abstract

208
Testing of two variants of the harmonic inversion method on the territory of the eastern part of Slovakia

Upload: azuka

Post on 27-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Testing of two variants of the harmonic inversion method on the territory of the eastern part of Slovakia. Abstract. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Abstract

Testing of two variants of the harmonic inversion method on the

territory of the eastern part of Slovakia

Page 2: Abstract

The aim of this contribution is to compare two variants of the harmonic inversion method on the territory of the eastern part of Slovakia. The older variant uses in the determination of the position and shape of anomalousbodies the characteristic density, the new one uses the quasigravitation.Both the characteristic density and the quasigravitation are smooth functions obtained from the surface gravitational field by a linear integral transformation. Both functions restore the 3-dimensional distribution of sources of gravitational field that is hidden in the surface gravitational field. The comparison of these two variants is accompanied by numerous figures.

Abstract

Page 3: Abstract

These versions of harmonic inversion method are suitable for the case of planarEarth surface. This means that it was not accounted for:

1. the ellipsoidal shape of the Earth;2. the topography.

In order to avoid the problem in the point 2, the original gravimetric data werecontinued downwards to the zero height above the sea level by the method ofXia J., Sprowl D.R., 1991: Correction of topographic distortion in gravity data,Geophysics, 56, 537-541.

Introduction

Page 4: Abstract

Inverse gravimetric problem

:0z 0),,( zyx

),,(),,(d),( zyxzyyxxGVyxa

2/3222 )(κ),,(

zyxz

zyxG

),( yxa

),,( zyx

Density

Surface gravitation

Input:

Output:

(1)

Page 5: Abstract

Harmonic inversion method

The inverse problem of gravimetry has infinitely many solutions. In order toobtain a reasonable solution(s), the following strategy was proposed:

1. to find the simplest possible solution;2. to find some realistic solution(s).

The simplest solution is defined as the maximally smooth density generatingthe given surface gravitation and having the extrema-conserving property;this density is a linear functional of the surface gravitation.

The realistic solution is defined as a partially constant density; in other words,the calculation domain is divided in several subdomains and in each of thesesubdomains the density is a constant.

Page 6: Abstract

The simplest solution described above is called the characteristic density (of the given surface gravitation); thus it satisfies the following conditions:

for the smallest possible

2. It is a linear integral transformation of the surface gravitation:

3. For the gravitational field of a point source, it has its main extremum at the point source.

0),,( zyxk k

),(),,(d),,(:0 yxazyyxxKSzyxz

Characteristic density

1. It is the maximally smooth density generating the given surface gravitation:

Page 7: Abstract

π2

0)sin,cos(d

π21

),,( uyuxauyxa

),,(1

)(d

πκ20

),,(:00 2/722

44

uyxauzu

zuuzyxz uu

4k

(2)

Formula for the characteristic density

These conditions define uniquely the characteristic density; it will be denoted . In the condition 1 we have , thus the characteristic density isa tetraharmonic function. Formula for this density from the condition 2 reads

),,( zyx

Details can be found in:Pohánka V., 2001: Application of the harmonic inversion method to theKolárovo gravity anomaly, Contr. Geophys. Inst. SAS, 31, 603-620.

Page 8: Abstract

Input data

Input was represented by 71821 points (coordinates x, y, gravitation a).

The data were interpolated and extrapolated into a regular net of points in therectangle 300 × 240 km with the step 0.5 km and the centre at 48º49'20" N,21º16'20" E (totally 289081 points).

The calculation domain was chosen as the rectangular prism whose upperboundary was the rectangle 200 × 140 km with the same centre as above andwhose lower boundary was at the depth 50 km; the step in the depth was again0.5 km (totally 401 × 281 × 100 = 11268100 points).

