aapg_2005_newsoftwareforwell2wellcorrelation

3
Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract We have developed a research prototype PC application, Well2Well, which enables improved well-to-well correlation, especially when coupled with spectroscopy log data. The advantage of using spectroscopic log data is the absolute values of the chemical concentrations of the most important rock-forming chemical elements. The full list available includes elements from the Elemental Capture Spectroscopy (ECS) and Natural Gamma Ray Spectroscopy (NGS, HNGS) sondes. This is in contrast to the traditional use of gamma ray/spontaneous potential and resistivity data, which are at least as sensitive to the fluids as to the rock. Elements that are believed to be more geologically important can be included in the analysis and weighted according to the user’s preference, while less important trace elements such as thorium and uranium, which are major components of the gamma ray, may be excluded. The input logs can be preprocessed and smoothed with edge-preserving algorithms to make the correlation results more stable. These well-to-well depth correlations rely on the Dynamic Programming algorithm, inspired by the gene- matching algorithms used in biology, which computes a log signature mismatch matrix between a pair of wells and then finds the best correlation path thanks to an optimal path search through that matrix. No commercial plans are yet made for this software. However, tests on multiple datasets from North America demonstrate high-fidelity well-to-well correlations on wells separated by several hundred meters, suggesting making our research prototype software is a very promising geological characterization tool. New Software For Well-To-Well Correlation Of Spectroscopy Logs Piotr W. Mirowski Formerly Schlumberger-Doll Research Now Ph.D candidate, Courant Institute, New York University, NY [email protected] Michael Herron Schlumberger-Doll Research, Ridgefield, CT [email protected] Samuel D. Fluckiger, Schlumberger, Doha, Qatar [email protected] David S. McCormick Schlumberger-Doll Research, Cambridge, MA [email protected] Traditional Methods for Traditional Methods for Traditional Methods for Traditional Methods for Well Well Well Well- - -to to to to- - -Well Correlation Well Correlation Well Correlation Well Correlation Traditional Methods for Traditional Methods for Traditional Methods for Traditional Methods for Well Well Well Well- - -to to to to- - -Well Correlation Well Correlation Well Correlation Well Correlation Spectroscopy logs Spectroscopy logs Spectroscopy logs Spectroscopy logs Spectroscopy logs Spectroscopy logs Spectroscopy logs Spectroscopy logs Elemental concentration logs were obtained from the Elemental Capture Spectroscopy (ECS*) sonde. The ECS* sonde uses a standard 16-Ci [59.2 ¥ 1010-Bq] americium beryllium (AmBe) neutron source and a large bismuth germanate (BGO) detector to measure relative elemental yields based on neutron-induced capture gamma ray spectroscopy. The primary elements measured in both open and cased holes are for the formation elements silicon (Si), iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), sulfur (S), titanium (Ti), and gadolinium (Gd), chlorine (Cl), barium (Ba), and hydrogen (H). Wellsite processing uses the 254-channel gamma ray energy spectrum to produce dry-weight elements, lithology, and matrix properties. The first step involves spectral deconvolution of the composite gamma ray energy spectrum by using a set of elemental standards to produce relative elemental yields. The relative yields are then converted to dry-weight elemental concentration logs for the elements Si, Fe, Ca, S, Ti, and Gd using an oxides closure method. Matrix properties and quantitative dry-weight lithologies are then calculated from the dry-weight elemental fractions using empirical relationships derived from an extensive core chemistry and mineralogy database, and a real- time petrophysical analysis program. * Mark of Schlumberger Well-to-well correlation is an inexact art form. Correlations typically use only total gamma ray and resistivity. While lines are drawn connecting wells, the reasoning process for selecting the correlation points is usually unexplained. In the best case, the shapes of the curves are used for matching, but the absolute values are commonly not consi- dered. This figure shows an example of intrareservoir correlation based on electric logs and part of a complex study with a biostratigraphic approach in Venezuela (Rull, 1994). Authors Authors Authors Authors Authors Authors Authors Authors Manual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logs Manual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logs Manual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logs Manual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logs Manual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logs Manual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logs Manual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logs Manual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logs Introduction Introduction Introduction Introduction Introduction Introduction Introduction Introduction Nikita Seleznev Schlumberger-Doll Research, Ridgefield, CT [email protected] Automated well Automated well Automated well Automated well- - -to to to to- - -well correlation on gamma ray logs well correlation on gamma ray logs well correlation on gamma ray logs well correlation on gamma ray logs Automated well Automated well Automated well Automated well- - -to to to to- - -well correlation on gamma ray logs well correlation on gamma ray logs well correlation on gamma ray logs well correlation on gamma ray logs However, this algorithm has not been used with spectroscopy logs such as the dry weight percentage channel logs of Si, Ca, Fe, S, Ti, Gd or Al elements. The figure on the right illustrates the interface of our prototype software for applied to well-to-well correlation of standard gamma ray logs. As we will see in our poster, these results can be significantly improved. The algorithm presented here has already been applied for the well-to-well correlation of Gamma Ray, Neutron Porosity, Density, Spontaneous Potential, Spherically Focused Laterolog and Induction Log Medium logs (Le Nir et al., 1998, illustrated on the figure above). NPLC Detector Acquisition Cartridge Electronics Heat Sink Dewar Flask AmBe Source BGO Crystal And PMT Boron Sleeve Spectroscopy sonde

