noise feasibility study proposed residential development ... · region of peel, ontario. lands...
Post on 03-Mar-2021
7 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Noise Feasibility Study
Proposed Residential Development
2207 Dixie Road
Mississauga, Ontario
Prepared for:
Fountain Hill Construction and Consulting Ltd.
200 Ronson Drive, Suite 101 Etobicoke, ON M9W 5Z9
Prepared by
Harry Cai, BEng, EIT
Reviewed by
Sheeba Paul, MEng, PEng
November 6, 2019
HGC Project No: 01900470
Table of Contents
1 Introduction and Summary .......................................................................................................1
2 Site Description and Noise Sources..........................................................................................2
3 Noise Level Criteria ..................................................................................................................3
3.1 Road Traffic Noise ............................................................................................................3
4 Traffic Sound Level Assessment ..............................................................................................5
4.1 Road Traffic Data ..............................................................................................................5
4.2 Road Traffic Noise Predictions .........................................................................................5
5 Discussions and Recommendations..........................................................................................7
5.1 Outdoor Living Areas........................................................................................................7
5.2 Indoor Living Areas and Ventilation Requirements .........................................................7
5.3 Building Façade Constructions .........................................................................................7
6 Warning Clauses .......................................................................................................................9
7 Summary and Recommendations ...........................................................................................10
7.1 Implementation................................................................................................................10
Figure 1: Key Plan
Figure 2: Proposed Plan Showing Prediction Locations
Figure 3: Proposed Plan Showing Ventilation Requirements
Appendix A: Road Traffic Information
Appendix B: Sample STAMSON 5.04 Output
Appendix C: Supportive Drawings
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 1 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019
1 Introduction and Summary
HGC Engineering was retained by Fountain Hill Construction and Consulting Ltd. to conduct a noise
feasibility study for a proposed residential development located at 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga,
Region of Peel, Ontario. Lands surrounding the subject site are predominantly residential. The
residential development will consist of one block of 4 townhouse units including a deck over the
laneway at the rear. The study is required by the City of Mississauga and Region of Peel as part of
the planning and approvals process.
The primary sources of noise were determined to be road traffic from Dixie Road and The
Queensway. Road traffic data was obtained from the Region of Peel for both Dixie Road and The
Queensway. The predicted sound levels were compared to the guidelines of the Ministry of
Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP), the Region of Peel and the City of Mississauga to
develop noise control recommendations.
The results of the study indicate that the future daytime and nighttime sound levels of all facades
with exposure to Dixie Road will exceed MECP guidelines and will require noise control measures.
Central air conditioning units are required for all 4 residential units, and upgraded building
components are required for the façades facing The Queensway and Dixie Road. Noise warning
clauses are also required for those units to inform future occupants of traffic noise impact and to
address sound level excesses. For the east façade, any building construction meeting the minimum
requirements of the Ontario Building Code will provide sufficient acoustical insulation for indoor
spaces.
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 2 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019
2 Site Description and Noise Sources
Figure 1 is a key plan indicating the location of the proposed site. The site is located at the northeast
intersection of Dixie Road and Venta Ave in the City of Mississauga, Ontario. Figure 2 shows the
proposed site plan by Otto Palfy dated August 26, 2019. The proposed development will consist of
one block of 4 townhouse residential units with landscaped area and elevated decks at the rear.
HGC Engineering personnel visited the site on July 25, 2019 to make observations of the acoustical
environment. During the site visit, it was noted that the primary source of noise impacting the site is
road traffic on Dixie Road, with minor impact from traffic on The Queensway. Negligible impact
from road traffic was observed from Venta Ave. The site is currently occupied by a single storey
residential building, which will be demolished for the construction of the proposed townhouse block.
Existing two storey residences surround the site area immediately to the north and east. Areas around
the site area is flat and mostly residential. There are some commercial/medical uses on the west side
of Dixie Road. There are no significant sources of stationary noise within 500 m of the subject site.
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 3 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019
3 Noise Level Criteria
3.1 Road Traffic Noise
Guidelines for acceptable levels of road traffic noise impacting residential developments are given in
the MECP publication NPC-300, “Environmental Noise Guideline Stationary and Transportation
Sources – Approval and Planning”, release date October 21, 2013, and are listed in Table I below.
The values in Table I are energy equivalent (average) sound levels [LEQ] in units of A-weighted
decibels [dBA].
Table I: MECP Road Traffic Noise Criteria (dBA)
Area Daytime LEQ (16 hour)
Road
Nighttime LEQ (8 hour)
Road
Outdoor Living Area 55 dBA --
Inside Living/Dining Rooms 45 dBA 45 dBA
Inside Bedrooms 45 dBA 40 dBA
Daytime refers to the period between 07:00 and 23:00. Nighttime refers to the time period between
23:00 and 07:00. The term “Outdoor Living Area” (OLA) is used in reference to an outdoor patio, a
backyard, a terrace, or other area where passive recreation is expected to occur. Small balconies are
not considered OLAs for the purposes of assessment. Terraces greater than 4 m in depth (measured
perpendicular to the building façade) are considered to be OLAs.
The guidelines in the MECP publication allow the daytime sound levels in an Outdoor Living Area
to be exceeded by up to 5 dBA, without mitigation, if warning clauses are placed in the purchase and
rental agreements to the property. Where OLA sound levels exceed 60 dBA, physical mitigation is
required to reduce the OLA sound level to below 60 dBA and as close to 55 dBA as technically,
economically, and administratively practical. The maximum acoustic fence height in the Region of
Peel is 2.0 m with a maximum combined berm and fence height of 4 m, and fence heights up to
2.4 m have been considered in the past. In the case that the guideline criterion of 55 dBA cannot be
met, it must be demonstrated to the Region of Peel that it is not technically feasible to meet the
55 dBA criterion with a warning clause. The City of Mississauga allows up to a 5 dBA excess from
the MECP guideline criteria for OLA sound levels if tenants and purchasers are notified by
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 4 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019
appropriate warning clauses, and road noise necessitating central air conditioning or provisions for
central air conditioning will also require notices stipulated by the MECP guideline.
A central air conditioning system as an alternative means of ventilation to open windows is required
for dwellings where nighttime sound levels outside bedroom or living/dining room windows exceed
60 dBA (60 dBA or greater for the Region of Peel) or daytime sound levels outside bedroom or
living/dining room windows exceed 65 dBA. Forced-air ventilation with ducts sized to accommodate
the future installation of air conditioning is required when nighttime sound levels at bedroom or
living/dining room windows are in the range of 51 to 59 dBA or when daytime sound levels at
bedroom or living/dining room windows are in the range of 56 to 65 dBA.
