analysis of k.465 first movement

12
Feldmahler 1 Feldmahler 02 November 2006 An Analysis of the First Movement of Mozart's K.465 in Relation to the Idea of Rhetoric and Oration I. Introduction While there are several analytical studies of the famous introduction to Mozart's Dissonant Quartet K.465, few of these studies elaborate on the relevance of this introduction to the rest of the first movement. Yet, if we are to follow the idea of music as rhetoric as propounded by Enlightenment writers with regards to instrumental music, the most natural and crucial follow-up analysis would be to see how the ideas in this extraordinary introduction are stated and elaborated upon in the rest of the piece. An notable exception to this is Mark Evan Bonds, who did indeed do a brief analysis of K.465 in his book. Yet, not only is it extremely brief, it also seems to miss the main idea of the piece itself, which rather weakens this example in his argument for the idea of rhetoric in classical music. To remedy this analytical defect, we will first briefly discuss and define this idea of rhetoric which we are trying to measure K.465 against. We will then engage in a detailed analysis of the first movement of K.465, and find out whether these ideas also apply to K.465. II. The Idea of Rhetoric in Instrumental Music Koch wrote in his Musikalisches Lexikon  of 1802 that rhetoric is “the name given by some teachers of music to that body of knowledge belonging to composition by which individual melodic sections are united into a whole, according to a definite purpose” (qtd. in Bonds 53), or, as later other writers put it, “unity in variety” (Bonds 98). Indeed, as Bonds notes, rhetoric in most 18th century 

Upload: mohabe

Post on 05-Sep-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Analysis_of_K.465_First_MovementAnalysis_of_K.465_First_Movement.pdf Analysis_of_K.465_First_Movement.pdf

TRANSCRIPT

  • Feldmahler1

    Feldmahler

    02November2006

    AnAnalysisoftheFirstMovementofMozart'sK.465inRelationtotheIdeaofRhetoricandOration

    I. Introduction

    While there are several analytical studies of the famous introduction to Mozart's Dissonant

    QuartetK.465,fewofthesestudieselaborateontherelevanceofthisintroductiontotherestofthefirst

    movement.Yet,ifwearetofollowtheideaofmusicasrhetoricaspropoundedbyEnlightenmentwriters

    withregardstoinstrumentalmusic,themostnaturalandcrucialfollowupanalysiswouldbetoseehow

    theideasinthisextraordinaryintroductionarestatedandelaborateduponintherestofthepiece.An

    notableexceptiontothisisMarkEvanBonds,whodidindeeddoabriefanalysisofK.465inhisbook.

    Yet,notonlyisitextremelybrief,italsoseemstomissthemainideaofthepieceitself,whichrather

    weakensthisexampleinhisargumentfortheideaofrhetoricinclassicalmusic.

    Toremedythisanalyticaldefect,wewillfirstbrieflydiscussanddefinethisideaofrhetoricwhich

    wearetryingtomeasureK.465against.Wewillthenengageinadetailedanalysisofthefirstmovement

    ofK.465,andfindoutwhethertheseideasalsoapplytoK.465.

    II.TheIdeaofRhetoricinInstrumentalMusic

    Kochwrote inhis MusikalischesLexikon of1802 that rhetoric is thenamegivenbysome

    teachersofmusic tothatbodyofknowledgebelongingtocompositionbywhichindividualmelodic

    sectionsareunitedintoawhole,accordingtoadefinitepurpose(qtd.inBonds53),or,aslaterother

    writersput it, unity invariety(Bonds98). Indeed,asBondsnotes,rhetoric inmost18thcentury

  • Feldmahler2

    writingsiscloselytiedtobroaderconceptualissuesoflargescaleform(Bonds53).

    Andinthisissueoflargescaleform,the Hauptsatz occupiesadominantposition.Kirnberger

    defines Hauptsatz asaperiodwithinamusicalworkthatincorporatestheexpressionandthewhole

    essenceofthemelody(qtd.inBonds94).TheimplicationsofthisideaofaHauptsatzseemstwofold.

