a&ma&m university texas. a&ma&m university texas module 2 environmental challenges:...
TRANSCRIPT
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Module 2
ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES:OVERVIEW FACING INDUSTRY
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
During the past years, the perceptions of pollutions have changed, industry has to find ways to make products without creating pollution or to recover and reuse the materials that we have considered wastes, this philosophy is called pollution prevention.
Process Integration is highly compatible with this philosophy and complementary to it. This discipline encompasses a number of methodologies for designing and changing industrial processes, based on the unity of the whole process.
This module presents an overview of the major environmental problems facing various industries in North America.It also presents Process Integration as a systematic approach to solving environmental problems.
Purpose of Module 2
Two major industries (pulp and paper and petroleum refineries) are used as proof of the concept.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
STRUCTURE OF MODULE 2
TIER 1: Basic Concepts
TIER 2: Case Study
TIER 3: Computer-Aided Module
The module is divided into three tiers as follows:
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
TIER 1 : BASIC CONCEPTS
This tier will provide a background including a general description of the major industries in North America, and focus on current environmental challenges facing the pulp and paper as well as the petroleum refining industries.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
TIER 1 : BASIC CONCEPTS
1. Major Industries in North America.
2.1 Driving forces, hurdles and potential.
2.3 Regulatory issues in North America.
2.2 Environmental discharges.
2.4 Best available environmental technologies for specific processes
2. Petroleum Industry
3. Pulp and Paper Industry
3.1 Driving forces, hurdles and potential.
3.3 Regulatory issues in North America.
3.2 Environmental discharges.
3.4 Best available environmental technologies for specific processes
CONTENTS
This section in broken into three sections:
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
1. MAYOR INDUSTRIES IN NORTH AMERICA
The most important industrial sectors in North America were sought not through their production but reviewing the quantity of their releases and pollutants.
Some statistics are organized by country :
CANADA USA MEXICO
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Canada is the world’s largest exporter of commodity-grade pulp and paper products, making this industry one
of the most important pollutant sector.
More Statistics: Canadian NPRITop 20 pollutantsMore information:
C A N A D A
INDUSTRIAL SECTORS RELEASING THE LARGEST QUANTITIES OF POLLUTANTS OFF-SIDE
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
Water, Sewageand OtherSystems
Pulp, Paper andPaperboard Mills
ElectricityGeneration,
Transmissionand Distribution
Pesticide,Fertilizer and
OtherAgricultural
chemicalManufacturing
Oil and GasExtraction
To
nn
es
Pulp, Paper and Paperboard mills
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
PollutantTotal Releases
(tonnes)Ammonia 40915.0Nitrate ion in solution at pH<6.0 22500.8Methanol 20427.5Hydrochloric ac id 16595.3Sulphuric ac id 9387.3Hydrogen sulphide 7234.3Xylene (mixed isomers) 6327.4T oluene 5908.5Methyl ethyl ketone 4137.6Carbon disulphide 4065.3n-Hexane 3562.8Zinc (and its compounds) 3310.0Hydrogen fluoride 3257.7Ethylene 2472.0Ethylene glycol 2347.4Manganese (and its compounds) 2195.4Styrene 1833.0Dic loromethane 1777.2Isopropyl alcohol 1751.0Formaldehyde 1727.0Cyclohexane 1382.32-Butoxyethanol 1223.1Acetaldehyde 1095.4Benzene 1047.1n-Butyl alcohol 1047.1
Top 5 Pollutants Released On Site in the Largest Quantities, 2001
0.0
5000.0
10000.0
15000.0
20000.0
25000.0
30000.0
35000.0
40000.0
45000.0
Ammonia Nitrate ion insolution at
pH<6.0
Methanol Hydrochloricacid
Sulphuric acid
To
nn
es
Top 20 Pollutants Released On Site in the Largest Quantities, 2001
C A N A D A
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
U S A
More Statistics: TRITop 20 pollutantsMore information:
Refineries and petroleum subproducts
are included.
T he U.S. petroleum industry is a strong contributor to the economic health of the United States, its production represents about the 25% of global production.
T he Pulp and Paper industry is also important since the U.S. is the world’s largest consumer or these products, both in total tones per year and in terms of consumption
per capita.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Chemical
Total Production Related W aste Managed
(Pounds)
Methanol 2,331,011,667 T oluene 1,787,944,977 Hydrochloric ac id 1,504,105,058 Zinc compounds 1,355,504,817 Copper compunds 1,263,772,355 Ethylene 1,256,806,620 Copper 1,088,001,030 n-Hexane 970,193,833 Lead Compounds 965,794,108 Cumene 832,570,075 Ammonia 800,432,076 Propylene 797,566,959 Nitrate compounds 701,130,070 Sulfuric ac id 583,305,201 Ethylene glycol 565,972,276 1,2-Dichloroethane 561,860,469 Chlorine 552,091,471 Xylene 479,477,559 Manganese compounds 477,625,043 Nitric ac id 411,681,261
Subtotal (top 20) 19,286,846,925
Total (all chemicals) 26,735,591,638
Top 10 Chemicals with the Largest Total Releases, 2001
-
500,000,000
1,000,000,000
1,500,000,000
2,000,000,000
2,500,000,000
To
tal P
rod
uct
ion
Rel
ated
Was
te M
anag
ed
(P
ou
nd
s)
U S A
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
M E X I C O
More information
I n Mexico, the petroleum industry development is strongly linked to the employment rate, inflation, economic growth and capital
investment.
Hazardous Pollutants produced by Industry
Petroleum industries provide raw material for the chemical industry.e.g.
Gas natural Ammonia Fertilizers
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Pulp and Paper Petroleum
As we showed in the statistics section, there are two industries which are very important for the economy and development and also are causing serious environmental problems, making a link between the three countries.
This research is attempting to show the way in which Process Integration can be used successfully. For this challenge we use the two major industries in North America:
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
No energy industry today is more engaged than petroleum in serving the global transportation, power generation, agricultural and consumer products sectors.
Oil and natural gas are essential drivers of economic growth, that implies enormous social and environmental responsibilities..
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
2.1 Driving forces, hurdles and potential.
2.4 Regulatory issues in North America.
2.3 Environmental discharges.
2.5 Best available environmental technologies for specific processes
2. Petroleum Industry
2.2 The Petroleum Refining Industry
2.2.1 Definition2.2.2 Primary Products2.2.3 Industrial Processes in the Petroleum Refining Industry2.2.4 Refinery flow diagram
2.3.1 Refinery air emission sources2.3.2 Types of wastewater produced in refineries2.3.3 Refinery Residuals2.3.4 Environmental discharges by process
2.4.1 U.S. Regulations2.4.2 Mexican Regulations2.4.3 General Regulations
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
According to Abdallah S. Jum’ah, president of Saudi Aramco, energy today, must have three characteristics which are totally interdependent:
RELIABILITY OF SUPPLY
Any nation’s ability to sustain domestic development will depend on a ready resource of fuels and feedstock. No other energy supplier today is more capable of assuring such a continuity of supply than the petroleum industry.
REASONABLE PRICE
The petroleum industry is one of the most capital-intensive, high-maintenance, heavily regulated and excessively taxed industries operating worldwide.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Environment should be protected in order to achieve a sustainable development.
In order to secure reliable supplies of oil and natural gas, there must be a price mechanism sufficiently fair and stable to maintain inflows of investment capital. In turn, the investment will help fund the industry’s considerable measures to protect environment.
These three characteristics can act as:•DRIVING FORCES
•HURDLES
•POTENTIALSFirst beak volume 20. 10 October 2002
The characteristics of the Petroleum Industry are related. In order to understand them, the following diagram in shown.
2.1 DRIVING FORCES, HURDLES AND POTENTIALS
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
•The petroleum refining industry is a strong contributor to the economic health of the United States and Mexico.
•For Mexico, this industry has become the most important part in the national economy, it is the first source of currency for the country.
•Hydrocarbons will long remain the resource of choice to fuel future economic progress worldwide. This is a reason not only to protect air, water and land resources, but also to keep serving society through these products.
DRIVING FORCES
Economic and environmental situations are involved in the development of the petroleum industry, but its final challenge must be to fulfill the society needs.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
HURDLES
The petroleum industry has been dramatically impacted over the last three decades by geopolitical disruptions and volatile world oil prices. Today refiners must deal with:
Increasing capital and operating costs of environmental compliance.
Volatile crude prices
Crude quality variability
Low marketing and transport profit margins
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
The environmental impact produced by the petroleum industry covers the effects of all and each step in the energetic cycle, which means:
•explotation•extraction •refining •transportation •storage •consumption •releases
HURDLES
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
POTENTIALSThe natural source itself and the reliability of supply must be the greatest potential for the country that posses them.
