aerospace fibers “lessons learned” - nasa · experience determination 1 aerospace fibers...

30
Experience Determination www.nufern.com 1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Upload: others

Post on 23-Sep-2019

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com1

Aerospace Fibers“Lessons Learned”

M.F.SeifertOctober ‘05

Page 2: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com2

Our Mission

Nufern designs, manufactures, sells, and supports lot-controlled specialty fibers, optical fiber laser and amplifier products for leading

edge technology applications.

Page 3: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com3

Nufern Advantage: Better Fiber Performance

• Telcordia GR 20 type testing:• High strength, near theoretical

limit.• High fatigue failure resistance.

Best in the world.• Enable the highest power

integral fiber lasers to date.

• Cost 218 Model indicates 107 year life expectancy.

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

-9.0 -7.0 -5.0 -3.0 -1.0

Logarithm of Stress Rate[ln(GPa/s)]

Lo

gar

ith

m o

f F

ailu

re

Str

ess[

ln(G

Pa)

]

Slope 0.0324714SEE 0.0032918

nd 29.80nd+95 37.63nd-95 24.60

1

10

100

100 1000Failure Stress (kpsi)

Failu

re P

roba

bilit

y (%

)

Forbidden Zone

750 kpsi

Page 4: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com4

Custom Clean / Lean Manufacturing Space(Designed for lowest cost, highest yield, in mid volumes)

FiberProduct

Flow

Full TelcordiaQualificationLab

Class 100Draw Facility

Page 5: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com5

Aerospace Fibers• Difficult Application:

– High and wide temperature range.– No emissions wanted in spite of operation in “near vacuum”.– Resistance to radiation of all types and magnitudes.– Resistance to chemicals; ie salt water and organic solvents.– High resistance to, and near zero emissions when burned.– Tolerance for high cyclical stress, shock and vibration.– Tolerance to unfavorable installation techniques.

• Need to be connectorized for maintenance purposes.– Fusion splicing & recoating fiber on an aerospace vehicle is

impractical.

Page 6: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com6

Aerospace Fiber Solutions• Waveguide:

– Multimode (graded and stepped index) used to maximize core diameter and coupling efficiency.

– 50/125µ, 100/140µ, 200µ PCS, etc.• Coating materials:

– Polyimide– Silicone– Acrylate

• Cable structures:– Loose Tube (or semi loose tube)– Tight buffer

AerospaceCable

Fiber

Page 7: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com7

Waveguide design• Early systems had low brightness Tx devices.• Early systems had low bandwidth and insensitive Rx devices.• Couplers were retrofit into existing electrical connector designs.• This dictated:

– Large cores ~ 200µm for maximum target area. – Highest NA ~ 0.375 for maximum light capture.– Custom connectors were developed and implemented.– Low bandwidth. (Max 10MHz/km)

• The large core polymer clad designs were unreliable.• The telecom industry has generated a great deal of standard

125µm robust low cost, high bandwidth connector hardware.– Cost / benefit analysis suggests a move in this direction.

core

cladding

coating

Page 8: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com8

Waveguide Issues• Large core fibers ~ 200µ have inadequate BW for today’s

needs. (< 10MHz km)• Thin Polymer Clad Fibers (PCS, HCS, etc.) suffer from long

term reliability issues, particularly if delivering power. • Crimp & Cleave terminations for PCS fibers exhibit high

variability and reduce available BW.• Installation & service methodologies designed to minimize

microbend stress on fiber are not followed.• Maintenance of large diameter FC (face contact) connectors is

tedious and not followed.• Some designs suffered premature failure. (Carbon coatings

prone to ESD failures)

Page 9: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com9

Hard “Polymer Clad” Fiber Defects

Result: Almost all current systems use glass clad fibers

Hard thin (<5µM)cladding tends to delaminatefrom the glass.It requires a “permanently shrinking”coating (Tefzel™)to stay intact.

