hydrologic cycle – will it remain stationary? · 2012-08-16 · hydrologic & environmental...

Post on 18-Jun-2020

2 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Hydrologic Cycle – will it remain stationary?

Primary Variables of interest:

Temperature

Precipitation

Evapotranspiration

Groundwater/Surface Watre

Saltwater Intrusion

Implications for: Water Management, Natural

Systems

Energy

Agriculture

Tourism, Transportation

Health

SOLAR RADIATION

Evaluation of Downscaled Climate Model Information for FloridaJayantha Obeysekera (‘Obey’)Chief Modeler, SFWMDAffiliate Research Professor, CES, FAU

Jayantha Obeysekera (‘Obey’)Chief Modeler, SFWMDAffiliate Research Professor, CES, FAU

Hydrology of the Everglades in the Context of Climate Change Workshop March 29-30, 2012, FAU Davie Campus

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Research publications

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Everglades Restoration – Will traditional planning approach work?

Natural System Managed System CERP

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

General Circulation Models

(GCMs)

Observed Climate Data

Is there evidence that climate is changing in

Florida? How well are south Florida’s climate and

teleconnectionsrepresented by climate

models?

How do climate projections affect water resources management?

Simulation of Late 20th Century

21st Century Climate

Projections

Downscale (Statistical & Dynamical) global information to regional information

Using Climate Change Information

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Climate Projection UncertaintiesIn

tern

alVa

riabi

lity

Gen

eral

Cir

cula

tion

Mod

elDownscaling

Ice

Shee

t Dyn

amic

s

Scenarios

GCM(IPCC, 2007)

Statistical

Dynamical

B1 A1T B2 A1B A2 A1FI

1.1-2.9 (○C)

1.4-3.8 (○C)

1.4-3.8 (○C)

1.7-4.4 (○C)

2.0-5.4 (○C)

2.4-6.4(○C)

0.18-0.38 (m)

0.20-0.45 (m)

0.20-0.43 (m)

0.21-0.48 (m)

0.23-0.51 (m)

0.26- 0.59 (m)

BCM2

C

onst

ruct

ed A

nalo

gues

(CA

)

Bia

s Cor

rect

ion

and

Spat

ial

Dow

nsca

ling

(BC

SD)

W

eath

er G

ener

ator

s

Reg

iona

l Clim

ate

Mod

els (

RC

Ms)

Climate Change Implications in Water Resources Planning: Scenario based approaches Use all models Model Culling?

CGHRCGMRCNCM3CSMK3ECHOGFGOALSGFCM20GFCM21GIAOMINCM3IPCM4MIHRMIMRMPEH5NCCCSMNCPCM

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

1

23

4

5

67 8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

1819

20

21

2223

24

25

2627

28

29

30

31

3233

34

35

3637

38

39

40

41

42

43

44 4546

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

5859

60

61

62

63

6465

66

67

68

1 WEST PALM BEACH INTERNA 2 DAYTONA BEACH INTL AP 3 INGLIS 3 E 4 SAINT LEO 5 VENUS 6 DOWLING PARK 1 W 7 PENSACOLA REGIONAL AP 8 JACKSONVILLE INTL AP 9 MARINELAND 10 MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AP 11 ST PETERSBURG 12 MELBOURNE WFO 13 MOORE HAVEN LOCK 1 14 TAMIAMI TRAIL 40 MI BEN 15 LYNNE 16 ORTONA LOCK 2 17 PARRISH 18 PORT MAYACA S L CANAL 19 ST LUCIE NEW LOCK 1 20 LAKELAND 21 PENNSUCO 5 WNW 22 CLEWISTON 23 CANAL POINT GATE 5 24 FOLKSTON GA25 KEY WEST INTL AP 26 NICEVILLE 27 TALLAHASSEE WSO AP 28 BELLE GLADE HRCN GT 4 29 LISBON 30 NORTH NEW RVR CANAL 2 31 GRACEVILLE 1 SW 32 BRISTOL 33 FARGO GA34 APALACHICOLA AIRPORT

