allen rockefeller campaigning for the new world order

8/8/2019 Allen Rockefeller Campaigning for the New World Order

1/18

ROCKEFELLER

Campaigning For The New World OrderGary Allen, a graduate of Stanford Uni-versity, is the author of several best-sellingbooks, including Communist Revolution InThe Streets; Nixon's Palace Guard; NoneDare Call It Conspiracy; and, RichardNixon: The Man Behind The Mask, thedefinitive study of the ambition and

conspiratorial activities of our currentPresident. Mr. Allen, a former instructor ofhistory and English, is active in numeroushumanitarian, anti-Communist, andbusiness enterprises. A film writer, author,and journalist, he is a Contributing Editorto AMERICAN OPINION.

TIE down the safety valves, wire the

accelerator to the floor, break out theHadacol and drink a toast to P.T. Bar-num.This is it, folks. It is time for NelsonRockefeller's last stand. (And maybeAmerica's.) You see, Nelson Rockefeller ofNew York is sixty-six years old, and eventhough he looks a decade younger, theelection of 1976 will be his last chance tobecome President. By 1980, the former boywonder of the "Liberal" Republicans will beseventy-two years old an age almostuniversally considered too advanced for thePresidency.

Time passes even more effectively thanBob Griese. It seems like only yesterdaythat Nelson Rockefeller was the odds-onfavorite for capturing the 1964 G.O.P.Presidential nomination. Then he divorcedhis wife for a married woman and the

ensuing scandal knocked his Presidentialaspirations into a cocked top hat. But, it's along, long time from May (1964) toDecember (1976), and the days grow short(for seeking political office) when youreach sixty-six. It's now or

never, and the deluge of propaganda hasbegun.

In order to free himself for an all-outcampaign for the Presidency, NelsonRockefeller resigned his post as governor ofNew York on December 12, 1973. Imagineresigning as chief executive of the nation's

economically most powerful state a jobfor which he had arduously campaignedfour times, spending tens of millions ofdollars! No Rockefeller would take such astep frivolously.

The former New York governor says heresigned in order to head up a factfindingcommission. Does anybody believe him?Only those who believe the moon is made of

refried beans. Not that the commissioninvolved is small potatoes. It originallycarried the grandiloquent title NationalCommission On The Future of America InIts Third Century, later modified to NationalCommission On Critical Choices. This"bipartisan" palanquin is supposed to bearacademic and political gurus to the heightsof Mt. Olympus, there in the clean, pure airof selfless idealism to arrive at "a clearersense of national purpose."

Conservatives were quick to point outthat the very idea of a national purpose is acollectivist concept. A national purposerequires national planning, which by defi-nition supersedes individual planning. Butin a free country the purposes of individualscome first, and it is the role of thegovernment to protect the right of indi-

viduals to pursue their own goals. As usual,nonetheless, such objections byConservatives were scarcely heard amongthe hurrahs emanating from the collect-ivists of the mass media.

1


2/18

The New York Times of December 12,1973, provides us with some backgroundon the origins of the new RockefellerCommission:

The Commission for CriticalChoices, formed last month by the

Governor at the request of President Nixon, is the outgrowth of a studycommission first proposed by Mr.Rockefeller last December. At that time,the Governor announced that he would"undertake a major inquiry into the roleof the modem state in our changingFederal system. "

In other words, Nelson Rockefeller re-signed as governor of New York to head aCommission, to set collectivist goals, thatwas created by Richard Nixon at Mr.Rockefeller's own suggestion.

The Commission is actually two studygroups; one on critical choices and theother on water quality. According to thesame issue of the Times: "The two national

commissions for which GovernorRockefeller is resigning to devote his fullenergies are composed of leaders of gov-ernment, education and industry, each witha projected budget of $20 million and eachexpected to complete its work within twoyears."

Yes, that's forty million dollars.The forty-member Commission On

Critical Choices (a million dollars a mem-ber?) includes a mixture of Establishmentwheelhorses and flunkies, including VicePresident Jerry Ford, Secretary of StateHenry Kissinger, Secretary of the TreasuryGeorge Shultz, Senate Majority LeaderMike Mansfield, Senate Minority LeaderHugh Scott, and House Majority LeaderThomas O'Neill. Others on the panel are

Daniel Moynihan, chief pitchman forPresident Nixon's Family Assistance Plan;Joseph Kirkland, secretary-treasurer of theA.F.L.-C.I.O.; John Knowles, president ofthe Rockefeller Foundation; SolLinowitz, the manic

"Liberal" and former head of Xerox; and,William S. Paley, chairman of the board ofC.B.S.*

The staff of the Committee is even moreloaded with "Liberals" than is theCommittee itself. And as is usually the casewith operations of this sort, the report will

be written by the staff. Henry Diamond, aRipon Republican, has taken over as theCommission's executive director at fiftythousand dollars per year.** Equallyindicative of the panel's prejudice is the factthat its study director is Stephen Berger,who will select those in charge of preparingthe various studies to be released by theCommission. Berger is a "Liberal"

Democrat and was a campaign manager in1970 for the radical Richard Ottinger wholost to James Buckley in the 1970 Senaterace in New York.

The final report will be released shortlybefore the Republican National Conventionin 1976. The media will then tell us thatChairman Rockefeller is the onlyPresidential candidate who could carry out

the recommendations of this "prestigiouspanel."

The Commission StrategyDespite the fact that nobody more

sophisticated than Baby Snooks believeshim, Nelson Rockefeller denies that heresigned as governor of New York to headthe Commission as a strategic move in hislatest campaign for the Presidency. "Myonly regret is that my undertaking thesetasks has been interpreted as a political

*Certainly no one was very surprised that C.B.S.carried a two-hour propaganda show on "TheRockefellers" during prime viewing time on Friday,

December twenty-eighth. For a political candidate tobuy that kind of time would cost an astronomical sum.But Rocky has friends. It didn't cost him a nickel.**The Ripon (not Ripoff) Society is a small group of

young and very "Liberal" intellectuals out of IvyLeague schools who bear no more philosophical

resemblance to traditional Republicans than doesGeorge McGovern. Their every pronouncement isnonetheless given nationwide publicity by the press. Asit happens, the Rockefellers finance the Riponoperation.

2


3/18

maneuver to seek the Presidency," hedeclares. "I am not a candidate fornomination for the Presidency or for anyother political office. Whether I willbecome a candidate in the future, I do notknow. I should like to keep my optionsopen." But, he adds, "under no

circumstances would I consider such amove before the latter part of 1975, or whileI am chairman of these commissions." Theresigning governor said of the 1976election: "That seems far away."

There are, however, more than a fewpolitical advantages to the move. Accordingto U.S. News & World Report, Rockefeller"smilingly said that as chairman of the

commission he will be traveling all over thecountry. It was not lost on others that thiswill provide the Governor with manyopportunities to seek widespread support."

