a simple data analysis process for dissertations
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Business Value of
Agile MethodsUsing ROI & Real Options
Dr. David F. Rico, PMP, CSM
Website: http://davidfrico.comBiography: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidfrico
![Page 2: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
AgendaIntroduction to Agile MethodsTypes of Agile MethodsPractices of Agile MethodsBenefits of Agile MethodsCosts of Traditional MethodsCosts of Agile MethodsValue of Agile MethodsComparison of Agile MethodsSummary of Business Value
![Page 3: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
AuthorDoD contractor with 25+ years of IT experienceB.S. Comp. Sci., M.S. Soft. Eng., D.M. Info. Tech.Large NASA & DoD programs (U.S., Japan, Europe)
* Published five textbooks and over 15 articles on various topics in return on investment, information technology, agile methods, etc.
![Page 4: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
PurposeProvide an overview of the business value of Agile Methods using return on investment:
Business value is an approach for estimating the tangible and intangible worth of organizational assetsBusiness value is an appraisal of intellectual assets such as knowledge, experience, and skillsBusiness value is a technique for determining the complete worth of an investment to an enterpriseBusiness value is a method of determining the health and well-being of a firm in the long-runBusiness value includes employee, customer, supplier, alliance, management, and societal value
![Page 5: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
What is Agility?A-gil-i-ty (ə-'ji-lə-tē) Quickness, lightness, and ease of movement; nimbleness
Agility is the ability to create and respond to changein order to profit in a turbulent business environmentAgility is reprioritizing for maneuverability because of shifting requirements, technology, and knowledgeAgility is a very fast response to changes in customer requirements through intensive customer interactionAgility is the use of adaptability and evolutionary delivery to promote rapid customer responsivenessAgility is a better way of developing products using collaboration, teamwork, iterations, and flexibility
![Page 6: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
What are Agile Methods?‘Adaptable’ software development methodologies‘Human-centric’ method for creating business value‘Alternative’ to large document-based methodologies
Agile Manifesto. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development. Retrieved September 3, 2008, from http://www.agilemanifesto.org
![Page 7: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Essence of Agile MethodsHigh degree of customer & developer interactionHighly-skilled teams producing frequent iterationsRight-sized, just-enough, and just-in-time process
Highsmith, J. A. (2002). Agile software development ecosystems. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
![Page 8: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Why use Agile Methods?Adaptability to changing market/customer needsBetter cost efficiencies and fastest time-to-marketImproved quality, satisfaction, and project success
Agile Manifesto. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development. Retrieved September 3, 2008, from http://www.agilemanifesto.org
![Page 9: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
AgendaIntroduction to Agile Methods
Types of Agile MethodsPractices of Agile MethodsBenefits of Agile MethodsCosts of Traditional MethodsCosts of Agile MethodsValue of Agile MethodsComparison of Agile MethodsSummary of Business Value
![Page 10: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Crystal MethodsCreated by Alistair Cockburn in 1991Has 14 practices, 10 roles, and 25 productsScalable family of techniques for critical systems
Cockburn, A. (2002). Agile software development. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
![Page 11: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
ScrumCreated by Jeff Sutherland at Easel in 1993Has 5 practices, 3 roles, 5 products, rules, etc.Uses EVM to burn down backlog in 30-day iterations
Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2001). Agile software development with scrum. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
![Page 12: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Dynamic Systems Develop.Created by group of British firms in 199315 practices, 12 roles, and 23 work productsNon-proprietary RAD approach from early 1990s
Stapleton, J. (1997). DSDM: A framework for business centered development. Harlow, England: Addison-Wesley.
![Page 13: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Feature Driven DevelopmentCreated by Jeff De Luca at Nebulon in 1997Has 8 practices, 14 roles, and 16 work productsUses object-oriented design and code inspections
Palmer, S. R., & Felsing, J. M. (2002). A practical guide to feature driven development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
![Page 14: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Extreme ProgrammingCreated by Kent Beck at Chrysler in 1998Has 28 practices, 7 roles, and 7 work productsPopularized pair programming and test-driven dev.
Beck, K. (2000). Extreme programming explained: Embrace change. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
![Page 15: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
AgendaIntroduction to Agile MethodsTypes of Agile Methods
Practices of Agile MethodsBenefits of Agile MethodsCosts of Traditional MethodsCosts of Agile MethodsValue of Agile MethodsComparison of Agile MethodsSummary of Business Value
![Page 16: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Extreme Programming (cont’d)RELEASE PLANNING — Best Practice
Created by Kent Beck at Chrysler in 1998Lightweight project management frameworkUsed for managing both XP and Scrum projects
Beck, K., & Fowler, M. (2004). Planning extreme programming. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.
![Page 17: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
PAIR PROGRAMMING — Best PracticeTerm coined by Jim Coplien in 1995Consists of two side-by-side programmersHighly-effective group problem-solving technique
Williams, L., & Kessler, R. (2002). Pair programming illuminated. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Extreme Programming (cont’d)
![Page 18: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
REFACTORING — Best PracticeTerm coined by William Opdyke in 1990Process of frequently rewriting source codeImproves readability, maintainability, and quality
Extreme Programming (cont’d)
Fowler, M. (1999). Refactoring: Improving the design of existing code. Boston, MA. Addison-Wesley.