    Ononehand,itsupportstheideaofunityinvariety,whichBondscallsoneofthemostimportant

    aestheticdoctrinesoftheeighteenthcentury(Bonds98).Ontheotherhand,italsosupportstoacertain

    extenttheideaofmusicasoration,1 inthesensethatthe Hauptsatz canbeseenasthethesisofthe

    oration;andsinceideas...flowoutoftheHauptsatz(Marpurg,qtd.inBonds102),therestofthepiece

    canalsoconceivablybeparalleledwiththerestoftheoration,allofwhichisinsomesortofrelationto

    theHauptsatz.Morespecifically,Matthesonarguesthatanentiremusicalworkmustobservethesame

    six parts that are normally prescribed for the orator, namely: the introduction, the narration, the

    proposition, the proof, the refutation, and the closing, otherwise known as: Exordium, Narratio,

    Propositio,Confirmatio,Confutatio,andPeroratio(Bonds8586).Herewemustnotethedichotomy

    betweenthegeneral(unityinvariety)andthespecific(structureofanoration).Yetthisissurelyfar

    fromablackandwhitesituation;rather,itcanbeseenasaspectrum,withthegeneralatoneend,andthe

    specificattheotherend.

    ItisindeedfromthisvantagepointofrhetoricthatweapproachtheanalysisofK.465,toconfirm,

    first,whetherthepiececonformstotheideaofrhetoricatall,andifitdoes,thedegreetowhichit

    conformswiththespecificintheideaofrhetoric.However,asBondsnotes,one'sevaluationofthe

    1 BondsnotesthatMatthesoncallsthemusicalworkaKlangrede,anorationinnotes(Bonds85).

  • Feldmahler3

    relationshipamong thematic ideas in any individualworkormovementdepends largelyuponone's

    broaderbeliefin(orskepticismtoward)theverylegitimacyofsuchconnections(Bonds101).Iwillnot

    pretendthatIamcompletelyneutralonthissubject,butwillinsteadallowtheanalysistospeakforitself.

    III. TheIdea2

    Bondsnotesthattherearetwomotifs,whichhecallsmotifsaandb,3thatareexpandedupon

    andvaried throughout themovement, yet hefails tonote thecrucial importanceof therelationship

    betweenthetwomotifsontheentirepiece.Indeed,ifthereisoneIdeathatgovernstheentiremovement,

    itwouldbethisrelationship,andnotthetwomotifsthemselves.Thisisnottosaythatthetwomotifsare

    trivial(theyarenot),butratherthatthetwomotifsarethemselvesmerelymanifestations,ratherthanthe

    essenceof,thisIdea.

    ThemostobviousmanifestationofthisIdeaisindeedquitedirect:theamountofsheercontrast

    between the introduction and the movement proper is astounding. Not only do we emerge from

    dissonanceintoconsonance,minorintomajor,butthereisalsoapeculiarchangefromameterto

    commontime.This wealthofcontrastsbetweeneven thegeneral senseof the introductionand the

    movementpropershouldgivehintsastotheidentityofthisfundamentalIdeathatMozartattemptsto

    expoundinthismovement(ifnottheentirework).AsSimonKeefepointsout,theanalogyofdarkness

    tolightisacommondescriptionofthecontrastbetweentheintroductionandthemovementproperin

    2 WhileKirnbergernotesthattheHauptsatz isgenerallycalledthe'theme'(Bonds94),wewillusethewordIdeaasasynonymfortheHauptsatzinthefollowinganalysistoavoidconfusion.

    3 AccordingtoBonds,motifaisadescendingline,andbanascendingline(Bonds102103).Notethatforthepurposesofthisanalysistherhythmofthemotifwillnotbeconsidered,inordertoconcentrateonthemotif,andavoidanoverlybroadscopeofdiscussion.

  • Feldmahler4

    secondaryliterature(90).Itisalso,however,ametaphorthatseemstofitwiththeIdeaverywell.

    Itisalsointhecontextofthiscontrastbetweendarknessandlightthatwecanfullyunderstandthe

    relationshipbetweenBonds'stwomotifs.Indeed,toevensaythattherearetwomotifsthatgovernthe

    piecewouldbetocompletelymissthepoint,forthereisonlyonemotif.WhatBondscallsthebmotif

    istheantithesisoftheamotif:notonlyisittechnicallytheretrogradeorinversionofa,itistreated

    asanantithesisthroughoutthemovement,asweshallseeshortly.Anditispreciselythisthatdetermines

    theentirestructureofthepiece,renderingthenotionofanalyzingthepieceintermsofsonataform

    superficial,andonlyusefulinsofarasitgivesusthemostgeneralsenseofstructure.