Technology plays an important role in developing the petroleum industry. Also, research and development have a great deal to do with keeping petroleum prices reasonable. In the past, new technologies had improved our methods of exploration and production, along with downstream efficiencies that yield cleaner-burning automotive fuels and higher-value products from every barrel of crude oil, allowing the increase and the improvement of the industry.
The U.S. is the largest, most sophisticated producer of refined petroleum products in the world, representing about 25% of global production.
Social and environmental issues will be decisive for the framework conditions for the future oil and gas industry. Technology is a tool that could help in achieving this task.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
2.2 PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
Petroleum refining is the physical, thermal and chemical separation of crude oil into its major distillation fractions which are then further processed through a series of separation and conversion steps into finished petroleum products.
Petroleum refineries are a complex system of multiple operations and the operations used at a given refinery depend upon the properties of the crude oil to be refined and the desired products.
2.2.1 DEFINITION
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
2.2.2 The primary products of this industry are divided into three categories:
FUELSCHEMICAL INDUSTRY
FEEDSTOCKS
naphtha, ethane, propane, butane, ethylene, propylene, butylenes, butadiene, benzene, toluene and xylene
FINISHED NON FUEL PRODUCTS
solvents, lubricating oils, greases, petroleum wax, petroleum jelly, asphalt and coke
motor gasoline, diesel and distillate fuel oil, jet fuel, residual fuel oil, kerosene and coke
These products are used as primary input to a vast number of products: fertilizers, pesticides, paints, waxes, thinners, solvents cleaning fluids, detergents, refrigerants, anti-freeze, resins, sealants, insulations, latex, rubber compounds, hard plastics, plastic sheeting and synthetic fibers.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
2.2.3 INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES IN THE PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
The process of oil refining involves five major processes which are briefly described:
SEPARATION PROCESSES
These processes involve separating the different fractions of hydrocarbon compounds that make up crude oil base on their boiling point differences. Additional processing of these fractions is usually needed to produce final products to be sold within the market.
• Atmospheric distillation• Vacuum distillation• Light ends recovery (gas processing)
SEPARATION CONVERSION TREATING BLENDING AUXILIARY
ASSOCIATED OPERATIONS
In order to understand where the environmental discharges come from, we will make a review of the refining process.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
SEPARATION CONVERSION TREATING BLENDING AUXILIARY
ASSOCIATED OPERATIONS
Include processes used to bread down large longer chain molecules into smaller ones by heating using catalysts.
• Cracking (thermal and catalytic)• Reforming• Alkylation• Polymerization• Isomerization• Coking• Visbreaking
CONVERSION PROCESSES
2.2.3 INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES IN THE PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
SEPARATION CONVERSION TREATING BLENDING AUXILIARY
ASSOCIATED OPERATIONSTREATING PROCESSES
Petroleum-treating processes are used to separate the undesirable components and impurities such as sulfur, nitrogen and heavy metals from the products.
• Hydrodesulfurization• Hydrotreating• Chemical sweetening• Acid gas removal• Deasphalting
2.2.3 INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES IN THE PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
SEPARATION CONVERSION TREATING BLENDING AUXILIARY
ASSOCIATED OPERATIONSBLENDING/COMBINATION PROCESSES
These are used to create mixtures with the various problem fractions to produce a desired final product, some examples of this are lubricating oils, asphalt, or gasoline with different octane ratings.
• Storage• Blending• Loading• Unloading
2.2.3 INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES IN THE PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
SEPARATION CONVERSION TREATING BLENDING AUXILIARY
ASSOCIATED OPERATIONSAUXILIARY PROCESSES
Processes that are vital to operations by providing power, waste treatment and other utility services. Products from these facilities are usually recycled and used in other processes within the refinery and are also important in regards to minimizing water and air pollution.
• Boilers• Waste water treatment• Hydrogen production• Sulfur recovery plant
2.2.3 INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES IN THE PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Stabilizer
At m
osp
her i
cD
isti
llat i
on
VacuumDistillation
SweeteningUnit
Visbreaker
Hydrotreating
CatalyticCracking
Solvent Extraction and
Dewaxing
LPH and Gas
Gasoline
Naphta
Middle Distillates
Gas Oil
Lube-BaseStocks
Sweet Gasoline
Middle Distillates
Gas
Gasoline
Light Gas Oil
Lube Oil
Waxes
Gasoline, Naphtha and Middle distillates
Fuel Oil
Asphalt
Tre
ati
ng a
nd B
lend
ing
Refinery fuel gas
Refinery fuel oil
Industrial fuels
Asphalts
Greases
Lube oils
Aviation fuels
Diesels
Heating oils
LPG
Gasoline
Solvents
Washed Crude
2.2.4 REFINERY FLOW DIAGRAM
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL DISCHARGES
Now, that we have seen an overview of the Refinery Process, we can make some questions:
What is this industry discharging?How is it discharged? Where does it come from?
In order to answer these questions, this section will show:
Air emission sourcesWastewater sourcesResidualsEnvironmental discharges by process
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
2.3.1 REFINERY AIR EMISSIONS SOURCES
COMBUSTION EMISSIONS: associated with the burning of fuels in the refinery, including fuels used in the generation of electricity.
EQUIPMENT LEAK EMISSIONS (fugitive emissions): released through leaking valves, pumps, or other process devices. They are primarily composed of volatile compounds such as ammonia, benzene, toluene, propylene, xylene, and others.
PROCESS VENT EMISSIONS: typically include emissions generated during the refining process itself. Gas streams from all refinery processes contain varying amounts of refinery fuel gas , hydrogen sulfide and ammonia.
STORAGE TAND EMISSIONS released when product is transferred to and from storage tanks.
WASTEWATER SYSTEM EMISSIONS from tanks, ponds and sewer system drains.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
2.3.2 TYPES OF WASTEWATER PRODUCED IN REFINERIES
SURFACE WATER RUNOFF is generated intermittently and may contain constituents from spills to the surface, leaks in equipment and materials in drains.
COOLING WATER which normally does not come into contact with oil streams and contains less contaminants than process wastewater. It may contain chemical additives used to prevent scaling and biological growth in heat exchanger pipes.
PROCESS WASTEWATER that has been contaminated by direct contact with oil accounts for a significant portion of total refinery wastewater. Many of these are sour water streams and are also subjected to treatment to remove hydrogen sulfide and ammonia.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
2.3.3 REFINERY RESIDUALS
Most refinery residuals are in the form of sludge, spend caustics, spend process catalysts, filter clay, and incinerator ash.
NON-HAZARDOUS RESIDUALS are incinerated, landfilled or regenerated to provide products that can be sold off-site or returned for re-use at a refinery.
HAZARDOUS WASTES are regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Listed hazardous wastes include oily sludge, slop oil emulsion solids, dissolved air flotation floats, leads tank bottom corrosion solids and waster from the cleaning of heat exchanger bundles.TOXIC CHEMICALS are also use in large quantities by refineries. These are monitored through the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI).
These residuals could be classified as follows:
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
PollutantAverage ratekg/t of crude
Particulate matter 0.8Sulfur oxides 1.3Nitrogen oxides 0.3Benzene, tolueneand xylene (BTX) 0.0025VOC 1
PollutantAverage ratemg/l ofwastewater
BOD 150-250COD 300-600Phenols 20-200Oil 100-300Benzene 1-100Benzopyrene 1-100Heavy metals 0.1-100Chrome 0.2-10
2.3.4 DISCHARGES
AIR EMISSIONSLIQUID EFFLUENTS
Approximately 3.5-5 cubic meters of wastewater per ton of crude are generated when cooling water is recycled.
Refineries generate solid wastes and sludges ranging from 3 to 5 kg per ton of crude processed, 80% of this sludges may be considered hazardous because or the presence of toxic organics and heavy metals.
SOLID WASTES
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Process Air Emissions Process Waste Water Residual Wastes Generated
Crude oil desalting Heater stack gas (CO,
SOx, NOx, hydrocarbons
and particulates), fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons)
Flow = 2.1 Gal/Bbl Oil,
H2S, NH3, phenol, high
levels of suspended solids, dissolved solids, high BOD, high temperature
Crude oil/desalted sludge (iron rust, clay, sand, water, emulsified oil and wax, metals)
Atmospheric distillation
Heater stack gas (CO,
SOx, NOx, hydrocarbons
and particulates), fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons)
Vacuum distillation Steam ejector emissions (hydrocarbons), heater
stack gas (CO, SOx,
NOx, hydrocarbons and
particulates), vents and fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons).
Thermal Cracking/Visbreaking
Heater stack gas (CO,
SOx, NOx, hydrocarbons
and particulates), vents and fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons)
Flow = 2.0 Gal/Bbl Oil,
H2S, NH3, phenol,
suspended solids, high pH, BOD, COD.