The resignation strategy also relievesNelson Rockefeller of the risk of runningfor an unprecedented fifth term as gover-nor. As one of his advisors observed, "If heloses for governor, he's done in '76 in oneday." And winning the governorship wouldbe anything but a sure thing despite pastsuccesses. Voters might be cynical of afifth-term race as a stratagem for anothertry at the Presidency. In the past,Rockefeller has benefitted from very weakopponents in a state with an overwhelmingDemocratic majority. There is no guaranteethat such would be the case this timearound. Also, New York is a fiscal disaster,

and voters might take revenge onRockefeller for tax hikes he instituted afterpromising in his last campaign that hewould not do so.

Yet another reason for avoiding thegubernatorial race is Watergate. The publicnow thoroughly distrusts professionalpoliticians. As John Goldman wrote ofRockefeller's advisors in the Los Angeles

Times for August 17, 1973: "They believethe most effective way to seek thePresidency in the Watergate era might be asa private citizen-campaigner."

Also among the practical reasons Nel-

son Rockefeller must go through thecharade of not being a candidate is money.You see, he expects that the federaltreasury will come up with millions tofinance his campaign-Commission. DaddyOilbucks and the family have alreadypumped in a million from the Rockefeller

Brothers Fund, one of their tax-free piggybanks, and you are expected to produce the$39 million balance. If NelsonRockefeller were an

Nelson Rockefeller sent Kissinger to Mr. Nixon.

avowed candidate, it would be too trans-parent that you were being asked to financea political campaign. But, a search for a

"national purpose," that's a different matter.Barnum would have loved it.In the meantime, the former governor

can travel the country giving speeches toimportant civic and political gatherings,appearing on television, addressing himselfto the issues facing the nation all thewhile insisting that he is not doing it as acandidate, but as the public spiritedchairman of the Rockefeller-sponsoredNational Commission On Critical ChoicesFor Americans.

And, there is yet another angle. TheFederal Election Campaign Act, which tookeffect in 1972, provides that no candidatefor President or Vice President can usemore than fifty thousand dollars of his own(or his family's) money in his campaign.This is yet another explanation for

Rockefeller's insistence that he won't makeup his mind about running for thenomination until late in 1975 - virtually onthe eve of the primaries. This gives him twoyears for heavy spending before

3


4/18

the fifty-thousand-dollar limitation can beapplied.

Certainly the Rockefellers are notpenurious when it comes to bankrollingpolitical campaigns. The Rockefeller familyis said to have made campaign contri-butions of $25 million, and probably

"considerably more," between 1952 and1970. On May 4, 1972, United PressInternational reported: "This estimateincluded $20 million to $22 million infamily contributions to Gov. Nelson A.Rockefeller's failing bid for the Republicanpresidential nomination in 1964 and hisfour successful campaigns for thegovernorship of New York."

According to the Citizens ResearchFoundation, some $4.5 million of familymoney went into Nelson's 1970 guberna-torial campaign. That kind of spending forthe Rockefellers is the equivalent of mybuying a cup of coffee for a friend. If needbe, I can even afford a second round. But itis pleasant when somebody else pays for themain course, and the Rockefellers are

delighted to let the taxpayers pick up thecheck for brother Nelson's campaign-Commission.

So Nelson Rockefeller has a well-financed vehicle for pursuing the nomina-tion. But does he really want it? After all,following his unsuccessful pursuit of thebrass ring in 1968, he announced that "theold avidity is gone." Has the "old avidity"returned?

Is a four-pound robin fat? Does KingKong like big bananas?

The New York Times of December 16,1973, says that when Nelson Rockefellerwas asked when he first thought of runningfor the White House, he replied:

*It is now obvious that the Goldwater of 1964 neverexisted. Conservatives fell in love with his battery oftalented and ideologically Conservative ghost writers. Itwas those ghost writers in the sky (among whom were

such able men as Brent Bozell, ghost ofConscience Of AConservative) that captured the nation's imagination.Which explains why Barry Goldwater never seemedquite so sharp in person as he did in print.

"Ever since I was a kid. After all, when youthink of what I had, what else was there toaspire to?" It seems to be far too commonamong those born to super wealth that theycrave super power.

The Great Charade

Rockefeller does have some seriousproblems, however. One of the biggest ishis reputation for being a McGovernite"Liberal" in a party whose workers still

pine for the Barry Goldwater of1964.*Life magazine of March 29, 1968, de-scribed Nelson's dilemma:

The most important one [of Nelson

Rockefeller's political problems] was the basic dislike which the Republicanparty held and still holds for him. From the start of his career in government, he was regarded as a New Dealer turned traitor to his class and as a spender; a quarter-century ago crusty old-line Republicans were sneering,"Nelson Roosevelt!"

And the Republican faithful well re-member what Rocky said about Barry andhis Conservative supporters back in thosehopeful days of 1964. They remember thatit wasn't the battleship L.B.J. whichtorpedoed the good ship Goldwater, but asubmarine from his own navy. Rocky andhis entourage called the Barrybackers

everything but human beings. Nobody whoattended the bloodletting at the SanFrancisco Cow Palace is likely ever toforget it. At least, so one would think. ThusRocky's number one job has been toconvince the rank and file of his own partythat he is the New Nelson, faster than aspeeding welfare mother, able to leap tallbureaucracies at a single bound. NelsonRockefeller has even dusted off some ofBarry Gold-water's 1964 speeches and isbusy delivering them out on the hustings.As the Wall Street Journal reported onDecember 4, 1973:

4


5/18

Nevertheless, there are some purely political reasons for Mr. Rockefeller'simproved standing with the party's rightwing. The most oft-mentioned is that the New Yorker, cognizant that conserva-tives dominate the party, carefully hasmoved to the right.

Indeed, Mr. Rockefeller himself lendssupport to this notion. Although hedenies any clear shift, he has beenwarming the hearts of Republican faithful around the country in recentspeeches by railing against welfarecheaters and government bureaucracy,and by promoting his tough new anti-drug law that mandates life imprison-

ment for convicted drug pushers. Afterone of these forays into Iowa, Robert Ray, that state's moderate Republicangovernor, recalls that one of the party'sold-line conservatives came up andvolunteered: "Rockefeller would make agreat President, wouldn't he?"

One can almost hear Henry Mencken,

the sage of Baltimore, guffawing in thehereafter. It was Mencken who onceobserved that no one would ever go brokeoverestimating the gullibility of theAmerican public. All Rocky had to do wasto direct his expensive speech writers tomake him sound like George Wallace witha Dartmouth education, and wait for theparty faithful to be struck by a lapse ofmemory. Rockefeller's writers know theConservative cliches as well as anyone. Ofcourse Nelson has had to resist thetemptation to laugh or sneer as he speaksthem.

