alain blondel, 24 july 2006 na49/t2k phone meeting na49/t2k introduction to the physics case...

5
Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting NA49/T2K Introduction to the physics case Preamble: since I have not myself run any code or simulations of performan what follows aims at bringing out arguments to build up the physics case f the T2K NA49 proposal.

Upload: clemence-strickland

Post on 17-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting NA49/T2K Introduction to the physics case Preamble: since I have not myself run any code or simulations

Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting

NA49/T2K

Introduction to the physics case

Preamble: since I have not myself run any code or simulations of performance what follows aims at bringing out arguments to build up the physics case for the T2K NA49 proposal.

Page 2: Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting NA49/T2K Introduction to the physics case Preamble: since I have not myself run any code or simulations

Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting

philosophy: envisage this experiment as if it would never be done again

==> get from CERN assurance that either we collect a sufficient amount of data in the first couple of years, (preferred solution)or that the apparatus is preserved in a good enough state From HARP experience these measurements are everything but easy.

Do the measurement to a quality level that allows sufficient precision to the end of the programme

Page 3: Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting NA49/T2K Introduction to the physics case Preamble: since I have not myself run any code or simulations

Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting

Standard Oscillation framework --Four different phases/precision levels

1. Precision measurements of disappearance channel --> Atmospheric parameters: m2

23 , sin2 23

Here we are mostly concerned about the far/near ratio for CC events

useful plots: Far/near for non-oscillated and sensitivity to K/pi ratio, Pion average mom., average pT or

model.

2. Discovery or confirmation of the e channel --> order of magnitude of 13

need good measurement of (at least) the K/pi ratio since this affects the near/far ratio

for e background and background

useful plots: Far/near for e background and background

3. Precise measurement of P( e) for comparison with e.g. D-CHOOZ for CP or NOvA for matter

effects (statistical error will depend on 13)Useful plots: all of the above +?

4. Ultimate measure: ACP in T2HK or T2KK etc…need a precise measurement of the neutrino and antineutrino fluxes for numu and nue, with perhaps one overall normalization missing. From the HyperK plots 2% systematics already bites into the stat. precision?some antineutrino plots?

Non Standard Oscillation: ex: disappearance measurements in the NC channel check serile neutrinos etc…

useful plots: Far/near for non-oscillated e ?

Page 4: Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting NA49/T2K Introduction to the physics case Preamble: since I have not myself run any code or simulations

Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting

from Hiraide

Page 5: Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting NA49/T2K Introduction to the physics case Preamble: since I have not myself run any code or simulations

Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting

from Fechner