Noise Feasibility Study

Proposed Residential Development

2207 Dixie Road

Mississauga, Ontario

Prepared for:

Fountain Hill Construction and Consulting Ltd.

200 Ronson Drive, Suite 101 Etobicoke, ON M9W 5Z9

Prepared by

Harry Cai, BEng, EIT

Reviewed by

Sheeba Paul, MEng, PEng

November 6, 2019

HGC Project No: 01900470

Table of Contents

1 Introduction and Summary .......................................................................................................1

2 Site Description and Noise Sources..........................................................................................2

3 Noise Level Criteria ..................................................................................................................3

3.1 Road Traffic Noise ............................................................................................................3

4 Traffic Sound Level Assessment ..............................................................................................5

4.1 Road Traffic Data ..............................................................................................................5

4.2 Road Traffic Noise Predictions .........................................................................................5

5 Discussions and Recommendations..........................................................................................7

5.1 Outdoor Living Areas........................................................................................................7

5.2 Indoor Living Areas and Ventilation Requirements .........................................................7

5.3 Building Façade Constructions .........................................................................................7

6 Warning Clauses .......................................................................................................................9

7 Summary and Recommendations ...........................................................................................10

7.1 Implementation................................................................................................................10

Figure 1: Key Plan

Figure 2: Proposed Plan Showing Prediction Locations

Figure 3: Proposed Plan Showing Ventilation Requirements

Appendix A: Road Traffic Information

Appendix B: Sample STAMSON 5.04 Output

Appendix C: Supportive Drawings

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 1 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019

1 Introduction and Summary

HGC Engineering was retained by Fountain Hill Construction and Consulting Ltd. to conduct a noise

feasibility study for a proposed residential development located at 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga,

Region of Peel, Ontario. Lands surrounding the subject site are predominantly residential. The

residential development will consist of one block of 4 townhouse units including a deck over the

laneway at the rear. The study is required by the City of Mississauga and Region of Peel as part of

the planning and approvals process.

The primary sources of noise were determined to be road traffic from Dixie Road and The

Queensway. Road traffic data was obtained from the Region of Peel for both Dixie Road and The

Queensway. The predicted sound levels were compared to the guidelines of the Ministry of

Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP), the Region of Peel and the City of Mississauga to

develop noise control recommendations.

The results of the study indicate that the future daytime and nighttime sound levels of all facades

with exposure to Dixie Road will exceed MECP guidelines and will require noise control measures.

Central air conditioning units are required for all 4 residential units, and upgraded building

components are required for the façades facing The Queensway and Dixie Road. Noise warning

clauses are also required for those units to inform future occupants of traffic noise impact and to

address sound level excesses. For the east façade, any building construction meeting the minimum

requirements of the Ontario Building Code will provide sufficient acoustical insulation for indoor

spaces.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 2 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019

2 Site Description and Noise Sources

Figure 1 is a key plan indicating the location of the proposed site. The site is located at the northeast

intersection of Dixie Road and Venta Ave in the City of Mississauga, Ontario. Figure 2 shows the

proposed site plan by Otto Palfy dated August 26, 2019. The proposed development will consist of

one block of 4 townhouse residential units with landscaped area and elevated decks at the rear.

HGC Engineering personnel visited the site on July 25, 2019 to make observations of the acoustical

environment. During the site visit, it was noted that the primary source of noise impacting the site is

road traffic on Dixie Road, with minor impact from traffic on The Queensway. Negligible impact

from road traffic was observed from Venta Ave. The site is currently occupied by a single storey

residential building, which will be demolished for the construction of the proposed townhouse block.

Existing two storey residences surround the site area immediately to the north and east. Areas around

the site area is flat and mostly residential. There are some commercial/medical uses on the west side

of Dixie Road. There are no significant sources of stationary noise within 500 m of the subject site.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 3 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019

3 Noise Level Criteria

3.1 Road Traffic Noise

Guidelines for acceptable levels of road traffic noise impacting residential developments are given in

the MECP publication NPC-300, “Environmental Noise Guideline Stationary and Transportation

Sources – Approval and Planning”, release date October 21, 2013, and are listed in Table I below.

The values in Table I are energy equivalent (average) sound levels [LEQ] in units of A-weighted

decibels [dBA].

Table I: MECP Road Traffic Noise Criteria (dBA)

Area Daytime LEQ (16 hour)

Road

Nighttime LEQ (8 hour)

Road

Outdoor Living Area 55 dBA --

Inside Living/Dining Rooms 45 dBA 45 dBA

Inside Bedrooms 45 dBA 40 dBA

Daytime refers to the period between 07:00 and 23:00. Nighttime refers to the time period between

23:00 and 07:00. The term “Outdoor Living Area” (OLA) is used in reference to an outdoor patio, a

backyard, a terrace, or other area where passive recreation is expected to occur. Small balconies are

not considered OLAs for the purposes of assessment. Terraces greater than 4 m in depth (measured

perpendicular to the building façade) are considered to be OLAs.

The guidelines in the MECP publication allow the daytime sound levels in an Outdoor Living Area

to be exceeded by up to 5 dBA, without mitigation, if warning clauses are placed in the purchase and

rental agreements to the property. Where OLA sound levels exceed 60 dBA, physical mitigation is

required to reduce the OLA sound level to below 60 dBA and as close to 55 dBA as technically,

economically, and administratively practical. The maximum acoustic fence height in the Region of

Peel is 2.0 m with a maximum combined berm and fence height of 4 m, and fence heights up to

2.4 m have been considered in the past. In the case that the guideline criterion of 55 dBA cannot be

met, it must be demonstrated to the Region of Peel that it is not technically feasible to meet the

55 dBA criterion with a warning clause. The City of Mississauga allows up to a 5 dBA excess from

the MECP guideline criteria for OLA sound levels if tenants and purchasers are notified by

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 4 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019

appropriate warning clauses, and road noise necessitating central air conditioning or provisions for

central air conditioning will also require notices stipulated by the MECP guideline.

A central air conditioning system as an alternative means of ventilation to open windows is required

for dwellings where nighttime sound levels outside bedroom or living/dining room windows exceed

60 dBA (60 dBA or greater for the Region of Peel) or daytime sound levels outside bedroom or

living/dining room windows exceed 65 dBA. Forced-air ventilation with ducts sized to accommodate

the future installation of air conditioning is required when nighttime sound levels at bedroom or

living/dining room windows are in the range of 51 to 59 dBA or when daytime sound levels at

bedroom or living/dining room windows are in the range of 56 to 65 dBA.