Typically, little or no residual waste generated.
Coking Heater stack gas (CO,
SOx, NOx, hydrocarbons
and particulates), vents and fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons) and decoking emissions (hydrocarbons and particulates).
Flow = 1.0 Gal/Bbl High
pH, H2S, NH3,
suspended solids, COD.
Coke dust (carbon particles and hydrocarbons).
Flow = 26 Gal/Bbl Oil,
H2S, NH3 suspended
solids, chlorides, mercaptans, phenol, elevated pH.
Typically, little or no residual waste generated.
2.3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL DISCHARGES BY PROCESSPART 1
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Process Air Emissions Process Waste Water Residual Wastes Generated
Catalytic Cracking Heater stack gas (CO,
SOx, NOx, hydrocarbons
and particulates), fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons) and catalyst regeneration
(CO, NOx, SOx, and
particulates).
Flow 1.5 Gal/Bbl High levels of oil, suspended solids, phenols
cyanides, H2S, NH3,
high pH, BOD, COD.
Spent catalysts (metals from crude oil and hydrocarbons), spent catalyst fines from electrostatic precipitators (aluminum silicate and metals).
Catalytic Hydrocracking
Heater stack gas (CO,
SOx, NOx, hydrocarbons
and particulates), fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons) and catalyst regeneration
(CO, NOx, SOx, and
catalyst dust).
Flow = 2.0 Gal/Bbl High COD, suspended solids,
H2S, relatively low levels
of BOD.
Spent catalysts fines (metals from crude oil, and hydrocarbons).
Hydrotreating/Hydroprocessing
Heater stack gas (CO,
SOx, NOx, hydrocarbons
and particulates), vents and fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons) and catalyst regeneration
(CO, NOx, SOx, and
catalyst dust).
Flow = 1.0 Gal/Bbl H2S.
NH3, High pH, phenols
suspended solids, BOD, COD.
Spent catalyst fines (aluminum silicate and metals).
Alkylation Heater stack gas (CO,
SOx, NOx, hydrocarbons
and particulates), vents and fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons)
Low pH, suspended solids, dissolved solids,
COD, H2S, spent
sulfuric acid.
Neutralized alkylation sludge (sulfuric acid or calcium fluoride, hydrocarbons).
Isomerization Heater stack gas (CO,
SOx, NOx, hydrocarbons
and particulates), vents and fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons)
Low pH, chloride salts, caustic wash, relatively
low H2S and NH3.
Calcium chloride sludge from neutralized HCl gas.
2.3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL DISCHARGES BY PROCESSPART 2
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Process Air Emissions Process Waste Water Residual Wastes Generated
Polymerization H2S from caustic
washing.
H2S, NH3, caustic wash,
mercaptans and ammonia, high pH.
Spent catalyst containing phosphoric acid.
Catalytic Reforming Heater stack gas (CO,
SOx, NOx, hydrocarbons
and particulates), HCl potentially in light ends), vents and fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons)
Flow = 6.0 Gal/Bbl High levels oil, suspended solids, COD. Relatively
low H2S.
Spent catalyst fines from electrostatic precipitators (alumina silicate and metals).
Solvent Extraction Fugitive solvents Oil solvents Little or no residual wastes generated.
Dewaxing Fugitive solvents, heaters Oil solvents Little or no residual wastes generated.
Propane Deasphalting
Heater stack gas (CO,
SOx, NOx, hydrocarbons
and particulates), fugitive propane.
Oil solvents Little or no residual wastes generated.
Merox treating Vents and fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons and disulfides).
Little or no wastewater generated
Spent Merox caustic solution, waste oil-disulfide mixture.
Wastewater treatment
Fugitive emissions (H2S,
NH3, and hydrocarbons)
Not Applicable API separator sludge (phenols, metals and oil), chemical precipitation sludge (chemical coagulants, oil), DAF floats, biological sludges (metals, oil, suspended solids), spent lime.
2.3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL DISCHARGES BY PROCESSPART 3
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Process Air Emissions Process Waste Water Residual Wastes Generated
Gas Treatment and Sulfur Recovery
SOx, NOx, and H2S from
vent and tail gas emissions.
H2S, NH3, amines,
Stretford solution.
Spent catalyst.
Blending Fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons)
Little or no wastewater generated
Little of no residual waste generated.
Heat Exchanger cleaning
Periodic fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons)
Oily wastewater generated
Heat exchanger sludge (oil, metals, and suspended solids)
Storage Tanks Fugitive emissions (hydrocarbons)
Water drained from tanks contaminated with tank product
Tank bottom sludge (iron rust, clay, sand, water, emulsified oil and wax, metals)
Blowdown and flare Combustion products
(CO, SOx, NOx, and
hydrocarbons) from flares, fugitive emissions
Little or no wastewater generated
Little or no residual waste generated.
2.3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL DISCHARGES BY PROCESSPART 4
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
2.4 REGULATORY ISSUES IN NORTH AMERICA
The Petroleum Refining Industry is unique in that the environmental requirements aimed at the industry are of two basic types:
For the purpose of this module, we focus on refineries, which will be used to show some Process Integration techniques.
Petroleum refineries are complex plants, and the combination and sequence of processes is usually very specific to the characteristics of the raw material and the products. For this reason the regulations for this sector become very specific and dispersed because an unit have regulations for water, air and land discharges, all of these managed by different official documents.
Requirements directed at reducing the environmental impacts of the refineries themselves.
Requirements mandating specific product qualities for the purpose of reducing the environmental impacts associated with the downstream use of the product.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
In the case of the United States, there are numerous federal regulations affecting the Refinery Industry. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contains several regulatory documents depending on the kind of resource that they pretend to protect, (e.g. Air, water and soil).
Each one of these documents presents requirements which apply for every industrial sector. Then, when the requirements for a certain industry are needed, specific parts of the document should be used. For example,
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 has some programs for reducing air emissions from industry in which refineries are included:
New Source Review, New Source Performance StandardsNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
At the same time, the New Source Performance Standards have some sections for Refineries:
Subpart J Standards of Performance for Petroleum RefineriesSubpart KKK Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels.Subpart GG Standard of Performances for Stationary Gas Turbines.Subpart GGG Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum Refineries
2.4.1 U.S. REGULATIONSEPA
website
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
All these sections contain flow diagrams, where depending on the process that is being used, it must be applied certain norm.
http://www.tnrcc.state.tx.us/permitting/airperm/opd/60/60hmpg.htm
To find more information:
2.4.1 U.S. REGULATIONS
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Requirement Provisions That Affect Petroleum Refining
Clean air Act of 1970 (CAA) and regulations National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) fix six constituents; new standards underNAAQS that require control of particulate matter of 2.5 microns or smaller; lead-free gasoline;low sulfur fuel; reformulated gasoline; hazardous air pollutants; visi
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) and regulations thereunder.
Oxygenated Fuels Program for “ nonattainment areas” low sulfur highway diesel fuel;Reformulated fuels Program; Leaded Gasoline Removal Program; Reid Vapor pressureregulations to reduce VOCs and other ozon precursors; New Source Review for new orexpande
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Standards and regulations for handling and disposing of solid and hazardous wastes.
Clean Water Act (CWA) Regulates discharges and spills to surface waters; wetlands.
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Regulates disposal of wastewater in underground injection wells
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
“superfund”, liability for CERCLA hazardous substances could apply to wastes generatedduring refining, includes past releases, exempts petroleum and crude oil; provides for naturalresource damages.
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know (EPCRA).
Requires annual reporting on the releases and transfers of listed toxic chemicals; reportingpresence of “extremely hazardous substances’ in excess or threshold planning quantities;reporting certain releases of CERCL hazardous substances and EPCRA extrem
1990 Oil Pollution act and Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plans
Liability against facilities that discharge oil to navigable waters of pose a threat of doing so.
OSHA Health Standards and Process Safety Management Rules
Limits benzene and other chemical exposures in the workplace, safety plans required in allrefineries.
Toxic Substances Control Act Collection of data on chemicals for risk evaluation, mitigation and control; can ban chemicalsthat pose unreasonable risks.
Energy Policy Act of 1992 Use of alternative fuels for transportation; efficiency standards for new federal buildings,buildings with federally backed mortgages, and commercial and industrial equipment; R&Dprograms for technologies; will reduce demand for petroleum products.
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING THE REFINERY INDUSTRY
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
In Mexico, SEMARNAT (Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales) is in charge or the environmental regulations, but it does not cover all aspects of a refinery because some of them are very specific, for example,
Proyecto NOM-088-ECOL-1994 Establish the maximum permissible levels of pollutants in the water discharges that become from storage and distribution of petroleum and its derivates.
