academic library internet information provision model: using toolbars and web 2.0 applications to...

13
Academic Library Internet Information Provision Model: Using Toolbars and Web 2.0 Applications to Augment Subject Reference E. Michael Wilson, MSLS Engineering Librarian Alden Library Ohio University

Upload: caitlin-clarke

Post on 18-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Academic Library Internet Information Provision Model: Using Toolbars and Web 2.0 Applications

to Augment Subject Reference

E. Michael Wilson, MSLSEngineering LibrarianAlden LibraryOhio University

Using the Website for Research?

ConsortialCatalog Results

Using the Website for Research?

Home page Catalog Search Results

Articles InfoTree Database Results

Find It!Services InterlibraryLoan

Request

ResearchGuides

Wikis ENGR Wiki

MANY DATABASES

StatisticsARL Libraries Surveyed 88    

Component Libraries Percentage Notes

Federated Searching 9 10.23% Located on Home Page

       

Library Catalog 88 100.00% Located on Home Page

Catalog Search Box 73 82.95% Located on Home Page

       

Databases Link 84 95.45% Located on Home Page

Database/Article Search Box 39 44.32% Located on Home Page

Databases Listed Alphabetically 83 94.32% Anywhere in Web Site

Databases Listed by Subject 83 94.32% Anywhere in Web Site

       

E-Mail Reference 88 100.00% Anywhere in Web Site

Telephone Reference 83 94.32% Anywhere in Web Site

Chat Provided 79 89.77% Anywhere in Web Site

Other Client (requires data from users) 30 34.09% Anywhere in Web Site

Widget Based Chat (non-Meebo) 21 23.86% Anywhere in Web Site

Meebo Based Chat 24 27.27% Anywhere in Web Site

Account Based Chat (AIM/ICQ/Google/Yahoo/MSN)

4 4.55% Anywhere in Web Site

Protected Chat (Account/Password) 3 3.41% Anywhere in Web Site

Text a Librarian 12 13.64% Anywhere in Web Site

Skype a Librarian 2 2.27% Anywhere in Web Site

       

Widget Components 12 13.64% Located on Home Page

Academic Library Internet Information Provision Model

A Proposed Google Research Model

Pros:Familiar.Quick.Easy.

Cons:Veracity.Unwieldy.

Assessment of Needed Research Tool

Ohio University Technology Survey 2008◦3648 students.

Roughly 17% of student population.

◦78.4% or 2751 would use toolbars for research.

◦Browser Preference. Firefox 42.4%. Internet Explorer 42.0%. Safari 14.0%.

Toolbar Video

Engineering Subject Toolbar Facts

Prototype Toolbar.◦Adopted instantly.

Faculty Research Sessions.Engineering Toolbar Installations.

◦210 Since January 2008.Control – Database Usage.

◦Proxy.◦Free Resources.

Maintenance.◦Toolbar Auto-Updates.

Subject Toolbar Information Provision Model

Research Portal.Located in Browser.Enables Google Style Searching.IntegratedInstruction Model

Guesstimates

Guesstimates

ConclusionConsider Applying the Proposed ModelAssess Organizational Capabilities.

◦Resources.◦Personnel

Examine Research Structure.Create Customized Model.Implement Needed Tools.

◦Simplify.◦Assess.◦ Improve.