ilc positron production and capturing studies: update

ILC Positron Production and Capturing Studies: Update

Wei Gai, Wanming Liu and Kwang-Je Kim

Posipol Workshop, Orsay, France

May 23-25, 2007

Work performed for the ILC e+ collaboration(SLAC, LLNL, RAL, CCRL, Cornell, KEK)

2Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Outline

1. Undulator Based Scheme with OMD Simulation Update

2. Spinning target in the OMD field and beam dynamics.

3. Alternative Approaches Toward Beam Capturing Studies: Quarter Wave Transformer Lithium Lens

4. Summary

3Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

1. The Undulator Based ILC e+ system Simulation Update

4Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

AMD profile and Pre-Accelerator Filed Map Used in the Simulation

AMD field:5T-0.25T in 50cm

Accelerating gradient in pre-accelerator: 12 MV/m for first 6 m, 10 MV/m for next 6 m and 8.9 MV/m for the rest.

5Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Positron yields from different undulator parameters

  BCD UK I UK II UK III Cornell I Cornell II Cornell III

Period (mm) 10.0 11.5 11.0 10.5 10.0 12.0 7

K 1.00 0.92 0.79 0.64 0.42 0.72 0.3

Field on Axis (T) 1.07 0.86 0.77 0.65 0.45 0.64 0.46

Beam aperture (mm)

Not Defined 5.85 5.85 5.85 8.00 8.00

First Harmonic Energy (MeV)

10.7 10.1 12.0 14.4 18.2 11.7 28

Yield(Low Pol, 10m drift)

~2.4 ~1.37 ~1.12 ~0.86 ~0.39 ~0.75 ~0.54

Yield(Low Pol, 500m drift)

~2.13 ~1.28 ~1.08 ~0.83 ~0.39 ~0.7 ~0.54

Yield(60% Pol)

~1.1 ~0.7 ~0.66 ~0.53 ~0.32 ~0.49 ~0.44

Target: 1.42cm thick Titanium AT 5 GeV beam energy

6Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Photon Number Spectrum

Number of photons per e- per 1m undulator:Old BCD: 2.578UK1: 1.946; UK2: 1.556; UK3: 1.107Cornell1: 0.521; Cornell2: 1.2; Cornell3: 0.386

7Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Photon Spectrum and Polarization of ILC baseline undulator

Results of photon number spectrum and polarization characteristic of ILC undulator are given here as examples. The parameter of ILC undulator is K=1, u=1cm and the energy of electron beam is 150GeV.

Figure1. Photon Number spectrum and polarization characteristics of ILC undulator up to the 9th harmonic. Only those have energy closed to critical energy of its corresponding harmonics have higher polarization

8Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Initial Polarization of Positron beam at Target exit(K=0.92 u=1.15)

9Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Initial Pol. Vs Energy of Captured Positron Beam

10Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Yield contribution from different harmonics

The contribution from harmonics will change with the length of drift between undulator and target. The result showing here is when drift length at ~ 100 m.

For longer drift, the contribution from 1st harmonic will increase and contribution from high order harmonics will decrease.

11Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Non-immersed/Partially Immersed Target

For cases with non-immersed target, the yield varies with the ramp length d.

For Partially immersed target, the yield also varies with the Bz at z=0.

Ramp up from 0 to 7T and has 1st order continuity at the joint point.

5T-0.25T, 50cm

ramp length

Since the dragging force exerted on target is proportional to Bz^2 on the target, a partially immersed target can lower the power requirement on driving the target while maintaining a reasonable yield.

12Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Normalized Yield as a Function of the Ramp Length

We would like to have the ramp as short as possible to minimize the lost of yield

Yield is normalized to the yield of immersed case

13Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

2. Spinning target in the OMD field and beam dynamics.

1m

6cm

1.4cm

Typical simulation result: streamlines of solenoidal magnetic field (in simulation we consider returning flux – principal difference from the setup with magnet)

Color: induced magnetic field (produced by eddy currents) at some frequency of rotation, ω.

Solenoid positioned at 0.95m

Outer domainUpper solenoid is not pictured

Full domain

14Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 500 1000 1500

Power, kWatt

RPM

σ=3e6, dr=1.5cm

magnet aperture:

12cm 6cm 3cm

Results for σ=3e6, dr=1.5cm, 5Tesla

15Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Bx and By components, a deflection force on the beam.

