a memetic algorithm for water distribution network design · the memetic algorithm here proposed...
TRANSCRIPT
1
A Memetic Algorithm for WaterDistribution Network Design
R. Baños* , C. Gil*, J. I. Agulleiro*, J. Reca†
* Dpt. Computer Architecture and Electronics, University of Almería (Spain)† Dpt. Rural Engineering, University of Almería (Spain)
11th Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications – September-October , 2006
2
Summary
Water distribution network design (WDND)Description of the problemFormulation
A new memetic algorithm for WDND
MENOME (MEta-Heuristic pipe Network Optimization ModEl)Flow diagramInterface
Experimental analysisTest networksParameter settingsResults at Alperovits and Shamir’s networkResults at Hanoi network
Conclusions and future work
3
Water distribution network design (WDND)
Goal: find the best way in term of investment cost ofconveying water from the sources to the users, satisfyingtheir requirements.
Variables imposed in the model:Network connectivity, Capacity of the tanks,Power of the pumps,Pressure required.
Decision variables:Pipe diameters.
Description of the problem
4
Water distribution network design (WDND)
WDND: minimize fitness function “F”
where: F is the cost function,m is the number of pipe diameters,ci is the cost of the pipe with diameter i per unit of length,Li is the total length of pipe with diameter i in the network,cp is a penalty coefficient, hrj is the required presure head in the node j,hj is the current presure head computed by EPANET for node j.
Formulation
5
Linear programming techniques,Non-linear programming techniques,Heuristic methods:
Genetic Algorithms, Simulated Annealing, Tabu Search, Ant Colony Optimiation,Scatter Search, …………
A new memetic algorithm for WDNDTechniques for solving WDND
6
Get input parameters
Obtain children from parents (Reproduction process)
YESYES
NONO
Stop condition?
Return best solution found in the search
Is there convergence?YESYES
Initialize population of agents (P)
Apply Local_Optimizer to P
Evaluate convergence of solutions using the Entropy of P
NONO
A new memetic algorithm for WDNDFlow diagram of the memetic algorithm for WDND
Update P using new children
Apply Local_Optimizer to the new children
Re-initialize population
7
Flow diagram
MENOME (MEta-Heuristic pipe Network Optimization ModEl)
Pipeline DatabaseNetwork Configuration
Reader module ofEPANET file formats
Database management module(ActiveX Data Object)
Network solverEPANET 2.00.07
Main program in Visual Basic (includes meta-heuristic optimizers)
DLLDLL
Graphicalinterface
8
MENOME (MEta-Heuristic pipe Network Optimization ModEl)
MENOME interface
9
Experimental Experimental analysisanalysisTest Networks: Alperovits and Shamir network
2 loops, 7 nodes, 8 pipes, 1 reservoir, 0 pumping stations,14 commercial diameters available 148 = 1,4758·109 possible configurations,
12
3
4
5
6
7
8
[1]
[2][3]
[4][5]
[6][7]
10
Experimental Experimental analysisanalysisTest Networks: Hanoi network
3 loops, 32 nodes, 34 pipes, 1 reservoir, 0 pumping stations,6 commercial diameters available 634= 2,8651·1026 possible configurations,
1
32
2
6
21
19
[24]
[31] [32]
18
10
12
3433 26 27 28 15 14 13
29
31
[29] [28] [23]
30 23
[21]
[22]
22
20
[20]
24
25
[25] [26] [27]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[3]
[2]
[1]
3 4
[4] [5]
5
[6]
[7]
7
[8]
8[9][10][14][15]16
17
[16] 9
[12][13]
[11]
11
[30]
11
Experimental Experimental analysisanalysisParameter settings
12
Experimental Experimental analysisanalysisResults in Alperovits and Shamir’s network
All the methods reach the minimum cost.On average of 10 runs: MA outperforms to the other methods (all the configurationsreach 419.000 monetary units). Difference among methods is, on average, lesser than 1.7%.
13
Experimental Experimental analysisanalysisResults in Alperovits and Shamir’s network
All the methods reach 419.000 monetary units, although SA converge faster
14
Experimental Experimental analysisanalysisResults in Hanoi network
MA obtains the best investment cost (6295909) while other methods are more expensive.On average of 10 runs: MA outperforms to the other methodsDifference among methods is, on average, lesser than 1.95%.
15
Experimental Experimental analysisanalysisResults in Hanoi network
MA obtains best results than other methods.Although the difference, in percentage, is small, in layout problems it becomes important.
16
ConclusionsNew memetic algorithm for Water Distribution Network Design (WDND).
Comparative study of memetic algorithms with other heuristic approaches.
The memetic algorithm here proposed works better than other heuristics.
When the problem instance grows, the memetic algorithm performs better.
Future workMulti-objective treatment of this problem considering reliability.
Extend the formulation to consider other designing aspects (connectivity, etc.)
Conclusions and future work
17
QUESTIONS?
COMMENTS?
11th Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications – September-October , 2006