Upload: masab-toosy

Post on 20-Oct-2015

12 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A well To Well Corelation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AAPG_2005_NewSoftwareForWell2WellCorrelation

AbstractAbstractAbstractAbstractAbstractAbstractAbstractAbstract

We have developed a research prototype PC application, Well2Well, which enables improved well-to-well

correlation, especially when coupled with spectroscopy log data.

The advantage of using spectroscopic log data is the absolute values of the chemical concentrations of the

most important rock-forming chemical elements. The full list available includes elements from the

Elemental Capture Spectroscopy (ECS) and Natural Gamma Ray Spectroscopy (NGS, HNGS) sondes. This is

in contrast to the traditional use of gamma ray/spontaneous potential and resistivity data, which are at

least as sensitive to the fluids as to the rock. Elements that are believed to be more geologically important

can be included in the analysis and weighted according to the user’s preference, while less important

trace elements such as thorium and uranium, which are major components of the gamma ray, may be

excluded. The input logs can be preprocessed and smoothed with edge-preserving algorithms to make the

correlation results more stable.

These well-to-well depth correlations rely on the Dynamic Programming algorithm, inspired by the gene-

matching algorithms used in biology, which computes a log signature mismatch matrix between a pair of

wells and then finds the best correlation path thanks to an optimal path search through that matrix.

No commercial plans are yet made for this software. However, tests on multiple datasets from North

America demonstrate high-fidelity well-to-well correlations on wells separated by several hundred meters,

suggesting making our research prototype software is a very promising geological characterization tool.

New Software For Well-To-Well Correlation Of Spectroscopy Logs

Piotr W. Mirowski

Formerly Schlumberger-Doll Research

Now Ph.D candidate,

Courant Institute, New York University, NY

[email protected]

Michael Herron

Schlumberger-Doll Research, Ridgefield, CT

[email protected]

Samuel D. Fluckiger,

Schlumberger, Doha, Qatar

[email protected]

David S. McCormick

Schlumberger-Doll Research, Cambridge, MA

[email protected]

Traditional Methods forTraditional Methods forTraditional Methods forTraditional Methods for

WellWellWellWell----totototo----Well CorrelationWell CorrelationWell CorrelationWell Correlation

Traditional Methods forTraditional Methods forTraditional Methods forTraditional Methods for

WellWellWellWell----totototo----Well CorrelationWell CorrelationWell CorrelationWell Correlation

Spectroscopy logsSpectroscopy logsSpectroscopy logsSpectroscopy logsSpectroscopy logsSpectroscopy logsSpectroscopy logsSpectroscopy logs

Elemental concentration logs were obtained from the

Elemental Capture Spectroscopy (ECS*) sonde.