A classification of these norms is found in this website:
http://www.semarnat.gob.mx
Then, if the complete document is needed, you can check here:http://cronos.cta.com.mx/cgi-bin/normas.sh/cgis/index.p
2.4.2 MEXICAN REGULATIONS
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Parameter Maximum valuePM 50
Nitrogen oxidesa 460
Sulfur oxides 150 for sulfur recovey units; 500 for other
unitsNickel and vanadium (combined)
2
Hydrogen sulfide 152
Parameter Maximum valuepH 6--9BOD 30COD 150TSS 30Oil and grease 10Chromium Hexavalent 0.1 Total 0.5Lead 0.1Phenol 0.5Benzene 0.05Benzo(a)pyrene 0.05Sulfide 1
Nitrogen(total)a 10Temperature increase <=3 C
Besides all these complicated regulations, an specialized agency of the United Nations, the World Bank, has established emission levels for the design and operation of refineries, although country legislation should be accomplished. The guidelines given below present emissions levels normally acceptable to the World Bank Group.
Emissions from the Petroleum Industry(milligrams per normal cubic meter)
Effluents from the Petroleum Industry(milligrams per liter)
Generation of sludges should be minimized to 0.3 kg per ton of crude processed, with a maximum of 0.5 kg per ton of crude processed.
Solid Wastes
2.4.3 GENERAL REGULATIONS
World Band Group, 1998. Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook. World Bank Group. Pages 377-381.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Primary wastewater treatment
Consists on the separation of oil, water and solids in two stages.
1st stageAPI separator or
Corrugated plate interceptor.
2nd stageChemical and physical methods are utilized to separate emulsified oils from the wastewater.
www.panamenv.com
Physical methods may include the use of series of settling ponds with a long retention time, or the use of dissolved air flotation (DAF).
Chemicals, such as ferric hydroxide or aluminum hydroxide are used to coagulate impurities.
More information about the equipment
More information about the equipment
www.panamenv.com
2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES USED IN THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Secondary wastewater treatment
Dissolved oil and other organic pollutants may be consumed biologically.
Biological treatment may require oxygen through different techniques:
• Activated sludge units• Trickling filters• Rotating biological contactors.
Generates bio-mass waste which is treated anaerobically.
Polishing
Some refineries employ it as an additional stage of wastewater treatment to meet discharge limits.
• Activated carbon• Anthracite coal• Sand
2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES PETROLEUM INDUSTRY
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
In order to meet the SOx emissions limits and to recover saleable sulfur, refinery process off-gas streams should be treated.
Process off-gas streams contain high concentrations of:
hydrogen sulfide + light refinery fuel gases.
This is accomplished by: • Dissolving the hydrogen sulfide in a chemical solvent such as diethanolamine (DEA) in an absorption tower.• Using dry adsorbents such as molecular sieves, activated carbon, iron sponge and zinc oxide.
These fuel gases (methane and ethane) need to be separated before elemental sulfur can be
recovered.
Amine + hydrogen sulfide Is then heated and steam stripped to remove the hydrogen sulfide gas.
Two processes are typically combined to remove sulfur from the hydrogen sulfide gas streams:
Claus Process
Beaven Process
Scot Process
Wellman-Land Process
hydrogen sulfide
2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES PETROLEUM INDUSTRY
Gas treatment and Sulfur Recovery
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Other emissions sources come from periodic regeneration of catalysts, these emissions may
contain:
high levels of carbon monoxide + particulates + VOCs.
CARBON MONOXIDE BOILERTo burn carbon monoxide and VOCs
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR OR CYCLONE SEPARATORTo remove particulate matter
Before being released to the atmosphere
2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES PETROLEUM INDUSTRY
Gas treatment
Solid waste treatment
Sludge treatment use bioremediation or solvent extraction, followed by combustion of the residues or by use for asphalt. The residue could require stabilization before disposal to reduce the leachability of toxic metals.
www.e2t.com/E2T/app_pc05.htm
More information:www.ppcesp.com
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Pulp and Paper Petroleum
As we showed in the statistics section, there are two industries which are very important for the economy and development and also are causing serious environmental problems, making a link between the three countries.
This research is attempting to show the way in which Process Integration can be used successfully. For this challenge we use the two major industries in North America:
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
The uses and applications for paper and paper products are limitless. It is important because it gives us the opportunity or recording, storage and dissemination of information. Also, it is the most widely used wrapping and packaging material and it is also used for structural applications.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
3.1 Driving forces, hurdles and potential.
3.4 Regulatory issues in North America.
3.3 Environmental discharges.
3.5 Best available environmental technologies for specific processes
3. Paper Industry
3.2 Overview of the Pulp and Paper process.
3.2.1 Different methods3.2.2 Main steps of the process
3.4.1 U.S. Regulations3.4.2 Canadian Regulations3.4.3 General Regulations
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
3.1 DRIVING FORCES
The U.S. forest products industry makes a strong contribution to the national economy, producing 1.2% of the U.S. GDP.
The industry employed almost 1.3 million people just in the United States.
Paper and wood products are used in many different applications both at home and at work.
The Pulp and Paper Industry provides employment for vast number of people and plays a vital role in the overall economy of both the United States and Canada.
Pulp and paper is the third largest industrial polluter to air, water and land in both Canada and the United States, and releases well over a hundred million kg of toxic pollution each year.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
3.1 HURDLES
The Pulp and Paper industry in North America is threatened by:
Plantation forests of fast growing tree species are being developed such countries as Brazil, Indonesia, Chile.
Quality-stand of timber have become more difficult and costly to access.
New competitors, with lower fiber costs, have entered the market (e.g. Russia, Austria, Chile, Australia, New Zealand and Indonesia).
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
3.1 POTENTIALS
The strong U.S. economy of the late 1990s has revived the pulp and paper industry. Now, this industry is one with the biggest average annual pace growth.
The Pulp and paper industry producers have some advantages:
•Potential of the US and Canadian market.
•Access to a substantial endowment of timber suitable for harvesting as saw and pulp logs.
•The high quality of wood-fiber derived from them.
•Access to low-cost, secure supplies of energy.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
The manufacture of pulp for paper and cardboard employs different methods:
CHEMIMECHANICAL A combination of the previous processes.
Separates fibers by such methods as disk abrasion and billeting, this pulp can be used without bleaching to make printing papers for applications in which low brightness is acceptable. For other applications, bleaches like peroxides and hydrosulfites must be used.
MECHANICALChemical pulps are made by cooking the raw materials, using the kraft (sulfate) and sulfite processes. Kraft processes produce a variety of pulps used mainly for packaging and high-strength papers and board. Oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, ozone, peracetic acid, sodium hypochlorite, chlorine dioxide, chlorine, and other chemicals are used to transform lignin into an alkali-soluble form.
CHEMICAL
3.2 OVERVIEW OF THE PULP AND PAPER PROCESS
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
The main steps in pulp and paper manufacturing are:
These steps are common for the three processes, although the difference is the units they use for each task.
Wood yard
Pulping
Bleaching
Paper manufactur
e
The significant environmental impacts of the manufacture of pulp and paper result from the pulping and bleaching processes.
3.2 OVERVIEW OF THE PULP AND PAPER PROCESS
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
PROCESS PURPOSE MAJOR TECHNOLOGIES
PULPING Convert wood chips of wastepaper into fibers suitable for papermaking.
Chemical (Kraft, sulfite)- digesters, mechanical – refiners, semi chemical – digesters & refiners.
CHEMICAL RECOVERY (KRAFT
PULPING)
Recovery of inorganic chemicals from spend pulping liquor and combustion of organic residuals to produce energy.
Evaporation concentration recovery boiler, causticizing, calcining.
BLEACHING Brighten of whiten pulps by using chemicals to selectively remove lignin.
Chlorine dioxide, oxygen, hypochlorite, peroxide, ozone, of chlorination- upflow of downflowtowers, vacuum washers, pumps, mixers.
PAPER MANUFACTURE
Prepare stock from pulp, sheet, dewater, dry, caleder.
Heat box, sheet forming table.
3.2 OVERVIEW OF THE PULP AND PAPER PROCESS
This table presents the purpose of each one of the processes presented before and the technologies used to reach their task.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL DISCHARGES
Average rates
Kg/t of ADP
Black liquor oxidation
Reduced sulfur compounds:
Hydrogen sulfide
Methyl mercaptan
Dimethyl sulfide
Dimethyl disulfide
Particulate matter 75 -150
Sulfur oxides 0.5 - 30
Nitrogen oxides 1--3
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) 15
Pulping
Sulfur oxides 15-30Steam and electricity generatin units
Fly ash 100
Pollutant
0.3-3
Average ratesKg/t of ADP
Wastewaters 20-250 m3/tBOD 10--40Total suspended solids 10--50COD 20-200Chlorinated organic compounds:DioxinsFuransAdsorbable organic halides
Pollutant
0-4
The principal solid wastes of concern include wastewater treatment sludge : 50-150 kg/t of ADP.
