advanced water quality analysis with gis resm 575 spring 2010 lecture 11
TRANSCRIPT
Advanced water quality analysis with GIS
RESM 575
Spring 2010
Lecture 11
2
Today
Part A Introduction to watershed analysis with GIS
Part B Advanced water quality analysis Terrain analysis
Lab 11a and 11b Basic hydro analysis tools Advanced watershed analysis with WCMS
Part A.Introduction to Watershed
Analysis with GIS
4
Overview
GIS significance Important datasets Concepts Analysis Tools
5
Why watershed analysis with GIS?
Watershed analysis is a spatial issue Used to analyze regional stressors
6
Regional stressors
1. Stream sedimentation
2. Habitat loss
3. Forest fragmentation
4. Acid mine drainage
5. Acid rain
6. Flooding
7. Invasive and non-native species
7
Watershed based frameworks
Integrative approach Legislative roots in the 1972 Clean Water Act
Goal to clean up and protect US water bodies from point and nonpoint sources
Designated uses – evaluated as part of the Clean Water Act
8
Watershed cataloging units
USGS Regions (2 digit) USGS Sub-regions (4 digit)
USGS Sub-basins (8 digit)
USGS 8-Digit sub-basins in WV
9
Watersheds for WV
NRCS 10 and 12 watersheds in WV(5th and 6th level)
n=342n=745
10
Issues
More local watersheds needed One to one relationship between land cover
runoff and receiving stream segment Track runoff from land to stream
11
Example of scale differences
DNR Stocked streams
Tier 2.5 - Reproducing trout streams
Impaired streams
Watershed boundaries
12
Solution
Delineate watershed boundaries using the topography to guide us
13
Manual method
14
Subwatersheds
15
GIS and Water Resources
GIS in watershed management:
1. Elevation surface is key
2. Delineate watersheds
3. Track flow from a point
4. Find intermittent stream paths
5. Calculate drainage areas
Geographic information systems (GIS) is a valuable tool in water resources management
16
GIS use in the hydro cycle
17
Surface hydrology
Determine where the water came from and where it is going
Describe the behavior of water as it moves over the surface of the earth
Analysis starts with the creation of a hydrologically correct surface (no sinks or peaks interrupting drainage direction)
Include the entire drainage
18
Elevation surface or grid The starting point for all hydrological modeling in GIS USGS Digital elevation model 30m or 10m elevation
cells, or 3m for WV Each cell or grid represents a value for the elevation
19
DEM sources for WV
30m (1972) found in the c:/gis-data06/grids/ directory as wv_elev Mosaic statewide
10m (1972) derived from 1:24,000 hypsography on the WVU Tech center website By 24K quad – partial state coverage
3m (2003) derived from 2003 SAMB photos on the WVU Tech Center website By 24k quad
20
21
Helpful ArcGIS commands
If you have a *.dem file
To combine dems
22
3m to 30m DEM comparison
23
National 30m seamless DEMs
24
Other hydro products to note for WV
Segment level watersheds
1:24K hydrology
25
Sinks
Depressions in the DEM where water gets trapped A sink prohibits calculating future flow direction grid
values. A sink occurs when all neighboring cells are higher
than the processing cell. Sometimes they are natural features!
26
Flow direction Created from an elevation surface Direction values are assigned Flow direction grids are used in many
hydro GIS functions
Flow direction map
32 64 128
1
248
16
27
Flow direction Created from an elevation surface Direction values are assigned Flow direction grids are used in the other flow functions
Flow direction map
32 64 128
1
248
16
28
Flow accumulation
The accumulated flow is based upon the number of cells flowing into each cell in the output grid. The current processing cell is not considered in this accumulation.
Output cells with a high flow accumulation are areas of concentrated flow and may be used to identify stream channels.
