jump on the cloud
Post on 20-Aug-2015
1.372 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
A PERSPECTIVE ON CLOUD COMPUTING
Gordon GraylishVice President & General Manager
Enterprise Solution SalesSales and Marketing Group, Intel Corp
The Internetis
BIG &GROWING
25% of the world is connected
> 250 Million Websites
45B Web Searches per Month
1 Billion videos served up by YouTube everyday.
30 Billion Videos Viewed each month
182 – number of online videos avg internet user
watches per month
100,000 Blogs Created Daily
$750B Dollars Online Sales Worldwide
50 Million Tweets a day 600 Tweets per second
Source: Forrester, ABI, Facebook statistics
500M Active Users on Facebook
50% of Active Facebook users login every day
>30Bn pieces of content shared of Facebook each
month
If the Internet were a movie we’d still be in the opening credits…
Point of Sale IP CamerasPower Lines IP PhonesIn-VehicleInfotainment
Home Storage
Sensors Net book
Security IPTV/IMS Military/AeroLearning Home AutoDigital Signage PortableMedical
Net top
Gaming Industrial PC PrintersMedical Transport Robotics FactoryAutomation
MID
From Genomic research to Connecting Cars…it’s Only the Beginning
Genomics Research
Medical Imaging
Financial Analysis
Weather Prediction
Oil Exploration
Design Simulation
Cloud Computing
Data Center Refresh
The World is FlatMobile device as std biz client, secure connectivity Anytime/anywhere. Unified communications. Web 2.0
Faster Business Clock SpeedReal-time biz intelligence; data explosion; Utility infrastructure; rapid re-provisioning
The World is GreenLow power clients (HUGI)Data center utilization tunable consumption
Business Trend & Technology Response
Innovation Beyond the Firewall “Everything” as a Service (SOA, Cloud), Consumerization, ,Embedded Clients
Efficient ITConsolidation & re-platforming. Dynamic resource management. Automation. Outsourcing. Cloud computing
The Internet Underpins the Next Wave of Enterprise Computing…
Data Center
Factory / Warehouse
Digital Offices
Mobile Workforce
Mobile Consumer
ISP / Telco
Supplier
Outsourcer
Customers
…eCommerce to Enterprise Cloud…
The corporate boundariesare blurring.
The cloud is emerging.
Cloud computing is not so much a definition of a single term but a trend in Service
Delivery.
CEO = Growth Opportunity
CIO = IT impacts business value
IT Director = Effective IT Utilisation
Enabled by a set of new technologies where Services and data reside in shared, dynamically scalable resource pools
Why is a new Service Delivery Model is Needed ?
Source: IDC, “Virtualization and Multicore Innovations Disrupt the Worldwide Server Market,” Document 206035,Publish date: March 2007
Worldwide IT Spending on Servers, Power and Cooling, and Management/Administration
US$0
US$50
US$100
US$150
US$200
US$250
US$300
‘96 ‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 ‘01 ‘02 ‘03 ‘04 ‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10
Installed Base
(M Units)
Spending
(US$B)
10
20
30
40
50
New Server Spending
Server Management and Administration Costs
Power and Cooling Costs
0
...to regain OpEx control and meet financial expectations
Install base cumulative
IT Budgetary Perspective –Balance Strategic with
Tactical
Remove Barriers, Lower TCO• Accelerate infrastructure refresh• Secure information & assets• Standardize & optimize• Virtualization : utilization• Virtualization : flexibility• Datacenter Power Efficiencies
Source: Gartner IT Key Metrics Data 2008
Innovate(private cloud)
Maintain(Keep the lights on) Enhance
(near term wins)
Drive Transformation●A Service Oriented Utility
infrastructure
Considering Cloud Deployment Today
Intel IT Strategy: develop private clouds while adopting best of breed public cloud services
Virtual Private and Hybrid
clouds
Cloud Brokers
Behind the Firewall
Private Clouds
Security Compliance and
Governance Interoperability
Public Clouds
Multi-tenant Rapid Deployment Reduced Capital
Expenditure External vendor expertise
What is Holding Back the Cloud Today?
