african union agenda 2063 capacity development plan framework€¦ · capacity development plan...
TRANSCRIPT
AFRICAN UNION AGENDA 2063
Capacity Development Plan Framework Buttressing Implementation of the First 10-Year Plan—“The Africa We Want”
This Report is a product of the African Capacity Building Foundation (ACBF). The findings, interpretations, and conclusions
expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the ACBF Executive Board or Board of Governors.
ACBF does not guarantee the precision of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, and other information shown on
any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the Foundation concerning the legal status of any territory or the
endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
The user is allowed to reproduce, distribute and publicly perform this publication without explicit permission, provided that the
content is accompanied by an acknowledgement that the African Capacity Building Foundation (ACBF) is the source. No part of this
publication can be used for commercial purposes or adapted/translated/modified without the prior permission of ACBF.
© 2016 The African Capacity Building Foundation
2, Fairbairn Drive, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
Produced by the Knowledge, Monitoring & Evaluation Department
The African Capacity Building Foundation
First printing February 2016
All rights reserved
For additional information on other knowledge products as well as project and program operations of the African Capacity Building
Foundation, please visit our website at the following address: http://www.acbf-pact.org
ISBN: 978-1-77937-064-8
EAN:9781779370648
iii
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS vii
OVERVIEW 1
Background 1Key recommendations and observations 1
General points of emphasis 1Refine and pursue the critical technical skill agenda for “The Africa We Want” 2Fund the capacity development investments required in the first 10-year plan 3Capacity development for Agenda 2063: A long-term, special focus 3Structure of this document 4
CHAPTER 1 BUILDING ON CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NEW AFRICAN VISION 5
Summary of major points of emphasis from the capacity needs assessment 5Conceptual approach and methodology in preparing the CDP framework 5
CHAPTER 2 KEY PROPOSALS FOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES 8
Proposal 1: Progressively build a capacity development ecosystem 8Proposal 2: Promote an African mind-set change and African ownership transformation capacity 9Proposal 3: Develop and promote transformative leadership capacity at all levels of leadership 10Proposal 4: Undertake institutional transformation, including reforming and retrofitting, to make
institutions more Agenda 2063 compliant 10Proposal 5: Prioritize the capacity development requirements for the first 10-year plan 11
Dimension 1: Recasting the African mind-set to a concept of African ownership 11Dimension 2: Identifying initial continental “flagship projects,” key development goals of
member states, and special development activities and initiatives 11Dimension 3: Scenario building/risk management and anticipating exigencies of the future 12
Proposal 6: Transfer shared responsibility to youth and women as central capacity pillars for Agenda 2063 13
iv
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Proposal 7: Use a targeted multistakeholder approach 13Proposal 8: Prioritize capacity for communicating and creating awareness of Agenda 2063 14Proposal 9: Expand capacity by mobilizing and engaging with stakeholders 14Proposal 10: Strengthen partnership development and management 14Proposal 11: Engender ownership by countries and a broad spectrum of Africans 15Proposal 12: Unconditionally emphasize self-financing: “Solving the solvable — Africa financing itself” 15Proposal 13: Enhance capacity for implementation and for monitoring and evaluation 16Proposal 14: Strengthen the implementation capacity of key institutions 16Proposal 15: Anchor to the Capacity Development Strategic Framework 16Proposal 16: Recognize and accept what constitutes the multifaceted importance of a CDP 17
CHAPTER 3 PROPOSED CONTINENTAL CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 18
CHAPTER 4 PROPOSED REGIONAL CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27
CHAPTER 5 PROPOSED NATIONAL CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 33
CHAPTER 6 PROPOSED CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THREE STAKEHOLDER GROUPS 39
Developing the multistakeholder CDP templates 39
CHAPTER 7 INDICATIVE CAPACITIES REQUIRED FOR FLAGSHIP PROGRAMS OF THE FIRST 10‑YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 46
CHAPTER 8 GAPS IN AFRICA’S CRITICAL TECHNICAL SKILL AREAS: SAMPLE ANALYSIS 57
Engineers 57Medical doctors and specialists 58Researchers and STEM specialists 58Three other critical skill areas 59
NOTES 61
v
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
REFERENCES 62
Boxes
1 Some urgent recommendations, particularly for enabling capacity 31.1 Points of emphasis from Capacity Requirements for the New African Vision 6
Figures
2.1 Capacity development ecosystem for Agenda 2063 92.2 The three strategic dimensions to be achieved under Agenda 2063 122.3 Two sets of capacity outcomes 148.1 Mining specialists and engineers 598.2 Geologists 608.3 Quantity surveyors 60
Tables
3.1 Continental start-up capacity interventions 194.1 Regional start-up capacity interventions 285.1 National start-up capacity interventions 346.1 Start-up capacity interventions for youth 406.2 Start-up capacity interventions for women 426.3 Start-up capacity interventions for academia and think tanks 447.1 Indicative capacities required for flagship programs of the first 10-year plan 47
vi
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Executive Secretary of the African Ca-pacity Building Foundation (ACBF) and the Chairperson of the African Union Commis-sion (AUC) are thankful to the institutions and individuals for putting together this im-portant capacity development plan. These include the leadership of the regional eco-nomic communities, the African Union (AU) Deputy Chairperson, AUC Commissioners, leadership of the AU specialized institutions, leadership of the AU organs, focal persons of the Office of the AUC Chairperson, the AUC Strategic Planning Department and the
Agenda 2063 Technical Team, representatives from various stakeholder groups, and other development institutions working closely with the AU, such as the African Develop-ment Bank and the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.
The ACBF and the AUC also extend their appreciation to the team from Capacity and Development Services, which prepared the plan on the basis of the Capacity Needs As-sessment and the Africa’s Critical Technical Skills reports.
vii
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
ACBF African Capacity Build-ing Foundation
AfDB African Development Bank
AMDC African Mineral Devel-opment Center
APRM African Peer Review Mechanism
AU African UnionAUC African Union
CommissionCD Capacity developmentCDP Capacity development
planCDSF Capacity Development
Strategic FrameworkCSO Civil society
organizationCTS Critical Technical SkillsDRM Domestic resource
mobilizationECA United Nations Econom-
ic Commission for Africa
HSGOC Heads of State and Government Orientation Committee
M&E Monitoring and evaluation
NEPAD New Partnership for Africa’s Development
PAP Pan-African ParliamentREC Regional economic
communitySTEM Science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics
TOR Terms of referenceTVET Technical and vocational
education and trainingUNDP United Nations Develop-
ment Program
Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts are U.S. dollars.
1
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
OVERVIEW
Background
Pursuing the vision of “an integrated, pros-perous and peaceful Africa, driven by its own citizens and representing a dynamic force in the global arena,” the Heads of State and Government at the June 2012 African Union (AU) Summit mandated that the Chairperson of the African Union Commission (AUC), in collaboration with several key institutions, develop an indigenous strategic framework for the continent’s transformation over the next 50 years. This framework was to be an-chored in inclusive growth and sustainable development.
During the AU Golden Jubilee Summit, Member States pledged to commit themselves to the continent’s development and techno-logical transformation through a continental strategic framework, Agenda 2063, and to national development plans through a peo-ple-driven process. Furthering decisions of the AU Executive Council, the AUC formu-lated goals, targets, and strategies to realize Agenda 2063.
The AUC decided to assess the capacities required for implementing Agenda 2063 at the continental and regional levels (and sub-sequently at the national level) and worked closely with the African Capacity Building Foundation (ACBF), which led the exercise conducted by the Capacity Team in 2015. Three documents from this review were this capacity development plan (CDP) framework document; Capacity Requirements for the New African Vision: Agenda 2063 — “The Af-rica We Want;” and African Critical Technical
Skills: Key Capacity Dimensions Needed for the First 10 Years of Agenda 2063. The pre-liminary findings and recommendations from the capacity needs assessment were presented to the June 2015 Heads of State and Gov-ernment Summit. The Summit emphasized the capacity dimensions for Agenda 2063, including:
• Critical, technical, and sector-specific skills and training.
• The importance of developing mechanisms to enhance the role of youth and women as central capacity pillars.
• Mind-set transformation, including setting up multistakeholder groups.
This CDP document proposes multilevel and multistakeholder CDPs that identify an initial set of foundational capacity-strengthening ac-tivities for the First 10-Year Implementation Plan (first 10-year plan) of Agenda 2063.
Key recommendations and observations
General points of emphasis
Capacity development (CD) is crucial for the first 10-year plan and for Agenda 2063 over-all. It needs large financial resources beyond the capacity of any single organization (or groups of them) if interventions are man-aged centrally at the continental and regional levels. Thus the CD approach embodied in this document is based on subsidiarity and
2
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
decentralization — hence the need for the mul-tilevel, multistakeholder approaches.
CD is essentially about pursuing three key goals: enhance skills of individuals and groups; enhance or improve enabling envi-ronments to get things done; and design or improve systems, processes, institutional structures, and modes of operation to achieve better outcomes and effectiveness.
Key stakeholder groups (Box 1) and indi-viduals are encouraged to mobilize and seek funding for CD at their levels. It is estimated that 80 percent of the needed CD interven-tions could be carried out by these groups and individuals, while 20 percent may be placed under the responsibility of continental and regional institutions.
In light of this split, the AU’s biggest role now is to go out forcefully to expand awareness, build commitment, negotiate buy-in, promote an African sense of confidence toward the future, and spin the wheels of a positive move-ment toward a greater Africa. This involves creating a sense of excitement for Africans at all levels (from the grassroots upwards) about owning and pursuing their aspirations in dif-ferent but complementary ways.
Considering other strategic dimensions of the larger “capacity picture” for Africa, the fol-lowing needs are also important:
• Build capacity inventories at various levels.
• Design and gather new data on various ca-pacity categories.
• Emphasize capacity retention and utilization.
• Map out intra-African mobility and mi gra tion of critical technically skilled professionals (including issues of demand and supply and opportunities and challenges).
• Potentially consider policy protocols on the brain-drain circulation of Africans within Africa.
Refine and pursue the critical technical skill agenda for “The Africa We Want”
A bold critical technical skill (CTS) agenda must be launched within this first year of im-plementation of the first 10-year plan. Such an agenda should prioritize:
• Dramatic increases in African CTS profes-sionals and specialists in key areas such as engineering, mining, physics, geology, irrigation, dams, and geographic informa-tion systems. From the sample analysis in Chapter 8, as well as more elaborate projections that are being established, the numbers required will generally be seven to ten times that of present levels. These required numbers ideally will be achieved by the end of the first 10-year plan (2023).
• Unprecedented emphasis on producing large numbers of technicians who have been trained in technical and vocational education and training (TVET).
• A huge emphasis and orientation toward boosting science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and training.
• A significant expansion of African research and the generation of contextualized knowledge and data to underpin Africa’s new narrative.
The CD imperatives related to the above re-quire attention to:
• New policy packages at the national level to orient and incentivize.
• Capacity-retention policies.
3
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
• Strategic negotiations with academia and the private sector.
• Data on existing pools of CTS specialists and TVET and STEM workers.
• Dialogue with CTS professional associa-tions in Africa and the diaspora.
• Targets set and monitored for the produc-tion of CTS.
Fund the capacity development investments required in the first 10-year plan
To raise the considerable investment capital required, it is proposed that vision-driven negotiations be initiated at once, involving national governments, the private sector, and academia. Leaders of CTS professional asso-ciations should also be brought in. The private
sector should be encouraged and empowered to design and implement win-win solutions for African CTS education.
The start-up seed funding for the CD priorities identified for the multilevel and multistake-holder CDPs in this document amounts to $28,610,000. It is proposed that almost all these activities be undertaken within the next two years. To calculate the complete cost, one would add the large amount of funds required to finance education and training imperatives, including those focusing on CTS, TVET, and STEM.
Capacity development for Agenda 2063: A long-term, special focus
It is vital that the AU system be supported in a sustained way by specialized entities work-ing on capacity issues. In this spirit, it would be useful to consider and institutionalize the
Box 1 Some urgent recommendations, particularly for enabling capacity
AUC/AU and institutions Lead responsibility
Set up a central implementation entity at the AUC and focal teams within continental and regional institutions
AUC (Chairperson’s Office)
Lead and drive the mind-set transformation agenda AUC, with support from the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) and the regional economic communities (RECs)
Sustain the Agenda 2063 vision through urgent identification and promotion of “champion roles” involving current and former Heads of State and top private sector leadership
AU/AUC/NEPAD
Rationalize the institutional architecture and roles of institutions to make them Agenda 2063-compliant
AU/AUC/institutions and RECs
Create and train small and focused domestic resource mobilization (DRM) “brigade units” in key institutions
All concerned continental, regional, and national institutions
Member States
Set up Agenda 2063 focal points Key ministries concerned
Domesticate, national-contextualize, and build awareness of the first 10-year plan’s activities
Key stakeholder groups and individualsa
Take responsibility for identifying, proposing, and putting in place their respective interface mechanisms/representatives/structures engaging in the activities and dialogue for Agenda 2063
Stakeholder groups, working with AU institutions and RECs
a. Includes youth, women, the diaspora, African celebrities, traditional leaders, faith-based organizations, the private sector, civil society organi-
zations (CSOs), and academia and think tanks.
Source: ACBF Capacity Team.
4
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
support of entities such as the African Capac-ity Building Foundation (ACBF). The ACBF will work closely with the NEPAD Agency and institutional entities in the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), as well as with the African Development Bank (AfDB). It may also be helpful to integrate expertise on capacity issues within the im-plementation entity and focal teams under the AUC.
Structure of this document
The rest of this document is divided into eight chapters. Chapter 1 shows how this document builds on the findings and recommenda-tions of Capacity Requirements for the New
African Vision: Agenda 2063 — “The Africa We Want.” The particularly important Chapter 2 presents key proposals from the Capacity Team to guide priorities and planning.
Chapters 3, 4, and 5 outline three multilevel CDPs, at the continental, regional, and na-tional levels, and Chapter 6, in a similar vein, presents three sample CDPs for academia, youth, and women.
Chapter 7 gives indicative capacities required for the flagship programs of the first 10-year plan. Chapter 8 finishes with a sample analy-sis of projections in a few CTS areas (a topic more fully explored in African Critical Tech-nical Skills).
5
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
1BUILDING ON CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
NEW AFRICAN VISION
In formulating the foundational areas for ca-pacity building expressed in this document, the Capacity Team drew on the findings and recommendations that emerged from the ca-pacity needs assessment. This assessment is documented in Capacity Requirements for the New African Vision: Agenda 2063 — “The Africa We Want,” which this chapter briefly summarizes.
In assessing the capacities required for achiev-ing Agenda 2063, the Team “unpacked” Africa’s transformative vision and analyzed the question: “Capacity for what?” It found that the fundamental broad capacities fall into three key strategic dimensions, which capture the essence of Africa’s Agenda 2063 vision:
• Dimension 1: recasting the African mind-set to a concept of African ownership.
• Dimension 2: identifying initial continental “flagship projects,” key development goals of member states, and special development activities and initiatives.
• Dimension 3: scenario building/risk man-agement and anticipating exigencies of the future.
The capacity review exercise produced major findings in broad capacity categories and made recommendations, all reflecting the multifaceted nature of capacity-enhancing priorities for succeeding in Agenda 2063.
Summary of major points of emphasis from the capacity needs assessment
Box 1.1 highlights the key messages taken from Capacity Requirements for the New African Vision. They were used as building blocks for the key proposals (chapter 2) and the CDPs (chapters 3–6).
Conceptual approach and methodology in preparing the CDP framework
Given the multidimensional nature and long-term vision of Agenda 2063, it is important that an equally innovative “CD” approach be developed that goes beyond the classic approach to CDPs. Hence the Capacity Team here proposes CDP templates that go beyond the production of one “umbrella” CDP. In-stead, the templates develop multilevel and multistakeholder CDPs to enhance the plan-ning of initial CD efforts.
The conceptual and methodological approach is based on the following:
A multilevel approach. The Team developed initial CDPs at the continental, regional, and national levels.
A multistakeholder approach. This recognizes the need for CDPs that address the CD needs of key stakeholder groups (see box 1).
6
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Rolling, planning, updating, and expanding. During the first 10-year plan, the first CDP could aim for a timeframe of three years, with an adjusted set of CDPs for the last four of the first 10 years (until 2023).
Sources of funding — human, financial, and technological. One of the advantages of a multistakeholder approach is the potential for increasing the sources of funding on the basis of a decentralized, multilevel ap-proach. Moreover, this approach seeks to
“responsibilize” various levels of organiza-tions (continental, regional, and national) and stakeholder groups to commit them-selves to continuously re-identifying funding sources. It also enables a closer linking of CD requirements with actual Agenda 2063 activities.
Foundational and critical-path analysis. The Team first identified fundamental items — soft skills, composite capacities, and mind-set transformation. All these key issues
Box 1.1 Points of emphasis from Capacity Requirements for the New African Vision
Africa has diverse capacities at various levels that will help it firmly engage in implementing the First 10-Year Implementation Plan (the first 10-year plan) and Agenda 2063, but for it to be more effective some key capac-ities need urgent attention:
• Transformative and change abilities (including transformative leadership and change readiness).
• Improved capacities of institutions and organizations — continental, regional, and national — involving the restructuring and refocusing of work systems and a review of mandates.
• Investments in massive training and education for critical, technical, and sector-specific skills, including in STEM.
• An urgent revamping of the content of African education at all levels, so that educated Africans (including children and youth) are imbued with African values and visionary optimism and can find or create substan-tive employment.
• A move toward a Pan-African “New African” agenda through an African ideological grounding for those on the continent and in the diaspora,
• The start of a progressive transfer to youth and women of key responsibilities for leading parts of Agenda 2063 within the first two years of the first 10-year plan.
• The ability of the continent to commit and mobilize its own funding for the first 10-year plan and Agenda 2063. This will be the litmus test of “capacity.”
• An increase in soft skills, which are indispensable for each person to make things happen.
• Crucially and urgently, dimension 1 (recasting the African mind-set to a concept of African ownership) would then guide Africa’s development paradigm based on African values.
7
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
are critical game-changers and drivers of transformation, acting together as in a com-plex ecosystem. They are key elements of transformative capacity and need to be in
place from the outset, at the core of imple-mentation. Transformative development is framed in the long term as an essential out-come of Agenda 2063.
8
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
2KEY PROPOSALS FOR CAPACITY
DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES
Based on substantive and conceptual analy-sis, this chapter presents 16 key proposals for prioritizing and developing interventions for the first 10-year plan and subsequently laying the foundations for the later implementation phases of Agenda 2063.
Proposal 1: Progressively build a capacity development ecosystem
The starting point in implementing Agenda 2063 is with several critical game-changers and drivers of transformation, acting together in an ecosystem as foundational elements of transformative capacity.
The ecosystem has four layers (figure 2.1): the individual level (red), the change agents (white), the context environment (dark blue), and the enabling environment (light blue). The CD eco-system works from the inner circle outwards.
At the center (the red circle) is the “new Afri-can.” In the broad context of Agenda 2063, she or he, whether an elected leader or an individ-ual citizen, should be deeply “conscientized,” Pan-Africanist, and results-driven. He or she must be fully self-aware, with a strong African identity, and must have gone through training, learning by doing, and formal and informal/indigenous education as adapted to the practical exigencies of Africa in the 21st century — the new Africa. Some form of ideology that guides and directs effort, knowledge, skills, and institutions is necessary to bring about trans-formation in Africa at the individual level.
“Ideology” in this context refers to a visionary theory of self-confidence, with bold belief in and pursuit of a great destiny, anchored in the African body system and the drive to own and manage African resources and progress.
The individual connects closely with the change agents (white). They are knowledgeable stakeholder groups and individuals — skilled, committed, highly motivated, and high-performing — and can start now. These change agents should be totally transformed into new kinds of Africans who can inspire and mobilize others for action.
Following this process of reframing the New Af-rican, the next tier of the ecosystem (dark blue) is the context within which stakeholder groups and individuals apply themselves, via institu-tions, resources, transformative leadership, and hard and soft skills. Individuals function more effectively within institutions that provide a strong foundation. Access to resources — or the lack of it — affects individuals’ ability to function and hence their productivity. Without a well-structured and functioning institutional setting, therefore, individuals are only individ-uals. Effective institutions serve as the crucible within which individuals and other resources interact to generate desired outcomes, and it is in these institutions that individuals, their skills, and their collective knowledge come together.
The final layer (light blue) is the enabling environment that promotes productivity, val-ue-chain thinking, results orientation, and a transformative agenda. The first 10-year plan
9
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
should be solidly anchored in an African set of values that motivate and guide stakehold-er groups and individuals. It should also be anchored in a political economy and a social system that is founded on a clear, motivating, and single-purpose ideological paradigm with-in which people and institutions will function.
CD is not a one-time event. The ecosystem con-cept underscores this, going beyond traditional capacity “building.” The essential outcome is transformation generated and sustained over time and from within. Transformation of this kind goes beyond performing tasks.
Proposal 2: Promote an African mind-set change and African ownership transformation capacity1
The results of the capacity needs assessment showed that the continent has to make a
fundamental mind-set shift. A deeper para-digm, ideology, and existential identity are needed for Agenda 2063 to materialize. This will not happen just because it is desired. It will require the purposeful construction, nur-turing, and harnessing of key change drivers. These areas, especially the often-neglected “soft” and transformative capacities, have to be developed, after which they will constitute a new foundation for Africa to believe in its capacity to be a great continent, bringing and managing prosperity and peace to its people.
In particular, the “average” African’s self-confidence and positive mind-set that urgent change is necessary and possible are perhaps the most critical success factors for realizing the vision. These two areas present a challenge to Africans to take charge of their destiny and to believe and pursue the quest for development and prosperity. For this to happen, and for Africa to really “rise,” there
Figure 2.1 Capacity development ecosystem for Agenda 2063
Individual level
African values
Ideas
Mind-setIdeology
SocializationSelf-con�dence
Professionalism
Enterprising and industrious
Performance Value chains
People’s movement
Knowledge
DemandNew culture
Pride of purpose Performance
Hard skills
Resources
Lead
ersh
ip
Institu
tion
s
Source: Adapted by ACBF Capacity Team from UNDG Primer (UNDP 2009).
10
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
needs to be a collective mind-set shift leading to a focus on a new and positive narrative, a capacity to dream of a different and better reality, and a capability to turn the dream into reality, starting today. Without these critical ingredients, detractors and negativity will sap essential energies. Creating the highly effec-tive “New African” requires that urgent action be taken to promote new belief, confidence, mind-set transformation, and commitment to build a new Africa.
In prioritizing the foundational CD needs for the first 10-year plan it is crucial to stress, on the one hand, CD for African mind-set and ownership transformation, including change readiness, and, on the other, human capacity (hard and soft skills), as well as other funda-mental and systemic capacities that need to be tackled starting now.
The existential imperative for change and transformation to ensure buy-in, broad-based acceptance, and a movement for transforma-tion in turn requires radical and visionary leadership. Another critical success factor is an engaged and committed citizenry with confidence in that leadership.
In addition, there must be a support mecha-nism for the transformation, while change agents must be encouraged to innovate, take risks, and explore nontraditional ideas. An-other prerequisite is robust transformative institutional architecture, with values- oriented institutions.
Proposal 3: Develop and promote transformative leadership capacity at all levels of leadership
The new Agenda 2063 individual stakehold-er groups need leadership at all levels that is visionary, recognizes and nurtures talent, creates space for individual expression, and
motivates and brings out the best in people. Engaging and participatory leadership are critical for high-performing individuals who thrive in environments that engender recogni-tion and reward excellence and achievement. Without such leadership, the continent will continue to lose its best- educated and skilled professionals to competing, more motivating environments.
Proposal 4: Undertake institutional transformation, including reforming and retrofitting, to make institutions more Agenda 2063 compliant
Agenda 2063 needs institutions that are fit-for-purpose — institutions with mandates aligned to the seven aspirations:
• A prosperous Africa based on inclusive growth and sustainable development.
• An integrated continent, politically united and based on the ideals of Pan-Africanism.
• An Africa of good governance, respect for human rights, justice, and the rule of law.
• A peaceful and secure Africa.
• An Africa with values, ethics, and a strong cultural identity.
• An Africa whose development is peo-ple-driven, relying especially on the potential offered by its youth and women.
• An Africa as a strong and influential global player and partner.
