analysis of k.465 first movement

Post on 05-Sep-2015

222 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Analysis_of_K.465_First_MovementAnalysis_of_K.465_First_Movement.pdf Analysis_of_K.465_First_Movement.pdf

TRANSCRIPT

  • Feldmahler1

    Feldmahler

    02November2006

    AnAnalysisoftheFirstMovementofMozart'sK.465inRelationtotheIdeaofRhetoricandOration

    I. Introduction

    While there are several analytical studies of the famous introduction to Mozart's Dissonant

    QuartetK.465,fewofthesestudieselaborateontherelevanceofthisintroductiontotherestofthefirst

    movement.Yet,ifwearetofollowtheideaofmusicasrhetoricaspropoundedbyEnlightenmentwriters

    withregardstoinstrumentalmusic,themostnaturalandcrucialfollowupanalysiswouldbetoseehow

    theideasinthisextraordinaryintroductionarestatedandelaborateduponintherestofthepiece.An

    notableexceptiontothisisMarkEvanBonds,whodidindeeddoabriefanalysisofK.465inhisbook.

    Yet,notonlyisitextremelybrief,italsoseemstomissthemainideaofthepieceitself,whichrather

    weakensthisexampleinhisargumentfortheideaofrhetoricinclassicalmusic.

    Toremedythisanalyticaldefect,wewillfirstbrieflydiscussanddefinethisideaofrhetoricwhich

    wearetryingtomeasureK.465against.Wewillthenengageinadetailedanalysisofthefirstmovement

    ofK.465,andfindoutwhethertheseideasalsoapplytoK.465.

    II.TheIdeaofRhetoricinInstrumentalMusic

    Kochwrote inhis MusikalischesLexikon of1802 that rhetoric is thenamegivenbysome

    teachersofmusic tothatbodyofknowledgebelongingtocompositionbywhichindividualmelodic

    sectionsareunitedintoawhole,accordingtoadefinitepurpose(qtd.inBonds53),or,aslaterother

    writersput it, unity invariety(Bonds98). Indeed,asBondsnotes,rhetoric inmost18thcentury

  • Feldmahler2

    writingsiscloselytiedtobroaderconceptualissuesoflargescaleform(Bonds53).

    Andinthisissueoflargescaleform,the Hauptsatz occupiesadominantposition.Kirnberger

    defines Hauptsatz asaperiodwithinamusicalworkthatincorporatestheexpressionandthewhole

    essenceofthemelody(qtd.inBonds94).TheimplicationsofthisideaofaHauptsatzseemstwofold.

    Ononehand,itsupportstheideaofunityinvariety,whichBondscallsoneofthemostimportant

    aestheticdoctrinesoftheeighteenthcentury(Bonds98).Ontheotherhand,italsosupportstoacertain

    extenttheideaofmusicasoration,1 inthesensethatthe Hauptsatz canbeseenasthethesisofthe

    oration;andsinceideas...flowoutoftheHauptsatz(Marpurg,qtd.inBonds102),therestofthepiece

    canalsoconceivablybeparalleledwiththerestoftheoration,allofwhichisinsomesortofrelationto

    theHauptsatz.Morespecifically,Matthesonarguesthatanentiremusicalworkmustobservethesame

    six parts that are normally prescribed for the orator, namely: the introduction, the narration, the

    proposition, the proof, the refutation, and the closing, otherwise known as: Exordium, Narratio,

    Propositio,Confirmatio,Confutatio,andPeroratio(Bonds8586).Herewemustnotethedichotomy

    betweenthegeneral(unityinvariety)andthespecific(structureofanoration).Yetthisissurelyfar

    fromablackandwhitesituation;rather,itcanbeseenasaspectrum,withthegeneralatoneend,andthe

    specificattheotherend.