AIR EMISSIONS LIQUID EFFLUENTS
SOLID WASTES
ADP: Air dried pulp, defined as 90% bone-dry fiber and 10% water.t:metric ton.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
U.S. REGULATIONSThe key federal group responsible for the environment is the EPA, which is a regulatory agency that establish and enforce environmental standards.
The purpose of the EPA is to conduct research and suggest solutions to environmental problems. Simultaneously, it has an obligation to monitor and analyze the environment.
The components of the legislation that most influence the pulp and paper industry are the effluent limitation guidelines that define minimum effluent conditions for 1977 and 1983.
WATER REGULATIONS
AIR REGULATIONS
3.4 REGULATORY ISSUES
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Up to 1970, stream quality standards in the United States were largely the responsibility of individual states. The federal government became dominant until 1970, when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established.
In 1972, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act stipulated a step-wise schedule for meeting conventional discharge criteria, the first target level by 1977 being equivalent to “best practical technology” (BPT), and the second target level by 1983 being equivalent to “best available technology economically achievable”(BATEA).
In the early 1980’s these regulations included toxic or sub-toxic substances through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Among these were a number of byproducts of the chlorine bleaching process. Later, the EPA has increased the list of priority pollutants.
The U.S federal regulations that deal with environmental protection change every four years. It is a constant challenge to this industry to keep up-to-date.
BACKGROUND
PARAMETERSPARAMETERSPARAMETERS
TOXIC POLLUTANTS
WATER REGULATIONS
Other agencies:
• Effluent Standards and Water Quality Information Advisory Committee (ES&WQIAC).• The Council of Environmental Quality.• National Commission on Water Quality
BACKGROUND
TOXIC POLLUTANTS
New source performance stardard in kg/kkgMaximum 30-day average Maximum /day
Subcategory BDO5 TSS BDO5 TSSDissolving kraft 6.1 8.35 11.75 15.5Market kfaft 2.65 2.9 5.15 5.35BCT kraft 3.7 5 7.05 9.3Fine Draft 2.55 3.75 4.95 7Papergrade sulfite 4.65 2.9 8.98 5.35Market sulfite 4.65 2.9 8.95 5.35Low alpha dissolving sulfite 11.15 10 21.45 18.6High alpha dissolving sulfite 13.8 9.45 26.5 17.6GW: chemimechanical 3.9 3.3 7.5 6.15GW: thermomechanical 2.3 3.15 4.45 5.85GW:CMN papers 2 3.15 3.85 5.85GW: fine papers 1.9 3 5.6 5.6Soda 3.15 4.3 60 7.95Deink 3.9 4 7.5 7.45NI fine papers 1.35 1.4 2.6 2.6NI tissue papers 2.15 2.2 4.15 4.1NI tissue papers (FWP) 1.9 1.95 3.7 3.65
GW: groundwood NI: nonintegrated
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Acenaphthene DDT and metabolitesAcrolein DichlorobenzeneAcrylonitrile DichlorobenzidineAldrin/dieldrin DichloroethylenesAntimony and compounds 2,4-DichlorophenolArsenic and compounds Dichloropropane and dichloropropeneAsbestos 2,4-Dimethylphenol
DinitrotolueneBenzene DiphenylhydrazineBenzidineBeryllium and compounds Endosulfan and metabolites
EndrinCadmium and compounds EthylbenzeneCarbon tetrachlorideChlordane HaloethersChlorinated benzenes HalomethanesChlorinated ethanes Heptachlor and metabolitesChloralkyl ethers HexachlorocyclohexaneChlorinated napthalene HexachlorocyclopentadieneChlorinated phenolsChloroform Isophorone2-ChlorophenolChromium and compounds Lead and compoundsCopper and compoundsCyanides Mercury and compoundsNaphtalene Silver and compoundsNickel and compoundsNitrobenzene 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxinNitrophenols TetrachloroethyleneNitrosamines Thalium and compounds
ToluenePentachlorophenol Toxaphene Phenol TrichloroethylenePhthalate estersPolychlorinated bephenyls Vinyl chloridePolynuclear aromatichydrocarbons Zinc and compounds
Selenium and compounds
TOXIC POLLUTANTS
Settlement agreement toxic pollutants:
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
BACKGROUNDBACKGROUNDBACKGROUND
PARAMETERS
GENERAL INFORMATION
AIR REGULATIONS
Talking about the Pulp and Paper industry, the objective of air regulations is the elimination of hazardous air pollutants such as methanol, total reduced sulfur gases, and chlorine. Maximum achievable control technology (MACT) is the level of control at the average of the best 12% of the mills in the EPA data base of that category.
The MACT rules have three tiers sorted by mill type. •MACT I is for chemical pulp mills including kraft, semichemical, and sulfite.•MACT II is for kraft, soda, semichemical and sulfite combustion sources including recovery units, smelt dissolving tanks, and lime kilns. •MACT III is for paper machines, mechanical pulping and secondary fiber and nonwood fiber.
The Clean Air Act of 1963, was a benchmark piece of legislation. It represented the first allocation by the federal government of significant funds for air pollution problems.
In 1970, President Richard Nixon decided to form the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which absorbed the National Air Pollution Control Administration. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, covered three primary areas:•Attainment and maintenance of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).•Establishment of regulations covering the emission of certain pollutants from mobile and stationary sources.•Establishment of New Source Performance Standards (NSPS).EPA established standards for seven pollutants: sulfur dioxide, total suspended particulates, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, photochemical oxidants, hydrocarbons, and lead. NAAQS needed review every five years. The 1990 CAA is probably the most dramatically impacting air pollution legislation of all time became law in 1990. Possibly most important to the pulp and paper industry was the new air toxics control program. The 1990 law relied on technology to control emissions of 189 hazardous air pollutants.
Mill type Emission point PM HAP TGO HAP
Kraft and soda
Recovery funace PM < 0.015 grains/drystandard cubic foot at 8%oxygen
< 0.025 lb/ton of blackliquor solids (BLS)
Smelt dissolving tank PM < 0.12 lb/ton BLS None
Lime kiln PM < 0.01 grains/drystandard cubic foot at 8%oxygen
None
Sulfite
Sulfite combustionunits
PM < 0.02 grains/drystandard cubic foot at 8%oxygen
Stand alone semichemicalChemical recoverycombustion units
None < 2.97 lb/ton BLS or90% reduction
PM HAP: particulate matter hazardous material. TGO HAP: total gaseous organic hazardous material.
Representative MACT II limits
PARAMETERS
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
CANADIAN REGULATIONS
In 1992, the federal Canadian government released new Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations under the Fisheries Act.
The PPER set limits on BOD5, TSS, and acute toxicity and had numerous reporting requirements. Regulations limiting the discharge of chlorinated dioxins and furans also went into effect in 1992 under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA).
The CEPA and PPER regulations resulted in a massive investment to change bleaching processes and install secondary treatment before the end of 1996 at a many Canadian mills.
The first set of regulations for the pulp and paper industry, which came into force in 1971, did not limit the total amount of pollution, but rather permitted the discharge of pollutants in proportion to the production of the mill.
In 1991, the federal government responded to public pressure by introducing a regulatory scheme that required mills to implement secondary treatment systems and abide by limits to control the discharge of certain harmful pollutants, including dioxins and furans.
In 1992, the Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations set minimum standards.
BACKGROUND
PARAMETERS
CANADIAN REGULATIONS
BACKGROUNDBACKGROUND
PARAMETERS
MAXIMUM BDO AND MAXIMUM QUANTITY OF SUSPENDED SOLIDS AUTHORIZED FOR MILLS.
WATER REGULATIONS
AIR REGULATIONS
THERE ARE NO LEGALLY BINDING CANADIAN FEDERAL OR PROVINCIAL REGULATIONS FOR AIR EMISSIONS FROM PULP MILLS FOR AMBIENT AIR QUALITY.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Except where an authorization or transitional authorization is issued authorizing the deposit of BDO matter or suspended solids, the maximum BDO of all BDO matter and the maximum quantity of all suspended solids that may be deposited in the case of a mill is determined by:
In respect of any 24-hour period, the formula:
In respect of any month the formula:
RPRFQd *5.2*
RPRDFQm *5.1**
Where :F = is equal to a factor of 5 in respect of BDO and 7.5 in respect of suspended solids, expressed in kilograms per tonne of finished product.RPR = is the reference production rate.D = number of days in a month.