Delivering on Agenda 2063, start-ing with the first 10-year plan, requires fit-for-purpose institutions that provide the operational environment that encompasses
11
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
a coherent set of policies, structures, and or-ganizations. These institutions also provide physical infrastructure and systems (including technology, procedures, and work processes) conducive to motivated and high-performing individuals. Effective institutions also cre-ate opportunities and build up the potential of individuals to expand their capabilities. Well-developed institutions — supported by skilled individuals, structures, and systems for applying knowledge, alongside clear account-ability mechanisms — enhance performance, allowing arrangements for implementation to be stronger and more efficient, adaptable, and resilient.
Some CD elements will be centered on the institutions and organizations with man-dates to lead the Agenda 2063 processes by reengineering systems and work processes; harmonizing mandates and functions; struc-turally configuring existing institutional architecture; and enhancing institutional capacities at the continental, regional, and na-tional levels and among stakeholder groups.
Africa needs an existential ideology to gal-vanize Africans into action and to sustain the transformation. This ideology is equiva-lent to the “total liberation of Africa,” a war cry of the 1960s that galvanized Africans and sympathizers everywhere into a unity of purpose: the eradication of all forms of colo-nialism. The Organization of African Unity was itself established with this mandate. The policies and actions of governments of independents states were aligned with it, and institutions and structures — including laws, power relations, and social norms governing civic engagement — were enact-ed in pursuit of the liberation struggles. A similar enabling environment to stimulate collective capacity will be essential to create the urgency, impetus, policies, and broad-based citizen action for implementing Agenda 2063.
Proposal 5: Prioritize the capacity development requirements for the first 10-year plan
Starting with the first 10 years, the Capac-ity Team addressed the question: What are the kinds of capacities necessary to achieve Agenda 2063? In addressing it, the Team un-dertook a substantive analysis of the purpose, content, and activities of the Agenda, which led the Team to “unpack” it into three strate-gic dimensions (figure 2.2).
This approach enables us to understand the elements of work that need be accomplished to achieve the outputs and outcomes in this bold vision. This unpacking therefore provides a first strategic response to the question: Capacity for what?
Dimension 1: Recasting the African mind-set to a concept of African ownership
A very important dimension of Agenda 2063, and a departure from previous development frameworks, is the emphasis on the need for Africa to master its own destiny through efforts and processes driven and managed by its own citizens. Achieving this dimension will be essential in paving the way for the two other dimensions to succeed, in a way that portrays Africa’s own development paradigm. Thus, accompanying the CD dimension is a call for social, economic, and political rejuvenation — a call for action to reenergize the African citizenry and rekindle the spirit of working together toward collective prosperity and a common destiny in a united and strong Africa.
Dimension 2: Identifying initial continental “flagship projects,” key development goals of member states, and special development activities and initiatives
This dimension requires skills in the areas of programming as well as activity planning and
12
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
execution. It also requires “hard” technical or specialist subject knowledge and skill sets that are critical for implementing flagship projects and other programs of the 10-year plan. This dimension is not new, as it has been included in other continental frameworks such as the Lagos Action Plan, the African Economic Treaty, and, most importantly, the 1963 Organization of African Unity Summit Resolution (which laid the foundation for the continent’s development). Fulfilling Agenda 2063 will require capacity enhancement and revamping of resources, institutional capaci-ty, and systems and work processes. Critical skills are also required in engineering, energy, mining, financial management, science and technology, and information and communica-tions technology (ICT).
Dimension 3: Scenario building/risk management and anticipating exigencies of the future
This dimension raises the need for adaptable knowledge systems and structures to man-age risks and to build resilience. Member States should be able to anticipate society’s growing needs and future challenges and develop appropriate interventions to deal with them. This dimension requires strate-gic, forward-planning and scenario-building capacities for the 21st century and beyond. It also requires Africa to show the willingness and ability to explore new opportunities, set its own agenda, and experiment with viable alternative approaches to addressing emerg-ing issues and challenges.
Figure 2.2 The three strategic dimensions to be achieved under Agenda 2063
Dimension 1Recasting the
African mindset toa concept of
African ownership
Dimension 3Scenario building/
risk management andanticipating future exigencies
Dimension 2Identifying initial
continental “�agshipprojects,” key development
goals of memberstates, and special
development activitiesand initiatives
Source: ACBF Capacity Team.
13
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Capacities for the three dimensions must act together in symbiotic equilibrium for mutual coexistence and reinforcement. Further, all the actors and actions (entities or subsystems) in the ecosystem (see figure 2.1) have to work in a synchronized fashion, operate toward a common purpose, and be governed by com-mon rules and processes. This will create the necessary momentum for transforming the continent and fulfilling Agenda 2063’s aspirations.
Proposal 6: Transfer shared responsibility to youth and women as central capacity pillars for Agenda 2063
Agenda 2063 is about the future. Those who will live in that future must be given ample op-portunity to shape the Africa they want. One of the seven aspirations (an Africa whose devel-opment is people-driven, relying especially on the potential offered by its youth and women) specifically focuses on the two groups. Their role must therefore be center stage, and the implementation of the first 10-year plan must begin from the premise that it will integrate and mainstream programs led by, and focusing on, them. Deliberate and urgent steps should be taken to transfer responsibility for driving and planning aspects of Agenda 2063 to the many capable and committed young men and women, and to women of all ages.
Proposal 7: Use a targeted multistakeholder approach
CD’s effectiveness will be a core measure in assessing the formulation, benchmarking, implementation, and evaluation of programs and projects in the first 10-year plan. As-sessment also covers investments, including institutional arrangements, systems and pro-cesses, knowledge and skills access/transfer
and augmentation, and the measurement of CD outcomes in the transformation. There-fore, CD targets should be set for each goal and priority area.
A central CD principle would be that all Agenda 2063 investments and activities must aim to achieve two sets of capacity outcomes (figure 2.3), with activities and indicators de-signed to achieve the following:
• Systemic, composite capacities that con-tribute to the broad goals by ensuring that systems thinking and critical-path approaches are adopted, and by generating knowledge, innovation, and learning for other development interventions.
• Critical technical and functional capacities specific to the priority areas of the first 10-year plan and essential for program/project implementation (in necessary skills, sys-tems, processes, and institutional structures).
The approach provides a basis for a decentralized, disaggregated, multilevel, mul-tistakeholder process, increasing the diversity of funding sources for targeted CD interven-tions by stakeholder groups and individuals. Their involvement eliminates the challenge of having to identify and manage funds for one umbrella CD plan. Rather, stakeholders will identify their needs and mobilize and commit resources to address them within a common framework.
Further, this approach also enables a closer linking of CD requirements to the Agenda 2063 activities pursued (by organizations at various levels and stakeholders). Stakeholders will thus take responsibility for developing specific capacity for their projects and areas of operation, while helping improve system-lev-el capacity outcomes — creating stability and building resilience through investments for innovation and continuous improvement.
14
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Proposal 8: Prioritize capacity for communicating and creating awareness of Agenda 2063
A prerequisite for effective implementation of Agenda 2063 is awareness across sectors and an essential understanding of its essence at various levels. Within the first few years, con-crete steps must be taken to adopt and adapt the agenda to national contexts and to ensure collective commitment. Sharing information, creating awareness of goals, communicating the need for Africa’s transformation, and effectively communicating processes and out-comes in an ongoing and structured manner is critical. The capacity for these has to be strengthened across the continent.
Proposal 9: Expand capacity by mobilizing and engaging with stakeholders
Agenda 2063 calls on all Africans — businesses, religious communities, ordinary citizens,
women’s and youth leaders, and policymakers at all levels — to act in concert to overcome the challenges facing Africa. It is therefore necessary to mobilize stakeholders (public, nonpublic, and nonstate) as integral parts of mechanisms for delivering development ser-vices and the results chain at the continental, regional, and national levels. Capacity for the coordination and supporting activities of stakeholders, in particular the private sector and CSOs, is critical and must be strengthened. Mechanisms will be put in place to facilitate continual engagement among stakeholders to make Agenda 2063 a truly participatory trans-formative agenda.
Proposal 10: Strengthen partnership development and management
A primary mechanism for imple-menting Agenda 2063 will comprise crosscutting and multilevel (particularly African) partnerships, collaboration, and networking, requiring a broad range of
Figure 2.3 Two sets of capacity outcomes
Support forholistic capacitydevelopmentprocesses
ImpactOutcomesProjectoutput
Projectimpact
Projectoutcome
Projectoutput
Project results
Development results
Systemiccapacity
Implementationcapacity
Inputs
Inputs
Project-relatedcapacity building
Otherinterventions
Source: ACBF Capacity Team.
15
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
actors to participate in, amplify efforts toward, and add value to the continen-tal development effort. A robust African partnership framework is necessary at the continental, regional, and national levels to promote ownership, facilitate ongoing learning, ensure engagement in implement-ing actions, and document and provide case evidence. Formalized partnership arrange-ments will be useful with organizations expected to play key roles.
Partners should be identified on the basis of their potential value addition to imple-mentation, that is, bringing intellectual capital (including institutional knowledge, expertise, and know-how); human, mate-rial, institutional, and technical assets; and financial resources that can be leveraged to advance progress toward targets. Such part-nerships and collaborative efforts will be key in pooling resources and knowledge assets into collective action and taking advantage of opportunities in the region to advance the continental transformation. These include as-sets from nonstate actors in particular. Efforts should be made to mobilize CSOs, the pri-vate sector, and policy think tanks for mutual benefit.
Intraregional cooperation and partnerships will also be important for discovering in-novations, promoting continental learning, and finding practical solutions. Particular emphasis will be placed on exploring ways to unlock and put to use existing African expertise. In addition, capacities should be strengthened to facilitate South-South Cooperation to build social and economic capital. Its modalities present new op-portunities and development solutions, including financing, knowledge-sharing, capacity substitution or augmentation, ac-cess to markets, transfer of technology and innovation, and engagement with the do-mestic private sector.
Proposal 11: Engender ownership by countries and a broad spectrum of Africans
One of the major challenges for Agenda 2063 is that implementation will depend on Member States; they have the ultimate responsibility for making it happen. A critical factor for success is therefore the urgency and extent to which Member States take ownership of the Agenda through national policies, integrating projects and other interventions consistently into plans, and mainstreaming priorities in fiscal budgets. Member States also need to build human, institutional, and operational capacity as part of domesticating Agenda 2063.
To support domestication and strengthen capacities, the AU will assist Member States in preparing “National Agenda 2063” documents. These will internalize the aspirations and integrate the key elements of programs and projects into national plans. Their preparation will engender greater ownership and commitment by Member States. Such documents will capture the spirit and provisions of Agenda 2063 documents, including parts of the first 10-year plan and a summary reflection of the countries’ own priorities (based on their development plans or vision documents). In a pilot, a few countries will be assisted in preparing these documents. As part of the pilot, domestication tool kits also will be prepared and training sessions organized for other countries. The Agenda 2063 CDP will also be domesticated.
Proposal 12: Unconditionally emphasize self-financing: “Solving the solvable — Africa financing itself”
Africa cannot and should not expect donors to fund Agenda 2063. External funding of any kind always comes with subtle conditions that
16
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
can be intrusive and disruptive and has creat-ed a dependency syndrome that is now hard to escape. Continued reliance on external funding will undermine ownership and lead to a loss of control of the Agenda. Another critical success factor is therefore how much the continent’s leaders can commit to and mo-bilize Africa’s own funding for Agenda 2063. The AU and Member States must urgently use its own resources, internally generated or otherwise, to find new ways of financing. Several options are under discussion and once selected must be introduced without delay. Mechanisms will also be developed for tap-ping into resources from the global South.
Proposal 13: Enhance capacity for implementation and for monitoring and evaluation
Agenda 2063 emphasizes invest-ment in capacities for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) to promote an evaluative culture that goes beyond compliance with processes and funding requirements. Con-crete implementation modalities and M&E capacity requirements should be factored into all Agenda 2063 project interventions, with plans for upgrading skills, managing information, strengthening collection of socioeconomic data, and developing systems for reporting results. Interventions should aim to improve procedures, set up accountability mechanisms, and create functional mech-anisms that facilitate access to and use of information for decisions.
An evaluative culture suggests use of M&E as a basis for learning to promote better perfor-mance, integrally linking M&E with knowledge management. For this purpose, Agenda 2063’s M&E framework will serve as a foundation for strengthening the capacity of Member States’ governments and their institutions to help them learn from their implementation experience and
improve their performance, drawing on evi-dence on the ground.
Proposal 14: Strengthen the implementation capacity of key institutions
CD priorities should include institutional development and mechanisms for delivering development services across the continent, as well as making the continent’s institutions — AUC, RECs, NEPAD Agency, African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), Pan-African Parliament (PAP), and so on — operationally more effective and efficient.2 Continental and regional programs need to be linked to na-tional actions, each providing feedback to the other, which is why mechanisms to facilitate interaction will be important.
Proposal 15: Anchor to the Capacity Development Strategic Framework
The AU/NEPAD Capacity Development Strategic Framework (CDSF), endorsed by the AU Assembly in 2010, provides a good foundation for prioritizing CD in Africa. The CDSF represents a crucial paradigm shift in the approach to CD, emphasizing the imperative to capitalize on African resource-fulness and seeking to address capacity challenges through innovative and transfor-mative processes. The CDSF is a common approach to CD, ensuring continuity and synergy between regional and nation-al initiatives. Based on priorities defined by African stakeholders, the CDSF is found-ed on six “cornerstones:” transformative leadership; citizen empowerment; utilizing African potential, skills, and resources; pursuing knowledge and evidence-based innovation; developing the capacity of ca-pacity developers; and integrating planning and implementation for results.3
17
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
The cornerstones address capacities among systems and individuals, and this Capacity Development Plan Framework builds on and operationalizes them. The aim is both to de-velop the capacity of actors (organizations and individuals) who can bring about transforma-tion and to meet Agenda 2063’s aspirations.
Proposal 16: Recognize and accept what constitutes the multifaceted importance of a CDP
When one reads the initial CD interventions suggested in the following chapters, one should bear in mind that CD includes:
• Training people and developing skills.
• Improving enablers, optimizers, and ca-pacity enhancers.
• Implementing enabling processes, in-stitutional structures, and managerial systems, including decentralization and responsibilization.
• Mobilizing and building commitment at all levels to succeed in a strategic and vision-ary agenda.
• Identifying and promoting soft skills.
With the above 16 proposals in mind, the Capacity Team presents some initial CD interventions, using a broad range of entry points.
18
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
3PROPOSED CONTINENTAL
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
This first CDP matrix (table 3.1) proposes continental start-up capacity interventions. The areas of intervention will not remain static and will need to be periodically updated within the first 10 years when new priorities emerge. Further, these areas are only indica-tive of some of the foundational interventions required. The outcomes of the interventions
will be the basis for identifying, updating, or expanding further interventions.
The table has six key issue areas (first row), plus the timeline, indicative costs, and pro-posed key supporting organizations. The areas of broad capacity gaps and needs derive from the capacity needs assessment.
19
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLANTa
ble
3.1
Co
nti
nen
tal s
tart
-up
cap
acit
y in
terv
enti
on
s
No.
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts (
$)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
1C
ore
impl
emen
tatio
n ar
rang
emen
t/m
echa
nism
Nee
d to
est
ablis
h ro
bust
impl
emen
tatio
n en
tity/
foca
l tea
ms
Urg
ently
cre
ate
and
prov
ide
expe
rt ca
paci
ty tr
aini
ng to
the
Age
nda
2063
impl
emen
tatio
n en
tity/
foca
l tea
ms s
et u
p un
der
the A
UC
and
oth
er le
vels
/in
stitu
tions
as a
ppro
pria
te
Urg
ent
Dev
elop
and
impl
emen
t a
know
n an
d pu
blic
ized
fo
cal e
ntity
with
A
gend
a 20
63 e
mai
l and
co
mm
unic
atio
n sy
stem
sC
larit
y in
resp
onsi
bilit
y fo
r mov
ing
the A
gend
a fo
rwar
dR
esou
rces
and
syst
ems
prec
edin
g an
d fo
llow
ing
the
impl
emen
tatio
n
Cos
t of e
quip
men
t, IT
, ad
min
istra
tive,
and
co
mm
unic
atio
n se
rvic
es
($10
0,00
0)C
osts
rela
ted
to
deve
lopm
ent/f
orm
ulat
ion
of th
e TO
R, i
nclu
ding
th
e en
tity’
s man
date
and
ro
les (
$50,
000)
Cos
t of r
esul
ts-b
ased
im
plem
enta
tion
train
ing
wor
ksho
ps (t
rave
l and
lo
gist
ics)
($15
0,00
0)
$300
,000
AU
CA
CB
FEC
AA
fDB
2A
gend
a to
tra
nsfo
rm
Afr
ican
min
d-se
t
Urg
ently
put
in p
lace
ne
w in
itiat
ives
to
desi
gn, p
rom
ote,
and
ac
hiev
e a
min
d-se
t tra
nsfo
rmat
ion
wel
l id
eolo
gize
d an
d pr
omot
ed a
t all
leve
ls
Qui
ckly
dev
elop
and
agr
ee o
n an
Afr
ican
exi
sten
tial i
deol
ogy,
a
stra
tegi
c va
lue
syst
em, a
nd a
co
ncep
t of P
an-A
fric
anis
m th
at
trans
cend
s cul
ture
s, tra
ditio
ns,
and
phys
ical
bou
ndar
ies
Org
aniz
e a
serie
s of m
ind-
set
trans
form
atio
n pi
lot s
emin
ars
acro
ss th
e co
ntin
ent i
nvol
ving
ke
y st
akeh
olde
rsU
se p
opul
ar c
ultu
re to
co
nsci
entiz
e ci
tizen
s
Urg
ent
Ideo
logi
cal g
roun
ding
on
Pan-
Afr
ican
solid
arity
, co
nfide
nce,
and
self-
awar
enes
s and
ow
ners
hip
of it
s ow
n A
fric
an
deve
lopm
ent a
gend
aA
fric
a to
mas
ter i
ts o
wn
dest
iny
thro
ugh
the
effo
rts a
nd p
roce
sses
dr
iven
and
man
aged
by
its o
wn
citiz
ens
Cre
ate
a m
ovem
ent f
or
com
mun
icat
ing
and
publ
iciz
ing
Age
nda
2063
Min
d-se
t tra
nsfo
rmat
ion
expe
rt-te
am o
rient
atio
ns
($20
0,00
0)C
onsu
ltativ
e pr
oces
s ac
ross
the
cont
inen
t on
dev
elop
ing
Afr
ican
ex
iste
ntia
l ide
olog
y an
d st
rate
gic
valu
e sy
stem
s ($
900,
000)
Cos
ts re
late
d to
or
gani
zing
the
min
d-se
t se
min
ars (
Afr
ica
min
d-se
t pr
opag
anda
pac
kage
s —
trans
port,
logi
stic
s, an
d fin
anci
al re
sour
ces)
($
400,
000)
$1,5
00,0
00A
UC
with
su
ppor
t of
NEP
AD
AC
BF
ECA
AfD
BU
ND
P A
fric
a B
urea
u
3Su
stai
ning
the
Age
nda
2063
vi
sion
Put i
n pl
ace
mec
hani
sms t
hat
can
help
ens
ure
the
sust
aina
bilit
y of
“Th
e A
fric
a W
e W
ant”
vi
sion
, par
ticul
arly
am
ong
Afr
ica’
s po
litic
al le
ader
ship
an
d th
e le
ader
s of k
ey
inst
itutio
ns
Iden
tify
and
build
a sm
all
team
of c
ham
pion
cur
rent
and
fo
rmer
Hea
ds o
f Sta
te fo
r “Th
e A
fric
a W
e W
ant”
vis
ion
Con
side
r rev
isin
g/ex
pand
ing
the
role
of t
he N
EPA
D
HG
SOC
to se
rve
as a
form
al
Hea
ds o
f Sta
te A
ssem
bly
for
stim
ulat
ing
and
guid
ing
the
visi
on
Urg
ent
Hig
h-le
vel A
gend
a 20
63
cham
pion
sA
civ
il so
ciet
y an
d yo
uth-
led
mov
emen
t of
peop
le th
at p
rom
otes
and
sa
fegu
ards
the
visi
onA
stro
ng a
nd su
stai
ned
Age
nda
2063
team
Team
com
posi
tion,
se
nsiti
zing
mis
sion
s, ro
undt
able
/hig
h-le
vel
mee
tings
, tra
vel a
nd
logi
stic
al c
osts
, and
som
e ho
nora
rium
cos
ts fo
r fo
rmer
Hea
ds o
f Sta
te
($1,
000,
000)
$1,0
00,0
00A
UC
with
su
ppor
t of
NEP
AD
ECA (c
ontin
ued)
20
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No.
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts (
$)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
4In
stitu
tiona
l ca
paci
tyR
atio
naliz
atio
n of
the
curr
ent c
ontin
enta
l in
stitu
tiona
l ar
chite
ctur
e
Ref
orm
inst
itutio
ns to
mak
e th
em A
gend
a 20
63 c
ompl
iant
Bui
ld c
apac
ity th
roug
h th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f an
AU
in
ter-i
nstit
utio
nal t
ask
forc
e,
with
one
or t
wo
key
pers
ons
from
eac
h or
gani
zatio
n (A
UC
, NEP
AD
, APR
M, P
AP,
R
ECs a
nd so
me
orga
ns) t
o m
ake
reco
mm
enda
tions
for
ratio
naliz
ing
Form
ulat
e a
guid
ed w
ork
prog
ram
Trai
n ex
perts
in th
e ra
tiona
lizat
ion
Urg
ent
(firs
t ye
ar)
Trai
n ke
y in
divi
dual
s fr
om e
ach
inst
itutio
n on
ratio
naliz
atio
n fo
r A
gend
a 20
63Es
tabl
ish
a re
alis
tic
inst
itutio
nal r
efor
m
agen
da to
mak
e th
e co
ntin
enta
l ins
titut
ion
mor
e fit
for p
urpo
se fo
r A
gend
a 20
63
Proc
urem
ent o
f a
cons
ulta
nt (d
evel
opm
ent
of T
OR
for t
his t
ask
forc
e) ($
200,
000)
Expe
rt-su
ppor
ted
wor
k se
ssio
ns ($
100,
000)
$300
,000
AU
C w
ith
supp
ort o
f N
EPA
D
ECA
AC
BF
AfD
B
Set u
p an
inst
itutio
nal r
efor
m
polic
y gr
oup
to b
uild
an
impl
emen
tatio
n fr
amew
ork
for
Age
nda
2063
Firs
t 6
mon
ths
Dis
tingu
ish
role
s and
re
spon
sibi
litie
s of e
ach
orga
niza
tion
at th
e co
ntin
enta
l lev
el
Expe
nses
for t
he
inst
itutio
nal r
efor
m
polic
y gr
oup
($20
0,00
0)
$200
,000
AU
C w
ith
supp
ort o
f N
EPA
D
TBD
Impl
emen
tatio
n pr
oces
ses a
nd re
sults
-dr
iven
app
roac
hes
Cre
ate
and
train
spec
ial
impl
emen
tatio
n br
igad
e un
its a
s par
t of c
ontin
enta
l in
stitu
tions
Firs
t 6
mon
ths
Prod
uce
an
impl
emen
tatio
n m
anua
l ta
ilore
d to
eac
h in
stitu
tion
Plac
e re
new
ed fo
cus
on im
plem
enta
tion
for
resu
lts
Dev
elop
men
t of t
he T
OR
of
brig
ade
units
(rol
es
and
func
tions
) ($7
0,00
0)O
pera
tiona
l gui
delin
e pr
oduc
tion,
a c
oord
inat
ed
track
ing
syst
em, a
nd
train
ing
wor
ksho
ps o
n im
plem
enta
tion
proc
esse
s ($
50,0
00)
$120
,000
NEP
AD
A
genc
y an
d PA
P
TBD
Gov
erna
nce
and
enfo
rcem
ent
capa
citie
s
Inst
itute
and
org
aniz
e a
runn
ing
syst
em o
f gov
erna
nce
of A
U p
roce
ss w
orks
hops
th
at p
rece
de e
very
stat
utor
y pl
anne
d m
eetin
g.Id
entif
y bo
ttlen
ecks
and
en
hanc
e re
sults
-driv
en
gove
rnan
ce a
ppro
ache
s
Firs
t yea
rB
ette
r foc
us a
nd d
rive
for r
esul
ts a
nd th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of
deci
sion
sR
educ
e co
sts f
rom
fo
cusi
ng o
n th
e pr
oces
ses
of m
eetin
gs
Hig
h-le
vel e
xper
t co
nsul
tant
s to
unde
rtake
th
e ch
ange
in th
e go
vern
ance
syst
ems
($50
,000
)C
ondu
ct tr
aini
ng
wor
ksho
ps fo
r sta
ff to
ca
rry
out t
he n
ew sy
stem
(tr
avel
and
logi
stic
al
cost
s) ($
200,
000)
$250
,000
AU
(with
su
ppor
t fro
m
PAP
and
APR
M)
TBD
Nee
d to
stre
ngth
en
the A
U a
nd re
trofit
th
e AU
Org
ans f
or
Age
nda
2063
Stre
ngth
en th
e co
nsul
tativ
e ca
paci
ty a
nd re
vam
p th
e st
rate
gic
focu
s of t
he ro
le
and
wor
k of
the
key
orga
ns,
built
aro
und
thei
r lea
ders
hip
path
way
tow
ard
“The
Afr
ica
We
Wan
t”
Firs
t yea
rV
isio
nary
and
tra
nsfo
rmat
ive
lead
ersh
ip
thro
ugh
the
wor
k of
th
e or
gans
tow
ard
“The
A
fric
a W
e W
ant”
Con
tent
des
ign,
co
nsul
tativ
e pr
oces
ses,
prep
arat
ion
of p
ropo
sals
, an
d fa
cilit
atio
n of
im
plem
enta
tion
($40
0,00
0)
$400
,000
AU
(with
su
ppor
t fro
m
PAP
and
APR
M)
Tab
le 3
.1 C
on
tin
enta
l sta
rt-u
p c
apac
ity
inte
rven
tio
ns
(con
tinue
d)
21
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No.
