Adaptation planning for

action and investment

TEM-A 2018

10 May 2018 | Bonn, Germany

Session Overview

1. Status and good practices in accessing GCF support for Adaptation Planning

2. Country insight:

• Antigua and Barbuda (Lia Nicholson)• Liberia (Benjamin Karmorh)• Uruguay (Ignacio Lorenzo)

3. Adaptation Fund insight (Daouda Ndiaye)

4. Discussants’ insights (European Investment Bank, Teltabba, NAP GSP)

5. Open discussion

6. Summary (Carolina Fuentes, GCF)

Status of GCF Adaptation Planning Support

Antigua & Barbuda

DRC

Madagascar

Liberia

PakistanNepal

Mongolia

Tanzania

Colombia

Uruguay

Argentina

Ecuador

Armenia

Niger

Dominican Republic

Bosnia & Herzegovina

Kenya

Mauritania

Malawi

Zimbabwe

Bangladesh

BeninCosta Rica

Gabon

Honduras

Serbia

South Sudan

Sudan

Swaziland

Mali

UzbekistanMontenegro

Egypt

Myanmar

Cote d’Ivoire

Bhutan

Ghana

NigeriaCameroon

Seychelle

Albania

Iraq

Mauritius

PNG

GuatemalaDominica

Lesotho

Uganda

Haiti

Pending resubmission

Status on 30 April 2018 50 20 (14+6) 5 25

Status on 1 Jan 2018 40 8 (3+5) 14 18

Mexico

Liberia – Adaptation Planning process launch - 13 March

Country programming process for high quality pipelines that GCF can finance

GCF Programming

READINESS(including adaptation planning)

GCF SUPPORT

PROJECT PREPAR-ATION

FUNDING PROPOSALS

NDCs

Partners to support implementation

Capacity needs

COUNTRY VISION

CLIMATE IMPACT• Emission

reductions• Increased

resilience

Development priorities

ProjectConceptNotes

Accredited Entities

Readiness Delivery Partners

1a) Climate impacts the project/programme aims to address

1b) Vulnerabilities and risks of these climate impacts

2) Prioritized interventions based on analysis of most effective options

3) Integration into broader domestic and international policy and decision-making

Elements of Climate Adaptaton Rationale

10 Review Criteriabased on good practices

1. Focus strategically within

a national vision

2. Plan to address specific climate

impacts and vulnerabilities

3. Develop financing strategy

for each adaptation priority

4. Articulate theory of change

5. Avoid duplication of effort

6. Engage stakeholders proactively

7. Build gender considerations

8. Cultivate private sector investment

9. Monitor and report

systematically

10. Coherence and complementarity with other funds

10 Review Criteriabased on good practices

1. Focus strategically within

a national vision

2. Plan to address specific climate

impacts and vulnerabilities

3. Develop financing strategy

for each adaptation priority

4. Articulate theory of change

5. Avoid duplication of effort

6. Engage stakeholders proactively

7. Build gender considerations

8. Cultivate private sector investment

9. Monitor and report

systematically

10. Coherence and complementarity with other funds

Focus questions:

1. How can countries use GCF adaptation planning support to

a) produce and communicate a scientific and economic case for attracting investment?

a) catalyse action and investment for adaptation at a local level?

2. How can adaptation planning enable investment decision-making by the Adaptation Fund and other sources of adaptation finance?

Objectives:

1. Share experiences of countries in adaptation planning to catalyse action and finance

2. Update on status and good practices in accessing GCF resources for adaptation planning

3. Gain insight about how adaptation planning can attract finance climate financiers

GCF Background: Four Areas of Readiness Support

1. NDA strengthening

2. Strategic frameworks

3. Support for direct access entities

4. Adaptation planning processesUp to USD 3M percountry (not per year)

Up to USD 1M percountry per year

Options to delivery GCF NAP support

GCF can provide technical assistance to NDAs to assist in drafting proposals for NAP and PPF support.

Deliver Partner Options:

• National• International• Regional

• Not accredited: FMCA required • Accredited Entities: FMCA not required

Status: GCF NAP Support

Moving forwards

Increase # of approved proposals (30+ in 2018)

Increase quality and impact to catalyse implementation

Support NDAs with national delivery partners

Progress

Established transparent review criteria

Improved timelines and consistency of feedback

Communicated good practices through 20+ workshops and webinars of LEG, NAP GSP,

NAP GN, and others

Challenges

Proposals design based on national context

Plan to attract financing for implementation

Diversity of delivery partners