influence of biochar and diversified cropping systems on soil physical and chemical properties -...

Post on 16-Jan-2017

329 Views

Category:

Environment

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Influence of Biochar and Diversified Cropping Systems on Soil Physical and Chemical

Properties

Debbie Aller, David Laird, Ross Mazur, Ken Moore, Roger Hintz

SWCS conference- July 28th 2015

1

2

• Increasing energy demands

• Bioenergy production impacts on soil and water quality (Hatfield, 2015)

• Alternative cropping systems • small grains• perennial grasses• biochar amendments

Rationale

3

Biochar

Carbon sequestration

Plant pathogens

Crop yields

GHG emissions

Microbial activity

Soil fertility

Nutrient retention

Soil moisture

Photo credit: http://biochar.ucdavis.edu

4

• Long-Term Rotation Plots

• Sorenson Farm- Boone County, IA

Study Site

• Established in 2006• CRBD with split plots• Biochar – 10 tons/ac• 2 biochar ages (2012, 2013)• Biomass, yield, and soil data

• 5 cropping rotations • Continuous corn• Corn, soy, corn, soy, corn, soy• Corn, soy, triticale/soy, corn,

soy, triticale/soy• Corn, corn, corn/SG, SG, SG, SG• Continuous switchgrass

5

Background

Goal Hypotheses

6

• Determine the effect of biochar, biochar age, and cropping system on soil physical and chemical properties.

• Crop rotations that include triticale, switchgrass, and biochar additions will impact soil quality

• Biochar age will impact soil quality

Lab AnalysisPhysical Properties

• Saturated hydraulic conductivity• Solute transport• Gravimetric water content • Bulk density• Porosity

Chemical Properties• pH and EC • Total C/Total N • C/N ratio

7

Results

• Biochar decreased soil ρb compared with no biochar controls. • No effect of biochar age• Continuous switchgrass had a decreased ρb similar to biochar

amended plots

8

Cont Corn Corn-Soy Corn-Soy-Tricale Corn-Swg Cont Swg

Rotation

Bul

k D

ensi

ty (g

/cm

3)

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6No biocharBiochar 1 yearBiochar 2 year

No biocharBiochar 1 yearBiochar 2 year

A B AB A B No biocharBiochar 1 yearBiochar 2 yeara

b b

a

b b

a

bb

a

b b

Cont Corn Corn-Soy Corn-Soy-Triticale Corn-Swg Cont Swg

Rotation

Bul

k D

ensi

ty (g

/cm

3 )

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

9

Cont Corn Corn-Soy Corn-Soy-Tricale Corn-Swg Cont Swg

Rotation

Gra

vity

Dra

ined

Wat

er C

onte

nt (g

/g)

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

No biocharBiochar 1 yearBiochar 2 year

ResultsB A B B B No biochar

Biochar 1 yearBiochar 2 year

b

aa

a a a

a

a a

b

bb

Cont Corn Corn-Soy Corn-Soy-Triticale Corn-Swg Cont Swg

Rotation

Gra

vim

etric

Wat

er C

onte

nt (g

/g)

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

• Gravimetric water content was greater for treatments with biochar compared to no biochar.

10

Cont Corn Corn-Soy Corn-Soy-Tricale Corn-Swg Cont Swg

Rotation

C:N

Rat

io (%

/%)

8

10

12

14

16

18No biocharBiochar 1 yearBiochar 2 year

No biocharBiochar 1 yearBiochar 2 year

NSResults

b

a

a aa

a

bb b

a

a

a

Cont Corn Corn-Soy Corn-Soy-Triticale Corn-Swg Cont Swg

Rotation

C:N

Rat

io (%

/%)

8

10

12

14

16

18

• Soil C/N ratio increased with biochar amendment compared to no biochar controls

• No effect of biochar age

11

Cont Corn Corn-Soy Corn-Soy-Tricale Corn-Swg Cont Swg

Rotation

pH

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0No biocharBiochar 1 yearBiochar 2 year

A A A B B No biocharBiochar 1 yearBiochar 2 year

a a aa

a

a a

ab

b

b b

Cont Corn Corn-Soy Corn-Soy-Triticale Corn-Swg Cont Swg

Rotation

pH

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

• Soil pH increased with biochar addition compared with no biochar controls

• Soil pH lower in switchgrass rotations compared to other rotations

Results

12

Results

• Cropping rotation, biochar presence, and age of biochar appear to have minimal effects on solute transport

• Saturated hydraulic conductivity was highly variable; no differences among treatments

• Biochar • Decreased soil bulk density• Increased gravimetric water content, porosity, soil C/N ratio, and

pH• No effect on EC

• No effect of cropping rotation, biochar presence, and age of biochar on solute transport

• Continuous switchgrass rotation had a similar impact as biochar on soil bulk density and pH

• No difference of biochar age on soil physical and chemical properties 13

Conclusions

Thank you and Questions?

14

top related