Building components such as walls, windows and doors must be designed to achieve indoor sound

level criteria when the plane of window nighttime sound level is greater than 60 dBA (60 dBA or

greater for the Region of Peel) or the daytime sound level is greater than 65 dBA due to road traffic

noise.

Warning clauses to notify future residents of possible noise excesses are also required when

nighttime sound levels exceed 50 dBA at the plane of the bedroom or living/dining room window

and daytime sound levels exceed 55 dBA in the outdoor living area and at the plane of the bedroom

or living/dining room window due to road traffic.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 5 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019

4 Traffic Sound Level Assessment

4.1 Road Traffic Data

Traffic data for Dixie Road was obtained from the Region of Peel in the form of ultimate AADT

traffic values, and is provided in Appendix A. An ultimate volume of 48 600 vehicles per day at a

posted speed limit of 60 km/h was applied for the analysis. A commercial vehicle percentage of 3.3%

for medium trucks and 2.1% for heavy trucks was applied. A day/night split of 92%/8% was used as

provided in the data.

Traffic data for The Queensway was obtained from the Region of Peel in the form of ultimate AADT

traffic values, and is provided in Appendix A. An ultimate volume of 32 400 vehicles per day at a

posted speed limit of 60 km/h was applied for the analysis. A commercial vehicle percentage of 3.4%

for medium trucks and 3.9% for heavy trucks was applied. A day/night split of 97%/3% was used as

provided in the data. Table II summarizes the traffic volume data used in this study.

Table II: Ultimate Road Traffic Data

Road Name Cars Medium

Trucks

Heavy

Trucks Total

Dixie Road

Daytime 42 298 1 475 939 44 712

Nighttime 3 678 128 82 3 888

Total 45 976 1 604 1 021 48 600

The Queensway

Daytime 29 134 1 069 1 226 31 428

Nighttime 901 33 38 972

Total 30 035 1 102 1 264 32 400

4.2 Road Traffic Noise Predictions

To assess the levels of road traffic noise which will impact the study area in the future, sound level

predictions were made using STAMSON version 5.04, a computer algorithm developed by the

MECP. Sample STAMSON output is included in Appendix B.

Predictions of the traffic sound levels were chosen around the proposed residential building to obtain

an appropriate representation of future sound levels at various façades. Sound levels were predicted

at the plane of the 4th storey bedroom and/or living/dining room windows during daytime and

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 6 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019

nighttime hours to investigate ventilation and façade construction requirements. Figure 2 shows the

concept plan of the site with prediction locations. The results of these predictions are summarized in

Table III.

Table III: Predicted Road Traffic Sound Levels [dBA], Without Mitigation

Prediction

Location Description

Daytime

– in the

OLA

LEQ-16 hr

Daytime

– at the

Façade

LEQ-16 hr

Nighttime

– at the

Facade

LEQ-8 hr

A Façade facing Queensway -- 68 60

B Façade facing Dixie Rd -- 71 63

C Façade facing Venta Ave -- 67 59

D Façade facing deck -- 55 <50

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 7 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019

5 Discussions and Recommendations

The sound level predictions indicate that the future traffic sound levels at the facades with direct or

flanking exposure to Dixie Road and The Queensway are above the MECP guideline criteria. The

following discussion outlines the recommendations for acoustic barrier requirements, ventilation

requirements, upgraded building façade construction, and warning clauses to achieve the noise

criteria stated in Table I.

5.1 Outdoor Living Areas

The dwelling units in the proposed residential building have elevated decks at the rear that are less

than 4 m in depth. These areas are not considered to be outdoor living areas under MECP guidelines,

and therefore are exempt from traffic noise assessment.

There are no other common outdoor amenity areas indicated on the site plan.

5.2 Indoor Living Areas and Ventilation Requirements

Air Conditioning

The predicted future sound levels outside the 4th storey window with direct or flanking exposure to

Dixie Road are greater than 65 dBA during daytime hours and/or 59 dBA during nighttime hours. To

address these excesses, all 4 townhouses units are required to be equipped with central air

conditioning systems so that windows may remain closed. These townhouse units are shown in

Figure 3. Window or through-the-wall air conditioning units are not recommended because of the

noise they produce and because the units penetrate through the exterior wall which degrades the

overall sound insulating properties of the envelope. The location, installation and sound ratings of the

outdoor air conditioning devices should minimize noise impacts and comply with criteria of MECP

publication NPC-300, as applicable.

5.3 Building Façade Constructions

The predicted sound levels at the façades with exposure Dixie Road will exceed 65 dBA during

daytime and/or 60 dBA during nighttime. MECP guidelines stipulate that in such cases, building

components including windows, walls, and doors be designed so that the indoor sound levels comply

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 8 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019

with the noise criteria in Table I.

The required building components are selected based on the Acoustical Insulation Factor (AIF) value

for road traffic. Calculations were performed to determine the acoustical insulation factors to

maintain indoor sound levels within MECP guidelines. The calculation methods were developed by

the National Research Council (NRC). They are based on the predicted future sound levels at the

building facades, and the area ratios of the facade components (walls, windows and doors) and the

floor area of the adjacent room.

A summary of the Sound Transmission Class (STC) requirements are provided in Table IV based on

the possibility of sound entering the building through windows only since the exterior wall is mainly

brick. Window to floor area ratios and wall to floor area ratios were calculated from the elevation

details dated August 26, 2019, provided in Appendix C, to determine window STC ratings to

mitigate road traffic noise. The window to flor ratios was measured to be 25 % for living/dining

rooms, and ranges from 12 % to 23 % for bedrooms.

Table IV: Minimum STC Requirements

Prediction

Location Description Space

STC Glazing

Requirements

A Façade facing Queensway Living/Dining STC-30

Bedroom STC-30

B Façade facing Dixie Rd Living/Dining STC-30

Bedroom STC-30

C Façade facing Venta Ave Living/Dining STC-30

Bedroom OBC Notes: OBC – Ontario Building Code

The other façade of the proposed residential building, which is facing away from the road traffic

noise source, has predicted sound levels less than or equal to 65 dBA during daytime and less than or

equal to 60 dBA during nighttime. Thus, any exterior wall and double-glazed window construction

meeting the minimum requirements of the Ontario Building Code (OBC) will provide adequate

sound insulation.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 9 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019

6 Warning Clauses

The MECP guidelines recommend that warning clauses be included in the property and tenancy

agreements and offers of purchase and sale for all lots/units with anticipated traffic sound level

excesses. The following noise warning clauses are required for specific dwellings as indicated in

Table V.

Suggested wording for future dwellings with façade sound levels exceeding the MECP criteria for

which building design and air conditioning have been specified is given below.

Type A:

Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the

development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic may

occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels

exceed the Municipality’s and the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks noise

criteria.

