70 ad_ the judgement of jerusalem by by william patton

THE JUDGMENT OF JERUSALEMPredicted in Scripture, Fulfilled in History

By William Patton (Written in 1876)

Table of Contents

I. THE CITY 11

II. THE TEMPLE 24

III. THE PREDICTION 44

IV. THE CAUSES OF THE WAR, AND THE SAFETY OF THE CHRISTIANS 54

70 AD: The Judgement of Jerusalem by By William Patton

http://www.letgodbetrue.com/reference/70AD/the-judgement-of-jerusalem-patton.php (1 of 296)09-04-2013 10:08:07


V. THE SIX SIGNS 74

VI. THE TRENCH AROUND THE CITY 99

VII. THE SUFFERINGS OF THE BESIEGED JEWS 106

VIII. THE TAKING OF THE CITY 147

IX. THE TEMPLE DESTROYED 169

X. SUBSEQUENT HISTORY OF THE JEWS 195

In a work on the destruction of Jerusalem as fulfilling the predictions of Christ, there can be no originality either in the terms of the prophecy or the facts which illustrate their accomplishment. We are necessarily dependent upon the historians of the age for the incidents of the siege. They must tell us what took place in connection with the ruin of the city and the temple, -- what military power was employed, - who was the general in command, -- and when the campaign commenced and ended.

Among these contemporary historians Flavius Josephus holds the chief place. He was a Jew, a Pharisee, and a priest ; he was familiar with the holy city and all it surroundings ; he was well



instructed in military affairs, and high in the confidence of the emperor, and Titus, the leader of the Roman forces. He was an eye-witness of, and perfectly acquainted with the circumstances of the siege. From the treasury of facts contained in his writings I have largely drawn. I have so collated, condensed, and arranged the statements as to make the account more concise, and easier to be understood. In many cases I have quoted directly from his Wars of the Jews, giving the references at the foot of the page. At other times I have given the substance of the detailed narrative, so condensed as to come within the space at my disposal, but retaining as far as possible the very words of the historian.

It gives me much pleasure to state that I have been much aided by the valuable work on the Prophecies by the Rev. Thomas Newton, Bishop of Bristol. I am also indebted the the Rev. Alexander Keith, D.D., for facts and authorities as recorded by him in The Evidence of Prophecy. To render my little volume more complete, I have gathered information from various authors, giving them credit in the body of the work. Whatever there is of originality will be found in the use made of facts and



the lessons deduced from them.

With the prayer that the Divine blessing may accompany the perusal of this volume, which aims to commend Christ the Redeemer to the love and confidence of all men, I commend it to "Zion's friends and mine."

W.P.

CHAPTER I

O, Jerusalem, Jerusa!em,Thou that killest the prophet,

And stonest them which are sent unto thee,How often would I have gathered

Thy children togetherWhen as a hen gathereth her chicks

Under her wings,And ye would not I

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

MATT. xxiii. 37, 38.http://www.letgodbetrue.com/reference/70AD/the-judgement-of-jerusalem-patton.php (4 of 296)09-04-2013 10:08:07


The Judgment of Jerusalem

The City.

" Beautiful for situation, the joy of the whole earth, is Mount Zion, on the sides of the north, the city of the great King:' PSA. xlviii. 2.

" Jerusalem is builded as a city that is compact together." PSA. cxxii. 3.

No spot on the face of the earth has clustered around it so much of intense and varied in. terest as the city of Jerusalem. It has been the theatre not only of the most sacred associations, but of the most brilliant military exploits. Seventeen times has it been sacked, and wholly or partially destroyed. Against it have been mustered the armies of the Egyptians, the Assyrians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Saracens, and the Crusaders. Almost from its first foundation it has been a field of bloody strife. Even to this day it is invested with a sacred and heroic charm peculiar



and distinctive.

In the time of Abraham it was called Salem, being the residence of Melchizedek. Josephus styles him the king of Solyma, which was changed into Hierosolyma. The psalmist, speaking of Jerusalem, says, "In Salem is His tabernacle, and His dwelling

place in Zion."1 The mountain of the land of Moriah, spoken of in Gen. xxii. 2, where Abraham was to offer Isaac, Josephus

says, was the mountain on which Solomon built the temple.2 When Salem fell into the hands of the Jebusites, it was by them named Jebus. Jerusalem, or "Habitation of Peace," most probably is a compound of Jebus and Salem, softened or euphonized. This name first occurs in Josh. x. I, where Adonizedec is named as its king. After the death of Joshua,