Output cells with a flow accumulation of zero are local topographic highs and may be used to identify ridges
29
30
Summary of spatial techniques and tools available within a GIS
Elevation grid
Flow direction
Fill sinks
Allows for additional landscape based analysis
Flow accumulation
Any sinks? Yes
No
Watersheds
Stream delineations
Riparian areas
Stream order
31
Delineate watersheds
Hydro toolbar in ArcGIS 9
32
Delineate watersheds interactively
Interactive delineation for a point
33
Track flow from a point
34
Track flow from a point
35
Find intermittent stream paths
Mapped streams from the 1:24,000 topomap
36
Find intermittent stream paths
Mapped streams from the 1:24,000 topomap
37
Find intermittent stream paths
Intermittent, debris slides, accumulators, path of easiest descent exist
38
39
40
Find intermittent stream paths
41
5. Calculate drainage area
Flow accumulation grid = tells us the number of cells of a certain area that flow to a point
Drainage area?
42
5. Calculate drainage area
Flow accumulation grid = tells us the number of cells of a certain area that flow to a point
43
Calculate drainage area
So, if there are 280,721 cells that flow to that location…
and each cell is 3m by 3m in size (9sq meters)
Then
The total drainage area is (280,721) * (9) = 2,526,489 sq meters
Or
2,526,489 sq meters * 0.00024718 = 624 acres
44
Summary points
Watersheds are the key unit of analysis for examining water quality issues
Scale issues require us to delineate smaller watersheds for local issues
GIS can aid in watershed management by1. Elevation grids2. Delineate watersheds3. Track flow from a point4. Find intermittent stream paths5. Calculate drainage areas
45
For basic hydrological modeling
ArcGIS9 toolbar
Lab 12 Hydrological Analysis Basics
Part B.Advanced Water Quality
Analysis with GIS
47
Overview
Terrain analysis concave/convexity, moisture index
Finding potentially affected streams Expected mean concentration modeling WCMS (Watershed Characterization and
Modeling System) ArcGIS 9 extension
48
Surface hydrology
Rainfall - runoff relationships
Runoff - above curve Losses - below curve
interception depression storage evapotranspiration infiltration
Ra
infa
ll
Time
Runoff
Ru
no
ff
Time
49
Runoff curve from gauge
Source: www.americanwhitewater.org
50
Watershed characteristics affecting runoff
Watershed configuration size shape orientation stream network
Topography Geology
soils, infiltration and erosion characteristics Surface culture
agricultural practices residential land use practices
Structures hydrologic modification
51
Watershed Characteristics Affecting Runoff Watershed shape
For a given area, watershed width affects the overland flow pattern Effects can be seen in terms of the time of concentration of flow The larger the width the longer the time of concentration
52
Possible Land-Water Transform Coefficients
Land-WaterConnection
TransformCoefficient
Water yield Runoff coefficient, C
Flood runoff SCS Curve Number, CN
Groundwater Recharge rate (mm/yr)
Water quality Expected Mean Concentration(mg/l)
Sediment yield Erosion rate (tons/ha-yr)
Water
Land
53
Moisture index
Simply a function of two factors: How much water is flowing into the area How fast the water can flow out
Ln [(catchment area + 1) / (slope + 1)]
NOTE: this is a relative moisture index, so the resulting numbers do not have units Higher more positive numbers are wetter Lower more negative numbers are drier
54
Calculating a moisture index
Compute a flow accumulation grid Compute a slope grid Input into the raster calculator:
55
56
Curvature
57
Curvature
Areas of convex profile curvature = areas of erosion
Areas of concave profile curvature = areas of deposition
Convex surface
Positive profile curvature
Slope increasing
Erosion
Concave surface
Negative profile curvature
Slope decreasing
Deposition
58
ArcMap Curvature tool
Output profile curve raster dataset.
This is the curvature of the surface in the direction of slope.
This is the curvature of the surface perpendicular to the slope direction.