Original source: Department of Justice Canada
MAXIMUM BDO AND MAXIMUM QUANTITY OF SUSPENDED SOLIDS AUTHORIZED FOR MILLS.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
3.4.3 GENERAL REGULATIONS
Parameter Maximum valuePM 100 for recovery furnaceHydrogen sulfide 15 (for lime kilns)Total sulfur emittedSulfite mills 1.5 kg/t ADPKraft and other 1.0 kg/t ADPNitrogen oxides 2 kg/t ADP
Parameter Maximum valuepH 6--9
COD
300 mg/l and 15 kg/t for kraft andCTMP pulp mills; 700 mg/l and40kg/t of sulfite pulp mills; 10 mg/land 5kg/t of mechanical andrecycled fiber pulp; 250 mg/l forpaper mills
AOX
40 mg/l and 2 kg/t (aim for 8 mg/land 0.4 kg/t and retrofits and for 4mg/l and 0.2 kg/t for new mills)and 4 mg/l for paper mills
Total phosphorus 0.05 kg/tTotal nitrogen 0.4 kg/tTemperature < 3 C
Emissions levels for the design and operation of each project must be established throuth the environmental assessment process on the basis of country legislation and the Pollution Prevention Handbook, which establishes the following.
Air Emissions(milligrams per normal cubic meter)
Liquid effluents
Source: Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook 1998. World Bank Group. P 395-399
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
3.5 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY
In the kraft pulping process, highly emissions of reduced sulfur compounds, measured as total reduced sulfur (TRS) and including hydrogen sulfide, methyl marcaptan, dimethyl sulfide, and dimethyl disulfide, are emitted.
Sulfur oxide emissions are scrubbed with slightly alkaline solutions.
The reduced sulfur-compounds gases are collected using headers, hoods, and venting equipment.
Condensates from the digester relief condenser and evaporation of black liquor are stripped of reduced sulfur compounds.
Stripper overhead and noncondensable are incinerated in a lime kiln or a combustion unit.
Gas treatment
More information:www.jrfindia.com More information:
www.wesinc.com
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
3.5 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY
Wastewater treatment
To remove suspended solids:
• Neutralization• Screening• Sedimentation• Flotation
To remove the organic content:
• Activated sludge• Aerated lagoons• Anaerobic fermentation
Solid waste treatment
Solid waste treatment steps include dewatering of sludge and combustion in an incinerator, bark boiler, or fossil-fuel-fired boiler.
More information:www.sequencertech.com
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
TIER 2 : STUDY CASE
This tier will demonstrate the relevance of Process Integration for specific examples of key processes in the Pulp and Paper Industry as well as in Refineries.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
STUDY CASE 1
KRAFT PULPING PROCESS
As we saw in Tier 1, the Pulping Process can be accomplished by chemical, semichemical or mechanical methods. About 80% of the wood pulp in the United States is produced through the kraft chemical pulping process.
A environmental problem associated with the kraft process is the atmospheric emission of considerable quantities of hydrogen sulfide. The serious health and environmental problems of discharging hydrogen sulfide to the atmosphere call for effective sulfur-waste reduction processes in a pulp and paper plant.
The purpose of this study case is to employ the Mass Exchange Network methodology to develop an optimal design of recycle/reuse networks for reducing the emission of hydrogen sulfide for pulp and paper plants.
(Dunn and El-Halwagi, 1993)
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
LimeContaminatedCondensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
Lime
Wood chips, containing ligning, cellulose and hemicellulose are added to white liquor (NaOH, Na2S, Na2CO3). The chips are cooked to solubilize the lignin.
ContaminatedCondensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
Lime
The solubilized lignin leaves as black liquor, leaving the cellulose and hemicellulose which are the constituents of pulp.Contaminated
Condensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
Lime
It is sent to the bleaching of papermaking process, depending on the end product desired.
ContaminatedCondensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
Lime
The main constituents of White Liquor are: NaOH, Na2S, Na2CO3, Na2SO4, Na2S2O3, NaCl, water.Contaminated
Condensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
LimeContaminatedCondensate
The Weak Black Liquor is processed through a series of evaporators to increase the solid content from 15% to 70% approximately.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
Lime
The Strong Black Liquor is incinerated to supply energy for the pulping process and to form inorganic smelt.Contaminated
Condensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
Lime
Na2CO3 and Na2SContaminatedCondensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
Lime
Smelt is dissolved in water to form the Green Liquor.
ContaminatedCondensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
LimeNaOH, Na2S, Na2CO3 and water.
ContaminatedCondensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
Lime
Lime (CaO) is converted to CaOH2 in presence of water.
ContaminatedCondensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
Lime
CaOH2 reacts with Na2CO3 to form NaOH and a CaCO3 as precipitant.
ContaminatedCondensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
Lime
The CaCO3 is heated to regenerate the CaO and release CO2.
ContaminatedCondensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
DESCRIPTION OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
Lime
NaOH, Na2S, NaCO3 and water.
ContaminatedCondensate
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Digester
EMISSION SOURCES OF THE KRAFT PROCESS
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Weak Black Liquor
Strong Black Liquor
SmeltGreenLiquor
Lime Mud
White Liquor
LimeAir Stripping
ContaminatedCondensate
AirWastewater
Air Emission
Evaporators
RecoveryFurnace
AirStripping
R2
R1
R3
Three major sources in the Kraft Process are Responsible for the majority of the H2S emissions.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
INTERNAL MASS SEPARATING AGENTS
Digester
Washers
Evaporators
RecoveringFurnace
DissolvingTank
Slaker
Causticizers
White Liquor Clarifier
Lime Kiln
CHIPS
PULP
Strong Black Liquor
Smelt
Lime Mud
White Liquor
LimeAir Stripping
ContaminatedCondensate
AirWastewater
Air Emission
Weak Black Liquor
GreenLiquor
S2Weak Black
Liquor
S3Green Liquor
S1 White Liquor
Several Mass-Exchange operations such as absorption or adsorption can be employed to reduce the H2S emissions.
Three liquid streams that already exist in the plant (process MSAs) can be used.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Three external MSAs will be considered potential candidates for recovering H2S:
• S4, Diethanolamine (DEA)
• S5, Activated Carbon
• S6, 30 wt% Hot potassium carbonate solution
EXTERNAL MASS SEPARATING AGENTS
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
REACTIVE
MASS-EXCHANGE
NETWORK
Recovery Furnace Emissions, R1
Evaporator Emissions, R2
R3, Air Stripping Emissions
R1 R2 R3To atmosphere
White Liquor, S1
Green Liquor, S2
Black Liquor, S3
DEA, S4
Activated Carbon, S5
Hot K2CO3 solution, S6
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
REACTIVE
MASS-EXCHANGE
NETWORK
Recovery Furnace Emissions, R1
Evaporator Emissions, R2
R3, Air Stripping Emissions
R1 R2 R3To atmosphere
White Liquor, S1
Green Liquor, S2
Black Liquor, S3
DEA, S4
Activated Carbon, S5
Hot K2CO3 solution, S6
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
Causticizer DigesterDissolving TankDigester SlakerEvaporators
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
DATA FOR THE KRAFT PROCESS PROBLEM
Stream
Emissions stream
description
Gi
m3/s
yis
kmol/m3
yit
kmol/m3
R1 Recovery furnace 170.000 3.08 x 10-5 2.1 x 10-7
R2 Evaporator 0.433 8.20 x 10-5 2.1 x 10-7
R3 Air stripping 465.800 1.19 x 10-5 2.1 x 10-7
Stream Stream description
Max. available flowrate
m3/s
x js
kmol/m3
x jt
kmol/m3
S1 White liquor 0.040 3.2 x 10-1 3.10 x 100
S2 Green liquor 0.049 2.9 x 10-1 1.29 x 100
S3 Black liquor 0.100 0.2 x 10-1 1.00 x 10-1
S4 DEA 2.0 x 10-6 2 x 10-2
S5 Activated carbon 1.0 x 10-6 1.7 x 10-3
S6 Hot KCO3 solution 0.3 x 10-2 2.8 x 10-1
DATA FOR THE WASTE STREAMS
DATA FOR THE MASS SEPARATING AGENTS
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
The solution of this problem will follow two different approaches:
ALGEBRAIC GRAPHICAL
DESIGN METHODOLOGY
We are looking forward the potentials for waste reduction in the Kraft Process by establishing tradeoffs between environmental and economic objectives in order to obtain the optimal configuration for a Waste-reduction system.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
GR
APH
ICA
L APPR
OA
CH
INTERPRET THE RESULTS
These are the main steps that we will follow to find an optimal design of recycle/reuse networks for reducing the emission of hydrogen sulfide from a pulp and paper plant using a GRAPHICAL APPROACH.
