a comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 april 2006 ola ekholm, karina...

22
A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten Grønbæk National Institute of Public Health

Upload: augustine-williamson

Post on 14-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen

and Morten Grønbæk National Institute of Public Health

Page 2: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 2

Background

•Self-reported alcohol intake

•Possible to link mortality and morbidity with drinking behaviour on an individual level

•The recommended guidelines for alcohol intake are, to a great extent, based on epidemiological studies that have

used self-reported information

Page 3: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 3

•More specific questions result in higher reported alcohol intake

•Beverage-specific questions

•Large time-variation in drinking

Page 4: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 4

Aim of the study

To compare the reported intake obtained by beverage-specific questions and to compare how different reference periods and response formats influence the self-reported

alcohol intake.

Page 5: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 5

Danish Health Interview Survey 2003

Sample n Response rate (%)

1 1000 64.72 1000 63.03 1000 65.54 1000 67.5

Inclusion criteria: Danish citizen aged 18 years or more.

Page 6: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 6

Characteristics of the respondents in each sample

by sex, age and marital status. Percentage

1 2 3 4Sex

Men 49 47 47 46

Age18-29 y. 18 14 18 1530-44 y. 29 30 29 3145-65 y. 34 38 36 3666+ y. 19 18 18 19

Marital statusMarried 56 55 55 54Cohabiting 14 17 18 13Single (separated, divorced, widowed)Single (unmarried) 17 15 16 17

Sample

14 13 12 16

Page 7: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 7

Question included in all four samples

How many alcoholic drinks did you have during last weekday? (don’t include Friday, it is considered part of the weekend)

No. of drinks Beer __

Strong beer __ Red & white wine __ Liqueurs __ Spirits __ Ready to drink products __

Page 8: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 8

1 bottle of beer = 1 drink 1 bottle of spirits = 25 drinks1 bottle of strong beer = 1.5 drinks 1 glass red/white wine = 1 drink1 bottle of red/white wine = 6 drinks 1 glas of liqueur = 1 drink1 bottle of liqueur 70 cl. = 10 drinks 1 glas of aquavit = 1 drink

1 drink = 12 grams of alcohol

Page 9: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 9

Alcohol intake on the most recent weekday

1 2 3 4Mean number of drinks 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2

At least one drink (%) 40 43 44 41

No. of respondents 644 626 650 673

Sample

Page 10: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 10

Sample1 How many alcoholic drinks did you have each day last week?

We'll start with yesterday and take one day at a time.

2 How many alcoholic drinks do you have each day in a typical week? We'll start with Monday and take one day at a time.

3 How many drinks did you have during the last weekend? (that includes Friday, Saturday and Sunday)

4 How many alcoholic drinks do you have on average per week?

Question

All questions were beverage-specific (beer; strong beer; red & white wine; liqueurs; spirits; ready to drink products)

Four different assessment methods for alcohol consumption

Page 11: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 11

The sex- and age-adjusted weekly mean number of alcoholic drinks

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

7- day recallmeasure (sample 1)

Intake each day ina typical week

(sample 2)

Average weeklyintake (sample 4)

Mea

n n

um

ber

of

dri

nks

Page 12: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 12

The age-adjusted weekly mean number of alcoholic drinks. Men

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

7- day recallmeasure (sample 1)

Intake each day ina typical week

(sample 2)

Average weeklyintake (sample 4)

Mean n

um

ber

of

dri

nks

Page 13: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 13

The age-adjusted weekly mean number of alcoholic drinks. Women

0

2

4

6

8

7- day recallmeasure (sample 1)

Intake each day ina typical week

(sample 2)

Average weeklyintake (sample 4)

Mean n

um

be

r of

dri

nks

Page 14: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 14

The Danish National Board of Health’s sensible drinking limits

Men: a maximum of 21 drinks per week

Women: a maximum of 14 drinks per week

Page 15: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 15

Results from a multivariate logistic regression analysis showing the association between a high reported weekly

alcohol intake and the different assessment methods

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

7- day recallmeasure (sample 1)

Intake each day ina typical week

(sample 2)

Average weeklyintake (sample 4)

Odds R

ati

o

Page 16: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 16

Conclusion

•A question concerning the intake in a typical week does not seem to underestimate the alcohol intake compared to the 7-

day recall measure

•Estimating the intake for a typical week will take the large time-variation in drinking into account

•The average weekly intake measure was less specific than the other two measures and the lower reported intake was

therefore as expected.

Page 17: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 17

Questions concerning binge drinking

Sample1 Within the past 3 months, how many times did you

have five or more drinks on a single occassion ?

2 Within the past 3 months, how many times did you have five or more drinks on a single occassion ?

3 Within the past year, how many times did you have five or more drinks on a single occassion ?

4 Within the past year, how many times did you have five or more drinks on a single occassion ?

Close-ended

Open-ended

Questions Response formatClose-ended

Open-ended

Page 18: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 18

Close-ended response categories

Never

Less than once a month

Approximately 1-3 times a month

Approximately once a week

More than once a week

Page 19: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 19

Binged at least once a week

Sample % OR 95% CI

1 10.1 1

2 4.1 0.38 (0.24-0.62)

3 11.3 1.15 (0.80-1.66)

4 4.2 0.41 (0.26-0.66)1-year

Response format

close-ended

open-ended

close-ended

open-ended

Reference period

3-month

3-month

1-year

Page 20: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 20

Binged at least once a month

Sample % OR 95% CI

1 41.5 1

2 34.6 0.75 (0.59-0.96)

3 39.3 0.90 (0.71-1.15)

4 25.4 0.47 (0.36-0.60)

Reference period Response format

3-month close-ended

1-year open-ended

3-month open-ended

1-year close-ended

Page 21: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 21

Conslusion

•The open-ended response format is not advisable when the reference period is long

•The analyses showed that the reference period was important for the self-reported intake for the open-ended questions. However, this was not the

case for the close-ended questions

Page 22: A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption 26 April 2006 Ola Ekholm, Karina Christensen, Katrine Strandberg Larsen and Morten

A comparison of different approaches to measure alcohol consumption

26 April 2006 Page 22

Summary

•A question concerning typical alcohol intake is feasible to use in epidemiological studies

•It is more appropriate to use close-ended questions compared to open-ended questions

when the reference period is long

•The length of the reference period seems to be ignorable for the self-reported frequency of binge

occasions when using close-ended questions