advances and prospects in forage systems biology and molecular...
TRANSCRIPT
Advances and Prospects in Forage
Systems Biology and Molecular Breeding
German Spangenberg
2
Systems Biology: from Genome to Phenome
3
Systems Biology for Transformational
Through-Value Chain Impact
Forage yield
Forage quality
Forage persistence
Biotic stress tolerance
Abiotic stress tolerance
Feed efficiency
Milk composition
Methane
Core genetic traits
Milk composition Products
Health
Nutrition
Plant
symbiome Rumen
microbiome Animal
symbiome Milk
biome
Systems Biology of Forage Grass
Symbiomes and Microbiomes
N H
O
O
H O O O
O
H O
H
C h e m i c a l F o r m u l a : C 3 9 H 5 1 N O 7 E x a c t M a s s : 6 4 5 . 3 6 6 5 5
N H
N H
H N
O
N O
N H O H
O
O C h e m i c a l F o r m u l a : C 2 9 H 3 5 N 5 O 5
E x a c t M a s s : 5 3 3 . 2 6 3 8 2
N N
O
N
N H 2
H 2 N
C h e m i c a l F o r m u l a : C 1 2 H 1 7 N 5 O E x a c t M a s s : 2 4 7 . 1 4 3 3 1 Janthitrem I
ergovaline
peramine
[M+H] + 248.15022
[M+H] + 646.37238
[M+H] + 534.27002 N H
O
H O
O
O
H
O
H O
O H
H
C h e m i c a l F o r m u l a : C 4 2 H 5 5 N O 7 E x a c t M a s s : 6 8 5 . 3 9 7 8 5
[M+H] + 686.40369
Lolitrem B
N H
O
O
H O O O
O
H O
H
C h e m i c a l F o r m u l a : C 3 9 H 5 1 N O 7 E x a c t M a s s : 6 4 5 . 3 6 6 5 5
N H
N H
H N
O
N O
N H O H
O
O C h e m i c a l F o r m u l a : C 2 9 H 3 5 N 5 O 5
E x a c t M a s s : 5 3 3 . 2 6 3 8 2
N N
O
N
N H 2
H 2 N
C h e m i c a l F o r m u l a : C 1 2 H 1 7 N 5 O E x a c t M a s s : 2 4 7 . 1 4 3 3 1 Janthitrem I
ergovaline
peramine
[M+H] + 248.15022
[M+H] + 646.37238
[M+H] + 534.27002 N H
O
H O
O
O
H
O
H O
O H
H
C h e m i c a l F o r m u l a : C 4 2 H 5 5 N O 7 E x a c t M a s s : 6 8 5 . 3 9 7 8 5
[M+H] + 686.40369
Lolitrem B
5
• Asexual filamentous fungi (phylum Ascomycota, family Clavicipitaceae) that form mutualistic symbioses with temperate grasses (subfamily Pooideae)
• Seed transmissible
• Protect host grasses from biotic (e.g. insects and vertebrate herbivores) and abiotic (e.g. drought) stresses
• Produce several bioactive secondary metabolites in planta
• Evolved from sexual grass choke Epichloë pathogens
Neotyphodium spp. Endophytes
E. festucae
Loss of
sexual state
N. lolii
(c. 29 + 4 Mb)
N. lolii x E. typhina
Interspecific
hybridisation
N. sp. LpTG-2
(c. 55 + 6 Mb)
6
From Endophyte Discovery to Pangenome
Analysis Exploiting Global Genetic Diversity – Endophytes
from Perennial Ryegrass
Genetically similar endophytes have a similar toxin profile and origin
Endophytes with reduced toxicity effects are genetically divergent
from the main group
Selection of novel candidate endophytes based on:
DNA profiles
Geographic origin
Toxin profiles
Endophytes cluster into groups based
on geographical origin and toxin
production
Ability to predict likely toxin production
based on genotypic profile Genetic similarity
0.12 0.34 0.56 0.78 1.00
Genetic similarity
0.12 0.34 0.56 0.78 1.00
Middle East
Eastern Europe
Northern Europe
Lolitrem B
Peramine
Middle East
Mediterranean
Western Europe
New World
Lolitrem B
Ergovaline
Peramine
Mediterranean
Western Europe
Eastern Europe
Ergovaline
Peramine
Peramine
LpTG-2
N. lolii
LpTG-3
A broadly-applicable approach for discovery of novel endophytes
Janthitrem
7
In vitro cultures of candidate endophytes
Endophyte genotypes confirmation
Long-term cryopreservation of endophyte cultures
Species No. Isolates Examples
N. lolii 70 ST, NEA2, NEA3, NEA5, NEA6, NEA10, 42 novel endophytes
N. coenophialum 43 E34, E6, 22 novel endophytes
LpTG-2 7 NEA4, NEA11, 3 novel endophytes
LpTG-3 5 NEA12, E1
FaTG-2 4 8907 and 3 novel endophytes
FaTG-3 6 NEA21, NEA23
N. uncinatum 1 E81
Total 136
Discovering Genetically Novel Endophytes
A broad-based, germplasm collection of novel, genetically diverse endophytes 7
8
E9
G4
ST
C9
NA6
Lp19
AR1
NEA3
Genetic similarity
0.12 0.34 0.56 0.78 1.00
Genetic similarity
0.12 0.34 0.56 0.78 1.00
Middle East
Eastern Europe
Northern Europe
Lolitrem
Peramine
Middle East
Mediterranean
Western Europe
New World
Lolitrem
Ergovaline
Peramine
Mediterranean
Western Europe
Eastern Europe
Ergovaline
Peramine
Peramine
NEA12, 15310,15311
E1
Ef E2368
N. lolii
LpTG-3
NEA10
15335
15441
NEA2
15714
NEA6
15931 F2
A1
NEA11
NEA4
LpTG-2
Over 80 ryegrass endophyte strains sequenced
16 N. lolii 3 LpTG-2 4 LpTG-3
Reference genome construction - ST
Representatives of global diversity of perennial ryegrass endophytes
Current commercial endophytes [e.g. AR1, NEA2, NEA3 and NEA4]
New endophytes in pre-commercial development [e.g. NEA10, NEA11, NEA12]
Within cluster analysis of genetic diversity - Endophytes from distinct geographical origins [e.g. ST (Grasslands Samson) – NA6 (Morocco) and C9 (Spain)]
- Endophytes from the same geographical origin [e.g. NEA12 (France) – 15310 and 15311]
Pangenome Analysis of Endophytes
Pangenome analysis across spectrum of genetic, geographic
and taxonomic diversity of endophytes from perennial ryegrass 8
9 Gene present Gene absent Gene partially present
Pangenome Analysis of Endophytes Sequence Diversity in Alkaloid Production Genes
Identification of core and flexible genomes in Neotyphodium endophytes 9
10
Establishing Symbiota in Isogenic Hosts
Developing Diverse Perennial Ryegrass Isogenic Host Panel
Host cultivar Characteristics Number of
TCR genotypesa
TCR genotype used for
inoculation
Tolosa Distinct forage type 1 Tol 03
Bronsyn Standard forage type with robust
endophyte performance 3 Bro 08