Suggest wording for future dwellings which will have central air conditioning units to be installed is

given below.

Type B:

This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow

windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels

are within the sound level limits of the Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment,

Conservation and Parks.

These sample clauses are provided by the MECP as examples, and can be modified by the

Municipality as required.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 10 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019

7 Summary and Recommendations

The following list and Table V summarize the recommendations made in this report. The reader is

referred to Figure 3 and previous sections of the report where these recommendations are applied and

discussed in more detail.

1. Central air conditioning units will be required for the four townhouse units such that windows

may remain closed.

2. Upgraded glazing construction will be required for the façade facing Dixie Road, as indicated

in Table IV and V. Building constructions meeting the minimum requirements of the Ontario

Building Code will provide sufficient acoustical insultation for the remaining façades.

3. The use of warning clauses in the property and tenancy agreements is recommended to

inform future residents of traffic noise issues.

Table V: Summary of Noise Control Requirements and Noise Warning Clauses

Description Acoustic

Barrier

Ventilation

Requirements*

Type of

Warning

Clause

STC Glazing

Requirements

Façade facing Queensway -- Central A/C A, B LR/DR: STC-30

BR: STC-30

Façade facing Dixie Rd -- Central A/C A, B LR/DR: STC-30

BR: STC-30

Façade facing Venta Ave -- Central A/C A, B LR/DR: STC-30

BR: OBC

Façade facing deck -- Central A/C A, B OBC

Notes: * The location, installation and sound rating of the air conditioning condensers must be compliant with MECP

Guideline NPC-300, as applicable.

-- no specific requirement

OBC – Meeting the minimum requirements of the Ontario Building Code

LR/DR: Living Room/Dining Room

BR: Bedroom

7.1 Implementation

To ensure that the noise control recommendations outlined above are properly implemented, it is

recommended that:

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 11 2207 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario November 6, 2019

1. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the Municipality’s building inspector or a

Professional Engineer qualified to perform acoustical engineering services in the Province of

Ontario should certify that the noise control measures have been properly installed, and

constructed.

A-1

SITE PLAN

Fountain HillConstruction &Consulting Ltd.

4-UNIT TOWNHOMES

townhomes4- storey

Lot 2Lot 1

Lot 4Lot 3

AREA MAP

QUEENSWAY EAST

DIX

IE

R

OA

D

SUBJECT SITE

N

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

NO

RT

H

A-1

SITE PLAN

Fountain HillConstruction &Consulting Ltd.

4-UNIT TOWNHOMES

townhomes4- storey

Lot 2Lot 1

Lot 4Lot 3

AREA MAP

QUEENSWAY EAST

DIX

IE

R

OA

D

SUBJECT SITE

N

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

NO

RT

H

Appendix A

Road Traffic Information

Date: July 22, 2019 From: Harry Cai, HGC Engineering Re: Ultimate Traffic Data Request – 2207 Dixie Rd Harry, As per your request, we are providing the following traffic data:

Existing Ultimate

24 Hour Traffic Volume 26,880 48,600

# of Lanes 4 6

Day/Night Split 92/8 92/8

Day Trucks (% of Total Volume)

2.2% Medium 2.1% Heavy

2.2% Medium 2.1% Heavy

Night Trucks (% of Total Volume)

3.3% Medium 2.1% Heavy

3.3% Medium 2.1% Heavy

Right-of-Way Width

45 meters

Posted Speed Limit 60 km/h

Please note:

1. The current volume is not the Annual Average Daily Traffic, but the averaged raw volumes over three data collection days. If you need the Annual Average Traffic Volume, please visit the Peel Open Data website below: http://opendata.peelregion.ca/data-categories/transportation/traffic-count-stations.aspx

2. The ultimate volume is the planned volume during a level of service ‘D’ where a 2 second vehicle headway and a volume to capacity ratio of 0.9 is assumed. Traffic signals and hourly variations in traffic are also incorporated into the ultimate volume.

If you require further assistance, please contact me at (905) 791-7800 ext. 4810 Regards, Viktoriya Zaytseva Transportation Analyst, Transportation System Planning Transportation Division, Public Works, Region of Peel 10 Peel Centre Drive, Suite B, 4th Floor, Brampton, ON, L6T 4B9 E: viktoriya.zaytseva@peelregion.ca • W: 905-791-7800 x4810

Date: July 22, 2019 From: Harry Cai, HGC Engineering Re: Ultimate Traffic Data Request – Queensway at Dixie Rd Harry, As per your request, we are providing the following traffic data:

Existing Ultimate

24 Hour Traffic Volume 32,214 32,400

# of Lanes 4 4

Day/Night Split 97/3 97/3

Day Trucks (% of Total Volume)

2.1% Medium 3.9% Heavy

2.1% Medium 3.9% Heavy

Night Trucks (% of Total Volume)

3.4% Medium 3.2% Heavy

3.4% Medium 3.2% Heavy

Right-of-Way Width

45 meters

Posted Speed Limit 60 km/h

Please note:

1. The current volume is not the Annual Average Daily Traffic, but the averaged raw volumes over three data collection days. If you need the Annual Average Traffic Volume, please visit the Peel Open Data website below: http://opendata.peelregion.ca/data-categories/transportation/traffic-count-stations.aspx

2. The ultimate volume is the planned volume during a level of service ‘D’ where a 2 second vehicle headway and a volume to capacity ratio of 0.9 is assumed. Traffic signals and hourly variations in traffic are also incorporated into the ultimate volume.

If you require further assistance, please contact me at (905) 791-7800 ext. 4810 Regards, Viktoriya Zaytseva Transportation Analyst, Transportation System Planning Transportation Division, Public Works, Region of Peel 10 Peel Centre Drive, Suite B, 4th Floor, Brampton, ON, L6T 4B9 E: viktoriya.zaytseva@peelregion.ca • W: 905-791-7800 x4810

Appendix B

Sample STAMSON 5.04 Output

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 06-11-2019 16:55:01MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT

Filename: a.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hoursDescription: Location A, Facade Facing Queensway

Road data, segment # 1: Queensway (day/night)---------------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 14567/451 veh/TimePeriod *Medium truck volume : 534/17 veh/TimePeriod *Heavy truck volume : 613/19 veh/TimePeriod *Posted speed limit : 60 km/hRoad gradient : 0 %Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)

* Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input:

24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 16200 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 3.40 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 3.90 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 97.00

