analysis of the adviser-client relationship michael arnold – ombudsman, investments life insurance...

Post on 18-Jan-2016

215 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Analysis of the adviser-client relationship

• Michael Arnold – Ombudsman, Investments Life Insurance & Superannuation, FOS

Dick Viney – Ombudsman, Investments Life Insurance & Superannuation, FOS

Adj Professor Wes McMaster – www.wesmcmaster.com

Agenda

Introduction FOS Key issues in adviser - client relationship Other Feel free to ask questions at any stage

FOS Terms of Reference and process

Different TORs/process depending on whether we received dispute before or after 1 January 2010

1.

Registration

2.

Acceptance(inc jurisdictional

review)

3.

Early resolution

(via Case Manager/concil

iator)

4.

Outcome(via Recommendation/

Determination)

Complaints received pre and post Jan 2010 - process

1.

Initial enquiry(inc jurisdictional

review)

2.

Case Management/

conciliation

3.

Panel investigation

4.

Determination

Some key features of “old” and “new” Terms of Reference - jurisdiction

Complaints received pre 1 January 2010

Complaints received post 1 January 2010

Monetary limits (for financial products other than insurance)

$150k per claim,(excludes interest)

$500k per claim – compensation capped at $150k per claim(from Jan 2012 this will increase to $280k per claim)(excludes interest)

Consequential/indirect loss

Not available Consequential loss – up to $3k

Non-financial loss No compensation available for pain and suffering

Non-financial loss – up to $3k

Time limits Within 6 years Within 6 years or within 2 years of receiving final “IDR response” (as defined)

Some key features of “old” and “new” Terms of Reference - process

Complaints received pre 1 January 2010

Complaints received post 1 January 2010

Time allowed for IDR complaint

45 days in most cases 45 days in most cases

Outcome Adjudicator or Ombudsman issues final decision

• In most cases, a Panel Case Manager issues Recommendation

• If appealed, Ombudsman or Panel issues Determination

Review Matter can return to decision maker(s) on certain procedural fairness grounds

Recommendations can be appealed to a final Determination by either party

Client engagement “Know your client” “Know your product” Formulating advice Delivery of advice Implementation of advice Reviews

Key stages in adviser-client relationship

AFSL liability issues: advisers acting without knowledge/approval of licensee

When investments are frozen Causation and loss The future Recent decisions of note At FOS

Other issues

www.fos.org.au (with search facility for determinations)

www.wesmcmaster.com

Further resources

top related