35 VENICE 36 BOCA RATON 37 FORT MYERS PAGE FIELD A 38 COOLIDGE GA39 WOODRUFF DAM 40 MIAMI WSO CITY 41 RAIFORD STATE PRISON 42 VERO BEACH 4 SE 43 BLACKMAN 44 BROOKSVILLE 7 SSW 45 ORLANDO INTL AP 46 ORLANDO WSO AIRPORT 47 LIGNUMVITAE KEY 48 LOXAHATCHEE 49 GRADY 50 OKEECHOBEE 51 LAMONT 6 WNW 52 ORANGE CITY 53 BRANFORD 54 GAINESVILLE 3 WSW 55 BROOKSVILLE CHIN HILL 56 CROSS CITY 2 WNW 57 KISSIMMEE 2 58 MONTICELLO 5 SE 59 PANAMA CITY 5 N 60 BAINBRIDGE GA61 TAMIAMI CANAL 62 BAINBRIDGE GA INTL PAPER63 VERO BEACH MUNI ARPT 64 PENSACOLA WB CITY 65 PANAMA CITY 2 66 VERNON 67 NORTH NEW RIVER CANAL 1 68 WAUSAU

-86 -84 -82 -80

2526

2728

2930

31

flx

fly

Alachua

Apopka

Arcadia

Avalon

Balm

Belle Glade

Bronson

Brooksville

Carrabelle

Citra

Clewiston

Dover

Fort Lau

Frostproof

Fort Pierce

Hastings

Homestead

Immokalee

Indian River

Jay

KenansvilleLake Alfred

Live Oak Macclenny

Marianna

Monticello

North Port

Ocklawaha

Okahumpka

Ona

Palmdale

Pierson

Putnam Hall

Quincy

Sebring

Umatilla

1 Alachua2 Apopka3 Arcadia4 Avalon5 Balm6 Belle Glade7 Bronson8 Brooksville9 Carrabelle10 Citra11 Clewiston12 Dover13 Fort Lauderdale14 Frostproof15 Fort Pierce16 Hastings17 Homestead18 Immokalee19 Indian River20 Jay21 Kenansville22 Lake Alfred23 Live Oak24 Macclenny25 Marianna26 Monticello27 North Port28 Ocklawaha29 Okahumpka30 Ona31 Palmdale32 Pierson33 Putnam Hall34 Quincy35 Sebring36 Umatilla

USGS map

FAWN

COAPS

USGS

UCF - extremes

PRISM

SFWMD

Validation Data

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

GCM Resolution (Land sea mask) in Florida

Uncertainties in GCM predictions due to:

Poor resolution – South Florida not even modeled in some GCMs; greater errors at smaller scales

From IPCC AR4-WG1, Ch. 8 - Simulation of tropical precipitation, ENSO, clouds and their response to climate change, etc.

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Statistically Downscaled Data for US (1/8 degree) – BCSD/BCCA methods

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

A2 Emissions Scenario

GFDL CCSMHADCM3link to European

Prudence

CGCM3

1971-2000 current 2040-2070 futureProvide boundary conditions

MM5Iowa State/PNNL

RegCM3UC Santa CruzICTP

CRCMQuebec,Ouranos

HADRM3Hadley Centre

RSMScripps

WRFNCAR/PNNL

CAM3Time slice

50km

GFDLTime slice

50 km

NARCCAP Scenario & Model Suite

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

GCM Skill for Florida

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Projected Temperature Change from AOGCMs (for 2050) – Posterior Distribution

•The vertical bars correspond to the percentiles, 5% and 95% of the posteriordistributions of temperature change for b1,a1b, and a2 scenarios (red, black and blue)

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Future Projections – Temperature & Precipitation

all modelsensemble mean

P

BCSD

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Change: Magnitude & Seasonality

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

Everglades

%Change in Mean Annual Precip.

Cha

nge

in M

ean

Ann

ual T

emp.

2041:2070 versus 1971:2000

b1A1bA2

BCSD

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Spatial Trends

Temperature

BCSD

Latitude increasing

PrecipitationLatitude increasing

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Changes in duration of “dog days” & “freezing temperatures”

Dog days – Mean Number of days average above 80º FHistorical

Change from1970-1999to 2040-2069

CGCM3-CRCM HADCM3-HRM3

Absolute ValueChange from1970-1999to 2040-2069

Freezing – Mean Number of days minimum below 32º F

Absolute ValueChange from1970-1999to 2040-2069

Change from1970-1999to 2040-2069

BCCA

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Temperature

NARCCAP

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Precipitation

NARCCAP

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

BiasTemperature

NARCCAP

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

BiasPrecipitation

NARCCAP

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

ChangeTemperature

NARCCAP

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

ChangePrecipitation

NARCCAP

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

ChangeTemperature

NARCCAP

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

ChangePrecipitation

NARCCAP

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Model skill: Precipitation Extremes (Rainfall Depth – Duration)