Page 9: Abstract
Page 10: Abstract
Page 11: Abstract
Page 12: Abstract
Page 13: Abstract
Page 14: Abstract
Page 15: Abstract
Page 16: Abstract
Page 17: Abstract
Page 18: Abstract
Page 19: Abstract
Page 20: Abstract
Page 21: Abstract
Page 22: Abstract
Page 23: Abstract
Page 24: Abstract
Page 25: Abstract
Page 26: Abstract
Page 27: Abstract
Page 28: Abstract
Page 29: Abstract
Page 30: Abstract
Page 31: Abstract
Page 32: Abstract
Page 33: Abstract
Page 34: Abstract
Page 35: Abstract
Page 36: Abstract
Page 37: Abstract
Page 38: Abstract
Page 39: Abstract
Page 40: Abstract
Page 41: Abstract
Page 42: Abstract
Page 43: Abstract
Page 44: Abstract
Page 45: Abstract
Page 46: Abstract
Page 47: Abstract
Page 48: Abstract
Page 49: Abstract
Page 50: Abstract
Page 51: Abstract
Page 52: Abstract
Page 53: Abstract
Page 54: Abstract
Page 55: Abstract

Characteristic density is a smooth function and thus it is not a realistic solutionof the inverse problem.

Characteristic density contains the same amount of information as the surfacegravitation, but in another form:the information about the distribution of the sources of gravitational field withdepth is hidden in the 2-dimensional surface gravitation, but it is restored inthe 3-dimensional characteristic density.

The extrema-conserving property of the characteristic density implies that foreach domain where this density is positive (negative), there has to exist ananomalous body with positive (negative) difference density located roughlyin this domain.

This shows that the characteristic density is an important tool for finding therealistic solutions of the inverse problem.

Significance of the characteristic density

Page 56: Abstract

Multi-domain density

The realistic solution of the inverse problem can be represented by a multi-domain density; this is the density that is constant in each of the domains intowhich the halfspace is divided.

For any multi-domain density , we calculate the surface gravitation generated by this density and then the corresponding characteristicdensity .Finally, we calculate the residual surface gravitation

0z

),,( zyxm),( yxam

),,( zyxm

),(),(),( yxayxayxa mr

and the residual characteristic density

),,(),,(),,( zyxzyxzyx mr .

This quantity is identically zero if the density is a solution of theinverse problem.

),,( zyxm

Page 57: Abstract

Determination of the realistic solution

If the residual characteristic density corresponding to the chosen multi-domaindensity is nonzero, the latter density has to be changed.This is done by changing the boundaries of the domains; the values of densityin these domains remain unchanged.

The changing of boundaries of particular domains is performed as follows:The whole calculation domain is divided into elementary cubic cells; each ofthese cells has its value of density. The cell is called a boundary cell just ifat least one of the neighbouring cells has a different value of density; the othercells are called the interior ones.

For each boundary cell, if the residual characteristic density in its centre ispositive (negative), the value of density of this cell is changed to the nearesthigher (lower) value from among its neighbours (if such neighbour exists).

The result of these changes is the new multi-domain density.

Page 58: Abstract

Zero model

The surface gravitation generated by any infinite horizontal layer with constantdensity is a constant function. The characteristic density corresponding to theconstant surface gravitation is identically zero.

This means that the infinite horizontal layers with constant density cannot befound if the only input is the surface gravitation. Therefore, the number andparameters of these layers have to be known in advance.

The multi-domain density representing the layered calculation domain is calledthe zero model.

The zero model serves as a reference model for any other models:The calculation of surface gravitation generated by any multi-domain densityhas to use the difference density, which is equal to the difference of the actualdensity and the value of the density of the zero model corresponding to thesame depth.

Page 59: Abstract

Starting model

The calculation of shapes of individual domains of the multi-domain densityaccording to the above description has to start from some simple multi-domaindensity; the latter is called the starting model.

The starting model is created from the zero model by changing the value ofdensity in some number of individual cells; these cells are called the germs(of the future domains to be created from these cells in the calculation process).

For any local extremum of the original characteristic density, a single germis created at the same position as this extremum. The density value of eachgerm is a free parameter and has to be entered; for the positive (negative)value of the extremum, the density of the germ has to be greater (lower) thanthe density of the zero model at this depth.

The suitable value of the difference density of the germ is of the order of thevalue of the characteristic density of this germ.

Page 60: Abstract

Calculation

The calculation domain was divided into 401 × 281 × 100 = 11268100 cells.

The layers of the zero model were defined as follows:

for the depth 0 - 3 km the density is 2680 kg / m³, 3 - 6 km 2700 kg / m³, 6 - 9 km 2720 kg / m³, 9 - 12 km 2740 kg / m³, 12 - 15 km 2760 kg / m³, 15 - 18 km 2780 kg / m³, 18 - 32 km 3000 kg / m³, > 32 km 3300 kg / m³.

The starting model had 1492 germs of anomalous bodies with densities in therange 2140 – 3300 kg / m³.