Building components such as walls, windows and doors must be designed to achieve indoor sound
level criteria when the plane of window nighttime sound level is greater than 60 dBA (60 dBA or
greater for the Region of Peel) or the daytime sound level is greater than 65 dBA due to road traffic
noise.
Warning clauses to notify future residents of possible noise excesses are also required when
nighttime sound levels exceed 50 dBA at the plane of the bedroom or living/dining room window
and daytime sound levels exceed 55 dBA in the outdoor living area and at the plane of the bedroom
or living/dining room window due to road traffic.
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 5 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019
4 Traffic Sound Level Assessment
4.1 Road Traffic Data
Traffic data for Dixie Road was obtained from the Region of Peel in the form of ultimate AADT
traffic values, and is provided in Appendix A. An ultimate volume of 48 600 vehicles per day at a
posted speed limit of 60 km/h was applied for the analysis. A commercial vehicle percentage of 3.3%
for medium trucks and 2.1% for heavy trucks was applied. A day/night split of 92%/8% was used as
provided in the data.
Traffic data for The Queensway was obtained from the Region of Peel in the form of ultimate AADT
traffic values, and is provided in Appendix A. An ultimate volume of 32 400 vehicles per day at a
posted speed limit of 60 km/h was applied for the analysis. A commercial vehicle percentage of 3.4%
for medium trucks and 3.9% for heavy trucks was applied. A day/night split of 97%/3% was used as
provided in the data. Table II summarizes the traffic volume data used in this study.
Table II: Ultimate Road Traffic Data
Road Name Cars Medium
Trucks
Heavy
Trucks Total
Dixie Road
Daytime 42 298 1 475 939 44 712
Nighttime 3 678 128 82 3 888
Total 45 976 1 604 1 021 48 600
The Queensway
Daytime 29 134 1 069 1 226 31 428
Nighttime 901 33 38 972
Total 30 035 1 102 1 264 32 400
4.2 Road Traffic Noise Predictions
To assess the levels of road traffic noise which will impact the study area in the future, sound level
predictions were made using STAMSON version 5.04, a computer algorithm developed by the
MECP. Sample STAMSON output is included in Appendix B.
Predictions of the traffic sound levels were chosen around the proposed residential building to obtain
an appropriate representation of future sound levels at various façades. Sound levels were predicted
at the plane of the 4th storey bedroom and/or living/dining room windows during daytime and
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 6 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019
nighttime hours to investigate ventilation and façade construction requirements. Figure 2 shows the
concept plan of the site with prediction locations. The results of these predictions are summarized in
Table III.
Table III: Predicted Road Traffic Sound Levels [dBA], Without Mitigation
Prediction
Location Description
Daytime
– in the
OLA
LEQ-16 hr
Daytime
– at the
Façade
LEQ-16 hr
Nighttime
– at the
Facade
LEQ-8 hr
A Façade facing Queensway -- 68 60
B Façade facing Dixie Rd -- 71 63
C Façade facing Venta Ave -- 67 59
D Façade facing deck -- 55 <50
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 7 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019
5 Discussions and Recommendations
The sound level predictions indicate that the future traffic sound levels at the facades with direct or
flanking exposure to Dixie Road and The Queensway are above the MECP guideline criteria. The
following discussion outlines the recommendations for acoustic barrier requirements, ventilation
requirements, upgraded building façade construction, and warning clauses to achieve the noise
criteria stated in Table I.
5.1 Outdoor Living Areas
The dwelling units in the proposed residential building have elevated decks at the rear that are less
than 4 m in depth. These areas are not considered to be outdoor living areas under MECP guidelines,
and therefore are exempt from traffic noise assessment.
There are no other common outdoor amenity areas indicated on the site plan.
5.2 Indoor Living Areas and Ventilation Requirements
Air Conditioning
The predicted future sound levels outside the 4th storey window with direct or flanking exposure to
Dixie Road are greater than 65 dBA during daytime hours and/or 59 dBA during nighttime hours. To
address these excesses, all 4 townhouses units are required to be equipped with central air
conditioning systems so that windows may remain closed. These townhouse units are shown in
Figure 3. Window or through-the-wall air conditioning units are not recommended because of the
noise they produce and because the units penetrate through the exterior wall which degrades the
overall sound insulating properties of the envelope. The location, installation and sound ratings of the
outdoor air conditioning devices should minimize noise impacts and comply with criteria of MECP
publication NPC-300, as applicable.
5.3 Building Façade Constructions
The predicted sound levels at the façades with exposure Dixie Road will exceed 65 dBA during
daytime and/or 60 dBA during nighttime. MECP guidelines stipulate that in such cases, building
components including windows, walls, and doors be designed so that the indoor sound levels comply
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 8 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019
with the noise criteria in Table I.
The required building components are selected based on the Acoustical Insulation Factor (AIF) value
for road traffic. Calculations were performed to determine the acoustical insulation factors to
maintain indoor sound levels within MECP guidelines. The calculation methods were developed by
the National Research Council (NRC). They are based on the predicted future sound levels at the
building facades, and the area ratios of the facade components (walls, windows and doors) and the
floor area of the adjacent room.
A summary of the Sound Transmission Class (STC) requirements are provided in Table IV based on
the possibility of sound entering the building through windows only since the exterior wall is mainly
brick. Window to floor area ratios and wall to floor area ratios were calculated from the elevation
details dated August 26, 2019, provided in Appendix C, to determine window STC ratings to
mitigate road traffic noise. The window to flor ratios was measured to be 25 % for living/dining
rooms, and ranges from 12 % to 23 % for bedrooms.
Table IV: Minimum STC Requirements
Prediction
Location Description Space
STC Glazing
Requirements
A Façade facing Queensway Living/Dining STC-30
Bedroom STC-30
B Façade facing Dixie Rd Living/Dining STC-30
Bedroom STC-30
C Façade facing Venta Ave Living/Dining STC-30
Bedroom OBC Notes: OBC – Ontario Building Code
The other façade of the proposed residential building, which is facing away from the road traffic
noise source, has predicted sound levels less than or equal to 65 dBA during daytime and less than or
equal to 60 dBA during nighttime. Thus, any exterior wall and double-glazed window construction
meeting the minimum requirements of the Ontario Building Code (OBC) will provide adequate
sound insulation.
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 9 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019
6 Warning Clauses
The MECP guidelines recommend that warning clauses be included in the property and tenancy
agreements and offers of purchase and sale for all lots/units with anticipated traffic sound level
excesses. The following noise warning clauses are required for specific dwellings as indicated in
Table V.