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts (
$)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
5H
uman
cap
acity
(h
ard
and
soft
skill
s)
Insu
ffici
ent s
taff
with
th
e rig
ht sk
ills i
n th
e in
stitu
tions
Ana
lyze
cur
rent
skill
sets
and
im
porta
nt sk
ills r
equi
red
for
Age
nda
2063
Und
erta
ke a
cap
acity
-ena
blin
g re
desi
gn o
f fun
ctio
nsEm
bark
on
a re
crui
tmen
t driv
e,
hirin
g pe
ople
with
skill
s at
mul
tiple
leve
ls
Firs
t yea
rQ
ualifi
ed P
an-A
fric
anis
ts
who
hav
e un
derg
one
rigor
ous i
nduc
tion
and
cons
cien
tizat
ion
train
ing
prog
ram
s
Ana
lysi
s of n
ew sk
ill se
t ($
50,0
00)
Trai
ning
pac
kage
and
tra
inin
g pr
ogra
ms
($15
0,00
0)
$200
,000
AU
CTB
D
Skill
s ret
entio
n an
d ut
iliza
tion
syst
emW
ork
on a
ppro
ache
s for
en
gagi
ng a
nd u
sing
the
serv
ices
of t
he A
fric
an
dias
pora
with
rele
vant
te
chni
cal s
kills
Firs
t 2
year
sC
reat
e sh
ort-t
erm
sk
ills t
rans
fer f
or th
e A
fric
an d
iasp
ora
to w
ork
tem
pora
rily
in A
fric
aSk
ills-
base
d ne
twor
k of
th
e di
aspo
ra tr
ansf
errin
g sk
ills t
o A
fric
a
Expe
rt co
nsul
tant
to
unde
rtake
the
desi
gn
and
train
ing
wor
ksho
ps
on im
plem
entin
g ne
w
appr
oach
es($
100,
000)
Cos
ts re
late
d to
setti
ng u
p th
e ne
twor
k(1
50,0
00)
$250
,000
AU
CC
ontin
enta
l in
stitu
tions
Gre
ater
app
licat
ion
of
the
soft
skill
s in
the
cont
inen
tal i
nstit
utio
ns
Form
ulat
e an
d im
plem
ent a
so
ft sk
ills n
ew tr
aini
ng a
gend
a.
This
cou
ld in
volv
e w
orks
hops
an
d se
min
ars f
or le
ader
s and
m
anag
ers a
t the
con
tinen
tal
leve
l
Firs
t 2
year
sC
ompr
ehen
sive
indi
cativ
e lis
ts o
f sof
t ski
llsA
focu
s on
soft
skill
s dur
ing
revi
ew,
asse
ssm
ent,
eval
uatio
n,
and
hum
an re
sour
ce
train
ing
Trai
ning
on
the
appl
icat
ion
of so
ft sk
ills
($15
0,00
0)
$150
,000
AU
CA
ll co
ntin
enta
l in
stitu
tions
6Sy
stem
s and
w
ork
proc
esse
sFo
cus o
n re
sults
-bas
ed
man
agem
ent
Set u
p an
exp
ert t
eam
to
unde
rtake
a si
gnifi
cant
ov
erha
ul a
nd st
ream
line,
with
gr
eate
r dec
entra
lizat
ion
of
resp
onsi
bilit
ies,
the
wor
king
sy
stem
s and
pro
cess
es o
f co
ntin
enta
l ins
titut
ions
Firs
t yea
rA
syst
em o
f cle
arly
de
fined
mea
sure
s of
perf
orm
ance
and
succ
ess
Purp
ose-
driv
en
cont
inen
tal i
nstit
utio
ns
Proc
ess a
nd e
stab
lish
perf
orm
ance
man
agem
ent
syst
ems (
$100
,000
)W
orks
hops
on
rele
vanc
e, e
ffici
ency
, or
gani
zatio
nal
effe
ctiv
enes
s, , a
nd fi
t for
pu
rpos
e ($
100,
000)
$200
,000
AU
CTB
D
M&
E, w
ith a
focu
s on
effe
ctiv
e an
d ef
ficie
nt in
stitu
tiona
l pr
oced
ures
, ca
pabi
litie
s, an
d in
tern
al sy
stem
s
Cre
ate
a ta
sk fo
rce
in e
ach
cont
inen
tal i
nstit
utio
n to
as
sess
exi
stin
g da
ta re
sour
ces
and
iden
tify
data
gap
s with
re
spec
t to
the
indi
cato
rs
for t
rack
ing
Age
nda
2063
pr
ogre
ss (b
asel
ine,
impa
ct, a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n ou
tcom
es)
Firs
t 2
year
sA
pro
cess
of
impl
emen
tatio
n of
re
sults
-bas
ed M
&E
tool
s in
con
tinen
tal i
nstit
utio
ns
Inst
itutio
naliz
e M
&E
syst
em w
ith p
erfo
rman
ce-
repo
rt m
echa
nism
s in
plac
e, in
clud
ing
the
train
ing
of in
divi
dual
s in
resu
lts-b
ased
M&
E ($
100,
000)
$100
,000
AU
CTB
D
Effe
ctiv
e an
d ef
ficie
nt p
roce
dure
s, ca
pabi
litie
s, an
d in
tern
al sy
stem
s
Und
erta
ke a
cap
acity
-en
hanc
ing
reen
gine
erin
g of
sy
stem
s and
pro
cedu
res
Firs
t yea
rU
pgra
de sy
stem
s and
w
ork
proc
esse
sEx
pert
revi
ew o
f the
cu
rren
t sys
tem
with
a
view
to u
pgra
ding
it
($15
0,00
0)
$150
,000
AU
CA
CB
FEC
A (con
tinue
d)
22
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No.
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts (
$)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
7K
now
ledg
e an
d ac
cess
to
info
rmat
ion
Exch
ange
and
shar
e in
form
atio
n, in
tern
ally
an
d ex
tern
ally
Iden
tify
and
prov
ide
lear
ning
re
sour
ces a
nd c
arry
out
ta
rget
ed tr
aini
ng fo
r key
co
ntin
enta
l ins
titut
ions
to
chan
ge th
e cu
lture
of w
orki
ng
in si
los
Firs
t yea
rB
uild
kno
wle
dge
and
info
rmat
ion
man
agem
ent
syst
ems i
n ea
ch
orga
niza
tion
that
will
be
com
e its
org
aniz
atio
nal
cultu
re
Initi
al o
utso
urci
ng
and
man
agem
ent c
osts
($
50,0
00)
Trai
ning
cos
ts($
200,
000)
$250
,000
AU
CA
CB
FEC
A
Mec
hani
sms i
n pl
ace
for o
rgan
izat
ions
to
be
“lea
rnin
g or
gani
zatio
ns”
for
Age
nda
2063
Rat
iona
lize
all t
he d
atab
ase
and
know
ledg
e sy
stem
s in
cont
inen
tal i
nstit
utio
ns w
ith
the
aim
of i
nstit
utin
g a
cultu
re
of le
arni
ng a
t ind
ivid
ual a
nd
orga
niza
tiona
l lev
els
Firs
t yea
rD
atab
ase,
stru
ctur
ed
docu
men
tatio
n, a
nd
know
ledg
e sy
stem
Expe
rt co
nsul
tant
to
unde
rtake
ratio
naliz
atio
n ($
200,
000)
$200
,000
AU
CA
CB
FEC
A
8C
hang
e an
d tra
nsfo
rmat
ive
capa
citie
s
Tran
sfor
mat
iona
l cu
lture
Top
lead
ersh
ip
and
man
agem
ent
optim
ism
, and
top
man
agem
ent
owne
rshi
p of
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g
Und
erta
ke a
con
tinen
t-wid
e se
ries o
f tra
inin
g, e
xper
ts’
advi
ce, a
nd re
com
men
datio
ns
on tr
ansf
orm
ativ
e cu
lture
and
ga
me-
chan
ging
lead
ersh
ipPr
oduc
e a
year
ly p
ublic
atio
n ra
nkin
g th
e hi
gher
-leve
l tra
nsfo
rmat
ive
and
acco
unta
ble
lead
ersh
ip o
n th
e co
ntin
ent
Firs
t yea
rA
rene
wed
Afr
ica
with
an
inte
rnal
ized
and
de
term
ined
spiri
t of
trans
form
atio
nal c
ultu
reA
n A
fric
an le
ader
ship
th
at e
mbr
aces
Afr
ican
va
lue
syst
ems o
f uni
ty,
sacr
ifice
, and
the
inte
rest
of
the
com
mon
goo
dA
n A
fric
an le
ader
ship
th
at is
com
petit
ive
at a
ll le
vels
and
at a
ll tim
es
Expe
rts’ r
emun
erat
ion
($50
0,00
0)R
esea
rch
and
publ
icat
ion
cost
s ($5
00,0
00)
$100
,000
AU
CA
U a
genc
ies
All
stak
ehol
ders
Spiri
t of P
an-
Afr
ican
ism
Fast
-trac
k pe
ople
-to-p
eopl
e in
tegr
atio
n pr
oces
ses
(cou
ntrie
s do
not p
rodu
ce
inte
grat
ion;
peo
ple
do)
Pan-
Afr
ican
ist e
xper
ts to
pr
oduc
e an
d de
velo
p an
in
duct
ion
stra
tegy
for t
he st
aff
in c
ontin
enta
l org
aniz
atio
ns
and
carr
y ou
t tra
inin
g to
in
culc
ate
a Pa
n-A
fric
an sp
irit
Firs
t yea
rPe
ople
mot
ivat
ed to
war
d a
shar
ed in
spira
tiona
l vi
sion
Prod
uctio
n of
an
indu
ctio
n st
rate
gy o
n Pa
n-A
fric
anis
m
Org
aniz
e an
d co
nduc
t a
serie
s of w
orks
hops
on
Pan
-Afr
ican
ism
($
450,
000)
Pan-
Afr
ican
ist e
xper
ts’
rem
uner
atio
n ($
50,0
00)
$500
,000
AU
CTB
D
Cha
nge
read
ines
s at
titud
esD
evel
op a
pla
tform
to
enco
urag
e an
d re
war
d cr
eativ
ity, i
nnov
atio
n, a
nd
entre
pren
eurs
hip
Firs
t yea
rA
cul
ture
of s
elf-
driv
en
chan
geR
enew
ed a
nd
trans
form
ed a
ppro
ach
to w
ork,
pro
gram
s, an
d pr
ojec
ts
Set u
p th
e pl
atfo
rm w
ith a
re
war
d fu
nd ($
450,
000)
$450
,000
AU
CTB
D
Tab
le 3
.1 C
on
tin
enta
l sta
rt-u
p c
apac
ity
inte
rven
tio
ns
(con
tinue
d)
23
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No.
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts (
$)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
9C
ompo
site
ca
paci
ties
Stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ngFa
cilit
atio
n an
d co
ordi
natio
nPr
ogra
m d
evel
opm
ent
Man
agem
ent a
nd
finan
cing
kno
wle
dge
Ris
k m
anag
emen
t
Des
ign
and
inst
itute
a
Com
posi
te C
apac
ities
R
efre
sher
Tra
inin
g Sc
hem
e th
at ta
ckle
s the
key
are
as o
f op
erat
iona
lizat
ion;
pro
gram
m
anag
emen
t; an
d fa
cilit
atio
n,
coor
dina
tion,
and
stra
tegi
c/vi
sion
ary
plan
ning
Firs
t yea
rR
elev
ant A
fric
an
inst
itutio
ns p
rovi
ding
co
ntin
uous
relia
ble,
ef
ficie
nt, a
nd e
ffect
ive
serv
ices
to it
s ow
n ci
tizen
an
d to
the
wor
ldA
cro
p of
lead
ers i
n A
fric
an in
stitu
tions
with
fo
rwar
d-lo
okin
g vi
sion
/th
inki
ng a
nd p
lann
ing
to
deliv
er o
n A
gend
a 20
63
and
beyo
nd
Expe
rts to
dev
elop
cle
ar
TOR
on
coor
dina
tion
and
faci
litat
ion
($50
,000
)Ex
perts
to d
evel
op
capa
citie
s to
mat
ch th
e TO
R, t
o ge
t the
righ
t pe
ople
with
the
right
m
ind-
sets
, and
to fr
ame
an a
gend
a fo
r com
posi
te-
skill
s mas
tery
and
ap
plic
atio
n pf
the
task
($
50,0
00)
$100
,000
AU
CTa
rget
ed
indi
vidu
als
and
inst
itutio
ns
acro
ss a
ll se
ctor
s
10Fi
nanc
e an
d re
sour
ces
DR
MC
reat
e an
d tra
in a
smal
l and
fo
cuse
d D
RM
brig
ade
unit
as p
art o
f the
par
tner
ship
and
re
sour
ce-m
obili
zatio
n se
ctio
n of
eac
h co
ntin
enta
l ins
titut
ion
Bui
ld c
apac
ities
that
hel
p A
fric
a tra
nsiti
on fr
om th
e pa
rado
x of
bei
ng a
reso
urce
-ric
h co
ntin
ent w
ith a
hig
h nu
mbe
r of p
oor i
ndiv
idua
ls
Firs
t yea
rD
evel
op a
con
tinen
tal
DR
M fr
amew
ork
The
cont
inen
t enj
oyin
g its
reso
urce
sJo
int D
RM
secr
etar
iat
with
AfD
B fo
r Age
nda
2063
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
g th
roug
h tra
inin
g w
orks
hops
($25
0,00
0)
$250
,000
AU
CA
fDB
AC
BF
11A
ntic
ipat
ive
read
ing
of
the
futu
re
and
scen
ario
bu
ildin
g
Con
duct
futu
re
anal
ysis
and
scen
ario
pl
anni
ngIn
volv
e no
nsta
te
acto
rs to
con
tribu
te to
pr
oces
ses o
f sce
nario
pl
anni
ngIn
clud
e yo
uth
and
wom
en
Bui
ld c
apac
ity th
roug
h tra
inin
g an
d w
orks
hops
on
futu
re
anal
ysis
and
scen
ario
pla
nnin
g
Firs
t 6
mon
ths
Afr
ican
forw
ard-
look
ing
lead
ers/
indi
vidu
als
envi
sion
ing,
ana
lyzi
ng,
and
plan
ning
the
futu
re o
f th
e co
ntin
ent
Dev
elop
and
del
iver
the
cont
ent o
f gro
up-tr
aini
ng
sess
ions
($20
0,00
0)
$200
,000
NEP
AD
A
genc
yTB
D (con
tinue
d)
24
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No.
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts (
$)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
Prop
osed
CD
P ap
proa
ches
to a
ddre
ss o
ther
cap
acity
nee
ds
12N
eed
to e
nhan
ce
som
e cr
itica
l um
brel
la
capa
citie
s for
A
fric
a as
a
cont
inen
t
Cap
acity
for e
nsur
ing
and
prot
ectin
g co
ntin
enta
l sec
urity
Cre
ate
and
oper
atio
naliz
e an
AU
Con
tinen
tal S
ecur
ity
Wat
chdo
g In
stitu
tion
to
iden
tify
and
act o
n ex
istin
g an
d fu
ture
secu
rity
thre
ats
The
cont
inen
t’s a
bilit
y to
pr
ojec
t pow
er a
nd a
utho
rity
Firs
t 2
year
sA
Con
tinen
tal
Inte
llige
nce A
genc
y (C
IA) t
o id
entif
y cu
rren
t an
d fu
ture
secu
rity
thre
ats
Cos
ts re
late
d to
setti
ng u
p th
e ag
ency
($60
0,00
0)$6
00,0
00A
U P
eace
an
d Se
curit
y C
ounc
il
AC
BF
ECA
13Im
prov
e ca
paci
ty
for a
chie
ving
an
d en
surin
g tru
e ow
ners
hip
of A
fric
an
natu
ral r
esou
rces
and
fu
nds
Dev
elop
a ti
me-
boun
d st
rate
gy
for A
fric
a’s m
anag
emen
t of i
ts
reso
urce
s and
fund
sQ
uick
ly se
t up
and
oper
atio
naliz
e an
Afr
ican
M
iner
al D
evel
opm
ent C
ente
r (A
MD
C)
Iden
tify
and
cons
olid
ate
enfo
rcem
ent m
echa
nism
s, in
clud
ing
train
ing,
co
mm
unic
atio
n, a
nd
cont
inuo
us fa
mili
ariz
ing,
Firs
t yea
rO
wne
rshi
p of
our
age
nda
Gre
ater
ava
ilabi
lity
and
the
mor
e tim
ely
use
of
Afr
ica’
s res
ourc
es fo
r our
pr
iorit
ies
Dev
elop
stra
tegy
($
50,0
00)
Cos
ts re
late
d to
setti
ng
up a
n op
erat
ing
AM
DC
($
250,
000)
Res
ourc
es fo
r exp
erts
to
con
duct
a st
udy
and
to d
esig
n en
forc
emen
t m
echa
nism
s and
trai
ning
($
150,
000)
$450
,000
AU
CTB
D
14C
apac
ity fo
r ach
ievi
ng
mon
itorin
g of
A
fric
a’s r
esou
rces
via
ou
ter s
pace
sate
llite
te
chno
logy
Con
stitu
te, o
rient
, and
trai
n an
Afr
ican
hig
h-le
vel t
eam
to
neg
otia
te u
rgen
tly n
eede
d sp
ace
for p
ositi
onin
g A
fric
a’s
own
mon
itorin
g sa
telli
teId
entif
y an
d or
ient
a te
am o
f A
fric
an e
xper
ts o
n sa
telli
te
tech
nolo
gy to
ens
ure
sust
aine
d at
tent
ion
and
subs
tant
ive
info
rmat
ion
Firs
t yea
rA
fric
a us
ing
its o
wn
spac
e sa
telli
te te
chno
logy
to
col
lect
and
ana
lyze
in
form
atio
n on
its
reso
urce
s
Expe
nses
for c
onst
itutin
g an
d tra
inin
g th
e hi
gh-
leve
l tea
m ($
100,
000)
Iden
tifica
tion
and
orie
ntat
ion
of th
e ex
pert
team
($20
0,00
0)
$300
,000
AO
STI
TBD
Tab
le 3
.1 C
on
tin
enta
l sta
rt-u
p c
apac
ity
inte
rven
tio
ns
(con
tinue
d)
25
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No.
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts (
$)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
15C
apac
ity fo
r sa
fegu
ardi
ng
and
usin
g its
ow
n re
sour
ces
for i
nitia
tives
, de
velo
pmen
t ac
tiviti
es, a
nd it
s in
terg
over
nmen
tal
inst
itutio
ns
Dev
elop
an
inte
rnal
Afr
ican
pr
otoc
ol th
at id
entifi
es a
nd
limits
the
kind
s of f
undi
ng
that
Afr
ican
cou
ntrie
s and
in
stitu
tions
shou
ld so
licit
from
ou
tsid
e th
e co
ntin
ent
Iden
tify
and
resp
onsi
biliz
e an
in
stitu
tion
that
will
lead
the
wor
k on
illic
it fin
anci
al fl
ows
from
the
cont
inen
tD
evel
op a
nd n
egot
iate
a
prot
ocol
with
Afr
ica’
s priv
ate
sect
or le
ader
s for
gre
ater
su
ppor
t fro
m p
rivat
e se
ctor
re
sour
ces t
o he
lp th
e co
ntin
ent
esca
pe a
id o
verd
epen
denc
y
Firs
t yea
rA
ltern
ate
fund
ing
mod
els
for t
he c
ontin
ent
Self-
sust
aini
ng c
ontin
ent
Dev
elop
an
inte
rnal
pr
otoc
ol ($
50,0
00)
Iden
tify
and
resp
onsi
biliz
e In
stitu
tions
($
250,
000)
Dev
elop
and
neg
otia
te a
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
pro
toco
l ($
100,
000)
$400
,000
NEP
AD
with
su
ppor
t of
AU
C
REC
s
16C
apac
ity fo
r ful
l ow
ners
hip
and
man
agem
ent o
f its
cu
rren
cy a
rran
gem
ents
to
serv
e Afr
ica’
s in
tere
sts
Des
ign
a st
rate
gic
proc
ess f
or
Mem
ber S
tate
s to
enha
nce
owne
rshi
p of
thei
r ow
n cu
rren
cy. C
ould
be
linke
d to
th
e w
ork
of th
e Afr
ican
Cen
tral
Ban
kLe
ader
ship
of t
he A
fric
an
Mon
etar
y Fu
nd to
pre
pare
the
prop
osal
and
the
proc
ess f
or
an o
vera
ll A
fric
an c
ontin
enta
l st
rate
gic
appr
oach
to c
urre
ncy
owne
rshi
p an
d m
anag
emen
t
Firs
t yea
rM
embe
r Sta
tes’
sove
reig
nty
and
use
of
thei
r ow
n cu
rren
cy fo
r an
d ac
cord
ing
to th
eir
own
agen
da a
nd th
e co
ntin
ent’s
Dev
elop
men
t and
ne
gotia
tion
of a
st
rate
gic
plan
that
seek
s to
asc
erta
in A
fric
a’s
owne
rshi
p of
its o
wn
curr
ency
($12
0,00
0)
$120
,000
AU
C w
ith
the
supp
ort
of N
EPA
D
Age
ncy
REC
s
17C
apac
ity to
ens
ure
and
cont
inuo
usly
un
derta
ke, w
ith o
ne
voic
e, st
rate
gic
and
tact
ical
neg
otia
tions
vi
s-à-
vis g
loba
l act
ors
Mai
nstre
am a
Com
mon
Afr
ica
Posi
tion
in a
ll pa
rtner
ship
en
gage
men
ts w
ithin
co
ntin
enta
l ins
titut
ions
Firs
t 2
year
sA
fric
a ne
gotia
ting
on
equa
l foo
ting
(win
-win
) w
ith in
tern
atio
nal
partn
ers
TBD
TBD
AU
C w
ith
supp
ort o
f th
e N
EPA
D
Age
ncy
and
PAP
REC
s (con
tinue
d)
26
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No.