    ItisindeedfromthisvantagepointofrhetoricthatweapproachtheanalysisofK.465,toconfirm,

    first,whetherthepiececonformstotheideaofrhetoricatall,andifitdoes,thedegreetowhichit

    conformswiththespecificintheideaofrhetoric.However,asBondsnotes,one'sevaluationofthe

    1 BondsnotesthatMatthesoncallsthemusicalworkaKlangrede,anorationinnotes(Bonds85).

  • Feldmahler3

    relationshipamong thematic ideas in any individualworkormovementdepends largelyuponone's

    broaderbeliefin(orskepticismtoward)theverylegitimacyofsuchconnections(Bonds101).Iwillnot

    pretendthatIamcompletelyneutralonthissubject,butwillinsteadallowtheanalysistospeakforitself.

    III. TheIdea2

    Bondsnotesthattherearetwomotifs,whichhecallsmotifsaandb,3thatareexpandedupon

    andvaried throughout themovement, yet hefails tonote thecrucial importanceof therelationship

    betweenthetwomotifsontheentirepiece.Indeed,ifthereisoneIdeathatgovernstheentiremovement,

    itwouldbethisrelationship,andnotthetwomotifsthemselves.Thisisnottosaythatthetwomotifsare

    trivial(theyarenot),butratherthatthetwomotifsarethemselvesmerelymanifestations,ratherthanthe

    essenceof,thisIdea.

    ThemostobviousmanifestationofthisIdeaisindeedquitedirect:theamountofsheercontrast

    between the introduction and the movement proper is astounding. Not only do we emerge from

    dissonanceintoconsonance,minorintomajor,butthereisalsoapeculiarchangefromameterto

    commontime.This wealthofcontrastsbetweeneven thegeneral senseof the introductionand the

    movementpropershouldgivehintsastotheidentityofthisfundamentalIdeathatMozartattemptsto

    expoundinthismovement(ifnottheentirework).AsSimonKeefepointsout,theanalogyofdarkness

    tolightisacommondescriptionofthecontrastbetweentheintroductionandthemovementproperin

    2 WhileKirnbergernotesthattheHauptsatz isgenerallycalledthe'theme'(Bonds94),wewillusethewordIdeaasasynonymfortheHauptsatzinthefollowinganalysistoavoidconfusion.

    3 AccordingtoBonds,motifaisadescendingline,andbanascendingline(Bonds102103).Notethatforthepurposesofthisanalysistherhythmofthemotifwillnotbeconsidered,inordertoconcentrateonthemotif,andavoidanoverlybroadscopeofdiscussion.

  • Feldmahler4

    secondaryliterature(90).Itisalso,however,ametaphorthatseemstofitwiththeIdeaverywell.

    Itisalsointhecontextofthiscontrastbetweendarknessandlightthatwecanfullyunderstandthe

    relationshipbetweenBonds'stwomotifs.Indeed,toevensaythattherearetwomotifsthatgovernthe

    piecewouldbetocompletelymissthepoint,forthereisonlyonemotif.WhatBondscallsthebmotif

    istheantithesisoftheamotif:notonlyisittechnicallytheretrogradeorinversionofa,itistreated

    asanantithesisthroughoutthemovement,asweshallseeshortly.Anditispreciselythisthatdetermines

    theentirestructureofthepiece,renderingthenotionofanalyzingthepieceintermsofsonataform

    superficial,andonlyusefulinsofarasitgivesusthemostgeneralsenseofstructure.

    Itmustalsobenotedthatthismotifitselfisnotarbitrary.Itis,insofarastheIdeaisconcerned,the

    bestmotif.ForinboththisIdeaanditscorrespondingmotif,weseereligious/philosophicalinfluenceson

    music.Inmanywesternreligions(nottheleastofwhichbeingChristianity),weseemanyinstancesof

    dualism:forexample,heavenvs.hell,lightvs.darkness.Anotherparallelinthisdualismwouldbeascent

    vs.descent,andtheideaoftheascenttoheaven(orthelight)andthedescenttohell(ordarkness).When

    werealizethis,thereasonforthechoiceofthisparticularmotif(anditsantithesis)onwhichtoexpound

    theIdeabecomesobvious.

