9 problem investigation methodology
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
1/14
Company Confidential
1 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi
PROBLEM INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
2/14
Company Confidential
2 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi
Contents
Problem investigation steps
Searching for common and difference Framework for KPI triggered troubleshooting an example model
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
3/14
Company Confidential
3 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi
Problem investigation steps
Understand what is the exact problem and when it appeared
Understand the scope of the problem
Get scenario/monitorings that show the problem
Search what is common for failures and what is different compared to
successful case
Make a conclusion and plan next step
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
4/14
Company Confidential
4 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi
What is the problem when did the problem appear
What is the problem
Is this problem KPI issue Is this end-to-end problem
What kind of tools and logs are needed
What is the RRC or RAB phase: setup/access/active/release
When did the problem appear? It was there from the beginning
After software upgrade
It has increased little by little
After HW upgrade
Something else?
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
5/14
Company Confidential
5 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi
Understand the scope of the problem
Is this problem:
Country specific problem? Customer specific problem?
Core specific problem?
One RAN specific problem?
One BTS/Cell specific problem?
RAB type specific problem? UE type specific problem?
Something else..
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
6/14
Company Confidential
6 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi
Get monitorings that show the problem
If problem is end-to-end problem
Arrange drive test When the problem appears, stop monitorings
If problem is KPI issue
Collect ICSU monitorings when the problem is on
Search for problem cases
Search for similar successful cases
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
7/14
Company Confidential
7 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi
Search common and difference
Search similar problems scenarios
What is common for the cases Search for scenarios, objects or affecting parameters
Example:
Typically the problem appears when Ue makes HHO
Typically related to one cell
Typically related to a call making Iur HO
Typically related to particular RAB type
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
8/14
Company Confidential
8 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi
Search common and difference
Success Failures cases: 1, 2, 3 & 4
#1
#1
#1
#1
#1
#4#3
#3
#2
#2
#2
#2
#4
#4
#4
#4
Search
difference
Searchcommon
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
9/14
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
10/14
Company Confidential
10 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi
Framework for KPI triggered troubleshooting onemodel
When a drop in a certain KPI is detected, the PIs of the KPI in question arefurther analysed, in order to find out the exact scenario where the fault takesplace.
Before applying the Framework presented in the following slides, these faultinvestigation steps should be performed and the following conditions should bemet.
The general alarm status of the network has been checked. No clear network alarmspointing to the root cause of the fault can be detected.
Traces from external interfaces of RNC have been taken with a protocol analyser inorder to record the fault scenario. Also RNC internal trace has been taken when thefault took place.
The basic fault scenario has been analysed and clarified.
More information on this model can be found from Masters Thesis of Mikko
Nieminen: Troubleshooting in Live WCDMA Networks
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
11/14
Company Confidential
11 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi
Yes
No
No
Use RNC Performance Tester to generate load
in test bed and perform analysis.
Has average network load increased
significantly and/or does the
problem occur at a specific time of day?
Is the problem new in the operator network?
No Yes
Yes
Analyse and
investigate the
differences between
the working and faulty
conditions.
NoYes
Yes
Perform simulation of the fault
in test bed.
Does the fault still occur?
No
Yes
No
New SW, HW, parameters, UE
model or feature introduced?
Is the fault operator
specific?
Analyse the traces. Investigate fault scope.
Perform simulation of the fault
with reference conditions.
Does the fault still occur?
A
B C
D
F
H
G
I
E
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
12/14
Company Confidential
12 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
13/14
Company Confidential
13 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi
Transmissionspecific
Node Bspecific
Servicespecific
RNCspecific
CNspecific
Countryspecific
UEspecific
In case of MVI environment, check IOT results and contact foreign vendor.
Investigate own vendors default parameters and compare implementation
againts 3GPP specifications.
Compare own default parameters with other default parameters of other vendors.
Execute air interface protocol analysis and drive tests.
Analyse network element and interface specific alarms, parameters, capacity, logs
and traces. Take specific actions depending on problem scope
(refer to detailed Framework notes).
J
Q
K L M N O
R
P
Analyse the traces. Investigate fault scope.I
-
7/30/2019 9 Problem Investigation Methodology
14/14
Company Confidential
14 2006 Nokia Problem Investigation Methodology.ppt / 2006-12--20 / JVi / MNi