Impact Late flowering, dense tillering forage type 3 Imp 04
Meridian Early flowering forage type 1 Mer 05
Barsandra Turf type 1 San 02
Bealey Tetraploid forage type 2 Bea 02
Barsintra Tetraploid forage type 4 Sin 04
Barfest Intergeneric hybrid between Lolium
species parents 3 Fest 02
Materials for symbiome analysis to dissect
endophyte and grass host effects 10
11
Establishing Symbiota in Isogenic Hosts Inoculating Novel Endophytes into Perennial Ryegrass Isogenic Host Panel
Establishing defined symbiota to study Gp x Ge effects 11
12
Endophyte Transcriptome in Symbiota
Perennial ryegrass symbiota; isogenic background; with/without ST endophyte
6 growth conditions: complete media; Low NO3, Low NH4, Low K, Low PO4 and Low Ca
RNAseq libraries; shoots and roots; sequence reads mapped using BLASTn; plant and endophyte transcripts
Endophyte genic sequence reads only observed in tillers of symbiota
Endophyte transcriptome only in symbiotum shoots
genes
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
Full Ca K NH 4
NO 3
PO 4
Full Ca K NH 4
NO 3
PO 4
Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST
Leaves Roots
Reads mapped to endophyte genes with an overlap >40 bp and a percent identity of greater >98 genes
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
Full Ca K NH 4
NO 3
PO 4
Full Ca K NH 4
NO 3
PO 4
Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST Free ST
Shoots Roots
Reads mapped to endophyte genes with an overlap >40 bp and a percent identity of greater >98
13
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
LpL_FRFULL1_80_40
LpL_FRCa1_80_40
LpL_FRK1_80_40
LpL_FRNH1_80_40
LpL_FRNO1_80_40
LpL_FRPO1_80_40
LpL_STFULL1_80_40
LpL_STCa1_80_40
LpL_STK1_80_40
LpL_STNH1_80_40
LpL_STNO1_80_40
LpL_STPO1_80_40
mito
cp
rRNA
gene_sum
Number of reads mapping to plant genes from leaf libraries
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
LpL_FRFULL1_80_40
LpL_FRCa1_80_40
LpL_FRK1_80_40
LpL_FRNH1_80_40
LpL_FRNO1_80_40
LpL_FRPO1_80_40
LpL_STFULL1_80_40
LpL_STCa1_80_40
LpL_STK1_80_40
LpL_STNH1_80_40
LpL_STNO1_80_40
LpL_STPO1_80_40
mito
cp
rRNA
gene_sum
Number of reads mapping to plant genes from leaf libraries
Plant Transcriptome in Symbiota
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
LpL_FRFULL1_80_40
LpL_FRCa1_80_40
LpL_FRK1_80_40
LpL_FRNH1_80_40
LpL_FRNO1_80_40
LpL_FRPO1_80_40
LpL_STFULL1_80_40
LpL_STCa1_80_40
LpL_STK1_80_40
LpL_STNH1_80_40
LpL_STNO1_80_40
LpL_STPO1_80_40
mito
cp
rRNA
gene_sum
Number of reads mapping to plant genes from leaf libraries
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
LpL_FRFULL1_80_40
LpL_FRCa1_80_40
LpL_FRK1_80_40
LpL_FRNH1_80_40
LpL_FRNO1_80_40
LpL_FRPO1_80_40
LpL_STFULL1_80_40
LpL_STCa1_80_40
LpL_STK1_80_40
LpL_STNH1_80_40
LpL_STNO1_80_40
LpL_STPO1_80_40
mito
cp
rRNA
gene_sum
Number of reads mapping to plant genes from leaf libraries
Number of sequence reads mapped to plant sequences in shoot libraries (2.4 to 20.8 million reads per library)
Counts mapping to genes used to identify endophyte-induced or repressed plant genes in symbiota shoots
Of 918 endophyte-regulated plant genes 68 are differentially regulated in shoots
(51 induced and 15 repressed)
Shoot Transcriptome: Endophyte-Regulated Plant Genes
13
14
Plant Transcriptome in Symbiota Root Transcriptome: Endophyte-Regulated Plant Genes
Number of sequence reads mapped to plant sequences in root libraries (2.4 to 20.8 million reads per library)
Counts mapping to genes used to identify endophyte-induced or repressed plant genes in symbiota roots
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
LpR_FR
FULL1_80_40
LpR_FR
Ca1_80_40
LpR_FR
K1_80_40
LpR_FR
NH
1_80_40
LpR_FR
NO
1_80_40
LpR_FR
PO1_80_40
LpR_S
TFULL1_80_40
LpR_S
TCa1_80_40
LpR_S
TK1_80_40
LpR_S
TNH
1_80_40
LpR_S
TNO
1_t80_40
LpR_S
TPO
1_80_40
mito
cp
rRNA
gene_sum
Number of reads mapping to plant genes from root libraries
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
LpR_FR
FULL1_80_40
LpR_FR
Ca1_80_40
LpR_FR
K1_80_40
LpR_FR
NH
1_80_40
LpR_FR
NO
1_80_40
LpR_FR
PO1_80_40
LpR_S
TFULL1_80_40
LpR_S
TCa1_80_40
LpR_S
TK1_80_40
LpR_S
TNH
1_80_40
LpR_S
TNO
1_t80_40
LpR_S
TPO
1_80_40
mito
cp
rRNA
gene_sum
Number of reads mapping to plant genes from root libraries
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
LpL_FRFULL1_80_40
LpL_FRCa1_80_40
LpL_FRK1_80_40
LpL_FRNH1_80_40
LpL_FRNO1_80_40
LpL_FRPO1_80_40
LpL_STFULL1_80_40
LpL_STCa1_80_40
LpL_STK1_80_40
LpL_STNH1_80_40
LpL_STNO1_80_40
LpL_STPO1_80_40
mito
cp
rRNA
gene_sum
Number of reads mapping to plant genes from leaf libraries
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
LpL_FRFULL1_80_40
LpL_FRCa1_80_40
LpL_FRK1_80_40
LpL_FRNH1_80_40
LpL_FRNO1_80_40
LpL_FRPO1_80_40
LpL_STFULL1_80_40
LpL_STCa1_80_40
LpL_STK1_80_40
LpL_STNH1_80_40
LpL_STNO1_80_40
LpL_STPO1_80_40
mito
cp
rRNA
gene_sum
Number of reads mapping to plant genes from leaf libraries
Of 918 endophyte-regulated plant genes 728 are differentially regulated in roots
(529 induced and 167 repressed) 14
Plant Transcriptome in Symbiota
Cluster 3: root-expressed genes induced
by endophytes, but expressed at lower level
in endophyte-free plants
Largest cluster of endophyte-regulated
plant genes
Annotation of endophyte-regulated plant
genes
Defence response genes
Chitin responsive genes
Innate immunity genes
Patterns of Expression in Endophyte-Regulated Plant Genes
Part of cluster 3 hierachical clusterPart of cluster 3 hierachical cluster