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts (
$)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
18C
apac
ity o
f Afr
ica
to
gene
rate
, pre
serv
e,
and
utili
ze it
s ow
n da
ta
Des
igna
te o
ne o
f tw
o in
stitu
tions
in A
fric
a to
m
anag
e an
d pr
omot
e st
rate
gic
appr
oach
es fo
rA
fric
a’s d
ata
revo
lutio
n an
d ow
ners
hip
Bui
ld c
apac
ity in
Afr
ican
da
ta u
se, p
rodu
ctio
n, a
nd
mai
nten
ance
and
bui
ld
capa
city
in a
kno
wle
dge
man
agem
ent s
yste
m
Firs
t 6
mon
ths
Cre
ate
an o
nlin
e kn
owle
dge
porta
l to
be a
stor
ehou
se fo
r pu
blic
atio
ns, d
iscu
ssio
ns,
know
ledg
e sh
arin
g, a
nd
best
-pra
ctic
e in
form
atio
n
Iden
tifica
tion
of
inst
itutio
ns to
man
age
and
prom
ote
appr
oach
es
for d
ata
revo
lutio
n($
200,
000)
Trai
ning
on
Afr
ican
da
ta p
rodu
ctio
n, u
se
and
mai
nten
ance
, and
kn
owle
dge
man
agem
ent
syst
em ($
300,
000)
$500
,000
AU
C w
ith
the
supp
ort
of E
CA
and
A
fDB
TBD
19St
rate
gy to
eng
age
the
Afr
ican
dia
spor
aA
scer
tain
num
ber o
f Afr
ican
s in
the
dias
pora
, the
ir sk
ills
and
expe
rtise
, and
reso
urce
s at
thei
r dis
posa
l and
det
erm
ine
how
thes
e ca
n be
use
d fo
r A
gend
a 20
63D
evel
op a
nd im
plem
ent
mec
hani
sms t
o ta
p in
to th
e A
fric
an d
iasp
ora
as a
pot
entia
l as
set t
o tra
nsfe
r bes
t pra
ctic
es
from
the
deve
lope
d w
orld
, in
clud
ing
shor
t-ter
m sk
ills
trans
fer t
hrou
gh te
mpo
rary
w
ork
on p
roje
cts
Firs
t yea
rA
stra
tegy
to e
ngag
e th
e di
aspo
ra in
im
plem
enta
tion,
not
ju
st a
dvoc
acy.
Incl
udes
ha
ving
a d
atab
ase
of th
eir
skill
s
Map
ping
the
num
ber o
f pe
ople
in th
e Afr
ican
di
aspo
ra a
nd th
eir
reso
urce
s ($1
50,0
00)
Cos
ts re
late
d to
de
velo
ping
the
stra
tegy
an
d da
taba
se ($
100,
000)
$250
,000
AU
CR
ECs
Mem
ber
Stat
esPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Civ
il so
ciet
yA
cade
mic
in
stitu
tions
Indi
cativ
e se
ed a
mou
nt re
quire
d fo
r sta
rt-up
CD
inte
rven
tions
in th
is C
DP
$9,7
90,0
00
Not
e: T
BD =
to b
e de
term
ined
.
Tab
le 3
.1 C
on
tin
enta
l sta
rt-u
p c
apac
ity
inte
rven
tio
ns
(con
tinue
d)
27
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
4PROPOSED REGIONAL CAPACITY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The second CDP matrix (table 4.1) has indic-ative examples of regional interventions. Like the continental interventions, they are not static and will need to be periodically updat-ed within the first 10 years as new priorities emerge. The interventions should be promot-ed by RECs and other regional institutions. The outcomes of the interventions will be the
basis for identifying, updating, or expanding further interventions.
The table has six key issue areas (first row), plus the timeline, indicative costs, and pro-posed key supporting organizations. The areas of broad capacity gaps and needs derive from the capacity needs assessment.
28
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Tab
le 4
.1 R
egio
nal
sta
rt-u
p c
apac
ity
inte
rven
tio
ns
No
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts
Lea
d re
spon
sibi
lity
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
1M
ind-
set
trans
form
atio
nN
eed
to p
ut in
pla
ce
new
initi
ativ
es to
de
sign
, pro
mot
e, a
nd
achi
eve
min
d-se
t tra
nsfo
rmat
ion
in th
e ea
rly y
ears
of A
gend
a 20
63
Org
aniz
e an
d de
velo
p an
ag
enda
Con
stitu
te b
rain
stor
min
g te
ams,
incl
udin
g yo
uth,
ac
adem
ia, a
nd th
ough
t lea
ders
Org
aniz
e pi
lot s
emin
ars a
cros
s re
gion
s
Urg
ent
Incr
ease
ow
ners
hip
of
Afr
ican
Age
nda
2063
Self-
awar
enes
s ide
olog
y an
d ch
ange
and
tra
nsfo
rmat
ion
read
ines
s
Reg
iona
l con
sulta
tive
proc
esse
s on
fine-
tuni
ng
acro
ss th
e re
gion
s($
300,
000)
Dev
elop
men
t of
publ
icat
ions
and
IT-
enab
led
com
mun
icat
ions
($15
0,00
0)
$450
,000
REC
sA
UC
Mem
ber
Stat
esA
CB
FO
ther
regi
onal
or
gani
zatio
ns
2U
nsyn
chro
nize
d ge
ogra
phic
co
vera
ge o
f the
R
ECs
Con
side
r hav
ing
five
REC
s ins
tead
of e
ight
, ea
ch re
pres
entin
g an
A
U re
gion
Ren
ame
REC
s to
refle
ct th
e re
gion
al fo
cus o
f the
ir ro
les
and
resp
onsi
bilit
ies i
n ov
eral
l or
gani
c AU
inst
itutio
nal
arch
itect
ure
Urg
ent
REC
s as r
espo
nsiv
e in
stitu
tions
, with
the
aim
of
cut
ting
the
num
ber o
f R
ECs
Cos
ts re
late
d to
re
stru
ctur
ing/
rena
min
g th
e R
ECs
($25
5,00
0)
$255
,000
REC
sM
embe
r St
ates
NEP
AD
AC
BF
ECA
AU
C
3R
ECs n
ot tr
uly
an in
tegr
ated
pa
rt of
the A
U
stru
ctur
e
Inte
grat
ing
REC
s int
o th
e AU
Stru
ctur
eC
reat
e an
exp
ert-s
uppo
rted
task
team
to c
onsu
lt an
d de
sign
th
e in
clus
ion
of th
e R
ECs a
s an
orga
nic
part
of th
e AU
Rei
nfor
ce e
xcha
nge
amon
g R
ECs a
nd A
U o
ffici
als t
o pr
ovid
e a
usef
ul b
asis
for
build
ing
com
mon
ality
and
for
enha
ncin
g co
ordi
natio
n on
the
deci
sion
s tak
en
Firs
t yea
rR
ECs a
s an
orga
nic
part
of th
e AU
, ser
ving
as
com
mis
sion
s of t
he A
U a
t th
e re
gion
al le
vel
Task
team
-rel
ated
cos
ts($
70,0
00)
$70,
000
REC
sTB
D
29
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts
Lea
d re
spon
sibi
lity
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
4O
rgan
izat
iona
l ca
paci
tySt
ream
linin
g/re
arra
ngem
ent o
f R
ECs f
or A
gend
a 20
63
Esta
blis
h an
Age
nda
2063
task
fo
rce
to a
lign
the
inst
itutio
nal
refo
rms f
or A
gend
a 20
63.
This
revi
ew sh
ould
con
side
r st
ream
linin
g ea
ch R
EC to
war
d th
e as
pira
tions
of A
gend
a 20
63
Firs
t yea
rTr
ain
key
indi
vidu
als
from
eac
h R
EC in
ra
tiona
lizat
ion
for
Age
nda
2063
Dev
elop
and
del
inea
te
a re
alis
tic in
stitu
tiona
l re
form
age
nda
to m
ake
the
regi
onal
inst
itutio
ns
mor
e fit
for p
urpo
se
Supp
ort f
or th
e w
ork
of
the
task
forc
e ($
100,
000)
$100
,000
REC
sTB
D
Man
agem
ent a
nd
Ope
ratio
n ca
paci
ties
Stre
ngth
en in
tern
al
man
agem
ent a
nd
acco
unta
bilit
y ar
rang
emen
tsA
ssig
n fu
nctio
nal r
oles
and
in
stitu
tiona
l res
pons
ibili
ties f
or
the
desi
gn a
nd c
oord
inat
ion
of
M&
E, c
ontin
enta
l pro
gram
s, re
sults
man
agem
ent,
qual
ity
assu
ranc
e, a
nd re
late
d is
sues
Dev
elop
and
impl
emen
t rul
es,
valu
es, n
orm
s, an
d st
anda
rds t
o go
vern
wor
k sy
stem
s
Firs
t yea
rB
ette
r fun
ctio
ning
/bet
ter
coor
dina
tion
of R
ECs
Dev
elop
self-
regu
lato
ry
man
ual
Lear
ning
and
kno
wle
dge
sem
inar
s to
train
on
impl
emen
tatio
n pr
oces
ses
($15
0,00
0)Ex
pert
cons
ulta
nt o
n pr
ojec
t man
agem
ent
($50
,000
)
$200
,000
REC
sN
EPA
DA
CB
FEC
AO
ther
co
ntin
enta
l or
gani
zatio
ns
5St
affin
g st
reng
thLi
mite
d va
ried
skill
ed
pers
onne
l in
the
regi
onal
inst
itutio
ns
Mob
ilize
Afr
ican
fina
ncia
l re
sour
ces t
o re
crui
t and
trai
n ne
w p
erso
nnel
Dev
elop
pro
files
for s
taffi
ng
func
tions
, pos
ition
s, an
d le
vels
al
igne
d di
rect
ly w
ith A
gend
a 20
63
Firs
t 2
year
sD
evel
op a
n im
prov
ed
recr
uitm
ent s
trate
gyA
naly
sis a
nd p
ropo
sals
on
the
new
skill
set
($15
0,00
0)D
evel
opm
ent o
f a
stra
tegy
and
trai
ning
for
it ($
100,
000)
$250
,000
REC
sTB
D
Effe
ct th
e so
ft sk
ills
in th
e re
gion
al
inst
itutio
ns
Dev
elop
trai
ning
wor
ksho
ps
and
sem
inar
s on
soft
skill
s at
the
regi
onal
leve
l
Firs
t yea
rC
ompr
ehen
sive
indi
cativ
e lis
ts o
f sof
t ski
llsFo
cus o
n so
ft sk
ills
durin
g hu
man
reso
urce
tra
inin
g, re
view
, as
sess
men
t, an
d ev
alua
tion
Expe
rt co
nsul
tant
to
unde
rtake
the
revi
ew
($15
0,00
0)A
pplic
atio
n of
soft
skill
s thr
ough
trai
ning
w
orks
hops
($35
0,00
0)
$500
,000
REC
sN
EPA
DA
CB
FEC
A (con
tinue
d)
30
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts
Lea
d re
spon
sibi
lity
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
6Sy
stem
s and
w
ork
proc
esse
sFo
cus o
n re
sults
-bas
ed
man
agem
ent
Und
erta
ke a
cap
acity
re
engi
neer
ing
of w
ork
syst
ems
and
proc
esse
s
Firs
t yea
rB
ette
r im
plem
enta
tion
and
achi
evem
ent o
f pr
ogra
ms
Mor
e ef
fect
ive
wor
k sy
stem
s
Kno
wle
dge
and
lear
ning
ro
undt
able
trai
ning
cos
ts
($15
0,00
0)
$150
,000
REC
sTB
D
Effe
ctiv
e an
d ef
ficie
nt
inst
itutio
nal i
nter
nal
syst
ems,
proc
edur
es,
and
capa
bilit
ies
Und
erta
ke a
cap
acity
en
hanc
ing
reen
gine
erin
g of
sy
stem
s and
pro
cedu
res
Firs
t yea
rU
pgra
de sy
stem
s and
w
ork
proc
esse
s tow
ard
Age
nda
2063
at t
he
regi
onal
leve
l
Expe
rt’s r
evie
w o
f the
cu
rren
t sys
tem
with
a
view
of u
pgra
ding
it
($25
0,00
0)
$250
,000
REC
sN
EPA
DA
CB
FEC
A
Nee
d fo
r M&
E sy
stem
Rep
eat M
&E
train
ing
focu
sed
on tr
acki
ng A
gend
a 20
63
impl
emen
tatio
n
Firs
t 2
year
sA
pro
cess
of
impl
emen
tatio
n of
resu
lt-ba
sed
M&
E to
ols a
t re
gion
al in
stitu
tions
Inst
itutio
naliz
e th
e M
&E
syst
em w
ith th
e pe
rfor
man
ce re
ports
m
echa
nism
s in
plac
e
Trai
ning
of i
ndiv
idua
ls
in re
sult-
base
d M
&E
($20
0,00
0)
$200
,000
REC
sN
EPA
DA
CB
FEC
A
7C
apac
ity g
aps
in k
now
ledg
e an
d in
form
atio
n sh
arin
g sy
stem
s
Incr
ease
/sus
tain
in
form
atio
n ex
chan
ge
betw
een
REC
s and
A
U
Kno
wle
dge
and
info
rmat
ion
syst
ems w
ith n
ew tr
aini
ng
syst
ems f
ocus
ed o
n “T
he
Afr
ica
We
Wan
t”
Urg
ent
Bui
ld k
now
ledg
e an
d in
form
atio
n m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
s in
each
or
gani
zatio
n th
at w
ill
beco
me
its o
rgan
izat
iona
l cu
lture
Out
sour
cing
and
m
anag
emen
t rel
ated
cos
ts
($15
0,00
0)
$150
,000
REC
sN
EPA
DA
CB
FEC
AA
fDB
UN
DP
Reg
iona
l B
urea
u
8Tr
ansf
orm
ativ
e an
d ga
me
chan
ging
le
ader
ship
Ensu
re tr
ansf
orm
ativ
e an
d ac
coun
tabl
e le
ader
ship
Trai
n 4–
5 ex
perts
at e
ach
REC
on
tran
sfor
mat
ive
and
gam
e-ch
angi
ng le
ader
ship
Orie
nt p
erso
nnel
of r
egio
nal
inst
itutio
ns to
be
first
and
fo
rem
ost P
an-A
fric
anis
ts
at h
eart
thro
ugh
rigor
ous
indu
ctio
n, c
onsc
ient
izat
ion,
an
d tra
inin
g pr
ogra
ms o
n va
lues
, nor
ms,
and
inte
grity
Urg
ent
Tran
sfor
m re
gion
al
com
mun
ities
, lea
ding
to
mor
e in
tegr
ated
regi
ons
Kno
wle
dge
and
lear
ning
ro
undt
able
trai
ning
se
ssio
ns ($
400,
000)
$400
,000
REC
sN
EPA
DA
CB
FEC
AA
CB
F
Tab
le 4
.1 R
egio
nal
sta
rt-u
p c
apac
ity
inte
rven
tio
ns
(con
tinue
d)
31
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts
Lea
d re
spon
sibi
lity
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
9In
effe
ctiv
e fa
cilit
atio
n an
d co
ordi
natio
n of
pr
ogra
ms a
nd
proj
ects
Nee
d fo
r an
enha
nced
fa
cilit
atio
n an
d co
ordi
natio
n of
pr
ogra
ms t
o de
liver
on
man
date
s
Und
erta
ke a
cap
acity
bui
ldin
g ac
tivity
thro
ugh
ratio
naliz
ing
coor
dina
tion
syst
ems t
o de
liver
pr
ojec
ts a
nd p
rogr
ams
Firs
t yea
rW
ell-f
unct
ioni
ng
inst
itutio
ns d
eliv
erin
g go
od se
rvic
es o
n pr
ojec
ts
and
prog
ram
s
Sem
inar
trai
ning
($20
0,00
0)$2
00,0
00R
ECs
NEP
AD
AC
BF
ECA
10R
esou
rces
an
d fin
anci
al
man
agem
ent
syst
ems
Reg
iona
l fina
nce
sour
cing
and
DR
M
mec
hani
sms
At t
he le
vel o
f eac
h re
gion
al
inst
itutio
n, c
reat
e an
d tra
in a
DR
M b
rigad
e un
it (4
–5 p
eopl
e) a
s par
t of t
he
partn
ersh
ips a
nd re
sour
ces
mob
iliza
tion
sect
ion
Firs
t yea
rR
egio
nal fi
nanc
ial
auto
nom
yIn
tern
al in
stitu
tiona
l tra
inin
g w
orks
hops
on
DR
M ($
200,
000)
$200
,000
REC
NEP
AD
AC
BF
ECA
11A
ntic
ipat
ive
read
ing
of
the
futu
re
and
scen
ario
bu
ildin
g
Con
duct
futu
re
anal
ysis
and
scen
ario
pl
anni
ng
Und
erta
ke c
apac
ity b
uild
ing
thro
ugh
train
ing
and
wor
ksho
ps o
n de
velo
pmen
t, fu
ture
ana
lysi
s, an
d sc
enar
io
plan
ning
Firs
t yea
rD
evel
op m
echa
nism
s fo
r fut
ure
anal
ysis
and
sc
enar
io p
lann
ing
Expe
rt te
ams t
o de
velo
p th
e co
nten
t and
supp
ort
rollo
ut ($
200,
000)
$200
,000
REC
NEP
AD
AC
BF
ECA
Prop
osed
CD
inte
rven
tions
to a
ddre
ss o
ther
cap
acity
nee
ds
12A
ppro
ach
to
harn
ess t
he
capa
citie
s of t
he
Afr
ican
dia
spor
a
App
roac
hes f
or
enga
ging
and
usi
ng
the
serv
ices
of t
he
Afr
ican
dia
spor
a w
ith
rele
vant
tech
nica
l sk
ills
Des
ign
appr
oach
es a
nd tr
ain
on sc
hem
es a
nd m
echa
nism
s to
mob
ilize
the A
fric
an d
iasp
ora
as a
pot
entia
l ass
et, i
nclu
ding
sh
ort-t
erm
skill
s tra
nsfe
r th
roug
h te
mpo
rary
wor
k on
pr
ojec
ts
Firs
t 6
mon
ths
Avai
labi
lity
of a
larg
er
capa
city
pla
tform
for u
se
in A
fric
a
Dev
elop
men
t and
im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e st
rate
gy ($
255,
000)
$255
,000
REC
sN
EPA
DA
CB
FEC
AA
fDB
Afr
ica
UN
DP
Reg
iona
l B
urea
u
13Yo
uth
and
wom
enIn
clus
ion
of y
outh
an
d w
omen
in
empl
oym
ent a
t the
re
gion
al le
vel
Cre
ate,
exp
and,
and
in
stitu
tiona
lize
volu
ntee
r and
in
tern
ship
sche
mes
targ
eted
at
yout
h an
d w
omen
to in
crea
se
thei
r inv
olve
men
t in
regi
onal
in
stitu
tions
Urg
ent
Yout
h an
d w
omen
be
com
ing
the
truly
ce
ntra
l pill
ars
A k
ey in
stitu
tiona
lized
pr
oces
s of a
recr
uitm
ent
stra
tegy
that
focu
ses o
n yo
uth
and
wom
en
Dev
elop
men
t and
in
stitu
tion a
lizat
ion
($20
0,00
0)
$200
,000
REC
sN
EPA
DA
CB
FEC
A (con
tinue
d)
32
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts
Lea
d re
spon
sibi
lity
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
14Te
chno
logy
an
d in
nova
tion
capa
city
Enha
nced
inno
vatio
n an
d ch
ange
-driv
en
abili
ties
Stre
amlin
e an
d es
tabl
ish
cent
ers o
f exc
elle
nce
and
inno
vatio
n hu
bs a
t the
regi
onal
le
vel.
This
will
invo
lve
the
inst
alla
tion
and
enha
ncem
ent
of IT
net
wor
ks a
t the
regi
onal
le
vel
Firs
t 2
year
sC
reat
e en
ablin
g en
viro
nmen
ts a
nd
spac
e fo
r tec
hnol
ogy
and
inno
vatio
n to
war
d A
gend
a 20
63
Cos
ts re
late
d to
the
esta
blis
hmen
t of c
ente
rs
and
the
inst
alla
tion
and
enha
ncem
ent o
f IT
netw
orks
($40
0,00
0)
$400
,000
REC
sPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Civ
il So
ciet
yA
cade
mia
15Li
nkag
e lo
ops
from
the
cont
inen
tal t
o th
e re
gion
al
and
the
natio
nal
leve
ls
Stre
ngth
enin
g fe
edba
ck a
nd
repo
rting
mec
hani
sms
at a
ll le
vels
. Thi
s will
in
volv
e m
onito
ring
and
regu
lariz
ing
the
linka
ge p
roce
ss.
Dev
elop
impl
emen
tatio
n-re
porti
ng m
echa
nism
s tha
t en
sure
that
Mem
ber S
tate
s are
ac
coun
tabl
e to
them
selv
es a
s a
colle
ctiv
e in
impl
emen
ting
Ass
embl
y de
cisi
ons.
This
will
cr
eate
bot
tom
-up
and
top-
dow
n lin
kage
s.
Firs
t 6
mon
ths
Esta
blis
h a
func
tioni
ng
feed
back
syst
em th
at
trans
cend
s all
exis
ting
leve
ls. T
his w
ill
invo
lve
mon
itorin
g an
d re
gula
rizin
g th
e lin
kage
pr
oces
s.
Cos
ts re
late
d to
th
e de
velo
pmen
t of
info
rmat
ion
and
know
ledg
e m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
s ($3
50,0
00)
$350
,000
REC
sM
embe
r St
ates
AU
C
Indi
cativ
e se
ed a
mou
nt re
quire
d fo
r sta
rt-up
CD
inte
rven
tions
in th
is C
DP
$4,7
80,0
00
Not
e: T
BD =
to b
e de
term
ined
.
Tab
le 4
.1 R
egio
nal
sta
rt-u
p c
apac
ity
inte
rven
tio
ns
(con
tinue
d)
33
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
5PROPOSED NATIONAL CAPACITY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The national CDP matrix (table 5.1) pres-ents a template that can be contextualized to individual countries. Although the for-mal capacity needs assessment for Agenda 2063 is yet to be undertaken at the national level, some generic and start-up capacity needs must be addressed, for which the table gives some indicative, foundational, and capacity-enhancing interventions (subject
to revision when the national needs assess-ments are completed). These interventions are to be carried out by Member States, stakeholder groups, and institutions at the national level.
The table has six key issue areas (first row), plus the timeline, indicative costs, and pro-posed key supporting organizations.