Data for Segment # 1: Queensway (day/night)-------------------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 135.00 / 135.00 mReceiver height : 10.50 / 10.50 mTopography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier)Barrier angle1 : 30.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 degBarrier height : 7.00 mBarrier receiver distance : 5.00 / 5.00 mSource elevation : 0.00 mReceiver elevation : 0.00 mBarrier elevation : 0.00 mReference angle : 0.00Road data, segment # 2: Queensway (day/night)---------------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 14567/451 veh/TimePeriod *Medium truck volume : 534/17 veh/TimePeriod *Heavy truck volume : 613/19 veh/TimePeriod *Posted speed limit : 60 km/hRoad gradient : 0 %Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)

* Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input:

24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 16200 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 3.40 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 3.90 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 97.00

Data for Segment # 2: Queensway (day/night)-------------------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 3 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 160.00 / 160.00 mReceiver height : 4.50 / 10.50 mTopography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier)Barrier angle1 : 30.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 degBarrier height : 7.00 mBarrier receiver distance : 5.00 / 5.00 mSource elevation : 0.00 mReceiver elevation : 0.00 mBarrier elevation : 0.00 mReference angle : 0.00Road data, segment # 3: Dixie (day/night)-----------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 21149/1839 veh/TimePeriod *Medium truck volume : 738/64 veh/TimePeriod *Heavy truck volume : 469/41 veh/TimePeriod *Posted speed limit : 60 km/hRoad gradient : 0 %Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)

* Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input:

24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 24300 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 3.30 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 2.10 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00

Data for Segment # 3: Dixie (day/night)---------------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 0.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface)Receiver source distance : 21.00 / 21.00 mReceiver height : 10.50 / 10.50 mTopography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)Reference angle : 0.00

Road data, segment # 4: Dixie (day/night)-----------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 21149/1839 veh/TimePeriod *Medium truck volume : 738/64 veh/TimePeriod *Heavy truck volume : 469/41 veh/TimePeriod *Posted speed limit : 60 km/hRoad gradient : 0 %Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)

* Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input:

24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 24300 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 3.30 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 2.10 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00

Data for Segment # 4: Dixie (day/night)---------------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 0.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface)Receiver source distance : 34.00 / 34.00 mReceiver height : 10.50 / 10.50 mTopography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)Reference angle : 0.00Results segment # 1: Queensway (day)------------------------------------

Source height = 1.41 m

Barrier height for grazing incidence------------------------------------Source ! Receiver ! Barrier ! Elevation ofHeight (m) ! Height (m) ! Height (m) ! Barrier Top (m)------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.41 ! 10.50 ! 10.16 ! 10.16

ROAD (53.65 + 49.88 + 0.00) = 55.17 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-90 30 0.39 69.43 0.00 -13.29 -2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 90 0.00 69.43 0.00 -9.54 -4.77 0.00 0.00 -0.13 54.98* 30 90 0.39 69.43 0.00 -13.29 -6.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------

* Bright Zone !

Segment Leq : 55.17 dBA

Results segment # 2: Queensway (day)------------------------------------

Source height = 1.41 m

Barrier height for grazing incidence------------------------------------Source ! Receiver ! Barrier ! Elevation ofHeight (m) ! Height (m) ! Height (m) ! Barrier Top (m)------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.41 ! 4.50 ! 4.40 ! 4.40

ROAD (44.96 + 40.87 + 0.00) = 46.39 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-90 30 0.57 69.43 0.00 -16.17 -2.74 0.00 -5.57 0.00 44.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 90 0.57 69.43 0.00 -16.17 -6.83 0.00 -5.57 0.00 40.87 30 90 0.15 69.43 0.00 -11.85 -5.40 0.00 0.00 -11.19 40.99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Segment Leq : 46.39 dBA

Results segment # 3: Dixie (day)--------------------------------

Source height = 1.20 m

ROAD (0.00 + 65.15 + 0.00) = 65.15 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-90 0 0.00 69.62 0.00 -1.46 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.15 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Segment Leq : 65.15 dBA

Results segment # 4: Dixie (day)--------------------------------

Source height = 1.20 m

ROAD (0.00 + 63.06 + 0.00) = 63.06 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-90 0 0.00 69.62 0.00 -3.55 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 63.06 dBA

Total Leq All Segments: 67.53 dBA

Results segment # 1: Queensway (night)--------------------------------------

Source height = 1.41 m

Barrier height for grazing incidence------------------------------------Source ! Receiver ! Barrier ! Elevation ofHeight (m) ! Height (m) ! Height (m) ! Barrier Top (m)------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.41 ! 10.50 ! 10.16 ! 10.16

ROAD (41.59 + 37.82 + 0.00) = 43.11 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-90 30 0.39 57.37 0.00 -13.29 -2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 90 0.00 57.37 0.00 -9.54 -4.77 0.00 0.00 -0.13 42.92* 30 90 0.39 57.37 0.00 -13.29 -6.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------

* Bright Zone !

Segment Leq : 43.11 dBA

Results segment # 2: Queensway (night)--------------------------------------

Source height = 1.41 m

Barrier height for grazing incidence------------------------------------Source ! Receiver ! Barrier ! Elevation ofHeight (m) ! Height (m) ! Height (m) ! Barrier Top (m)------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.41 ! 10.50 ! 10.22 ! 10.22

ROAD (40.56 + 36.79 + 0.00) = 42.08 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-90 30 0.39 57.37 0.00 -14.32 -2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 90 0.00 57.37 0.00 -10.28 -4.77 0.00 0.00 -0.13 42.19* 30 90 0.39 57.37 0.00 -14.32 -6.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.79----------------------------------------------------------------------------

* Bright Zone !

Segment Leq : 42.08 dBA

Results segment # 3: Dixie (night)----------------------------------

Source height = 1.21 m

ROAD (0.00 + 57.56 + 0.00) = 57.56 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-90 0 0.00 62.03 0.00 -1.46 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Segment Leq : 57.56 dBA

Results segment # 4: Dixie (night)----------------------------------

Source height = 1.21 m

ROAD (0.00 + 55.47 + 0.00) = 55.47 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-90 0 0.00 62.03 0.00 -3.55 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Segment Leq : 55.47 dBA

Total Leq All Segments: 59.82 dBA

TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 67.53(NIGHT): 59.82

Appendix C

Supportive Drawings

A-2

ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS, DETAILS

21 21

12

BLOCK REDBRICK COLOR:

12

9.27.7.1. Materials

9.27.7. Wood Shingles and Shakes

A-2

7

NATURAL INDIANA LIMESTONE

STONE COLOUR:

BLOCK

FRONT (WEST) ELEVATION

12

47

128

128

12

47

LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4

39.66

' (12.0

9M)

9'-0"

(2.74

)

9'-11

" (3.0

2)

LEVELGROUNDFINISHED

112.45

SECOND FLOOR

9'-5"

(2.87

)

8'-6"

(2.59

M)

(0.28

)

TOP OF

11"

U/S OF FLAT CLG.