Suggested wording for future dwellings with façade sound levels exceeding the MECP criteria for
which building design and air conditioning have been specified is given below.
Type A:
Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the
development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic may
occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels
exceed the Municipality’s and the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks noise
criteria.
Suggest wording for future dwellings which will have central air conditioning units to be installed is
given below.
Type B:
This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow
windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels
are within the sound level limits of the Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment,
Conservation and Parks.
These sample clauses are provided by the MECP as examples, and can be modified by the
Municipality as required.
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 10 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019
7 Summary and Recommendations
The following list and Table V summarize the recommendations made in this report. The reader is
referred to Figure 3 and previous sections of the report where these recommendations are applied and
discussed in more detail.
1. Central air conditioning units will be required for the four townhouse units such that windows
may remain closed.
2. Upgraded glazing construction will be required for the façade facing Dixie Road, as indicated
in Table IV and V. Building constructions meeting the minimum requirements of the Ontario
Building Code will provide sufficient acoustical insultation for the remaining façades.
3. The use of warning clauses in the property and tenancy agreements is recommended to
inform future residents of traffic noise issues.
Table V: Summary of Noise Control Requirements and Noise Warning Clauses
Description Acoustic
Barrier
Ventilation
Requirements*
Type of
Warning
Clause
STC Glazing
Requirements
Façade facing Queensway -- Central A/C A, B LR/DR: STC-30
BR: STC-30
Façade facing Dixie Rd -- Central A/C A, B LR/DR: STC-30
BR: STC-30
Façade facing Venta Ave -- Central A/C A, B LR/DR: STC-30
BR: OBC
Façade facing deck -- Central A/C A, B OBC
Notes: * The location, installation and sound rating of the air conditioning condensers must be compliant with MECP
Guideline NPC-300, as applicable.
-- no specific requirement
OBC – Meeting the minimum requirements of the Ontario Building Code
LR/DR: Living Room/Dining Room
BR: Bedroom
7.1 Implementation
To ensure that the noise control recommendations outlined above are properly implemented, it is
recommended that:
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 11 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019
1. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the Municipality’s building inspector or a
Professional Engineer qualified to perform acoustical engineering services in the Province of
Ontario should certify that the noise control measures have been properly installed, and
constructed.
A-1
SITE PLAN
Fountain HillConstruction &Consulting Ltd.
4-UNIT TOWNHOMES
townhomes4- storey
Lot 2Lot 1
Lot 4Lot 3
AREA MAP
QUEENSWAY EAST
DIX
IE
R
OA
D
SUBJECT SITE
N
CO
NS
TR
UC
TIO
N
NO
RT
H
A-1
SITE PLAN
Fountain HillConstruction &Consulting Ltd.
4-UNIT TOWNHOMES
townhomes4- storey
Lot 2Lot 1
Lot 4Lot 3
AREA MAP
QUEENSWAY EAST
DIX
IE
R
OA
D
SUBJECT SITE
N
CO
NS
TR
UC
TIO
N
NO
RT
H
Appendix A
Road Traffic Information
Date: July 22, 2019 From: Harry Cai, HGC Engineering Re: Ultimate Traffic Data Request – 2207 Dixie Rd Harry, As per your request, we are providing the following traffic data:
Existing Ultimate
24 Hour Traffic Volume 26,880 48,600
# of Lanes 4 6
Day/Night Split 92/8 92/8
Day Trucks (% of Total Volume)
2.2% Medium 2.1% Heavy
2.2% Medium 2.1% Heavy
Night Trucks (% of Total Volume)
3.3% Medium 2.1% Heavy
3.3% Medium 2.1% Heavy
Right-of-Way Width
45 meters
Posted Speed Limit 60 km/h
Please note:
1. The current volume is not the Annual Average Daily Traffic, but the averaged raw volumes over three data collection days. If you need the Annual Average Traffic Volume, please visit the Peel Open Data website below: http://opendata.peelregion.ca/data-categories/transportation/traffic-count-stations.aspx
2. The ultimate volume is the planned volume during a level of service ‘D’ where a 2 second vehicle headway and a volume to capacity ratio of 0.9 is assumed. Traffic signals and hourly variations in traffic are also incorporated into the ultimate volume.
If you require further assistance, please contact me at (905) 791-7800 ext. 4810 Regards, Viktoriya Zaytseva Transportation Analyst, Transportation System Planning Transportation Division, Public Works, Region of Peel 10 Peel Centre Drive, Suite B, 4th Floor, Brampton, ON, L6T 4B9 E: viktoriya.zaytseva@peelregion.ca • W: 905-791-7800 x4810
Date: July 22, 2019 From: Harry Cai, HGC Engineering Re: Ultimate Traffic Data Request – Queensway at Dixie Rd Harry, As per your request, we are providing the following traffic data:
Existing Ultimate
24 Hour Traffic Volume 32,214 32,400
# of Lanes 4 4
Day/Night Split 97/3 97/3
Day Trucks (% of Total Volume)
2.1% Medium 3.9% Heavy
2.1% Medium 3.9% Heavy
Night Trucks (% of Total Volume)
3.4% Medium 3.2% Heavy
3.4% Medium 3.2% Heavy
Right-of-Way Width
45 meters
Posted Speed Limit 60 km/h
Please note:
1. The current volume is not the Annual Average Daily Traffic, but the averaged raw volumes over three data collection days. If you need the Annual Average Traffic Volume, please visit the Peel Open Data website below: http://opendata.peelregion.ca/data-categories/transportation/traffic-count-stations.aspx
2. The ultimate volume is the planned volume during a level of service ‘D’ where a 2 second vehicle headway and a volume to capacity ratio of 0.9 is assumed. Traffic signals and hourly variations in traffic are also incorporated into the ultimate volume.