PLOT RICH STREAM
OBTAIN PINCH POINT
PLOT LEANSTREAM
CREATEONE-TO-ONE
CORRESPONDENCE
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.01
0.00E+00 1.00E-05 2.00E-05 3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 6.00E-05 7.00E-05 8.00E-05 9.00E-05y
Ma
ss
E
xc
ha
ng
ed
km
ol H
2S
/s
0.00544
0.00907
0.00904
R3
R2
R1
y1,2,3t y3
s y1s y2
s
GR
APH
ICA
L APPR
OA
CH
RICH COMPOSITE STREAM
The first step is to plot the mass exchanged or each rich stream versus its
composition.
Each stream is represented as an arrow whose tail corresponds to its supply composition and its head to its target composition.
The slope of the arrows will be equal to the stream flowrate and the vertical distance between the tail and the head of each arrow represents the mass of pollutant that is lost by each rich stream:
MRi=Gi(yis – yi
t), i=1,2,…,NR.
Each arrow should be placed starting with the waste stream having the lowest target composition.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexasG
RA
PH
ICA
L APPR
OA
CH
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.01
0.00E+00 1.00E-05 2.00E-05 3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 6.00E-05 7.00E-05 8.00E-05 9.00E-05
Ma
ss
E
xc
ha
ng
ed
km
ol H
2S
/s
y
The rich composite stream is obtained by applying superposition to the rich streams.
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.01
0.00E+00 1.00E-05 2.00E-05 3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 6.00E-05 7.00E-05 8.00E-05 9.00E-05
Mas
s E
xch
ang
edkm
ol H
2S
/s
This rich composite stream represents the cumulative mass of the pollutant lost by all the streams.
y
RICH COMPOSITE STREAM
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexasG
RA
PH
ICA
L APPR
OA
CH
The second step is to generate a one-to-one correspondence among compositions of the three waste streams and the six MSAs.
Consider a waste stream i, and and MSA, j, for which equilibrium is given by:
yi*= fi(xj*)
For any mass-exchange operation to be thermodynamically feasible, some conditions must be satisfied:
xj<xj*and/or yi>yi*
To generate the one-to-one correspondence, we use the following equation:
y=f(xj+εj)
Where εj is the minimum allowable composition difference, which means that we are adding a driving force to allow mass transfer.
A deep explanation of these concepts is given in Module 3.
ONE-TO-ONE CORRESPONDENCE
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexasG
RA
PH
ICA
L APPR
OA
CH
MSA1White liquor
MSA2Green liquor
Equilibrium equation y1= 2.0402 x 10-9(10)1.1786x1 y2= 2.5763 x 10-9(10)2.8136x2
Adding the driving force
y1= 2.0402 x 10-9(10)1.1786(x1+ε1)
ε1 = 7.64y2= 2.5763 x 10-9(10)2.8136(x2+ε2)
ε2 = 3.20
Supply correspondence
y1s= 2.0402 x 10-
9(10)1.1786(0.32+7.64)
y1s= 4.91
y2s= 2.5763 x 10-
9(10)2.8136(0.29+3.20)
y2s= 17.00
Target correspondence
y1t= 2.0402 x 10-
9(10)1.1786(3.10+7.64)
y1t= 9186
y2t= 2.5763 x 10-
9(10)2.8136(1.29+3.20)
y2t= 11068
Some examples of the generation of the one-to-one correspondence are the following:
The equilibrium equation for the MSA3 (Black liquor) is:
y3=352.8 x30.71512
ONE-TO-ONE CORRESPONDENCE
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexasG
RA
PH
ICA
L APPR
OA
CH
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.00E+00 1.00E-05 2.00E-05 3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 6.00E-05 7.00E-05 8.00E-05 9.00E-05 1.00E-040.32 3.1
0.29 1.29
0.02 0.01
y
x1
x2
x3
Ma
ss
E
xc
ha
ng
ed
km
ol H
2S
/s
The mass of pollutant that can be gained by each process MSA is plotted versus the composition scale
of that MSA
Mass of pollutant that can be gained by each MSA is calculated:
MSj= Ljc (xj
t – xjs) j=1,2,…,NSP
Also in this case, the arrows represent each of the process MSA, being the tail the supply composition
and the head the target composition.
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.00E+00 1.00E-05 2.00E-05 3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 6.00E-05 7.00E-05 8.00E-05 9.00E-05 1.00E-04
Ma
ss
E
xc
ha
ng
ed
km
ol H
2S
/s
y
Once again, we used the diagonal rule of superposition to obtain the cumulative mass
of the pollutant gained by all the MSAs.
LEAN COMPOSITE STREAM
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexasG
RA
PH
ICA
L A
PPR
OA
CH
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.00E+00 1.00E-05 2.00E-05 3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 6.00E-05 7.00E-05 8.00E-05 9.00E-05 1.00E-04
y
Ma
ss
E
xc
ha
ng
ed
km
ol H
2S
/s
Integrated Mass Exchange
PICH POINT
PinchPoint
The next step is to plot both composite streams on the same diagram.
To guarantee thermodynamic feasibility the lean composite should be above and left of the waste composite stream.
The lean composite stream can be slid down until it touches the waste composite stream. The point where the two composite streams touch is called “mass exchange pinch point”.
Lean Composite
Stream
Rich Composite
Stream
The vertical overlap between the two composite streams is the maximum amount of the pollutant that can be transferred from the waste streams to the process MSAs.
ExcessMass
Exchanged
The vertical distance referred as Excess Mass Exchanged corresponds to the capacity of the process MSAs to remove pollutants that cannot be used because of thermodynamic infeasibility.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
ALG
EB
RA
IC A
PPR
OA
CH
CREATE ONE-TO ONECORRESPONDENCE
MASS-EXCHANGECASCADEDIAGRAM
TABLE OF EXCHANGEABLE
LOADS (TEL)
COMPOSITIONINTERVALDIAGRAM
The Algebraic Approach follows these steps:
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexasA
LGEB
RA
IC A
PPR
OA
CH
COMPOSITION-INTERVAL DIAGRAM (CID)
The CID is a useful tool for visualizing the mass exchange insuring thermodynamic feasibility.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexasA
LGEB
RA
IC A
PPR
OA
CH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
82000
17.0
210
9186
11068
11900
30800
4.86
RICH STREAMS LEAN PROCESS STREAMS
y x 109 x2 x1
COMPOSITION-INTERVAL DIAGRAM (CID)
1. The composition scale for the waste stream is established.2. Corresponding composition scales for the process MSAs are created.
INTER
VA
LS
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexasA
LGEB
RA
IC A
PPR
OA
CH
COMPOSITION-INTERVAL DIAGRAM (CID)
3. Each process stream is represented as a vertical arrow
The tail of each arrow represents its supply composition and its head represents its target composition.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
82000
17.0
210
9186
11068
11900
30800
4.86
RICH STREAMS LEAN PROCESS STREAMS
y x 109 x2 x1
S3
R1
R3
R2
S1
S2
Horizontal lines are drawn at the heads and tails of the
arrows to define composition intervals.
INTER
VA
LS
1
2
3
4
6
5
7
These intervals are numerated From top to bottom.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexasA
LGEB
RA
IC A
PPR
OA
CH
TABLE OF EXCHANGEABLE LOADS (TEL)
By constructing the TEL, we want to determine the mass-exchange loads of the process streams in each composition interval.
The exchangeable lead of each waste stream with passes through each interval is defined as:
Wi,kR = Gi(yk-1 – yk)
W1,1R = 0.433(0.000082-
0.0000308)W1,2
R = 117(0.0000308-0.0000119)W2,2
R = 0.433(0.0000308-0.0000119)
Wj,kS = Lj(xj.k-1 – xj,k)
W1,4S = 0.049(1.29-1.261)
W1,5S = 0.04(3.1-1.708)
W2,5S = 0.049(1.261-0.678)
WkR = Σ Wi,k
R
W2R = W1,2
R + W2,2R =
0.0022
WkS = Σ Wj,k
S
W5S = W1,5
S + W2,5S = 0.0842
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexasA
LGEB
RA
IC A
PPR
OA
CH
k
Residual Mass fromPreceding Interval
δ k-1
δ k
Residual Mass toSubsequent Interval
Material Balance of the key pollutant should be done for each interval.
TABLE OF EXCHANGEABLE LOADS (TEL)
Mass RecoveredFrom Waste
Streams
WkR
Mass TransferredTo MSAs
WkS
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexasA
LGEB
RA
IC A
PPR
OA
CH
TABLE OF EXCHANGEABLE LOADS (TEL)
A negative δk indicates that the capacity of the process leans streams at that level is greater than the load of the waste streams.
The most negative δk is the excess capacity of the process MSAs when removing the pollutant.
0
0.00002 1 0
0.00002
0.002219 2 0
0.00224
0.000477 3 0
0.00272
0.001106 4 0
0.00382
0.005235 5 0.05568
-0.04662
0 6 0.03708
-0.08370
0 7 0.01844
-0.10214
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexasA
LGEB
RA
IC A
PPR
OA
CH
TABLE OF EXCHANGEABLE LOADS (TEL)
On the revised cascade diagram the location at which the residual mass was the most negative should be zero. It corresponds to the pinch point.
