alice performance

43
27 August 2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 1 ALICE Performance Physics motivation Experimental conditions Physics performance

Upload: rowdy

Post on 11-Feb-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ALICE Performance. Physics motivation Experimental conditions Physics performance. LHC Energy. For A-A collisions: E cms = 5500 A GeV E lab = E cms 2 / (2 A m N ) = 1.6  10 7 A GeV - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ALICE Performance

27 August 2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 1

ALICE Performance

Physics motivation

Experimental conditions

Physics performance

Page 2: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 2

LHC EnergyFor A-A collisions: Ecms = 5500 A GeV Elab = Ecms

2 / (2A mN) = 1.6 107 A GeVfor lead ions Elab Pb-Pb = 3.3 109 GeV = 3.3 1012 MeV = 0.5 kg 10 cm g

And for pp collisions: Elab pp(14TeV) = 70 g 2 cm g

For those who don’t like to be seated on a lead ion (and to fly inside LHC vacuum pipe) Ecms Pb-Pb = 5500 A GeV = 1.14 109 MeV = 1 g 2 cm g

Still, macroscopic energy !!! (one can actually hear it)

But the size of ions is by factor more than 10-12 smaller

Page 3: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 3

hep-ph0104010√s (GeV)10 102 103

1.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

Nch

/(0.5

Npa

rt)

5

102 103 104

dNch

/d|

<1

2

5103

Still no safe way to extrapolate shadowing/saturation (might decrease charged multiplicity) jet quenching (might increase it dramatically) A-scaling (importance soft vs. hard changes with energy)

ALICE optimized for dNch/dy = 4000 Checked up to 8000 (reality factor 2)

dNch/d ~ 1500

What multiplicity do we expect? old estimates: dNch/dy = 2000 – 8000, now we can extrapolate from RHIC data

dNch/d ~ 2500

(from K.Kajantie, K.Eskola)

Page 4: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 4

Use different Ion species to vary the energy density

central

minimum bias

and pA

Page 5: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 5

ALICE Physics Program (has to cover in one experiment what at the SPS was covered by 6-7

experiments, and at RHIC by 4!!)

Global observables: multiplicities, distributions

Degrees of freedom as a function of T: hadron ratios and spectra dilepton continuum, direct photons

Geometry of the emitting source:

HBT, impact parameter via zero-degree energy

Early state manifestation of collective effects: elliptic flow

Page 6: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 6

ALICE Physics Program

• Deconfinement: • charmonium and bottomium spectroscopy

• Energy loss of partons in quark gluon plasma:• jet quenching high pt spectra• open charm and open beauty

• Chiral symmetry restoration: • neutral to charged ratios• resonance decays

• Fluctuation phenomena - critical behavior: • event-by-event particle composition and spectra

• pp collisions in a new energy domain

Page 7: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 7

ALICE detector acceptance

20

0

-1

1

-2

2

0 1 2 3

pt

PHOSHMPID

TRD TOF

TPC

ITS tracking

ITS multiplicity

100

Muon arm 2.4<<4 PMD 2.3<<3.5 FMD -5.4<<-1.6, 1.6<<3

Central Detectors

Page 8: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 8

ALICE LAYOUT: TRACKING (and event

characterization)Inner Tracking System (ITS):6 Si Layers (pixels, drift, strips)Vertex reconstruction, dE/dx-0.9<<0.9

TRDelectron identification, tracking -0.9<<0.9

TPCTracking, dE/dx-0.9<<0.9

Page 9: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 11

ALICE Pb-Pb central event

Nch(-0.5<<0.5)=8000

… what about this!

Page 10: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 12

Tracking performance

Tracking eff. In TPC vs. pT

TPC and ITS tracking efficiency – better then 90%

Page 11: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 13

Track reconstruction in TPC-ITS Track reconstruction in TPC-ITS ppTT resolution resolution

The track momentum is measured (mainly) by TPC

With ITS: resolution improves by a factor ~10 for high pT tracks

Lever arm larger by 1.5 accounts for a factor ~ 2

Remaining effect due to high resolution of points measured in ITS

More improvement comes including the TRD in the tracking

Page 12: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 14

Tracking-II: Momentum Tracking-II: Momentum resolutionresolution

resolution ~ 9% at 100 GeV/c excellent performance in hard region!

Page 13: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 15

ALICE LAYOUT: PID

TOFPID (K,p,)-0.9<<0.9

HMPID: High Momentum Particle Identification (, K, p)• RICH• Hard Probes

Page 14: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 16

ALICE PID ALICE PID • , K, p identified in large acceptance (2 * 1.8 units ) via a combination of dE/dx in Si and TPC and TOF from ~100 MeV to 2 (p/K) - 3.5 (K/p) GeV/c•Electrons identified from 100 MeV/c to 100 GeV/c (with varying efficiency) combining Si+TPC+TOF with a dedicated TRD •In small acceptance HMPID extends PID to ~5 GeV •Photons measured with high resolution in PHOS, counting in PMD, and in EMC

0 1 2 3 4 5 p (GeV/c)

1 10 100 p (GeV/c)

TRD e / PHOS /

TPC + ITS (dE/dx)

/K

/K

/K

K/p

K/p

K/p

e /

e /

HMPID (RICH)

TOF

Alice uses ~all known techniques!