    IV.TheIntroductionofK.465

    NowthatwehaveageneralsenseoftheIdeathatdrivesthispiece,itisnecessarytofindouthow

    thisideastructurestheentirepiece,andwewillbeginthistaskbyexaminingtheintroductionitself.Due

    tothepopularityofthisintroductionwithmusictheorists,thereareavarietyofexcellentanalysisofthe

  • Feldmahler5

    harmonicimplicationsandcrossrelationsintheintroduction.4However,thisisnotthestyleofanalysis

    thatwewilltake,sinceweareinterestedmoreinthemotivicaspectoftheintroduction.5

    Bonds,amongmanyotherwriters,notedtheusageofthedescendingmotifinthechromaticcello

    linefromm.1tom.12.6However,thereisanotherlayerinthemusicthatisatleastasimportant;andthis

    wouldbethelinesofthethreeotherinstruments.Indeed,allofthemstartwithashortversionofthe

    descendingmotif, followed immediately by the ascendingmotif, which not only neatly ends that

    particularphrase,butalsolaysouttheIdea.Eventhecelloitselfalternatesbetweenthedescendingand

    ascendingmotifs:immediatelyaftertheendingalongexpositionofthedescendingmotifonm.12,the

    ascendingmotifisintroducedinm.13,onlytobecontradictedagainonebarlaterbythedescending

    motif.Duringthistime,theotherinstrumentshavenotbeenidle;thedensepolyphonyischalkfullof

    alternatingstatementsofbothascendinganddescendingmotifs,mostlyinastrongchromaticversionof

    themotifs.Allthiscomestoatemporaryhaltonm.16,wherethemusicentersintoalimbolikestate,

    untilaheavilymodifieddiatonicversionoftheascendingmotifappearsinthecelloinm.19.Yetanother

    versionoftheascendingmotifappearsinbothviolinsabarlater(m.20),andwhichalsobringsthe

    4 HereIreferthereadertoWilliamDeFotis,"Rehearings:Mozart,QuartetinC,K.465."19thCenturyMusic6.1(1982):3138,andSimonP.Keefe,"AnIntegrated'Dissonance':Mozart's'Haydn'QuartetsandtheSlowIntroductionofK.465."MozartJahrbuch2002(2002):87103.

    5 Aclarificationoftheexactmeaningsoftheascendinganddescendingmotifsisinorder.Itismoreaccuratetocallthemtheascendinganddescendingvariationsofthemotif,butisinconvenienthereduetothewordiness,andsoascendingmotifanddescendingmotifareusedinstead,eventhoughitisreallythesamemotif.Also,bothmeanascalarline(thestrongversionbeingchromaticandtheweakerdiatonic),anddoes not includearpeggios, unless it is a clearvariation of someversionof themotif (ex. thearpeggiatedvariationoftheversionoftheascendingmotifstatedinthefirsttheme,whichisusedinthedevelopmentsection). Theexclusionof normalarpeggios isduetothefact thattheyarecommonasharmonicaccompanimentduringthatperiod.

    6 ThescoreusedisfromtheNeueMozartAusgabe.

  • Feldmahler6

    introductiontoaclose.WecanseeinthisintroductionaveryclearpresentationofthefundamentalIdea

    thatgovernstheentirepiece,namelythejuxtapositionofascentanddescent,orinabroadersenselight

    anddarkness.

    Anotherinterestingwaytoanalyzetheeffectofthispassagewithregardstotheideaofrhetoricis

    presentedbyKeefe.Sincethisintroductionwouldbetheequivalenttotheexordiuminanoratorio,Keefe

    quotesCiceroasdistinguishingbetweentwotypesofexordium:thedirectprincipium,andtheindirect

    insinuatio.Theintroductionwouldbeanexemplarymodelfortheinsinuatioapproach,sincethevoices

    creepinquietlyonebyone,graduallyandalmostimperceptiblyincreasingthenumberofpartsfromone

    totwo,three,four,withunobtrusivesubjectsavoidinglargeleapsorfasterrhythms(Kierkendale,qtd.in

    Keefe99),whichisexactlythedescriptionofinsinuatioinmusic.7Bothmethodsofanalysisagreethat

    thisintroductioncanbestronglyparalleledtotheexordiuminanoration.