PINCH POINT
0
2.22E-05 1 0
0.00002
0.002219 2 0
0.00224
0.000477 3 0
0.00272
0.001106 4 0
0.00382
0.005235 5 0.004608
0.00445
0 6 0.003068
0.00138
0 7 0.001526
0.00
The excess capacity of the process MSA should be reduced by lowering the flowrate.
The new flowrate is calculated as follows:
m3/s
Another TEL should be constructed after removing the excess capacity of the MSA.
003259.032.010.3
102.104.0
E
L
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Since the graphical approach, we saw that the pollutant could be removed just by using one MSA, so there is no need of a network. This problem has some different solutions that could be taken depending on how much we want to spend. The following figure is one solution, in which some material balance should be done in order to give the right flowrate to each absorber.
Absorber1
Absorber2
Absorber3
R1 R2 R3
White Liquor
117 m3/s3.08e-5 kmol/m3
465.8 m3/s1.19e-5 kmol/m3
0.44 m3/s8.20e-5 kmol/m3
2.1e-7kmol/m3 2.1e-7kmol/m32.1e-7kmol/m3
0.0158 m3/s0.320 kmol/m3
1.56e-4 m3/s0.320 kmol/m3
0.0158 m3/s0.320 kmol/m3
0.547 kmol/m3 0.547 kmol/m3 0.547 kmol/m3
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Absorber
R1 R2 R3
White Liquor
117 m3/s3.08e-5 kmol/m3
465.8 m3/s1.19e-5 kmol/m3
0.44 m3/s8.20e-5 kmol/m3
581.24 m3/s2.1e-7 kmol/m3 0.00326 m3/s
0.32 kmol/m3
3.10 kmol/m3
Another way of achieve this task is the following, in which the rich streams are for final disposal and can be mixed and treated as one stream, also, his arrange is more desirable in terms of costs because just one unit is needed.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
STUDY CASE 2
PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTES
A major concern in refineries is the release of phenols, although described as this, the category may include a variety of similar chemical compounds among which are polyphenols, chlorophenols, and phenoxyacids. The concern is because of their toxicity to aquatic life and the high oxygen demand they sponsor in the streams that receive it. Phenols are toxic to fish and also they can cause taste and odor problems when present in potable water.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
The next study case applies some of the skills of Process Integration to show the methodology once again and make it more understandable. This case was taken from El-Halwagi, M. “Pollution Prevention through Process Integration”, 1997.
“The process generates two major sources of phenolic wastewater; one from the catalytic cracking unit and the other from the visbreaking system. Two technologies can be used to remove phenol from R1 and R2: solvent extraction using light gas oil S1 (a process MSA) and adsorption using activated carbon S2(an external MSA). A minimum allowable composition difference, εj, of 0.01 can be used for the two MSAs.
By constructing a pinch diagram for the problem, find the minimum cost of MSAs needed to remove phenol from R1 and R2. How do you characterize the point at which both composite streams touch? Is it a true pinch point?”
PROBLEM STATEMENT
StreamG i
kg/syi
s yit
R1 8.00 0.1 0.01R2 6.00 0.08 0.01
Rich stream
StreamLc
j
kg/sxj
s xjt mj bj
cj
$/kgS1 10.00 0.01 0.02 2.00 0.00 0.00S2 0.00 0.11 0.02 0.00 0.08
MSAs
DATA
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
Stabilizer
At m
osp
her i
cD
isti
llat i
on
VacuumDistillation
SweeteningUnit
Visbreaker
Hydrotreating
CatalyticCracking
Solvent Extraction and
Dewaxing
LPH and Gas
Gasoline
Naphta
Middle Distillates
Gas Oil
Lube-BaseStocks
The first step in a petroleum refinery is to preheat the crude, then it is washed with water to remove various salts.
Tre
ati
ng a
nd B
lend
ing
Refinery fuel gas
Refinery fuel oil
Industrial fuels
Asphalts
Greases
Lube oils
Aviation fuels
Diesels
Heating oils
LPG
Gasoline
Solvents
PROCESS DESCRIPTIONSweet Gasoline
Middle Distillates
Gas
Gasoline
Light Gas Oil
Wastewater, R1
Lube Oil
Waxes
Gasoline, Naphtha and Middle distillates
Fuel Oil
Asphalt
Wastewater, R2
Gas oil and heavy stocks are fed to a catalytic-cracking unit to be converted to lower molecular weight fractions. The main waste stream from this process is the condensate from stripping in the fractionating column. This condensate commonly contains ammonia, phenols and sulfides as contaminants, this has to be stripped to remove ammonia and sulfides. The bottom product of the stripper must be treated to eliminate phenols.
The light gas oil leaving the fractionator can serve as a lean-oil solvent in a phenol extraction process, being this a beneficiary mass transfer because in addition to purify water, phenols can act as oxidation inhibitors and as color stabilizers.
The main objectives of visbreaking are to reduce the viscosity and the pour points of vacuum-tower bottoms and to increase the feed stocks to catalytic cracking. The source of wastewater is the overhead accumulator on the fractionator, where water is separated from the hydrocarbon vapor. This water contains phenols, ammonia an sulfides
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
R1
R2
y1t, y2
t y2
s y1s
Mas
s ex
chan
ged
1. PLOT THE RICH STREAM
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
1. PLOT THE RICH STREAM
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
R1
R2
y1t, y2
t y1 y2s
Ma
ss e
xch
an
ge
d
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
2. ONE-TO-ONE CORRESPONDANCE
y = m(x+ε) + b
y1s = 2(0.01+0.01) =
0.04
y1t = 2(0.02+0.01) =
0.06
y2s = 0.02(0.00+0.01) =
0.0002
y2t = 0.02(0.11+0.01) =
0.0024
To generate the one-to-one correspondence, we use the following equation:
y=f(xj+εj)
Where εj is the minimum allowable composition difference. ε j=0.01
In this case the equilibrium equation is linear:
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
MS1
y
x1
x2S2
S1
3. PLOT THE LEAN STREAM
x1s x1
t
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
Ma
ss e
xch
an
ge
d
y
x1
x2
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Stream 1 would not be useful, since external MSAs should be used before and after using this stream. That means that this is not a true pinch point.
4. OBTAIN THE PINCH POINT
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
Mas
s ex
chan
ged
0.1
5. INTERPRET THE RESULTS
y
Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 3
The lean stream can be moved to remove the pollutant in another range of composition, but still three units would be needed.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
5. INTERPRET THE RESULTS
y
x1
x2
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Unit 1
Unit 2
If the lean stream remove the pollutant since its higher composition, just 2 units are needed.
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
Mas
s ex
chan
ged
Mass removed by Process MSA
Mass removed by External MSA
y
5. INTERPRET THE RESULTS
A&MA&M A&MA&M
UniversityUniversity
TexasTexas
•Alan P. Rossiter. Waste Minimization through Process Design. pp 43-49. McGraw Hill. 1995.
•Nicholas P. Cheremisinoff, Handbook of Pollution Prevention Practices. pp 269-313, 353-358. Marcel Dekker Inc. 2001.
•The World Bank Group. Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook 1998. pp 377-381, 395-399. 1998
•El-Halwagi, M. M. Pollution Prevention through Process Integration. Academic Press. 1997.
•Dunn R., El-Halwagi, M. M. Optimal Recycle/Reuse Policies for Minimizing the Wastes of Pulp and Paper Plants. J. Environ. Sci. Health, A28(1), 217-234 (1993).
•El-Halwagi, M.M., El-Halwagi, A.M., Manousiouthakis, V. Optimal Design of the Phenolization Networks for Petroleum-Refinery Wastes. Trans IChemE, Vol 70, Part B, pp 131-139. August 1992.
•Environmental Update #12, Hazardous Substance Research Centers/Southwest Outreach Program, June 2003.
•Abdallah S. Jum’ah, president and CEO, Saudi Aramco. Petroleum and social responsibility: and agenda for action. News Feature. First bread volume 20. 10 October 2002.
•Energy and Environmental Profile of the U.S. Petroleum Refining Industry. December 1998. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Industrial Technologies
•EPA Office of Compliance Sector Notebook Project, Profile of the Petroleum Refining Industry, September 1995.
•National Pollutant Release Inventory (Canada)
•2001 Toxic Release Inventory Executive Summary (US)
•Input to the AMG Working Group Studying the Impact of Greenhouse Gas Abatement on the Competitiveness of Canadian Industries. Pulp, Paper and Paperboark Mills. Manufacturing Industries Branch. Industry Canada. March 11, 2002
•Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e Informatica (Mexico)