In the months preceding his resignation,Governor Rockefeller toured the Midwest,hitting the rubber chicken circuit from DesMoines to Minot, playing the role of JustPlain Nelse, the barefoot boy from

Pocantico Hills. On the tour, he regaled hisaudiences with such breathtaking rhetoricas the following from his

speech in Minot, North Dakota, on No-vember 26, 1973: "We must get back to the fundamental moral and ethical values onwhich this country grew to greatness." InDes Moines on October twentieth heroared: "I decided in New York State thatwe were going to get the cheats and

chiselers off the taxpayers' back." And so itwent, with everything from appeals forstrict interpretation of the Constitution toyelps for spiritual revival and that old-timereligion.

The confidence game is working asplanned. Even poor Barry Goldwater, neverknown for his depth, has searched hispsyche and announced: "Recently

Rockefeller has moved to the right." TheWall Street Journal of December 4, 1973,says of Goldwater that Nelson is "one of histop choices for the next Republicannominee." After all, as Barry Goldwaterexplained: "I think Mr. Nixon leans towardRockefeller for the '76 nomination."

One of Rockefeller's key themes on histour through the boondocks (America west

of the Hudson) was the increasing need for"fiscal responsibility" to "bring governmentspending under control." All of this, ofcourse, is music to the ears of the G.O.P.faithful, but it is hardly the same tuneRockefeller has played as governor of NewYork since 1959. Unfortunately for Rockythe statisticians at Barron's have beenkeeping score. Editor Robert Bleibergreports in that financial newspaper forDecember 17, 1973:

... As we have said before ("RockyRoad," May 6, 1968), Nelson Rockefellerhas spent the taxpayer's money as if itwere his own. Since he moved to Albanya decade ago, New York's expenditureshave nearly tripled, while New Yorkers -local businessmen in particular - havebeen saddled with the heaviest taxburden in the U.S....

Since then, things have gone

5


6/18

from bad to worse. In the past five yearsboth the state budget and the tax burdenhave mounted by more than half. NewYorkers remain far and away the mostheavily taxed Americans, while therelative decline of the Empire State, political and economic alike, proceeds

apace...."Hello Dolly" was a great campaign

song for LBJ. To judge by the record, Nelson Rockefeller ought to run with"Buddy Can You Spare A Dime?"

Those who live and work in New YorkState will clamor to sing along Since1959, the state budget has increased from $1.9 billion to the $8.8 billion

estimated for the current fiscal year,ending March 31, 1974, not far behind New York City's disastrous financialspiral Under Governor Rockefeller,taxes have been imposed or increased atleast every other (usually non-election) year; in 1959, 1963, 1965, 1966, 1968,1969, 1971, and 1972. Since Rocky tookoffice, the maximum rate on the personal

income tax has more than doubled, from7% to a ponderable 15%; last year,moreover, a 2.5% surcharge(temporarily suspended) was decreedOver the same period, the state gasolinelevy has advanced from four to eightcents a gallon, the cigarette tax fromthree to fifteen cents per pack. A statesales tax, which now runs to 4%, and ahost of nuisance taxes (including thenotorious "hot dog" tax on meals costingless than one dollar) have gone on thebooks.

During the past fifteen years, reportsBleiberg of Barron's, New York's tax loadhas been multiplied nearly five times, from$94 per capita to $460, under the man whonow proclaims his desire to bring fiscal

sanity to Washington. Accord-

ing to the Citizens Public ExpenditureSurvey, a privately financed legislativewatchdog in Albany, "state and local taxesare 12% higher than the next highest stateand 50% above the U.S. average." As forNew York State's debt, it has explodedfrom less than one billion to nearly ten

billion dollars including several billionof so-called moral obligations, issuedwithout voter approval.*

Barron's tabs Rockyland as "the nation'scostliest and least efficient welfare state." Itnotes that under the Rockefeller regime theWelfare rolls have soared from 513,681 permonth to 1.8 million. At last cOunt, one outof every ten New Yorkers was on the dole.

A statewide audit of nine thousand casesselected by the New York State Departmentof Social Services found that 11.3 percentof those receiving Aid to Families withDependent Children (A.F.D.C.) wereineligible, while 23.2 percent wereoverpaid. The fraud rate: 34.5 percent. Andkeep in mind that the Welfarecrats,themselves, picked the contestants to be

surveyed in this game.As for outlays to the state's vasteducation bureaucracy, termed a majorrathole by Barron's, New York has underRockefeller been spending $1,584 per pupilin elementary and secondary schools -seventeen percent higher than the second-biggest spender (New Jersey), a staggeringfifty-three percent above the national

average, and enough to pay tuition for everylittle tyke in New York at the prestigiousConcord Academy where JacquelineOnassis sends Caroline Kennedy. RobertBleiberg concludes:

*Having buried New York in debt, and raised taxes ashigh as is feasible, Rockefeller wants Washington tobail out his sinking ship of state. He has for some timebeen the nation's most powerful advocate of federalRevenue Sharing. Victims of bad state government cannow escape astronomical taxes by crossing state lines.Rockefeller would end this by having the federalgovernment do the bulk of the taxing and then send aportion of it back to state and local government so thattaxpayers cannot escape short of leaving the country.

6


7/18

Tax and tax; spend and spend; elect and elect For 15 years, the old NewDeal formula has worked famously for the retiring Governor, less well for hisstate....

Americans may face Critical Choices- but Governor Rockefeller scarcely

ranks among them

Despite his record of profligacy, we canexpect that over the next three years theEstablishment's mass media will regale uswith tales of Nelson Rockefeller'smagnificent qualifications for the Presi-dency based upon the efficient and en-lightened job he did as governor of New

York.The Family That Preys Together

But, to consider him by himself isgrossly to underestimate the power ofNelson Rockefeller. He is but the mostvisible of four brothers who operate as ateam. A fifth brother, Winthrop, died of

cancer last year after two terms as gover-nor of Arkansas. For whatever reasons, heseems to have been the least disciplined ofthe Rockefeller clan and the team appearsnot to have been diminished by his demise.

The Rockefeller Brothers specialize inthe fields of oil, high finance, politics,foreign and domestic policy, ecology,education, and religion. They have tre-mendous leverage in the mass media. Theirpower, prestige, and influence is felt in

almost every important aspect of our lives particularly those involved with themolding of public opinion. And allof these

factors can be brought to bear in assuringthe success of Nelson's assault on thePresidency.

For three generations the Rockefellershave been driven by a lust for money andpower which outstrips even the imagina-

tions of normal people. John D. Rockefeller(1839-1937), while still a relatively youngman, founded the Standard Oil Company.By mergers and ruthless crushing of

competition, largely through kick-

backs from the railroad industry, hiscorporation dominated the U.S. oil refiningindustry. But the senior Rockefeller was notaltogether satisfied. His goal, "a dream ofconquest" some called it, was to own not

only the largest, but the only, refineries inthe world. Called upon to justify his

methods, he is said to have remarked:"Competition is a sin."The senior Rockefeller was a master

Machiavellian who began by schemingagainst local competitors and wound upscheming with cartelists for economiccontrol of the world. Ferdinand Lund-bergnotes in The Rich And The Super-Rich:"As the history of Standard Oil by anyauthor, pro or con, clearly shows,

(1937) David, Nelson, Winthrop,Laurance, John.

