monitoring programme (namp) - cpcb enviscpcbenvis.nic.in/airpollution/presentation1-drsa-aaqm... ·...
Post on 31-Mar-2020
6 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
N
ARABIAN SEA
Cities under National Air Quality
Monitoring Programme (NAMP)
Lucknow
Vishakhapatnam
CHATTISGARH
Gulbarga
Mysore
Bangalore
KERALA
Palakkad
Thiruvananthapuram
Kottayam
Kozhikode
Kochi
Kolhapur
Pune
Vasco GOA Panjim
Lote
Hassan
Mangalore
KARNATAKA
Dharwad Belgaum
Hubli
Solapur
Solem Coimbatore
Madurai
TAMIL NADU
Tirupati
Hyderabad
Chennai
Pondicherry
ANDHRA PRADESH
Kurnool
Vijayavada
GUJARAT
Rajkot Jamnagar
Parwanoo Shimla Jalandhar
Nagda
Naya Nangal
Hissar
Yamuna Nagar
Chandigarh
Aurangabad
Alwar
DELHI Fridabad
HARYANA
MAHARASHTRA
PUNJAB
Ankaleshwar
DADAR NAGAR HAVELI
Vadodara
Mumbai
Surat
Diu Daman
Tarapur
Silwasa
Thane
Vapi Nasik
Ujjain
Udaipur
Indore
RAJASTHAN
Jodhpur Jaipur
Kota
Ludhiana
Chandrapur
Nagpur
MADHYA PRADESH I N D I A
Bhopal
Bhilai
Jabalpur
Firozabad
Ghaziabad
Paonta Sahib Kala Amb
Dehradun
UTTARANCHAL
UTTAR PRADESH Noida
Gwalior
Agra
Gajraula
Khanna
Kanpur
Jammu
JAMMU & KASHMIR
HIMACHAL PRADESH Damtal
BAY OF BENGAL
MANIPUR
MIZORAM WEST BENGAL
Asansol
Howrah Haldia
Kolkata
Gangtok
Behrampur
Angul
Sambalpur
Raurkela
Jamshedpur
Bhubaneshwar ORISSA
JHARKHAND
Ranchi
Rayagada
Raipur
Anpara
Bilaspur
Talcher Cuttack
Dhanbad
Jharia
BIHAR Patna
Durgapur TRIPURA
Guwahati
SIKKIM
MEGHALYA Shillong
ASSAM
ARUNACHAL PRADESH
NAGALAND
Dimapur
Ahmadabad
Tuticorin
Mormugao
Aizwal Sagar
Satna
Bongiagaon
Sindri Singrauli
Varanasi
Baddi
Ambarnath
Legend • - Cities under NAMP (Not to scale)
Navi Mumbai
Meerut Khurja
Jhansi
Ramagundum Patencheru
Different monitoring modes & facility under NAMP
Ambient Air Quality trend in four mega cities-India
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
SO2 NO2 PM10 SO2 NO2 PM10 SO2 NO2 PM10 SO2 NO2 PM10
Delhi Mumbai Kolkata Chennai
Co
nce
ntr
ati
on
in
µg
/m3
Cities & parameters
Air quality trends in Four Mega Cities of India
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
NAAQS: SO2-50µg/m3
NO2-40µg/m3 PM10-60µg/m3
Air quality trend in mega cities
Trends in Annual Average Concentration in Four Mega Cities
Locations / stations with low, moderate, high and critical pollution levels
Major findings during 2010
98
9
0
4
10 0
1616
12
0
0
5
10
15
20
SO2 NO2 PM10Parameter
Num
ber
of lo
cations
Low Moderat e High Crit ical
Percentage of locations in residential/industrial/commercial/rural and ecologically sensitive ares with low, moderate, high & critical
pollution level 2010
Percentage of locations in residential/industrial/commercial/rural and ecologically
sensitive ares with low, moderate, high & critical pollution level
50
04
40
17
3633 35
0.3
10
29
0
17
40
8
53
0 0
62
96
42
1
64
0
20
40
60
80
100
SO2 NO2 PM10 SO2 NO2 PM10
Parameter
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of lo
ca
tio
ns
Low Moderate High Critical
----Residential/Industrial/Rural/Others---- --------Ecologically sensitive area------
Cities with low,
moderate, high and
critical pollution
levels 2010
Number of cities w ith low, moderate, high & critical pollution level (residential
/ industrial / rural / other area)
10
63
34
110
47
09
83
153
83
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
SO2 NO2 PM10Parameter
Num
ber
of citi
es
LowModerateHighCritical
Pollution level Annual Mean Concentration Range (µg/m3) Industrial, Residential, Rural & other areas
SO2 NO2 PM10
Low (L) 0-25 0-20 0-30
Moderate (M) 26-50 21-40 31-60
High (H) 51-75 41-60 61-90
Critical (C) >75 >60 >90
Percentage of cities showing low,
moderate, high and critical level of
SO2
01
93
6
Percentage of cities showing low,
moderate, high and critical level of NO2