A cultural shift and technology advancement is needed
Technology Maturation
SecurityLack of automation
DC Power ConstraintsStandards
Acceptance of Risk
IP protectionInteroperability and lock in Compliance
and auditGuaranteed quality
of service
The Cloud Drives New expectations of the Data
Center
Client AwareSecure access and optimal experience
across the client continuum
AutomatedDynamically
allocates resources to
manage service level and optimize
power
FederatedData and services
seamlessly and
securely span clouds
Desktops Laptops EmbeddedSmartphonesNetbooks Personal Devices
Smart TVs
Architectural Principles for Next Generation Data Centers
Efficient Optimizing
technologies to decrease energy,
human and physical asset consumption
SecureReduce the risk,
increase the compliance and manage hybrid usage models
SimplifiedSimplify data centre operations to
reduce cables, complexity and cost
Optimizing energy consumption, simplifying and securing your Data centre infrastructure
Moore’s Law Drives Energy Efficiency
Source: Intel Corporate Technology Group
• ~1 million factor reduction in energy/transistor over 30+ years• Delivering great performance within power envelope• Compute energy efficiency Positive impact on environment
Core Integer Performance Over Time*Power reduction Over Time*
Pentium® Pro Processor
Pentium® -II ProcessorPentium® -IIi Processor
Pentium® 4 Processor
Pentium® 4 Processor EE
Pentium® -D Processor
Core™ 2 Duo Processor X6800
Core™ 2 Duo Extreme QX6700
i486DX2
i486
386
Pentium® Processor
1986 200819881990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 20061
10
100
1000
10000
Single Core Moore’s Law
1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 20101.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
Efficient
CoolingHVAC, Water Chillers
Power(UPC, etc.)
ComputeServers, Storage, Communications
Overhead
Technology Efficient Alternatives
Airside Economizers, Water
Chilled Cabinets, Warm Datacenters
DC Power (New Facilities Only)
Efficient Servers (SpecPower*),
Refresh, Instrumentation
Investment Goals
Minimize Cost/kw Use, Optimize
Cooling Capacity
Optimize Power Delivery to Racks
Maximize Performance Density and
Performance EfficiencyMinimize Cooling
Load/Rack
Optimize Investment on Productivity Drivers
Efficient
Datacenter Investment Alternatives
Platform capabilities:Energy efficient Intel® Xeon® processors & Intel®
Data Center Manager & Node Manager
EfficientDrive Efficiency Across the Breadth of the Data Center
●Up to 5x efficiency improvement in 5 years15
●Near linear power scaling between idle & max
●Near native virtualized performance
●Data center level power management drives 40% utilization improvement16
●Solid state data center for 100X bandwidth, 80% lower power17
●Driving PUE below 1.25
Efficient
Secure Secure Execution and Data Protection at Rest and In Flight
VM VM VM VM
Cloud Software Infrastructure
●Pervasive use of data encryption
●Protected and locked down virtual machines in multi-tenancy environments
●Hardware enforced audit and compliance
●Resiliency built in for defense and recovery from faults
Platform Capabilities:Intel ® Virtualization Technologies & Encryption Capabilities Available Today Eco System Enabling of Trusted
Execution Technologies for 2011
Secure
SimplifiedReduce the Avalanche of Data Center Complexity
●Flexible infrastructure across compute, storage and network
●Unified network & storage fabric
●Scalable management for 1M+ nodes
●Resources exposed to enable optimized services across a range of clients
Adopt 10GbE for unified storage and network trafficDesign with Intel® Xeon® processors for compute & storage
flexibility
Unified Fabric
Servers Storage Arrays
Mgmt
Simplified
Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock
Intel® Core™Microarchitecture
NehalemMicroarchitecture
Sandy BridgeMicroarchitecture
65nm 45nm 32nm
MeromPenryn
Nehalem Sandy
BridgeWestmere Future
Processor
Tick-Tock Development ModelSustained Microprocessor Leadership
22nm
2010onward
s
Intel ®Xeon ® Processor 5600
Boost Performance, Lower IT Costs, Enhance Security
Intel® 5520
Chipset
PCI Express* 2.0
ICH 9/10Intel® X25-ESSDs
Intel® 82599 10GbE
Controller
Westmere-EP Westmere-EP
Better Energy EfficiencySame performance as X5570 and up to 30% lower power1
Secure VirtualizationEncrypt today
Measure & Enforce tomorrow
Performance LeadershipUp to 60% performance boost2
5-month refresh ROI3
1 Source: Fujitsu Performance measurements comparing Xeon L5650 vs X5570 SKUs using SPECint_rate_base2006.See http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=0140b19d-56e3-4b24-a01e-26b8a80cfe53 and http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=4af74e10-24b1-4cf8-bb3b-9c4f5f177389
2 Source: Internal Intel measurements for Xeon® X5680 vs. Xeon® X5570 on BlackScholes*.3 Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only.