Rockefeller was of a deeply conspiratorial,scheming nature, always planning yearsahead with a clarity of vision that went farbeyond anything any of his associates had

to offer."The "deeply conspiratorial" methods

which worked so well in building his oil

empire also proved effective in consoli-dating political power. The foundingRockefeller's son-in-law, Senator NelsonAldrich of Rhode Island (Nelson AldrichRockefeller's maternal grandfather), in-troduced the graduated income tax on thefloor of the U.S. Senate in a ploy which puta tax on the accumulation of capital bypotential Rockefeller competitors a tax

which the Rockefellers, themselves, largelyescaped. For, at about the same time JudgeKenesaw Landis was ordering the breakup

of Standard Oil, the wily old John D. waskilling several flying feathered objects witha single stone. He

7


8/18

avoided taxes by creating four great tax-exempt foundations, and used them asrepository for his "divested" interests in thevarious Standard Oil entities. It had the neteffect of taking his wallet out of his leftpocket and putting it into his right, since hecontrolled the foundations to exactly the

same extent he continued to control hisStandard Oil properties. And, in the switch,Rockefeller had made his assets non-taxableso that they might be passed down throughthe generations without being ravaged bythe estate and gift levies which everyoneelse had to pay. As Lundberg observed, oldJohn D. Rockefeller planned ahead.

The Rockefeller family maintains a

battery of interlocking foundations andtrusts, allowing the secretive descendants ofthe "deeply conspiratorial" John D.Rockefeller to guard the family's vast assetsfrom prying eyes of the tax collector andother interested parties. "Any real clues asto the wealth of the brothers," says Fortune,"have been vigilantly guarded since theirbirth. None of the terms of the trusts

established for them by their father has everbeen revealed, and even the names of thetrustees are known only to the family and afew key advisors . .. ."

Through their multiple foundations theRockefeller family invested its moneywhere it would have the most influence anddo the family the most good. And by far thechief beneficiaries of its "charities" havebeen the Rockefellers.

One would assume that, since theRockefellers are thought of as capitalists,they would have used their fortune to fosterthe philosophy of individual liberty. But, just the opposite is true. We have beenunable to find a single project in the historyof the Rockefeller foundations whichpromotes free enterprise. Indeed, except inthe fields of health and science (and some of

these grants are highly questionable) almostall of the Rockefeller grants have been useddirectly or indirectly to promoteeconomic and

social collectivism. It would take a book tochronicle in detail how the Rockefellershave used their tax-free cash to promotesuch collectivism in almost every segmentof American life. (As chance would have it,your correspondent has just begun such abook.)

The Great MonopolyReasonable men ask what could moti-

vate the Rockefellers to finance collecti-vistefforts which seem so totally at odds withtheir own interests. They forget that John D.Rockefeller was a Machiavellian whoboasted that he hated competition.Whenever he could, Rockefeller used the

government to promote his own interestsand hinder his competitors. Monopolycapitalism is impossible unless you have agovernment with the power to stranglewould-be competitors. The Rockefellerswant a centralized all-powerful governmentbecause they can more easily control it at itsapex. In the past they have managed thisthrough front men, but if Nelson

Rockefeller is elected President they willhave direct control over the immenselypowerful machinery of the ExecutiveBranch of our government machinerywhich their lieutenants and allies have forso long labored to create.

One of the first fields into which theRockefeller foundations moved was edu-cation. You should be able to guess why.John D. Rockefeller put his assistant FredGates in charge of his tax-free GeneralEducation Board. Gates tipped theRockefeller philosophy on education in theBoard's Occasional Paper No. 1, whichdeclared:

In our dreams we have limitlessresources and the people yieldthemselves with perfect docility to ourmoulding hands. The presenteducational conventions fade from ourminds, and unhampered by tradition, wework our own good will upon a gratefuland responsive rural folk.

8


9/18

Later, this General Education Boardexpanded its scope to take into its"moulding hands" the city folk as well. Tothis end the Rockefeller and Carnegiefoundations, which have often had inter-locking directorates, began in the earlyThirties to supply large amounts of money

to propagate the philosphy of John Deweyand his Marxist educationists. As ReneWormser, who served as counsel to theHouse Special Committee To InvestigateTax Exempt Foundations, has observed:

Research and experimental stationswere established at selected universities,

notably Columbia, Stanford, and

Chicago. Here some of the worst mischief in recent education was born. In these Rockefeller-and-Carnegie-established vineyards worked many of

the principal characters in the story of the suborning of American education.Here foundations nurtured some of the most ardent academic advocates ofupsetting the American system and sup-

planting it with a Socialist state...Whatever its earlier origins ormanifestations, there is little doubt thatthe radical movement in education was accelerated by an organized Socialistmovement in the United States.

At the same time the National EducationAssociation, the country's chief lobby forsocialized education, was also financedmainly by the Rockefeller and Carnegiefoundations. It too threw its considerableweight behind the Dewey philosophies. Asan N.E.A. report declared in 1934: "Adying laissez faire must be completelydestroyed and all of us, including the'owners,' must be subjected to a largedegree of social control." Teachers laboringto resist the Dewey fanatics were quickly

shouted down by propagandists financed bythe Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations.

The Rockefellers not only used theirmoney to seize the high ground in Amer-ica's centers of teacher training, they alsospent millions of dollars to create textbooksto undermine student beliefs in patriotismand free enterprise. In his book,

Foundations: Their Power AndInfluence,

Rene' Wormser notes Rockefeller grants,for instance, to produce a series of publicschool textbooks called Building America.These were so obviously Communistpropaganda that the California Legislaturerefused to appropriate money for them andissued a Report saying that they were notonly designed to downgrade America, but"contain purposely distorted references

favoring Communism." It was no"mistake," but a conscious effort of theRockefellers to sell Communism. AsCongressman Eugene E. Cox observed, theRockefeller foundations were long agodedicated to financing "individuals andorganizations whose business it has been toget Communism into the private and publicschools."

Meanwhile, the Rockefellers pouredmillions of dollars into the infamousLondon School of Economics, founded asan indoctrination center by Sidney Webb,father of the Fabian Socialist Society. Theyalso financed its American counterpart, theNew School for Social Research. Theinterior walls of this Rockefeller enterprisewere decorated by Communist muralistOcozco with portraits of Lenin, Stalin, andmarching Soviet soldiers. And theRockefellers went as far as to bankroll theYenching University in Peiping and fill itwith Red professors who recruited andtrained (among others) a Communist namedChou En-lai.

Other fields in which the Rockefellershave invested their tax-free dollars includereligion, where they have financed the

Union Theological Seminary of New York,which has done so much to turn the clergyLeftward. And they have also beeninstrumental in supporting the NationalCouncil of Churches, which has for yearsparroted the Moscow Line while

9


10/18

claiming to represent millions of Protes-tants.

