ilc positron production and capturing studies: update
DESCRIPTION
ILC Positron Production and Capturing Studies: Update. Wei Gai, Wanming Liu and Kwang-Je Kim Posipol Workshop, Orsay, France May 23-25, 2007. Work performed for the ILC e+ collaboration (SLAC, LLNL, RAL, CCRL, Cornell, KEK). Outline. Undulator Based Scheme with OMD Simulation Update - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ILC Positron Production and Capturing Studies: Update
Wei Gai, Wanming Liu and Kwang-Je Kim
Posipol Workshop, Orsay, France
May 23-25, 2007
Work performed for the ILC e+ collaboration(SLAC, LLNL, RAL, CCRL, Cornell, KEK)
2Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Outline
1. Undulator Based Scheme with OMD Simulation Update
2. Spinning target in the OMD field and beam dynamics.
3. Alternative Approaches Toward Beam Capturing Studies: Quarter Wave Transformer Lithium Lens
4. Summary
3Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
1. The Undulator Based ILC e+ system Simulation Update
4Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
AMD profile and Pre-Accelerator Filed Map Used in the Simulation
AMD field:5T-0.25T in 50cm
Accelerating gradient in pre-accelerator: 12 MV/m for first 6 m, 10 MV/m for next 6 m and 8.9 MV/m for the rest.
5Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Positron yields from different undulator parameters
BCD UK I UK II UK III Cornell I Cornell II Cornell III
Period (mm) 10.0 11.5 11.0 10.5 10.0 12.0 7
K 1.00 0.92 0.79 0.64 0.42 0.72 0.3
Field on Axis (T) 1.07 0.86 0.77 0.65 0.45 0.64 0.46
Beam aperture (mm)
Not Defined 5.85 5.85 5.85 8.00 8.00
First Harmonic Energy (MeV)
10.7 10.1 12.0 14.4 18.2 11.7 28
Yield(Low Pol, 10m drift)
~2.4 ~1.37 ~1.12 ~0.86 ~0.39 ~0.75 ~0.54
Yield(Low Pol, 500m drift)
~2.13 ~1.28 ~1.08 ~0.83 ~0.39 ~0.7 ~0.54
Yield(60% Pol)
~1.1 ~0.7 ~0.66 ~0.53 ~0.32 ~0.49 ~0.44
Target: 1.42cm thick Titanium AT 5 GeV beam energy
6Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Photon Number Spectrum
Number of photons per e- per 1m undulator:Old BCD: 2.578UK1: 1.946; UK2: 1.556; UK3: 1.107Cornell1: 0.521; Cornell2: 1.2; Cornell3: 0.386
7Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Photon Spectrum and Polarization of ILC baseline undulator
Results of photon number spectrum and polarization characteristic of ILC undulator are given here as examples. The parameter of ILC undulator is K=1, u=1cm and the energy of electron beam is 150GeV.
Figure1. Photon Number spectrum and polarization characteristics of ILC undulator up to the 9th harmonic. Only those have energy closed to critical energy of its corresponding harmonics have higher polarization
8Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Initial Polarization of Positron beam at Target exit(K=0.92 u=1.15)
9Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Initial Pol. Vs Energy of Captured Positron Beam
10Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Yield contribution from different harmonics
The contribution from harmonics will change with the length of drift between undulator and target. The result showing here is when drift length at ~ 100 m.
For longer drift, the contribution from 1st harmonic will increase and contribution from high order harmonics will decrease.
11Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Non-immersed/Partially Immersed Target
For cases with non-immersed target, the yield varies with the ramp length d.
For Partially immersed target, the yield also varies with the Bz at z=0.
Ramp up from 0 to 7T and has 1st order continuity at the joint point.
5T-0.25T, 50cm
ramp length
Since the dragging force exerted on target is proportional to Bz^2 on the target, a partially immersed target can lower the power requirement on driving the target while maintaining a reasonable yield.
12Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Normalized Yield as a Function of the Ramp Length
We would like to have the ramp as short as possible to minimize the lost of yield
Yield is normalized to the yield of immersed case
13Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
2. Spinning target in the OMD field and beam dynamics.
1m
6cm
1.4cm
Typical simulation result: streamlines of solenoidal magnetic field (in simulation we consider returning flux – principal difference from the setup with magnet)
Color: induced magnetic field (produced by eddy currents) at some frequency of rotation, ω.