Aerogel Cherenkov 10 GeV/c

Page 15: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 17

Under study: extension of Under study: extension of PID to even higher PID to even higher

momentamomenta Combine TPC and TRD dE/dx

capabilities (similar number of samples/track) to get statistical ID in the relativistic rise region

8<p<10GeV/c

Page 16: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 18

PID combined over ITS, TPC and TOF PID combined over ITS, TPC and TOF (Kaons)(Kaons)

ITS TPC

TOF

Efficiency of the combined PID is higher and the contamination islower than the ones given by any of the detectors stand-alone

ITS & TPC & TOF

Selection : ITS & TPC & TOF (central PbPb HIJING events)

Page 17: ALICE Performance

I. Belikov27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 19

Example : Particle spectraExample : Particle spectra

PreliminaryNeeds corrections for decays, tracking and PID efficiency

generated

reconstructed

Page 18: ALICE Performance

I. Belikov27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 20

Example: Example: analysis analysis

All candidates from the ESD

S ~ p0 = 124S/B ~ p0/p3 = 1.9

PID with C : CK : Cp = 1 : 0 : 1S ~ p0=127

S/B ~ p0/p3 = 7.1

(290 events from the jet production)Fitted with p0*exp(-0.5*(x-p1)*(x-p1)/p2)

+ p3Mass=p1=1115 MeV =√p1=1.3 MeV

Page 19: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 21

Λ Reconstruction with pt dependent geometrical cuts

Efficiency ~ 50 %Efficiency ~ 50 %13 13 ΛΛ / event / eventS/N ~ 1.2S/N ~ 1.2

10 000 000 Pb+Pb events10 000 000 Pb+Pb events

signal noise

= Acc * Eff= Acc * Eff

00 yield yield

Page 20: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 24

Parton Energy LossEffects:

Reduction of single inclusive high pt particlesParton specific (stronger for gluons than quarks)Flavour specific (stronger for light quarks)Measure identified hadrons (, K, p, , etc.) + partons (charm, beauty) at high pt

Suppression of mini-jetssame-side / away-side correlations

Change of fragmentation function for hard jets (pt >> 10 GeV/c)Transverse and longitudinal fragmentation function of jetsJet broadening reduction of jet energy, dijets, -jet pairs

p+p and p+A measurements crucial

Page 21: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 25

Accessible transverse energyAccessible transverse energy

Page 22: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 26

Q

Heavy Quarks – dead coneHeavy quarks with momenta < 20–30 GeV/c v << c

Gluon radiation is suppressed at angles < mQ/EQ “dead-cone” effect

Due to destructive interferenceContributes to the harder fragmentation of heavy quarks

Yu.L.Dokshitzer and D.E.Kharzeev: dead cone implies lower energy loss

Yu.L.Dokshitzer and D.E.Kharzeev, Phys. Lett. B519 (2001) 199 [arXiv:hep-ph/0106202].

D mesons quenching reducedRatio D/hadrons (or D/0) enhanced and sensitive to medium properties

Page 23: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 27

Detection strategy for D0 K- +

Weak decay with mean proper length c = 124 mImpact Parameter (distance of closest approach of a track to the primary vertex) of the decay products d0 ~ 100 m

STRATEGY: invariant mass analysis of fully-reconstructed topologies originating from (displaced) secondary vertices

Measurement of Impact ParametersMeasurement of MomentaParticle identification to tag the two decay products

Page 24: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 28

Track reconstruction in TPC-ITS d0 measurement

Measurement of impact parameters is crucial for secondary vertex reconstruction

Page 25: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 30

Hadronic charmCombine ALICE tracking + secondary vertex finding capabilities (d0~60m@1GeV/c pT) + large acceptance PID to detect processes as D0K-+

~1 in acceptance / central event ~0.001/central event accepted after rec. and all cuts

S/B+S ~ 37

S/B+S ~ 8for 1<pT<2 GeV/c(~12 if K ID required)

significance vs pTResults for 107 PbPb ev. (~ 1/2 a run)

Page 26: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 31

Sensitivity on RAA for D0 mesons

‘High’ pt (6–15 GeV/c)here energy loss can be studied(it’s the only expected effect)

Low pt (< 6–7 GeV/c)Nuclear shadowing+ kt broadening+ ? thermal charm ?

