139 the evaluation of cetacean strandings on the ... promotional materials.pdf · the evaluation of...

Post on 08-Aug-2020

2 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

The Evaluation of Cetacean Strandings on the Mediterranean Coasts of Turkey between 2009 and 2019

Cansu İLKILINÇ 1, Harun GÜÇLÜSOY 2

1 Mediterranean Conservation Society, İzmir, ilkilinccansu@gmail.com 2 Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Marine Sciences and Technology, İzmir, harun.guclusoy@deu.edu.tr

Although there are many cetacean stranding cases that occurred on thecoasts of Turkey every year, there is still no systematic strandingnetwork on the Turkish Mediterranean coast. Also, existing studies onthe subject in the Mediterranean are limited and not systematic. Theaim of this study is to give information on the evaluation of cetaceanstrandings by collecting the stranding cases occurred in the TurkishMediterranean coasts in the last decade and analyzing in terms ofparameters such as the number of individuals, species, geographicaldistribution, the status of case interventions causes of death.

METHODS

The data obtained based on existing images, reported or validated cases were collected

from television and newspaper news, web sites, related dissertations and published

articles between January 1, 2009 and April 20, 2019 and on Turkish Mediterranean

coast; from the Greek border in the north to the Syrian border in the south. While

evaluating the causes of death, cases known to be performed a necropsy have been

included in certain category and cases are known not to be performed necropsy but

existing findings of the causes of death have been included in the uncertain category.

The regional distributions of the cases have been prepared by using querying and

thematic mapping techniques in ArcMap 10.3.1 GIS software. The coordinates used in

mapping are the exact coordinates of the recorded cases in the articles. For the cases,

whose coordinates were not given, the midpoint of the closest coastline to the reported

location has been chosen.

CONCLUSIONS

It is thought that the obtained data were below actual figures since

there was no functioning stranding network for Turkish Mediterranean

coasts. Data provided by the media is much higher compared to

published articles. Therefore; it is necessary to establish a systematic

stranding network from where continuous monitoring data to be

gathered, and necessary first aid was given to ailing animals should be

operational on the Turkish Mediterranean coasts. It is important for

scientists to be aware of the cases and to evaluate the stranded

individuals and to obtain scientific data.

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

Media79%

Article9%

Report8%

Denunciation Call4%

Sources of Evaluated Data

Figure 1. Graph of sources of evaluated data

Most of the data (n = 90) has been

obtained from media. However,

only 10 articles regarding this

subject could be found for the

region.

Figure 2 Graph of Cetacean groups thatstranded in the Mediterranean in thelast decade

The most frequently stranded taxa

in the last 10 years belong to

dolphins (n=102), followed by

whales (n=11) and porpoises (n=1).

There is only one reported case for

the porpoise.

5

2429

10 2

38

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Cetacean Species Stranded in the Mediterranean in the Last Decade

Figure 3. Graph of Cetacean species stranded in the Mediterranean inthe last decade

In total, 113 stranding cases have been

recorded. In only one case, two individuals

(mother and calf) have simultaneously

stranded. Of the 114 individuals (Figure 3, 5),

the most frequently stranded species is S.

coeruleoalba (n=29) known that shows the

most common distribution in the region. 38

individual species have been evaluated in the

unknown category. 11 of them are live

strandings. Most of the stranded individuals,

species of which have been determined, are

evaluated in “Threatened” status in the IUCN

Red List Mediterranean; 46% VU (Vulnerable),

11% EN (Endangered).

Figure 7. Status of the case interventions

Figure 5. Map of stranded species

Table 1. Causes of death that belongs to individuals

Necropsies were performed for only 17.5% of the carcasses. 17% died due to disease (infection,

parasite, etc.), deliberate killing, drowning (fishing nets), trauma (internal bleeding) etc., 8% are

uncertain. It is recorded the disease (ectoparasites, infection, lung disease, etc.) factors largely

affect the species. This is followed by fishing nets and deliberate killing.

Most cases occurred in 2017 (n=17). It is seen that the number of

cases has increased in the last four years. It has been thought that

this increase is proportional to the increase in interest related to the

subject, in technology and social media usage.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Ecosystem Protection and Nature Lovers Association for case reports and veterinary surgeon Erdem Danyer, Sea Turtle Research and Rehabilitation Centre and

Animal Rights Federation for denunciations.

Denunciations have been received within the project titled ‘Determination of Threatening Factors and Stranding Frequency for Cetaceans Conservation in the Central Aegean

Coasts’ supported by Rufford Small Grant. The monitoring study is still in progress during 2019 with the financial support of SPA/RAC.

#139

http://www.bodrumdabugun.com/bitez%E2

%80%99de-yarali-yunus-bulundu/

September 29, 2011-

Muğla

https://www.denizhaber.com/balikcilik/yunus-

sandilar-ender-bulunan-balina-cikti-h15212.html

http://www.merhabahaber.com/mersin-sahilinde-olu-yunus-baligi-

bulundu-806300h.htm

January 9, 2009-Fethiye

June 6, 2016-Mersin

http://www.haberturk.com/olu-balina-kiyiya-vurdu-1992076#

https://gazeteistanbul.com/nesli-tukenmekte-olan-dev-balina-arsuzda-kiyiya-vurdu/

May 30, 2018-Antalya

June 20, 2017-HatayOctober 14, 2017-Antalya

http://www.turkiyegazetesi.com.tr/yasam/519412.aspx

Figure 4. Graph of IUCN Red List Mediterranean Conservation status of stranded Cetaceans

Figure 6. Graph of whether the cause of deathis known or unknown

Yes67%

No29%

Unknown4%

Status of the Case Interventions

109

10

7

3

6

15 15

1716

6

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Chart of Stranded Individuals According to Year

Stranded Individual

17%

75%

8%

25%

Graph of whether the Cause of Death is Known or Unknown

Certain Unknown Uncertain

1%

6%

11%

36%

46%

IUCN Red List Mediterranean ConservationStatus of Stranded Cetaceans

LC DD EN Unknown VU

Whale10%

Dolphin89%

Porpoise1%

Cetacean Groups that Stranded in the Mediterranean in the Last Decade

Cause of Death Certain UncertainStarvation 3 1Ectoparasite* 7 0Infection 2 0Lung disease 3 0Dicephalic 1 0Drowning, fishing nets 3 5Deliberate killing 3 1Trauma (internal bleeding) 1 1Marine pollution 1 0

INTRODUCTION

(*: Most individuals evaluated in the starvation and infection categories also have ectoparasite)

Figure 8. Chart of stranded individuals according to year

67% of the stranded individualswere intervened by the relatedinstitutions and organizations. Manyof them are known to be buriedwithout examination. In order to getmore information on the causes ofdeath, it should be forwarded to theplaces where the scientificinvestigation will be carried out.

top related