    Itmustalsobenotedthatthismotifitselfisnotarbitrary.Itis,insofarastheIdeaisconcerned,the

    bestmotif.ForinboththisIdeaanditscorrespondingmotif,weseereligious/philosophicalinfluenceson

    music.Inmanywesternreligions(nottheleastofwhichbeingChristianity),weseemanyinstancesof

    dualism:forexample,heavenvs.hell,lightvs.darkness.Anotherparallelinthisdualismwouldbeascent

    vs.descent,andtheideaoftheascenttoheaven(orthelight)andthedescenttohell(ordarkness).When

    werealizethis,thereasonforthechoiceofthisparticularmotif(anditsantithesis)onwhichtoexpound

    theIdeabecomesobvious.

    IV.TheIntroductionofK.465

    NowthatwehaveageneralsenseoftheIdeathatdrivesthispiece,itisnecessarytofindouthow

    thisideastructurestheentirepiece,andwewillbeginthistaskbyexaminingtheintroductionitself.Due

    tothepopularityofthisintroductionwithmusictheorists,thereareavarietyofexcellentanalysisofthe

  • Feldmahler5

    harmonicimplicationsandcrossrelationsintheintroduction.4However,thisisnotthestyleofanalysis

    thatwewilltake,sinceweareinterestedmoreinthemotivicaspectoftheintroduction.5

    Bonds,amongmanyotherwriters,notedtheusageofthedescendingmotifinthechromaticcello

    linefromm.1tom.12.6However,thereisanotherlayerinthemusicthatisatleastasimportant;andthis

    wouldbethelinesofthethreeotherinstruments.Indeed,allofthemstartwithashortversionofthe

    descendingmotif, followed immediately by the ascendingmotif, which not only neatly ends that

    particularphrase,butalsolaysouttheIdea.Eventhecelloitselfalternatesbetweenthedescendingand

    ascendingmotifs:immediatelyaftertheendingalongexpositionofthedescendingmotifonm.12,the

    ascendingmotifisintroducedinm.13,onlytobecontradictedagainonebarlaterbythedescending

    motif.Duringthistime,theotherinstrumentshavenotbeenidle;thedensepolyphonyischalkfullof

    alternatingstatementsofbothascendinganddescendingmotifs,mostlyinastrongchromaticversionof

    themotifs.Allthiscomestoatemporaryhaltonm.16,wherethemusicentersintoalimbolikestate,

    untilaheavilymodifieddiatonicversionoftheascendingmotifappearsinthecelloinm.19.Yetanother

    versionoftheascendingmotifappearsinbothviolinsabarlater(m.20),andwhichalsobringsthe

    4 HereIreferthereadertoWilliamDeFotis,"Rehearings:Mozart,QuartetinC,K.465."19thCenturyMusic6.1(1982):3138,andSimonP.Keefe,"AnIntegrated'Dissonance':Mozart's'Haydn'QuartetsandtheSlowIntroductionofK.465."MozartJahrbuch2002(2002):87103.

    5 Aclarificationoftheexactmeaningsoftheascendinganddescendingmotifsisinorder.Itismoreaccuratetocallthemtheascendinganddescendingvariationsofthemotif,butisinconvenienthereduetothewordiness,andsoascendingmotifanddescendingmotifareusedinstead,eventhoughitisreallythesamemotif.Also,bothmeanascalarline(thestrongversionbeingchromaticandtheweakerdiatonic),anddoes not includearpeggios, unless it is a clearvariation of someversionof themotif (ex. thearpeggiatedvariationoftheversionoftheascendingmotifstatedinthefirsttheme,whichisusedinthedevelopmentsection). Theexclusionof normalarpeggios isduetothefact thattheyarecommonasharmonicaccompanimentduringthatperiod.

    6 ThescoreusedisfromtheNeueMozartAusgabe.

  • Feldmahler6

    introductiontoaclose.WecanseeinthisintroductionaveryclearpresentationofthefundamentalIdea

    thatgovernstheentirepiece,namelythejuxtapositionofascentanddescent,orinabroadersenselight

    anddarkness.