Extruded Tefzel™on thin claddeposits hardcontaminantsinto the claddingcausing point sourcesof failure

Delamination Contamination

Page 10: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com10

All Glass Waveguide Trade OffRelative Bandwidth

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1.0% 1.1% 1.2% 1.3% 1.4% 1.5% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 2.0%

Index ∆ (%)

Rel

ativ

e B

and

wid

th (

w.r

.t. 1

.8%

∆) Relative Bandwidth

Microbend loss for various multimode fibers

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1.0% 1.1% 1.2% 1.3% 1.4% 1.5% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 2.0%

Index ∆ (%)

Rel

ativ

e M

icro

ben

din

g L

oss

(w.r

.t. 6

2.5/

125/

1.8%

) 50 12562.5 125100 140

50/125µ0.22 NA

62.5/125µ0.275 NA

100/140µ0.29NA

100/140µ

• Core Ø & NA => Bandwidth & Bend sensitivity• Core Ø / Clad Ø ratio => Bend sensitivity

50/125µ 62.5/125µ

Micro bend Loss Relative Bandwidth

Page 11: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com11

“Ultimate” aerospace waveguide…

• Glass core & Glass cladding structure (reliability).• Smallest core (maximum bandwidth)• Highest possible Core Ø/Clad Ø ratio (bend

insensitivity)• Largest possible NA (highest tolerance to connector

misalignment)• 125µ outside diameter to utilize telecom hardware.

(minimize cost, maximize connector selection)

Page 12: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com12

High Inherent Radiation Tolerant Fibers

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0.E+00 1.E+05 2.E+05 3.E+05 4.E+05 5.E+05

Radiation Dose (Rad)

Ind

uce

d A

tten

uat

ion

(dB

/km

)

Radiation: ProtonWavelength: 1310 nmFlux: 1.1x108 Protons/cm2/sFluence: 1.47x1012 Protons/cm2

Dose Rate (Gamma): 33 Rad/sTotal Dose: 500 kRadTemperature 27oC

Nufern PM1300G-80 Radiation Sensitivity 0.102 dB/km-kRad

Data:Light IonRadiation LabBerkley CAJoe Frieble

Panda construction

Page 13: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com13

Fiber Lasers (Amplifiers)

(core Ø / clad Ø)1MW -

100kW -

10kW -

1kW -

100W -

10W -M2 = 1 M2 = 10

BPP 1µ? , FL 1

LFM 49/250200/600

LMA 25/250

LMA 15/130

20/400LMA 22/400/480

SM 10/200

SM 5/125 (classical telecom fiber)

CW regime

pulsed regime

Flat mode pulsed regime

Ganged Fibers-Few LMA-Many SM

Page 14: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com14

Coating Design

• Fiber coating serves two functions:– Protect fiber from chemical attack. (Water most prevalent)

– Protect fiber from microbend stresses.

• Many materials and combinations have been tried.• Full qualification is expensive and time consuming,

as a result some fiber coatings that are essentially experimental have made it into flight hardware because of need and time constraints.

Page 15: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com15

Acrylate Coatings• Were developed for the telecom industry 20 years ago.

– New materials with OI temperatures of > 200ºC are rated from -55ºC to +125ºC with excursions to +180ºC for several 10s of hours.

– Old acrylates (pre 2002) were maximum rated for –5ºC to +85ºC.– Typically applied as a dual coating, the inner a soft high RI material to protect

from microbend forces and absorb leaked core light. The outer layer is hard to provide abrasion resistance and minimize friction.

• Do not perform well when attacked by common organic solvents, and in extreme thermal environments.

• Have proven themselves durable and practical when used as designed.– Provide excellent protection from nicks, bends and moisture.– Are easily stripped clean for termination.– Are telcordia qualified for 22 years service life.– Have an enormous deployment record.

Page 16: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com16

Acrylate Coated Fiber Drawing

Repeatedfor multi –coatapplications

Page 17: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com17

Acrylate (polymer) coatings shrink

Result: Critical applications requiring precision winding or fiberbonding specify thermal post processing.

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Hours at 85C

Sec

ondar

y B

uffe

r Diam

eter

(um

)

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

Prim

ary B

uffe

r Diam

eter

(um

)

Secondary

Primary

~ 1.49 % Primary

~ 1.52 % Primary + Secondary

Page 18: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com18

Acrylate Coating Life Cycle

AsBuilt

After< 5 years

(acc.)

After< 22 years

(acc.)

After1 year(acc.)

After100 Days@ 175° C

(Nearly black,Crumbling)

Test using Nufern HTA using dual coat Acrylate with OI temperature > 200°COrange / Brown color

Page 19: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com19

Silicone Coatings• Provide a good fiber coating for a modestly higher temperature

range. Typically -25º C to +150º C.– Low RI silicones return escaped core light to the cladding so are

preferred in some power delivery applications. – Show good resistance to many common solvents.