Symbiotum transcriptional
response to endophyte
presence is up-regulation of
defence-related genes in roots 15
Plant Transcriptome in Symbiota
Hierarchical clustering of C1Hierarchical clustering of C1
Cluster 1: root-expressed genes repressed by
endophytes
Annotation of endophyte-regulated plant genes
Transcription regulators
Max2 F-box LRR gene in
signalling of strigolactones
Patterns of Expression in Endophyte-Regulated Plant Genes
Clusters 10 and 11: shoot-expressed genes
repressed by endophyte
Annotation of 15 endophyte-regulated plant genes
3 MADS-box genes
2 blue light photoreceptors
1 cytokinin oxidase
Carbohydrate metabolism and transporters
16
17
Peramine
N-formylloline
Lolitrem B
Metabolome Analysis of Symbiota
Ergovaline
Metabolic Profiling of Natural Symbiota
Metabolic profiling across spectrum of genetic, geographic
and taxonomic diversity of endophytes from perennial ryegrass 17
18
Barsandra Tolosa Impact
Lolitrem B
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 E1 STx x x
b
a
Ergovaline
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 E1 STx x x
*
Janthitrem
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 E1 STx
a
ab
b
x x
Peramine
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 E1 ST
b a
a
*
* b
a
x x x
NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 E1 ST
Lo
litr
em
B
Erg
ova
lin
e
Ja
nth
itre
m
Pe
ram
ine
Metabolome Analysis of Symbiota Metabolic Profiling of Novel Symbiota
in Isogenic Hosts
Strong Gp x Ge effects on alkaloid toxin profiles
in defined symbiota with novel endophytes 18
Endophyte
strain
Putative
toxin profile
Endogenous
toxin profile
Isogenic
(confirmed)
toxin profile
Taxon
NEA10 Unknown -/E/n.d a -/E/P/- (Y) N. lolii
NEA11 E+P -/E/n.d a -/E/P/- (Y) Lp TG-2
NEA12 Unknown -/-/- -/-/-/J (Y) Lp TG-3
E1 Unknown n.d -/-/-/-
ST L/E/P L/E/P/- (Y) N. lolii
a Peramine not measured
Lp TG-3
19
Metabolome Analysis of Symbiota
X X X X
Adapted from Young et al, 2009
10 lolitrem biosynthetic genes
3 gene clusters
2 deletions (LtmE, LtmJ)
Pathway Analysis – Lolitrem Biosynthesis
19
20
Compound Bea02 Bro08 Imp04 San02 Tol03 Imp04 Bea02 Bro08 Imp04 San02 Tol03 Imp04 San02 Tol03 Bro08 Imp04 Bea02 Bro08 San02 Tol03
E- E- E- E- E- NEA10 NEA11 NEA11 NEA11 NEA11 NEA11 NEA12 NEA12 NEA12 E1 E1 ST ST ST ST
paspaline - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
13-desoxy paxilline - - - - - + + + + + + + + + - - + + + +
paxilline - - - - - + + + + + + + +(Trace) +(Trace) - - + + + +
terpendole I - - - - - + + + + + + + - + - - + + + +
prenylate terpendole I - - - - - + + + + + + + - + - - + + + +
terpendole C - - - - - + + + + + + + - + - - + + + +
lolitriol - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + + +
lolitrem E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + + +
lolitrem B - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + + +
lolitrem J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
lolitrem K - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + + +
paspalicine - - - - - + + + + + + + - + - - + + + +
paspalicinol - - - - - + + + + + + + + + - - + + + +
paspalininol - - - - - + + + + + + + - + - - + + + +
paspalinine - - - - - + + + + + + + - + - - + + + +
aflatrem - - - - - + + + + - + + - + - - + + - +
tryptophan + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
chanoclavine - - - - - + + + + + + - - - - - + + + +
secolysergine - - - - - - - - + + - - - - - - + + + +
agroclavine - - + + + + + + + + + + - - - + + + + +
setoclavine - - - + + + + + + + + - + + - + + + + +
elymoclavine - - - - - + + + + + + - - - - - + + + +
lysergic acid + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
lysergyl peptide lactam - - - - - + + - + - + - - - - - + + + +
lysergyl alanine - - - - - + + + + + + - - - - - + + + +
lysergamide - - - - - + + + + + + - - - - - + + + +
ergovaline - - - - - + +(Trace) + + +(Trace) + - - - - - +(Trace) + + +
lysergol - - - - - + + + + + + - - - - - + + + +
Peramine +(Trace) +(Trace) +(Trace) +(Trace) +(Trace) + + + + + + +(Trace) +(Trace) +(Trace) +(Trace) +(Trace) + + + +
Imidacloprid - - - - + - - - - + + - + + - - - - + -
4-Hydroxy-imidacloprid + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Janthitrem I - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + +(Trace) - - - -
Janthitrem A - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + - + + + +
Janthitrem B - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + - - - -
Janthitrem C + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Peramine
Janthitrem
Host-EndophyteSymbiota
Lolitrems
Aflatrem
Ergot
Alkaloids
Metabolome Analysis of Symbiota Pathway Analyses – Lolitrems, Aflatrem, Ergot Alkaloids, Peramine and Janthitrems
20
21
Assessing Endophyte Stability and Symbiota Performance
Barsandra E- ST NEA11 NEA12
Bronsyn
A. Number of inoculations performed
ST NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 Total
Bea02 40 30 70
Bro08 80 75 155
Imp04 90 50 140
San02 80 50 130
Tol03 80 40 120
Total 0 370 0 245 615
B. Number of inoculations tested
ST NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 Total
Bea02 31 21 52
Bro08 59 50 109
Imp04 60 21 81
San02 64 31 95
Tol03 32 27 59
Total 246 150 396
C. Number of successful inoculations
ST NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 Total
Bea02 0 1 1
Bro08 1 0 1
Imp04 1 2 3
San02 0 1 1
Tol03 0 2 2
Total 2 6 8
D. Percent of successful inoculations