Solenoid positioned at 0.95m
Outer domainUpper solenoid is not pictured
Full domain
14Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 500 1000 1500
Power, kWatt
RPM
σ=3e6, dr=1.5cm
magnet aperture:
12cm 6cm 3cm
Results for σ=3e6, dr=1.5cm, 5Tesla
15Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Bx and By components, a deflection force on the beam.
Color – By
Arrows {Bx, By}
The level of transverse (to the beam) components is one order lower than the z-component
Plotted 5mm from the surface of the target at 980rpms
tesla
16Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007Inside targetm
Tes
la
100 980 1735 3367
(critical)
rpms:
Total z-field
Frequency study of total field
17
Initial x-x’ of captured positrons
Induced field kicked some positrons out but also kicked some in. The lost of yield is only ~5%( from ~1.27 down to ~1.20) for conductivity of 3e6. No noticeable changes in e+ yield for target with conductivity of 1.5e6. Sine the titanium alloy has a conductivity of 0.56e6, so from beam dynamic point of view, the eddy current has no noticeable effect.
18Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
3.a. Quarter wave transformer simulation
a short lens with a high magnetic field and a long solenoidal magnetic field.
Field profile of quarter wave transformer
19Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Bulking FocusingMatching
Magnetic field profile: Superposition of two field maps.
20Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
On axis Bz profile
Scale and combine the field maps and do beam dynamic simulation using PARMELA. Tracking e+ upto ~125MeV
Accelerator begins
21Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Conditions and assumptions
Combine the field maps and then do beam dynamic simulation using PARMELA. Tracking e+ up to ~125MeV
B field is fixed at 0.5T after quarter wave transformer. The first Linac section starts at 20cm as in RDR. The longitudinal center of target is the center between
focusing and bucking solenoids. The capture efficiency is calculated at end of the TAP,
~125MeV, using phase cut +/- 7.5 degrees, Energy cut 50MeV. For reference, the capture efficiency calculated using same cut for case with OMD as 5T-0.5 in 20cm, we have ~35% for immersed case and ~26% for non-immersed case
22Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Capture efficiency as function of length of focusing solenoid.Max B field on axis is ~1T. Gap between bucking and focusing is at 2cm. Separation between focusing and matching is 0.
23Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Capture as function of focusing field
Colors represent different thickness of the focusing solenoid.The thinner focusing solenoid has better performance.
24Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Capture efficiency with only 0.5T background solenoid
Bz field goes up from 0 to 0.5T in ~8cm
25Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
3.b. Schematic Layout and Conditions for Lithium Lens Simulation
Target
Lithium lens
0.5T Backgroud Bz field
Normal conducting linac
from undulator
Target: 0.4 rl, Ti and W23Re
Undulator compared :
K=0.92,u=1.15
K=0.3, u=0.7Yield and capture efficiency were calculated at ~125MeVGradient and aperture of linac are in comply with RDR
Variables are length and driving current of lithium lens.
26Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
3. b. Capturing Study Using Lithium Lens
0 2 4 6 8 100
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
r (cm)
B
(T)
Current = 200KACurrent = 1MA
TargetLi Lens
Preaccelerator
Li lens field map
27Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Yield calculated at ~125MeV as a Function of the Length of Lithium Lens
Acceptance window: phase +/-7.50, E=50MeV, x+y<=0.09m.rad
For reference: yield for new baseline undulator calculated at 5GeV is ~1.28, it’s yield calculated at 125MeV is 1.44 here.
undulatormathroughingPassbeamdriveGeVtheinsElectronofNum
WindowCapturinginPositronsofNumYield
100150.
.
~1.44
1.96
0.68
Lithium lens current: 200KA
The drift to target for K=0.3, u=0.7 is chosen to be 10m to maximize it’s yield. For other twos, the drift to target is 450m.
28Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Acceptance window: phase +/-7.50, E=50MeV, x+y<=0.09m.rad
Lithium lens current: 200KA
Capture Efficiency Calculated at ~125MeV as a Function of the Length of Lithium Lens
100.
.
rgettatheoffcamepositronofNum
windowcapturinginpositonsofNumiciencyCaptureEff
The drift to target for K=0.3, u=0.7 is chosen to be 10m to maximize it’s yield. For other twos, the drift to target is 450m.
29Posipol Meeting, LAL, Orsay, France, May 23 – 25, 2007
Summary
Systematic e+ capturing studies performed. Various options considered.
Will integrate these studies into the EDR works.
Thank you.