Page 61: Abstract

Results

The calculations were performed on the Origin 2000 supercomputer of theComputing Centre of the Slovak Academy of Sciences.

The calculation of the characteristic density took 2.08 hours of CPU time.

The calculation of the resulting multi-domain density consisted of 384 iterationsteps and it took 930.81 hours of CPU time.

Page 62: Abstract
Page 63: Abstract
Page 64: Abstract
Page 65: Abstract
Page 66: Abstract
Page 67: Abstract
Page 68: Abstract
Page 69: Abstract
Page 70: Abstract
Page 71: Abstract
Page 72: Abstract
Page 73: Abstract
Page 74: Abstract
Page 75: Abstract
Page 76: Abstract
Page 77: Abstract
Page 78: Abstract
Page 79: Abstract
Page 80: Abstract
Page 81: Abstract
Page 82: Abstract
Page 83: Abstract
Page 84: Abstract
Page 85: Abstract
Page 86: Abstract
Page 87: Abstract
Page 88: Abstract
Page 89: Abstract
Page 90: Abstract
Page 91: Abstract
Page 92: Abstract
Page 93: Abstract
Page 94: Abstract
Page 95: Abstract
Page 96: Abstract
Page 97: Abstract
Page 98: Abstract
Page 99: Abstract
Page 100: Abstract
Page 101: Abstract
Page 102: Abstract
Page 103: Abstract
Page 104: Abstract
Page 105: Abstract
Page 106: Abstract
Page 107: Abstract
Page 108: Abstract

Disadvantages of the described method

Harmonic inversion method using the characteristic density cannot be easilygeneralized for the case of the arbitrary surface of Earth. This is because it isdifficult to find the exact formula for calculation of the characteristic densityin such a case.

Another disadvantage is that the formula for calculation of the characteristicdensity contains the second derivative of the surface data, what increases thenumerical errors.

However, if we examine the procedure for the determination of the realisticsolution, we see that there was nowhere used the fact that the characteristicdensity is a solution of the inverse problem. The determination of the realisticsolution was enabled by the extrema-conserving property of the characteristicdensity (of course, there was also important the maximal smoothness of thecharacteristic density and its linear dependence on the surface gravitation).

Page 109: Abstract

Therefore, we can use for the determination of the realistic solution anyfunction having the above mentioned properties. We shall call such a functionthe information function (for the given surface gravitation); this is because itgives us the 3-dimensional information needed for the calculation of realisticsolutions.

The strategy for finding the solution of the inverse problem is thus as follows:

1. to find the information function;2. to find some realistic solution(s).

The information function is defined as the maximally smooth function havingthe extrema-conserving property and depending linearly on the surfacegravitation. The realistic solution is the same as before.

Advanced harmonic inversion method

Page 110: Abstract

The information function (for the given surface gravitation) has to satisfy the following conditions:

for the smallest possible

2. It is a linear integral transformation of the surface gravitation:

3. For the gravitational field of a point source, it has its main extremum at the point source.

0),,( zyxfk k

),(),,(d),,(:0 yxazyyxxLSzyxfz

Information function

1. It is a maximally smooth function:

Page 111: Abstract

π2

0)sin,cos(d

π21

),,( uyuxauyxa

),,()(

d8),,(:00 2/522

32

uyxazuzu

uzyxqz u

(3)

Formula for the quasigravitation

),,( zyxq

We choose the information function to have the same dimension as thesurface gravitation; it will be therefore called the quasigravitation.

The quasigravitation is a triharmonic function (thus in thecondition 1) and is expressed by the formula

3k

The quasigravitation is normalized such that for a single point source thelocal extrema of the surface gravitation and quasigravitation have the samevalue.