If you require further assistance, please contact me at (905) 791-7800 ext. 4810 Regards, Viktoriya Zaytseva Transportation Analyst, Transportation System Planning Transportation Division, Public Works, Region of Peel 10 Peel Centre Drive, Suite B, 4th Floor, Brampton, ON, L6T 4B9 E: viktoriya.zaytseva@peelregion.ca • W: 905-791-7800 x4810
Appendix B
Sample STAMSON 5.04 Output
STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 06-11-2019 16:55:01MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT
Filename: a.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hoursDescription: Location A, Facade Facing Queensway
Road data, segment # 1: Queensway (day/night)---------------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 14567/451 veh/TimePeriod *Medium truck volume : 534/17 veh/TimePeriod *Heavy truck volume : 613/19 veh/TimePeriod *Posted speed limit : 60 km/hRoad gradient : 0 %Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)
* Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input:
24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 16200 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 3.40 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 3.90 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 97.00
Data for Segment # 1: Queensway (day/night)-------------------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 135.00 / 135.00 mReceiver height : 10.50 / 10.50 mTopography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier)Barrier angle1 : 30.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 degBarrier height : 7.00 mBarrier receiver distance : 5.00 / 5.00 mSource elevation : 0.00 mReceiver elevation : 0.00 mBarrier elevation : 0.00 mReference angle : 0.00Road data, segment # 2: Queensway (day/night)---------------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 14567/451 veh/TimePeriod *Medium truck volume : 534/17 veh/TimePeriod *Heavy truck volume : 613/19 veh/TimePeriod *Posted speed limit : 60 km/hRoad gradient : 0 %Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)
* Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input:
24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 16200 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 3.40 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 3.90 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 97.00
Data for Segment # 2: Queensway (day/night)-------------------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 3 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 160.00 / 160.00 mReceiver height : 4.50 / 10.50 mTopography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier)Barrier angle1 : 30.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 degBarrier height : 7.00 mBarrier receiver distance : 5.00 / 5.00 mSource elevation : 0.00 mReceiver elevation : 0.00 mBarrier elevation : 0.00 mReference angle : 0.00Road data, segment # 3: Dixie (day/night)-----------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 21149/1839 veh/TimePeriod *Medium truck volume : 738/64 veh/TimePeriod *Heavy truck volume : 469/41 veh/TimePeriod *Posted speed limit : 60 km/hRoad gradient : 0 %Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)
* Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input:
24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 24300 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 3.30 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 2.10 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00
Data for Segment # 3: Dixie (day/night)---------------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 0.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface)Receiver source distance : 21.00 / 21.00 mReceiver height : 10.50 / 10.50 mTopography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)Reference angle : 0.00
Road data, segment # 4: Dixie (day/night)-----------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 21149/1839 veh/TimePeriod *Medium truck volume : 738/64 veh/TimePeriod *Heavy truck volume : 469/41 veh/TimePeriod *Posted speed limit : 60 km/hRoad gradient : 0 %Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)
* Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input:
24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 24300 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 3.30 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 2.10 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00
Data for Segment # 4: Dixie (day/night)---------------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 0.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface)Receiver source distance : 34.00 / 34.00 mReceiver height : 10.50 / 10.50 mTopography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)Reference angle : 0.00Results segment # 1: Queensway (day)------------------------------------
Source height = 1.41 m
Barrier height for grazing incidence------------------------------------Source ! Receiver ! Barrier ! Elevation ofHeight (m) ! Height (m) ! Height (m) ! Barrier Top (m)------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.41 ! 10.50 ! 10.16 ! 10.16
ROAD (53.65 + 49.88 + 0.00) = 55.17 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-90 30 0.39 69.43 0.00 -13.29 -2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 90 0.00 69.43 0.00 -9.54 -4.77 0.00 0.00 -0.13 54.98* 30 90 0.39 69.43 0.00 -13.29 -6.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Bright Zone !
Segment Leq : 55.17 dBA
Results segment # 2: Queensway (day)------------------------------------
Source height = 1.41 m
Barrier height for grazing incidence------------------------------------Source ! Receiver ! Barrier ! Elevation ofHeight (m) ! Height (m) ! Height (m) ! Barrier Top (m)------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.41 ! 4.50 ! 4.40 ! 4.40
ROAD (44.96 + 40.87 + 0.00) = 46.39 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-90 30 0.57 69.43 0.00 -16.17 -2.74 0.00 -5.57 0.00 44.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 90 0.57 69.43 0.00 -16.17 -6.83 0.00 -5.57 0.00 40.87 30 90 0.15 69.43 0.00 -11.85 -5.40 0.00 0.00 -11.19 40.99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 46.39 dBA
Results segment # 3: Dixie (day)--------------------------------
Source height = 1.20 m
ROAD (0.00 + 65.15 + 0.00) = 65.15 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-90 0 0.00 69.62 0.00 -1.46 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.15 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 65.15 dBA
Results segment # 4: Dixie (day)--------------------------------
Source height = 1.20 m
ROAD (0.00 + 63.06 + 0.00) = 63.06 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-90 0 0.00 69.62 0.00 -3.55 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 63.06 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 67.53 dBA
Results segment # 1: Queensway (night)--------------------------------------
Source height = 1.41 m
Barrier height for grazing incidence------------------------------------Source ! Receiver ! Barrier ! Elevation ofHeight (m) ! Height (m) ! Height (m) ! Barrier Top (m)------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.41 ! 10.50 ! 10.16 ! 10.16
ROAD (41.59 + 37.82 + 0.00) = 43.11 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-90 30 0.39 57.37 0.00 -13.29 -2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 90 0.00 57.37 0.00 -9.54 -4.77 0.00 0.00 -0.13 42.92* 30 90 0.39 57.37 0.00 -13.29 -6.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Bright Zone !
Segment Leq : 43.11 dBA
Results segment # 2: Queensway (night)--------------------------------------
Source height = 1.41 m
Barrier height for grazing incidence------------------------------------Source ! Receiver ! Barrier ! Elevation ofHeight (m) ! Height (m) ! Height (m) ! Barrier Top (m)------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.41 ! 10.50 ! 10.22 ! 10.22
ROAD (40.56 + 36.79 + 0.00) = 42.08 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-90 30 0.39 57.37 0.00 -14.32 -2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 90 0.00 57.37 0.00 -10.28 -4.77 0.00 0.00 -0.13 42.19* 30 90 0.39 57.37 0.00 -14.32 -6.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.79----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Bright Zone !
Segment Leq : 42.08 dBA
Results segment # 3: Dixie (night)----------------------------------
Source height = 1.21 m
ROAD (0.00 + 57.56 + 0.00) = 57.56 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-90 0 0.00 62.03 0.00 -1.46 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 57.56 dBA
Results segment # 4: Dixie (night)----------------------------------
Source height = 1.21 m
ROAD (0.00 + 55.47 + 0.00) = 55.47 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-90 0 0.00 62.03 0.00 -3.55 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 55.47 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 59.82 dBA
TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 67.53(NIGHT): 59.82
Appendix C
Supportive Drawings
A-2
ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS, DETAILS
21 21
12
BLOCK REDBRICK COLOR:
12
9.27.7.1. Materials
9.27.7. Wood Shingles and Shakes
A-2
7
NATURAL INDIANA LIMESTONE
STONE COLOUR:
BLOCK
FRONT (WEST) ELEVATION
12
47
128
128
12
47
LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4
39.66
' (12.0
9M)
9'-0"
(2.74
)
9'-11
" (3.0
2)
LEVELGROUNDFINISHED
112.45
SECOND FLOOR
9'-5"
(2.87
)
8'-6"
(2.59
M)
(0.28
)
TOP OF
11"
U/S OF FLAT CLG.