The ECS* sonde uses a standard 16-Ci [59.2 ¥ 1010-Bq]

americium beryllium (AmBe) neutron source and a

large bismuth germanate (BGO) detector to measure

relative elemental yields based on neutron-induced

capture gamma ray spectroscopy. The primary

elements measured in both open and cased holes are

for the formation elements silicon (Si), iron (Fe), calcium

(Ca), sulfur (S), titanium (Ti), and gadolinium (Gd),

chlorine (Cl), barium (Ba), and hydrogen (H).

Wellsite processing uses the 254-channel gamma ray

energy spectrum to produce dry-weight elements,

lithology, and matrix properties. The first step involves

spectral deconvolution of the composite gamma ray

energy spectrum by using a set of elemental standards

to produce relative elemental yields. The relative yields

are then converted to dry-weight elemental

concentration logs for the elements Si, Fe, Ca, S, Ti, and

Gd using an oxides closure method. Matrix properties

and quantitative dry-weight lithologies are then

calculated from the dry-weight elemental fractions

using empirical relationships derived from an extensive

core chemistry and mineralogy database, and a real-

time petrophysical analysis program.

* Mark of Schlumberger

Well-to-well correlation is an inexact

art form. Correlations typically use

only total gamma ray and resistivity.

While lines are drawn connecting

wells, the reasoning process for

selecting the correlation points is

usually unexplained. In the best

case, the shapes of the curves are

used for matching, but the absolute

values are commonly not consi-

dered.

This figure shows an example of

intrareservoir correlation based on

electric logs and part of a complex

study with a biostratigraphic

approach in Venezuela (Rull, 1994).

AuthorsAuthorsAuthorsAuthorsAuthorsAuthorsAuthorsAuthors

Manual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logsManual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logsManual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logsManual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logsManual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logsManual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logsManual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logsManual correlation on gamma ray and resistivity logs

IntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroduction

Nikita Seleznev

Schlumberger-Doll Research, Ridgefield, CT

[email protected]

Automated wellAutomated wellAutomated wellAutomated well----totototo----well correlation on gamma ray logswell correlation on gamma ray logswell correlation on gamma ray logswell correlation on gamma ray logsAutomated wellAutomated wellAutomated wellAutomated well----totototo----well correlation on gamma ray logswell correlation on gamma ray logswell correlation on gamma ray logswell correlation on gamma ray logs

However, this algorithm

has not been used with

spectroscopy logs such

as the dry weight

percentage channel logs

of Si, Ca, Fe, S, Ti, Gd or

Al elements.

The figure on the right

illustrates the interface of

our prototype software

for applied to well-to-well

correlation of standard

gamma ray logs. As we

will see in our poster,

these results can be

significantly improved.

The algorithm presented here has already been applied for the well-to-well correlation of Gamma Ray,

Neutron Porosity, Density, Spontaneous Potential, Spherically Focused Laterolog and Induction Log

Medium logs (Le Nir et al., 1998, illustrated on the figure above).

NPLC

Detector

Acquisition

Cartridge

Electronics

Heat Sink

Dewar Flask

AmBe Source

BGO Crystal

And PMT

Boron Sleeve

Spectroscopy sonde

Page 2: AAPG_2005_NewSoftwareForWell2WellCorrelation

New Software for Well-to-Well Correlation

of Spectroscopy Logs

New Software for Well-to-Well Correlation

of Spectroscopy LogsPiotr Mirowski, Michael Herron, Nikita Seleznev, Samuel Fluckiger, David McCormickPiotr Mirowski, Michael Herron, Nikita Seleznev, Samuel Fluckiger, David McCormick

Mismatch matrixMismatch matrixMismatch matrixMismatch matrixMismatch matrixMismatch matrixMismatch matrixMismatch matrix

Optimal Path Search AlgorithmOptimal Path Search AlgorithmOptimal Path Search AlgorithmOptimal Path Search AlgorithmOptimal Path Search AlgorithmOptimal Path Search AlgorithmOptimal Path Search AlgorithmOptimal Path Search Algorithm

Test software prototype implementedTest software prototype implementedTest software prototype implementedTest software prototype implementedTest software prototype implementedTest software prototype implementedTest software prototype implementedTest software prototype implemented

[ ]

[ ]

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( ){ }

( )

1

2

3

1 2 3

1 2 31,2,3

1,

1, 12,

, 12,

, min , ,

, argmin , ,

ij

c cost i j

c cost i ji M

c cost i jj N

cost i j c c c WM

dir i j c c c

= −

= − −

∀ ∈ = −

∀ ∈ = +

=

( )

( )

[ ]( ) ( )

( )

[ ]( ) ( )

( )

11

1

1

1,1

1,1 2

,1 1,12,

,1 1

1, 1, 12,

1, 3

i

j

cost WM

dir

cost i cost i WMi M

dir i

cost j cost j WMj N

dir j

=

=

= − +∀ ∈

=

= − +∀ ∈

=

The Dynamic Programming algorithm is an optimal

path search through the weighted mismatch matrix.