The family has also been deeply in-volved in racial agitation. Nelson is amongthe many Rockefellers who are life mem-bers of the collectivist N.A.A.CP. TheRockefellers were key angels behind the

late Martin Luther King. Nelson believes itis difficult to be too militant. Before me as Iwrite is an Associated Press reportdatedAugust 24, 1967. It is headlined: "RockySees Progress In Rioting." The story saysthat the governor disagreed with a warningfrom intelligence officers in the wake of theHarlem and Watts riots that "the UnitedStates is in danger" of racial strife.

Rockefeller claimed: "I'm very optimistic.The racial situation is a sign of progress."So-called "Metro Government" is an-

other coUectivist project in which theRockefellers have invested scores of mil-lions. In a nutshell, Metro is the governingof an area or region by a central body of"experts" - planners who are usuallyappointed and vested with great powers,and who are not directly accountable to thepeople. Metro policies and programs, goalsand methods, appear in a variety of forms.But the basic strategy involves merging andconsolidation of city or town governmentsinto ever larger collectives. Cities aremerged with other cities and/or with acounty; the counties are merged with othercounties; eventually even state lines are tobe erased. The distinguished columnist Jo

Hindman, who has for fifteen years beenthe leading Conservative expert on thisbusiness, sums it up this way:

Metro proposes to collect inde- pendent units of municipal governmentunder a big super-government and tomaintain control of such bodies throughsomething described as "appointed

executive" administration. Since these proposed metropolitan districts frequently cross state lines, the veryconcept

of government units corresponding tothem makes hash of our Constitutionwhich vests all reserved governingpowers in the several states. *

It is not by accident that the RockefellerFoundation has provided hundreds of

millions to promote such collectivistefforts. It has been run until recently byJohn D. Rockefeller III, an openly avowedrevolutionary. He has even written a bookabout it entitled The Second AmericanRevolution, reviewed in Business Week ofApril 7, 1973, under the title, "Guess Who'sComing To The Revolution." BusinessWeek affects amazement, declaring: "This

is strong stuff from a pillar of theEstablishment ...." But the editors ofBusiness Weekknow very well that it is theelitists of that Establishment who arecreating the collectivist state in America tostrengthen their own control. As ProfessorAntony Sutton of the prestigious HooverInstitute has said of Rockefeller's TheSecond American Revolution: "This bookreflects the collectivism of the Establish-ment and calls for a series of collectivistmeasures .... This is in full measure anorganic theory of the state as reflected inHitlerism and Stalinism."

While John D. Rockefeller HI has beenbusy financing the revolution from theRockefeller Foundation, brother Laur-ancelabors in another vineyard. He is not onlyinvolved in the family's many business

interests but is founder of the AmericanConservation Association. One of his mostrecent projects has been to organize andfinance ecology freaks and bug chasers intoa political pressure group

*A major step towards metro government was takenby Richard Nixon on February 12, 1973, withExecutive Order 11647. Without so much asconsulting the Congress, President Nixon had by

Executive Order divided the United States into tenfederal regions to be tun by "Federal RegionalCouncils." The Federal Regional Councils representa major step toward the era of Big Brother predictedby George Orwell in his bookNineteen Eighty-Four.

10


11/18

powerful enough to help create the energycrisis that has proved so profitable toRockefeller interests. Laurance also headsthe Citizens Advisory Committee On En-vironmental Quality, which has a task forcedealing with land use and urbandevelopment. The findings of that Rocke-feller task force are summarized as follows

by Wolf von Eckardt of the WashingtonPost: "We need . .. more comprehensiveplanning and more effective controls tomake the plans stick. The foremost need,however, is a change in our national attitudetoward private property rights. That is amatter of legal doctrine which calls for newinterpretations by the courts in light of oururgent social and environmental needs."

In other words, concern about theenvironment is to be used as an excuse forsocialism. And the Rockefeller task forcereport provides this rationalization forputting Big Brother (particularly if Nelsongets to be Big Brother) in charge of yourproperty:

Americans have thought of ur-

banization rights as coming from theland itself, "up from the bottom" likeminerals or crops. It is equally possibleto view them as coming "down from thetop," as being created by society andallocated by it to each land parcel.

Guess what "down from the top" means.And this from the lovable hypocrites who

are always telling us how much theybelieve in democracy. What the Rocke-fellers are planning for us is a dictatorshipof the aristocracy disguised as a socialistWelfare State.

Still, important as all of these brothersare, we have not yet met the tribal chief.Surprisingly, the captain of the Rockefellerteam is the youngest; he is also the smartest

and most ambitious of the brothers. DavidRockefeller heads the Chase ManhattanBank, the nation's most politically powerfulfinancial institution.

And it would be the height of naivete tobelieve that Chase Manhattan will notemploy all of the vast leverage at itsdisposal in behalf of Nelson's assault on thePresidency. Congressman John Rous-selotcounts among his close friends professionalcampaign managers who in the past havemanaged Nelson Rockefeller's Presidentialprimary campaigns. CongressmanRousselot reports: "They inform me that thekey decisions in those campaigns weremade by David, not Nelson." It is David,not Nelson, who guides even the politicalfortunes of the family.

Today David Rockefeller is a moneymagnate, wielding unprecedented power,expanding or inhibiting the economies of

whole nations by his day-to-day decisions.The power David wields, one of hisbiographers says, "crosses all borders, canmake or destroy governments, start and stopwars, profoundly influence everyone's life including yours." Time magazine oncedescribed him as "one of that little group ofmen who sit at the financial hub of theworld's wealthiest nation and by their nods

give the stop or go sign to enterprises fromBonn to Bangkok." One prominentDelaware banker compared the relativepowers of the top Rockefeller and thePresident in these words: "Let me put it thisway. I don't think Richard Nixon tellsDavid what to do. If anything, it's the otherway around."

By 1973, the Chase had accumulated

over $39 billion in assets. A House BankingSubcommittee reveals that ChaseManhattan, through its combined trustdepartments, holds enough stock in fifty-five major corporations in the United Statesto exercise some measure of control. Theboard of directors of the Rockefellers'Chase Manhattan consists of the richest andmost powerful men in America.

Collectively they own or control well overone hundred billion dollars. The Pat-manSubcommittee Report reveals that ChaseManhattan has minority stock con-

11


12/18

trol in Columbia Broadcasting System and"interlocking directorates" with the NewYork Times and the American BroadcastingCompany.

You can expect Nelson Rockefeller'scandidacy to receive a good press in thosequarters. You can also expect that many

businessmen and corporations in debtdirectly or indirectly to Chase ManhattanBank will open their wallets to supportNelson's candidacy. The fund raisingdoubtless won't be as heavy-handed as wasthat of the CREEPs for Nixon, but one mayreasonably assume that it will be even morespectacularly successful.