    Anotherinterestingwaytoanalyzetheeffectofthispassagewithregardstotheideaofrhetoricis

    presentedbyKeefe.Sincethisintroductionwouldbetheequivalenttotheexordiuminanoratorio,Keefe

    quotesCiceroasdistinguishingbetweentwotypesofexordium:thedirectprincipium,andtheindirect

    insinuatio.Theintroductionwouldbeanexemplarymodelfortheinsinuatioapproach,sincethevoices

    creepinquietlyonebyone,graduallyandalmostimperceptiblyincreasingthenumberofpartsfromone

    totwo,three,four,withunobtrusivesubjectsavoidinglargeleapsorfasterrhythms(Kierkendale,qtd.in

    Keefe99),whichisexactlythedescriptionofinsinuatioinmusic.7Bothmethodsofanalysisagreethat

    thisintroductioncanbestronglyparalleledtotheexordiuminanoration.

    V. TheExpositionofK.465

    WhatcanbecalledthefirstthemeofK.465isessentiallymanyrepetitionsofadiatonicversion8

    oftheascendingmotifstrungtogether.Thisalsodictatesthegeneralsenseoftheentiresectionofmusic

    until the entrance of the theme in the dominant at m. 56; here the ascendingmotif dominates

    completely,althoughthereareafewstatementsofthedescendingmotif(seethenicealterationinthe

    violinsbetweentheascendinganddescendingmotifsfromthesecondhalfofm.35tom.379).Eventhe

    7 ThewholeparagraphpriortothisfootnoteisasummaryofKeefe'sargumentonp.99.8 Bydiatonic,Imeanascaleinwhichnotwoadjacentintervalsarebothsemitones,andbychromatic,

    everythingelse.9 Oneshouldnoteheretheuseofpianowiththedescendingmotifandsforzandowiththeascendingmotif,

    suggestingthedominanceoftheascendingmotif.Thiswillbereversedinthesecondtheme,asweshallseeshortly.

  • Feldmahler7

    transition,startingatm.44withthecello,isdominatedmostlybytheascendingmotif,thoughitdoes

    introducewhatBondscallthenotterriblysignificantvariationofapreviousidea(103).Whileperhaps

    beingnotterriblysignificant,itdoescontributetoanotherweaktwovoice10variationoftheascending

    motifthatwillbeintroducedlateroninthesecondtheme.

    Thesecondthemestartsonm.56withanoisyandboldstatementofthethesisinthefirstviolin,

    tobeimmediatelyfollowedbytheweaktwovoicevariationoftheascendingmotif.Thisversionofthe

    ascendingmotifisratherhesitant;itisnotasselfaffirmingasotherversionsespeciallyinthiscontext

    sincenotonlyisitnotastraightscalarline,itisalsoplayedmostlypiano,incontrasttothedescending

    motif,whichisplayedforte.11Theharmonicprogressionthataccompaniesitfromm.60tom.67isalso

    quiteunstable,withthemovementaroundthecircleoffifths.Thisdestabilizationofwhatwasastable

    ascendingmotifcanbeseenasareactiontotheboldentry(orreentry,iftheIntroductionisincluded)of

    thedescendingmotifitself.Thisoppositionofdescendingandascendingmotifsdoesnotgetresolvedin

    thisportionofthesecondthematicarea;instead,thelimbomusiccomesbackforonemeasureatm.72,

    functioningsimilartoanintroductiontothesecondhalfofthesecondthematicarea.

    Thesecondhalfofthesecondthematicareastarts,motivically,onthesecondhalfofm.73.While

    thismightatfirstseemtonotbeinanywayasplittingpointstructurally(andmaystillnotbe;m.72

    seemslikeamuchbettersplittingpoint), it ismotivicallyofcrucial importance;astrongchromatic

    versionofthedescendingmotifisalmostsimultaneouslyintroducedinallfourinstruments.Thisisalso,

    10 Twovoicebecauseitcanbeseenastwoascendingmotifsathirdapartcompressedintooneline.11 Asnotedbefore,thisisareverseofwhathappenedinthefirsttheme(seefootnote9above).

  • Feldmahler8

    ofcourse,thefirstintroductionofthechromaticdescendingmotifsincetheIntroductionitself.Andthe

    significanceofthisisnotlostontherestoftheexposition;almostimmediatelyafterthischromatic

    descendingmotifentrance,12therearestatementsofthedescendingmotifeverywhere(anduninterrupted

    too),untilm.86.Thisissimilartothedominanceoftheascendingmotifinthefirstthematicarea;hereit

    isthedescendingmotifassertingitsdominanceovertheascendingmotif.