THIRD FLOOR

FOURTH FLOOR

9'-0"

(2.74

)

11'-3

" (3.4

3)

8'-6"

(2.59

)

9'-5"

(2.87

)

TOP OF

(0.28

)

11"

(0.28

)

TOP OF

11"

(0.69

)2'-

3"

A-27

9.10.1.2. Sloped Roofs

A-28

12

47

Fountain HillConstruction &Consulting Ltd.

4-UNIT TOWNHOMES

A-21

12

47

12

47

REAR (EAST) ELEVATIONA-22

LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4

1412 12

14

SIDE (SOUTH) ELEVATIONA-23

PROP

ERTY

LIN

E

A-2

6

A-2

6

2121

12 12

A-2

7

141212

14

SIDE (NORTH) ELEVATIONA-24

PROP

ERTY

LIN

E

LANEWAY

SECOND FLOOR

8'-0 " [2.46 M]

LANDSCAPED AREA

PROP

ERTY

LINE

TOP OF FLAT ROOF

TOP OF THIRD FLOOR

FLOOR HEIGHTS OFBUILDING :

MIDDLE OF THE ROOF

TOP OFSECONDFLOOR:

TOP OF FOURTH FLOOR

FOURTH FLOOR

112.45

95.47TOP OF SECOND FLOOR

TOP OF FIRST FLOOR

11'-3

"9'-

5"9'-

11"

9'-5"

1R

TOP OFFIRSTFLOOR :

FIRST FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

TOP OF WOOD DECK

ELEVATION @GARAGE DOOR

ACTU

AL B

UILD

ING

HEIG

HT =

39.66

' [12.0

9 M]

(FRO

M TH

E TO

P OF

THE

EST

ABLIS

HED

AVER

AGE

GRAD

E TO

THE

TOP

OF

THE

FLAT

ROO

F )

BUILD

ING

HEIG

HT =

34.30

' [10.4

6 M]

(FRO

M TH

E ES

TABL

ISHE

D AV

ERAG

E GR

ADE

TO T

HE M

ID-P

OINT

OF

THE

FLAT

ROO

F)

20'-0" [6.10 M]

55'-0"[16.77 M]

45'-0" [13.72 M]

TOP OFESTABLISHED AVG.GRADE OF BUILDING

8'-6"

[2.59

M]

11" [

0.28 M

]

2'-3"

9'-0"

12

21

12

21

6'-0"

[1.83

M]

GARAGE

10'-0" (3.05M)

BUILDING SECTIONA-25

PROP

ERTY

LIN

E

LANEWAY

SECOND FLOOR

8'-0 " [2.44 M]

LANDSCAPED AREA

PROP

ERTY

LINE

TOP OF FLAT ROOF

TOP OF THIRD FLOOR

FLOOR HEIGHTS OFBLOCKS A :

MIDDLE OF THE ROOF

TOP OFSECONDFLOOR:

TOP OF FOURTH FLOOR

FOURTH FLOOR

112.45

95.47 TOP OF SECOND FLOOR

TOP OF FIRST FLOOR

11'-3

"9'-

5"9'-

11"

9'-5"

1R

TOP OFFIRSTFLOOR :

FIRST FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

TOP OF WOOD DECK

ELEVATION @GARAGE DOOR

ACTU

AL B

UILD

ING

HEIG

HT =

39.66

' [12.0

9 M]

(FRO

M TH

E TO

P OF

THE

EST

ABLIS

HED

AVER

AGE

GRAD

E TO

THE

TOP

OF

THE

FLAT

ROO

F )

BUILD

ING

HEIG

HT =

34.30

' [10.4

6 M]

(FRO

M TH

E ES

TABL

ISHE

D AV

ERAG

E GR

ADE

TO T

HE M

ID-P

OINT

OF

THE

FLAT

ROO

F)

20'-0" [6.10 M]

55'-0"[16.77 M]

45'-0" [13.72 M]

TOP OFESTABLISHED AVG.GRADE OF BUILDING8'-

6" [2

.59 M

]11

" [0.2

8 M]

2'-3"

9'-0"

12

21

12

21

GARAGE

10'-0" (3.05M)

BUILDING SECTION AT STAIRSA-26

PROP

ERTY

LIN

E

15R

17R

15R

501 50 1

501 50 1

1.23

0.60

112.30112.30

112.10 112.04

(FRO

M TH

E A

VERA

GE G

RADE

TO

THE

TOP

OF T

HE F

LAT

ROOF

)

(FRO

M TH

E AV

ERAG

E GR

ADE

TO M

ID-P

OINT

OF

THE

FLAT

ROO

F)

112.56BUILDINGGRADE OFAVERAGETOP OF

5" [0

.11 M

]39

.66' (1

2.09M

)

9'-0"

(2.74

)

9'-11

" (3.0

2)

LEVELFIRST FL.FINISHED

112.45

SECOND FLOOR

9'-5"

(2.87

)

8'-6"

(2.59

M)

(0.28

)

TOP OF

11"

U/S OF

TOP OF FLAT ROOF

FLAT CLG.

THIRD FLOOR

FOURTH FLOOR

9'-0"

(2.74

)

11'-3

" (3.4

3)

8'-6"

(2.59

)

9'-5"

(2.87

)

TOP OF

(0.28

)

11"

(0.28

)

TOP OF

11"

(0.69

)2'-

3"

(FRO

M TH

E A

VERA

GE G

RADE

TO

THE

TOP

OF T

HE F

LAT

ROOF

)

(FRO

M TH

E AV

ERAG

E GR

ADE

TO M

ID-P

OINT

OF

THE

FLAT

ROO

F)

112.56BUILDINGGRADE OFAVERAGETOP OF

5" [0

.11 M

]

112.56

7'-1"

9'-1"

112.56

15'-2"

A- 3

FLOOR BLOCK PLANS

Fountain HillConstruction &Consulting Ltd.

4-UNIT TOWNHOMES

1ST 2 3 4ND RD TH- - - --

FD.

FURNACE

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY ABOVE

FOYER

PLANTER BOX

UP 15R

12'0"x7'0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR

H.W.T.

DN 1R

MECH.

BOUILDING ABOVE

2 CARGARAGE

RAILI

NG

10'-112"

15'-0"

4'-0" 11'-0"

WAS

TE S

TORA

GE A

REA

DEN

15'-0"

STORAGEUNDERSTAIRS

CUT

DOOR

TO

FIT

FD.