THIRD FLOOR
FOURTH FLOOR
9'-0"
(2.74
)
11'-3
" (3.4
3)
8'-6"
(2.59
)
9'-5"
(2.87
)
TOP OF
(0.28
)
11"
(0.28
)
TOP OF
11"
(0.69
)2'-
3"
A-27
9.10.1.2. Sloped Roofs
A-28
12
47
Fountain HillConstruction &Consulting Ltd.
4-UNIT TOWNHOMES
A-21
12
47
12
47
REAR (EAST) ELEVATIONA-22
LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4
1412 12
14
SIDE (SOUTH) ELEVATIONA-23
PROP
ERTY
LIN
E
A-2
6
A-2
6
2121
12 12
A-2
7
141212
14
SIDE (NORTH) ELEVATIONA-24
PROP
ERTY
LIN
E
LANEWAY
SECOND FLOOR
8'-0 " [2.46 M]
LANDSCAPED AREA
PROP
ERTY
LINE
TOP OF FLAT ROOF
TOP OF THIRD FLOOR
FLOOR HEIGHTS OFBUILDING :
MIDDLE OF THE ROOF
TOP OFSECONDFLOOR:
TOP OF FOURTH FLOOR
FOURTH FLOOR
112.45
95.47TOP OF SECOND FLOOR
TOP OF FIRST FLOOR
11'-3
"9'-
5"9'-
11"
9'-5"
1R
TOP OFFIRSTFLOOR :
FIRST FLOOR
THIRD FLOOR
TOP OF WOOD DECK
ELEVATION @GARAGE DOOR
ACTU
AL B
UILD
ING
HEIG
HT =
39.66
' [12.0
9 M]
(FRO
M TH
E TO
P OF
THE
EST
ABLIS
HED
AVER
AGE
GRAD
E TO
THE
TOP
OF
THE
FLAT
ROO
F )
BUILD
ING
HEIG
HT =
34.30
' [10.4
6 M]
(FRO
M TH
E ES
TABL
ISHE
D AV
ERAG
E GR
ADE
TO T
HE M
ID-P
OINT
OF
THE
FLAT
ROO
F)
20'-0" [6.10 M]
55'-0"[16.77 M]
45'-0" [13.72 M]
TOP OFESTABLISHED AVG.GRADE OF BUILDING
8'-6"
[2.59
M]
11" [
0.28 M
]
2'-3"
9'-0"
12
21
12
21
6'-0"
[1.83
M]
GARAGE
10'-0" (3.05M)
BUILDING SECTIONA-25
PROP
ERTY
LIN
E
LANEWAY
SECOND FLOOR
8'-0 " [2.44 M]
LANDSCAPED AREA
PROP
ERTY
LINE
TOP OF FLAT ROOF
TOP OF THIRD FLOOR
FLOOR HEIGHTS OFBLOCKS A :
MIDDLE OF THE ROOF
TOP OFSECONDFLOOR:
TOP OF FOURTH FLOOR
FOURTH FLOOR
112.45
95.47 TOP OF SECOND FLOOR
TOP OF FIRST FLOOR
11'-3
"9'-
5"9'-
11"
9'-5"
1R
TOP OFFIRSTFLOOR :
FIRST FLOOR
THIRD FLOOR
TOP OF WOOD DECK
ELEVATION @GARAGE DOOR
ACTU
AL B
UILD
ING
HEIG
HT =
39.66
' [12.0
9 M]
(FRO
M TH
E TO
P OF
THE
EST
ABLIS
HED
AVER
AGE
GRAD
E TO
THE
TOP
OF
THE
FLAT
ROO
F )
BUILD
ING
HEIG
HT =
34.30
' [10.4
6 M]
(FRO
M TH
E ES
TABL
ISHE
D AV
ERAG
E GR
ADE
TO T
HE M
ID-P
OINT
OF
THE
FLAT
ROO
F)
20'-0" [6.10 M]
55'-0"[16.77 M]
45'-0" [13.72 M]
TOP OFESTABLISHED AVG.GRADE OF BUILDING8'-
6" [2
.59 M
]11
" [0.2
8 M]
2'-3"
9'-0"
12
21
12
21
GARAGE
10'-0" (3.05M)
BUILDING SECTION AT STAIRSA-26
PROP
ERTY
LIN
E
15R
17R
15R
501 50 1
501 50 1
1.23
0.60
112.30112.30
112.10 112.04
(FRO
M TH
E A
VERA
GE G
RADE
TO
THE
TOP
OF T
HE F
LAT
ROOF
)
(FRO
M TH
E AV
ERAG
E GR
ADE
TO M
ID-P
OINT
OF
THE
FLAT
ROO
F)
112.56BUILDINGGRADE OFAVERAGETOP OF
5" [0
.11 M
]39
.66' (1
2.09M
)
9'-0"
(2.74
)
9'-11
" (3.0
2)
LEVELFIRST FL.FINISHED
112.45
SECOND FLOOR
9'-5"
(2.87
)
8'-6"
(2.59
M)
(0.28
)
TOP OF
11"
U/S OF
TOP OF FLAT ROOF
FLAT CLG.
THIRD FLOOR
FOURTH FLOOR
9'-0"
(2.74
)
11'-3
" (3.4
3)
8'-6"
(2.59
)
9'-5"
(2.87
)
TOP OF
(0.28
)
11"
(0.28
)
TOP OF
11"
(0.69
)2'-
3"
(FRO
M TH
E A
VERA
GE G
RADE
TO
THE
TOP
OF T
HE F
LAT
ROOF
)
(FRO
M TH
E AV
ERAG
E GR
ADE
TO M
ID-P
OINT
OF
THE
FLAT
ROO
F)
112.56BUILDINGGRADE OFAVERAGETOP OF
5" [0
.11 M
]
112.56
7'-1"
9'-1"
112.56
15'-2"
A- 3
FLOOR BLOCK PLANS
Fountain HillConstruction &Consulting Ltd.
4-UNIT TOWNHOMES
1ST 2 3 4ND RD TH- - - --
FD.
FURNACE
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY ABOVE
FOYER
PLANTER BOX
UP 15R
12'0"x7'0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR
H.W.T.
DN 1R
MECH.