    This dominance of the descending motif, however, is broken by the same instrument that

    originallyintroducedit,inm.87,withasweepingfortestatementoftheascendingmotifthatspansmore

    than2octaves.Ascanbeexpected,themusicenterslimbo13againforthreemeasuresafterwards(m.

    8891),whilecadencingstronglyonG.Afterthecadence(m.91),weenterasectionthatcanbecalled

    theclosingtheme,sinceinthissectionthedescendingandascendingmotifsaresynthesized.Weseea

    returnofthesamevariationoftheascendingmotifusedinthefirsttheme,butthistime,duetothe

    contrast with previous statements of theascending motif in thesecond thematicarea, seemnot as

    assertive:notonlyisitplayedpiano,italsousesplaineighthnotes,incontrasttothetripleteighthsor

    sixteenthsusedinthesecondthematicareaforstatementsofboththeascendinganddescendingmotifs.

    Alsonotethatthedescendingmotifcomesbackandalternateswiththeascendingmotifafewbarsinto

    thesection,breakingwhateverdominancetheascendingmotifhadleft(ifithadanyinthissectionatall).

    Thisculminatesinthesectionclimaxatm.103,whenbothascendinganddescendingmotifsarestated

    together,withtwoinstrumentsplayingeach,aperfectsynthesis.NotealsothepoignantAflatinthe

    12 Thereisindeedonebarof limbomusic(m.76)rightafterthestatementofthechromaticdescendingmotif,butthiscaneasilybeseenasaphrasingrequirement.

    13 This,unlikethepreviouslimbo,doesnotusethelimboideafromtheIntroduction,butitdoeshavethesamesenseofhovering,withminimal(linewise,notharmonywise)senseofdirection.

  • Feldmahler9

    cello;notonlydoesitseemlikeanechooftheAnatural/AflatcrossrelationintheIntroduction(thereis

    ahighAnaturalinthefirstviolinthe8thnotedirectlybefore),italsofurtherhighlightstheimportanceof

    thissectionclimax.

    VI. TheDevelopment

    ThedevelopmentsectionofK.465startsonm.107andendsonm.154.Interestingly,theentire

    sectioncanbecalledaretransitioninthesensethatoneofitsmainpurposesistotransitionfromthe

    synthesisbacktotheascendingmotifdominatedfirsttheme.Indeed,amidallthelimbolikeideasand

    harmonicinstability,weonlyseestatementsoftheascendingmotif,boththefirstthemeversionofit,and

    anarpeggiatedvariationof thatversion,withnotasinglestatementof thedescendingmotif.14 This

    section,intheorationschema,canbeseenassomethingsimilartotheproof;somethingtoreassertthe

    dominanceoftheascendingmotif.

    VII.TheRecapitulation

    Therecapitulationstartsinm.155,andmainlyfollowsthesetupoftheexposition.However,like

    allrecapitulationsinsonatas,therearechanges,anditisthesechangesthatwewillconcernourselves

    withinthissection,especiallychangesaffectingthemotifs.

    Themainchangesintherecapitulationarenotdirectlyrelatedtothemotifs;theyaremainly

    concernedwiththeenrichmentofharmonictexture(doubledlines,increasedpolyphony).However,the

    transitionismostlycutout(exceptforthecadenceattheend),ratherthantransposedormodified,which

    14 Therearesomearpeggiateddownwardmovementat theend,buttheyarenotdirectlyrelated (asavariation)toanyversionofthedescendingmotif,andcanbeseeninthiscontextasanaestheticwayofclosingthedevelopmentsection:itsetsupalittlecontrastsothatthereturnofthefirstthemesoundsfresh.

  • Feldmahler10

    considerablylessensthejuxtapositionoftheascendinganddescendingmotifs.Itsabsencealsolessens

    theexpectationofthesecondthematicareasincethereisnoprolongedbuildup.Ofcourse,thefactthat

    thedescendingmotif(i.e.secondthematicarea)comesbackinthetonickeyalsocontributestothis.