34
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Tab
le 5
.1 N
atio
nal
sta
rt-u
p c
apac
ity
inte
rven
tio
ns
No
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
and
inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts
(ave
rage
es
timat
e pe
r co
untr
y)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
1M
ind-
set
trans
form
atio
nN
eed
to p
ut in
pla
ce
new
initi
ativ
es to
de
sign
, pro
mot
e,
and
achi
eve
a w
ell
ideo
logi
zed
and
prom
oted
min
d-se
t tra
nsfo
rmat
ion
agen
da
Incu
lcat
e Afr
ican
val
ue
syst
ems t
hrou
ghou
t the
po
pula
tion,
incl
udin
g in
sc
hool
s, fa
mili
es, a
nd
wor
kpla
ces
Dev
elop
an
outre
ach
prog
ram
(c
ount
ry-s
peci
fic) f
or A
gend
a 20
63, t
o re
ach
all s
egm
ents
of
soci
ety
Firs
t yea
rA
com
mon
ideo
logi
cal
grou
ndin
g an
d a
colle
ctiv
e m
ovem
ent f
or
“The
Afr
ica
We
Wan
t”Se
lf-co
nfide
nce,
self-
awar
enes
s, ow
ners
hip
of
reso
urce
s, an
d re
writ
ing
our n
arra
tives
Dev
elop
pub
licat
ion
and
IT c
omm
unic
atio
n at
the
natio
nal l
evel
($10
0,00
0)C
onsu
ltativ
e pr
oces
ses
to in
culc
ate
the
com
mon
id
eolo
gica
l gro
undi
ng
and
colle
ctiv
e m
ovem
ent
($10
0,00
0)
$200
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esA
cade
mia
CSO
sPr
ivat
e se
ctor
2Im
plem
enta
tion
foca
l poi
ntN
eed
for a
n es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f an
Age
nda
2063
foca
l po
int a
t the
Mem
ber
Stat
e le
vel
Cre
ate
and
train
spec
ial
impl
emen
tatio
n br
igad
e un
its
as p
art o
f nat
iona
l ins
titut
ions
Urg
ent
Mor
e ef
ficie
nt n
atio
nal
inst
itutio
ns d
eliv
erin
g pr
ogra
ms a
nd p
roje
cts
fast
er
Kno
wle
dge
and
lear
ning
ro
undt
able
trai
ning
on
impl
emen
tatio
n pr
oces
ses
($30
0,00
0)
$300
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esR
ECs
3In
stitu
tiona
l st
reng
thR
estru
ctur
ing
natio
nal
inst
itutio
nsQ
uick
ly e
ngag
e in
the
rest
ruct
urin
g/re
desi
gnin
g of
the
set-u
p of
nat
iona
l in
stitu
tions
aim
ing
tow
ard
Age
nda
2063
, with
the
aim
to
esta
blis
h in
stitu
tions
that
are
fit
for p
urpo
se fo
r Age
nda
2063
Urg
ent
Ref
orm
nat
iona
l in
stitu
tions
that
are
mor
e fit
for p
urpo
se
Proc
ure
a co
nsul
tant
($
250,
000)
$250
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esA
CB
F
4H
uman
cap
acity
CTS
Dev
elop
, with
exp
erts
’ tra
inin
g su
ppor
t, sy
stem
s for
trac
king
an
d m
appi
ng o
f the
cur
rent
nu
mbe
rs o
f CTS
spec
ialis
ts
and
prod
uce
num
bers
in
vario
us C
TS e
duca
tion
area
s an
d in
STE
M
Firs
t yea
rA
poo
l of C
TS sp
ecia
lists
th
at c
an b
e ca
lled
upon
to
und
erta
ke a
nd d
eliv
er
on n
atio
nal (
as w
ell a
s re
gion
al a
nd c
ontin
enta
l) pr
ojec
ts a
nd p
rogr
ams
Expe
rts’ s
ervi
ce fe
es,
incl
udin
g tra
inin
g fe
es
($25
0,00
0)
$250
,000
Mem
bers
St
ates
REC
sPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Aca
dem
ia
Gre
ater
app
licat
ion
of th
e so
ft sk
ills i
n na
tiona
l ins
titut
ions
Elab
orat
e an
d im
plem
ent,
with
ex
pert
supp
ort,
the
soft
skill
s tra
inin
g ag
enda
Firs
t yea
rFo
cus o
n so
ft sk
ills
durin
g hu
man
reso
urce
tra
inin
g, re
view
, as
sess
men
t, an
d ev
alua
tion
Stud
y on
the
new
skill
set
($20
0,00
0)Tr
aini
ng a
nd th
e de
velo
pmen
t of a
stra
tegy
($35
0,00
0)
$550
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esC
ivil
soci
ety
35
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
and
inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts
(ave
rage
es
timat
e pe
r co
untr
y)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
5Sy
stem
s and
w
ork
proc
esse
sEf
fect
ive
and
effic
ient
in
stitu
tiona
l int
erna
l sy
stem
s, pr
oced
ures
, an
d ca
pabi
litie
s
Esta
blis
h an
d do
cum
ent
guid
elin
es o
n bu
reau
crat
ic/
non-
bure
aucr
atic
wor
k pr
oces
ses,
proc
edur
es, a
nd
rela
ted
supp
ortin
g fu
nctio
ns
such
as M
&E,
repo
rting
, bu
dget
ing,
pro
cure
men
t, re
crui
tmen
t, w
ork
plan
ning
, cl
ient
man
agem
ent,
polic
y de
velo
pmen
t, pe
rfor
man
ce/
qual
ity m
anag
emen
t, re
sults
m
anag
emen
t, de
cisi
on-m
akin
g,
finan
cial
and
hum
an re
sour
ce
man
agem
ent,
and
coor
dina
tion
and
rela
tions
hips
with
oth
er
entit
ies
Firs
t yea
rA
syst
em o
f cle
arly
de
fined
mea
sure
s of
perf
orm
ance
and
succ
ess
Proc
ess a
nd e
stab
lish
perf
orm
ance
man
agem
ent
syst
ems (
$250
,000
)Tr
aini
ng a
nd lo
gist
ical
co
sts (
$250
,000
)
$500
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esR
ECs
6In
form
atio
n an
d ac
cess
to
know
ledg
e
Mec
hani
sms i
n pl
ace
for o
rgan
izat
ions
to b
e kn
owle
dge
driv
en fo
r A
gend
a 20
63
Bui
ld a
stro
ng sk
ills a
nd
know
ledg
e ba
se fo
r the
im
plem
enta
tion
of A
gend
a 20
63
Firs
t yea
rSt
reng
then
syst
ems
and
stru
ctur
es fo
r th
e ge
nera
tion
of th
e kn
owle
dge
and
expe
rtise
Esta
blis
h kn
owle
dge
and
info
rmat
ion
man
agem
ent
syst
ems i
n ea
ch
orga
niza
tion,
whi
ch w
ill
beco
me
its o
rgan
izat
iona
l cu
lture
($30
0,00
0)
$300
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esR
ECs
Priv
ate
sect
orA
cade
mia
7C
hang
e an
d tra
nsfo
rmat
ive
capa
citie
s
Tran
sfor
mat
iona
l cu
lture
Top
lead
ersh
ip
and
man
agem
ent
optim
ism
, and
top
man
agem
ent
owne
rshi
p of
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g
Und
erta
ke n
atio
nal t
rain
ing
cour
ses,
with
exp
erts
’ adv
ice
and
reco
mm
enda
tions
, on
trans
form
ativ
e cu
lture
and
ga
me-
chan
ging
lead
ersh
ip
Firs
t yea
rN
atio
nal c
itize
ns
with
inte
rnal
ized
and
de
term
ined
spiri
t of
trans
form
atio
nal c
ultu
re
Wor
ksho
ps o
n tra
nsfo
rmat
ive
and
acco
unta
ble
lead
ersh
ip
($35
5,00
0)
$355
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esR
ECs
Civ
il so
ciet
y
Cha
nge
read
ines
s at
titud
es a
t the
na
tiona
l lev
el
Dev
elop
a p
latfo
rm to
en
cour
age
and
rew
ard
crea
tivity
and
inno
vatio
n
Urg
ent
Ren
ew a
nd tr
ansf
orm
th
e ap
proa
ch to
wor
k,
prog
ram
s,, a
nd p
roje
cts
Trai
ning
/wor
ksho
p-re
late
d co
sts (
$250
,000
)Pr
oduc
tion
of tr
aini
ng
mat
eria
ls ($
70,0
00)
$320
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esC
ivil
soci
ety
Aca
dem
ia
Tran
sfor
mat
iona
l cu
lture
at t
he n
atio
nal
leve
l
Iden
tify
inst
itutio
nal c
ultu
res
that
hav
e to
be
trans
form
ed a
t th
e na
tiona
l lev
el a
nd c
ondu
ct
man
ager
s’ tra
inin
g
Urg
ent
Trai
n a
coho
rt of
m
anag
ers a
t the
nat
iona
l le
vel i
n tra
nsfo
rmat
iona
l cu
lture
Trai
ning
cos
ts ($
350,
000)
$350
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esC
ivil
soci
ety
Aca
dem
ia
(con
tinue
d)
36
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
and
inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts
(ave
rage
es
timat
e pe
r co
untr
y)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
8C
ompo
site
ca
paci
ties
Stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ngFa
cilit
atio
n,
coor
dina
tion,
and
pr
ogra
m m
anag
emen
t
Des
ign
and
inst
itute
a
com
posi
te c
apac
ities
refr
eshe
r tra
inin
g sc
hem
e ta
cklin
g th
e ke
y ar
eas o
f stra
tegi
c/vi
sion
ary
plan
ning
, fac
ilita
tion,
and
co
ordi
natio
nPr
ogra
m m
anag
emen
t and
op
erat
iona
lizat
ion
Firs
t 2
year
sR
elev
ant n
atio
nal
inst
itutio
ns p
rovi
ding
co
ntin
uous
relia
ble,
ef
ficie
nt, a
nd e
ffect
ive
serv
ices
to it
s ow
n ci
tizen
s
Dev
elop
stra
tegi
c th
inki
ng p
rogr
ams
($60
,000
)G
ive
train
ing
to
indi
vidu
als i
n M
embe
r St
ates
($30
0,00
0)
$360
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esC
ivil
soci
ety
Aca
dem
ia
9La
ck o
f dat
a on
A
fric
an d
iasp
ora
App
roac
hes f
or
enga
ging
and
usi
ng
the
serv
ices
of t
he
natio
nal d
iasp
ora
with
re
leva
nt a
nd te
chni
cal
skill
s
Dev
elop
a sk
ills d
atab
ase
for
the
natio
nals
in th
e di
aspo
ra
and
use
it fo
r rel
evan
t pro
ject
s.
Firs
t yea
rPr
ovid
e an
d m
aint
ain
a da
taba
se o
f nat
iona
ls o
ut
of th
e co
untry
Cos
ts re
late
d to
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
st
rate
gy ($
65,0
00)
Impl
emen
tatio
n co
sts
($25
0,00
0)
$315
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esC
ivil
soci
ety
Aca
dem
ia
10Ed
ucat
ion
syst
em n
ot
appr
opria
te
Tran
sfor
m e
duca
tion
for A
fric
ans i
n th
e co
ntex
t of A
gend
a 20
63
Mak
e ed
ucat
ion
rele
vant
to
the
natio
nal a
nd c
ontin
enta
l co
ntex
t, in
clud
ing
Afr
ican
va
lues
, foc
usin
g on
the
skill
ar
ea o
f tra
inin
g ba
sed
on
the
need
s and
em
ploy
men
t op
portu
nitie
s in
the
coun
tryD
evel
op a
mec
hani
sm to
fo
rmul
ate
and
artic
ulat
e th
e co
nten
t of P
an-A
fric
an
curr
icul
a in
uni
vers
ities
Cre
ate
a m
echa
nism
to c
aptu
re
know
ledg
e of
the
olde
r ge
nera
tion
on P
an-A
fric
anis
mSt
reng
then
voc
atio
nal,
grad
uate
, pos
tgra
duat
e, a
nd o
n-th
e-jo
b tra
inin
gEs
tabl
ish
and
stre
ngth
en
plat
form
s for
trip
artit
e so
cial
di
alog
ue b
etw
een
labo
r uni
ons,
empl
oyer
bod
ies,
and
yout
h or
gani
zatio
ns
Firs
t yea
rEd
ucat
ion
syst
em m
ore
appr
opria
te to
Afr
ica
Dev
elop
new
cur
ricul
a an
d ha
rmon
ize
it w
ith th
e ne
eds o
f Age
nda
2063
Dev
elop
a g
ener
atio
nal
map
ping
to c
aptu
re
the
olde
r gen
erat
ion’
s kn
owle
dge
of P
an-
Afr
ican
ism
and
tran
smit
it to
the
new
gen
erat
ion
Cos
ts re
late
d to
de
velo
pmen
t of c
urric
ula
($10
0,00
0)D
evel
opm
ent o
f a
gene
ratio
nal m
appi
ng($
65,0
00)
$165
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esC
ivil
soci
ety
Aca
dem
iaR
ECs
Tab
le 5
.1 N
atio
nal
sta
rt-u
p c
apac
ity
inte
rven
tio
ns
(con
tinue
d)
37
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
and
inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts
(ave
rage
es
timat
e pe
r co
untr
y)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
11Im
plem
ent
Age
nda
2063
at
the
natio
nal
leve
l
Rol
e of
the
priv
ate
sect
orG
over
nanc
e an
d m
anag
emen
t of
Age
nda
2063
im
plem
enta
tion
at
natio
nal l
evel
s
Bui
ld c
apac
ity v
ia a
wor
king
pa
ct in
volv
ing
acad
emia
, th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
(ind
ustry
), an
d th
e pu
blic
sect
or. T
his
enga
gem
ent o
f sta
keho
lder
s en
able
s act
ors t
o co
ntrib
ute
to
and
influ
ence
dec
isio
nsSt
reng
then
resu
lts-tr
acki
ng
and
repo
rting
syst
ems a
nd
mec
hani
sms,
incl
udin
g th
e de
velo
pmen
t and
ado
ptio
n of
a
com
mon
form
at fo
r rep
ortin
g on
Age
nda
2063
acr
oss t
he
cont
inen
t
Firs
t yea
rA
stro
ng p
ublic
–priv
ate
partn
ersh
ip fo
r Age
nda
2063
Follo
w u
p on
im
plem
enta
tion
of
Age
nda
2063
pro
gram
s at
the
natio
nal l
evel
Esta
blis
h m
echa
nism
s fo
r pro
mot
ing
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
A
gend
a 20
63
Cos
ts re
late
d to
setti
ng u
p m
echa
nism
s ($7
5,00
0)Fo
llow
-up
cost
s ($
50,0
00)
$125
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esC
ivil
soci
ety
Aca
dem
iaPu
blic
in
stitu
tions
Priv
ate
sect
or
12C
apac
ity
rete
ntio
n an
d ca
paci
ty
utili
zatio
n
Abs
ence
of s
kills
re
tent
ion
and
utili
zatio
n po
licy
Des
ign
and
impl
emen
t (w
ith
train
ing)
a c
onsu
ltativ
e pr
oces
s th
at c
an e
nd in
the
prep
arat
ion
or st
reng
then
ing
of a
pol
icy
pack
age
addr
essi
ng th
e is
sue
Enha
nce
capa
city
rete
ntio
n th
roug
h in
tern
atio
nal
agre
emen
tsD
evel
op m
echa
nism
s to
inte
grat
e an
d in
corp
orat
e sk
ills
with
in a
cou
ntry
Firs
t yea
rD
evel
op sk
ills r
eten
tion
and
a ut
iliza
tion
mec
hani
sm in
eac
h co
untry
Cos
ts re
late
d to
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f m
echa
nism
s and
ag
reem
ents
($25
0,00
0)
$250
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esC
ivil
Soci
ety
Aca
dem
iaPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Publ
ic se
ctor
13Sp
irit o
f Pan
-A
fric
anis
mC
apac
ity b
uild
ing
thro
ugh
train
ing
on
Afr
ican
val
ues,
unity
, an
d sp
irit
Bui
ld c
apac
ity th
roug
h tra
inin
g on
Pan
-Afr
ican
ism
Dev
elop
uni
ty a
nd sp
irit
indu
ctio
n st
rate
gy fo
r key
na
tiona
l pro
gram
man
ager
s an
d di
rect
ors t
o se
nsiti
ze
furth
er o
n Pa
n-A
fric
anis
m
Urg
ent
Ideo
logi
ze A
fric
ans o
n an
Afr
ican
Val
ue S
yste
m
and
a co
ncep
tion
of
Pan-
Afr
ican
ism
that
tra
nsce
nds c
ultu
res,
tradi
tions
, and
phy
sica
l bo
unda
ries
Pan-
Afr
ican
ist e
xper
ts
to c
ondu
ct tr
aini
ng
wor
ksho
ps ($
200,
000)
$200
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esR
ECs
AU
CC
ivil
soci
ety
Priv
ate
sect
or
(con
tinue
d)
38
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
and
inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts
(ave
rage
es
timat
e pe
r co
untr
y)L
ead
resp
onsi
bilit
y
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
14N
onin
clus
ion
of y
outh
and
w
omen
Incl
usio
n of
you
th
and
wom
en in
de
velo
pmen
t pr
oces
ses a
nd
lead
ersh
ip p
ositi
on
Esta
blis
h, th
roug
h tra
inin
g,
natio
nal p
roce
sses
to in
crea
se
the
role
of y
outh
and
wom
en
as c
entra
l pill
ars f
or A
gend
a 20
63
Urg
ent
Yout
h an
d w
omen
ch
ampi
onin
g th
eir
coun
tries
’ dev
elop
men
t ag
enda
s in
line
with
the
cont
inen
t dev
elop
men
t vi
sion
, “Th
e Afr
ica
We
Wan
t”
Cos
ts re
late
d to
the
esta
blis
hmen
t pro
cess
es
and
adop
tion
of n
atio
nal
polic
ies (
$300
,000
)
$300
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esR
ECs
AU
CPu
blic
sect
orC
ivil
soci
ety
Priv
ate
sect
or
15D
RM
Dev
elop
an
inte
grat
ed D
RM
pl
an th
at ta
ckle
s illi
cit fi
nanc
ial
flow
s and
cov
ers t
he O
basa
njo
initi
ativ
e an
d pr
ivat
e se
ctor
/in
divi
dual
initi
ativ
esM
atch
cer
tain
reso
urce
stre
ams
with
key
Age
nda
2063
pro
ject
s
Urg
ent
Dev
elop
a N
atio
nal D
RM
an
d a
natio
nal s
trate
gy to
fig
ht c
apita
l out
flow
s
Dev
elop
the
stra
tegy
and
th
e pl
an ($
150,
000)
Trai
ning
wor
ksho
ps
($20
0,00
0)
$350
,000
Mem
ber
Stat
esA
UC
REC
sA
fDB
Indi
cativ
e se
ed a
mou
nt re
quire
d fo
r sta
rt-up
CD
inte
rven
tions
in th
is C
DP
$5,4
40,0
00
Tab
le 5
.1 N
atio
nal
sta
rt-u
p c
apac
ity
inte
rven
tio
ns
(con
tinue
d)
39
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
6PROPOSED CAPACITY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THREE STAKEHOLDER GROUPS
Developing the multistakeholder CDP templates
This chapter presents three templates of stakeholder CDPs for youth, women, and ac-ademia, with indicative interventions. As with the earlier tables, the areas of intervention are not static and will need to be periodical-ly updated, expanded, and contextualized in line with the work of each stakeholder group
(private sector, CSOs, and so on). The out-comes of the interventions will be the basis for identifying, updating, or expanding fur-ther interventions.
The tables have six key issue areas (first row), plus the timeline, indicative costs, and proposed key supporting organizations. The areas of broad capacity gaps and needs derive from the capacity needs assessment.
40
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Tab
le 6
.1 S
tart
-up
cap
acit
y in
terv
enti
on
s fo
r yo
uth
No.
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts1
Lea
d re
spon
sibi
lity
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
1M
ind-
set
trans
form
atio
nFo
rmul
ate
and
desi
gn
new
initi
ativ
es
to p
rom
ote
and
achi
eve
min
d-se
t tra
nsfo
rmat
ion
in th
e ea
rly y
ears
of A
gend
a 20
63
Adv
ocat
e an
d lo
bby
for
min
d-se
t tra
nsfo
rmat
ion
and
an A
fric
an o
wne
rshi
p ag
enda
am
ong
yout
h
Urg
ent
A c
ontin
ent-w
ide
mov
emen
t tha
t cha
nges
th
e m
ind-
sets
of y
outh
, di
rect
ing
them
tow
ard
trans
form
ing
the
cont
inen
t
Des
ign
and
form
ulat
e pr
ogra
ms (
$150
,000
)A
dvoc
acy
and
awar
enes
s($
500,
000)
$650
,000
Yout
h ne
twor
ks/
grou
ps a
t all
leve
ls
Mem
ber
Stat
esC
SOs
REC
s
2C
reat
e an
A
gend
a 20
63
mov
emen
t
Incr
ease
kno
wle
dge
and
awar
enes
s of
Age
nda
2063
Sens
itize
you
th a
cros
s the
co
ntin
ent b
y de
velo
ping
cr
eativ
e an
d in
nova
tive
mat
eria
ls to
pub
liciz
e an
d pr
omot
e yo
uth
owne
rshi
p/pa
rtici
patio
n in
Age
nda
2063
Firs
t yea
rA
fric
an y
outh
’s o
wn
Age
nda
2063
Cos
ts re
late
d to
hol
ding
se
min
ars o
n A
gend
a 20
63
(pac
kage
s — tra
nspo
rt,
logi
stic
s, an
d fin
anci
al
reso
urce
s,)
$250
,000
Yout
h ne
twor
ks/
grou
ps a
t all
leve
ls
Mem
ber
Stat
esC
SOs
Med
ia h
ouse
s/gr
oups
3In
terg
ener
atio
nal
dial
ogue
/ne
twor
k
Prom
ote
dial
ogue
am
ong
age
grou
psLe
ad th
e pr
oces
s of f
oste
ring
inte
rgen
erat
iona
l dia
logu
e as
a
maj
or c
apac
ity u
nder
taki
ng to
in
crea
se in
form
ed o
wne
rshi
p an
d co
mm
itted
col
labo
ratio
n ac
ross
age
gro
ups a
nd
gene
ratio
ns
Firs
t yea
rA
uni
que
fram
ewor
k fo
r en
gagi
ng th
e co
mm
itmen
t an
d en
ergy
of A
fric
ans o
f di
ffere
nt a
ges
Con
sulta
tive
proc
ess
acro
ss a
ll ag
e gr
oups
on
fost
erin
g di
alog
ue($
400,
000)
$400
,000
Yout
h ne
twor
ks/
grou
ps a
t all
leve
ls
TBD
4Yo
uth
empo
wer
men
t an
d pa
rtici
patio
n in
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g
Enfo
rce
delib
erat
e ar
rang
emen
ts fo
r th
e tra
nsfe
r of
resp
onsi
bilit
y an
d pr
omot
e yo
uth
parti
cipa
tion
in
aspe
cts o
f Age
nda
2063
Lead
the
desi
gn o
f yo
uth
deve
lopm
ent a
nd
empo
wer
men
t stra
tegi
es a
nd
tool
s (in
clud
ing
train
ing)
ai
med
at i
ncre
asin
g an
d st
reng
then
ing
youn
g pe
ople
’s
invo
lvem
ent i
n th
e so
cial
, ec
onom
ic, a
nd p
oliti
cal l
ife o
f th
eir c
ount
ries i
n su
ppor
t of
Afr
ica’
s dev
elop
men
t
Urg
ent
Act
ive
parti
cipa
tion
of
yout
h in
dev
elop
men
t at
all
leve
ls. T
his c
ould
al
so in
clud
e se
tting
up
syst
ems a
nd m
echa
nism
s fo
r ens
urin
g th
e su
pply
an
d de
man
d of
you
ths
for v
ario
us c
ontin
enta
l, re
gion
al, a
nd n
atio
nal
inst
itutio
ns.
Org
aniz
e se
min
ars a
nd
roun
dtab
le to
faci
litat
e th
e em
pow
erm
ent a
nd
parti
cipa
tion
of y
outh
($
100,
000)
$100
,000
Yout
h ne
twor
ks/
grou
ps a
t all
leve
ls
CSO
sM
edia
hou
ses/
grou
ps
41
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No.
Are
as o
f bro
ad
capa
city
gap
s an
d ne
eds
iden
tified
/pr
iori
tized
Are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
tPr
opos
ed in
itial
CD
star
t‑up
ap
proa
ches
/inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts1
Lea
d re
spon
sibi
lity
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
5B
ridge
the
skill
s ga
pTr
ansf
orm
the
educ
atio
n sy
stem
with
a
view
to a
ligni
ng it
w
ith A
gend
a 20
63
Com
mis
sion
the
esta
blis
hmen
t of
pla
tform
s for
trip
artit
e so
cial
dia
logu
e be
twee
n la
bor
unio
ns, e
mpl
oyer
bod
ies,
and
yout
h or
gani
zatio
ns.
This
will
take
into
acc
ount
ad
voca
cy a
nd p
olic
y ch
ange
ai
med
at r
evita
lizin
g vo
catio
nal,
grad
uate
, po
stgr
adua
te, a
nd o
n-th
e-jo
b tra
inin
g to
ens
ure
that
ed
ucat
iona
l qua
lifica
tions
are
be
st su
ited
to th
e ne
eds o
f the
m
arke
t.