• Present known challenges for the fiber manufacturer, the cable assembler, and the ultimate users:– It is very difficult to clean a stripped fiber thoroughly. – Most bonding agents are effectively released by silicones.– Silicone continues to outgas for the life of the application. It therefore

looses mass and volume over time.

• Silicones generally perform as advertised, and have a significant installed base in many harsh environments.

Page 20: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com20

Polyimide Coatings

• Are hard and durable, with high and wide operating temperature ranges. Typically -65º C to ~ +300º C.

• Fibers are coated with multiple thin layers to ~ 20µm.• Contain ~ 4% water by volume when fully cured.• Exhibit low friction so can not be proof tested conventionally.• Are highly tolerant to most solvents.• Are stripped by immersion in hot ( > 100°C) conc. H2SO4.• Most problems with PI fibers are as a result of improper curing

or poor storage & post processing.• Are sometimes used effectively in combination with Carbon

(hermetic) coatings.

Page 21: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com21

Polyimide (PI) Coating Failures

Typical “under curing”(post application reflow)

Typical “blistering”(inadequate cure between coats)

Page 22: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com22

PI Coating Application Guidelines:

• A 20µm coating on fiber takes ~ 1Hr at elevated temperature to fully cure.

• Drawing layers too quickly (inadequate cure) causes subsequent layer bubbling and allows fiber to move.

• Finished fiber must be stored dry.• Fiber requires an elevated temperature drying cycle

prior to cabling. (entrained moisture flashes to steam)• Cable materials must be extremely dry before used in

cable making process.

Page 23: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com23

Proof Testing Polyimide Coatings

Fiber is drawn through sets of fixed wheels of specified diameter to imparta bending (tensile) stress on the outer surface of the fiber.

Fibercrosssection

Fiber is drawn through 4 sets ofWheels, each at 45° from the others

12

3

4

Page 24: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com24

Clever Alternatives to Stripping PI

1. Terminate in custom large diameter ferrules with intact PI coating.

2. Terminate in standard telecom. ferrules with intact PI coating (suffer some bend loss due to core Ø / clad Ø ratio)

• Because PI coating is relatively thin concentricity error and the resulting error in connector alignment can be managed during the coating process.

Page 25: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com25

Micro Bend Loss for 125µ “No Strip” PI

1.0

5.9

0.4

2.5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140

Cladding Diameter (µm)

Rel

ativ

e M

icro

bend

Los

s

50 um, 1% Delta core

62.5 um, 1.8% Delta core

Necessary claddingDiameter to achieve125µ coating diam. With 32µ (16 x 2)PI.

Page 26: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com26

Atomic “Carbon” Coatings• Can provide an effective hermetic seal against

water or H2 gas ingression.• Reduce the raw tensile strength by about 1/5th but

provide a >5X stress corrosion failure (n) rating increase.

• n values in excess of 100 are possible (common).• Carbon is a semiconductor and the resulting fiber

is ESD Sensitive. (NOT USUALLY ANTICIPATED)• Care must be taken to account for ESD sensitivity

during all steps of manufacture & deployment.• Finished products have been shown to be robust.

Page 27: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com27

Carbon Coatings

Polymer coating

Thin (few monolayer) Carbon coating

Waveguide

SEM STM

Page 28: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com28

Aerospace Cable Construction

• Loose Tube– Largest operating

temperature range– Least negative effect in

high transient temperature conditions.

– Difficult to terminate short lengths < 2m. Excess fiber spirals in tube.

– Cable is somewhat bulky and subject to kinking.

• Tight Buffer– Easiest to terminate– Smallest dimensionally so

gives highest bandwidth/size.

– Has difficulty meeting low operating temperature requirements.

Page 29: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com29

Conclusions

• Waveguides have migrated to “all glass” constructions.– Debate continues on “standards”.

• 3 polymers are variously used. Acrylates are increasingly used “in cabin”.– High desire for a strippable polyimide.

• Carbon coatings are falling from favor because of ESD sensitivity.– High desire for a non conductive atomic hermetic coating.

• Both cable constructions are in common use.

Page 30: Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” - NASA · Experience Determination  1 Aerospace Fibers “Lessons Learned” M.F.Seifert October ‘05

Experience Determination www.nufern.com30

Contact

Martin Seifert860.408.5001

[email protected]

7 Airport Park RoadEast Granby, CT 06026

860.408.5000860.408.5080 fax