Page 112: Abstract
Page 113: Abstract
Page 114: Abstract
Page 115: Abstract
Page 116: Abstract
Page 117: Abstract
Page 118: Abstract
Page 119: Abstract
Page 120: Abstract
Page 121: Abstract
Page 122: Abstract
Page 123: Abstract
Page 124: Abstract
Page 125: Abstract
Page 126: Abstract
Page 127: Abstract
Page 128: Abstract
Page 129: Abstract
Page 130: Abstract
Page 131: Abstract
Page 132: Abstract
Page 133: Abstract
Page 134: Abstract
Page 135: Abstract
Page 136: Abstract
Page 137: Abstract
Page 138: Abstract
Page 139: Abstract
Page 140: Abstract
Page 141: Abstract
Page 142: Abstract
Page 143: Abstract
Page 144: Abstract
Page 145: Abstract
Page 146: Abstract
Page 147: Abstract
Page 148: Abstract
Page 149: Abstract
Page 150: Abstract
Page 151: Abstract
Page 152: Abstract
Page 153: Abstract
Page 154: Abstract
Page 155: Abstract
Page 156: Abstract
Page 157: Abstract
Page 158: Abstract

Multi-domain density

),,( zyxm),( yxam

),,( zyxqm

),(),(),( yxayxayxa mr

and the residual quasigravitation

),,(),,(),,( zyxqzyxqzyxq mr .

This quantity is identically zero if the density is a solution of theinverse problem.

),,( zyxm

As in the previous case, the realistic solution of the inverse problem can berepresented by a multi-domain density.

For any multi-domain density , we calculate the surface gravitation generated by this density and then the corresponding quasigravitation .Finally, we calculate the residual surface gravitation

Page 159: Abstract

Determination of the realistic solution

If the residual quasigravitation corresponding to the chosen multi-domaindensity is nonzero, this density has to be changed.As in the previous case, this is done by changing the boundaries of thedomains; the values of density in these domains remain unchanged.

For each boundary cell, if the residual quasigravitation in its centre ispositive (negative), the value of density of this cell is changed to the nearesthigher (lower) value from among its neighbours (if such neighbour exists).

The result of these changes is the new multi-domain density.

Page 160: Abstract

Zero and starting models

The surface gravitation generated by any infinite horizontal layer with constantdensity is a constant function. The quasigravitation corresponding to theconstant surface gravitation is identically zero.

This means that the infinite horizontal layers with constant density cannot befound if the only input is the surface gravitation. Therefore, the number andparameters of these layers have to be known in advance.

Thus, as in the previous case, we have to choose the zero model which servesas a reference model for any other models and the starting model by creatingthe germs of the future domains.

For any local extremum of the original quasigravitation, a single germis created at the same position as this extremum. The suitable value of thedifference density of the germ can be calculated from the value of thequasigravitation of this germ.

Page 161: Abstract

Calculation

The calculation domain was divided into 401 × 281 × 100 = 11268100 cells.

The layers of the zero model were defined as follows:

for the depth 0 - 3 km the density is 2680 kg / m³, 3 - 6 km 2700 kg / m³, 6 - 9 km 2720 kg / m³, 9 - 12 km 2740 kg / m³, 12 - 15 km 2760 kg / m³, 15 - 18 km 2780 kg / m³, 18 - 32 km 3000 kg / m³, > 32 km 3300 kg / m³.

The starting model had 793 germs of anomalous bodies with densities in therange 2140 – 3300 kg / m³.

Page 162: Abstract

Results

The calculations were performed on the Origin 2000 supercomputer of theComputing Centre of the Slovak Academy of Sciences.

The calculation of the quasigravitation took 2.08 hours of CPU time.

The calculation of the resulting multi-domain density consisted of 288 iterationsteps and it took 1113.10 hours of CPU time.

Page 163: Abstract
Page 164: Abstract
Page 165: Abstract
Page 166: Abstract
Page 167: Abstract
Page 168: Abstract
Page 169: Abstract
Page 170: Abstract
Page 171: Abstract
Page 172: Abstract
Page 173: Abstract
Page 174: Abstract
Page 175: Abstract
Page 176: Abstract
Page 177: Abstract
Page 178: Abstract
Page 179: Abstract
Page 180: Abstract
Page 181: Abstract
Page 182: Abstract
Page 183: Abstract
Page 184: Abstract
Page 185: Abstract
Page 186: Abstract
Page 187: Abstract
Page 188: Abstract
Page 189: Abstract
Page 190: Abstract
Page 191: Abstract
Page 192: Abstract
Page 193: Abstract
Page 194: Abstract
Page 195: Abstract
Page 196: Abstract
Page 197: Abstract
Page 198: Abstract
Page 199: Abstract
Page 200: Abstract
Page 201: Abstract
Page 202: Abstract
Page 203: Abstract
Page 204: Abstract
Page 205: Abstract
Page 206: Abstract
Page 207: Abstract
Page 208: Abstract