air comp lug in

Upload: makhful-adhim

Post on 07-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    1/40

    www.awe-communications.com

    WinProp Multi Scenario Model

    for Aircom Enterprise

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    2/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 2

    Outline

    Motivation

    Algorithm

    Installation

    Configuration and Features

    Performance Evaluation

    Enterprise Standard Models vs. Multi Scenario Model

    Enhanced Features

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    3/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 3

    Motivation

    Only simple wave propagation models available in AircomEnterprise

    Important wave propagation effects are not considered by

    simple wave propagation models One new wave propagation model for all scenarios

    needed:

    Vector building data

    Clutter / landusage

    Topography

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    4/40December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 4

    Typical Scenario

    Vector building

    data

    Topographicaldata

    Land usage data

    Topographical data

    Algorithm

    Complete predictionarea

    Transition

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    5/40December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 5

    Multi Scenario Model

    Algorithm

    Combination of semi-deterministic and empirical wavepropagation models

    Semi-deterministic model: 3D Urban Dominant Path Model

    Empirical models: Hata-Okumura, Empirical Two-Ray, Deterministic Two-Ray

    Automatic transition

    Suitable for large scenariosSemi-

    deterministicmodel

    Empirical

    model

    Transition

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    6/40December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 6

    3D Urban Dominant Path Model (1/ 3)

    Algorithm

    Only dominant path relevant

    Calibration possible

    Suitable for all scenarios

    Short prediction times

    High accuracy

    S

    E

    S

    E

    S

    EEmpirical Ray Optical Dominant Path

    No preprocessing of

    database in contrast toIRT

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    7/40December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 7

    3D Urban Dominant Path Model (2/ 3)

    Algorithm

    Analysis of wedges in the scenario

    Construction of a tree

    Finding the best propagation path

    convexwedges

    T

    Layer 1

    Layer 3

    Layer 4

    Layer 2

    4 52

    24 25R5 4

    5R 5 424 2R

    RR

    T

    R

    concave wedges convex wedges1

    1

    2

    34

    5

    23 46 5

    6

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    8/40

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    9/40December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 9

    Empirical Vertical Plane Models

    Algorithm

    Hata-Okumura Model

    4 submodels (open/suburban/medium urban/dense urban)

    Akeyama Extension

    COST 207 for frequencies in the 2 GHz band

    Two-Ray Models

    Direct ray and ground reflected ray

    Either deterministic (with check of visibility and check of reflection) orempirical (assuming always LOS)

    Knife Edge Diffraction Extension

    Consideration of topography in vertical plane between Tx and Rx

    ll i

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    10/40December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 10

    Installation

    Copy WinProp plug-in package (*.zip) into the subfolderCommon of the Enterprise main directory and unzip thezip archive

    Launch the batch file Install WinProp Multi ScenarioModel which is also located in the Common folder

    Install the license (USB dongle / license file)

    Start Aircom Enterprise and add the WinProp model toyour project

    C fi ti

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    11/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 11

    Property Page: General

    Configuration

    Definition of frequency and prediction height

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    12/40

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    13/40

    Configuration

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    14/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 14

    Property Page: Model Settings

    Configuration

    Definition of settings for 3D Dominant Path Model

    Definition of pathloss exponents andbreak point factor

    Interaction lossesdue to diffractions or

    transmissions

    Adaptive resolutionfor acceleration

    Empirical indoorprediction model

    Configuration

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    15/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 15

    Property Page: Large Areas

    Configuration

    Definition of settings for large areas

    Transition toempirical model after

    certain distance

    Selection ofempirical prediction

    model and itsparameters

    Knife edgediffraction algorithm

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    16/40

    Performance Evaluation

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    17/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 17

    Performance Evaluation

    Wave guiding effects in urban street canyons

    Diffractions at corners

    Computation time: less than 30 s

    3D Urban Dominant Path Model: Tx in Street Canyon (2/ 2)

    Performance Evaluation

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    18/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 18