For notes and disclaimers, see performance and legal information slides at end of this presentation.
Intel Architecture - a Transformational Path
Where Will You Invest Tomorrow?
The
“economic platform”
for building an enterprise
A Common Foundation with Server Choices to balance Standardization with Optimization
Standardization Vs. Optimization
StandardizationSimpler automation process
Highest modularity and expandability
OptimizationThe best HW for every application instance
Maximize utilization of space and power
How do you do both ?
2010
Efficiency Refresh
15:1As Low as
5 MonthPayback
95% Annual Energy Cost Reduction (estimated)
1 rack of Intel® Xeon® 5600 Based Servers
Performance Refresh
1:1
Up to 15x Performance
15 racks of Intel® Xeon® 5600 Based
Servers
8% Annual Energy Costs Estimated Reduction (estimated)
2005
15 racks of Intel® Xeon® Single Core
Servers
Server RefreshSingle Core Xeon® 5600
– OR –
Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and
assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup.
Server Refresh ROI : Intel Can Help You Make the Case
www.intel.com/go/xeonestimator
• Rapid Payback
• Dramatic Savings
• Unique Opportunity
Intel® Cloud Builders Program:Facilitating cloud development and deployment
Leading the ecosystem to help organizations build the Cloudwww.intel.com/cloudbuilder
Cloud Reference Architectures, &
Tools
Open Cirrus™ & Research
Universities
Intel Cloud Test Bed & POCs
Deployment Best Practices
Building Optimized
Clouds
Advanced Cloud
Research
Summary• Know where you’re going – don’t lose
sight of your vision
• Balance tactical projects with strategic direction
• How much could you save whilst transforming your business with Information Technology ?
• Check out the demo’s on the Intel booth
• www.intel.com/cloudbuilder
Thank You
Sources1. IDC “Server Workloads Forecast” 20092. IDC “The Internet Reaches Late Adolescence” Dec 2009, extrapolation by Intel for 2015 3. ECG “Worldwide Device Estimates Year 2020 - Intel One Smart Network Work” forecast4. http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics5. http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2010/1/
November_Sees_Number_of_U.S._Videos_Viewed_Online_Surpass_30_Billion_for_First_Time_on_Record6. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/we-knew-web-was-big.html7. 8x Network: 800 Terabytes / second of IP traffic estimated on Internal Intel analysis “Network Supply/Demand
2010-2020” forecast . 16x Storage: 60 Exabytes of data stored from Barclays Capital “Storage Bits” Sept 2009, extrapolation by Intel for 2015; 20x Compute: Intel Internal LRP forecast. Extrapolated to 1 billion virtual servers using 1 vm/core
8. http://open.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/01/self-service-prorated-super-computing-fun/9. http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/13/facebook-now-has-30000-servers/ 10. http://www.globalfoundationservices.com/documents/MSFTTop10BusinessPracticesforESDataCentersApril09.pdf/ 11. Jonathan Kooney, 6/09. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/magazine/14search-t.html?