BOUILDING ABOVE
2 CARGARAGE
RAILI
NG
10'-112"
15'-0"
4'-0" 11'-0"
WAS
TE S
TORA
GE A
REA
DEN
15'-0"
STORAGEUNDERSTAIRS
CUT
DOOR
TO
FIT
FD.
FURNACE
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY ABOVE
FOYER
PLANTER BOX
UP 15R
12'0"x7'0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR
H.W.T.
DN 1R
MECH.
BOUILDING ABOVE
2 CARGARAGE
RAILI
NG
10'-112"
15'-5
1 2"
15'-6"
4'-0"11'-6"
45'-0
"
WAS
TE S
TORA
GE A
REA
WR
DEN
15'-6"
10'-0
"
55'-0
"
39'-6
1 2"
UNDERSTORAGE
STAIRS
CUT
DOOR
TO
FIT
14'-3
"14
'-3"
16'-6
"
1'-412"
FD.
FURNACE
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY ABOVE
FOYER
PLANTER BOX
UP 15R
12'0"x7'0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR
H.W.T.
DN 1R
MECH.
BOUILDING ABOVE
2 CARGARAGE
RAILI
NG
10'-112"
15'-5
1 2"
15'-6"
4'-0" 11'-6"
45'-0
"
WAS
TE S
TORA
GE A
REA
WR
DEN
15'-6"
10'-0
"
55'-0
"
39'-6
1 2"
UNDERSTORAGE
STAIRS
CUT
DOOR
TO
FIT
14'-3
"14
'-3"
16'-6
"
1'-412"
FD.
FURNACE
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY ABOVE
FOYER
PLANTER BOX
UP 15R
12'0"x7'0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR
H.W.T.
DN 1R
MECH.
BOUILDING ABOVE
2 CARGARAGE
RAILI
NG
10'-112"
15'-0"
4'-0"11'-0"
WAS
TE S
TORA
GE A
REA
WR
DEN
15'-0"
STORAGEUNDERSTAIRS
CUT
DOOR
TO
FIT
FLOOR BLOCK PLAN3RD--
FLOOR BLOCK PLAN1ST-- FLOOR BLOCK PLAN2ND
--
DN 15R
13'6"x14'2"
DINING ROOM
14'-2"
10'8"x14'0"
15'0"x10'0"
A/C
DECK
KITCHEN/BREAKFAST
10'-0
"
FLUSH REAKFAST BAR
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY
OPT.
GAS
FIRE
PLAC
E
LOW WALL
15'2"x14'2"LIVING ROOM
UP 17
R
DW
RAILI
NG
S
6'0" H
IGH
PRIV
ACY
FENC
E
6'0" H
IGH
PRIV
ACY
FENC
E
15'-0"
4'-0"11'-0"
15'-0"
13'-6
"
29'-1
1 2"RE
F.PA
NTRY
LOT 2
3'-6"10'-8"
15'-0"
DN 15R
13'6"x14'2"
DINING ROOM
14'-2"
10'8"x14'0"
15'0"x10'0"
A/C
DECK
KITCHEN/BREAKFAST
10'-0
"
FLUSH REAKFAST BAR
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY
OPT.
GAS
FIRE
PLAC
E
LOW WALL
15'2"x14'2"LIVING ROOM
UP 17
RDW
RAILI
NG
S6'0
" HIG
H PR
IVAC
Y FE
NCE
6'0" H
IGH
PRIV
ACY
FENC
E
15'-0"
4'-0" 11'-0"
15'-0"
13'-6
"
29'-1
1 2"RE
F.PA
NTRY
LOT 1
3'-6" 10'-8"
15'-0"
DN 15R
13'6"x14'2"
DINING ROOM
14'-2"
12'0"x14'0"
15'6"x10'0"
A/C
DECK
KITCHEN/BREAKFAST
FLUSH REAKFAST BAR
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY
OPT.
GAS
FIRE
PLAC
E
LOW WALL
15'2"x14'2"LIVING ROOM
UP 17
R
DW
RAILI
NG
S
6'0" H
IGH
PRIV
ACY
FENC
E
6'0" H
IGH
PRIV
ACY
FENC
E
15'-6"
4'-0" 11'-6"
15'-6"13
'-6"
29'-1
1 2"
REF.
PANT
RY
14'-3
"16
'-6"
14'-3
"
1'-412"
3'-6" 12'-0 1/2"
DN 15R
13'6"x14'2"
DINING ROOM
14'-2"
12'0"x14'0"
15'6"x10'0"
A/C
DECK
KITCHEN/BREAKFAST
FLUSH REAKFAST BAR
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY
OPT.
GAS
FIRE
PLAC
E
LOW WALL
15'2"x14'2"LIVING ROOM
UP 17
R
DW
RAILI
NG
S
6'0" H
IGH
PRIV
ACY
FENC
E
6'0" H
IGH
PRIV
ACY
FENC
E
15'-6"
4'-0"11'-6"
15'-6"
13'-6
"
29'-1
1 2"
10'-0
"
REF.