    Performance Evaluation

    Simulation settings

    Prediction resolution 5 m

    Prediction radius 500 m

    Height of m obile station 1.5 m

    Considered databases Vector buildings & Topo

    TX frequency 1800 MHz

    Max. TX power 43 dBm

    TX antenna height 25 m, 30 m, 35 m

    Azimuth of TX antenna 225

    Downti lt of TX antenna 0

    3D Urban Dominant Path Model: Tx above roof tops (1/ 2)

    Scenario:Bern (Switzerland)

    Performance Evaluation

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    19/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 19

    Performance Evaluation

    Antenna height: 30 m Antenna height: 35 mAntenna height: 25 m

    Shadows of buildings visible in prediction (depending on building heights)

    The higher the antenna, the better the coverage (smaller shadows of buildings)

    In-house prediction with Exponential Decrease Model

    Prediction time: less than 30 s

    3D Urban Dominant Path Model: Tx above roof tops (2/ 2)

    Performance Evaluation

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    20/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 20

    Performance Evaluation

    Scenario:Bern (Switzerland)

    Simulation settings

    Prediction resolution 5 m

    Prediction radius 500 m

    Height of m obile station 1.5 m

    Considered databases Vector buildings & Topo

    TX frequency 1800 MHz

    Max. TX power 43 dBm

    TX antenna height 15 m, 40 m

    Azimuth of TX antenna 15

    Downti lt of TX antenna 3

    3D Urban Dominant Path Model: Tx at open place (1/ 3)

    Performance Evaluation

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    21/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 21

    Performance Evaluation

    Antenna height: 40 mAntenna height: 15 m

    3D Urban Dominant Path Model: Tx at open place (2/ 3)

    Computation time: less than 10 s

    Performance Evaluation

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    22/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 22

    Performance Evaluation

    Antenna height: 40 mAntenna height: 15 m

    Additional in-house prediction with Exponential Decrease Model

    Computation time: less than 20 s

    3D Urban Dominant Path Model: Tx at open place (3/ 3)

    Enterprise standard models vs. Multi Scenario DPM

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    23/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 23

    Default parameters: Enterprise Macrocell Model 3

    Model parameters

    Earth radius 8493 km

    k1 150.6 / 160.9

    k2 44.9

    k1 (near) 0.0

    k2 (near) 0.0

    k3 -2.55

    d < 0.0

    k4 0.0

    k5 -13.82

    k6 -6.55

    k7 0.7 / 0.8

    Effect iv e antenna hei gh t (Heff) algorit hm absolu te

    Diffraction loss algorithm Epstein Peterson

    Merge knife edges closer than Not used

    clutters Not used

    ASSET 3G User Reference GuideVersion 5.2.1 page 40

    (values for 900 / 1800MHz)

    Enterprise standard models vs. Multi Scenario DPM

    Enterprise standard models vs. Multi Scenario DPM

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    24/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 24

    Default parameters: Enterprise M icrocell Model

    Model parameters

    Earth radius - 6370 km

    Loss at one meter LOS area 41.2 / 41.5 dB

    Antenna height gain LOS area 12.6 / 8.2

    Near slope LOS area 8.7 / 16.3 dB/ dec

    Far slope LOS area 41.3 / 49.0 dB/ dec

    Breakpoint LOS area automatic

    Forw ard scatterer near slope (NLOS area) NLOS area 17.9 / 18.7 dB/ dec

    Forward scatterer far slope (NLOS area) NLOS area 17.9 / 18.7 dB/ dec

    Back scatterer near slope (NLOS area) NLOS area 0

    Back scatterer far slope (NLOS area) NLOS area 17.9 / 18.7 dB/ dec

    Ignore buildings < meters tall NLOS area 0 m

    Highest order virtual source NLOS area 2

    Max. distance to diffracting edge NLOS area 6

    Building penetration loss - 20 dB

    In-building slope - 1

    ASSET 3G User Reference GuideVersion 5.2.1 pages 50, 51

    (values for 900 / 1800 MHz)

    Enterprise standard models vs. Multi Scenario DPM

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    25/40

    Enterprise standard models vs. Multi Scenario DPM

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    26/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 26

