

D. Identify a situation where established industry designs, controls or procedures failed to prevent an event (e.g. loss of wall thickness).

E. An event that is part of a pattern in industry events which could indicate that certain hazardous conditions are not well understood.

8

Areas for Improvement and Additional Comments • Physical Process and Equipment

• Design • Material Construction • Reliability • Instrumentation & Controls

• Administrative Process • Risk Assessment and Management • Operating Procedures or Safe Work Practices • Management of Change • Work Direction or Management • Emergency Response

• People • Personnel Skills or Knowledge • Quality of Task Planning and Preparation • Individual or Group Decision-Making • Quality of Task Execution • Quality of Hazard Mitigation • Communication

9

LESSONS LEARNED.

Describe lessons

learned and actions

taken to reduce the

likelihood of a

recurrence

Lessons:

Questions Charlie Williams

Center for Offshore Safety

Executive Director williamsc@centerforoffshoresafety.org

THANK YOU

11

Data Requested

OGP Learning Workshop - Mar 31 2014

• General: date, time, location, water depth

• Description

• Site Type

• Operation Type

• Activity Type

• Incident or Event Category

• Incident Consequences

• Areas for improvement

• Lessons Learned

12

Data Requested

OGP Learning Workshop - Mar 31 2014

Site Type

• Aircraft

• Diving Vessel

• Drilling Rig on Production Facility

• Fixed Production Facility

• Floating Production Facility

• Floating Storage and Offloading Facility

• Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit

• Offshore Supply or Support Vessel

• Offshore Construction Vessel

• Seismic Vessel

• Subsea Production System

• Other

13

Data Requested

OGP Learning Workshop - Mar 31 2014

Operation Type

• Aviation

• Marine - Diving, Seismic, Transportation, Rig Moves, etc.

• Production – Petroleum, Natural Gas Production, Flow Lines, Pipe Lines

• Projects – Includes Offshore Construction Activities

• Wells – Exploration, Appraisal, Production Drilling, Wireline, Completion, Workover, Abandonment, Intervention Activities

• Other

14

Data Requested

OGP Learning Workshop - Mar 31 2014

Activity Type

• Confined Space Entry

• Diving

• Drilling Activities – Normal, Routine

• Energy Isolation

• Emergency Response (Actual or Drill)

• Helicopter Flight

• Helicopter Landing or Take-Off

• Hot Work

• Maintenance, Inspection and Testing

• Marine Vessel – In-Transit

• Marine Vessel – Station Keeping

• Material Transfer or Displacement

• Mechanical Lifting or Lowering

• Production Activities – Normal, Routine

• Simultaneous Operations

• Start-Up or Shut-Down Operations

• Working At Height

• Other

15

Data Requested

OGP Learning Workshop - Mar 31 2014

• Areas for improvement

• Physical Facility, Equipment and Process

• Administrative Processes

• People

Multiple Areas for Improvement can be checked

16 OGP Learning Workshop - Mar 31 2014 16

Physical Facility, Equipment and Process

Enhancements in the quality of the physical process and equipment design, layout, material specification, fabrication, or construction were highlighted for improvement, including:

• Process or Equipment Design or Layout

• Process or Equipment Material Specification, Fabrication and Construction

• Process or Equipment Reliability

• Instrument, Analyzer and Controls Reliability

Data Requested

17 OGP Learning Workshop - Mar 31 2014 17

Administrative Processes

Enhancements in the quality, scope or structure of administrative processes for managing various aspects of work execution were highlighted for improvement, including:

• Risk Assessment and Management

• Operating Procedures or Safe Work Practices

• Management of Change

• Work Direction or Management

• Emergency Response

Data Requested

18 OGP Learning Workshop - Mar 31 2014 18

People

Enhancements to the personnel actions linked to the execution of work tasks were highlighted for improvement, including:

• Personnel Skills or Knowledge

• Quality of Task Planning and Preparation

• Individual or Group Decision-Making

• Quality of Task Execution

• Quality of Hazard Mitigation

• Communication

Data Requested

19 OGP Learning Workshop - Mar 31 2014 19

• LFI Committee

• Blind sharing by members – 3rd Party Reviewer

• Year round sharing

• Quarterly review of and learning from LFI data

• Annual Performance Report

LFI Process