Judah is directed to fight against the Canaanites.3 They, with Benjamin, took Jerusalem, and set it on fire. From Judg. i. 21, we learn that "the children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites that inhabited Jerusalem." This statement has reference to the lower city, and not to the upper city, afterwards called Mount Zion, which the Jebusites then held, and which was

not conquered until it was taken by David.4http://www.letgodbetrue.com/reference/70AD/the-judgement-of-jerusalem-patton.php (6 of 296)09-04-2013 10:08:07


When David reigned over Judah alone he dwelt in Hebron. But when called to be king over all the tribes, he led his forces against the Jebusites, and conquered Mount Zion, or the upper city. Here he fixed his abode, and called it the City of David. Thus all Jerusalem belonged to Israel, and became the religious centre and political capital of the nation.

1 Psa. lxxvi. 2

2 Judges i. 1-8.

3 2 Chron. iii. 1.

4 2 Sam. v. 6, 7.

In its most flourishing state it consisted of four parts, built upon four hills, viz.: Zion, Acra, Moriah, and Bezetha. Of these, Zion was the highest, being 200 feet higher than Moriah. The whole foundation was a high rock with four summits. It was surrounded on three sides with deep valleys. " All around it,"



says the Rev. Dr. Edersheim, "on three sides, like a natural fosse, ran the deep ravines of the Valley of Hinnom and of the Black Valley, or Kedron, which merged to the south of the city, descending in such steep declivity that where the two meet is 670 feet below the point whence each had started. Only on the north-west was the city, as it were, bound to the main land. And, as if to give it yet more the character of a series of fortress islands, a deep natural cleft-the Tyropoeon-ran south and north through the middle of the city, then turned sharply westwards, separating Mount Zion from Mount Acra. Similarly, Acra was divided from Mount Moriah; and the latter again by an artificial valley from Bezetha, or the new town. Sheer up from these encircling ravines rose the city of marble and cedar-covered palaces. Up that middle cleft, down in the valley, and along the slopes of the hills, crept the busy town, with its streets, markets, and bazaars; but alone and isolated in its grandeur, stood the Temple-mount."

Beyond the high and massive walls were still higher mountains. The situation of the city was picturesque, as seen from the surrounding hill-tops. Hence the descriptive language of David:



"Beautiful for situation, the joy of the whole earth, is Mount Zion; on the sides of the north, the city of the great King." " Walk about Zion, and go round about her: tell the towers thereof. Mark ye well her bulwarks, consider her palaces." "Zion

the perfection of beauty." 1 After the division of the tribes it continued the capital of the kingdom of Judah. Its destiny was shaped by the character of its rulers. It prospered under the good, and was desolated under the bad, kings. Under Rehoboam (973 B.C.), it was conquered, by Shishak, king of

Egypt.2 Under Amaziah it was taken by Jehoash, king of Israel, who broke down 400 cubits, or about 600 feet, of the wall of the city, and took all the gold and silver, and all the vessels that

were found in the temple.3

After the death of Josiah, the people made Jehoahaz, his son, king, early in whose reign Necho, the king of Egypt, conquered Jerusalem, dispossessed him, and imposed upon the land an

annual tribute of goId and silver.4 At a later period, Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, "burnt the house of God, and brake down the wall of Jerusalem, and burnt all the palaces

thereof with fire, and destroyed all the goodly vessels thereof."5.http://www.letgodbetrue.com/reference/70AD/the-judgement-of-jerusalem-patton.php (9 of 296)09-04-2013 10:08:07


The city and temple being rebuilt under the edict of Cyrus, were again taken by Ptolemy of Egypt.

In 170 B.C. Antiochus Epiphanes gained possession of the city. He slew, in three days, 40,000 persons, and sold as many more into slavery. He razed its walls, forced his way into the holy of holies,

1 Psa. xlviii. 2, 12, 13; I. 2.

2 2 Chron. xii. 9.

3 2 Kings xiv. 13, 14.

4 2 Chron. xxxvi. 1-4.

5 2 Chron. xxxvi. 13-19.

and set up in the temple the image of Jupiter, and by the most tyrannical measures endeavoured to force the Jews into open idolatry. In 163 B. C., under the Maccabees, the Jews recovered



and repaired the city. They purified and furnished the temple. One hundred years after this, or 63 B.C., during the. contentions of the Maccabees, it was conquered by the Romans, under Pompey. In the year 43 B.C., the walls, which Pompey had destroyed, were rebuilt by Antipater, the father of Herod the Great. Under this Herod, vast sums were expended to fortify and embellish the city. The building of this city was the work of ages, and perhaps furnishes the most illustrious example of what human ingenuity and perseverance, with patriotic zeal, can accomplish.