59
Curvature result
convex
concave
60
Identifying potentially affected streams Overland flow non point source pollution is the number one water
quality problem in WV (2006 303d List WVDEP) Almost 20% of the streams in WV are impaired and not meeting
designated uses Sources include mine drainage, leaking or overflowing sewage
systems, illegal homeowner discharges, runoff from agriculture and urban areas
61
Identifying potentially affected streams Source of potential pollution can be mapped
as points (discharge seeps), lines (mining headwalls), or polygons (nonpoint source pollution)
The source is used as the weight grid in the flow accumulation function
A network streamgrid shows the stream and the location where the potential pollution would enter the stream
62
What we are trying to show – which streams and where in the streams runoff enters
63
Water quality estimation
Mass balance approach
AB
C
D
E
E = fn (A, B, C, D, E)
Or
E/flow = A/flow + B/flow + C/flow + D/flow
64
Expected mean concentration modeling
• EMC input is a land cover grid
• Aggregated classes and coefficients from literature (see refs at end)
Total Nitrogen Total Phosphorous Total Suspended Solids
Urban 1.89 0.009 166
Open/Brush 2.19 0.13 70
Agriculture 3.41 0.24 201
Woodland 0.79 0.006 39
Barren 3.90 0.10 2200
Wetland 0.79 0.006 39
NOTE: per acre loadings are aggregated to 30m pixels for mg/L concentrations
65
EMC Export CoefficientsEMC Export Coefficients
• year to year changes in precipitation
• soil type
• slope and slope morphology (convex, concave)
• geology
• cropping practices
• timing of fertilizer application relative to precipitation events
• density of impervious surface
Factors likely to vary across watersheds:
66
EMC modeling approach
• Nutrient export coefficients are multiplied by the amount (area) of a given land cover type
• Incorporates the location of the cover class in the downstream routing of the pollutant
• Used as simulations to estimate the probability of increased nutrient loads from land cover composition
• A screening approach due to assumptions
67
EMC modeling approach
EMC grid Annual runoff grid
Cumulative runoff grid
Stream flow grid
Pollutant output grid
*
/ =
=
Annual runoff grid
68
Limitations with stream flow model
• lack of interception, evapotranspiraiton, baseflow from groundwater
• rate of areal distribution of rainfall
• monthly averages was crude
• Limited to natural systems (no dams or impoundments)
69
Limitations with EMC approach
• year to year changes in precipitation
• soil type
• slope and slope morphology (convex, concave)
• geology
• cropping practices
• timing of fertilizer application relative to precipitation events
• density of impervious surface
70
71
WCMS ArcGIS 9 extension
72
Further reading
Jenson S. K. and J. O. Domingue. 1988. Extracting Topographic Structure from Digital Elevation Data for Geographic Information Systems Analysis, Photogrametric Engineering and Remote Sensing. Vol. 54, No. 11, November 1988, pp. 1593-1600.
Haith A. D and L.L Shoemaker. 1987 Generalized Watershed Loading Functions for Stream Flow Nutrients. Water Resources Bulletin, American Water Resources Association, Vol 23, No. 3. Pp 471 – 477.
Mark, D. M. 1988. ‘Network Models in Geomorphology’, Modeling in Geomorphological Systems. John Wiley.
Olivera, F., R. J. Chareneau and D. R. Maidment. 1996. CRWR Online Report 96-4: Spatially Distributed Modeling of Storm Runoff and Non-Point Source Pollution Using GIS.
Saunders, W. K. and D. R. Maidment (1996), A GIS Assessment of Nonpoint Pollution in the San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin, Center for Research in Water Resources Online Report 96-1, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Saunders, W. K. (1999) Preparation of DEMS for use in Environmental Modeling Analysis, In: Conference Proceedings: 1999 ESRI User Conference, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.
Shreve, R. L. 1966. Statistical Law of Stream Number, Journal of Geology. Vol. 74, pp. 17-37. Strahler, A. N. 1957. Quanitative Analysis of Watershed Geomorphology. Transactions of the American
Geophysical Union. Vol. 8, Number 6, pp. 913-920. Tarboton, D. G., R. L. Bras, I. Rodriquez-Iturbe. 1991. On the Extraction of Channel Networks from Digital
Elevation Data, Hydrological Processes. Vol. 5, pp. 81-100. Reed, S.M., and D.R. Maidment. 1995. CRWR Online Report 95-3: A GIS Procedure for Merging NEXRAD
Precipitation Data and Digital Elevation Models to Determine Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Parameters.