FURNACE

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY ABOVE

FOYER

PLANTER BOX

UP 15R

12'0"x7'0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR

H.W.T.

DN 1R

MECH.

BOUILDING ABOVE

2 CARGARAGE

RAILI

NG

10'-112"

15'-5

1 2"

15'-6"

4'-0"11'-6"

45'-0

"

WAS

TE S

TORA

GE A

REA

WR

DEN

15'-6"

10'-0

"

55'-0

"

39'-6

1 2"

UNDERSTORAGE

STAIRS

CUT

DOOR

TO

FIT

14'-3

"14

'-3"

16'-6

"

1'-412"

FD.

FURNACE

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY ABOVE

FOYER

PLANTER BOX

UP 15R

12'0"x7'0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR

H.W.T.

DN 1R

MECH.

BOUILDING ABOVE

2 CARGARAGE

RAILI

NG

10'-112"

15'-5

1 2"

15'-6"

4'-0" 11'-6"

45'-0

"

WAS

TE S

TORA

GE A

REA

WR

DEN

15'-6"

10'-0

"

55'-0

"

39'-6

1 2"

UNDERSTORAGE

STAIRS

CUT

DOOR

TO

FIT

14'-3

"14

'-3"

16'-6

"

1'-412"

FD.

FURNACE

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY ABOVE

FOYER

PLANTER BOX

UP 15R

12'0"x7'0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR

H.W.T.

DN 1R

MECH.

BOUILDING ABOVE

2 CARGARAGE

RAILI

NG

10'-112"

15'-0"

4'-0"11'-0"

WAS

TE S

TORA

GE A

REA

WR

DEN

15'-0"

STORAGEUNDERSTAIRS

CUT

DOOR

TO

FIT

FLOOR BLOCK PLAN3RD--

FLOOR BLOCK PLAN1ST-- FLOOR BLOCK PLAN2ND

--

DN 15R

13'6"x14'2"

DINING ROOM

14'-2"

10'8"x14'0"

15'0"x10'0"

A/C

DECK

KITCHEN/BREAKFAST

10'-0

"

FLUSH REAKFAST BAR

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY

OPT.

GAS

FIRE

PLAC

E

LOW WALL

15'2"x14'2"LIVING ROOM

UP 17

R

DW

RAILI

NG

S

6'0" H

IGH

PRIV

ACY

FENC

E

6'0" H

IGH

PRIV

ACY

FENC

E

15'-0"

4'-0"11'-0"

15'-0"

13'-6

"

29'-1

1 2"RE

F.PA

NTRY

LOT 2

3'-6"10'-8"

15'-0"

DN 15R

13'6"x14'2"

DINING ROOM

14'-2"

10'8"x14'0"

15'0"x10'0"

A/C

DECK

KITCHEN/BREAKFAST

10'-0

"

FLUSH REAKFAST BAR

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY

OPT.

GAS

FIRE

PLAC

E

LOW WALL

15'2"x14'2"LIVING ROOM

UP 17

RDW

RAILI

NG

S6'0

" HIG

H PR

IVAC

Y FE

NCE

6'0" H

IGH

PRIV

ACY

FENC

E

15'-0"

4'-0" 11'-0"

15'-0"

13'-6

"

29'-1

1 2"RE

F.PA

NTRY

LOT 1

3'-6" 10'-8"

15'-0"

DN 15R

13'6"x14'2"

DINING ROOM

14'-2"

12'0"x14'0"

15'6"x10'0"

A/C

DECK

KITCHEN/BREAKFAST

FLUSH REAKFAST BAR

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY

OPT.

GAS

FIRE

PLAC

E

LOW WALL

15'2"x14'2"LIVING ROOM

UP 17

R

DW

RAILI

NG

S

6'0" H

IGH

PRIV

ACY

FENC

E

6'0" H

IGH

PRIV

ACY

FENC

E

15'-6"

4'-0" 11'-6"

15'-6"13

'-6"

29'-1

1 2"

REF.

PANT

RY

14'-3

"16

'-6"

14'-3

"

1'-412"

3'-6" 12'-0 1/2"

DN 15R

13'6"x14'2"

DINING ROOM

14'-2"

12'0"x14'0"

15'6"x10'0"

A/C

DECK

KITCHEN/BREAKFAST

FLUSH REAKFAST BAR

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY

OPT.

GAS

FIRE

PLAC

E

LOW WALL

15'2"x14'2"LIVING ROOM

UP 17

R

DW

RAILI

NG

S

6'0" H

IGH

PRIV

ACY

FENC

E

6'0" H

IGH

PRIV

ACY

FENC

E

15'-6"

4'-0"11'-6"

15'-6"

13'-6

"

29'-1

1 2"

10'-0

"

REF.

PANT

RY

14'-3

"16

'-6"

14'-3

"

1'-412"

3'-6"12'-0 1/2"

LOT 3 LOT 4LOT 2LOT 1 LOT 3 LOT 4

45'-0

"

55'-0

"

45'-0

"10

'-0"

55'-0

"

FLOOR BLOCK PLAN4 TH-- ROOF BLOCK PLAN--

14'-2"

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY BELOW

DN 17

R

LINE OF BALCONY ABOVE

13'2"x14'2"

LINE OF WALLABOVE

BEDROOM

BEDROOM14'2"x13'2"(12'2")

14'-2"

13'-2

"

12'-2

"

UP 15R

RAILI

NG

HALL

15'-0"

4'-0"11'-0"

15'-0"

#2

#313

'-2"

CL

CL

W/D

T

32"X24"LINEN/

PANTRY

BATH

30"X72" TUB

LAUNDRY

3'-6"3'-10 1/2"6'-5"

3'-6"

14'-2"

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY BELOW

DN 17

R

LINE OF BALCONY ABOVE

13'2"x14'2"

LINE OF WALLABOVE

BEDROOM

BEDROOM14'2"x13'2"(12'2")

14'-2"

13'-2

"

12'-2

"

UP 15R

RAILI

NG

HALL

15'-6"

4'-0"11'-6"

45'-0

"

15'-6"

#2

#3

13'-2

"

BATH

14'-3

"16

'-6"

14'-3

"

1'-412"

3'-6"3'-10 1/2"

3'-6"

16'-1012"

12"

14'-2"

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY BELOW

DN 17

R

LINE OF BALCONY ABOVE

13'2"x14'2"

LINE OF WALLABOVE

BEDROOM

BEDROOM14'2"x13'2"(12'2")

14'-2"

13'-2

"

12'-2

"

UP 15R

RAILI

NG

HALL

15'-6"

4'-0" 11'-6"

45'-0

"

15'-6"

#2

#3

13'-2

"