    V. TheExpositionofK.465

    WhatcanbecalledthefirstthemeofK.465isessentiallymanyrepetitionsofadiatonicversion8

    oftheascendingmotifstrungtogether.Thisalsodictatesthegeneralsenseoftheentiresectionofmusic

    until the entrance of the theme in the dominant at m. 56; here the ascendingmotif dominates

    completely,althoughthereareafewstatementsofthedescendingmotif(seethenicealterationinthe

    violinsbetweentheascendinganddescendingmotifsfromthesecondhalfofm.35tom.379).Eventhe

    7 ThewholeparagraphpriortothisfootnoteisasummaryofKeefe'sargumentonp.99.8 Bydiatonic,Imeanascaleinwhichnotwoadjacentintervalsarebothsemitones,andbychromatic,

    everythingelse.9 Oneshouldnoteheretheuseofpianowiththedescendingmotifandsforzandowiththeascendingmotif,

    suggestingthedominanceoftheascendingmotif.Thiswillbereversedinthesecondtheme,asweshallseeshortly.

  • Feldmahler7

    transition,startingatm.44withthecello,isdominatedmostlybytheascendingmotif,thoughitdoes

    introducewhatBondscallthenotterriblysignificantvariationofapreviousidea(103).Whileperhaps

    beingnotterriblysignificant,itdoescontributetoanotherweaktwovoice10variationoftheascending

    motifthatwillbeintroducedlateroninthesecondtheme.

    Thesecondthemestartsonm.56withanoisyandboldstatementofthethesisinthefirstviolin,

    tobeimmediatelyfollowedbytheweaktwovoicevariationoftheascendingmotif.Thisversionofthe

    ascendingmotifisratherhesitant;itisnotasselfaffirmingasotherversionsespeciallyinthiscontext

    sincenotonlyisitnotastraightscalarline,itisalsoplayedmostlypiano,incontrasttothedescending

    motif,whichisplayedforte.11Theharmonicprogressionthataccompaniesitfromm.60tom.67isalso

    quiteunstable,withthemovementaroundthecircleoffifths.Thisdestabilizationofwhatwasastable

    ascendingmotifcanbeseenasareactiontotheboldentry(orreentry,iftheIntroductionisincluded)of

    thedescendingmotifitself.Thisoppositionofdescendingandascendingmotifsdoesnotgetresolvedin

    thisportionofthesecondthematicarea;instead,thelimbomusiccomesbackforonemeasureatm.72,

    functioningsimilartoanintroductiontothesecondhalfofthesecondthematicarea.

    Thesecondhalfofthesecondthematicareastarts,motivically,onthesecondhalfofm.73.While

    thismightatfirstseemtonotbeinanywayasplittingpointstructurally(andmaystillnotbe;m.72

    seemslikeamuchbettersplittingpoint), it ismotivicallyofcrucial importance;astrongchromatic

    versionofthedescendingmotifisalmostsimultaneouslyintroducedinallfourinstruments.Thisisalso,

    10 Twovoicebecauseitcanbeseenastwoascendingmotifsathirdapartcompressedintooneline.11 Asnotedbefore,thisisareverseofwhathappenedinthefirsttheme(seefootnote9above).

  • Feldmahler8

    ofcourse,thefirstintroductionofthechromaticdescendingmotifsincetheIntroductionitself.Andthe

    significanceofthisisnotlostontherestoftheexposition;almostimmediatelyafterthischromatic

    descendingmotifentrance,12therearestatementsofthedescendingmotifeverywhere(anduninterrupted

    too),untilm.86.Thisissimilartothedominanceoftheascendingmotifinthefirstthematicarea;hereit

    isthedescendingmotifassertingitsdominanceovertheascendingmotif.

    This dominance of the descending motif, however, is broken by the same instrument that

    originallyintroducedit,inm.87,withasweepingfortestatementoftheascendingmotifthatspansmore

    than2octaves.Ascanbeexpected,themusicenterslimbo13againforthreemeasuresafterwards(m.

    8891),whilecadencingstronglyonG.Afterthecadence(m.91),weenterasectionthatcanbecalled

    theclosingtheme,sinceinthissectionthedescendingandascendingmotifsaresynthesized.Weseea

    returnofthesamevariationoftheascendingmotifusedinthefirsttheme,butthistime,duetothe

    contrast with previous statements of theascending motif in thesecond thematicarea, seemnot as

    assertive:notonlyisitplayedpiano,italsousesplaineighthnotes,incontrasttothetripleteighthsor

    sixteenthsusedinthesecondthematicareaforstatementsofboththeascendinganddescendingmotifs.