ST NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 Total
Bea02 0 1 1.0
Bro08 1.7 0 1.7
Imp04 1.7 9.5 11.2
San02 0 3.2 3.2
Tol03 0 7.4 7.4
Total 3.4 21.2 24.5
Stable association
Unstable association
Stable association
Unstable association
E- ST NEA11 NEA12
Phenome Analysis of Symbiota
21
22
Assessing Endophyte Effect on Symbiota Performance Shoot Fresh Weight in Response to Nitrate
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
E- NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 ST
Host-Endophyte Association
Fres
h W
eigh
t (g)
0.5 mM NO3-
2.5 mM NO3-
10.0 mM NO3-
Shoot fresh weightTiller Number in Response to Nitrate
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
E- NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 ST
Host-Endophyte Association
Tille
r N
umbe
r
0.5 mM NO3-
2.5 mM NO3-
10.0 mM NO3-
Tiller number
Root fresh weightRoot Fresh Weight in Response to Nitrate
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
E- NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 ST
Host-Endophyte Association
Roo
t Fre
sh W
eigh
t (g)
0.5 mM NO3-
2.5 mM NO3-
10.0 mM NO3-
Root Dry Weight in Response to Nitrate
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
E- NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 ST
Host-Endophyte Association
Roo
t Dry
Wei
ght (
g)
0.5 mM NO3-
2.5 mM NO3-
10.0 mM NO3-
Root dry weight
Shoot Fresh Weight in Response to Nitrate
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
E- NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 ST
Host-Endophyte Association
Fres
h W
eigh
t (g)
0.5 mM NO3-
2.5 mM NO3-
10.0 mM NO3-
Shoot fresh weightTiller Number in Response to Nitrate
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
E- NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 ST
Host-Endophyte Association
Tille
r N
umbe
r
0.5 mM NO3-
2.5 mM NO3-
10.0 mM NO3-
Tiller number
Root fresh weightRoot Fresh Weight in Response to Nitrate
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
E- NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 ST
Host-Endophyte Association
Roo
t Fre
sh W
eigh
t (g)
0.5 mM NO3-
2.5 mM NO3-
10.0 mM NO3-
Root Dry Weight in Response to Nitrate
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
E- NEA10 NEA11 NEA12 ST
Host-Endophyte Association
Roo
t Dry
Wei
ght (
g)
0.5 mM NO3-
2.5 mM NO3-
10.0 mM NO3-
Root dry weight
0.5 mM NO3-
2.5 mM NO3-
10.0 mM NO3-
Phenome Analysis of Symbiota
22
23
23 N-formylloline
Peramine
• Perennial ryegrass and • Tall fescue
Establish symbiota
with both:
NEA21 Morocco
NEA23 Tunisia
Novel endophytes for broad deployment discovered and characterised 23
Novel Fungal Endophytes for Forage Grasses Discovering Endophytes with Novel Bioactivity
and Broad Host Specificity
24
Forage Grass Microbiomes Meta-Transcriptomics of Ryegrass Microbiomes
Alphaproteobacteria, 654
Gammaproteobacteria,
493
Betaproteobacteria, 421
Actinobacteria, 341
Bacteroidetes, 294
Cyanobacteria/Chloroplast
, 235
Firmicutes, 136
Chlamydiae, 6
Spirochaetes, 12Chloroflexi, 15
Planctomycetes, 31
Deltaproteobacteria, 59
Deinococcus-Thermus, 23
Nitrospira, 4Tenericutes, 10
Epsilonproteobacteria, 7
Acidobacteria, 3
Fusobacteria, 2
Chrysiogenetes, 2
Deferribacteres, 2
Verrucomicrobia, 17
Diverse bacterial microbiomes revealed in forage grasses
Rapid and cost
effective RNA
profiling of
plant microbiomes
• Shoot and root microbiomes
• Meta-transcriptomics (16S rRNA)
• Over 2700 bacterial phyla in
perennial ryegrass microbiome
24
25
Forage Grass Microbiomes Shoot and Root Microbiomes in Perennial Ryegrass
Hierarchical clustering of bacterial counts classifies root treatments but not shoot treatments.
Meta-transcriptomics reveals differences in bacterial species
predominance in shoot and root microbiomes
Root microbiome profiles ‘descriptive’ of treatment (e.g. nutritional status) 25
26
Forage Grass Microbiomes Shoot and Root Microbiomes in Perennial Ryegrass
L_F
_FU
LL1
L_F
_FU
LL3
L_F
_FU
LL5
L_F
_Ca2
L_F
_Ca4
L_F
_K1
L_F
_K3
L_F
_K5
L_F
_NH
2L_
F_N
H4
L_F
_NO
1L_
F_N
O3
L_F
_NO
5L_
F_P
02*
L_F
_P04
*L_
S_F
ULL
1L_
S_F
ULL
3L_
S_F
ULL
5L_
S_C
a2L_
S_C
a4L_
S_K
1L_
S_K
3L_
S_K
5L_
S_N
H2
L_S
_NH
4L_
S_N
O1
L_S
_NO
3L_
S_N
O5
L_S
_P02
*L_
S_P
04*
R_F
_FU
LL1
R_F
_FU
LL3
R_F
_FU
LL5
R_F
_Ca2
R_F
_Ca4
R_F
_K1
R_F
_K3
R_F
_K5
R_F
_NH
2R
_F_N
H4
R_F
_NO
1R
_F_N
OL3
R_F
_NO
5R
_F_P
O2
R_F
_PO
4R
_S_F
ULL
1R
_S_F
ULL
3R
_S_F
ULL
5R
_S_C
a2R
_S_C
a4R
_S_K
1R
_S_K
3R
_S_K
5R
_S_N
H2
R_S
_NH
4R
_S_N
O1
R_S
_NO
3R
_S_N
O5
R_S
_PO
2R
_S_P
O4
Azospirillum sp
0
50
100
150
200
250
Azospirillum sp
Azospirillum sp
Azospirillum amazonense
Azospirillum sp
Azospirillum sp
Azospirillum amazonense
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum lipoferum
Azospirillum sp
Azospirillum sp
Azospirillum brasilense
Analysis of bacterial microbiome in symbiota reveals range of bacterial
species known to be N fixers and phytostimulators of grasses
Azospirillum species induced in number (under low N)
Associative nitrogen fixation
Synthesis of phytohormones
26
Integrative, Genomics-Assisted
F1 Hybrid Breeding of
Forage Grass Symbiota
Lessons and Prospects?
1. Breeding and Selection of Host Grass Only
Current Paradigm
2. Few Selective Recombinations in Long Breeding Cycle
4. Evaluation of Symbiota (i.e. Grass-Endophyte Associations)
3. Inoculation of Single Unselected Endophytes
5. Seed Generational Advance Limiting Heterosis
6. No Hybrid Varieties Limiting Value Capture
28
Lessons and Prospects?