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

By 2050 (findings to date - may change as science evolves)

Variable Global ModelsStatistically

Downscaled Data Dynamically

Downscaled Data

Average Temperature

1 to 1.5ºC 1 to 2ºC 1.6 to 2.4ºC

Precipitation -10% to +10% -5% to +5% -3 to 6 inches

Reference Crop Evapotranspiration

3 to 6 inches*

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Water Supply ThreatsPrecipitation & Temperature Change Sensitivity

(2050 with Climate Change) minus 2050 (CERP with CC) minus CERP0

*Surface Ponding decrease > 0.3 feet

CC change: Precipitation decrease of 10% while potential evapotranspiration (PET) was estimated using an increase the daily temperature by 1.5°Celsius. The exact impact of global climate change on evapotranspiration is not known and therefore a simple temperature based method was used to estimate the change in solar radiation for computing PET

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Ocean Land Atmosphere Model (RAMAS) Team at RSMAS:

• Dr. Brian Soden

• Dr. Amy Clement

• Dr. Robert Walko

• Dr. Craig Mattocks

• Roque Vinicio Cespedes (MS student)

How will landusechanges affect micro-climate?

Global Model with local mesh

refinement

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Summary

Resolutions of GCMs inadequate to capture hydro-meteorology of Florida peninsulaSkills of models for regional climate

information may not be adequate, yet. More work is need to verify and improve the methods/models.Need to work together on a “unified set of

climate scenarios” for Florida.

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Questions?

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Extra slides

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Tropical Storms & Climate Change

Premature to conclude that human activities have had detectable impact on hurricane activity

Tropical cyclones to shift towards strong storms (2-11% intensity increase by 2100)

Decrease in global frequency of tropical cyclones (6-34%)

Increase in the frequency of the most intense cyclones

Increase in rainfall rate, 20% within 100 km of storm center

Knutson et. al, nature geoscience, 2010

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Natural Variability (Teleconnections)Rainfall vs. El Nino & La NinaRainfall patterns

Lake OkeechobeeInflow

Tropical storm patterns

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

What is OLAM?

• Ocean Land Atmosphere Model

• New, full-physics non-hydrostaticEarth System Model based onRegional Atmospheric ModelingSystem (RAMS)

• Unstructured grid (triangular orhexagonal mesh)

• Local mesh refinement instead ofnesting: two-way seamlesscommunication betweenregional/mesoscale and globalportions of grid domain throughconservative advection and turbulenttransport

35

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Florida - Main Observations

Hydrologic & Environmental Systems Modeling

number of wet days during the dry season –POR

May precipitation throughout the state –POR and especially post-1950. May be linked to changes in start of the wet season.

Urban heat island effect – urban (and drained) areas Tave and number of dog days for wet

(warm) season especially post-1950 Decrease in DTR ( Tmin > Tmax) Annual maximum of Tave and Tmin for all

seasons in POR and especially post-1950

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

GEV parameters of annual maxima

Location Scale Shape

Duration = 6-hours

Duration = 24 hours

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

BiasTemperature

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

ChangeTemperature

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

BiasPrecipitation

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

ChangePrecipitation

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Bias

Temperature

NARCCAP

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

Bias

Precipitation

NARCCAP

HYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELINGHYDROLOGIC & ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MODELING

at http://rcpm.ucar.edu

Regional Climate Change Projections from Multi-Model Ensembles (Tebaldi et al., 2008)

A Bayesian approach

Reward models with respect to BIAS (w.r.t. current climate) and CONVERGENCE (consensus on future projections)

23 Models, SRES scenarios A2(high), A1B (midrange), B1(low)

Posterior distribution of precipitation & temperature for each season & future decades

MODELLikelihood:Observed: X0 ~ N[μ, −λ0

-1]GCM (current): Xi ~ N[μ, −λi

-1]GCM(future): Yi ~ N[ν, −(θλi)-1]Priors:μ, ν ~ U(-∞,+ ∞ )λi ~ Γ (a,b), θi ~ Γ (c,d)

top related