a mechanistic model analysis of mercury in the …...a mechanistic model analysis of mercury in the...
TRANSCRIPT
A Mechanistic Model Analysis of Mercury in the Yolo
Bypass and the Sacramento/San Joaquin River Delta
Reed Harris, David Hutchinson, Matt Gove, Don Beals
Reed Harris Environmental Ltd.
Carol DiGiorgio, Nicky Prabhjot, Ali Abrishamchi, Jamie Anderson, En-Ching Hsu, Kevin He, Kijin Nam, David Bosworth, Hari
Rajbhandari, Ming-Yen Tu
California Department of Water Resources
Mark Stephenson, Wes Heim
Moss Landing Marine Laboratory
Gary Gill,
Pacific Northwest Laboratory
Randall Hunt, Paul Work, David Schoellhamer
US Geological Survey
September 26, 2019
1
• Assist California Department of Water Resources to meet requirements for the open water portion of Delta/Bypass methylmercury TMDL.
• Better understand factors controlling MeHg cycling and sources in particular.
• Investigate effects on MeHg of operational changes in water management and flood conveyance in the Yolo Bypass. Develop best management practices.
Mercury Modeling Objectives
2
Model Study Approach
1. Develop necessary modeling tools
2. Simulate existing conditions• One model for Yolo Bypass• One model for Delta• Manual calibration followed by parameter estimation
software (PEST)
3. Pass results from Bypass model to Delta model
4. Examine model sensitivity to different inputs(using parameter estimation software called PEST)
5. Simulate future scenarios
6. Examine uncertainty (using PEST) 3
Using two mechanistic models:
1 – An existing model of mercury cycling for Yolo Bypass (D-MCM)
2 – Added mercury to an existing DWR model of hydrodynamics and water quality (DSM2)
4
Features of Both Models
1. Mass balance, process-based
2. Time dependent
3. Simulate inorganic mercury and methylmercury
4. Include dissolved and particulate mercury forms in water column and surface sediments
5
Sediment transport
Hydrodynamics
Mercury in water and sediments
Major Components of Modeling Framework
Yolo Bypass Delta
TUFLOW
TUFLOW +experimental studies
D-MCM + experimental studies
DSM2
DSM2
Not includedMercury in vegetation
DSM2D-MCM
6
Group of cellsWetland Cell
One water compartment
Four sediment compartments
Yolo Bypass model: D-MCM
7
Potential Vegetation Effects on MeHg
1. Reduced light (affects photochemical reactions)
2. Increased atmospheric deposition
3. Increased flux of Hg(0) to atmosphere
4. Supply of organic matter and mercury
5. Mercury uptake via roots, changes in hydrology.
6. In-plant methylation?
9
DSM2
• Developed by California Department of Water Resources
• Previously simulated hydrodynamics (1D) and water quality.
• For this project:• Added mercury• Added sediment bed
10
• Correctly simulate whether areas are sources or sinks for total mercury and MeHg.
• Predict whether operational changes will cause MeHg supply to increase or decrease
• Yolo Bypass: Unlikely to capture day to day variability in such a dynamic system
• Using PEST software to help assess uncertainty and estimate confidence in model results.
Model uncertainty: What is realistic to expect?
11
Fremont Weir is the biggest estimated external source of MeHg overall….. ….but other sources are also important….importance depends on hydrology (e.g. Fremont Weir does not always flow)
14
* Fraction of inflowing load trapped ((inflow - outflow)/inflow)
No trapping
Export = 2X input
Nothing escapes…
Yolo Bypass estimated to be a source of MeHg, sink for solids and THg
Sou
rce
Sin
k
15
Yolo Bypass is a source of methylmercury in simulations….
Model Foe et al. (2008)
Water year 2006 comparison:
Outflows Outflows
Inflows Inflows
17
Simulated and Field-Estimated MeHg concentrations in surface sediments in Yolo Bypass
• Vegetated cells tend to have higher predicted MeHg concentrations• Field data are limited
20
21
Pasture Vegetated Core
Pasture Devegetated Core
Study used cores to investigate effect of vegetation on methylmercury concentrations
Mark Stephenson, Wes Heim, Gary Gill, Carol DiGiorgio, Dave Bosworth
Experimental studies have shown a vegetation effect on methylmercury
22Cores with vegetation had higher MeHg concentrations
Stephenson et al.
Cores with above-ground vegetation had more methylmercury…
Data Assembly
Model Calibration/Validation
Sensitivity Analysis
Scenario Testing
Yolo Bypass Delta
Not started Complete
Status of Tasks
Legend
Uncertainty Analysis
Model Development(except effects of vegetation)
Data Assembly
Model Calibration/Validation
Sensitivity Analysis
Scenario Testing
Uncertainty Analysis
Model Development(nearly completed)
27
What model inputs have the most influence on model results?(Sensitivity analysis)
Simulations are being carried to examine influence of…
• Tributary loads of solids, inorganic mercury, methylmercury
• Atmospheric loads of inorganic mercury
• MeHg production in Yolo Bypass and the Delta
• Vegetation
• Hydrology
28
Time
Base Case
Remediation Scenario
Pre
dic
ted
Me
rcu
ry c
on
cen
trat
ion
Model certainty: Are two model simulations meaningfully different?
How certain are these confidence limits??- Need to estimate uncertainty associated with inputs…
Using PEST software to help estimate confidence limits and uncertainty.
29
Summary
• Mechanistic mercury model framework developed for Yolo Bypass and Delta
• Simulations of existing conditions nearly complete
• System is very dynamic, especially Yolo Bypass.
• Vegetation appears to play important role in Yolo Bypass
• Sensitivity, uncertainty, and scenario analyses ongoing or about to be carried out30