1. Ab Initio Breeding and Selection of Symbiota
New Paradigm?
2. More Selective Recombinations in Shorter Breeding Cycle
4. More Accurate Evaluation of Symbiota
3. Exploit Broader Endophyte Diversity and Endophyte Effects
5. Exploit Heterosis and High-Impact Traits
6. Hybrid Varieties Enhancing Value Capture
29
Capture Ab Initio Plant Genotype X Endophyte Genotype Effects
Capture and Exploit Broader Endophyte Genotype Effects
on Symbiota Performance
Extend Concept of Synthetic Varieties to Both Partners of
the Symbiotum i.e. Grass Host and Endophyte
→ Deploy multiple endophyte and grass genotypes in populations
selected for optimal symbiota compatibility and performance
→ Breed and select ab initio symbiota for optimal symbiota compatibility
and performance rather than breed and select grass host only followed
by endophyte inoculation and symbiota evaluation
→ Exploit significant endophyte genotype effects on symbiota performance
well beyond pest resistance (and reduced animal toxicosis)
What Does This Mean?
30
Maximise Heterosis in Farmers’ Seed
Deliver F1 Hybrid Symbiota Varieties for Maximal On-Farm Impact
Reduce Generation Interval and Increase Selection Intensity
of Symbiota
→ Tailor genomic selection interventions in breeding cycle building on
simulated breeding schemes and sward-relevant phenotypes
→ Implement integrative, F1 hybrid symbiota breeding schemes building on
self-incompatibility allele typing
→ Produce F1 hybrid seed of symbiota deploying multiple endophytes and
high-impact traits
What Does This Mean?
31
Overcoming Bottle-Necks
• New tools for efficient, robust, low-cost, large-scale
generation of grass-endophyte symbiota
Method applicable to inoculation of 10s of endophytes in
100s of grass genotypes
Method applicable to inoculation of novel and designer
endophytes with de novo generated genetic variation
[i.e. induced mutagenesis (ionizing radiation, colchicine), genome editing, transgenesis]
Enabling tool for next-generation ab initio molecular breeding, selection
and evaluation of grass-endophyte symbiota [rather than breeding and selection of
grass host followed by endophyte inoculation and symbiota evaluation only]
High-Throughput, Large-Scale Endophyte Inoculation
32
Day 1 Day 3 Days 4-5 Days 6-7 Days 8-10 Day 1 Day 3 Days 4-5 Days 6-7 Days 8-10
Production of Artificial Seeds
Large-Scale Generation of Symbiota
Coating with single or multiple Ca-alginate matrix layers of ryegrass mature seed-derived embryos
Assessing germination frequency of artificial seeds
33
Inoculation of isolated
seed-derived embryos with endophyte mycelia followed by Ca-alginate coating into artificial seeds or double-coating of isolated seed-derived embryos with endophyte- containing inner Ca- alginate matrix
Coating seed-derived embryos with multiple endophytes into viable symbiota artificial seeds
a b c
First coating Second coating Endophyte outgrowth Germinating symbiota
Large-Scale Inoculation of Endophytes into Artificial Seeds Large-Scale Generation of Symbiota
Generating > 1,000 viable symbiota artificial seeds per FTE and day
Established symbiota plants with live endophytes in <50% artificial seeds. 34
Predicting Endophyte Stability in Stored Seed and Selecting
Stable Associations Using Accelerated Ageing
A method for Accelerated Ageing [i.e. 80% -100% RH for 4-7 days]
of seed (natural and artificial) with resident endophytes developed
The method allows to predict endophyte stability in stored
seed [range of endophytes assessed in single and different host genetic backgrounds]
The method allows to rank novel endophytes according to predicted
stability/viability in stored seed
[range of endophytes assessed in single host genetic background]
The method allows to select and rank symbiota according to their
stability
Overcoming Bottle-Necks
35
36
NEA12
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Alto Bealey Bronsyn Trojan
Control
80% 4d
80% 7d
100% 4d
100% 7d
NEA10
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Alto Bealey Bronsyn Trojan
Control
80% 4d
80% 7d
100% 4d
100% 7d
NEA11
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Alto Bealey Bronsyn Trojan
Control
80% 4d
80% 7d
100% 4d
100% 7d
E1
E1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
A l to Beal ey Br onsyn T r oj an Endo
Cont r ol
80% 4d
80% 7d
100% 4d
100% 7d
E1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
A l to Beal ey Br onsyn T r oj an Endo
Cont r ol
80% 4d
80% 7d
100% 4d
100% 7d
Accelerated ageing [i.e. 100%RH for 4d or 7d] allows ranking endophytes for
compatibility and selecting for endophyte genotype-host genotype stability
Using Accelerated Ageing to Select for Symbiota Viability and Stability Assessed endophyte viability and stability of symbiota after accelerated ageing treatment of seed
Selection for Symbiota Stability
36
37
Rapid Early Assay of Endophyte Viability in Symbiota
37
Overcoming Bottle-Necks
A fast, reliable and low-cost method for determining endophyte
viability in perennial ryegrass seeds, seedlings and established
symbiota
Assay Requirements:
1. Rapid determination: 3-5 day old epicotyls
2. Robust and reliable
3. Sensitive for use in single seed to seed batches
4. Specific to Neotyphodium endophytes
(i.e. does not detect other fungi)
5. Detects live endophyte only
Seed with endophyte
38 38
Assaying Endophyte Viability Metabolomics-Based Assay
Assays developed based on:
• Genotyping
• Early gene expression
• Production of indicator metabolites
Seed
germination
Harvest
epicotyls
Dark
Light
Day 1 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6
Metabolite
extraction
Direct
Injection MS
Set-up
Data
analysis
With Endophyte
Without Endophyte
Detection of E- seed
Rapid (≤6 days), low cost (<$1/sample) assay – 5X cheaper and 5X faster
39 39