_r=3&ref=magazine&pagewanted=all12. Data Center Knowledge, 4/09 http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/04/08/fbi-defends-dallas-
equipment-seizures/13. Summary of spending between 2010 and 2014. Intel commission analysis with Bain Consulting based on: IDC
“Server Workloads Forecast” 2009, AMI US SB/MB Overview and Market Opportunity Assessment 2006 Gartner “WW IT Services Forecast” 2009; Cowen & Co “VMware” (July 2009); IDC 2009 “Optimizing Infrastructure and Service Management in Tough Economic Times”, analyst reports, IDC storage & networking reports, Gartner 2009 WW IT Services Forecast, BLS, Computer Economics, PrincipledTechnology, expert interviews, Bain analysis
14. Winston Bumpus, DMTF 6/09 http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/node/936264 15. Intel, 2010 review of performance and performance efficiency benchmarks - SPECint and SPECpower - across
multiple server generations and forecast for future improvement of future generation products16. Baidu whitepaper, 2009 posted at intel.com17. http://www.embedded.com/products/oem/212001590?_requestid=19579
Investing for the Future
Total Spending in New Businesses 25% CAGR for 2006-2009
CORE
2009 R&D Spending
25%IN NEW AREAS
Includes: Handhelds, Consumer Electronics, Embedded, Graphics,
WiMAX
Spending
Capital Additions to Property,Plant and Equipment
(Dollars in Billions)
Research and Development(Dollars in Billions)
5.7 5.7
3.9 3.8 4.04.4
4.85.1
5.9 5.8
200820092000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
5.24.5
6.77.3
4.7
3.7 3.8
5.9 5.9
5.0
2008 20092000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
OpenMulti-vendor innovation with compatibility of solutions
●Workload portability across clouds−Data Center Mgmt taskforce (co-chair)−OGF’s Open Cloud computing Interface
(OCCI)−Multiple virtualization forums
●Multi-vendor choice and integration− Common APIs, protocols and interfaces− Server Systems Infrastructure (SSI)
standards− IEEE, PCI-SIG & IETF
●Trust and transparency with security policy, best practices and technologies
−Cloud Security Alliance (CSA)
Adopt solutions and support standards that have the greatest levels of compatibility and
interoperability
Cloud Infrastructure
Network
Storage
Compute
Security
Datacenter facilities (e.g. cooling, power)
Intel IT Cloud Computing Strategy
Grow the Cloud from the inside out
• Current: Grow internal cloud
• Interim: Transform existing environment to internal cloud
• Future: Move between internal and external cloud
Xeon 5600 Performance Claim Backup60% Performance, 40% Perf/Watt, and 30% Lower Power
Up to 1.6x performance compared to Xeon 5500 series claim supported by a CPU intensive benchmark (Blackscholes). Intel internal measurement. (Feb 25, 2010) Configuration details: - Blackscholes* Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570
(2.93 GHz, 8 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 18.74 seconds.
New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 11.51 seconds.
Up to 40% higher performance/watt compared to Intel® Xeon® Processor 5500 Series claim supported by performance results on a server side java benchmark in conjunction with power consumption across a load line. Intel internal measurement (Jan 15, 2010) Baseline platform: Intel preproduction server platform with two Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® processor X5570, 2.93 GHz,
8MB L3 cache, 6.4QPI, 8GB memory (4x2GB DDR3-1333), 1 PSU, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Enterprise SP2. Intel internal measurement as of January 15,2010.
New platform: Intel preproduction server platform with two six-Core Intel® Xeon® processor X5670, 2.93 GHz, 12MB L3 cache, 6.4QPI, 8GB memory (4x2GB DDR3-1333), 1 PSU, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Enterprise SP2. Intel internal measurement as of January 15, 2010.
