a conceptual framework for the integration of the 2.0 web tools in lifelong learning scenarios

Grup de Tecnologies Interactives http://gti.upf.eduGTI

A Conceptual Framework for the A Conceptual Framework for the integration of the 2.0 Web Tools integration of the 2.0 Web Tools in Lifelong Learning Scenariosin Lifelong Learning Scenarios

M. Pérez-Sanagustín, P. Santos, A. Moghnieh, D. Hernández-Leo & J. Blat

TENCompetence – Sofia workshopOctober 2008


TENCompetence, Workshop Sofia, 2

Index I. Motivation

II. Aim

III. KRSM’s Activity Contexts

IV. Drawing a Selection Criterion

V. Conclusion



I. Motivation

Web as a user-centered platform for managing information

New interactions based on collaboration and cooperation through Web 2.0

New Space for Knowledge building



II. Aim

Context: Need of a flexible Knowledge Resource System Management (KRSM) in a Lifelong Learning context adapted to the diversity of learner’s necessities.

Problem: How can we use the Web 2.0 potential so that they can be integrated into a KRSM for supporting these different educational needs?

Proposal: A Conceptual Framework for the integration of Web 2.0 tools in learning environments adapted to the learner’s educational necessities




1. Relate the educational needs of the users in the KRSM scenarios with the activities supported by the Web 2.0 services



III. KRSM’s Activity Contexts1. Identify the activities that arise from the educational needs in the KRSM

scenario and relate them with the activities supported by Web 2.0 services





2. Cluster the educational needs in three Activity Context (AC) depending on the activities they engender




2. Cluster the educational need in three AC depending on the activities they engender.

Educational needs

Knowledge mining

Knowledge transfer

Knowledge personalization

Primitive Activities

Search/Find/Explore

Filter/Sort

Publish/Upload/Share

Bookmark

Edit/Write/Create

Rate

Tag

Comment

Download

Filter per tags

3 Activity contexts

Knowledge mining

Knowledge transfer

Knowledge personalization

SearchFilter/sort

Filter by tags

Download

BookmarkRate

Publish/Upload

Comment

Edit/WriteCreate

Tag





2. Cluster the educational needs in three Activity Context (AC) depending on the activities they engender

3. Each primitive activity determine the type of resources, Knowledge Objects (KO), that are manipulated in each AC



III. KRSM’s Activity Contexts3. Each primitive activity determine the type of resources, Knowledge

Objects (KO), that are manipulated in each AC

Select is the common

activity

that the user

performs

over any KO and which

connect all the AC

Which are the group of Web 2.0 tools that we should choose for covering all the ACs’

functionalities?



Filtering

IV. Drawing a selection criterion

1

3 42

5

Pre-filtering

Activity-centered filtering

KO-centered filtering

TOOLS5,2 & 3

TOOLS2 & 1



IV. Drawing a selection criterionPre-filtering

1. Select the tool that covers the maximum number of primitive activities in an AC

2. A service is selected if it handles the maximum number of KOs managed in this context

3. All the primitive activities and KOs have to be covered by the minimum Web 2.0 tools



IV. Drawing a selection criterionFiltering

Activity-Centered Fitering

1. The service has to offer the functionalities to cover the selected primitive activity

2. The best service would be the one that covers the maximum number of KOs for the selected primitive activity

3. Follow steps 1 and 2 till you reach your learning goal

KO-Centered Fitering

1. The service has to cover the maximum number of technical requirements of the selected KO.

2. The service would be that one that covers the maximum numbers of activity context which treat the selected KOs

3. Follow steps 1 and 2 till you reach your learning goal



IV. Drawing a selection criterionAn example

Services

Knowledge Mining Knowledge Transfer Knowledge Personalization

Filter /Sort Search Publish Edit Rate Comment Tag Bookmark

GroupMe X X X

Flickr X X X X X

Delicious X X X X X X

Drupal X X X X X X X

Youtube X X X X X X

Diigo X X X



V. Conclusion

A preliminary framework for the selection and integration of Web 2.0 services in a Technology Supported Learning Environment

The framework can be applied in different educational scenarios

The framework has provided a support to conceptualize the LearnWeb2.0 tool of WP5

An evaluation of this framework is planned in order to extract more requirements.



Thank you!

a conceptual framework for the integration of the 2.0 web tools in lifelong learning scenarios

Documents