Firs
t yea
rA
redu
ctio
n in
you
th
empl
oym
ent i
n A
fric
a as
wel
l as i
ncre
ased
de
velo
pmen
t and
gro
wth
in
gro
ss n
atio
nal p
rodu
ctVo
catio
nal,
grad
uate
, po
stgr
adua
te, a
nd o
n-th
e-jo
b tra
inin
g to
ens
ure
that
thei
r edu
catio
nal
qual
ifica
tions
are
the
best
fit
for t
he jo
b m
arke
t
Con
sulta
tive
proc
ess a
t na
tiona
l lev
els t
o re
view
po
licie
s($
250,
000)
$250
,000
Yout
h ne
twor
ks a
t al
l lev
els w
ith
the
supp
ort
of M
inis
tries
/D
epar
tmen
ts
of b
asic
an
d hi
gher
ed
ucat
ion
at
the
natio
nal
leve
l
Aca
dem
iaU
nive
rsiti
esC
SOs
REC
s
6Ec
onom
ic a
ctor
s (e
mpl
oym
ent a
nd
entre
pren
eurs
hip)
Yout
h as
crit
ical
ec
onom
ic a
ctor
sD
esig
n pi
lot a
nd e
xpan
d yo
uth
CD
sche
mes
that
focu
s on
the
train
ing
of y
outh
to b
e em
ploy
men
t cre
ator
s rat
her
than
em
ploy
men
t see
kers
, pa
rtner
ing
the
priv
ate
and
publ
ic se
ctor
s in
criti
cal a
reas
Firs
t yea
rYo
uth
econ
omic
pa
rtici
patio
n, in
clud
ing
incr
easi
ng y
outh
op
portu
nitie
s for
self-
empl
oym
ent a
nd o
ther
fo
rms o
f em
ploy
men
t
Dev
elop
and
impl
emen
t po
licy
($35
0,00
0)$3
50,0
00Yo
uth
netw
orks
/gr
oups
at a
ll le
vels
Priv
ate
sect
orC
SOs
AU
REC
sM
embe
r St
ates
7In
vent
ors a
nd
inno
vato
rsEn
ablin
g en
viro
nmen
ts fo
r yo
uth
to b
e cr
eato
rs
Faci
litat
e th
e ur
gent
cre
atio
n of
sc
ienc
e pa
rks a
nd in
nova
tion
hubs
/cen
ters
at t
he n
atio
nal
and
regi
onal
leve
ls to
pro
mot
e ac
cess
to a
nd e
xcha
nge
of
info
rmat
ion,
kno
wle
dge,
ex
perie
nces
, and
stra
tegi
es,
and
new
tech
nolo
gies
Firs
t yea
rK
now
ledg
e ce
nter
s tha
t w
ill d
rive
inno
vatio
n fo
r de
velo
pmen
t acr
oss t
he
cont
inen
t
Set u
p an
d ru
n co
sts o
f na
tiona
l and
regi
onal
ne
twor
ks ($
400,
000)
$400
,000
Yout
h gr
oups
, w
orki
ng w
ith
CSO
s and
la
bor u
nion
s
Priv
ate
sect
orM
embe
r St
ates
Indi
cativ
e se
ed a
mou
nt re
quire
d fo
r sta
rt-up
CD
inte
rven
tions
in th
is C
DP
$2,4
00,0
00
1. A
vera
ge e
stim
ate
for m
ajor
you
th st
akeh
olde
r gro
ups f
or st
art-
up C
D a
nd st
reng
then
ing
arra
ngem
ents
.
42
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Tab
le 6
.2 S
tart
-up
cap
acit
y in
terv
enti
on
s fo
r w
om
en
No.
Bro
ad c
apac
ity
gaps
and
nee
dsA
reas
for
impr
ovem
ent
Prop
osed
CD
inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or d
esire
d ou
tcom
esC
ostin
g el
emen
tsIn
dica
tive
cost
s1Le
ad
resp
onsi
bilit
yPr
opos
ed k
ey
supp
ortin
g or
gani
zatio
ns
1Em
pow
erm
ent
and
parti
cipa
tion
Mai
nstre
am A
gend
a 20
63 p
rogr
ams/
proj
ects
for w
omen
Set u
p sy
stem
s and
m
echa
nism
s for
ens
urin
g th
at
visi
onar
y w
omen
are
incl
uded
in
key
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g pr
oces
ses f
or “
The
“Afr
ica
We
Wan
t”D
esig
n fo
llow
-up
mec
hani
sms
that
mon
itor t
he tr
aini
ng a
nd
deve
lopm
ent o
f wom
en o
n A
gend
a 20
63
Urg
ent
Age
nda
2063
im
plem
enta
tion
is h
eavi
ly
driv
en b
y w
omen
Prom
ote
parti
cipa
tion
thro
ugh
dial
ogue
, ed
ucat
ion,
and
trai
ning
/w
orks
hops
($35
0,00
0)
$350
,000
Wom
en’s
ne
twor
ks a
t al
l lev
els
Mem
ber
Stat
esC
SOs
Aca
dem
iaA
UC
REC
s
2M
ind-
set
trans
form
atio
nN
eed
to d
esig
n ne
w
initi
ativ
es to
pro
mot
e an
d ac
hiev
e m
ind-
set
trans
form
atio
n in
the
early
yea
rs o
f Age
nda
2063
Form
a m
ind-
set
trans
form
atio
n br
ains
torm
ing
team
, inc
ludi
ng a
cade
mia
and
yo
uth
Org
aniz
e a
serie
s of m
ind-
set
trans
form
atio
n pi
lot s
emin
ars
acro
ss th
e co
ntin
ent
Urg
ent
Acc
eler
atin
g A
fric
a’s
trans
form
atio
n by
in
crea
sing
thei
r sel
f-co
nfide
nce
and
belie
f in
them
selv
es, a
nd e
ither
re
writ
ing
the
narr
ativ
e or
w
ritin
g a
new
nar
rativ
e ba
sed
on P
an-A
fric
anis
m
and
Afr
ican
rena
issa
nce
Des
ign
and
form
ulat
e pr
ogra
ms (
$150
,000
)A
dvoc
acy
and
awar
enes
s($
300,
000)
$450
,000
Wom
en’s
ne
twor
ks a
t al
l lev
els
AU
CM
embe
r St
ates
Aca
dem
iaC
SOs
3A
gric
ultu
ral
prod
uctiv
ity a
nd
prod
uctio
n
Leve
rage
the
skill
s, kn
owle
dge,
and
co
mm
itmen
t of
wom
en in
agr
icul
ture
Agg
ress
ivel
y pu
rsue
m
echa
nism
s and
pro
gram
s at
all l
evel
s to
take
adv
anta
ge
of a
nd le
vera
ge th
e po
tent
ial
of w
omen
as l
eade
rs a
nd
inno
vato
rs in
agr
icul
ture
Firs
t yea
rW
omen
are
eco
nom
ic
driv
ers o
f the
Afr
ican
ec
onom
y th
roug
h ta
rget
ed p
rogr
ams t
o su
ppor
t and
stre
ngth
en
wom
en fa
rmer
s and
en
trepr
eneu
rs
Trai
ning
and
wor
ksho
ps
on a
gri-b
usin
ess w
ealth
- cr
eatio
n sk
ills (
$300
,000
)C
onte
nt d
evel
opm
ent
and
supp
ort f
or ro
llout
($
200,
000)
$500
,000
Wom
en’s
ne
twor
ks a
t al
l lev
els
Mem
ber
Stat
esA
UC
/NEP
AD
REC
sPr
ivat
e se
ctor
CSO
s
4Th
e nu
mbe
r of
wom
en
empl
oyed
at
cont
inen
tal,
regi
onal
, an
d na
tiona
l in
stitu
tions
The
need
for a
de
liber
ate
incl
usio
n of
w
omen
em
ploy
men
t at
all
leve
ls
Des
ign/
impl
emen
t em
ploy
men
t-orie
nted
in
tern
ship
s on
a la
rger
scal
e to
incr
ease
the
invo
lvem
ent o
f yo
ung
wom
en in
con
tinen
tal,
regi
onal
, and
nat
iona
l st
ruct
ures
Firs
t 2
year
sW
omen
taki
ng u
p po
sitio
ns a
t the
co
ntin
enta
l, re
gion
al, a
nd
natio
nal l
evel
s
Con
tent
dev
elop
men
t an
d su
ppor
t for
rollo
ut
($40
0,00
0)
$400
,000
Wom
en’s
ne
twor
ks a
t al
l lev
els
Priv
ate
sect
orC
SOs
43
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN5
Rei
nven
t th
e Afr
ican
ed
ucat
ion
syst
em w
ith a
fo
cus o
n w
omen
Incr
ease
the
num
ber
of w
omen
enr
olle
d in
edu
catio
nal
inst
itutio
ns
Adv
ocat
e th
roug
h fo
rum
s, di
alog
ue, a
nd p
olic
y de
velo
pmen
t for
incr
ease
d en
rollm
ent o
f wom
en in
STE
M
Firs
t yea
rM
ass p
rodu
ctio
n of
w
omen
’s sk
ills i
n cr
itica
l an
d se
ctor
-spe
cific
skill
s ar
eas
Con
sulta
tive
proc
ess a
nd
cont
ent d
evel
opm
ent
at th
e na
tiona
l lev
el to
re
view
pol
icie
s($
300,
000)
$300
,000
Wom
en’s
ne
twor
ks a
t al
l lev
els
6Fl
agsh
ip
Proj
ects
Wom
en’s
incl
usio
n an
d pa
rtici
patio
n in
de
liver
ing
on th
ese
proj
ects
Dev
elop
and
impl
emen
t a
supp
ly a
nd d
eman
d sy
stem
w
ith th
e ai
m o
f ach
ievi
ng
wom
en’s
par
ticip
atio
n in
thes
e pr
ojec
ts
Firs
t yea
rB
uild
the
capa
city
of
wom
en to
par
take
in
deliv
erin
g on
the
flags
hip
Proj
ects
thro
ugh
train
ing,
fin
ance
, and
an
enab
ling
envi
ronm
ent
Des
ign
and
man
age
o sy
stem
($40
0,00
0)Tr
aini
ng se
min
ars a
nd
wor
ksho
ps ($
250,
000)
$650
,000
Wom
en’s
ne
twor
ks a
t al
l lev
els
CSO
sM
embe
r St
ates
Indi
cativ
e se
ed a
mou
nt re
quire
d fo
r sta
rt-up
CD
inte
rven
tions
in th
is C
DP
$2,6
50,0
00
1 Av
erag
e es
timat
e fo
r maj
or w
omen
’s st
akeh
olde
r net
wor
ks fo
r sta
rt-u
p CD
and
stre
ngth
enin
g ar
rang
emen
ts.
44
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Tab
le 6
.3 S
tart
-up
cap
acit
y in
terv
enti
on
s fo
r ac
adem
ia a
nd
thin
k ta
nks
No.
Bro
ad c
apac
ity
gaps
and
nee
dsA
reas
for
impr
ovem
ent
Prop
osed
CD
inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts
Lea
d re
spon
sibi
lity
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
1M
ind-
set
trans
form
atio
nFi
ne-tu
ning
an
Afr
ican
ex
iste
ntia
l ide
olog
y bu
ilt o
n A
fric
an v
alue
s an
d co
nfide
nce
for a
de
stin
y of
gre
atne
ss
Set u
p ta
sk te
ams t
o de
velo
p an
d im
plem
ent a
cur
ricul
um
on A
fric
an id
eolo
gy, a
nd
the A
fric
an D
evel
opm
ent
Para
digm
at a
ll st
eps o
f the
ed
ucat
ion
proc
ess
Firs
t 2
year
sSe
nse
of c
onfid
ence
, co
nsci
ousn
ess,
wor
king
on
Afr
ica’
s des
tiny,
and
ow
ners
hip
of th
e Afr
ican
na
rrat
ive
and
bran
d
Con
tinen
t-wid
e co
nsul
tativ
e pr
oces
s ($
1,00
0,00
0)
$1,0
00,0
00A
cade
mia
/th
ink
tank
sM
embe
r St
ates
CSO
sPr
ivat
e se
ctor
AU
C a
nd A
U
inst
itutio
nsR
ECs
2R
edes
ign
the
educ
atio
n sy
stem
Tran
sfor
m A
fric
an
educ
atio
n, fo
cusi
ng
on A
fric
an id
eolo
gies
an
d va
lues
and
em
phas
izin
g C
TS a
nd
STEM
Bui
ld c
apac
ity b
y re
desi
gnin
g th
e cu
rren
t edu
catio
nal
syst
em to
refo
rm a
nd d
esig
n th
e co
nten
t of a
new
Afr
ican
ed
ucat
ion
agen
da g
roun
ded
in
Afr
ican
val
ues a
nd a
spira
tions
Firs
t 2
year
sD
evel
op a
uni
que
cont
inen
tal e
duca
tiona
l ag
enda
driv
en b
y th
e vi
sion
of A
gend
a 20
63
Expe
nses
rela
ted
to th
e re
desi
gn o
f the
edu
catio
n sy
stem
($80
0,00
0)
$800
,000
Aca
dem
ia/
thin
k ta
nks
Thin
k ta
nks
Mem
ber
Stat
esC
SOs
Red
esig
n an
d ch
ange
A
fric
an e
duca
tion
curr
icul
a
Reo
rient
the
acad
emic
pro
gram
an
d co
rrec
t the
dis
conn
ectio
n be
twee
n un
iver
sity
cur
ricul
a an
d th
e im
pera
tives
of A
gend
a 20
63
Firs
t 2
year
sA
fric
an e
duca
tion
curr
icul
um is
Afr
o-ce
ntric
w
ith a
focu
s on
prod
ucin
g gr
adua
tes f
or A
fric
a’s
deve
lopm
ent
Con
tent
dev
elop
men
t, co
nsul
tativ
e pr
oces
ses,
and
nego
tiatio
n an
d lo
bbyi
ng o
n pr
opos
als
($35
0,00
0)
$350
,000
Aca
dem
ia/
thin
k ta
nks
Mem
ber
Stat
esA
UPr
ivat
e se
ctor
REC
s
3Fl
agsh
ip p
roje
cts
rela
ted
to
acad
emia
Prod
uce
hard
skill
s re
leva
nt to
flag
ship
pr
ojec
ts
Rei
nvig
orat
e th
e st
reng
then
ing
and
expa
nsio
n of
TV
ET
train
ing
cent
ers t
hrou
gh th
e de
velo
pmen
t of f
ocus
ed
prog
ram
s for
Age
nda
2063
Urg
ent
Mas
sive
pro
duct
ion
of
criti
cal t
echn
ical
and
vo
catio
nal s
kills
for
Age
nda
2063
flag
ship
pr
ojec
ts a
nd o
ther
pr
ogra
ms
Cos
ts re
late
d to
cu
rric
ulum
rede
sign
an
d ed
ucat
ion
train
ing
($40
0,00
0)
$400
,000
Aca
dem
ia/
thin
k ta
nks
Mem
ber
Stat
esA
UPr
ivat
e se
ctor
REC
s
4D
ata
and
info
rmat
ion
Res
earc
h an
d da
ta
gene
ratio
n an
d ga
ther
ing
Des
ign
and
impl
emen
t ex
pert
supp
ort p
roce
sses
to
impl
emen
t a n
ew A
fric
an
appr
oach
to th
e da
ta re
volu
tion
and
know
ledg
e sy
stem
s tha
t bu
ild th
e ca
paci
ty fo
r Afr
ican
da
ta u
se, p
rodu
ctio
n, a
nd a
m
aint
enan
ce a
nd k
now
ledg
e-m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
for
deliv
erin
g on
Age
nda
2063
Firs
t 2
year
sG
reat
er o
pera
tiona
lizat
ion
of a
dat
a re
volu
tion
to
buttr
ess t
he v
isio
n fo
r Th
e Afr
ica
We
Wan
t and
A
fric
an o
wne
rshi
p
Syst
ems d
esig
n, tr
aini
ng,
and
the
pilo
ting
of d
ata
Afr
ican
dat
a us
e,
prod
uctio
n, a
nd a
m
aint
enan
ce a
nd
know
ledg
e- m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
($50
0,00
0)
$500
,000
Aca
dem
ia/
thin
k ta
nks
Thin
k ta
nks
CSO
s
45
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
No.
Bro
ad c
apac
ity
gaps
and
nee
dsA
reas
for
impr
ovem
ent
Prop
osed
CD
inte
rven
tions
Tim
elin
eTa
rget
s or
desi
red
outc
omes
Cos
ting
elem
ents
Indi
cativ
e co
sts
Lea
d re
spon
sibi
lity
Prop
osed
key
su
ppor
ting
orga
niza
tions
5In
crea
se th
e nu
mbe
r of
train
ers i
n th
e Afr
ican
ed
ucat
ion
syst
em
Trai
ning
trai
ners
to
redu
ce th
e cu
rren
t sk
ills g
aps
Des
ign
and
inst
itute
a n
ew
sche
me,
“B
uild
ing
the
capa
city
of
cap
acity
bui
lder
s” fo
r ac
adem
ia
Firs
t yea
rR
educ
e th
e sk
ills g
ap a
nd
incr
ease
the
prod
uctio
n of
indi
vidu
als’
skill
s to
pre
pare
them
for
cont
ribut
ing
to th
e fla
gshi
p pr
ojec
ts
Res
ourc
es fo
r the
exp
erts
to
trai
n th
e tra
iner
s on
the
requ
ired
skill
s for
the
flags
hip
proj
ects
($50
0,00
0)
$500
,000
Aca
dem
iath
ink
tank
sC
SOs
Priv
ate
sect
or
Indi
cativ
e se
ed a
mou
nt re
quire
d fo
r sta
rt-up
CD
inte
rven
tions
in th
is C
DP
$3,5
50,0
00
Not
e: T
BD =
to b
e de
term
ined
.
46
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
7INDICATIVE CAPACITIES REQUIRED FOR
FLAGSHIP PROGRAMS OF THE FIRST 10‑YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
This section analyzes and presents indicative capacities required for the flagship programs of the first 10-year plan. The key capacity dimensions prioritized include the required
CTS, as well as soft, composite, and trans-formative capacities. Each of these categories is accompanied by a column on proposed sourcing.
47
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLANTa
ble
7.1
Ind
icat
ive
cap
acit
ies
req
uir
ed fo
r fl
agsh
ip p
rog
ram
s o
f th
e fi
rst 1
0-ye
ar p
lan
Flag
ship
pr
ogra
ms
(in fi
rst 1
0-ye
ar p
lan)
CT
S pr
ofes
sion
als
requ
ired
fo
r fla
gshi
p pr
ogra
ms
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of C
TS
prof
essi
onal
sC
ompo
site
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng o
f co
mpo
site
ca
paci
ties
Soft
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of so
ft
capa
citie
s
Cha
nge
and
tran
sfor
mat
ive
capa
citie
s req
uire
d
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of c
hang
e an
d tr
ans.
capa
citie
sPr
opos
ed C
D
inte
rven
tion
1.
Inte
grat
ed
Hig
h-sp
eed
Trai
n N
etw
ork
Rai
lway
en
gine
ers
Civ
il en
gine
ers
Mec
hani
cal
engi
neer
sQ
uant
ity
surv
eyor
sC
onst
ruct
ion
proj
ect
man
ager
sFi
nanc
ial
inve
stm
ent
spec
ialis
tsIn
fras
truct
ure
spec
ialis
tsLa
nd
surv
eyor
sA
rchi
tect
sEl
ectri
cal
engi
neer
s
Mem
ber
Stat
esPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Aca
dem
iaC
TS
prof
essi
onal
bo
dies
Afr
ican
CTS
di
aspo
ra (i
n C
hina
, Ind
ia,
and
the
Wes
t)
Stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ngO
rgan
izat
iona
l and
co
ordi
natio
n ca
pabi
lity
Crit
ical
/stra
tegi
c th
inki
ng a
nd re
sults
-ba
sed
man
agem
ent
Proc
ess f
acili
tatio
n an
d or
gani
zatio
nal s
kills
(in
clud
ing
“fun
ctio
nal”
ca
paci
ties)
Crit
ical
supp
ort
syst
ems a
nd p
roce
sses
, in
clud
ing
the
use
of te
chno
logy
and
in
nova
tion
Dev
elop
pro
gram
sPl
an a
nd im
plem
ent
proj
ects
Fina
nce
the
owne
rshi
p an
d m
obili
zatio
n of
do
mes
tic re
sour
ces
Kno
wle
dge
syst
ems
to sp
eed
up p
roje
ct
impl
emen
tatio
nR
isk
man
agem
ent a
nd
miti
gatio
n an
d th
e ab
ility
to d
eal w
ith
bum
ps in
the
road
Leve
rage
ass
ets
Abi
lity
to n
egot
iate
and
be
per
suas
ive
Stak
ehol
der/
partn
ersh
ip-b
uild
ing
abili
ties
AU
CA
UC
In
stitu
tions
(N
EPA
D, P
AP,
an
d so
on)
REC
sPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Key
age
ncie
s (A
fDB
, EC
A,
and
so o
n)
Stro
ng c
omm
itmen
t at
the
lead
ersh
ip le
vel
Com
mitm
ent t
o de
velo
pmen
t out
com
esPr
oact
ive
appr
oach
Res
ults
orie
ntat
ion
(res
ults
-driv
en)
Acc
ount
abili
ty (f
or
resu
lts a
nd e
ffici
ency
)C
ontin
uous
hig
h le
vel
of e
nerg
y/co
mm
itmen
tA
bilit
y to
wor
k as
a
team
/com
mitm
ent
Trus
tPr
oble
m-s
olvi
ng sk
ills
Dili
genc
e an
d th
orou
ghne
ssSp
eed
and
urge
ncy
for
wor
k/ac
hiev
emen
tH
igh
ener
gy a
nd d
rive
Hea
vy w
orkl
oad
abili
ties/
hard
wor
king
at
titud
ePa
n-A
fric
an sp
irit a
nd
valu
es
Indi
vidu
als/
inst
itutio
ns
that
will
hav
e be
en c
aref
ully
sc
reen
ed
for t
hese
ca
paci
ties
befo
re th
ey
beco
me
invo
lved
Tran
sfor
mat
ive
lead
ersh
ip (i
nclu
ding
vi
sion
ing)
Top
lead
ersh
ip
and
man
agem
ent
optim
ism
/com
mitm
ent
Ow
ners
hip
of
deci
sion
-mak
ing
ICT
and
tech
nolo
gica
l pr
edis
posi
tion
Com
mitm
ent t
o in
nova
tion
and
inve
ntio
nR
isk
man
agem
ent
abili
ties
Peop
le m
otiv
ated
to
war
d a
shar
ed/
insp
iratio
nal v
isio
nC
hang
e re
adin
ess:
cr
eate
and
mai
ntai
n th
e de
sire
for c
hang
eA
bilit
y fo
r shi
fts in
m
ind-
set
Indi
vidu
als/
inst
itutio
ns
that
will
hav
e be
en c
aref
ully
sc
reen
ed
for t
hese
ca
paci
ties
befo
re th
ey
beco
me
invo
lved
1. Id
entif
y an
d es
tabl
ish
a po
ssib
le
rost
er o
f qua
lified
/su
itabl
e Afr
ican
sp
ecia
lists
who
can
pa
rtici
pate
in th
e im
plem
enta
tion
2. O
rgan
ize
shor
t or
ient
atio
n tra
inin
g on
th
e ob
ject
ives
3. D
esig
n an
d pr
ovid
e re
fres
her t
rain
ing
on
the
soft,
com
posi
te,
and
trans
form
ativ
e ca
paci
ty d
imen
sion
s to
ach
ieve
the
goal
s4.
Bui
ld in
a
sens
e of
urg
ency
-dr
iven
mon
itorin
g an
d tra
ckin
g on
im
plem
enta
tion
prog
ress
, as w
ell a
s fo
r ris
k an
d ch
alle
nges
m
anag
emen
t (con
tinue
d)
48
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Flag
ship
pr
ogra
ms
(in fi
rst 1
0-ye
ar p
lan)
CT
S pr
ofes
sion
als
requ
ired
fo
r fla
gshi
p pr
ogra
ms
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of C
TS
prof
essi
onal
sC
ompo
site
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng o
f co
mpo
site
ca
paci
ties
Soft
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of so
ft
capa
citie
s
Cha
nge
and
tran
sfor
mat
ive
capa
citie
s req
uire
d
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of c
hang
e an
d tr
ans.
capa
citie
sPr
opos
ed C
D
inte
rven
tion
2.