![Page 19: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
TEST-DRIVEN DEV. — Best PracticeTerm coined by Kent Beck in 2003Consists of writing all tests before codingEnsures all source code is verified and validated
Beck, K. (2003). Test-driven development: By example. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Extreme Programming (cont’d)
![Page 20: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Extreme Programming (cont’d)CONT. INTEGRATION — Best Practice
Term coined by Martin Fowler in 1998Process of automated build/regression testingEvaluates impact of all changes against entire system
Duvall, P., Matyas, S., & Glover, A. (2006). Continuous integration: Improving software quality and reducing risk. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley
![Page 21: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
AgendaIntroduction to Agile MethodsTypes of Agile MethodsPractices of Agile Methods
Benefits of Agile MethodsCosts of Traditional MethodsCosts of Agile MethodsValue of Agile MethodsComparison of Agile MethodsSummary of Business Value
![Page 22: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Surveys of Agile MethodsNumerous surveys of Agile Methods since 2003AmbySoft and Version One collect annual dataGenerally include both hard and soft benefits
Rico, D. F. (2008). What is the return-on-investment of agile methods? Retrieved February 3, 2009, from http://davidfrico.com/rico08a.pdf
![Page 23: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Agile (138 pt.) and traditional methods (99 pt.)Agile methods fare better in all benefits categoriesAgile methods 359% better than traditional methods
Rico, D. F. (2008). What is the ROI of agile vs. traditional methods? TickIT International, 10(4), 9-18.
Studies of Agile Methods
![Page 24: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Analysis of 29 agile projects involving 839 peopleAgile projects are 550% better than traditional onesXP (753%) and Scrum (148%) better than traditional
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
Analysis of Agile Methods
![Page 25: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Analysis of 23 agile vs. 7,500 traditional projectsAgile projects are 41% better than traditional onesXP (56%) and Scrum (26%) better than trad. projects
Mah, M. (2008). Measuring agile in the enterprise: Proceedings of the Agile 2008 Conference, Toronto, Canada.
Projects Using Agile Methods
![Page 26: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Analysis of 29 agile vs. 7,500 traditional projectsAgile projects are 33% better than traditional onesRally projects are 28% better than traditional ones
Rally Software. (2009). The agile impact report. Boulder, CO: Author.
Projects Using Agile Tools
![Page 27: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
AgendaIntroduction to Agile MethodsTypes of Agile MethodsPractices of Agile MethodsBenefits of Agile Methods
Costs of Traditional MethodsCosts of Agile MethodsValue of Agile MethodsComparison of Agile MethodsSummary of Business Value
![Page 28: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Software Lifecycle Costs1:10:100 ratio forms a basic model to estimate ROIDefects have negative multiplicative effect on costAgile methods leave fewer defects (higher ROI)
Boehm, B. W. (1981). Software engineering economics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
![Page 29: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Software Cost ModelsCost estimation models still in use todayUsed to estimate effort of Traditional MethodsAdjusted average of 5,088 used for ROI estimation
Benediktsson, O., & Dalcher, D. (2005). Estimating size in incremental software development projects. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 152(6), 253-259.
![Page 30: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Total Lifecycle Costs0.51 hours/line of code for Traditional Methods10% defect inject rate (1,000 defects/10 KLOC)67% of defects in test (33% in maintenance)
Rico, D. F. (2004). ROI of software process improvement: Metrics for project managers and software engineers. Boca Raton, FL: J. Ross Publishing.In, H. P., et al. (2006). A quality-based cost estimation model for the product line life cycle. Communications of the ACM, 49(12), 85-88.McCann, B. (2007). The relative cost of interchanging, adding, or dropping quality practices. Crosstalk, 20(6), 25-28.
![Page 31: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
AgendaIntroduction to Agile MethodsTypes of Agile MethodsPractices of Agile MethodsBenefits of Agile MethodsCosts of Traditional Methods
Costs of Agile MethodsValue of Agile MethodsComparison of Agile MethodsSummary of Business Value
![Page 32: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Agile Cost ModelsBased on 13 studies of Extreme Programming (XP)Also based on 7 studies of pair programming (PP)“Pair programming” had highest productivity
Rico, D. F. (2008). What is the ROI of agile vs. traditional methods? TickIT International, 10(4), 9-18.
![Page 33: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Agile Quality ModelsBased on 10 studies of Extreme Programming (XP)Also based on 6 studies of pair programming (PP)“Extreme Programming” had the highest quality
Rico, D. F. (2008). What is the ROI of agile vs. traditional methods? TickIT International, 10(4), 9-18.
![Page 34: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Agile Lifecycle Cost ModelsCosts based on productivity and quality modelsDevelopment costs based on LOC ÷ productivity rateMaintenance costs based on defects × KLOC × MH
Rico, D. F. (2008). What is the ROI of agile vs. traditional methods? TickIT International, 10(4), 9-18.