Color – By

Arrows {Bx, By}

The level of transverse (to the beam) components is one order lower than the z-component

Plotted 5mm from the surface of the target at 980rpms

tesla

16Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007Inside targetm

Tes

la

100 980 1735 3367

(critical)

rpms:

Total z-field

Frequency study of total field

17

Initial x-x’ of captured positrons

Induced field kicked some positrons out but also kicked some in. The lost of yield is only ~5%( from ~1.27 down to ~1.20) for conductivity of 3e6. No noticeable changes in e+ yield for target with conductivity of 1.5e6. Sine the titanium alloy has a conductivity of 0.56e6, so from beam dynamic point of view, the eddy current has no noticeable effect.

18Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

3.a. Quarter wave transformer simulation

a short lens with a high magnetic field and a long solenoidal magnetic field.

Field profile of quarter wave transformer

19Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Bulking FocusingMatching

Magnetic field profile: Superposition of two field maps.

20Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

On axis Bz profile

Scale and combine the field maps and do beam dynamic simulation using PARMELA. Tracking e+ upto ~125MeV

Accelerator begins

21Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Conditions and assumptions

Combine the field maps and then do beam dynamic simulation using PARMELA. Tracking e+ up to ~125MeV

B field is fixed at 0.5T after quarter wave transformer. The first Linac section starts at 20cm as in RDR. The longitudinal center of target is the center between

focusing and bucking solenoids. The capture efficiency is calculated at end of the TAP,

~125MeV, using phase cut +/- 7.5 degrees, Energy cut 50MeV. For reference, the capture efficiency calculated using same cut for case with OMD as 5T-0.5 in 20cm, we have ~35% for immersed case and ~26% for non-immersed case

22Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Capture efficiency as function of length of focusing solenoid.Max B field on axis is ~1T. Gap between bucking and focusing is at 2cm. Separation between focusing and matching is 0.

23Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Capture as function of focusing field

Colors represent different thickness of the focusing solenoid.The thinner focusing solenoid has better performance.

24Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Capture efficiency with only 0.5T background solenoid

Bz field goes up from 0 to 0.5T in ~8cm

25Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

3.b. Schematic Layout and Conditions for Lithium Lens Simulation

Target

Lithium lens

0.5T Backgroud Bz field

Normal conducting linac

from undulator

Target: 0.4 rl, Ti and W23Re

Undulator compared :

K=0.92,u=1.15

K=0.3, u=0.7Yield and capture efficiency were calculated at ~125MeVGradient and aperture of linac are in comply with RDR

Variables are length and driving current of lithium lens.

26Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

3. b. Capturing Study Using Lithium Lens

0 2 4 6 8 100

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

r (cm)

B

(T)

Current = 200KACurrent = 1MA

TargetLi Lens

Preaccelerator

Li lens field map

27Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Yield calculated at ~125MeV as a Function of the Length of Lithium Lens

Acceptance window: phase +/-7.50, E=50MeV, x+y<=0.09m.rad

For reference: yield for new baseline undulator calculated at 5GeV is ~1.28, it’s yield calculated at 125MeV is 1.44 here.

undulatormathroughingPassbeamdriveGeVtheinsElectronofNum

WindowCapturinginPositronsofNumYield

100150.

.

~1.44

1.96

0.68

Lithium lens current: 200KA

The drift to target for K=0.3, u=0.7 is chosen to be 10m to maximize it’s yield. For other twos, the drift to target is 450m.

28Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Acceptance window: phase +/-7.50, E=50MeV, x+y<=0.09m.rad

Lithium lens current: 200KA

Capture Efficiency Calculated at ~125MeV as a Function of the Length of Lithium Lens

100.

.

rgettatheoffcamepositronofNum

windowcapturinginpositonsofNumiciencyCaptureEff

The drift to target for K=0.3, u=0.7 is chosen to be 10m to maximize it’s yield. For other twos, the drift to target is 450m.

29Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007

Summary

Systematic e+ capturing studies performed. Various options considered.

Will integrate these studies into the EDR works.

Thank you.