The A
fric
an
Virt
ual a
nd
e-U
nive
rsity
Kno
wle
dge
and
data
m
anag
emen
t sp
ecia
lists
Softw
are
deve
lope
rsM
icro
soft
syst
ems
engi
neer
sA
cade
mic
s an
d re
sear
cher
sIC
T sp
ecia
lists
Aca
dem
iaPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Afr
ican
di
aspo
raYo
uth
CTS
pr
ofes
sion
al
bodi
es
Crit
ical
supp
ort
syst
ems a
nd p
roce
sses
, in
clud
ing
the
use
of te
chno
logy
and
in
nova
tion
Stak
ehol
der/
partn
ersh
ip-b
uild
ing
abili
ties
Prog
ram
dev
elop
men
t, pr
ojec
t pla
nnin
g, a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
nPr
oces
s fac
ilita
tion
and
orga
niza
tiona
l ski
lls
(incl
udin
g “f
unct
iona
l”
capa
citie
sK
now
ledg
e sy
stem
s to
spee
d up
pro
ject
im
plem
enta
tion
Proj
ect p
lann
ing
and
impl
emen
tatio
nFi
nanc
ing
owne
rshi
p an
d D
RM
Ris
k m
anag
emen
t and
m
itiga
tion
and
the
abili
ty to
dea
l with
bu
mps
in th
e ro
ad
AU
CPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Com
mitm
ent t
o de
velo
pmen
t out
com
esPr
oact
ive
appr
oach
Res
ults
orie
ntat
ion
(res
ults
-driv
en)
Acc
ount
abili
ty (f
or
resu
lts a
nd e
ffici
ency
)C
ontin
uous
hig
h le
vel
of e
nerg
y/co
mm
itmen
tA
bilit
y to
wor
k as
a
team
/com
mitm
ent
Trus
tD
ilige
nce
and
thor
ough
ness
Spee
d an
d ur
genc
y fo
r w
ork/
achi
evem
ent
Indi
vidu
als/
inst
itutio
ns
that
will
hav
e be
en c
aref
ully
sc
reen
ed
for t
hese
ca
paci
ties
befo
re th
ey
beco
me
invo
lved
ICT
and
tech
nolo
gica
l pr
edis
posi
tion
Inno
vatio
n an
d in
vent
ion
com
mitm
ent
Ris
k m
anag
emen
t ab
ilitie
sPe
ople
mot
ivat
ed
tow
ard
a sh
ared
/in
spira
tiona
l vis
ion
Cha
nge
read
ines
s:
crea
te a
nd m
aint
ain
the
desi
re fo
r cha
nge
Abi
lity
for m
ind-
set
shift
s
1. Id
entif
y an
d es
tabl
ish
a po
ssib
le
rost
er o
f qua
lified
/su
itabl
e Afr
ican
sp
ecia
lists
who
can
pa
rtici
pate
in th
e im
plem
enta
tion
2. O
rgan
ize
shor
t or
ient
atio
n tra
inin
g on
th
e ob
ject
ives
3. D
esig
n an
d pr
ovid
e re
fres
her t
rain
ing
on
the
soft,
com
posi
te,
and
trans
form
ativ
e ca
paci
ty d
imen
sion
s to
ach
ieve
the
goal
s4.
Bui
ld in
a
sens
e of
urg
ency
-dr
iven
mon
itorin
g an
d tra
ckin
g of
im
plem
enta
tion
prog
ress
, as w
ell a
s fo
r ris
k an
d ch
alle
nges
m
anag
emen
t
Tab
le 7
.1 In
dic
ativ
e ca
pac
itie
s re
qu
ired
for
flag
ship
pro
gra
ms
of t
he
firs
t 10-
year
pla
n (c
ontin
ued)
49
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLANFl
agsh
ip
prog
ram
s (in
firs
t 10-
year
pla
n)
CT
S pr
ofes
sion
als
requ
ired
fo
r fla
gshi
p pr
ogra
ms
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of C
TS
prof
essi
onal
sC
ompo
site
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng o
f co
mpo
site
ca
paci
ties
Soft
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of so
ft
capa
citie
s
Cha
nge
and
tran
sfor
mat
ive
capa
citie
s req
uire
d
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of c
hang
e an
d tr
ans.
capa
citie
sPr
opos
ed C
D
inte
rven
tion
3.
Form
ulat
e a
Com
mod
ities
St
rate
gy
AU
CM
embe
r St
ates
REC
sK
ey a
genc
ies
(AfD
B, E
CA
, an
d so
on)
Stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ngO
rgan
izat
iona
l and
co
ordi
natio
n ca
pabi
lity
Crit
ical
/stra
tegi
c th
inki
ng a
nd re
sults
-ba
sed
man
agem
ent
Faci
litat
e th
e pr
oces
ses
and
orga
niza
tiona
l sk
ills (
incl
udin
g “f
unct
iona
l” c
apac
ities
)D
evel
op p
rogr
ams
Abi
lity
to n
egot
iate
and
be
per
suas
ive
AU
CA
UC
in
stitu
tions
(N
EPA
D, P
AP,
an
d so
on)
REC
sPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Polit
ical
will
Com
mitm
ent t
o de
velo
pmen
t out
com
esTr
ust
Res
ults
orie
ntat
ion
(res
ults
-driv
en)
Acc
ount
abili
ty (f
or
resu
lts a
nd e
ffici
ency
)C
ontin
uous
hig
h le
vel
of e
nerg
y/co
mm
itmen
tA
bilit
y to
wor
k as
a
team
/com
mitm
ent
Prob
lem
-sol
ving
skill
s
Indi
vidu
als/
inst
itutio
ns
that
will
hav
e be
en c
aref
ully
sc
reen
ed
for t
hese
ca
paci
ties
befo
re th
ey
beco
me
invo
lved
Top
lead
ersh
ip
and
man
agem
ent
optim
ism
/com
mitm
ent
Peop
le m
otiv
ated
to
war
d a
shar
ed/
insp
iratio
nal v
isio
nO
wne
rshi
p of
de
cisi
on-m
akin
gR
isk
man
agem
ent
abili
ties
Abi
lity
for s
hifts
in
min
d-se
t
Scre
en
indi
vidu
als/
inst
itutio
ns
care
fully
in
sear
ch
of th
ese
attit
udin
al/
pred
ispo
sitio
n ca
paci
ties
befo
re th
ey
are
invo
lved
/ho
ldin
g ke
y ro
les i
n th
is
maj
or fl
agsh
ip
prog
ram
1. Id
entif
y an
d es
tabl
ish
a po
ssib
le
rost
er o
f qua
lified
/su
itabl
e Afr
ican
sp
ecia
lists
who
can
pa
rtici
pate
in th
e im
plem
enta
tion
2. O
rgan
ize
shor
t or
ient
atio
n tra
inin
g on
th
e ob
ject
ives
3. D
esig
n an
d pr
ovid
e re
fres
her t
rain
ing
on
the
soft,
com
posi
te,
sand
tran
sfor
mat
ive
capa
city
dim
ensi
ons
to a
chie
ve th
e go
als
4. B
uild
in a
sens
e of
urg
ency
-driv
en
mon
itorin
g an
d tra
ckin
g of
the
impl
emen
tatio
n pr
ogre
ss, a
s wel
l as
for r
isk
and
chal
leng
es
man
agem
ent (c
ontin
ued)
50
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Flag
ship
pr
ogra
ms
(in fi
rst 1
0-ye
ar p
lan)
CT
S pr
ofes
sion
als
requ
ired
fo
r fla
gshi
p pr
ogra
ms
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of C
TS
prof
essi
onal
sC
ompo
site
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng o
f co
mpo
site
ca
paci
ties
Soft
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of so
ft
capa
citie
s
Cha
nge
and
tran
sfor
mat
ive
capa
citie
s req
uire
d
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of c
hang
e an
d tr
ans.
capa
citie
sPr
opos
ed C
D
inte
rven
tion
4.
Esta
blis
h an
Ann
ual
Afr
ican
Fo
rum
Not
ap
plic
able
AU
CM
embe
r St
ates
REC
sC
SOs
Org
aniz
atio
nal a
nd
coor
dina
tion
capa
bilit
yC
ritic
al/s
trate
gic
thin
king
and
resu
lts-
base
d m
anag
emen
tSt
akeh
olde
r/pa
rtner
ship
-bui
ldin
g ab
ilitie
sFa
cilit
ate
the
proc
esse
s an
d th
e or
gani
zatio
nal
skill
s (in
clud
ing
“fun
ctio
nal”
cap
aciti
es)
Prog
ram
dev
elop
men
tA
bilit
y to
neg
otia
te a
nd
be p
ersu
asiv
e
Priv
ate
sect
orK
ey a
genc
ies
(AfD
B, E
CA
, an
d so
on)
Abi
lity
to w
ork
as a
te
am/c
omm
itmen
tPa
n-A
fric
an sp
irit a
nd
valu
esSt
rong
com
mitm
ent a
t th
e le
ader
ship
leve
lR
esul
ts o
rient
atio
n (r
esul
ts-d
riven
)A
ccou
ntab
ility
(for
re
sults
and
effi
cien
cy)
Trus
tPr
oble
m-s
olvi
ng sk
ills
Dili
genc
e an
d th
orou
ghne
ssA
bilit
y to
han
dle
a he
avy
wor
kloa
d/ha
rdw
orki
ng a
ttitu
dePa
n-A
fric
an sp
irit a
nd
valu
es
Indi
vidu
als/
inst
itutio
ns
that
will
hav
e be
en c
aref
ully
sc
reen
ed
for t
hese
ca
paci
ties
befo
re th
ey
beco
me
invo
lved
Peop
le m
otiv
ated
to
war
d a
shar
ed/
insp
iratio
nal v
isio
nPo
litic
al w
illTo
p le
ader
ship
an
d m
anag
emen
t op
timis
m/c
omm
itmen
tO
wne
rshi
p of
de
cisi
on-m
akin
gR
isk
man
agem
ent
abili
ties
Cha
nge
read
ines
s:
crea
te a
nd m
aint
ain
the
desi
re fo
r cha
nge
Abi
lity
to sw
itch
min
d-se
ts
To sc
reen
in
divi
dual
s/In
stitu
tions
ca
refu
lly,
in se
arch
of
thes
e at
titud
inal
/pr
edis
posi
tion
capa
citie
s be
fore
they
be
com
e in
volv
ed/h
old
key
role
s in
this
maj
or
flags
hip
prog
ram
1. Id
entif
y an
d es
tabl
ish
a po
ssib
le
rost
er o
f qua
lified
/su
itabl
e Afr
ican
sp
ecia
lists
who
can
pa
rtici
pate
in th
e im
plem
enta
tion
2. O
rgan
ize
shor
t or
ient
atio
n tra
inin
g on
th
e ob
ject
ives
3. D
esig
n an
d pr
ovid
e re
fres
her t
rain
ing
on
the
soft,
com
posi
te,
and
trans
form
ativ
e ca
paci
ty d
imen
sion
s to
ach
ieve
the
goal
s4.
Bui
ld in
a
sens
e of
urg
ency
-dr
iven
mon
itorin
g an
d tra
ckin
g of
im
plem
enta
tion
prog
ress
, as w
ell a
s fo
r ris
k an
d ch
alle
nges
m
anag
emen
t
Tab
le 7
.1 In
dic
ativ
e ca
pac
itie
s re
qu
ired
for
flag
ship
pro
gra
ms
of t
he
firs
t 10-
year
pla
n (c
ontin
ued)
51
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLANFl
agsh
ip
prog
ram
s (in
firs
t 10-
year
pla
n)
CT
S pr
ofes
sion
als
requ
ired
fo
r fla
gshi
p pr
ogra
ms
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of C
TS
prof
essi
onal
sC
ompo
site
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng o
f co
mpo
site
ca
paci
ties
Soft
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of so
ft
capa
citie
s
Cha
nge
and
tran
sfor
mat
ive
capa
citie
s req
uire
d
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of c
hang
e an
d tr
ans.
capa
citie
sPr
opos
ed C
D
inte
rven
tion
5.
Esta
blis
h th
e C
ontin
enta
l Fr
ee T
rade
A
rea
by 2
017
Fina
ncia
l In
vest
men
t A
dvis
ors/
expe
rtsIn
tra-A
fric
an
trade
sp
ecia
lists
Econ
omis
tsFr
ee tr
ade
spec
ialis
tsR
egio
nal
inte
grat
ion
spec
ialis
tsLo
gist
ical
/fr
eigh
t ex
perts
Act
uarie
s and
ris
k as
sess
ors
AU
CM
embe
r St
ates
REC
sPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Afr
ican
di
aspo
raC
SOs
Stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ngC
ritic
al/s
trate
gic
thin
king
and
resu
lts-
base
d m
anag
emen
tLe
vera
ge a
sset
sR
isk
man
agem
ent a
nd
miti
gatio
n an
d th
e ab
ility
to d
eal w
ith
bum
ps in
the
road
Org
aniz
atio
nal a
nd
coor
dina
tion
capa
bilit
yFa
cilit
ate
the
proc
esse
s an
d th
e or
gani
zatio
nal
skill
s (in
clud
ing
“fun
ctio
nal”
cap
aciti
es)
Stak
ehol
der/
partn
ersh
ip-b
uild
ing
abili
ties
Dev
elop
pro
gram
sPl
an a
nd im
plem
ent
proj
ects
Fina
nce
owne
rshi
p an
d D
RM
Abi
lity
to n
egot
iate
and
be
per
suas
ive
Priv
ate
sect
orK
ey a
genc
ies
(AfD
B, E
CA
, et
c.)
Stro
ng c
omm
itmen
t at
the
lead
ersh
ip le
vel
Com
mitm
ent t
o de
velo
pmen
t out
com
esPr
oact
ive
appr
oach
Res
ults
orie
ntat
ion
(res
ults
-driv
en)
Acc
ount
abili
ty (f
or
resu
lts a
nd e
ffici
ency
)C
ontin
uous
hig
h le
vel
of e
nerg
y/co
mm
itmen
tA
bilit
y to
wor
k as
a
team
/com
mitm
ent
Trus
tPr
oble
m-s
olvi
ng sk
ills
Dili
genc
e an
d th
orou
ghne
ssSp
eed
and
urge
ncy
for
wor
k/ac
hiev
emen
tH
igh
ener
gy a
nd d
rive
Abi
lity
to h
andl
e a
heav
y w
orkl
oad
/ha
rdw
orki
ng a
ttitu
dePa
n-A
fric
an sp
irit a
nd
valu
es
Indi
vidu
als/
inst
itutio
ns
that
will
hav
e be
en c
aref
ully
sc
reen
ed
for t
hese
ca
paci
ties
befo
re th
ey
beco
me
invo
lved
Tran
sfor
mat
ive
lead
ersh
ip (i
nclu
ding
vi
sion
ing)
Top
lead
ersh
ip
and
man
agem
ent
optim
ism
/com
mitm
ent
Ow
ners
hip
of
deci
sion
-mak
ing
ICT
and
tech
nolo
gica
l pr
edis
posi
tion
Inno
vatio
n an
d in
vent
ion
com
mitm
ent
Ris
k m
anag
emen
t ab
ilitie
sPe
ople
mot
ivat
ed
tow
ard
a sh
ared
/in
spira
tiona
l vis
ion
Cha
nge
read
ines
s:
crea
te a
nd m
aint
ain
the
desi
re fo
r cha
nge
Abi
lity
for s
hifts
in
min
d-se
t
1. Id
entif
y an
d es
tabl
ish
a po
ssib
le
rost
er o
f qua
lified
/su
itabl
e Afr
ican
sp
ecia
lists
who
can
pa
rtici
pate
in th
e im
plem
enta
tion
2. O
rgan
ize
shor
t or
ient
atio
n tra
inin
g on
th
e ob
ject
ives
3. D
esig
n an
d pr
ovid
e re
fres
her t
rain
ing
on
the
soft,
com
posi
te,
and
trans
form
ativ
e ca
paci
ty d
imen
sion
s to
ach
ieve
the
goal
s4.
Bui
ld in
a
sens
e of
urg
ency
-dr
iven
mon
itorin
g an
d tra
ckin
g of
im
plem
enta
tion
prog
ress
, as w
ell a
s fo
r ris
k an
d ch
alle
nges
m
anag
emen
t (con
tinue
d)
52
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Flag
ship
pr
ogra
ms
(in fi
rst 1
0-ye
ar p
lan)
CT
S pr
ofes
sion
als
requ
ired
fo
r fla
gshi
p pr
ogra
ms
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of C
TS
prof
essi
onal
sC
ompo
site
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng o
f co
mpo
site
ca
paci
ties
Soft
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of so
ft
capa
citie
s
Cha
nge
and
tran
sfor
mat
ive
capa
citie
s req
uire
d
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of c
hang
e an
d tr
ans.
capa
citie
sPr
opos
ed C
D
inte
rven
tion
6.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Gra
nd
Inga
Dam
Pr
ojec
t
Wat
er
spec
ialis
ts/
Hyd
rolo
gist
sC
hem
ical
En
gine
ers
Proj
ect
man
ager
sC
hem
ical
En
gine
er/
Tech
nolo
gist
Wat
er
reso
urce
sc
ient
ists
Irrig
atio
n sp
ecia
lists
Dam
co
nstru
ctio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t sp
ecia
lists
Aqu
atic
Sc
ient
ist
Mar
ine
Bio
-sc
ient
ist
Geo
logi
sts
Toxi
colo
gist
s
Mem
ber
Stat
esPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Aca
dem
iaC
TS
prof
essi
onal
bo
dies
Afr
ican
CTS
di
aspo
ra (i
n C
hina
, Ind
ia,
and
the
Wes
t)
Stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ngD
evel
op p
rogr
ams
Plan
and
impl
emen
t pr
ojec
tsSt
akeh
olde
r/pa
rtner
ship
-bui
ldin
g ab
ilitie
sO
rgan
izat
iona
l and
co
ordi
natio
n ca
pabi
lity
Crit
ical
/stra
tegi
c th
inki
ng a
nd re
sults
-ba
sed
man
agem
ent
Proc
ess f
acili
atio
n an
d or
gani
zatio
nal s
kills
(in
clud
ing
“fun
ctio
nal”
ca
paci
ties)
Crit
ical
supp
ort
syst
ems a
nd p
roce
sses
, in
clud
ing
the
use
of te
chno
logy
and
in
nova
tion
Fina
nce
owne
rshi
p an
d D
RM
Kno
wle
dge
syst
ems
to sp
eed
up p
roje
ct
impl
emen
tatio
nR
isk
man
agem
ent a
nd
miti
gatio
n an
d th
e ab
ility
to d
eal w
ith
bum
ps in
the
road
Leve
rage
ass
ets
Abi
lity
to n
egot
iate
and
be
per
suas
ive
AU
CPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Key
age
ncie
s (A
fDB
, EC
A,
and
so o
n)
Com
mitm
ent t
o de
velo
pmen
t of
outc
omes
Hig
h en
ergy
and
driv
ePa
n-A
fric
an sp
irit a
nd
valu
esSt
rong
com
mitm
ent a
t th
e le
ader
ship
leve
lPr
oact
ive
appr
oach
Res
ults
orie
ntat
ion
(res
ults
-driv
en)
Acc
ount
abili
ty (f
or
resu
lts a
nd e
ffici
ency
)C
ontin
uous
hig
h le
vel
of e
nerg
y/co
mm
itmen
tA
bilit
y to
wor
k as
a
team
/com
mitm
ent
Trus
tPr
oble
m-s
olvi
ng sk
ills
Dili
genc
e an
d th
orou
ghne
ssSp
eed
and
urge
ncy
for
wor
k/ac
hiev
emen
tA
bilit
y to
han
dle
a he
avy
wor
kloa
d/ha
rdw
orki
ng a
ttitu
de
Indi
vidu
als/
inst
itutio
ns
that
will
hav
e be
en c
aref
ully
sc
reen
ed
for t
hese
ca
paci
ties
befo
re th
ey
beco
me
invo
lved
Tran
sfor
mat
ive
lead
ersh
ip (i
nclu
ding
vi
sion
ing)
Top
lead
ersh
ip
and
man
agem
ent
optim
ism
/com
mitm
ent
Ow
ners
hip
of
deci
sion
-mak
ing
ICT
and
tech
nolo
gica
l pr
edis
posi
tion
Inno
vatio
n an
d in
vent
ion
com
mitm
ent
Ris
k m
anag
emen
t ab
ilitie
sPe
ople
mot
ivat
ed
tow
ard
a sh
ared
/in
spira
tiona
l vis
ion
Cha
nge
read
ines
s:
crea
te a
nd m
aint
ain
the
desi
re fo
r cha
nge
Abi
lity
to sh
ift m
ind-
sets
To sc
reen
in
divi
dual
s/in
stitu
tions
ca
refu
lly,
in se
arch
of
thes
e at
titud
inal
/pr
edis
posi
tion
capa
citie
s be
fore
they
be
com
e in
volv
ed/h
old
key
role
s in
this
maj
or
flags
hip
prog
ram
1. Id
entif
y an
d es
tabl
ish
a po
ssib
le
rost
er o
f qua
lified
/su
itabl
e Afr
ican
sp
ecia
lists
who
can
pa
rtici
pate
in th
e im
plem
enta
tion
2. O
rgan
ize
shor
t or
ient
atio
n tra
inin
g on
th
e ob
ject
ives
3. D
esig
n an
d pr
ovid
e re
fres
her t
rain
ing
on
the
soft,
com
posi
te,
and
trans
form
ativ
e ca
paci
ty d
imen
sion
s to
ach
ieve
the
goal
s4.
Bui
ld in
a
sens
e of
urg
ency
-dr
iven
mon
itorin
g an
d tra
ckin
g on
im
plem
enta
tion
prog
ress
, as w
ell a
s fo
r ris
k an
d ch
alle
nges
m
anag
emen
t
Tab
le 7
.1 In
dic
ativ
e ca
pac
itie
s re
qu
ired
for
flag
ship
pro
gra
ms
of t
he
firs
t 10-
year
pla
n (c
ontin
ued)
53
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLANFl
agsh
ip
prog
ram
s (in
firs
t 10-
year
pla
n)
CT
S pr
ofes
sion
als
requ
ired
fo
r fla
gshi
p pr
ogra
ms
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of C
TS
prof
essi
onal
sC
ompo
site
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng o
f co
mpo
site
ca
paci
ties
Soft
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of so
ft
capa
citie
s
Cha
nge
and
tran
sfor
mat
ive
capa
citie
s req
uire
d
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of c
hang
e an
d tr
ans.
capa
citie
sPr
opos
ed C
D
inte
rven
tion
7.
The
Pa
n-A
fric
an
E-N
etw
ork
Net
wor
k C
ontro
llers
Inte
grat
ed
Dev
elop
ers
(Jav
a, P
erl,
PHP)
ICT
spec
ialis
tsSy
stem
s en
gine
ers
IT S
ecur
ity
spec
ialis
tsTe
leco
m-
mun
icat
ions
en
gine
ers/
spec
ialis
ts
AU
CPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Yout
hA
fric
an
dias
pora
Crit
ical
/stra
tegi
c th
inki
ng a
nd re
sults
-ba
sed
man
agem
ent
Org
aniz
atio
nal a
nd
coor
dina
tion
capa
bilit
yPr
oces
s fac
ilita
tion
and
orga
niza
tiona
l ski
lls
(incl
udin
g “f
unct
iona
l”
capa
citie
s)St
akeh
olde
r/pa
rtner
ship
-bui
ldin
g ab
ilitie
sC
ritic
al su
ppor
t sy
stem
s and
pro
cess
es,
incl
udin
g th
e us
e of
tech
nolo
gy a
nd
inno
vatio
nD
evel
op p
rogr
ams
Plan
and
impl
emen
t pr
ojec
tsFi
nanc
e ow
ners
hip
and
DR
MK
now
ledg
e sy
stem
s to
spee
d up
pro
ject
im
plem
enta
tion
Ris
k m
anag
emen
t and
m
itiga
tion
and
the
abili
ty to
dea
l with
bu
mps
in th
e ro
adLe
vera
ge a
sset
sA
bilit
y to
neg
otia
te a
nd
be p
ersu
asiv
e
AU
CPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Con
tinen
tal
yout
h or
gani
zatio
ns
Com
mitm
ent t
o de
velo
pmen
t out
com
esPr
oact
ive
appr
oach
Res
ult o
rient
atio
n (r
esul
ts-d
riven
)A
ccou
ntab
ility
(for
re
sults
and
effi
cien
cy)
Con
tinuo
us h
igh
leve
l of
ene
rgy/
com
mitm
ent
Abi
lity
to w
ork
as a
te
am/c
omm
itmen
tTr
ust
Prob
lem
-sol
ving
skill
sD
ilige
nce
and
thor
ough
ness
Hig
h en
ergy
and
driv
eA
bilit
y to
han
dle
a he
avy
wor
kloa
d/ha
rdw
orki
ng a
ttitu
dePa
n-A
fric
an sp
irit a
nd
valu
es
Indi
vidu
als/
inst
itutio
ns
that
will
hav
e be
en c
aref
ully
sc
reen
ed
for t
hese
ca
paci
ties
befo
re th
ey
beco
me
invo
lved
Inno
vatio
n an
d in
vent
ion
com
mitm
ent
ICT
and
tech
nolo
gica
l pr
edis
posi
tion
Tran
sfor
mat
ive
lead
ersh
ip (i
nclu
ding
vi
sion
ing)
Top
lead
ersh
ip
and
man
agem
ent
optim
ism
/com
mitm
ent
Ow
ners
hip
of
deci
sion
-mak
ing
Ris
k m
anag
emen
t ab
ilitie
sPe
ople
mot
ivat
ed
tow
ard
a sh
ared
/in
spira
tiona
l vis
ion
Cha
nge
read
ines
s:
crea
te a
nd m
aint
ain
the
desi
re fo
r cha
nge
Abi
lity
to sh
ift m
ind-
sets
1. Id
entif
y an
d es
tabl
ish
a po
ssib
le
rost
er o
f qua
lified
/su
itabl
e Afr
ican
sp
ecia
lists
who
ca
n be
use
d in
im
plem
enta
tion
2. O
rgan
ize
shor
t or
ient
atio
n tra
inin
g on
th
e ob
ject
ives
3. D
esig
n an
d pr
ovid
e re
fres
her t
rain
ing
on
the
com
posi
te, s
oft,
and
trans
form
ativ
e ca
paci
ty d
imen
sion
s to
ach
ieve
the
goal
s4.