Increasing Accuracy and Reducing Cost of Phenotyping
Low-cost, high-throughput, accurate methods for large-scale
phenotyping of individual plants for herbage quality traits
Robust, reliable methods enabled by automated workflows
Overcoming Bottle-Necks
Low-cost, high-throughput, accurate methods for large-scale,
multisite phenotyping of key traits at sward level
Field-based phenomics (from individual plant to farmer’s paddock)
Laboratory-based molecular phenomics
Generating low-cost, high-throughput, accurate, relevant
phenotypes for genomics-assisted molecular breeding
40
Rainout Shelters Precise water-stress treatments
Automated Assessments Vegetative biomass Quality traits – CP/WSC/ME/Minerals Persistence traits – Biomass
over time Stress related traits
Active Optical Sensors Canopy greenness &
photosynthetic capacity Normalised difference
vegetative index output Forage quality
Field-Based Phenomics
40
41
Non-Destructive Forage Yield Estimation Using Normalized
Difference Vegetation Index
Field-Based Phenomics
GreenSeeker Aphex hexacopter
41
42
peramine
0
10000000
20000000
30000000
40000000
50000000
60000000
70000000
80000000
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93 97 101105109113117121125129133137141145149153157161165169173177
Sample ID
Am
ount
of
Per
amin
e
lolitrem B
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
3500000
4000000
1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106 113 120 127 134 141 148 155 162 169 176
Sample ID
amou
nt o
f lo
litre
m B
ergovaline
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
7000000
8000000
9000000
1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106 113 120 127 134 141 148 155 162 169 176
Sample ID
amo
un
t of e
rgo
valin
e
peramine
ergovaline
lolitrem B
Exploiting genotype x genotype
interactions
Overcoming limitations of current
paradigm: breeding hosts and
evaluating symbiota
Setting the basis for molecular
breeding of symbiota
Proof of concept in semi-
quantitative toxin profiling of
symbiota breeding population
(i.e. 80 Bealey NEA2/NEA6)
Significant variation in alkaloid
profile and content
Molecular Phenomics of Symbiota Molecular Phenotyping to
Enable Symbiota Selection
42
43
Molecular Phenomics of Symbiota
0
10000000
20000000
30000000
40000000
50000000
60000000
70000000
80000000
1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103 109 115 121 127 133 139 145 151 157 163 169 175
lolitrem B
ergovaline
peramine
0
10000000
20000000
30000000
40000000
50000000
60000000
70000000
80000000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
lolitrem B
ergovaline
peramine
Top 20 peramine producing symbiota
Molecular Phenotyping to Enable Symbiota Selection
Selection of symbiota within breeding population with favourable toxin profiles
• high peramine, low ergovaline, no lolitrem B
Molecular breeding of symbiota capturing ab initio Gp x Ge effects 43
44 44
Refined breeding schemes
Phenotyping tools at acceptable cost
Genotyping tools at acceptable costs
Computational tools to handle data
and empowering breeders
Genomic Selection Selection candidates
Genotypes
Selected parents
Estimated
breeding values
Prediction equation
Genomic Breeding Value = w 1 x 1 +w 2 x 2 +w 3 x 3 ……..
Reference population
Genotypes
Phenotypes
Increasing Rate of Genetic Gain via Genomic Selection
Overcoming Bottle-Necks
45 45
Rates of Selective Breeding, Genetic Gain and Improvement
M1 B M2
(A) (B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
Genomic selection
Update
prediction
equation
Multi-site environment trials
F1 Production
Seed production
(F2 Production)
Selection under grazing and/or
visual assessment
Varietal construction
Seed production
Multi-environment
plot trials
1 varietal release
Base population
establishment
c. 1,000 – 10,000
Individuals
c. 100,000 Individuals
Reduction in
individuals by a
factor of 10
Selective
Recombination
Non-Selective
Recombination
Selective
Recombination
c. 1-10 Varieties
Multi-environment
plot trials
Less than 100
varietiesNon-Selective
Recombination
Less than 100 varieties
F1 Production
Seed production
(F2 Production)
Selection under grazing and/or
visual assessment
Varietal construction
Seed production
Multi-environment
plot trials
1 varietal release
Base population
establishment
c. 1,000 – 10,000
Individuals
c. 100,000 Individuals
Reduction in
individuals by a
factor of 10
Selective
Recombination
Non-Selective
Recombination
Selective
Recombination
c. 1-10 Varieties
Multi-environment
plot trials
Less than 100
varietiesNon-Selective
Recombination
Less than 100 varieties
F1 Production
Seed production
(F2 Production)
Selection under grazing and/or
visual assessment
Varietal construction
Seed production
Multi-environment
plot trials
1 varietal release
Base population
establishment
c. 1,000 – 10,000
Individuals
c. 100,000 Individuals
Reduction in
individuals by a
factor of 10
Selective
Recombination
Non-Selective
Recombination
Selective
Recombination
c. 1-10 Varieties
Multi-environment
plot trials
Less than 100
varietiesNon-Selective
Recombination
Less than 100 varieties
2 selective recombination steps
– 10 years
2 selective recombination steps – 3 years
Genomic Selection
Computational simulation of commercial ryegrass breeding program to
optimise application of genomic selection
Genomic-estimated breeding values for key traits in ryegrass breeding
46 46
Exploiting Heterosis via Novel Hybrid Breeding Scheme
Candidate genes for Self-Incompatibility loci (S and Z) discovered and
functionally characterised
An F1 hybrid breeding scheme designed and being piloted
Overcoming Bottle-Necks
Fertilisation
S1Z1
S1Z2 S2Z2 S1Z3S3Z1
S3Z3
S1S2Z1Z2
S1S2Z1Z2
S1Z1
S1Z2
S2Z1
S2Z2
PistilPollen
(haploid)(diploid)
Pistil
Anther
A method for SI allele prediction developed
47 47
Os0
4g06
4510
0 (T
C1018
21)
Os0
4g06
4520
0
Os0