BATH

14'-3

"16

'-6"

14'-3

"

1'-412"

3'-6" 3'-10 1/2" 7'-8 1/2"

3'-6"

16'-1012"

12"

14'-2"

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY BELOW

DN 17

R

LINE OF BALCONY ABOVE

13'2"x14'2"

LINE OF WALLABOVE

BEDROOM

BEDROOM14'2"x13'2"(12'2")

14'-2"

13'-2

"

12'-2

"

UP 15R

RAILI

NGHALL

15'-0"

4'-0" 11'-0"

15'-0"

#2

#3

13'-2

"

CL

CL

W/D

T

32"X24"LINEN/

PANTRY

BATH

30"X72" TUB

LAUNDRY

3'-6" 3'-10 1/2" 6'-5"

3'-6"

LOT 2LOT 1 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 2LOT 1 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 2LOT 1 LOT 3 LOT 4

SLOP

ESL

OPE

SLOP

ESL

OPE

15'-0"

SLOP

ESL

OPE

15'-0"

SLOP

ESL

OPE

SCALE 1/8"=1'-0"A-33

SCALE 1/8"=1'-0"A-34

SCALE 1/8"=1'-0"A-31

SCALE 1/8"=1'-0"A-32

SCALE 1/8"=1'-0"A-35

15'-6" 15'-6"

15'-6"15'-6"

F.F.112.45F.F.112.45

112.30 112.30

112.30DN 1R

112.30DN 1R

112.30DN 1R

112.30DN 1R

F.F.112.45F.F.112.45

PLANTER BOX

PLAN

TER

BOX

112.10 112.10 112.10 112.10

AVERAGE GRADE OF THE BUILDING: 112.56(AS PER GRADING CALCULATION)

112.2

5

112.2

5

61'-0" (18.59m)

VISITOR PARKING

113.20 113.20 113.20 113.20

SLOP

E 1.

7%

SLOP

E 1.

7%

SLOP

E 1.

7%

SLOP

E 1.

7%

LINE OF WALL BELOW

14'2"x24'3"

24'-3

"

DN 15R

LINE OF ROOF ABOVE

LINE OFWALL BELOW

LINE OFROOF ABOVEBALCONY

MASTER BEDROOM

14'-2"

72" V

ANIT

Y

ENSUITE

15'-2

"

42" H

IGH

KNEE

WAL

L

RAILI

NG

6'-4"

#1

SITTING AREA

W.I.C.

6'-6"

9'-1"

10'-6

"

GLASSSHOWER

W.I.C.

6'-6"

15'-6"

9'-2"

15'-6"

LINE OF WALL BELOW

14'2"x24'3"

24'-3

"

DN 15R

LINE OF ROOF ABOVE

LINE OFWALL BELOW

LINE OFROOF ABOVEBALCONY

MASTER BEDROOM

14'-2"

72" V

ANIT

Y

ENSUITE

15'-2

"

42" H

IGH

KNEE

WAL

L

RAILI

NG

6'-4"

#1

SITTING AREA

W.I.C.

6'-6"

9'-1"

10'-6

"

15'-0"

8'-8"

15'-0"

GLASSSHOWER

W.I.C.

6'-6"

14'-3

"16

'-6"

14'-3

"

1'-0"

45'-0

" 42'-3

"

LINE OF WALL BELOW

14'2"x24'3"

24'-3

"

DN 15R

LINE OF ROOF ABOVE

LINE OFWALL BELOW

LINE OFROOF ABOVE BALCONY

MASTER BEDROOM

14'-2"

72" V

ANIT

Y

ENSUITE

15'-2

"

42" H

IGH

KNEE

WAL

L

RAILI

NG

6'-4"

#1

SITTING AREA

W.I.C.

6'-6"

9'-1"

10'-6

"

15'-0"

8'-8"

15'-0"

GLASSSHOWER

W.I.C.

6'-6"

LINE OF WALL BELOW

14'2"x24'3"

24'-3

"

DN 15R

LINE OF ROOF ABOVE

LINE OFWALL BELOW

LINE OFROOF ABOVE BALCONY

MASTER BEDROOM

14'-2"

72" V

ANIT

Y

ENSUITE

15'-2

"

42" H

IGH

KNEE

WAL

L

RAILI

NG

6'-4"

#1

SITTING AREA

W.I.C.

6'-6"

9'-1"

10'-6

"

GLASSSHOWER

W.I.C.

6'-6"

15'-6"

9'-2"

15'-6"

14'-3

"16

'-6"

14'-3

"

1'-0"

45'-0

"42'-3

"

BENCH BENCH BENCH BENCH

CL

9'5"x7'9"

CL

9'5"x7'9"

CL

9'5"x7'9"

CL

9'5"x7'9"

WR

36"x

50"

OPT.

ISLA

ND

PANT

RYPA

NTRY

24"x

60"

KITC

HEN

CABI

NET

C/W

LOW

ER D

OORS

36"x

50"

OPT.

ISLA

ND

PANT

RYPA

NTRY

24"x

60"

KITC

HEN

CABI

NET

C/W

LOW

ER D

OORS

36"x

50"

OPT.

ISLA

ND

PANT

RYPA

NTRY

24"x

60"

KITC

HEN

CABI

NET

C/W

LOW

ER D

OORS

36"x

50"

OPT.

ISLA

ND

PANT

RYPA

NTRY

24"x

60"

KITC

HEN

CABI

NET

C/W

LOW

ER D

OORS

CL

CL

W/DT

32"X24"LINEN/

PANTRY

BATH

LAUNDRY

5'-6"

CL

CL

W/DT

32"X24"LINEN/

PANTRY

BATH

LAUNDRY

5'-6"

5'-91 2"

5'-91 2"

7'-8 1/2"7'-8 1/2"

14'-3

"16

'-6"

14'-3

"

1'-0"

45'-0

"

LINE OF WALL BELOW

14'2"x24'3"

24'-3

"

DN 15R

LINE OF ROOF ABOVE

LINE OFWALL BELOW

LINE OFROOF ABOVEBALCONY

MASTER BEDROOM

14'-2"

72" V

ANIT

Y

ENSUITE

15'-2

"

42" H

IGH

KNEE

WAL

L

RAILI

NG

43'-3

"

6'-4"

#1

SITTING AREA

W.I.C.

6'-6"

9'-1"

10'-6

"

15'-0"

42'-3

"

8'-8"

15'-0"

GLASSSHOWER

W.I.C.

6'-6"

1'-0"

45'-0

" 42'-3

"

A-4

TYPICAL FLOOR PLANS

Fountain HillConstruction &Consulting Ltd.