It relies on a cumulative cost matrix cost that is, for

a given pair (i, j), the cumulative sum of mismatches

on a path going from (1, 1) to (i, j), and on a

“direction” matrix dir.

The mismatch matrixmismatch matrixmismatch matrixmismatch matrix is a two-dimensional

representation of the difference between chemical

signatures (i.e. log values) measured in two

different wells. For each possible pair of depth

values, it shows where the chemical signatures in

both wells are similar (low value) or dissimilar (high

value). The optimal path appears as a “valley” of

low values (of mismatch) through the pairwise map.

)()( 21 jiij dldlM −=

The weighted mismatch matrixweighted mismatch matrixweighted mismatch matrixweighted mismatch matrix is a linear

combination of mismatch matrices for the different

available log channels, each log cannel given a

weight between 0 and 1 that is proportional to its

user-assigned relative importance.1, 2,( ) ( )ij k k i k j

k

WM w l d l d= −∑

To automate the process of determining correlations between pairs of wells, we employ the technique of

dynamic programming (Lineman et al., 1987; Doveton, 1994; Le Nir et al., 1998), inspired by the gene-matching

algorithms used in biology. This technique consists of computing a mismatch matrix between log values in a

pair of wells and then finding the best connection path through that matrix using an optimal path search.

WellWellWellWell----totototo----well correlation algorithmwell correlation algorithmwell correlation algorithmwell correlation algorithmWellWellWellWell----totototo----well correlation algorithmwell correlation algorithmwell correlation algorithmwell correlation algorithm

Well A

Well B

2170

1540

1880

1680

1710 1840 2160

Well B

Well A

In this example we show the mismatch matrix computed on Si dry weight channels from two wells A and B.

Columns of the matrix correspond to depths indexes of well B, and rows to those of well A. Dark values

correspond to a high “mismatch” or “distance” between the log values, whereas light values correspond to

a good “match”. On the 3D rendering of the region bounded by the green rectangle, mismatches appear as

plateaus and good correlations as valleys. The optimal path is highlighted with dots.

The mismatchmismatchmismatchmismatch can be defined as a “distance”

between log values. For a single log channel, we

compute a rectangular mismatch matrix, Mij, using

differences between absolute log values l1(di) in

well 1 at depth index i, and l2(dj) in well 2 at depth

index j. Low and high values of Mij respectively

correspond to strong and weak connections for a

particular couple of samples.

To start the process it is necessary to assign initial

column and row values of the matrix: cost(1, 1),

cost(1, j) and cost(i, 1), as well as the directions

dir(1, 1), dir(1, j) and dir(i, 1).

Log curve filteringLog curve filteringLog curve filteringLog curve filteringLog curve filteringLog curve filteringLog curve filteringLog curve filtering

Weighted mismatch matrixWeighted mismatch matrixWeighted mismatch matrixWeighted mismatch matrixWeighted mismatch matrixWeighted mismatch matrixWeighted mismatch matrixWeighted mismatch matrix

This weighted mismatch matrix defines a multi-log

metric of well-to-well connection and hence

enables a multi-dimensional search of optimal path

in the well-to-well log distance space.

++++++++ ++++++++ ========0.5x0.5x0.5x0.5x 0.5x0.5x0.5x0.5x1x1x1x1x

Illustration of the concept of weighted mismatch matrix, where the mismatch matrices for Silicon and

Aluminum dry weight channel logs have weights of 0.5, and the mismatch matrix for Calcium has a weight 1.