Bui
ld in
a
sens
e of
urg
ency
-dr
iven
mon
itorin
g an
d tra
ckin
g on
im
plem
enta
tion
prog
ress
, as w
ell a
s fo
r ris
k an
d ch
alle
nges
m
anag
emen
t (con
tinue
d)
54
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Flag
ship
pr
ogra
ms
(in fi
rst 1
0-ye
ar p
lan)
CT
S pr
ofes
sion
als
requ
ired
fo
r fla
gshi
p pr
ogra
ms
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of C
TS
prof
essi
onal
sC
ompo
site
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng o
f co
mpo
site
ca
paci
ties
Soft
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of so
ft
capa
citie
s
Cha
nge
and
tran
sfor
mat
ive
capa
citie
s req
uire
d
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of c
hang
e an
d tr
ans.
capa
citie
sPr
opos
ed C
D
inte
rven
tion
8.
Sile
ncin
g th
e G
uns b
y 20
20
Afr
ican
co
nflic
t re
solu
tion
spec
ialis
tsPa
nel o
f wis
e/pe
ace
mak
ers
Peac
e an
d se
curit
y ex
perts
Con
flict
an
d se
curit
y tra
ckin
g sp
ecia
lists
AU
CPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Afr
ican
di
aspo
raA
fric
an
secu
rity
inst
itutio
ns
Dev
elop
pro
gram
sR
isk
man
agem
ent a
nd
miti
gatio
n an
d th
e ab
ility
to d
eal w
ith
bum
ps in
the
road
Crit
ical
supp
ort
syst
ems a
nd p
roce
sses
, in
clud
ing
the
use
of te
chno
logy
and
in
nova
tion
Stak
ehol
der/
partn
ersh
ip-b
uild
ing
abili
ties
Stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ngO
rgan
izat
iona
l and
co
ordi
natio
n ca
pabi
lity
Crit
ical
/stra
tegi
c th
inki
ng a
nd re
sults
-ba
sed
man
agem
ent
Proc
ess f
acili
tatio
n an
d or
gani
zatio
nal s
kills
(in
clud
ing
“fun
ctio
nal”
ca
paci
ties)
Plan
and
impl
emen
t pr
ojec
tsFi
nanc
e ow
ners
hip
and
DR
MK
now
ledg
e sy
stem
s to
spee
d up
pro
ject
im
plem
enta
tion
Abi
lity
to n
egot
iate
and
be
per
suas
ive
AU
CA
UC
in
stitu
tions
(N
EPA
D, P
AP,
an
d so
on)
REC
sPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Key
age
ncie
s (A
fDB
, EC
A,
and
so o
n)
Polit
ical
will
Acc
omm
odat
ive
appr
oach
es to
so
vere
ignt
y w
illin
gnes
s ca
paci
ties
Indi
vidu
als/
inst
itutio
ns
that
will
hav
e be
en c
aref
ully
sc
reen
ed
for t
hese
ca
paci
ties
befo
re th
ey
beco
me
invo
lved
Ris
k m
anag
emen
t ab
ilitie
sTr
ansf
orm
ativ
e le
ader
ship
(inc
ludi
ng
visi
onin
g)To
p le
ader
ship
an
d m
anag
emen
t op
timis
m/c
omm
itmen
tO
wne
rshi
p of
de
cisi
on-m
akin
gPe
ople
mot
ivat
ed
tow
ard
a sh
ared
/in
spira
tiona
l vis
ion
Cha
nge
read
ines
s:
crea
te a
nd m
aint
ain
the
desi
re fo
r cha
nge
1. Id
entif
y an
d es
tabl
ish
a po
ssib
le
rost
er o
f qua
lified
/su
itabl
e Afr
ican
sp
ecia
lists
who
ca
n be
use
d in
im
plem
enta
tion
2. O
rgan
ize
shor
t or
ient
atio
n tra
inin
g on
th
e ob
ject
ives
3. D
esig
n an
d pr
ovid
e re
fres
her t
rain
ing
on
the
com
posi
te, s
oft,
and
trans
form
ativ
e ca
paci
ty d
imen
sion
s to
ach
ieve
the
goal
s4.
Bui
ld in
a
sens
e of
urg
ency
-dr
iven
mon
itorin
g an
d tra
ckin
g on
im
plem
enta
tion
prog
ress
, as w
ell a
s fo
r ris
k an
d ch
alle
nges
m
anag
emen
t
Tab
le 7
.1 In
dic
ativ
e ca
pac
itie
s re
qu
ired
for
flag
ship
pro
gra
ms
of t
he
firs
t 10-
year
pla
n (c
ontin
ued)
55
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLANFl
agsh
ip
prog
ram
s (in
firs
t 10-
year
pla
n)
CT
S pr
ofes
sion
als
requ
ired
fo
r fla
gshi
p pr
ogra
ms
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of C
TS
prof
essi
onal
sC
ompo
site
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng o
f co
mpo
site
ca
paci
ties
Soft
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of so
ft
capa
citie
s
Cha
nge
and
tran
sfor
mat
ive
capa
citie
s req
uire
d
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of c
hang
e an
d tr
ans.
capa
citie
sPr
opos
ed C
D
inte
rven
tion
9.
Afr
ican
O
uter
Spa
ce
Stra
tegy
Ast
rona
uts
Spac
e te
chno
logi
sts
Tech
nolo
gy
and
inno
vatio
n sp
ecia
lists
Phys
icis
tsSa
telli
te
posit
ioni
ng a
nd
info
rmat
ion
anal
ysis
spec
ialis
ts
AU
CPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Aca
dem
iaC
TS
prof
essi
onal
bo
dies
Afr
ican
CTS
di
aspo
ra (i
n C
hina
, Ind
ia,
and
the
Wes
t)
Stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ngO
rgan
izat
iona
l and
co
ordi
natio
n ca
pabi
lity
Crit
ical
/stra
tegi
c th
inki
ng a
nd re
sults
-ba
sed
man
agem
ent
Proc
ess f
acili
tatio
n an
d or
gani
zatio
nal s
kills
(in
clud
ing
“fun
ctio
nal”
ca
paci
ties)
Crit
ical
supp
ort
syst
ems a
nd p
roce
sses
, in
clud
ing
the
use
of te
chno
logy
and
in
nova
tion
Dev
elop
pro
gram
sPl
an a
nd im
plem
ent
proj
ects
Fina
nce
owne
rshi
p an
d D
RM
Kno
wle
dge
syst
ems
to sp
eed
up p
roje
ct
impl
emen
tatio
nR
isk
man
agem
ent a
nd
miti
gatio
n an
d th
e ab
ility
to d
eal w
ith
bum
ps in
the
road
Leve
rage
ass
ets
Abi
lity
to n
egot
iate
and
be
per
suas
ive
AU
CPr
ivat
e se
ctor
Key
age
ncie
s (A
fDB
, EC
A,
and
so o
n)
Stro
ng c
omm
itmen
t at
the
lead
ersh
ip le
vel
Com
mitm
ent t
o de
velo
pmen
t out
com
esPr
oact
ive
appr
oach
Res
ults
orie
ntat
ion
(res
ults
-driv
en)
Acc
ount
abili
ty (f
or
resu
lts a
nd e
ffici
ency
)C
ontin
uous
hig
h le
vel
of e
nerg
y/co
mm
itmen
tA
bilit
y to
wor
k as
a
team
/com
mitm
ent
Trus
tPr
oble
m-s
olvi
ng sk
ills
Dili
genc
e an
d th
orou
ghne
ssH
igh
ener
gy a
nd d
rive
Abi
lity
to h
andl
e a
heav
y w
orkl
oad/
hard
wor
king
atti
tude
Pan-
Afr
ican
spiri
t and
va
lues
Indi
vidu
als/
inst
itutio
ns
that
will
hav
e be
en c
aref
ully
sc
reen
ed
for t
hese
ca
paci
ties
befo
re th
ey
beco
me
invo
lved
1. Id
entif
y an
d es
tabl
ish
a po
ssib
le
rost
er o
f qua
lified
/su
itabl
e Afr
ican
sp
ecia
lists
who
ca
n be
use
d in
im
plem
enta
tion
2. O
rgan
ize
shor
t or
ient
atio
n tra
inin
g on
th
e ob
ject
ives
3. D
esig
n an
d pr
ovid
e re
fres
her t
rain
ing
on
the
com
posi
te, s
oft,
and
trans
form
ativ
e ca
paci
ty d
imen
sion
s to
ach
ieve
the
goal
s4.
Bui
ld in
a
sens
e of
urg
ency
-dr
iven
mon
itorin
g an
d tra
ckin
g on
im
plem
enta
tion
prog
ress
, as w
ell a
s fo
r ris
k an
d ch
alle
nges
m
anag
emen
t (con
tinue
d)
56
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Flag
ship
pr
ogra
ms
(in fi
rst 1
0-ye
ar p
lan)
CT
S pr
ofes
sion
als
requ
ired
fo
r fla
gshi
p pr
ogra
ms
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of C
TS
prof
essi
onal
sC
ompo
site
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng o
f co
mpo
site
ca
paci
ties
Soft
cap
aciti
es
requ
ired
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of so
ft
capa
citie
s
Cha
nge
and
tran
sfor
mat
ive
capa
citie
s req
uire
d
Prop
osed
so
urci
ng
of c
hang
e an
d tr
ans.
capa
citie
sPr
opos
ed C
D
inte
rven
tion
10.
The A
fric
an
Pass
port
and
the
Free
M
ovem
ent o
f Pe
ople
Not
ap
plic
able
AU
CM
embe
r St
ates
APR
M
Proc
ess f
acili
tatio
n an
d or
gani
zatio
nal s
kills
(in
clud
ing
“fun
ctio
nal”
ca
paci
ties)
Stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ngO
rgan
izat
iona
l and
co
ordi
natio
n ca
pabi
lity
Crit
ical
/stra
tegi
c th
inki
ng a
nd re
sults
-ba
sed
man
agem
ent
Crit
ical
supp
ort
syst
ems a
nd p
roce
sses
, in
clud
ing
the
use
of te
chno
logy
and
in
nova
tion
Dev
elop
pro
gram
sPl
an a
nd im
plem
ent
proj
ects
Fina
nce
owne
rshi
p an
d D
RM
Kno
wle
dge
syst
ems
to sp
eed
up p
roje
ct
impl
emen
tatio
nR
isk
man
agem
ent a
nd
miti
gatio
n an
d th
e ab
ility
to d
eal w
ith
bum
ps in
the
road
Leve
rage
ass
ets
Abi
lity
to n
egot
iate
and
be
per
suas
ive
AU
CR
ECs
Mem
ber
Stat
es
Pan-
Afr
ican
spiri
t and
va
lues
Stro
ng p
oliti
cal w
ill a
t th
e le
ader
ship
leve
lC
omm
itmen
t to
deve
lopm
ent o
utco
mes
Proa
ctiv
e ap
proa
chR
esul
ts o
rient
atio
n (r
esul
ts-d
riven
)A
ccou
ntab
ility
(for
re
sults
and
effi
cien
cy)
Abi
lity
to w
ork
as a
te
am/c
omm
itmen
tTr
ust
Prob
lem
-sol
ving
skill
sD
ilige
nce
and
thor
ough
ness
Spee
d an
d ur
genc
y fo
r w
ork/
achi
evem
ent
Indi
vidu
als/
inst
itutio
ns
that
will
hav
e be
en c
aref
ully
sc
reen
ed
for t
hese
ca
paci
ties
befo
re th
ey
beco
me
invo
lved
Peop
le m
otiv
ated
to
war
d a
shar
ed/
insp
iratio
nal v
isio
nA
bilit
y fo
r min
d-se
t sh
ifts
Cha
nge
read
ines
s:
crea
te a
nd m
aint
ain
the
desi
re fo
r cha
nge
Tran
sfor
mat
ive
lead
ersh
ip (i
nclu
ding
vi
sion
ing)
Top
lead
ersh
ip
and
man
agem
ent
optim
ism
/com
mitm
ent
Ow
ners
hip
of
deci
sion
-mak
ing
com
mitm
ent
Ris
k-m
anag
emen
t ab
ilitie
s
1. Id
entif
y an
d es
tabl
ish
a po
ssib
le
rost
er o
f qua
lified
/su
itabl
e Afr
ican
sp
ecia
lists
who
ca
n be
use
d in
im
plem
enta
tion
2. O
rgan
ize
shor
t or
ient
atio
n tra
inin
g on
th
e ob
ject
ives
3. D
esig
n an
d pr
ovid
e re
fres
her t
rain
ing
on
the
com
posi
te, s
oft,
and
trans
form
ativ
e ca
paci
ty d
imen
sion
s to
ach
ieve
the
goal
s4.
Bui
ld in
a
sens
e of
urg
ency
-dr
iven
mon
itorin
g an
d tra
ckin
g on
im
plem
enta
tion
prog
ress
, as w
ell a
s fo
r ris
k an
d ch
alle
nges
m
anag
emen
t
Tab
le 7
.1 In
dic
ativ
e ca
pac
itie
s re
qu
ired
for
flag
ship
pro
gra
ms
of t
he
firs
t 10-
year
pla
n (c
ontin
ued)
57
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
8GAPS IN AFRICA’S CRITICAL
TECHNICAL SKILL AREAS: SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Africa and its nations are lagging behind in their depth and availability of CTS and spe-cialists, including those with vocational skills. This short section offers a sample analysis of CTS categories to better underscore the enor-mity of the endeavor that is Agenda 2063. (A more comprehensive analysis is in the docu-ment African Critical Technical Skills: Key Capacity Dimensions Needed for the First 10 Years of Agenda 2063).
The total population of the few countries here is smaller than Africa’s, but they are far ahead of the rest of the continent in the level and availability of CTS and specialists. The im-perfections of the analysis below — especially the small base of countries — underscore Afri-ca’s data challenge.
Engineers
Numbers in selected African countries. The estimated number of engineers in Kenya is 7,221, in Tanzania, 2,614, in Malawi, 300,4 and in Rwanda, 175,5 so there is an average of approximately 2,576 engineers in these countries. As many countries in Africa are still “least developed,” one can assume that their average is even lower. Optimistically, it may be that the average of engineers in just Malawi, Rwanda, and Tanzania — around 1,029 — reflects the average of most African countries (except for those with far smaller populations). So, using this average, one
could put the total number of engineers in Af-rica at 55,602, for a ratio of 0.0476 engineers per 1,000 people.
But a good proportion of these engineers are lost every year to other continents, mainly Europe and America. For example, up to 300 qualified engineers leave South Africa every year, according to the Engineering Council of South Africa, leaving the country with fewer than three civil engineers per 100,000 people and depriving 79 of the country’s 231 local municipalities of all their civil engineers, technologists, and technicians.
Comparison with other developing countries. With a population of 200.4 million, Brazil has some 750,000 engineers, for a ratio of 3.75 engineers per 1,000 people — almost 100 times as many per 1,000 people as Tanzania. Tanzania, with a population of 50,710,7986 and 2,614 engineers, has a ratio of only 0.051 engineers per 1,000 people, or a shortfall of (at a ratio of 3.698 per 1,000 people) 187,554 engineers.
Kenya has an equivalent shortfall of 166,924 engineers. (This is based on a population of 46,445,079 and 7,221 engineers, for a ratio of 0.155 engineers per 1,000 people, or 3.594 engineers per 1,000 people).
For Africa as a whole, with an estimated population of 1,166,239,000 and 55,602 en-gineers, at a ratio of 3.702 for 1,000 people,
58
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
the shortfall in engineers (compared to what Africa ought to have) is 4,317,795.
The current African ratio of 0.107 per 1,000 people is also very low, especially compared to a developing economy such as Venezue-la’s (estimated population of 28 million and 180,000 engineers, for a ratio of 6.428 engi-neers per 1,000 people). Using this country as a benchmark, Africa has a shortfall of 6.380 engineers per 1,000 people.
Targets for 2023. The Tanzanian popula-tion of 50,710,798 is forecast to reach about 57 million by 2023. Its current shortage of en-gineers is 3.698 per 1,000 people, which will rise to 4.157 engineers by 2023 based on cur-rent trends. For Tanzania to bridge this gap, it will have to produce a minimum of 236,961 additional engineers — an average of 33,852 every year for the next seven years.
By 2023, the current African population of 1.166 billion is estimated to reach 1.3 billion. The current Africa-wide shortage of engineers is about 3.702 per 1,000 people, a gap that will grow to 4.126 in seven years. To close that gap, Africa has to produce a minimum of 5,365,013 additional engineers — 766,431 a year. To be at Venezuela’s current level (7.112 engineers per 1,000 people) by 2023, it will have to invest heavily in producing engineers, for a minimum of 9,245,855–1,320,837 a year.
Medical doctors and specialists
Current situation. Africa is also lagging in its numbers of medical doctors and specialists. According to World Bank statistics, Africa has an average ratio of 0.307 physicians (medical doctors) per 1,000 people, or a mere 358,035 for nearly 1.2 billion people.
Comparison with other developing coun-tries. That number is very low compared to,
for example, Brazil, which for its roughly 200 million people has 378,756 physicians, at an estimated ratio of 1.89 per 1,000 people. That leaves a gap with Africa of 1.583 medical doctors per 1,000 people, or 20,721 doctors.
Targets for 2023. By 2023, the African pop-ulation is estimated to reach 1.3 billion. To reach Brazil’s current level, Africa will have to invest significantly in training doctors, too — a minimum of 23,098, or 3,211 per year.
Here are three developed countries with their populations and number of doctors per 1,000 people:
• Canada: 34,419,000 and 2.07.
• United Kingdom: 60,566,000 and 2.79.
• United States: 321,225,000 and 2.45.
This yields a ratio of 7.31 for a combined pop-ulation of 416,210,000, or a shortfall in Africa (population nearing 1.2 billion) of 8,167,172 medical doctors, at 7.003 doctors per 1,000 people. To close this gap, Africa has the mam-moth task of training an additional 9,103,900 physicians — 1,300,557 a year — which will be borne by the AUC, RECs, Member States, and stakeholder groups, among others.
Researchers and STEM specialists
Another yawning gap that Africa has to bridge is in the STEM sector. African research is dominated by Algeria, Egypt, Kenya, Nige-ria, and South Africa. During 2003–2012, all three sub-Saharan African regions doubled their annual research output and increased its quality, raising Sub- Saharan Africa’s share of global research from 0.44 percent to 0.72 per-cent over the decade. Still, since Africa has 12 percent of the global population, a consid-erable gap remains.
59
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
In Sub- Saharan Africa, research in the phys-ical sciences and STEM makes up only 29 percent of all research, compared to an av-erage of 68 percent in Malaysia and Vietnam.
Sub- Saharan Africa relies on overseas col-laboration and visiting academics for a steep share of its research output. Some 40–80 per-cent of its science and technology innovation publications are with external partners. The majority of those are in fields, such as health and agriculture, of most interest to interna-tional donors, to the neglect of areas, such as engineering (as above), needed to en-able Africa to develop fundamental STEM research — despite decades of extractive re-source activity. Donors’ heavy influence also dissuades Africa from looking within its own research communities. Sub- Saharan Africa collaborates by far the most with international partners; inter-African collaborations are just 2 percent, 2.9 percent, and 0.9 percent of all East African, Southern African, and West and Central African output.7
The continent remains far from the target set by the Lagos Plan of Action and AU 2007 ini-tiative calling on African countries to allocate
1 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) to science. With Africa’s combined GDP at approximately $2.6 trillion, the amount that could be allocated to science is $200 billion.
African countries can no longer afford to depend only on external sources to finance their basic research. African governments and the private sector should make a firm com-mitment to invest in STEM and innovations. This is vital for the continent to participate in the global knowledge economy and cultivate local capacity, including among youth and women.
Three other critical skill areas
The following figures paint a similar picture for mining specialists and engineers, geolo-gists, and quantity surveyors.
These data underscore Africa’s enormous CTS challenge for Agenda 2063. To deliver on the flagship projects, it must make concert-ed efforts urgently to bridge the CTS chasm between what Africa has and what it ought to have.
Figure 8.1 Mining specialists and engineers
0
2,500
5,000
7,500
United StatesNigeria South Africa
Average for Africa
Number of mining specialists and engineers
Source: Compiled by ACBF Capacity Team.
60
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
Figure 8.2 Geologists
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
CanadaKenyaSouth AfricaMalaysia
Number of geologists
Average for Africa
Source: Compiled by ACBF Capacity Team.
Figure 8.3 Quantity surveyors
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
Hong KongKenyaNigeria
Number of quantity surveyors
Average for Africa
Source: Compiled by ACBF Capacity Team.
61
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
NOTES
1. The crucial dimension 1 in Capacity Require-ments for the New African Vision; and see proposal 5.
2. See Chapter 4 of Capacity Requirements for the New African Vision.
3. AU and NEPAD (2012).
4. Nyasa Times (2011).
5. Institution of Engineers Rwanda (2015).
6. Tanzania’s population as of January 2015.
7. Khumbah (2015).
62
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK: BUTTRESSING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIRST 10-YEAR PLAN
REFERENCES
AU (African Union) and NEPAD Agency (New Part-nership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating Agency). 2012. Africa’s Capacity Development Strategic Framework. Midrand, South Africa: NEPAD Agency.
Institution of Engineers Rwanda. 2015. List of Ap-proved Engineers. http://www.engineersrwanda .org/list.php (accessed October 30, 2015)
Khumbah, N. 2015. “STEM Education and African De-velopment.” Pan African Visions. November 4. http://panafricanvisions.com/2015/stem -education-and-african-development/
Nyasa Times. 2011. “Malawi engineers body elect Mtumbuka as president.” Nyasa Times. August 29. http://www.nyasatimes.com/2011/08/29/malawi -engineers-body-elect-mtumbuka-as-president/ (accessed October 10, 2015).
Ca
pa
city D
ev
elo
pm
en
t Pla
n F
ra
me
wo
rk
2 Fairbairn Drive, Mount PleasantHarare, Zimbabwe
Tel: (+263-4) 304663, 304622, 332002, 332014Cell: +263 772 185 308 - 10Fax: (+263-4) 792894, 702915,E-mail: [email protected] site: www.acbf-pact.org
ISBN: 978-1-77937-064-8EAN:9781779370648
The June 2015 AU Ministerial Retreat of the Executive Council and the Summit in Johannesburg, South Africa emphasized the importance of the capacity dimensions for delivering on Agenda 2063. The Executive Council proposed that the finalized capacity assessment work should highlight the critical skills needed and the role of universities in providing training.
The work on Capacity Dimensions for Agenda 2063 was initiated by the AUC, with close support of the ACBF, which has produced three documents:
• African Critical Technical Skills: Key Capacity Dimensions Needed for the First 10 Years of Agenda 2063.
• Capacity Requirements for the New African Vision: Agenda 2063 — “The Africa We Want.”
• Capacity Development Plan Framework: Buttressing Implementation of the First 10-Year Plan — “The Africa We Want.”
The preliminary findings and recommendations from the capacity needs assessment were presented to the June 2015 Heads of State and Government Summit. The Summit emphasized the capacity dimensions for Agenda 2063, including:
• Critical, technical, and sector-specific skills and training.
• The importance of developing mechanisms to enhance the role of youth and women as central capacity pillars.
• Mind-set transformation, including setting up multistakeholder groups.
This report proposes multilevel and multistakeholder capacity development plans that identify an initial set of foundational capacity-strengthening activities for the First 10-Year Implementation Plan of Agenda 2063.