A.Dainese nucl-ex/0311004

Page 27: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 32

D quenching (D0 K-+) Reduced

Ratio D/hadrons (or D/0) enhanced and sensitive to medium properties

A.Dainese nucl-ex/0311004

tpp

tAA

collAA dpdN

dpdNN

R//1

Page 28: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 33

Jet reconstruction Jets are produced copiously

pt (GeV)2 20 100 200100/event 1/event 100K/year

4 108 central PbPb collisions/month

6 105 events

ALICE Acceptance

Page 29: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 34

50 GeV jet

50 – 100 GeV jets in Pb–Pb

η–φ lego plot with Δη 0.08 Δφ 0.25

At large enough jet energy – jet clearly visibleBut still large fluctuation in underlying energy

Central Pb–Pb event (HIJING simulation) with 100 GeV di-jet (PYTHIA simulation)

C. Loizides

100 GeV

Page 30: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 35

Energy fluctuation in UE

Mean energy in a coneof radius R coming from underlying event

Fluctuation of energy from an underlying event in a cone of radius R

Page 31: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 36

Irreducible limits on jet energy resolution

Small radius of jet cone (R = 0.3) we don’t see 30% of energy underlying event fluctuation ~ 16% for 100 GeV jet

Larger jet-cone radius (R = 0.7) we don’t see 10% of energy underlying event fluctuation ~ 35% for 100 GeV jet

We cannot just add non-seen energy outside jet cone as is usually done in pp where jet shape is known that depends on energy distribution which we have to study

It’s impossible to know jet energy better than 22 – 30% (for 100 GeV jets)

we are now at 30 %, pretty close…

E = 100 GeV

22%

Intrinsic limit

Page 32: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 37

Jet energy resolution using Jet energy resolution using charged particlescharged particles

160-190

90-110

64-77

44-53

30-37

Input spectrum for given interval of reconstructed energy. Cone-size: R = 0.3, pT > 2 GeV

(R<1 = parton energy)

Charged/neutral fluctuations dominate:

E/E > 50%

Page 33: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 38

Proposed ALICE EMCALProposed ALICE EMCAL

•EM Sampling Calorimeter (STAR Design)•Pb-scintillator linear response

• -0.7 < < 0.7•

• 12 super-modules• 19152 towers• Energy resolution ~15%/√E

Improved jet-energy resolution

Trigger for high-energy jets

Larger acceptance for high-pt

Page 34: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 39

EMCALEMCALDirectional and Energy ResolutionDirectional and Energy Resolution

•Modified UA1 cone algorithm•Uses combination of tracking and calorimeter information•Cone Radius: R = 0.3, Seed 4.6 GeV, Minimum Jet energy 14 GeV•Background HIJING PbPb b = 0-5 fm

S. Blyth QM’04S. Blyth QM’04

Page 35: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 40

Jet quenching

Excellent jet reconstruction… but challenging to measure medium modification of its shape…

Et=100 GeV (reduced average jet energy fraction inside R): Radiated energy ~20% R=0.3 E/E=3% Et

UE ~ 100 GeV

RMedium induced redistribution of jet energy occurs inside cone

C.A. Salgado, U.A. Wiedemann hep-ph/0310079

vacuum

medium

Et = 50 GeV

Et = 100 GeV

0.200 0.4 0.6 0.8 10.2

R=√(2+2)

0.40.60.8

10

0.20.40.60.8

1

(R)

Page 36: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 41

Fragmentation functions

0 0.5 1z

10-4

10-2

1vacuummedium

pjet

z

kt

z=pt/pjet

Look also for transversefragmentation function (kt)

Page 37: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 42

Fraction of energy inside coneall particles – and low pt

Page 38: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 43

pp physics All of previously mentioned observables have to be measured

also in pp collisions for comparison with heavy-ion results

However, there are interesting questions regarding pp collisions themselves, for example

charged multiplicity distributioncorrelations between mean pt and multiplicity or strangenessstudy of diffractive events - with large rapidity gaps jet physics…

ALICE advantages w.r.t. other pp detectors

lower pt cut-offparticle identification

(see ALICE Note: P.Giubellino, K.S. et al.: Day One…)

Page 39: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 44

Who carry baryon number Standard point of view

quarks have baryon charge 1/3 gluons have zero baryon charge

Baryon number is carried by quarks, not by gluons

It is not obvious baryon number can be transferred by specific configuration of gluon

field

Page 40: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 45

Exchange in t-channelExchange of spin 1/2 (quark)

exp (-1/2 y) (~ s-1/2)strong damping with rapidity interval (i.e. for annihilation with energy)

Exchange of spin 1 (gluon) const.

no damping at all

Q: what is actually exchanged ?

q

q q

J

This exchanged is suppressed

q qJ

This exchange is not

Page 41: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 46

Central region at LHCAsymmetry AB = 2 * (B – anti-B) / (B + anti-B)

in %

at LHC (B. Kopeliovich)

– 9 ← η

H1 (HERA)Δη ~ 7

Page 42: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 47

Statistics needed For proton – antiproton one needs precision ~ 1%

the effect is about 7%, compare to 3 % in ‘normal’ case using ALICE acceptance, efficiency etc. this needs few times 104

minimum bias pp events, i.e. something like first 100 sec of running

Larger effect expected for strange particle, Lambda – anti-Lambda about 15%

for this few times 105 events will do

For Omega – anti-Omega a huge effect is expected (under some assumptions even 100%)

100 Omegas would be enough for that – order of 107 events a ‘good day’ of running will do it all

Page 43: ALICE Performance

27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 48

ALICE is open for new ideasALICE is open for new ideas