    Alsonotethatthedescendingmotifcomesbackandalternateswiththeascendingmotifafewbarsinto

    thesection,breakingwhateverdominancetheascendingmotifhadleft(ifithadanyinthissectionatall).

    Thisculminatesinthesectionclimaxatm.103,whenbothascendinganddescendingmotifsarestated

    together,withtwoinstrumentsplayingeach,aperfectsynthesis.NotealsothepoignantAflatinthe

    12 Thereisindeedonebarof limbomusic(m.76)rightafterthestatementofthechromaticdescendingmotif,butthiscaneasilybeseenasaphrasingrequirement.

    13 This,unlikethepreviouslimbo,doesnotusethelimboideafromtheIntroduction,butitdoeshavethesamesenseofhovering,withminimal(linewise,notharmonywise)senseofdirection.

  • Feldmahler9

    cello;notonlydoesitseemlikeanechooftheAnatural/AflatcrossrelationintheIntroduction(thereis

    ahighAnaturalinthefirstviolinthe8thnotedirectlybefore),italsofurtherhighlightstheimportanceof

    thissectionclimax.

    VI. TheDevelopment

    ThedevelopmentsectionofK.465startsonm.107andendsonm.154.Interestingly,theentire

    sectioncanbecalledaretransitioninthesensethatoneofitsmainpurposesistotransitionfromthe

    synthesisbacktotheascendingmotifdominatedfirsttheme.Indeed,amidallthelimbolikeideasand

    harmonicinstability,weonlyseestatementsoftheascendingmotif,boththefirstthemeversionofit,and

    anarpeggiatedvariationof thatversion,withnotasinglestatementof thedescendingmotif.14 This

    section,intheorationschema,canbeseenassomethingsimilartotheproof;somethingtoreassertthe

    dominanceoftheascendingmotif.

    VII.TheRecapitulation

    Therecapitulationstartsinm.155,andmainlyfollowsthesetupoftheexposition.However,like

    allrecapitulationsinsonatas,therearechanges,anditisthesechangesthatwewillconcernourselves

    withinthissection,especiallychangesaffectingthemotifs.

    Themainchangesintherecapitulationarenotdirectlyrelatedtothemotifs;theyaremainly

    concernedwiththeenrichmentofharmonictexture(doubledlines,increasedpolyphony).However,the

    transitionismostlycutout(exceptforthecadenceattheend),ratherthantransposedormodified,which

    14 Therearesomearpeggiateddownwardmovementat theend,buttheyarenotdirectlyrelated (asavariation)toanyversionofthedescendingmotif,andcanbeseeninthiscontextasanaestheticwayofclosingthedevelopmentsection:itsetsupalittlecontrastsothatthereturnofthefirstthemesoundsfresh.

  • Feldmahler10

    considerablylessensthejuxtapositionoftheascendinganddescendingmotifs.Itsabsencealsolessens

    theexpectationofthesecondthematicareasincethereisnoprolongedbuildup.Ofcourse,thefactthat

    thedescendingmotif(i.e.secondthematicarea)comesbackinthetonickeyalsocontributestothis.

    Thebeginningofthecoda(whichstartsonm.227)isthesameasthedevelopmentsection,which

    maywellbeintentional:tomakeitseemlikethereisarepeat.However,itquicklyveersaway,intowhat

    seemsalmostlikeasummaryofthedevelopment,withprolongedharmonicinstabilityforthefirst5bars

    (alongwith statementsof a fairly strong semichromatic versionof theascendingmotif, andsome

    limbomusic),followedbyastrongcadenceinthetonic(m.235).Thenwehavewhatcanbeseenasa

    celebrationofthedominanceoftheascendingmotifoverthedescendingmotif(orlightoverdarkness),

    withmultiplefortestatementsofthearpeggiatedversionoftheascendingmotifthatwasusedinthe

    developmentsection.Yet,theendingisofsynthesis;note,inm.241tom.244,thateventhoughthemost

    immediatelynotablelineisthefirstviolinplayingtheascendingmotif,boththesecondviolinandviola

    playthedescendingmotifinhalfnotes.