    Urban Street Canyon (1/ 4): Scenario

    City of Istanbul (Turkey)

    Simulation settings

    Prediction resolution 5 m

    Prediction radius 500 m

    Height of m obile station 1.5 m

    Considered databases Vector buildings & Topo

    TX frequency 900 MHz

    Max. TX power 43 dBm

    TX antenna height 15 m, 25 m

    Azimuth of TX antenna 40

    Downti lt of TX antenna 2

    p

    Enterprise standard models vs. Multi Scenario DPM

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    27/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 27

    Urban Street Canyon (2/ 4): Enterprise Marcocell Model

    No wave guiding effects

    No consideration of buildings

    Computation time: 1 s

    Antenna height: 15 m Antenna height: 25 m

    p

    Enterprise standard models vs. Multi Scenario DPM

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    28/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 28

    Urban Street Canyon (3/ 4): Enterprise Mircocell Model

    Waveguiding (mulitple reflections) in street canyons not visible

    Diffractions at building corners not visible

    Computation time: 214 s

    Antenna height: 15 m Antenna height: 25 m

    p

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    29/40

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    30/40

    Enterprise standard models vs. Multi Scenario DPM

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    31/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 31

    Shadowing effects due to topography (2/ 3):

    Comparison of prediction results

    Enterprise Macrocell

    Enterprise Microcell

    Multi Scenario DPM

    Enterprise standard models vs. Multi Scenario DPM

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    32/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 32

    Shadowing effects due to topography (3/ 3):

    Analysis of prediction results

    Enterprise Marcocell Model

    No shadowing due to topography visible

    Computation time: 1s

    Enterprise Mircocell Model

    Influence of topography visible, but not as expected

    Computation time: 85 s

    3D Urban Dominant Path Model

    Wave guiding due to topography in the valley

    Shadowing effects due to higher elevations

    Computation time: 7 s

    Enterprise standard models vs. Multi Scenario DPM

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    33/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 33

    Shadow ing effects due to buildings (1/ 3): Scenario

    Simulation settings

    Prediction resolution 5 m

    Prediction radius 500 m

    Height of m obile station 1.5 m

    Considered databases Vector buildings & Topo

    TX frequency 900 MHz

    Max. TX power 43 dBm

    TX antenna height 10 m, 20 m

    Azimuth of TX antenna omni directional antenna

    Downtilt of TX antenna omni directional antenna

    City of Bern (Switzerland)

    Building height: 14 m

    Enterprise standard models vs. Multi Scenario DPM

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    34/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 34

    Shadowing effects due to buildings (2/ 3):

    Enterprise M ircocel l Model

    Influence of building not obviously visible

    Computation time: 63 s

    Antenna height: 10 m Antenna height: 20 m

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    35/40

    Enhanced Features

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    36/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 36

    Consideration of vegetation (1/ 2):

    Arbitrary modeled vegetation blocks possible (woods, fields, etc.)

    Antenna height: 10 m

    Antenna height: 20 m

    Antenna height: 30 m

    Vegetation modeling in a city center

    Enhanced Features

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    37/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 37

    Consideration of vegetation (2/ 2):

    Higher path loss values inside the vegetation blocks

    Antenna height: 30 m

    Enhanced Features

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    38/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 38

    Load predicted results w ith ProMan for detailed view :

    Prediction of in-house transmitters

    Penetration through huge glass doors and windows

    Indoor walls can be considered (if data is available)

    View propagation paths and detailed 3D view with ProMan

    Enhanced Features

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    39/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 39

    Load predicted results w ith ProMan for detailed view :

    Indoor prediction on multiple height levels

    Hybrid propagation mode for predictions on multiple building floors

  • 8/6/2019 Air Comp Lug In

    40/40

    December 2008 (c) by AWE Communications 40

    AWE CommunicationsOtto-Lilienthal-Str. 36

    71034 Boeblingen

    Germany

    Phone: +49 7031 71497 0Fax: +49 7031 71497 12

    [email protected]

    www.awe-communications.com