International PolicyWhile the Rockefellers have arduously

worked on the domestic scene to promotetheir own elitist control of a socialistWelfare State, their primary interests havebeen in the field of foreign affairs. Whenone looks at the international holdings ofthis family, it is not hard to understand theirpersonal interest.

In addition to its S39 billion in admitted

assets, the Rockefellers' Chase Manhattan,according to the New York Times, has "amajor portion of their business carried onthrough affiliated banks overseas .. . notconsolidated on the balance sheet." AndTime magazine reports: "The Chase has 28foreign branches of its own, but moreimportant, it has a globe-encircling string of50,000 correspondent banking offices."

Fifty thousand correspondent banksaround the world! Absolutely unbelievable.But true.

This gives the Rockefellers the ability tocreate an international monetary crisisovernight. Suspicious souls argue that theyhave been making use of their every ability,yo-yoing the price of gold, dollars, andforeign currencies. Lending credence to

these suspicions is the fact thatUndersecretary of the Treasury Paul A.Volcker, the man chiefly responsible forour disastrous monetary policies

during both the Johnson andNixonAdministrations, is a former vice presidentof the Rockefellers' Chase Manhattan Bank.Under Volcker's "brilliant and enlightened"leadership the dollar has gone from theworld's mainstay currency to a twicedevalued piece of paper no longer backed

by gold. Both Volcker and his "former"boss, David Rockefeller, are outspokenopponents of gold. Both know better.

Every time an international monetarystorm blows up, hundreds of millions of

David and the Rockefeller-trained Chou En-Lai.

dollars flow into European banks and thevalue of the dollar in relation to the other

currencies of the world changes. Whenthe storm subsides, insiders have madeenormous amounts of money. Who trig-gers these monetary crises which haveoccurred regularly since 1967? It wasn'tyour Uncle Max from Hackensack. Thatthe Rockefellers were deeply involved,through the Chase Manhattan Bank andits overseas facilities, seems more thanreasonable.

While international banking is proba-bly the Rockefellers' most importantbusiness, the family is better known tothe public for its oil properties. Petro-leum is now the most important singlecommodity in world trade. Besides its useas a fuel for motor vehicles, it is the mostimportant source of energy and the mostimportant raw material for the manufac-

ture of chemicals. As George Schuyler hassaid, "Where oil is, there is the father-land." The cornerstone of the Rockefellerfortune has always been, and continues tobe, Standard Oil.

12


13/18

The Rockefellers control three of theseven largest oil companies in the world,including the largest (Standard of NewJersey), now called Exxon. The New YorkTimes of September 13, 1951, reported thatStandard Oil of New Jersey then controlled321 companies, including Humble Oil andCreole Petroleum, themselves among thelargest corporations in the world. And, ofcourse, the Rockefellers control, directlyand indirectly, Standard of California,Standard of Indiana, and Socony-Mobil(which was formerly Standard of NewYork). Standard of New Jersey (Exxon) alsooperates major joint ventures with RoyalDutch Shell which is jointly controlled byconspiratorial British and Dutch interests

including those of the Bilderberg chieftain,Prince Bernhard of The Netherlands.

Standard has enormous holdings in theMiddle East, but shares the territory withothers. South America, however, has cometo be considered somewhat of a Rockefellerpreserve. Exxon is in Venezuela, Argentina,Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador,Paraguay, Uruguay, Nicaragua, El

Salvador, and Peru. Mobil is in Argentina,Barbados, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,Ecuador, Guatemala, Puerto Rico, andVenezuela. Standard Oil of California is inthe Canal Zone, Brazil, Colombia, Peru,Guatemala, Puerto Rico, and Venezuela.Standard Oil of Indiana is in Colombia,Trinidad, Puerto Rico, and Venezuela.

All of this makes sense. The Rockefel-

lers began by trying to create a nationalmonopoly in oil. From there they extendedtheir influence into our nationalgovernment, where they pulled strings tobenefit Standard Oil and their bankinginterests. Now that their interests areworldwide, they are seeking the samecontrol over world politics that they haveexercised at the national level. This is one

explanation of why, since World War I, theRockefellers have led in the promotion of aWorld Government which they call the"New World Order."

World GovernmentJohn D. Rockefeller was so eager to trap

the United States into the League of Nationsthat he donated money for the Leaguebuilding in Geneva. His countrymenescaped the noose the first time around, anddid not join, but grandson Nelson was a

delegate to the founding of the UnitedNations in San Francisco in 1945. Later,Nelson and his brothers donated the land forthe United Nations complex along the EastRiver in New York.

The Rockefellers hope to convert theUnited Nations into a full-blown WorldGovernment dominated by the brothers andtheir allies among the Insiders of theinternational Establishment. CertainlyNelson Rockefeller has made no attempt todisguise his own desires for worldfederalism, which he has regularly en-dorsed. The Christian Science Monitor forFebruary 12, 1962, quotes Rockefeller asmaintaining that the answer to the world'sproblems "can be found in the federal idea"of an international superstate. As a firststep in this direction the former New York

governor advocates "movement towardssome form of common taxation" with othernations. All of which is rather ironic, sinceNelson Rockefeller and his brothers are soprotectedby tax shelters as to pay practical-ly no federal income tax.*

Originally, most of the Rockefeller talkrevolved around "regional alliances" ofFree World nations which would evolve

into a World Government. Now theRockefellers boldly advocate amalgamationwith the Communist world. As theAssociated Press reported July 26, 1968:"New York Gov. Nelson A. Rockefellersays as president he would work towardinternational creation of 'a new world order'based on East-West coopera-

*Jn July of1967, Senator Robert Kennedy revealedthat for the year of 1966, Nelson Rockefeller paid thegrand total of $685 in personal income taxes.

13


14/18

tion instead of conflict. The Republicanpresidential contender said he would begina dialogue with Red China, if elected, to'improve the possibilities of accom-modations' with that country as well as theSoviet Union."

It can hardly be surprising that Rocke-feller's chief foreign policy advisor at thetime, one Henry A. Kissinger, has sincearranged to move President Nixon toward just such accommodation with the Com-munist world.

The Rockefellers have been working onthis project for many years through theextremely powerful Council on ForeignRelations (C.F.R.). The elitist C.F.R. wasestablished in the aftermath of World War I,

when it became clear that America was notgoing to join the League of Nations, anearly effort to create a formal WorldGovernment. Among the funding fathers ofthe C.F.R. were such potentates ofinternational banking as J.P. Morgan, JohnD. Rockefeller, Bernard Baruch, PaulWarburg, Otto Kahn, and Jacob Schiff. Itwas the same clique which had engineered

the establishment of the Federal ReserveSystem; which had driven through theMarxist graduated income tax and arrangedfor its own tax-free foundations; whichmaneuvered the totally mad involvement ofAmerica in World War I; and, whichpromoted the effort to trap our country inthe League of Nations.