Jerusalem was not only a city of great beauty, but was a walled fortress of wonderful strength. The whole base was a high rock, with four bold jutting eminences. The ascent was steep and difficult. Josephus says: "On the outside, these hills are surrounded by deep valleys, and by reason of the precipices on

both sides, they are everywhere unpassable."1 Dr. Robinson, who in 1838 made personal and careful admeasurements of the elevations of Mount Zion above the valleys, thus states them: " At the Jaffa Gate (Hippicus), 44 feet; at the southwest corner, 104 feet; at the south, 154 feet; at the south-east, 300 feet."



He adds, "The rock is in its natural state, and probably presents the same appearance as it did in the days of Josephus; though the

1 Wars, book v., c. 4, I.

adjacent valley has doubtless been greatly filled up with

rubbish."1 This is confirmed by the labours of the Palestine Exploration Fund.

In addition to this elevated position, insulated by deep and precipitous valleys, the city was further fortified with three massive, high walls. "Now, of these three walls," says Josephus, "the old one was hard to be taken, both by reason of the valleys, and of that hill (Zion) on which it was built." "It was also built very strong, because David and Solomon, and the following kings, were very zealous about the work." Upon the same authority we learn that the first wall completely surrounded Mount Zion. " It began at the north-western angle of Zion, at the tower of Hippicus, and ran along the northern



brow of Zion, where it crossed the cleft, and joined the western colonnade of the temple. It also inclosed Zion along the west and the south, and was continued eastward around Ophel, till it merged in the south-eastern angle of the temple. Thus the first wall would defend Zion, Ophel, and, along with the temple-walls, Moriah also." On the northern part of this were the famous towers of Phasalus and Mariamne. Dr. Robinson found distinct traces of this wall for a distance of 630 yards.

The second wall was built by Jotham, Hezekiah, and Manasseh, about 700 B.C. From 2 Chron. xxxii. 5, we learn that Hezekiah "built up all the wall that was broken, and raised it up to the towers, and another wall without." This one inclosed Mount

1 Biblical Researches, vol. i., pp. 387 and 390.

Acra, on which the lower city was built. Commencing at Hippicus, it ran north and a little east, to the present Damascus Gate; and from thence it rounded towards the east and south until it reached the tower of Antonia: thus the whole of the



lower city and the temple were amply protected. Traces of this wall have been found by Dr. Robinson and modern travellers, with some bevelled stones 7-1/2 feet long by 3-1/2 high.

The third wall, according to Josephus, was built mainly by Herod Agrippa, grandson of Herod the Great, twelve years after the crucifixion, and inclosed Bezetha, or the new city. This also started at the tower of Hippicus, and extended northward to the tower of Psephinus; then sweeping round towards the north-east and east to the sepulchres of the kings, thence easterly and south to the north-east corner of the temple area. The description of this wall, built by Herod, will give us some idea of the massive strength of the others. "Its parts were connected together with stones 30 feet long by 15 feet broad. This wall was 15 feet wide, and it would probably have had a height greater than that, had not his zeal who began it been hindered." After this, it was erected with great diligence by the Jews, as high as 30 feet, above which it had battlements of 3 feet, and turrets 4-1/2 feet in altitude, so that altogether the wall was 37-1/2 feet in height. In addition we further learn, "that the towers that were upon it were 30 feet in breadth, and 30 feet in height.



They were square and solid, as was the wall itself." "Of these towers the third wall had ninety, and the spaces between them were each 300 feet. But in the middle wall there were forty towers, and the old wall had sixty; while the whole compass of the city was thirty-three furlongs', or about four miles."

lt may be well to notice more in detail the principal towers, since they were points of great strength.

The Tower of Hippicus.-This in some respects is the most important, as Josephus makes it the starting place in all his descriptions of the three walls. It stood at the north-west corner of Mount Zion, or the upper city. It was built by the first Herod, and named after a valued friend slain in battle. It was 372- feet square, and for 45 feet it was built up solid.

Above this was a reservoir 30 feet deep. Above this again was a house 372- feet, of two stories, containing chambers. And still above this were breastworks 42- feet, with turrets, making the whole height of this tower 120 feet. The stones of which it was built were "very large and wonderful." They were of white marble 'cut out of the rock. Each stone was 30 feet in length, 15



feet in breadth, and 7! feet in depth. The Rev. Dr. Robinson, in 1838, found a portion of this tower still standing.