4g06
4550
0
Os0
4g06
4560
0
Os0
4g06
4570
0
Os0
4g06
4590
0
Os0
4g06
4610
0
Os0
4g06
4650
0
Os0
4g06
4670
0
Os0
4g06
4680
0
Os0
4g06
4690
0
Os0
4g06
4710
0
Os0
4g06
4720
0
Os0
4g06
4730
0 (T
C1169
08)
Os0
4g06
4780
0 (T
C8905
7)
Os0
4g06
4790
0
Os0
4g06
4800
0
Os0
4g06
4820
0
Os0
4g06
4840
0
Os0
4g06
4850
0
Os0
4g06
4860
0
Os0
4g06
4870
0
Os0
4g06
4880
0
Os0
4g06
4890
0
Os0
4g06
4910
0
Os0
4g06
4920
0
Os0
4g06
4950
0
Os0
4g06
4960
0
Os0
4g06
4970
0
Os0
4g06
4990
0
Os0
4g06
5000
0 (b
cd26
6)
BAC8-E18BAC 119-E12
BAC50-H02
BAC118-B23
BAC87-P20
BAC67-H10 BAC85-A01 BAC27-A19 BAC93-M20 BAC90-J24
LpT
C101821
LpV
Q
LpO
s04g0645500
LpO
s04g0645600
LpT
C116908
LpT
C89057
LpO
s04g0648400
LpO
s04g0648500
LpO
s04g0648600
LpO
s04g0648700
LpO
s04g0648800
LpO
s04g0648900
LpO
s04g0649200
LpO
s04g0649100
Lpbcd266
BAC127-K20
BAC65-A01BAC79-L12
LpO
s06g0607900
LpD
UF
247
LpO
s03g0193400
LpO
s06g0607800
LpO
s11g0242400
LpO
s10g0419600
LpO
s06g0607900
LpO
s04g0274400
Rice chr.4
Brachypodium Bd5
Perennial ryegrass
Z locus region
Conserved genes
Specific genes
Os0
4g06
4510
0 (T
C1018
21)
Os0
4g06
4520
0
Os0
4g06
4550
0
Os0
4g06
4560
0
Os0
4g06
4570
0
Os0
4g06
4590
0
Os0
4g06
4610
0
Os0
4g06
4650
0
Os0
4g06
4670
0
Os0
4g06
4680
0
Os0
4g06
4690
0
Os0
4g06
4710
0
Os0
4g06
4720
0
Os0
4g06
4730
0 (T
C1169
08)
Os0
4g06
4780
0 (T
C8905
7)
Os0
4g06
4790
0
Os0
4g06
4800
0
Os0
4g06
4820
0
Os0
4g06
4840
0
Os0
4g06
4850
0
Os0
4g06
4860
0
Os0
4g06
4870
0
Os0
4g06
4880
0
Os0
4g06
4890
0
Os0
4g06
4910
0
Os0
4g06
4920
0
Os0
4g06
4950
0
Os0
4g06
4960
0
Os0
4g06
4970
0
Os0
4g06
4990
0
Os0
4g06
5000
0 (b
cd26
6)
BAC8-E18BAC 119-E12
BAC50-H02
BAC118-B23
BAC87-P20
BAC67-H10 BAC85-A01 BAC27-A19 BAC93-M20 BAC90-J24
LpT
C101821
LpV
Q
LpO
s04g0645500
LpO
s04g0645600
LpT
C116908
LpT
C89057
LpO
s04g0648400
LpO
s04g0648500
LpO
s04g0648600
LpO
s04g0648700
LpO
s04g0648800
LpO
s04g0648900
LpO
s04g0649200
LpO
s04g0649100
Lpbcd266
BAC127-K20
BAC65-A01BAC79-L12
LpO
s06g0607900
LpD
UF
247
LpO
s03g0193400
LpO
s06g0607800
LpO
s11g0242400
LpO
s10g0419600
LpO
s06g0607900
LpO
s04g0274400
Rice chr.4
Brachypodium Bd5
Perennial ryegrass
Z locus region
Conserved genes
Specific genes
F1 Hybrid Breeding and SI Allele Prediction
48
Advances in Forage Systems Biology
Summary
Genome, Transcriptome, Proteome, Metabolome and Phenome
Forage Symbiomes and Microbiomes – Exploiting Supplementary
Genomes
Lessons from Systems Biology of Forage Symbiomes
Integrative, Genomics-Assisted Hybrid Breeding of Symbiota
Prospects for Trebling Genetic Gain
49
Acknowledgements P. Badenhorst, N. Cogan, H. Daetwyler, S. Davidson, P. Ekanayake, S. Felitti, J. Forster, K. Fulgueras, K. Guthridge, M. Hand, B. Hayes, M. Hayden, I. Hettiarachchi, D. Isenegger, J. Kaur, G. Latipbayeva, T. Le, Z. Lin, Z. Liu, C. Ludeman, E. Ludlow, R. Mann, L. Pembleton, M. Rabinovich, M. Ramsperger, P. Rigault, S. Rochfort, T. Sawbridge, K. Shields, L. Schultz, H. Shinozuka, K. Smith, G.Tao, P. Tian, P.X. Tian, J. Tibbits, Y. Ran, E. van Zijll de Jong, J. Wang, T. Webster
C. Inch, S. van der Heijden, M. Willocks
Cluster 1 Cluster 3Cluster 2 Cluster 4
Cluster 5 Cluster 7 Cluster 8Cluster 6
Cluster 9 Cluster 10 Cluster 11 Heat map depiction of average cluster
expression.
Columns are
Cluster Number, Cluster popn., Cluster
Diversity .
Cluster 1 Cluster 3Cluster 2 Cluster 4
Cluster 5 Cluster 7 Cluster 8Cluster 6
Cluster 9 Cluster 10 Cluster 11
Cluster 1 Cluster 3Cluster 2 Cluster 4
Cluster 5 Cluster 7 Cluster 8Cluster 6
Cluster 9 Cluster 10 Cluster 11 Heat map depiction of average cluster
expression.
Columns are
Cluster Number, Cluster popn., Cluster
Diversity .
Heat map depiction of average cluster
expression.
Columns are
Cluster Number, Cluster popn., Cluster
Diversity .
Samples in order
Leaf Free Root Free Leaf ST Root ST
Replete Ca K NH4 NO3 PO4 Replete Ca K NH4 NO3 PO4 Replete Ca K NH4 NO3 PO4 Replete Ca K NH4 NO3 PO4
Plant Transcriptome in Symbiota
11 clusters generated by Self Organizing Trees Algorithm analysis of endophyte-regulated plant genes
Cluster 1: root-expressed genes repressed by endophytes
Clusters 3 and 4: root-expressed genes induced by endophytes
Patterns of Expression in Endophyte-Regulated Plant Genes
51
Plant Transcriptome in Symbiota
Cluster 2: root-expressed genes
repressed by endophytes as well as
root-expressed genes induced by
endophytes
Differential gene expression
driven by NH4 responsiveness
Patterns of Expression in Endophyte-Regulated Plant Genes
Hierarchical clustering of genes in cluster 2Hierarchical clustering of genes in cluster 2
Endophyte-regulated
plant genes differentially
regulated in roots
depending on nutritional
symbiota status
52
53
1. Alkaloid (LEPJ) profiles of symbiota
(i.e. E+) versus E- isogenic host plants
2. Alkaloid profiles of symbiota with diverse
endophyte panel in a single isogenic host
3. Alkaloid (LEPJ) profiles of symbiota with
endophytes from different taxonomic
groups across same host panel
Metabolic Profiling of Novel Symbiota in Isogenic Hosts Detailed characterisation of known
alkaloids and their precursors
Metabolome Analysis of Symbiota
Analysis of Gp x Ge effects on symbiota stability and toxin profile 53
We MUST We NEED
2X Productivity Growth 3X Genetic
Gain
55 55
Field-Based Phenomics Low-Cost, High-Throughput, Field-Based Phenotyping: Pheno-Lab
Method Consumables Assets Labour Total Cost Time/sample (min)
NIR 0 0.61 10.75 11.36 15
HPLC 7.23 7.08 0.56 14.86 40.47
Enzymatic Assay 1.37 0.27 0.67 2.31 1.17
MALDI-TOF 1.79 0.42 1.05 3.26 1.48
In-field NIR and yield 0 0.61 1.43 2.04 2
Costs ($) per sample (i.e. plant)
Accurate, low-cost, high-throughput phenotyping of forages
56
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
cont
rol 1 2 3 * 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 * 1
7 18
NEA12 colonies treated (no.)