AluminumAluminumAluminumAluminumCalciumCalciumCalciumCalciumSiliconSiliconSiliconSilicon

We developed a program with a user-friendly

interface. The program allows us to import well log

data (including spectroscopy dry weight percentage

channels), to specify for each well start and end

markers for the well-to-well correlation interval,

select and assign user-specified weights to log

channels according to their interpreted geological

importance, apply filters to log curves, visualize

mismatch matrices and well-to-well correlation

results, and export the results as text files.

Running on Windows platform, it took a few

seconds for our software to compute well-to-well

correlations in a dataset of 2,500 feet of multi-

channel logs sampled at 0.5 foot intervals. Such a

good performance makes this technique a

promising tool for geoscientists.

To facilitate the connection of wells on their log

values, it can be useful to smooth the log values so

as to soften the apparently “noisy” aspect of logs

and provide a better continuity on adjacent depth

samples.

The filters we have used in our study include the

Mathematical Morphology filter (Serra, 1986, see

the figure on the right), median filter, and the

Gaussian filter. We tend to prefer edge-preserving

filters such as the latter, because they do not

“smear out” spikes and important changes in log

curves that can correspond to geological events.

These filters are local, i.e., for a given depth, the

new value of the log curve is computed as a

function of the log values of a small set of depth

samples above and below.

WeightedWeightedWeightedWeighted

MismatchMismatchMismatchMismatch

MatrixMatrixMatrixMatrix

Optimal pathOptimal path

Unfiltered Filtered

Well-to-well

correlation displayWell log displaysSpectroscopy

log channel selection

Spectroscopy

log channel selection

Mismatch matrix display

A perfect well-to-

well correlation

corresponds to a

straight optimal

path on the

mismatch matrix,

joining the Top

and Bottom

markers. The

correlation strata

are then parallel.

GoodGoodGoodGoodGoodGoodGoodGood MediocreMediocreMediocreMediocreMediocreMediocreMediocreMediocre

BadBadBadBadBadBadBadBad

BadBadBadBadBadBadBadBad

Page 3: AAPG_2005_NewSoftwareForWell2WellCorrelation

Doveton, J.H., “Lateral Correlation and Interpolation of Logs”,

Geologic Log Analysis Using Computer Methods, AAPG

Computer Applications in Geology No. 2, 1994, AAPG, Tulsa,

pp.127-150.

LeNir I., Van Gysel N., Rossi D., “Cross-Section Construction

From Automated Well Log Correlation: A Dynamic Programming

Approach Using Multiple Well Logs”, SPWLA 39th Annual

Logging Symposium, May 26-29, 1998.

Lineman D.J., Mendelson J.D., Toksos M.N., “Well To Well Log

Correlation Using Knowledge-Based Systems and Dynamic

Depth Warping”, SPWLA 28th Annual Logging Symposium, June

29-July 2, 1987.

Rull, V. “High-Impact Palynology in Petroleum

Geology: Applications from Venezuela (Northern South

America)”, AAPG Bulletin, v. 86, no. 2, February 2002, pp.279-300.

Herron S., Herron M., “Application of Nuclear Spectroscopy

Logs to the Derivation of Formation Matrix Density”, SPWLA 41st

Annual Logging Symposium, June 4-7, 2000.

Serra J., "Introduction to mathematical morphology", Computer

Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, Volume 35 , Issue 3,

September 1986, pp.283-305.

We would like to thank Rick Kear, Philippe Marza

and Romain Prioul for useful suggestions on the

software usability. Mohamed Aly, Jim Bristow,

Alexis Carrillat, Selim Djandji, Roy Dove, Tamir El-

Halawani, Ahmed Elsherif, Sherif Farag, Melissa

Johansson, Lucian Johnston, Rick Lewis, Richard

Netherwood, John Philips, Raghu Ramamoorthy,

Frank Shray, Nneka Williams, Michael Wilson,

Rachel Wood, and Meretta Qleibo helped test the

software.

ConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsReferencesReferencesReferencesReferencesReferencesReferencesReferencesReferences

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

… vs. Multi… vs. Multi… vs. Multi… vs. Multi----log correlationlog correlationlog correlationlog correlation… vs. Multi… vs. Multi… vs. Multi… vs. Multi----log correlationlog correlationlog correlationlog correlation

0.5 x Silicon0.5 x Silicon0.5 x Silicon0.5 x Silicon 1 x Calcium1 x Calcium1 x Calcium1 x Calcium++++ ++++ 0.5 x Aluminum0.5 x Aluminum0.5 x Aluminum0.5 x Aluminum

SingleSingleSingleSingle----log correlation…log correlation…log correlation…log correlation…SingleSingleSingleSingle----log correlation…log correlation…log correlation…log correlation…

Poor correlation results between two siliclastic wells A and B from a dataset from North America

containing shale, sandstone and thin marine limestone horizons. One single mismatch matrix, derived

from one single log, was used at a time. Equally poor results were obtained with Gamma Ray logs only.

SiliconSiliconSiliconSilicon CalciumCalciumCalciumCalcium IronIronIronIron SulfurSulfurSulfurSulfur

TitaniumTitaniumTitaniumTitanium GadoliniumGadoliniumGadoliniumGadolinium AluminumAluminumAluminumAluminum Gamma RayGamma RayGamma RayGamma Ray

Spectroscopy logs carrySpectroscopy logs carrySpectroscopy logs carrySpectroscopy logs carry

complementary informationcomplementary informationcomplementary informationcomplementary information

Spectroscopy logs carrySpectroscopy logs carrySpectroscopy logs carrySpectroscopy logs carry

complementary informationcomplementary informationcomplementary informationcomplementary informationMultiMultiMultiMulti----log multilog multilog multilog multi----well correlationwell correlationwell correlationwell correlationMultiMultiMultiMulti----log multilog multilog multilog multi----well correlationwell correlationwell correlationwell correlation

SiliconSiliconSiliconSilicon SulfurSulfurSulfurSulfurSulfurSulfurSulfurSulfur

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

ns

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

ns

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

ns

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

ns

of

Sil

ico

n l

og

so

f S

ilic

on

lo

gs

of

Sil

ico

n l

og

so

f S

ilic

on

lo

gs

Correlation results between siliclastic wells A and B obtained for a weighted set of Silicon, Calcium

and Aluminum dry weight channel logs. Si and Al logs were given a weight of 0.5, whereas Ca logs

were given a weight 1. Unlike the single-channel correlation, the multi-log correlation reveals a very

similar sequence stratigraphy in both wells, yet horizontally distant by a distance of a few hundred

meters.

Silicon (in green) and Sulfur (in red)

dry weight percentages channel logs

vehicle complementary information for

the correlation of these two wells from

a dataset from North America.

These are carbonate/evaporite

sequences and the silicon represents

sand, mainly quartz, and some clay. In

this environment, the sulfur is due to

anhydrite, and many anhydrite beds

are chronostratigraphic as well as

lithostratigraphic surfaces.

Perfect correlation between wells 1 and 2…Perfect correlation between wells 1 and 2…Perfect correlation between wells 1 and 2…Perfect correlation between wells 1 and 2…Perfect correlation between wells 1 and 2…Perfect correlation between wells 1 and 2…Perfect correlation between wells 1 and 2…Perfect correlation between wells 1 and 2…

… very good correlation between wells 3 and 4…… very good correlation between wells 3 and 4…… very good correlation between wells 3 and 4…… very good correlation between wells 3 and 4…… very good correlation between wells 3 and 4…… very good correlation between wells 3 and 4…… very good correlation between wells 3 and 4…… very good correlation between wells 3 and 4…

… appearance of a sand bed between wells 1 and 3… appearance of a sand bed between wells 1 and 3… appearance of a sand bed between wells 1 and 3… appearance of a sand bed between wells 1 and 3… appearance of a sand bed between wells 1 and 3… appearance of a sand bed between wells 1 and 3… appearance of a sand bed between wells 1 and 3… appearance of a sand bed between wells 1 and 3

SiliconSiliconSiliconSilicon SulfurSulfurSulfurSulfur

SiliconSiliconSiliconSilicon SulfurSulfurSulfurSulfur

SiliconSiliconSiliconSilicon SulfurSulfurSulfurSulfur

Well_1 and Well_3 have a

different sequence strati-

graphy. There is a missing

sand bed in well 1. It has to

be noted that the sand bed

appears only on the Silicon

dry weight channel logs.

