dynamic positioning – finding a new position in the market

Post on 21-Feb-2017

215 Views

Category:

Engineering

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED

Dynamic Positioning – Finding a New Position in the MarketEuropean Dynamic Positioning Conference – 7 February 2017

1 18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED

AGENDA

2 18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED

• Brief History of DP

• New Capabilities

• The Dawn of Autonomy

• Manuvering systems - SmartPredict

• Into the Future

3

AGENDA

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED

DP – A BRIEF HISTORY

4 18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED5

HISTORY

• DP is first developed

• Quickly moves from operator assist to full DP

• Controllers shift from analog to digital

• The DP industry is born

1960’s

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED6

HISTORY

• Evolution

• First commercial DP systems emerge

• Modern Control theories introduced with mathematical modeling of the system

• Redundancy, feed forward and other concepts introduced

1970’s

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED7

HISTORY

• Downturn – But huge strides in computer technology were made affecting the next generation of DP’s

1980’s

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

• Rapidly evolving computer industry supported completely new DP capabilities

• New functions and added capabilities to take advantage of the new processor power

• Improved User Interfaces

1990-2000’s

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED8

HISTORY

• Growth turned to Downturn in classic offshore market

• Focus is shifting to evolution of other markets

2010’s

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED

DP TODAY

9 18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED10

HISTORY

• Jack-up Compensation – Wind Farms

• Gangway Compensation - Floatels

• Wave Feed-Forward

• Still just holding position

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED11

HISTORY

• Next Evolution – not just maintaining station, but true dynamic positioning - Better and smarter DP systems providing dynamic control

• Not just the track follow or target follow we have had for years

• Manuvering and…..AUTONOMY

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED

WHAT IS AUTONOMY?

12 18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED13

AUTONOMY

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

Level Description Steering, Acceleration,Deceleration

Monitoring OperatingEnvironment

Fallback For Dynamic Tasks

Example

Level 0 No AutomationFull time performance by the operator of all aspects of the dynamic task, even when enhanced by warning or intervention systems.

“Old-fashioned” car with no assistance, not even power steering or brakes

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED14

AUTONOMY

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

Level Description Steering, Acceleration,Deceleration

Monitoring OperatingEnvironment

Fallback For Dynamic Tasks

Example

Level 1 Operator AssistanceThe operator mode-specific execution by an operator assistance system of either steering or accel/decal using information about the operating environment and with the expectation that the human operator performs all remaining aspects of the dynamic operating task.

Standard cruise control or parking assist

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED15

AUTONOMY

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

Level Description Steering, Acceleration,Deceleration

Monitoring OperatingEnvironment

Fallback For Dynamic Tasks

Example

Level 2 Partial AutomationThe operator mode-specific execution by one or more operator assistance systems of both steering and accel/decal using information about the operating environment and with the expectation that the human operator performs all remaining aspects of the dynamic operating task.

Routing assist, radar based cruise control

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED16

AUTONOMY

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

Level Description Steering, Acceleration,Deceleration

Monitoring OperatingEnvironment

Fallback For Dynamic Tasks

Example

Level 3 Conditional AutomationThe operator mode-specific performance by an automated control system of all aspects of the dynamic operating task with the expectation that the human operator will respond appropriately to a request to intervene.

Autopilot

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED17

AUTONOMY

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

Level Description Steering, Acceleration,Deceleration

Monitoring OperatingEnvironment

Fallback For Dynamic Tasks

Example

Level 4 High AutomationThe operator mode-specific performance by an automated control system of all aspects of the dynamic operating task even if a human operator does not respond appropriately to a request to intervene.

Autonomous cars in operation today, specific cases, not capable of dynamic situation/terrain; urban automated driving.

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED18

AUTONOMY

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

Level Description Steering, Acceleration,Deceleration

Monitoring OperatingEnvironment

Fallback For Dynamic Tasks

Example

Level 5 Full/Complete AutomationThe operator mode-specific performance by an automated control system of all aspects of the dynamic operation under all operational and environmental conditions that can be managed by a human operator.

Fully autonomous cars able to deal with all operational and environmental issues without human intervention.

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED19

AUTONOMY

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

Level Description Steering, Acceleration,Deceleration

Monitoring OperatingEnvironment

Fallback For Dynamic Tasks

Level 0 No Automation

Level 1 Operator Assistance

Level 2 Partial Automation

Level 3 Conditional Automation

Level 4 High Automation

Level 5 Full/Complete automation

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED20

AUTONOMY

What is possible for ships today?

• Levels 0, 1 and 2 are already in operation

• Level 3 and above are not there yet• More elements need to be validated…especially Manuvering

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED

THE POTENTIAL OF THE FUTURE

21 18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED22

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

What if the captain could see into the future and know where his vessel would be?

• Existing trackpilots and autopilots simply plot a course and assume the ship follows it

• Could DP and ship handling be merged for predictive handling?

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED23

SMARTPREDICT

• Improves safety in manual mode operation

• Displays the vessel’s predicted future position and heading

• Advanced prediction based on all system inputs

• User configurable prediction time

SmartPredict

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED24

SMARTPREDICT

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED25

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

SmartPredict forms the basis to move beyond just maneuvering…

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

To remotely piloted ships similar to the UAV’s of the aircraft world.

Into automated procedures, like docking and then…

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED26

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

• Regulatory Input

• Public Concern

• More at stake than with Autos

Fully Autonomous Ships

18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

© Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED

THANK YOU FOR YOURATTENTION

Questions?

27 18 Mar 2016 [DP UI’s and DPO’s: The Right Level of Relationship/ M. Ford

top related