    Thebeginningofthecoda(whichstartsonm.227)isthesameasthedevelopmentsection,which

    maywellbeintentional:tomakeitseemlikethereisarepeat.However,itquicklyveersaway,intowhat

    seemsalmostlikeasummaryofthedevelopment,withprolongedharmonicinstabilityforthefirst5bars

    (alongwith statementsof a fairly strong semichromatic versionof theascendingmotif, andsome

    limbomusic),followedbyastrongcadenceinthetonic(m.235).Thenwehavewhatcanbeseenasa

    celebrationofthedominanceoftheascendingmotifoverthedescendingmotif(orlightoverdarkness),

    withmultiplefortestatementsofthearpeggiatedversionoftheascendingmotifthatwasusedinthe

    developmentsection.Yet,theendingisofsynthesis;note,inm.241tom.244,thateventhoughthemost

    immediatelynotablelineisthefirstviolinplayingtheascendingmotif,boththesecondviolinandviola

    playthedescendingmotifinhalfnotes.

    VIII.RelationshipofAnalysistotheIdeaofRhetoric

    Afterthisanalysis,therelationshipofK.465totheideaofrhetoricshouldbeclear.Indeed,one

    canevencallK.465anexemplaryexampleoftheideaofrhetoric;thecoherenceofthemusic,motivically

    speaking,isstunning.Itisalsowiththisanalysisthatwemayconclude,notonlythatideasintherestof

    thepiece[flow]outoftheHauptsatz[orIdea](Bonds102),butthatitdoessotothepointthattheIdea

    itselfdictatestheform,ratherthanfollowit.Alsotobenotedhereisthefactthat,eventhoughthepiece

    doesnotfollowtheorationschemaexactly,itdoeshavethemainelementsofit:theexordium/narratio

  • Feldmahler11

    (introduction),propositio (firsttheme), confirmatio (developmentsection15), confutatio (secondtheme),

    andtheperoratio(synthesis,i.e.coda).

    Onemaywellsay,afterreadingthisanalysis,thattheideabeingpostulatedasthemainHauptsatz

    ofthepieceistoogeneral;indeed,scalesofallsortscanbeseeninmany,perhapsmost,classicalpieces.

    Indefense,Iwilldrawattentiontotheamountofscalarmotioninthispiece,andthepositioninthe

    structureofthemovementthattheyoccupy.Bothwhatcanbecalledthefirstandsecondthemesare

    heavilyscalar;thefirstbeingaseriesascendingscalesstrungtogether,andthesecondbeingastrong

    (loud)andlongdescendingscalefollowedbyatimidascendingresponse.Whilescalesareindeed

    commonlyusedduringtheclassicalperiod,fewworksexhibitsuchstrictscalarmotionintheirvery

    themes;forexample,noneoftheotherfiveHaydnQuartets16havesuchstrictlyscalarthemes,especially

    withsuchclearscalarcontrast(ascendingvs.descending)betweenthefirstandsecondthemes.

    Circumstantialevidence,especiallyseeminglycommonones,cannotprovetheintentionofthe

    composer,butwhenenoughpointtothesamesource,itisimpossibleforustoignoreitcompletely.

    Indeed, it canevenbeaskedwhether it is necessary to prove intention; for, as Matthesonputs it,

    experiencedmastersproceedinanorderlymanner,evenwhentheydonotthinkaboutit(qtd.inBonds

    87).

    15 Thedevelopmentsectioncanbeseenasrelatedtotheproof(confirmatio)inthesensethatitreassertsthedominanceofthefirsttheme,afteritwasdisplacedbythesecondinthesecondthematicarea.

    16 K.387,421(K6.417b),428(K6.421b),458,and464.

  • Feldmahler12

    WorksConsulted

    Bonds,MarkEvan.WordlessRhetoric:MusicalFormandtheMetaphoroftheOration.

    Cambridge,Mass.:HarvardUniversityPress,1991.

    DeFotis,William.Mozart,QuartetinC,K.465.19thCenturyMusic6.1(1982):3138.

    Eisen,Cliff.Mozart'sChamberMusic.TheCambridgeCompaniontoMozart.Ed.SimonP.Keefe.

    Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,2003.105117.

    Keefe,SimonP.AnIntegrated'Dissonance':Mozart's'Haydn'QuartetsandtheSlowIntroductionof

    K.465.MozartJahrbuch(2002):87103.

    LaRue,Jan.TheHaydnDedicationQuartets:AllusionorInfluence?TheJournalofMusicology18.2

    (Spring,2001):361373.Mozart,WolfgangAmadeus.NeueAusgabesmtlicherWerke:StringQuartetK.465.

    Ed.ErnstFritzSchmid.Kassel:Barenreiter,1958.

    Vertrees,JulieAnne.Mozart'sStringQuartetK.465:TheHistoryofaControversy.

    CurrentMusicology17(1974):96114.