advt.docx
TRANSCRIPT
7/27/2019 advt.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/advtdocx 1/2
NAME: Mukkamala Pallavi CLASS: MJMC1
In a democracy where people have freedom of speech and expression, why do we need
laws governing commercial speech i.e. advertising? Discuss with argument.
“H.G. Wells, said that advertising was legalized lying”. But one must not forget in world‟s
different constitutions have different laws and every law has certain limitations which gets
suspended under certain circumstances (India- art.19 suspends during emergency) and when
it comes to India – quasi federal state, various amendments have been passed since 1955 with
the intellectual maturity and need of nation.
At first, advertising was excluded from the ambit of the provision, with the Supreme Court
holding in Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India, that while advertisements were a form of
speech, they were not constitutive of the concept of „free speech‟ as it was being guided by
the object of commercial gain. But later, a shift in the constitutional position was evidencedin the case of Tata Press v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. wherein advertising was
observed to be beneficial to consumers as it facilitated the free dissemination of information,
leading to greater public awareness in a free market economy. In the same light, the Supreme
Court reversed the position as adopted in Hamdard Dawakhana, and held advertising to be
constitutive of „commercial speech‟, and therefore brought it within the ambit of
constitutional protection conferred by Art. 19(1)(a).
In an environment of zealous competition in the foreground of a market economy, self
regulation in advertising should be and has been a subject matter of high importance. If such
regulations are not respected and adhered to by all those concerned, it might not be long
before advertising is exploited. Many countries in Europe restrict domestic advertising that
target children below a certain age. In the UK, the Advertising Standards Authority lays
down the standards for advertising in all kinds of media while all outdoor advertising is done
with permission from the local town planning authorities. As for the US, the Federal Trade
Commission is the relevant and the ultimate authority on the subject although local
governments are allowed to enact their own regulations in this regard.
In India, Primarily, matters related to untrue and misleading advertising were adjudicated
upon by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices („MRTP‟) Commission, constituted
under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 („MRTP Act‟) later came
Consumer Protection Act 1986 with the motive of consumer grievances. Further, emulating
the various countries, the Indian marketing and advertising professionals also took the
initiative to set up a council for self regulating the content of advertisements, in the form of
the Advertising Standards Council of India for the stoppage of misleading, untruthful,
indecent or unfair advertisements under certain fundamental principles:
SAFEGUARD AGAINST MISREPRESENTATIONS AND MISLEADING
ADVERTISEMENTS: eg Glindia claimed “Drinking Complain helps one to emerge
as top-ranker”.
7/27/2019 advt.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/advtdocx 2/2
TO ENSURE STANDARDS OF PUBLIC DECENCY: eg -in the advertisement of
„Gel Pen‟ the exposure of women & copy saying „sab kuchh dikhta hai‟
NO PROMOTION OF HAZARDOUS THINGS: eg Bharat Beedi – showing child to
present the brand.
FAIRNESS IN COMPETITON: eg - The advertisements of Pepsi of Coca Cola: Boththe brands try to compare their brands & the series try to cut the features shown in
their advertisements.
RECENT JUDICIAL TRENDS: A more recent dispute has arisen between Procter & Gamble
(„P&G‟) and Hindustan Unilever Ltd („HUL‟), wherein the latter has contended that the latest
advertisement of the former‟s shampoo brand „Pantene‟ is false and misleading in asserting
that the said product was the most preferred one in the Indian market. In addition, it was
alleged that the said campaign was disparaging Unilever‟s brand „Dove‟. The hoardings put
up by P&G towards the end of July 2010 depicted a „mystery shampoo‟ which „„80% women
say is better than anything else.‟‟ P&G‟s move was immediately countered by Unilever,which came out with a parallel campaign of „Dove‟, saying, “There is no myster y. Dove is
the No.1 shampoo‟‟. It later filed a complaint with the Advertising Standards Council of India
(„ASCI‟) against P&G‟s original assertion of popularity, terming it as misleading and untrue,
as the conclusions were based on an old study conducted in Thailand, rather than indicating
recent trends in the Indian market. ASCI upheld the complaint and recommended that P&G
desist from engaging in any advertising campaign of such nature. Unilever has subsequently
approached the Delhi High Court to seek an authoritative determination of the issue. Hence,
the right that had been conferred on advertisers to make untrue statements regarding the
utility of the product was extinguished.
CONCLUSION: Advertising plays an important role by creating primary demand for the
product or service and its usage rate to increase the product‟s customer base. Advertising
Ethics means “good conduct” or “conduct which is right in view of the society and the time
period”. And this advertising ethics becomes more important in case of India – a young
democratic nation in comparison to a fully developed nation like USA or UK because the
illiteracy rate is much higher than the literacy rate to understand the real motive of that
particular product . Democracy is the term used for justice, freedom and equality one must
not forget this and try to make fool and profit out of someone who is still competing with
himself.
This is the reason why regulation is important and thus the three major participants in theadvertising procedure - advertisers, agencies and the media should work individually and
collectively to encourage truthful, ethical, and responsible advertising ensuring that the rights
of both the competitor and consumer are safeguarded.