PANT
RY
14'-3
"16
'-6"
14'-3
"
1'-412"
3'-6"12'-0 1/2"
LOT 3 LOT 4LOT 2LOT 1 LOT 3 LOT 4
45'-0
"
55'-0
"
45'-0
"10
'-0"
55'-0
"
FLOOR BLOCK PLAN4 TH-- ROOF BLOCK PLAN--
14'-2"
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY BELOW
DN 17
R
LINE OF BALCONY ABOVE
13'2"x14'2"
LINE OF WALLABOVE
BEDROOM
BEDROOM14'2"x13'2"(12'2")
14'-2"
13'-2
"
12'-2
"
UP 15R
RAILI
NG
HALL
15'-0"
4'-0"11'-0"
15'-0"
#2
#313
'-2"
CL
CL
W/D
T
32"X24"LINEN/
PANTRY
BATH
30"X72" TUB
LAUNDRY
3'-6"3'-10 1/2"6'-5"
3'-6"
14'-2"
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY BELOW
DN 17
R
LINE OF BALCONY ABOVE
13'2"x14'2"
LINE OF WALLABOVE
BEDROOM
BEDROOM14'2"x13'2"(12'2")
14'-2"
13'-2
"
12'-2
"
UP 15R
RAILI
NG
HALL
15'-6"
4'-0"11'-6"
45'-0
"
15'-6"
#2
#3
13'-2
"
BATH
14'-3
"16
'-6"
14'-3
"
1'-412"
3'-6"3'-10 1/2"
3'-6"
16'-1012"
12"
14'-2"
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY BELOW
DN 17
R
LINE OF BALCONY ABOVE
13'2"x14'2"
LINE OF WALLABOVE
BEDROOM
BEDROOM14'2"x13'2"(12'2")
14'-2"
13'-2
"
12'-2
"
UP 15R
RAILI
NG
HALL
15'-6"
4'-0" 11'-6"
45'-0
"
15'-6"
#2
#3
13'-2
"
BATH
14'-3
"16
'-6"
14'-3
"
1'-412"
3'-6" 3'-10 1/2" 7'-8 1/2"
3'-6"
16'-1012"
12"
14'-2"
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY BELOW
DN 17
R
LINE OF BALCONY ABOVE
13'2"x14'2"
LINE OF WALLABOVE
BEDROOM
BEDROOM14'2"x13'2"(12'2")
14'-2"
13'-2
"
12'-2
"
UP 15R
RAILI
NGHALL
15'-0"
4'-0" 11'-0"
15'-0"
#2
#3
13'-2
"
CL
CL
W/D
T
32"X24"LINEN/
PANTRY
BATH
30"X72" TUB
LAUNDRY
3'-6" 3'-10 1/2" 6'-5"
3'-6"
LOT 2LOT 1 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 2LOT 1 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 2LOT 1 LOT 3 LOT 4
SLOP
ESL
OPE
SLOP
ESL
OPE
15'-0"
SLOP
ESL
OPE
15'-0"
SLOP
ESL
OPE
SCALE 1/8"=1'-0"A-33
SCALE 1/8"=1'-0"A-34
SCALE 1/8"=1'-0"A-31
SCALE 1/8"=1'-0"A-32
SCALE 1/8"=1'-0"A-35
15'-6" 15'-6"
15'-6"15'-6"
F.F.112.45F.F.112.45
112.30 112.30
112.30DN 1R
112.30DN 1R
112.30DN 1R
112.30DN 1R
F.F.112.45F.F.112.45
PLANTER BOX
PLAN
TER
BOX
112.10 112.10 112.10 112.10
AVERAGE GRADE OF THE BUILDING: 112.56(AS PER GRADING CALCULATION)
112.2
5
112.2
5
61'-0" (18.59m)
VISITOR PARKING
113.20 113.20 113.20 113.20
SLOP
E 1.
7%
SLOP
E 1.
7%
SLOP
E 1.
7%
SLOP
E 1.
7%
LINE OF WALL BELOW
14'2"x24'3"
24'-3
"
DN 15R
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
LINE OFWALL BELOW
LINE OFROOF ABOVEBALCONY
MASTER BEDROOM
14'-2"
72" V
ANIT
Y
ENSUITE
15'-2
"
42" H
IGH
KNEE
WAL
L
RAILI
NG
6'-4"
#1
SITTING AREA
W.I.C.
6'-6"
9'-1"
10'-6
"
GLASSSHOWER
W.I.C.
6'-6"
15'-6"
9'-2"
15'-6"
LINE OF WALL BELOW
14'2"x24'3"
24'-3
"
DN 15R
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
LINE OFWALL BELOW
LINE OFROOF ABOVEBALCONY
MASTER BEDROOM
14'-2"
72" V
ANIT
Y
ENSUITE
15'-2
"
42" H
IGH
KNEE
WAL
L
RAILI
NG
6'-4"
#1
SITTING AREA
W.I.C.
6'-6"
9'-1"
10'-6
"
15'-0"
8'-8"
15'-0"
GLASSSHOWER
W.I.C.
6'-6"
14'-3
"16
'-6"
14'-3
"
1'-0"
45'-0
" 42'-3
"
LINE OF WALL BELOW
14'2"x24'3"
24'-3
"
DN 15R
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
LINE OFWALL BELOW
LINE OFROOF ABOVE BALCONY
MASTER BEDROOM
14'-2"
72" V
ANIT
Y
ENSUITE
15'-2
"
42" H
IGH
KNEE
WAL
L
RAILI
NG
6'-4"
#1
SITTING AREA
W.I.C.
6'-6"
9'-1"
10'-6
"
15'-0"
8'-8"
15'-0"
GLASSSHOWER
W.I.C.
6'-6"
LINE OF WALL BELOW
14'2"x24'3"
24'-3
"
DN 15R
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
LINE OFWALL BELOW
LINE OFROOF ABOVE BALCONY
MASTER BEDROOM
14'-2"
72" V
ANIT
Y
ENSUITE
15'-2
"
42" H
IGH
KNEE
WAL
L
RAILI
NG
6'-4"
#1
SITTING AREA
W.I.C.
6'-6"
9'-1"
10'-6
"
GLASSSHOWER
W.I.C.
6'-6"
15'-6"
9'-2"
15'-6"
14'-3
"16
'-6"
14'-3
"
1'-0"
45'-0
"42'-3
"
BENCH BENCH BENCH BENCH
CL
9'5"x7'9"
CL
9'5"x7'9"
CL
9'5"x7'9"
CL
9'5"x7'9"
WR
36"x
50"
OPT.
ISLA
ND
PANT
RYPA
NTRY
24"x
60"
KITC
HEN
CABI
NET
C/W
LOW
ER D
OORS
36"x
50"
OPT.
ISLA
ND
PANT
RYPA
NTRY
24"x
60"
KITC
HEN
CABI
NET
C/W
LOW
ER D
OORS
36"x
50"
OPT.
ISLA
ND
PANT
RYPA
NTRY
24"x
60"
KITC
HEN
CABI
NET
C/W
LOW
ER D
OORS
36"x
50"
OPT.
ISLA
ND
PANT
RYPA
NTRY
24"x
60"
KITC
HEN
CABI
NET
C/W
LOW
ER D
OORS
CL
CL
W/DT
32"X24"LINEN/
PANTRY
BATH
LAUNDRY
5'-6"
CL
CL
W/DT
32"X24"LINEN/
PANTRY
BATH
LAUNDRY
5'-6"
5'-91 2"
5'-91 2"
7'-8 1/2"7'-8 1/2"
14'-3
"16
'-6"
14'-3
"
1'-0"
45'-0
"
LINE OF WALL BELOW
14'2"x24'3"
24'-3
"
DN 15R
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
LINE OFWALL BELOW
LINE OFROOF ABOVEBALCONY
MASTER BEDROOM
14'-2"
72" V
ANIT
Y
ENSUITE
15'-2
"
42" H
IGH
KNEE
WAL
L
RAILI
NG
43'-3
"
6'-4"
#1
SITTING AREA
W.I.C.
6'-6"
9'-1"
10'-6
"
15'-0"
42'-3
"
8'-8"
15'-0"
GLASSSHOWER
W.I.C.