4-UNIT TOWNHOMES

14'-2"

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY BELOW

DN 15R

13'6"x14'2"

FD.

FURNACE

DINING ROOM

AMANDAFIRST FLOOR PLAN

14'-2"

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY ABOVE

FOYER

PLANTER BOX

DN 17

R

LINE OF BALCONY ABOVE

13'2"x14'2"

LINE OF WALLABOVE

BEDROOM

BEDROOM14'2"x13'2"(12'2")

14'-2"

13'-2

"

12'-2

"

UP 15R

10'8"x14'0"

15'0"x10'0"

A/C

UP 15R

12'0"x7'0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR

H.W.T.

DECK

DN 1R

KITCHEN/BREAKFAST

10'-0

"

MECH.

BOUILDING ABOVE

2 CARGARAGE

FLUSH REAKFAST BAR

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY

SECOND FLOOR PLAN FOURTH FLOOR PLAN

RAILI

NG

HALL

OPT.

GAS

FIRE

PLAC

E

LOW WALL

15'2"x14'2"LIVING ROOM

UP 17

R

DW

RAILI

NG

RAILI

NG

10'-112"

S

6'0" H

IGH

PRIV

ACY

FENC

E

15'-5

1 2"

6'0" H

IGH

PRIV

ACY

FENC

E

15'-0"

54'-0

"

4'-0"11'-0"

45'-0

"

1'-0"

15'-0"

44'-0

"

4'-0"11'-0"

45'-0

"

1'-0"

15'-0"

44'-0

"

4'-0"11'-0"

45'-0

"

1'-0"

TOTAL GFA = 258 S.F. TOTAL GFA = 671 S.F. TOTAL GFA = 640 S.F.

15'-0"

WAS

TE S

TORA

GE A

REA

13'-6

"

14'-1

11 2"

CL

29'-1

1 2"

WR

15'-0"

THIRD FLOOR PLAN

#2

#3

SLOP

ESL

OPE

ROOF PLAN

15'-0"

9'5"x7'9"DEN

15'-0"

TOTAL GFA = 671 S.F.

AMANDA

13'-2

"

CL

CL

W/D

T

32"X24"LINEN/

PANTRY

BATH

30"X72" TUB

LAUNDRY

10'-0

"

REF.

15'-5

1 2"14

'-7"

PANT

RY

10'-0

"

55'-0

"

39'-6

1 2"

STORAGEUNDERSTAIRS

CUT

DOOR

TO

FIT

14'-2"

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY BELOW

DN 15R

13'6"x14'2"

FD.

FURNACE

DINING ROOM

KRISTENFIRST FLOOR PLAN

14'-2"

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY ABOVE

FOYER

PLANTER BOX

DN 17

R

LINE OF BALCONY ABOVE

13'2"x14'2"

LINE OF WALLABOVE

BEDROOM

BEDROOM14'2"x13'2"(12'2")

14'-2"

13'-2

"

12'-2

"

UP 15R

12'0"x14'0"

15'6"x10'0"

A/C

UP 15R

12'0"x7'0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR

H.W.T.

DECK

DN 1R

KITCHEN/BREAKFAST

MECH.

BOUILDING ABOVE

2 CARGARAGE

FLUSH REAKFAST BAR

CEDAR SHAKECANOPY

SECOND FLOOR PLAN FOURTH FLOOR PLAN

RAILI

NG

HALL

OPT.

GAS

FIRE

PLAC

E

LOW WALL

15'2"x14'2"LIVING ROOM

UP 17

R

DW

RAILI

NG

RAILI

NG

10'-112"

S

6'0" H

IGH

PRIV

ACY

FENC

E

15'-5

1 2"

6'0" H

IGH

PRIV

ACY

FENC

E

15'-6"

54'-0

"

4'-0"11'-6"

45'-0

"

1'-0"

15'-6"

44'-0

"

4'-0"11'-6"

45'-0

"

1'-0"

15'-6"

44'-0

"

4'-0"11'-6"

45'-0

"

1'-0"

TOTAL GFA = 250 S.F. TOTAL GFA = 716.20 S.F. TOTAL GFA = 659.60 S.F.

36"x

50"

OPT.

ISLA

ND

15'-6"

WAS

TE S

TORA

GE A

REA

13'-6

"

14'-1

11 2"

29'-1

1 2"

WR

15'-6"

THIRD FLOOR PLAN

#2

#3

SLOP

ESL

OPE

ROOF PLAN

15'-0"

DEN

15'-6"

TOTAL GFA = 716.20 S.F.

KRISTEN

13'-2

"

CL

CL

W/DT

32"X24"LINEN/

PANTRY

BATH

LAUNDRY

10'-0

"

REF.

15'-5

1 2"14

'-7"

PANT

RY

10'-0

"

55'-0

"

39'-6

1 2"

UNDERSTORAGE

STAIRS

CUT

DOOR

TO

FIT

Fountain HillConstruction &

4-UNIT TOWNHOMES

Consulting Ltd.

Fountain Hill

Consulting Ltd.Construction &

4-UNIT TOWNHOMES

14'-3

"14

'-3"

16'-6

"

14'-3

"16

'-6"

14'-3

"

14'-3

"16

'-6"

14'-3

"

1'-412" 1'-41

2" 1'-412"

3'-6"3'-10 1/2"6'-5"

3'-6"

3'-6"10'-8"

3'-6"3'-10 1/2"7'-8 1/2"

3'-6"

16'-1012"

12"

3'-6"12'-0 1/2"

42'-3

"1'-

0"

LINE OF WALL BELOW

14'2"x24'3"

24'-3

"

DN 15R

LINE OF ROOF ABOVE

LINE OFWALL BELOW

LINE OFROOF ABOVEBALCONY

MASTER BEDROOM

14'-2"

72" V

ANIT

Y

ENSUITE

15'-2

"

42" H

IGH

KNEE

WAL

L

RAILI

NG

43'-3

"

6'-4"

#1

SITTING AREA

W.I.C.

6'-6"

9'-1"

10'-6

"

GLASSSHOWER

W.I.C.

6'-6"

15'-6"

9'-2"

15'-6"

BENCH

BENCH

AMANDA AMANDA AMANDA AMANDA

KRISTEN KRISTEN KRISTEN KRISTEN

CL

9'5"x7'9"

PANT

RYPA

NTRY

24"x

60"

KITC

HEN

CABI

NET

C/W

LOW

ER D

OORS

36"x

50"

OPT.

ISLA

ND

PANT

RYPA

NTRY

24"x

60"

KITC

HEN

CABI

NET

C/W

LOW

ER D

OORS

5'-6"

5'-91 2"