    VIII.RelationshipofAnalysistotheIdeaofRhetoric

    Afterthisanalysis,therelationshipofK.465totheideaofrhetoricshouldbeclear.Indeed,one

    canevencallK.465anexemplaryexampleoftheideaofrhetoric;thecoherenceofthemusic,motivically

    speaking,isstunning.Itisalsowiththisanalysisthatwemayconclude,notonlythatideasintherestof

    thepiece[flow]outoftheHauptsatz[orIdea](Bonds102),butthatitdoessotothepointthattheIdea

    itselfdictatestheform,ratherthanfollowit.Alsotobenotedhereisthefactthat,eventhoughthepiece

    doesnotfollowtheorationschemaexactly,itdoeshavethemainelementsofit:theexordium/narratio

  • Feldmahler11

    (introduction),propositio (firsttheme), confirmatio (developmentsection15), confutatio (secondtheme),

    andtheperoratio(synthesis,i.e.coda).

    Onemaywellsay,afterreadingthisanalysis,thattheideabeingpostulatedasthemainHauptsatz

    ofthepieceistoogeneral;indeed,scalesofallsortscanbeseeninmany,perhapsmost,classicalpieces.

    Indefense,Iwilldrawattentiontotheamountofscalarmotioninthispiece,andthepositioninthe

    structureofthemovementthattheyoccupy.Bothwhatcanbecalledthefirstandsecondthemesare

    heavilyscalar;thefirstbeingaseriesascendingscalesstrungtogether,andthesecondbeingastrong

    (loud)andlongdescendingscalefollowedbyatimidascendingresponse.Whilescalesareindeed

    commonlyusedduringtheclassicalperiod,fewworksexhibitsuchstrictscalarmotionintheirvery

    themes;forexample,noneoftheotherfiveHaydnQuartets16havesuchstrictlyscalarthemes,especially

    withsuchclearscalarcontrast(ascendingvs.descending)betweenthefirstandsecondthemes.

    Circumstantialevidence,especiallyseeminglycommonones,cannotprovetheintentionofthe

    composer,butwhenenoughpointtothesamesource,itisimpossibleforustoignoreitcompletely.

    Indeed, it canevenbeaskedwhether it is necessary to prove intention; for, as Matthesonputs it,

    experiencedmastersproceedinanorderlymanner,evenwhentheydonotthinkaboutit(qtd.inBonds

    87).

    15 Thedevelopmentsectioncanbeseenasrelatedtotheproof(confirmatio)inthesensethatitreassertsthedominanceofthefirsttheme,afteritwasdisplacedbythesecondinthesecondthematicarea.

    16 K.387,421(K6.417b),428(K6.421b),458,and464.

  • Feldmahler12

    WorksConsulted

    Bonds,MarkEvan.WordlessRhetoric:MusicalFormandtheMetaphoroftheOration.

    Cambridge,Mass.:HarvardUniversityPress,1991.

    DeFotis,William.Mozart,QuartetinC,K.465.19thCenturyMusic6.1(1982):3138.

    Eisen,Cliff.Mozart'sChamberMusic.TheCambridgeCompaniontoMozart.Ed.SimonP.Keefe.

    Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,2003.105117.

    Keefe,SimonP.AnIntegrated'Dissonance':Mozart's'Haydn'QuartetsandtheSlowIntroductionof

    K.465.MozartJahrbuch(2002):87103.

    LaRue,Jan.TheHaydnDedicationQuartets:AllusionorInfluence?TheJournalofMusicology18.2

    (Spring,2001):361373.Mozart,WolfgangAmadeus.NeueAusgabesmtlicherWerke:StringQuartetK.465.

    Ed.ErnstFritzSchmid.Kassel:Barenreiter,1958.

    Vertrees,JulieAnne.Mozart'sStringQuartetK.465:TheHistoryofaControversy.

    CurrentMusicology17(1974):96114.

top related