Originally the C.F.R. was controlled by

a consortium of Morgan partners andagents, but over the years Morgan influencehas receded and the Rockefeller family hasgained mastery of the organization.Chairman of the board of the Council onForeign Relations is David Rockefeller. Hispredecessor was John J. McCloy, aRockefeller agent par excellence. The sameyear McCloy became chairman of the board

of the C.F.R., he also became chairman ofthe board of the Chase Manhattan Bank.Until quite recently, the Council on

Foreign Relations avoided publicity with

near complete success. But a series ofwidely distributed exposes of its activitiesby Conservatives Dan Smoot, CleonSkousen, Phoebe Courtney, and this authorhave forced it to assume new tactics. Thegame is now to admit that what we havesaid about the C.F.R. in the past wasessentially true, but to create the impression

that the Council is now racked withdissension and has lost its grip on theAmerican government.

This is the view projected in an exten-sive article by Times staffer Anthony Lukasin the very Establishment New York Times

Magazine of November 21, 1971. Lukaswrites:

From 1945 well into the sixties,Council members were in the forefront

of America's globalist activism: theUnited Nations organizational meetingin San Francisco (John J. McCloy,

Hamilton Fish Armstrong, Joseph Johnson, Thomas Finletter and many others); as ambassadors to the world body (Edward Stettinius, Henry Cabot

Lodge, James Wadsworth and all but three others); the U.S. occupation inGermany (Lucius Gay as military

governor, McCloy again and JamesConant as High Commissioners);

NATO (Finletter again, HarlanCleveland, Charles Spofford as U.S.

delegates).For the last three decades, American

foreign policy has remained largely in the hands of men - the overwhelming majority of them Council members -whose world perspective was formed inWorld War II and in the economic

reconstruction and military securityprograms that followed... TheCouncil was their way of staying in

touch with the levels of power...

Such admissions from the Times seemednothing short of revolutionary. For, despitethe fact that members of the

14


15/18

C.F.R. have a virtual lock on the majorcommunications media in our country,almost nothing had appeared about thegroup until Conservatives turned on thelight. Commenting on the secrecy, Lukasadmits:

One of the most remarkable aspectsof this remarkable organization, whose1,500 members include most figures whohave significantly influenced American foreign policy in the last 30 years, ishow little is known about it outside anarrow circle of East Coast insiders. So far as I could determine, no graduatestudent has written a Ph.D. thesis on it. Most newspaper references are briefnotations that some notable has spokenthere (omitting what he said, for allCouncil proceedings are off the record).

When an organization contains as manypowerful individuals as does the C.F.R.,holds its meetings "off the record," andreceives almost no publicity, one mightreasonably conclude that it has made

secrecy its business.Another fascinating fact about the

Council is that while some of its keymembers were brought into the organi-zation because of their expertise, power, orposition, many have achieved fame, wealth,or power because of their membership.Lukas reminds us:

... everyone knows how fraternitybrothers can help other brothers climbthe ladder of life. If you want to make foreign policy, there's no betterfraternity to belong to than the Council.

When Henry Stimson - the group'squintessential member went toWashington in 1940 as Secretary ofWar, he took with him John McCloy,

who was to become Assistant Secretaryin charge of personnel. McCloy hasrecalled:

"Whenever we needed a man wethumbed through the roll of Councilmembers and put through a call to NewYork."

And over the years the men McCloycalled in turn called other Councilmembers....

The avowed goal of the Council onForeign Relations is a "New World Order"... World Government. This explains whythe Establishment, headed by theRockefellers, is now pursuing "detente"with the Communists. The Rockefellers, ofcourse, have been deeply involved with theReds since the early days of the Bolshevik

Revolution. We know, for example, thatthey built oil refineries for the Soviets; thatthey bought half of the enormous Caucasianoil fields after they had been declarednationalized; and, that the Chase ManhattanBank sold Bolshevik bonds in Americaeven before F.D.R. granted the Sovietsformal recognition.

TheNew York Herald Tribune of August12, 1964, tells us that David Rockefellerhad just visited the Kremlin, the citadel ofhis supposed archenemies evilBolsheviks who are supposed to be workingto take his wealth away from him and giveit to the "little people." The Tribunereported: "The world's foremostCommunist, Soviet Premier NikitaKhrushchev, and one of its leading capi-talists, David Rockefeller, met for two

hours and fifteen minutes yesterday. Na-turally, they talked about money." We don'tknow what was said, but we do know thatvery soon thereafter Khrushchev was fired.We don't know who has the power to firethe man who is supposed to be absolutedictator of the Soviet Union and itsCommunist Party, but it gives rise to someinteresting speculation.

Certainly we know that the Rockefellers,through their International BasicEconomies Corporation, in which they arein partnership with Lenin Peace Prize-

15


16/18

winner Cyrus Eaton and the EnglishRothschilds, have been building war pro-duction facilities behind the Iron Curtain.(See the New York Times for January 16,1967.) We know that the Rockefellers havean exclusive contract with the SovietGovernment whereby I.B.E.C. acts as theCommunists' agent for procuring patents inthe United States.

And we know that David Rockefelleragain met with the Communists in Moscowbetween July 7 and 11, 1971, to discuss theexpansion of East-West trade. We knowthat following that conference the SovietGovernment released this statement throughtheMoscow News:

... on the matter of East-Westcommerce or trade, we have agreed thatwe should both attempt to eliminate theconstraints that both governments haveplaced which prevent ease of trade. Wehave also agreed that this trend hasalready started, that the United Stateshas taken some steps to alleviate thiscondition. And we will encourage

commerce organizations of bothcountries to meet together to study the practical problems of negotiating tradeagreements.

The Rockefellers had not only beenleaders in transferring invaluable Americantechnology to the Soviets, but they activelypromoted the expansion of aid and trade

with the Soviet Union even as the bloodbathin Vietnam dragged on and on. And whatwas the result? The London Sunday Timesfor January 16, 1972, featured a story by itsWashington correspondent, Harlow Unger,which begins:

In one of the most far-reaching tradeagreements since the end of the Second

World War, America and Russiatomorrow will announce plans to expandtrade and work towards normalisation oftrade between the two nations. Theagree-

ment could lead to a free flow of goodsbetween the US and all the Iron Curtaincountries by 1973.

We know that Business Weekfor May26, 1973, reported:

Chase Manhattan Bank, head-quartered in New York at 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza, this week added asymbolic and prestigious address to itslist of offices: 1 Karl Marx Square. TheChase's globetrotting chairman, David Rockefeller, flew to Moscow for theopening ceremonies and stopped in for ameeting at the Kremlin Palace withSoviet Premier Alexei Kosygin....

The Chase, which helped financerecent Soviet purchases of foundryequipment for the Kama River truck plant and last year's huge grain purchases from the U.S., is hopeful ofgenerating additional business from itsnewest office....

