action plan of body 0836-049

Upload: shuklahouse

Post on 04-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    1/21

    Action Plan of Body 0836-049

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    2/21

    Part Name: Body 0836-049 Qty Found NG: 1 Pc.

    Problem: Thread Damaged, with Major

    Dia being observed 9.25 MM.

    Problem

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    3/21

    A1 Blanking on Traub

    A2 Centre-Less Grinding

    A4

    End-Mill Drilling

    Thread-Rolling

    Step-Drilling

    A3

    Chamfer

    Final inspection & PA11

    Flat-Drilling

    A5

    A6

    A7

    Present Process Se

    Looking at the NG Component it

    concluded that such component

    generated at either stage.

    Re-ThreadingA8

    Free-Hand DrillingA9

    PlatingA10

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    4/21

    Understanding The

    - The Thread is damaged, wherein the major OD of the component is observed as 9

    MM.

    - Only the last couple of threads are in shape with the rest being completely damage

    Thread Damaged

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    5/21

    A1 Blanking on Traub

    A2 Centre-Less Grinding

    A4

    End-Mill Drilling

    Thread-Rolling

    Step-Drilling

    A3

    Chamfer

    Final inspection & PA11

    Flat-Drilling

    A5

    A6

    A7

    Problemati

    Re-ThreadingA8

    Free-Hand DrillingA9

    PlatingA10

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    6/21

    Thread-Rolling Operation

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    7/21

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    8/21

    Fault Analysis (Man)

    S. No Potential Cause Validation

    1 Unskilled Operator Checked skill status of operator & found upto thedesired level, with a clear understanding of the end

    requirement.

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    9/21

    Fault Analysis (Method)

    S. No Potential Cause Validation

    1 Rolling Method Incorrect Observed that the process was correct, as per theindustry standards.

    2 Coolant Flow Incorrect Coolant flow was correct, and was flowing evenly

    on the surface

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    10/21

    Fault Analysis (Machine)

    S. No Potential Cause Validation

    1 Cycle Time (Spark Out)Inconsistent

    Spark Out Time, timer controlled, and timer workingfine.

    2 Hydraulic Pressure

    Inconsistent

    Pressure Controller working fine.

    3 Roll Configuration Incorrect Stood correct with regards to the industry standard,

    and the required Ra Value

    4 Stopper Alignment

    Incorrect

    Correct, was covering the entire surface of the

    component. Height also correct.

    5 Hardness of the Roll

    Incorrect

    Was correct as per the required hardness

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    11/21

    Fault Analysis (Material)

    S. No Potential Cause Validation

    1 Variation in the Hardness Checked, and found it correct as per requirement.

    2 Variation in the Dimensions Checked, and found it correct as per requirement.

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    12/21

    Re-Threading Operation

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    13/21

    METHODMATERIAL

    UNSKILLED OPERATOR

    Cause And Effect Diagram

    Any Dimensional

    Variation

    Re-Threading

    Method Incorrect

    MACHINE MAN

    Die- Size Incorrect

    Cycle Time Inconsistent

    Die-Setting Incorrect

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    14/21

    Fault Analysis (Man)

    S. No Potential Cause Validation

    1 Unskilled Operator Checked skill status of operator & found upto thedesired level, with a clear understanding of the end

    requirement.

    2

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    15/21

    Fault Analysis (Method)

    S. No Potential Cause Validation

    1 Re-Threading MethodIncorrect

    Observed that the process was correct, as perthe industry standards. However, since the hand

    pressure is erratic, too much of pressure results

    in thread damage.

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    16/21

    Fault Analysis (Material)

    S. No Potential Cause Validation

    1 Variation in the Dimensions Checked, and found that the profile of the InputThread was correct, with the Gauge Qualifying.

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    17/21

    Fault Analysis (Machine)

    S. No Potential Cause Validation

    1 Cycle Time (Spark Out)Inconsistent

    Spark Out Time, is correct, with the Operatorfollowing the required parameters

    2 Die-Size Incorrect Correct.

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    18/21

    Why-Why Analysis (FOR OCCURRENCE

    Thread flat (major dia. 9.25 observed 9.769.96.

    Because of Thread damage .

    Because part resting tilted .

    Because component alignment was disturbed .

    Because of uneven hand pressure .

    Because rethreading is a manual process .

    Why

    Why

    Why

    Why

    Why

    Why

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    19/21

    Why-Why Analysis (FOR DETECTION)

    Thread flat (major dia. Oversize )

    Because of Thread damage .

    Setting part mixed with ok parts .

    Because of Operator lack of awareness .

    Why

    Why

    Why

    Why

    Why

    Why

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    20/21

    Analysis & Counter

    - Results showed that it was at the time of Setting, that such NG Piece could get

    generated.

    1. Operators at re-Threading once again trained on how to handle Setting

    Rejections.

    2. Operators at Threading, also proactively trained on how to handle SettingRejections.

    3. Operators at Inspection trained to remove such components.

    Thread-Damage

  • 8/13/2019 Action Plan of BODY 0836-049

    21/21

    THANK YOU