admin. law penal provi to effectivity of admin rules and regulations

Upload: sarah-jane-shae-o-semblante

Post on 04-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    1/18

    Synopsis

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    2/18

    Penal Rules and RegulationsAdministrative bodies have the authority

    to issue administrative regulation which

    are penal in nature where the law itself

    makes the violation of the administrativeregulation punishable and provides for its

    penalty.

    - The making of an act a crime is purely

    legislative, which cannot be delegated.

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    3/18

    People v. SantosThe conditional clause in question supplies

    a defect of the law, extending it. This is equivalent tolegislating on the matter, a power which has notbeen and cannot be delegated to him, it being

    exclusively reserved to the then PhilippineLegislature by the Jones Law, and now to theNational Assembly by the Constitution of the

    Philippines. Such act constitutes not only an excess of

    the regulatory power conferred upon the Secretary ofAgriculture and Commerce, but also an exercise of a

    legislative power which he does not have, and

    therefore said conditional clause is null and voidand without effect.

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    4/18

    People v. Que Po Lya

    Sec. 11, Revised Administrative Code:

    'statutes passed by Congress shall, in

    the absence of special provision, take

    effect at the beginning of the fifteenth day

    after the completion of the publication of

    the statute in the Official Gazette. (samegoes with Art. 2 of New Civil Code)

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    5/18

    If as a matter of fact Circular No. 20

    had not been published as required bylaw before its violation, then in theeyes of the law there was no such

    circular to be violated andconsequently appellant committed no

    violation of the circular or committed any

    offense.

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    6/18

    People v. Maceren

    The lawmaking body cannotdelegate to an executive official thepower to declare what acts shouldconstitute an offense. It can authorizethe issuance of regulations and the

    imposition of the penalty provided for in

    the law itself.

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    7/18

    Force and Effect of Administrative

    Rules and RegulationsIn order to be valid, it must be:

    1. Germane to the objects and purposesof the law

    2. Conform to the standards that the lawprescribes

    3. Reasonable and must be related solelyto carrying into effect the generalprovisions of the law.

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    8/18

    Peralta v. CSC

    INTERPRETATIVE RULE:

    When an administrative or executiveagency renders an opinion or issues astatement of policy, it merely interprets apre-existing law; and the administrativeinterpretation of the law is at best advisory,

    for it is the courts that finally determine whatthe law means. It has also been held thatinterpretative regulations need not bepublished.

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    9/18

    ADMINISTRATIVE CONSTRUCTION;

    EFFECT:

    Administrative construction is not

    necessarily binding upon the courts.

    Action of an administrative agency maybe disturbed or set aside by the judicial

    department if there is an error of law, or

    abuse of power or lack of jurisdiction orgrave abuse of discretion clearly

    conflicting with either the letter or the

    spirit of a legislative enactment.

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    10/18

    Javellana v. DILG

    As a matter of policy, this Court accordsgreat respect to the decisions and/oractions of administrative authoritiesnot only because of the doctrine of

    separation of powers but also for

    their presumedknowledgeability and expertise in the

    enforcement of laws and regulationsentrusted to their jurisdiction. There was

    no grave abuse of authority on the part of

    the DILG

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    11/18

    Requirements of Notice and

    HearingAdministrative rules and regulations must

    also be published if their purpose is to

    enforce or implement existing law

    pursuant to a valid delegation.

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    12/18

    CIR v. CAAn administrative rule is merely interpretative in

    nature, its applicability needs nothing further than its

    bare issuance for it gives no real consequence more

    than what the law itself has already prescribed. When,

    upon the other hand, the administrative rule goesbeyond merely providing for the means that canfacilitate or render least cumbersome theimplementation of the law but substantially adds toor increases the burden of those governed, it

    behooves the agency to accord at least to thosedirectly affected a chance to be heard, andthereafter to be duly informed, before that newissuance is given the force and effect of law.

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    13/18

    Construction of Administrative

    Rules and RegulationsAXIOMS:

    a. If the implementing rules and

    regulations are issued in excess of the

    rule-making authority of the

    administrative agency, they are without

    binding effect upon the courts.

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    14/18

    b. The administrative regulation, which is

    intended only to supplement the law,

    cannot prevail against the law itself as

    the court has interpreted it.

    c. Rules and regulations must be

    reasonable and fairly adopted to secure

    the end view.

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    15/18

    Victorias Milling v. SSC

    ADMINISTRATIVE RULE ANDREGULATION

    v.

    ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    16/18

    Administrative Ruleor Regulation

    OA new law with theforce and effect of law

    is made

    O

    A rule is binding uponthe courts so long as

    the procedure fixed for

    its promulgation is

    followed and its scopeis within the statutory

    authority granted by the

    legislature

    Administrative

    Interpretation

    OMere interpretation

    of a pre-existing law

    OAt best, advisory, forit is the courts that

    finally determine what

    the law means

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    17/18

    NFA v. MASADA SecurityThe general rule is that construction of a statute by

    an administrative agency charged with the task of

    interpreting or applying the same is entitled to great weight

    and respect. The COURT, HOWEVER, IS NOT BOUND TO

    APPLY SAID RULE WHERE SUCH EXECUTIVEINTERPRETATION, IS CLEARLY ERRONEOUS, ORWHEN THERE IS NO AMBIGUITY IN THE LAWINTERPRETED, OR WHEN THE LANGUAGE OF THEWORDS USED IS CLEAR AND PLAIN, AS IN THE CASEAT BAR. Besides, administrative interpretations are at bestadvisory for it is the Court that finally determines what thelaw means. Hence, the interpretation given by the labor

    agencies in the instant case which went as far as

    supplementing what is otherwise not stated in the lawcannot bind this Court.

  • 7/30/2019 Admin. Law Penal Provi to Effectivity of Admin Rules and regulations

    18/18

    SMGC v. Office of the President

    Administrative rule or regulation, inorder to be valid, must not contradictbut conform to the provisions of the

    enabling law.For it is axiomatic that administrative rulesderive their validity from the statute that

    they are intended to implement. Any rulewhich is not consistent with statute itself isnull and void.