One would expect the Rockefellers toopen up shop at the most prestigious (and asBusiness Weeksays "symbolic") address intown. You'll have to admit it beats 1984Trotsky Terrace. Or asNewsweekmagazineheadlined its report: The Kremlin now has a"Comrade at Chase."Newsweekcontinued:

Spurred by Russia's need for Westerntechnology, U.S.-Soviet trade has tripled

since 1971 and could approach $1billion for this year alone. So far, thebiggest single trade deal on which workhas begun is the $172 million Kama River truck-manufacturing project, forwhich Chase and the US. Export-ImportBank shared the financing....

So this year while the U.S. taxpayers

cough up an astonishing eighty billiondollars ostensibly to defend themselvesfrom the military-industrial complex of

16


17/18

the Soviet Union, the Rockefellers will beloaning the Soviets millions of dollars toimprove their military-industrial complex sowe will have to spend even more money in1975. This is one of Nelson Rockefeller'smajor qualifications for not being President,but it was nota point raised by C.B.S. in its

recent two-hour propaganda documentaryon the Rockefellers.*

We also know that David and NelsonRockefeller have long called for the"normalizing of relations" and establishing"trade" with Mao Tse-tung and the RedChinese. And we know that Richard Nixonand Henry Kissinger have reversed theRepublican platform and a hundred Nixon

promises to follow that line also, byopening the door for trade with the butchersof Red China.

While Mr. Nixon's sudden cozying up tothe Peking mob has attracted reams ofcomment and publicity, there is one aspectof all this which has attracted virtually noattention. I refer to the fact that large oildeposits have been found near the Senkaka

Islands in the East China Sea, a territoryclaimed by both Nationalist and Red China,as well as by Japan. TheNew York Times ofApril 10, 1971, reported that the StateDepartment had advised several Americanoil concerns to cease exploring the area.Reports within the oil industry indicate thatStandard Oil was permitted to move in afterthe others left. Standard is as much

Rockefeller property as Henry Kissinger,Mr. Nixon's top China advisor.In dealing with Red China, so far, we

have made numerous concessions and haveasked none in return. Perhaps one of

*Nelson Rockefeller has never been exactly what youwould call an anti-Communist. Harris Smith, on Page367 of his book, O.S.S.: The Secret history Of America'sFirst Central Intelligence Agency (University ofCalifornia Press, Berkeley, 1972), reveals that Walter

Bedell Smith, former chief of staff to General Eisen-hower, Ambassador to Moscow, and Director of theC.I.A., "once warned Eisenhower that Rockefeller was aCommunist."

the concessions "we" will receive will bedrilling rights for Standard Oil. After all,David Rockefeller has been promoting anopening of Red China trade for the past fiveyears. The plot thickens, as they say, and inthis case oil is thicker than blood.

After all, we know from U.S. News &

World Report of August 13, 1973, thatChase Manhattan Bank has entered into anagreement with the Bank of China "tohandle the financing and mechanics ofexports and imports with the United States,"as David Rockefeller explained it uponreturning from Peking. Business WeekofJuly 14, 1973, quotes Frederick Heldring,vice chairman of Philadelphia National

Bank, as stating: "Communists are oftenvery conservative [sic]. They like to dealwith the largest capitalist institutions. If youadd Rockefeller in, you've got theequation."

Last year, for example, Moscow quietlyrequested that the Nixon Administrationsend David Rockefeller as U.S.Ambassador to Moscow. The second choice

was Dr. Avmand Hammer, anothermillionaireInsider, whose father bankrolledthe founding of the Communist Party,U.S.A. Both regretted that they had highercallings which required their presenceelsewhere.

Running The ShowWhen John D. Rockefeller was trying to

monopolize the oil industry, there was oneploy which he used over and over again.That was to place his men inside competingfirms or to bribe the employees of otherfirms. His descendants have played thesame game with our government. It makesno difference whether there is a Democrator Republican Administration, theRockefeller people have held key positions.To the Rockefeller-C.F.R. elite it makes nodifference which party is in power. Nelsonwas himself part of the Roosevelt andTruman Administrations. In the Eisen-hower Administration he helped to createthe Department of Health, Education and

17


18/18

Welfare, which now takes an even largerportion of the federal Budget than doesdefense. Eisenhower's first Secretary ofState, John Foster Dulles (C.F.R.), was aRockefeller cousin. Dulles' successor,Christian Herter (C.F.R.), had displayed thegood sense to marry into the Standard Oil

fortune.On the recommendation of NelsonRockefeller, John Kennedy named DeanRusk of the C.F.R. to be his Secretary ofState. Rusk took a leave of absence as headof the Rockefeller Foundation to accept thepost. Kennedy appointed Chester Bowles asUnder Secretary of State. Bowles (also ofthe C.F.R.) has been a trustee of theRockefeller Brothers Fund and a director

of the Rockefeller Foundation. DemocratKennedy then named Standard Oilexecutive Alexander Trowbridge (C.F.R.)as Assistant Secretary of Commerce, andPresident Johnson later promoted him toSecretary of Commerce. President Kennedyalso named Roswell Gilpatric (C.F.R.), atrustee of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, asDeputy Secretary of Defense.

Richard Nixon appointed NelsonRockefeller's attorney John Mitchell asAttorney General, and Mitchell ran thePresident's campaign for re-election andbecame his chief advisor on domesticpolicy. The President's chief advisor onforeign policy is now Secretary of StateHenry Kissinger, who came to the NixonAdministration from a staff position at the

C.F.R., and had for ten years been onNelson Rockefeller's payroll as a personalforeign policy advisor. It was Rockefellerwho arranged for him to be appointed avirtual Assistant President for ForeignAffairs. Even Spiro Agnew had in early1968 been national chairman of theRockefeller For President Committee.

We sincerely hope our readers arebeginning to see a pattern emerging.

Years ago, Nelson Rockefeller de-manded, and received, the privilege ofnaming his own men to top administrativeposts on all important Republicancommittees - including the vital National,

Senatorial, Congressional, and Policycommittees. His demand for top patronagewas reluctantly agreed to after he threatenedto cut off all Rockefeller and Rockefeller-controlled financial contributions. Theeffect on the Republican Party has been alltoo clear.

Herbert Brownell (C.F.R.) was aRockefeller employee whom Eisenhowerappointed Attorney General, whereuponBrownell selected hundreds of federal judges, district attorneys, and U.S.Marshals, and arranged to appointRockefeller men to the White House staff including Max Rabb, Tom Stephen,Arthur Vandenberg Jr., and Bob Hampton.The latter was chief dispenser of WhiteHouse patronage. It has been reliablyestimated that over the years the

Rockefellers have placed at least fivethousand persons in important positions inthe federal government. The Rockefellerinfluence and authority now runs from thevery top throughout the Civil Servicebureaucracy.

And now it is time for the coup degrace. As the Rockefeller Brothers prepareto merge us into a World Government, they

are not content to have lieutenants andallies and agents at the controls. It is nowtime to bring on Brother Nelson. He can bestopped, of course, if enough Americanscan be made to realize what is happening.Either way, we shall soon know a great dealmore about the future of individual libertyin a sovereign United States of America.

allen rockefeller campaigning for the new world order

Documents