The correlation strata

above the sand bed are

leveled out by the Top

correlation marker. The

optimal path search is

indeed done only between

Top and Bottom markers.

Two wells, Well_1 and

Well_2, from a dataset

from carbonate/evaporate

dataset in North America,

showing a very good

correlation of sequence

stratigraphy despite being

distant of 100 meters. We

filtered the logs before

well-to-well correlation in

order to provide with a

better continuity on

adjacent depth samples of

log curves.

No commercial plans are yet made for this

software. However, tests on multi-channel

geochemical log datasets from North America

demonstrate precise, consistent well-to-well

correlations on wells separated by several

hundred meters, suggesting that this prototype

software using multiple geochemical logs is a

very promising geological characterization and

interpretation tool.

There is a similarly good

correlation between

Well_3 and Well_4, from

the same carbonate/

evaporate dataset from

North America. A sand bed

that did not exist in wells 1

and 2 appears at an

approximate depth 4800ft,

and is visible on the Silicon

dry weight percentage

channel logs.

Sand bedSand bedSand bedSand bed

Geological eventGeological eventGeological eventGeological eventGeological eventGeological eventGeological eventGeological event

ParallelParallelParallelParallel

correlation stratacorrelation stratacorrelation stratacorrelation strata

Optimal pathOptimal pathOptimal pathOptimal path

====

straight line throughstraight line throughstraight line throughstraight line through

mismatch matrixmismatch matrixmismatch matrixmismatch matrix

Co

ntrib

utio

ns

Co

ntrib

utio

ns

Co

ntrib

utio

ns

Co

ntrib

utio

ns

of S

ulfu

r log

so

f Su

lfur lo

gs

of S

ulfu

r log

so

f Su

lfur lo

gs

Co

ntrib

utio

ns

Co

ntrib

utio

ns

Co

ntrib

utio

ns

Co

ntrib

utio

ns

of S

ulfu

r log

so

f Su

lfur lo

gs

of S

ulfu

r log

so

f Su

lfur lo

gs

Perfect wellPerfect wellPerfect wellPerfect well----totototo----wellwellwellwell

correlationcorrelationcorrelationcorrelation

when using awhen using awhen using awhen using a

weighted mismatchweighted mismatchweighted mismatchweighted mismatch

matrixmatrixmatrixmatrix

IsolatedIsolatedIsolatedIsolated

eventseventseventsevents

GoodGoodGoodGood

overalloveralloveralloverall

correlationcorrelationcorrelationcorrelation

with Cawith Cawith Cawith Ca

GoodGoodGoodGood

overalloveralloveralloverall

correlationcorrelationcorrelationcorrelation

with Cawith Cawith Cawith Ca

Very goodVery goodVery goodVery good

correlationcorrelationcorrelationcorrelation

pointspointspointspoints

on on on on SiSiSiSi and Caand Caand Caand Ca

Fe and SFe and SFe and SFe and S

bad correlationbad correlationbad correlationbad correlation

channelschannelschannelschannels

IsolatedIsolatedIsolatedIsolated

eventeventeventevent

on on on on SiSiSiSi

UnconformityUnconformityUnconformityUnconformity

minimizedminimizedminimizedminimized

on Alon Alon Alon Al

IsolatedIsolatedIsolatedIsolated

eventseventseventsevents

Ti and Ti and Ti and Ti and GdGdGdGd

are traceare traceare traceare trace

elementselementselementselements

in wellsin wellsin wellsin wells

A and BA and BA and BA and B

Very goodVery goodVery goodVery good

correlation correlation correlation correlation

points on Alpoints on Alpoints on Alpoints on AlIntervalsIntervalsIntervalsIntervals

betweenbetweenbetweenbetween

markersmarkersmarkersmarkers

areareareare

heteroheteroheterohetero----

geneousgeneousgeneousgeneous

UnconformityUnconformityUnconformityUnconformity

minimizedminimizedminimizedminimized

on on on on SiSiSiSi

ParallelParallelParallelParallel

markermarkermarkermarker

bedsbedsbedsbeds