![Page 35: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Agile Lifecycle Benefit ModelsBenefits based on total traditional less agile costsTraditional costs based LOC × dev. + maint. effortTraditional costs credited testing effort applied
Rico, D. F. (2008). What is the ROI of agile vs. traditional methods? TickIT International, 10(4), 9-18.
![Page 36: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
AgendaIntroduction to Agile MethodsTypes of Agile MethodsPractices of Agile MethodsBenefits of Agile MethodsCosts of Traditional MethodsCosts of Agile Methods
Value of Agile MethodsComparison of Agile MethodsSummary of Business Value
![Page 37: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Measures of Business ValueA major principle of Agile Methods is creating valueROI is the measure of value within Agile MethodsThere are seven closely related ROI measures
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 38: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Extreme ProgrammingCosts based on avg. productivity and qualityProductivity ranged from 3.5 to 43 LOC an hourCosts were $136,548, benefits were $4,373,449
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 39: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Test Driven DevelopmentCosts based on avg. productivity and qualityProductivity ranged from 12 to 36 LOC an hourCosts were $249,653, benefits were $4,260,344
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 40: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Pair ProgrammingCosts based on avg. productivity and qualityProductivity ranged from 16 to 87 LOC an hourCosts were $265,437, benefits were $4,244,560
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 41: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
ScrumCosts based on avg. productivity and qualityProductivity ranged from 4.7 to 5.9 LOC an hourCosts were $578,202, benefits were $3,931,795
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 42: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Agile MethodsCosts based on avg. productivity and qualityProductivity ranged from 3.6 to 87 LOC an hourCosts were $226,805, benefits were $4,283,192
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 43: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
AgendaIntroduction to Agile MethodsTypes of Agile MethodsPractices of Agile MethodsBenefits of Agile MethodsCosts of Traditional MethodsCosts of Agile MethodsValue of Agile Methods
Comparison of Agile MethodsSummary of Business Value
![Page 44: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Productivity of Agile MethodsPP productivity 32X more than trad. methodsScrum productivity 5X more than trad. methodsAgile methods productivity 20X more than traditional
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 45: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Quality of Agile MethodsXP quality 13X better than trad. methodsScrum quality 3X better than trad. methodsAgile methods quality 5X better than traditional
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 46: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Costs of Agile MethodsXP costs 8X less than traditional methodsScrum costs 2X less than traditional methodsAgile methods cost 5X less than traditional methods
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 47: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Benefits of Agile MethodsXP benefits 1.5X more than traditional methodsScrum benefits 1.3X more than traditional methodsAgile methods benefits 1.4X more than trad. methods
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 48: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
ROI of Agile MethodsXP ROI 18X more than traditional methodsScrum ROI 3.4X more than traditional methodsAgile methods ROI 10X more than trad. methods
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 49: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
NPV of Agile MethodsXP NPV 2.4X more than traditional methodsScrum NPV 1.9X more than traditional methodsAgile methods NPV 2.3X more than trad. methods
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 50: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
Real Options of Agile MethodsXP ROA 1.6X more than traditional methodsScrum ROA 1.4X more than traditional methodsAgile methods ROA 1.6X more than trad. methods
Rico, D. F., Sayani, H. H., & Sone, S. (2009). The business value of agile software methods. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
![Page 51: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
AgendaIntroduction to Agile MethodsTypes of Agile MethodsPractices of Agile MethodsBenefits of Agile MethodsCosts of Traditional MethodsCosts of Agile MethodsValue of Agile MethodsComparison of Agile Methods
Summary of Business Value
![Page 52: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
Cost of QualityApply traditional reliability and quality theoryDefects are inexpensive to remove early in cycleLate bug removal has negative, multiplicative effect
Rico, D. F. (2000). Using cost benefit analyses to develop software process improvement (SPI) strategies. Rome, NY: DACS.
![Page 53: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
Real OptionsNPV models losses of Traditional MethodsReal options model profits from Agile MethodsAgile Methods incur less initial risk and higher ROI
Fichman, R. G., Keil, M., & Tiwana, A. (2005). Beyond valuation: Options thinking in IT project management. California Management Review, 47(2), 74-96.
![Page 54: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
Issues with Agile MethodsAgile methods are small (but not simple)Agile methods more about values than practicesAgile methods focus a lot on computer programming
![Page 55: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
Trends in Agile MethodsAgile methods are related to Lean ThinkingAgile methods scale up to large projects/systemsAgile methods now used in large US gov’t programs
![Page 56: A Simple Data Analysis Process for Dissertations](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022021919/620fd2705002a872ed7c11d7/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
New Book on Agile MethodsGuide to Agile Methods for business leadersCommunicates business value of Agile MethodsRosetta stone to Agile Methods for Traditional folks
http://davidfrico.com/rico09b.pdf (ROI tutorial)http://davidfrico.com/rico09e.pdf (ROI survey)http://davidfrico.com/rico09g.xls (ROI database)