Intel® Xeon® processor 5600 series with Intel microarchitecture Nehalem delivers similar performance as previous-generation servers but uses up to 30 percent less power Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark: - Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S5 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor
sX5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev. R1.09 , Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 5 x Fans, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1 x Fujitsu MBD2147RC 147GB 10K RPM 2.5” SAS HDD, 1x800W PSU, SLES 11 (X86_64) Kernel 2.6.27.19-5-default. Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 250. http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=0140b19d-56e3-4b24-a01e-26b8a80cfe53
New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processors L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Hex-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev R1.00A , Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 5 x Fans, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 LV DR registered ECC), 1 x Fujitsu MBD2147RC 147GB 10K RPM 2.5” SAS HDD, 1x800W PSU, SLES 11 (X86_64) Kernel 2.6.27.19-5-default. Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 250 http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=4af74e10-24b1-4cf8-bb3b-9c4f5f177389
Xeon 5600 Performance Summary BackupMainstream Server Benchmarks
42% gain on Single Node server SPECpower*_ssj2008 at similar power level over previous generation processors supported by the following:Baseline Configuration and Score: Referenced as published at 2053 overall ssj_ops/watt
http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2009q4/power_ssj2008-20091023-00205.html New Configuration and Score: IBM x3650 M3 was configured with the Intel Xeon Processor X5670 (2.93GHz, 256KB L2 cache per core, 12MB L3
cache per processor—12 cores/2 chips/6 cores per chip) and 12GB of PC3L-10600R(6 x 2GB) memory and ran IBM Java™6 Runtime Environment and Microsoft® Windows® Server 2008 R2 Enterprise x64 Edition. Score: 2,927 overall ssj_ops/watt. Submitted and in review at www.spec.org
46% gain on SPECjbb2005 supported by the following:Baseline Configuration and Score: 632,425 bops, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 158106
http://www.spec.org/osg/jbb2005/results/res2010q1/jbb2005-20100210-00803.htmlNew Configuration and Score: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processors X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-
core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, Data Reuse Optimization disabled, all prefetchers disabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1 x Seagate 73GB 10K RPM 2.5” SAS HDD, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise, IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Windows Server 2008 amd64-64 jvmwa6460sr6-20090923_42924). Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECjbb2005 score: bops= 928393, bops/JVM= 154732 http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=71488796-7a53-46b8-9163-61373214c2ef
27% boost on SAP ERP 6.0 Unicode over previous generation supported by the following:Baseline Configuration and Score: 3800 Number of SAP SD benchmark users
http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C259FFE6AB54898440C838DED66684AFD7D58B23A917F4C0DNew Configuration and Score : Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-
core, 130W TDP), 88 GB main memory, Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Edition, SQL Server 2008, SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode). Source: www.sap.com Score: 4860 Number of SAP SD benchmark users
40% gain on SPECint_rate_2006 over previous generation supported by the following:Baseline Configuration and Score: Score: 253 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100202-09561.html New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core,
130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 12 workloads: 355
42% gain on VMMark* over previous generation supported by the following:Baseline Configuration and Score: Cisco result referenced as published at 25.06 at 17 tiles. For more information see
www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Cisco-2010-01-12-B200M1.pdf New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Cisco UCS B250 M2 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4
GT/s, 6-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 192GB memory (48x4GB DDR3 1333), EMC CLARiiON CX4-240 storage system with 25x73GB SSD, 20 x 450GB 15K RPM, 5 x 300GB 15K RPM, VMware vSphere 4,0 U1 Source: www.cisco.com. Score of 35.83@26 tiles. For more information see: www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/ps10265/at_work_promo.html#~industry_benchmarks.
Xeon 5600 Performance Summary BackupTechnical Computing Benchmarks
STREAM: Baseline Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing TR1012. Score of workloads: 36588.0 MB/sNew Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: MB/s.
CAE: Baseline Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applicationsNew Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications
SPECfp_rate: 25% gain on SPECfp_rate_base2006 over previous generation supported by the following:Baseline Configuration and Score: Score 197, Referenced as published at http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q2/cpu2006-20090511-07354.html New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 17 workloads: 248.
LIFE SCIENCES: Baseline Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applicationsNew Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications
LINPACK: Baseline Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 02/23/2009, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U3 kernel 2.6.18-128.el5 for x86_64). Source: Intel internal testing TR1011A. Score of workloads: 91 GFlops.New Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 146 GFlops.
BLACKSCHOLES*: Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 18.74 seconds.New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 11.51 seconds.
Xeon 5600 5 Month Single Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back Up
5 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Single Core Intel® Xeon® 3.80 with 2M L2 Cache and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 15x. Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon Processor 3.80Ghz with 2M L2
Cache, 800 FSB, 8x1GB DDR2-400 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances
New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances
Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
top related