5
50
38
6
Low
Moderate
High
Critical
Percentage of cities showing low,
moderate, high and critical level PM10
50
1
21
28
Pollution level Annual Mean Concentration Range (µg/m3) Industrial, Residential, Rural & other areas
SO2 NO2 RSPM
Low (L) 0-25 0-20 0-30
Moderate (M) 26-50 21-40 31-60
High (H) 51-75 41-60 61-90
Critical (C) >75 >60 >90
Percentage of cities showing low,
moderate, high and critical level of
SO2, NO2 and PM10 (residential /
industrial / rural / other area)
Annual average concentration of pollutants in different States and Union territories 2010
SO2
7
5
2
11
7 7
5
1415
14
3
5
23
10
4
11
17
2 2 2
5
11
67
9
12
10
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
SO2States
Con
cent
ratio
n in
mic
rogr
am p
er c
ubic
met
er
NO2
15
26
16
22
18 18
55
18
23 23
1513
39
22
13
17
31
10
6 6
18
27
13
29
20
30
64
17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
NO2
States
Con
cent
ratio
n in
mic
rogr
am p
er c
ubic
met
er
PM10
76
118
92
107
39 35
68
89
171
88
105
70
42
137
101 101
42
68
86
38
70
181169
110
73
261
193 187
168
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
PM10
States
Co
nc
en
tra
tio
n i
n m
icro
gra
m p
er c
ub
ic m
ete
r
Andhra Pradesh Assam
Bihar Chandigarh
Chat t isgarh Dadra & Nagar Haveli
Daman & Diu Delhi
Goa Gujarat
Haryana Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir Jharkhand
Karnat aka Kerala
Madhya Pradesh Maharasht ra
Meghalaya Mizoram
Nagaland Orissa
Punjab Puducherry
Rajast han Tamilnadu
Ut t ar Pradesh Ut t arakhand
West Bengal
Yearly Trends of Low, Moderate, High and Critical levels of SO2,
NO2 and PM10 (Residential areas; percentage of location)
Nitrogen dioxide
6 2 6 570
6 56 0 6 4
6 9 70
4 2 4 2
3 02 9
2 52 8 3 7
3 4 2 7 2 7
4 84 0
6 5 5 82 4 3
7
10
381
2 1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Year
% o
f lo
cati
on
Low Moderate High Critical
Yearly Trends of Low, Moderate, High and Critical levels of SO2, NO2 and PM10 (Residential areas; percentage of location)
PM10
2 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 1
1210
17 17 18 19 1817 17 17
24 24
28
22 22
26 27 33 3429
64 63
53
6058
54 5350 49
53
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
% o
f lo
ca
tio
n
Low Moderate High Critical
National mean concentration of different locations that fall under 10th and 90th percentile for SO2, NO2 and PM10
0
10
20
30
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Year
Concentr
ation (
µg/m
3)
90% of Sites have concentrations below this line
10% of Sites have concentrations below this line
Average
SO2
a.
SO2: within NAAQS at almost all cities
decreasing trend (reduction of sulphur in diesel
National mean concentration of different locations that fall under 10th and 90th percentile for SO2, NO2 and PM10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Year
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
µg
/m3)
90% of Sites have concentrations below this line
10% of Sites have concentrations below this line
Average
NO2
b.
NO2: within NAAQS in most cities
National mean concentration of different locations that fall under 10th and 90th percentile for SO2, NO2 and PM10
0
50
100
150
200
250
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Year
Concentr
ation (
µg/m
3) 90% of Sites have concentrations below this line
10% of Sites have concentrations below this line
Average
PM10
c.
PM10 exceed NAAQS in many cities (increase in number of vehicles, industrial
emissions, natural dust and re-suspension of dust.
EDB
LIMITATIONS IN EDB
DATA
VALIDATION
GAPS IN UPDATION
DATA QUALITY & OUTLIERS
N
Y
N
Y
PAYMENT COMPILATION & ANALYSIS
SP
SB
, P
CC
, N
EE
RI
PA
MS
-CP
CB
SPCB, PCC, NEERI
SPCB, PCC, NEERI
to update query
manual
top related