6'-6"
1'-0"
45'-0
" 42'-3
"
A-4
TYPICAL FLOOR PLANS
Fountain HillConstruction &Consulting Ltd.
4-UNIT TOWNHOMES
14'-2"
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY BELOW
DN 15R
13'6"x14'2"
FD.
FURNACE
DINING ROOM
AMANDAFIRST FLOOR PLAN
14'-2"
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY ABOVE
FOYER
PLANTER BOX
DN 17
R
LINE OF BALCONY ABOVE
13'2"x14'2"
LINE OF WALLABOVE
BEDROOM
BEDROOM14'2"x13'2"(12'2")
14'-2"
13'-2
"
12'-2
"
UP 15R
10'8"x14'0"
15'0"x10'0"
A/C
UP 15R
12'0"x7'0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR
H.W.T.
DECK
DN 1R
KITCHEN/BREAKFAST
10'-0
"
MECH.
BOUILDING ABOVE
2 CARGARAGE
FLUSH REAKFAST BAR
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY
SECOND FLOOR PLAN FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
RAILI
NG
HALL
OPT.
GAS
FIRE
PLAC
E
LOW WALL
15'2"x14'2"LIVING ROOM
UP 17
R
DW
RAILI
NG
RAILI
NG
10'-112"
S
6'0" H
IGH
PRIV
ACY
FENC
E
15'-5
1 2"
6'0" H
IGH
PRIV
ACY
FENC
E
15'-0"
54'-0
"
4'-0"11'-0"
45'-0
"
1'-0"
15'-0"
44'-0
"
4'-0"11'-0"
45'-0
"
1'-0"
15'-0"
44'-0
"
4'-0"11'-0"
45'-0
"
1'-0"
TOTAL GFA = 258 S.F. TOTAL GFA = 671 S.F. TOTAL GFA = 640 S.F.
15'-0"
WAS
TE S
TORA
GE A
REA
13'-6
"
14'-1
11 2"
CL
29'-1
1 2"
WR
15'-0"
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
#2
#3
SLOP
ESL
OPE
ROOF PLAN
15'-0"
9'5"x7'9"DEN
15'-0"
TOTAL GFA = 671 S.F.
AMANDA
13'-2
"
CL
CL
W/D
T
32"X24"LINEN/
PANTRY
BATH
30"X72" TUB
LAUNDRY
10'-0
"
REF.
15'-5
1 2"14
'-7"
PANT
RY
10'-0
"
55'-0
"
39'-6
1 2"
STORAGEUNDERSTAIRS
CUT
DOOR
TO
FIT
14'-2"
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY BELOW
DN 15R
13'6"x14'2"
FD.
FURNACE
DINING ROOM
KRISTENFIRST FLOOR PLAN
14'-2"
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY ABOVE
FOYER
PLANTER BOX
DN 17
R
LINE OF BALCONY ABOVE
13'2"x14'2"
LINE OF WALLABOVE
BEDROOM
BEDROOM14'2"x13'2"(12'2")
14'-2"
13'-2
"
12'-2
"
UP 15R
12'0"x14'0"
15'6"x10'0"
A/C
UP 15R
12'0"x7'0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR
H.W.T.
DECK
DN 1R
KITCHEN/BREAKFAST
MECH.
BOUILDING ABOVE
2 CARGARAGE
FLUSH REAKFAST BAR
CEDAR SHAKECANOPY
SECOND FLOOR PLAN FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
RAILI
NG
HALL
OPT.
GAS
FIRE
PLAC
E
LOW WALL
15'2"x14'2"LIVING ROOM
UP 17
R
DW
RAILI
NG
RAILI
NG
10'-112"
S
6'0" H
IGH
PRIV
ACY
FENC
E
15'-5
1 2"
6'0" H
IGH
PRIV
ACY
FENC
E
15'-6"
54'-0
"
4'-0"11'-6"
45'-0
"
1'-0"
15'-6"
44'-0
"
4'-0"11'-6"
45'-0
"
1'-0"
15'-6"
44'-0
"
4'-0"11'-6"
45'-0
"
1'-0"
TOTAL GFA = 250 S.F. TOTAL GFA = 716.20 S.F. TOTAL GFA = 659.60 S.F.
36"x
50"
OPT.
ISLA
ND
15'-6"
WAS
TE S
TORA
GE A
REA
13'-6
"
14'-1
11 2"
29'-1
1 2"
WR
15'-6"
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
#2
#3
SLOP
ESL
OPE
ROOF PLAN
15'-0"
DEN
15'-6"
TOTAL GFA = 716.20 S.F.
KRISTEN
13'-2
"
CL
CL
W/DT
32"X24"LINEN/
PANTRY
BATH
LAUNDRY
10'-0
"
REF.
15'-5
1 2"14
'-7"
PANT
RY
10'-0
"
55'-0
"
39'-6
1 2"
UNDERSTORAGE
STAIRS
CUT
DOOR
TO
FIT
Fountain HillConstruction &
4-UNIT TOWNHOMES
Consulting Ltd.
Fountain Hill
Consulting Ltd.Construction &
4-UNIT TOWNHOMES
14'-3
"14
'-3"
16'-6
"
14'-3
"16
'-6"
14'-3
"
14'-3
"16
'-6"
14'-3
"
1'-412" 1'-41
2" 1'-412"
3'-6"3'-10 1/2"6'-5"
3'-6"
3'-6"10'-8"
3'-6"3'-10 1/2"7'-8 1/2"
3'-6"
16'-1012"
12"
3'-6"12'-0 1/2"
42'-3
"1'-
0"
LINE OF WALL BELOW
14'2"x24'3"
24'-3
"
DN 15R
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
LINE OFWALL BELOW
LINE OFROOF ABOVEBALCONY
MASTER BEDROOM
14'-2"
72" V
ANIT
Y
ENSUITE
15'-2
"
42" H
IGH
KNEE
WAL
L
RAILI
NG
43'-3
"
6'-4"
#1
SITTING AREA
W.I.C.
6'-6"
9'-1"
10'-6
"
GLASSSHOWER
W.I.C.
6'-6"
15'-6"
9'-2"
15'-6"
BENCH
BENCH
AMANDA AMANDA AMANDA AMANDA
KRISTEN KRISTEN KRISTEN KRISTEN
CL
9'5"x7'9"
PANT
RYPA
NTRY
24"x
60"
KITC
HEN
CABI
NET
C/W
LOW
ER D
OORS
36"x
50"
OPT.
ISLA
ND
PANT
RYPA
NTRY
24"x
60"
KITC
HEN
CABI
NET
C/W
LOW
ER D
OORS
5'-6"
5'-91 2"
top related