a comparative analysis of wildlife trafficking in australia, new zealand and the united kingdom

21
A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Upload: washi

Post on 23-Feb-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Outline. Purpose Methodology Findings Australia NZ UK Discussion. Purpose. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Page 2: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Outline

PurposeMethodologyFindings

Australia NZ UK

Discussion

Page 3: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Purpose

This study adopts a comparative approach incorporating illegal trade data obtained from the Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) online trade database.

This will further understanding of the geographic differences, which can then inform efforts to improve policy intervention and prevention strategies.

Page 4: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Methodology

CITES-listed species Incidents not totals (individual specimens or

weight)Reported to the Secretariat

Page 5: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Methodology

1975-2010All 178 countriesThe source ‘I’ for illegalWhilst the illegal wildlife was probably

confiscated or seized, the CITES data does not give this kind of information

The intention is to gain insight into the species targeted and geographic patterns as well as the type of products that are being smuggled

Page 6: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

Alliga

tors

Asian

/Afric

an El

epha

nts

Big Cats

Crocod

iles

Geckos

Hoodia

Marine

Mam

mals

Queen

Conch

Small

Cats

Torto

ises

0204060

Australia Illegal CITES Imports by Species 1988-2010

Genus/Species

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 7: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

African

Bush El

epha

nt

American

Ginsen

g

Birdwing

Butterfl

ies

Boa Con

stricto

rsCost

usCyca

d

Large

Polyp

Ston

y Cora

l

Monito

r Liza

rds

Orchids

Parro

tsPyt

hon

Reef B

uilding

Corals

Right W

hale

Seah

orses

Star C

orals

Tiger

Tree F

erns

050

100150200250300350400

Australia Illegal CITES Exports by Species 1982-2010

Genus/Species

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 8: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

Austr

ia

Czech R

epub

licJap

an

Netherl

ands

Norway

Singa

pore

South

Afric

a

Switz

erlan

d

Unkno

wn0

200400600800

Destination of Australian Illegal CITES Exports 1982-2010

Country

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 9: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

China

Hong K

ong

Malaysi

a

New Cale

donia

Papu

a New

Guinea

South

Afric

a

Thail

and UK US

Vietna

m0

20406080

Origin of Australian Illegal CITES Imports 1988-2010

Country

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 10: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

Africa

n Bush

Elep

hant

Bears

Boa C

onstr

ictors

Costus

Giant C

lam

Marine

Mam

mals

Orchids

Queen

Conch

Sea T

urtles Tig

er0

400800

1200

New Zealand Illegal CITES Imports 1989-2010

Genus/Species

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 11: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

Africa

n Bush

Elep

hant

Boat

OrchidsCact

us

Crocod

iles

Marine

Mam

mals

New Ze

aland

Tree

Fern

Orchids

Sea T

urtles

Sperm

Wha

le

Stony

Coral

Tree F

ern0

102030

New Zealand Illegal CITES Exports 1983-2010

Genus/Species

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 12: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

Austr

alia

Austr

iaChin

a

German

y

Indon

esia

New Ze

aland

Norway

Portu

gal

Russia

Singa

pore

Solom

on Isl

andsSp

ain

Swed

en UK

Unkno

wn US0

4080

120

Destination of New Zealand Illegal CITES Exports 1983-2010

Country

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 13: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

Austr

alia

China Fiji

Hong K

ong

Japan

Malaysi

aSa

moa

South

Afric

a

Thail

and

Unkno

w

Vanu

atu

Zimba

bwe

0200400600800

1000

Origin of New Zealand Illegal CITES Imports 1989-2010

Country

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 14: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

Africa

n Bush

Elep

hant

Asian

/Afric

an El

epha

nt

Cobras

Crocod

iles

Leopa

rd

Orchids

Pytho

ns

Stony

Coral

Torto

ises

0100200300

UK Illegal CITES Imports by Species 1980-2010

Genus/Species

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 15: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

African

Bush El

epha

nt

Asian E

lepha

ntBea

r

Caiman

Corcod

iles

Dabblin

g Duck

s

Giant C

lamHoo

dia

Marine

Mammals

Orchids

Pytho

n

Sea T

urtles

Snow

drops

Stony

Coral

Tegu

s Liza

rds Tiger

Walrus

020406080

100120140160

UK Illegal CITES Exports 1982-2010

Genus/Species

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 16: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

Angu

illa

Bahra

in

Canad

aChin

a

Czech R

epub

licIsr

aelJap

anKu

wait

Montse

rrat

New Ze

aland

Polan

d

South

Afric

a

Thail

and UK

020406080

100120140

Destination of UK Illegal CITES Exports 1982-2010

Country

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 17: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

Austral

iaBraz

ilChin

aFra

nce

Guyan

aInd

iaKe

nya

Malaysi

aNige

riaRuss

ia

South

Africa

Tanza

nia UAE

Unkno

wn

Zimba

bwe

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Origin of UK Illegal CITES Imports 1980-2010

Country

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 18: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Findings

Australia New Zealand UK02000400060008000

10000

Illegal CITES Imports and Exports 1980-2010

ImportsExports

Country

Num

ber

of In

cide

nts

Page 19: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Discussion

Not possible to determine if the trends witnessed are due to increased or decreased enforcements efforts, an increase or decrease in illegal activity or some combination

It does highlight the following:

Page 20: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Discussion

Australia Essentially no export of live wildlife CITES permits for imports too Harsh penalties

NZ Controlled imports and exports Relatively harsh penalties

UK Controlled imports and exports Moderate penalties

Page 21: A Comparative Analysis of Wildlife Trafficking in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Further Studies

NZ has the highest imports Because WEG detects more or if more is occurring?

Australia’s successConvictions and the use of the range of penaltiesTrade of marine species and corals ‘Unknown’ importer and exporterOverseas territories as a means of laundering or

smuggling