cloudy sky version of bird's broadband hourly clear sky ... · nrel/pr-581-40115. disclaimer...

Post on 21-Aug-2020

6 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

CLOUDY SKY VERSION OF BIRD'S BROADBAND HOURLY

CLEAR SKY MODEL

SOLAR 2006July 8-13, 2006 Denver, Colorado

Renewable Energy Key to Climate Recovery

Daryl R. MyersNational Renewable Energy Laboratory

1617 Cole Blvd Golden CO 80401

daryl_myers@nrel.gov

NREL/PR-581-40115

Disclaimer and Government License

This work has been authored by Midwest Research Institute (MRI) under Contract No. DE-AC36-99GO10337 with the U.S. Department of Energy (the “DOE”). The United States Government (the “Government”) retains and the publisher, by accepting the work for publication, acknowledges that the Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for Government purposes.

Neither MRI, the DOE, the Government, nor any other agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe any privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of the authors and/or presenters expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of MRI, the DOE, the Government, or any agency thereof.

AcknowledgmentsThe pioneering work of Dr. Richard Bird has stood the test of time, and still reverberates in the solar modeling community.

Dr. Richard E. Bird✭ 1 February 1942

–✝ 18 April 2002

This work is but an editing of his contribution.

Based on observed cloud cover data

Using a SIMPLE model

Produce “all sky” modeled hourly solar radiation

Objective:

Bird’s Clear Sky Model

8760 Hour Clear Sky Profile (Climatological Aerosol, Water, Ozone)

and Real Data

The (Long Standing) Problem--CloudsCloud Type?

Layers?

Height?

Thickness?

Density?

Distribution?

“Fuzzy” and AI Models: Require “training” with real data

Empirical: Measured solar data and cloud information

Stochastic:Need statistics!

Nielsen’s Irradiance Vs CC Reported by Ehnberg

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Zenith angle (90 - elevation)

Glo

bal I

rr. W

.m-2

0 Octa

1 Octa

2 Octa

3 Octa

4 Octa

5 Octa

6 Octa

7 Octa

8 Octa

Nielsen, L., et al. Net Incoming Radiation Estimated from Hourly Global Radiation and/or Cloud Observations. Journal of Climatology, I, p. 225-272, 1981 Ehnberg, J.S.G., and M.H.J. Bollen, Simulation of Global Solar Radiation Based on Cloud Observations, Solar Energy Vol 78, p. 157-162, 2005

Normalization

Normalized Cloud Transmittance Vs Z and CC

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Zenith Angle

Tra

nsm

issi

on r

elat

ive

to C

C=0

0 Octa

1 Octa

2 Octa

3 Octa

4 Octa

5 Octa

6 Octa

7 Octa

8 Octa

45° Z Normalized CC Transmittance

y = -0.0112x2 - 0.0016x + 1.0041

R2 = 0.9955

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Cloud Cover, Octa

Mea

n R

elat

ive

Glo

bal T

rans

mit

tanc

e

Let’s Try It with Real Data: 30 Sites, 2 Years Measured CC & Solar Data

National Climatic Data Center Integrated Surface Hourly (ISH) Online Data

• http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/mppsearch.html• http://www5.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/script/webcat.pl• http://hurricane.ncdc.noaa.gov/pls/plclimprod/poemain.accessrouter?datasetabbv=DS3505

Excel Model Implementation

FORTRAN Program Process 30 SitesINPUTSINPUTSLatitudeLongitudeYearMonthDay HourPressureAerosol OD @ 550 nmAOD @ 380 nmTotal Water VaporTotal OzoneAlbedo

Total Cloud Cover (8ths)

Hourly Mean Errors(ANNUAL)

MBE 23 Wm-2

-80 Wm-2 <MBE<+60 Wm-2

RMS ~ 133 Wm-2

MBE ~ - 7%, -32%<MBE<+17%

RMS ~ 40%

Mean Bias and RMS Monthly Hourly Averages 30 Sites

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

Site

Wm

-2 R

MS

-400

-350

-300

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

Wm

-2 M

BE

RMS

MBE

MBE PERCENTAvg = - 7%

1999 Albany NY

Bird All Sky Model Results

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360

Day of Year

Irrad

ianc

e W

/m2

G*tGN

Measured Global Hz

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360

Day of Year

Irra

dian

ce W

/m2

Global

June 1999 Albany NY

Albany 1999 Monthly Mean Hourly Bias Errors

MeasuredMonthly Hr Mean

ModeledMonthlyHr mean

MBE % of MEAS

Jan 45.4 40.4 -12.3Feb 99.0 91.1 -8.6Mar 133.0 157.0 15.3Apr 204.5 187.5 -9.1May 230.5 242.0 4.7Jun 271.2 266.9 -1.6Jul 269.2 260.0 -3.5Aug 214.7 210.3 -2.1Sep 173.8 164.5 -5.7Oct 99.6 91.6 -8.7Nov 75.7 77.9 2.7Dec 55.7 31.6 -76.3

TOTAL 1872.3 1820.9 -2.8

Seasonal Bias Errors (1999-2000)? From ?

NSRDB Daily Aerosol Optical Depth “Annual

Sine Curve”

Climatological (Long Term) Water Vapor

&Imprecision in

Model

Compare NSRDB/METSTAT Data and Cloudy Sky Model Results

• Selected 30 Years of Hourly Global Hz Irradiance, Total CC (10ths)

• Convert CC 10ths to Octas• Compute Bird Clear Sky Irradiance

– USE NSRDB (daily) aerosol, (hourly) water vapor

• Modify with Cloud Transmittance• Compare with NSRDB Results

– Remember: NSRDB hourly data are STATISTICAL for 95% of NSRDB—hour by hour matching is unlikely; but MONTHLY MEANS agree well with measured data

Mean Difference 1.6 Wm-2

Std Dev±93 Wm-2

Mean Difference -8 Wm-2

Std Dev±88 Wm-2

Port Arthur Texas & Evansville Indiana Hourly Simulation 30 Years

Modeled Global Horizontal G*tGN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Day (hour) of the Year

Glo

bal I

rrad

ianc

e W

m-2

• Very simple model to implement!

•Average -7% MBE (max ~ 25%) and 40% RMS errors

• Realistic model hourly solar radiation profiles

•Based on cloud cover observations for a wide variety of sites...

Summary

top related