Size
of m
ycel
ia (c
m, L
ogN
)
* **
Analysis of growth rate in culture
after 8 weeks
Initial Screen: Analysis of variance identified two
colonies significantly different to the control
NEA12v17 grows significantly faster (p<0.01**)
NEA12v4 grows significantly slower (p<0.05*)
Validation Screen: Student’s t-tests identified
two colonies significantly different to the control
NEA12v17 grows significantly faster (p<0.01**)
NEA12v15 grows significantly slower (p<0.01**)
Analysis of growth rate in culture
over 5 weeks
In Vitro Growth of NEA12 Variant Strains
Phenome Analysis of Variant Endophytes
Altered phenotypes (e.g. growth rates) observed in variant endophytes 56
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 1 2 3 4 5
Week
Gro
wth
(m
m)
NEA12
NEA12v4
NEA12v5
NEA12v6
NEA12v13
NEA12v14
NEA12v15
NEA12v17
57 Gene present Gene absent Gene partially present
Pangenome Analysis of Endophytes Sequence Diversity in Alkaloid Production Genes
Identification of core and flexible genomes in Neotyphodium endophytes 57
58
easH easA
Intergenic deletions in eas gene cluster in AR1 endophyte
AR1
(Ergo-)
ST
(Ergo+)
CONTIG_29770
lpsB easG easF easE
CONTIG_29770
Pangenome Analysis of Endophytes Sequence Diversity in Alkaloid Production Genes
Intergenic deletions and SNP causing truncated lpsA also lead to inability to produce ergovaline 58
59
Phenome Analysis of Variant Endophytes Antifungal Bioassays of NEA12 Variant Strains Drechslera brizae (11 dpi) Phoma sorghina (11 dpi)
NEA12 v14
NEA12 v13
NEA12 v6
NEA12 v5
NEA12
Rhizoctonia cerealis (9 dpi)
NEA12 v14
NEA12 v13
NEA12 v6
NEA12 v5
NEA12
NEA12 v14
NEA12 v13
NEA12 v6
NEA12 v5
NEA12
Altered phenotypes (e.g. bioactivities) observed in variant endophytes 59
F1 Hybrid Breeding Designs
Endophyte Trait Diversity
Some Key Considerations
Endophyte Deployment
Self-Incompatibility
Value Modelling and Impact Delivery
Accurate, Low-Cost Genotypes and Phenotypes
60
Selection for Symbiota Stability
61
Germination of seeds after AA
treatment and storage
Growth of germinated seedlings
in soil for eight weeks
Assessment of endophyte status by
ELISA
Accelerated ageing treatment
• Optimised conditions identified (e.g. 80% humidity, 4-7 days)
• Variation identified between endophytes and grass cultivar combinations
Predicting Endophyte Stability in Stored Seed and Selecting
Stable Associations Using Accelerated Ageing
62
Experimental Work Flow for Colchicine Mutagenesis
n nucleus
n and 2n?
Colchicine treatment
(0-0.2% w/v)
3 weeks, 22oC, 150rpm, dark
Protoplast
preparation
4 weeks, 22oC, dark
Colony
subculture
Analyse for change in nuclei
size via flow cytometry
Stained cells
Colony
regeneration
A
C D
B B A
C
D
Protoplast
preparation
(single colonies)
4 weeks, 22oC, dark
SYBR Green I
staining of nuclei
Generation of Novel N. lolii Genotypes
De Novo Generation of Variant Endophytes
62
63
Experimental Work Flow for X-Ray Mutagenesis
Detection of target gene mutants using high through-put multiplex PCR
analysis for target gene presence and absence and by genome survey
sequencing
Single colonies isolated
Mutant detection
Protoplast preparation
Potato dextrose broth for 4 - 14 days
Recovery period (10 - 14 days) Repeated radiation
Exposure to ionising radiation caesium source
(10 - 30 Gy ) - )
Recovery: 4 - 6 weeks, 22 o C, dark - o
B A B A A
- -
15 days, 22oC, dark
Generation of Novel N. lolii Genotypes
De Novo Generation of Variant Endophytes
X-ray mutagenesis for generation of variant endophytes 63
64
De Novo Generation of Variant Endophytes
Generation of Fluorescently Marked Endophytes
ST:sgfpE1:DsRed NEA12:sgfp
e
e
e
e
e
e
Reporter Endophytes to Develop Endophyte Hybridisation
Methodologies and Study Host Colonisation
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of N. lolii
and LpTG-3 endophytes with fluorescent reporter genes 64
65
De Novo Generation of Variant Endophytes
65
Proof-of-Concept for Enhancing Bio-protective Properties
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of janthitrem-producing
endophyte for perA expression and peramine production
248.15022
N H
O
O
H O O
O
O
H O
H
C h e m i c a l F o r m u l a : C 3 9 H 5 1 N O 7
E x a c t M a s s : 6 4 5 . 3 6 6 5 5
N
N
O
N
N H 2
H 2 N
C h e m i c a l F o r m u l a : C 1 2 H 1 7 N 5 O
E x a c t M a s s : 2 4 7 . 1 4 3 3 1
Janthitrem I
peramine
[M+H]
[M+H] 646.37238
pEND0025 20395 bp
25bp RB
25bp LB
attB1
attB2
SpecR/ StrepR
pBR322 origin
PVSI origin
PVSI STA region
hph
PerA gene
p gpd
P trpC
T trpC
T trpC
Peramine Biosynthesis perA Gene Expression Vector
Generation of Transgenic LpTG-3 Endophytes for Peramine Production
N. lolii ST LpTG-2 NEA11 LpTG-3 NEA12 P P J
201bp
PerA gene
414bp
Selectable marker gene
66
HTP method as NIR reference Environmental and meteorological data gathering of each trial site
Harvesting of plant material
No Sample Preparation e.g. oven drying and grinding
In-Field Biomass
In-Field Forage Quality
Forage Mobile Pheno-Lab Digital Image Library
Field-Based Phenomics
66
67
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
EB
AS
E
EB
AS
E1M
EB
AS
E1M
-Pp
eak
EB
AS
E1M
+P
pea
k
EB
AS
E+
3.0
4%
DM
Y_
Milk
EB
AS
E+
9.9
2%
DM
Y_
SR
EB
AS
E1C
EB
AS
E1S
R
Eco
no
mic
va
lue
(A
U$
pe
r h
ecta
re)
R
ela
tive
to
BA
SE
sce
na
rio
Scenario
Economic Value of Forage Traits (Elliott, relative to base scenario)
Modelling Value and Delivering Impact
67