The Tower of Phasalus was built by Herod, and named after his brother. It was situated not far from Hippicus, on that part of the first wall which ran along the northern brow of Zion, from Hippicus to the temple. According to Josephus, "the breadth and height were each 60 feet." Over this a cloister went round 15 feet high. It was covered by breastworks and bulwarks. Above this cloister there was another tower, divided into rooms, with a place for bathing. It was also surmounted with battlements and turrets. The entire altitude was about 135 feet. It was this tower that Simon, the cruel leader of one of the factions, made his head-quarters.

The Tower of Mariamne was also built by Herod, and named after his queen. It stood on the same wall as the preceding, but nearer the temple. "It was solid for 30 feet. Its breadth and its length were each 30 feet." The upper apartments, built upon this solid foundation, "were more magnificent, and had greater variety than the other towers," as it was fitted up for his wife. The entire height was 75 feet.



The Tower of Psephinus was built by Agrippa, and was situated at the north-west corner of the third wall. It was eight-sided and 105 feet high, and commanded a most extensive prospect. It was of great strength; and as the north furnished the easiest approach to the city, this tower was regarded of the utmost importance. It had large cisterns for water.

The Tower or Citadel of Antonia.-In some respects this was the most considerable of all the towers, if indeed it may be called a tower. It occupied a large space, and embraced several buildings. Of it Josephus says: "Now on the north side of the temple was built a citadel whose walls were square and strong, and of exquisite firmness." It was built by the kings of the Asmonean race, and was first called Baris. Herod fortified it still more strongly, and in honour of his friend Antonius gave it the name of the Tower of Antonia. "It was situated at the north-west corner of two cloisters of the court of the temple, being erected upon a rock, and on the edge of a great precipice, and was 75 feet high." Josephus further states that "the rock on which it was built was itself covered over with smooth pieces of



stone, from its foundation, both for ornament, and that anyone who would either try to get up or go down might not be able to hold his feet upon it." "Next to this (on the brow of this precipice), and before you come to the edifice of the tower itself, there was a wall 4-1/2 feet high. But within that wall, all the space of the tower of Antonia itself was built upon to the height of 60 feet. The inward parts had the largeness and form of a palace, it being parted into all kinds of rooms and other conveniences, such as courts and places for bathing, and broad spaces for camps." The dimensions of this plot of ground was about 573 feet from north to south, and 955 feet from east to west. The historian adds: "As the entire structure resembled that of a tower, it contained also four other distinct towers at its four corners, Three of these were 75 feet high; but that which lay upon the south-east corner was 105 feet high, that from thence the whole temple might be viewed," On the southwest corner, where it joined to the two cloisters, it had passages to the temple, through which the guards of the Roman legion stationed here passed. It was into this tower, through one of these passages, that Paul was carried by the soldiers from the temple.



"There was also a secret passage built for Herod, from Antonia to the inner temple, at its eastern gate, over which he erected for himself a tower, that he might have a subterranean ascent to the temple, in order to guard against any sedition which might be made by the people against their kings."

This tower was separated from Bezetha, on the north, by a deep artificial trench, to prevent any approach from that quarter. It is the opinion of Dr. Robinson that the rock on which this fortress stood was a prolongation of the hill Bezetha towards the south, which was cut through and separated from that hill by the trench above named. He supposes that the main fortress of Antonia lay upon this rock or ridge; whilst the remaining part, comprising the halls and palace-like apartments, and the barracks, extended along the northern wall of the temple area quite to its north-east corner, adjacent to the Valley of Kedron. On the north it was protected by this deep trench.

There is another element of strength in the valleys within the city, and which, within the walls, completely separated its different sections from each other. Besides the wall all round



Mount Zion, or the upper city, there was a deep valley on the north side, called the Tyropoeon, or the Valley of the Cheesemongers. This also separated Zion from Mount Moriah; over this a bridge was built from Zion to the temple. This also shut off Acra, or the lower city, from Zion, as also in part from Moriah. Dr. E. Robinson remarks that "the Tyropoeon as it comes down from the wall, near the great mosque, is also steep, and forms a deep ravine, with banks almost precipitous." Without and around, on three sides of the city, are the vaIleys of Gihon, Hinnom, and Jehoshaphat. Opposite these surrounding valleys rise mountains, which are more elevated than the city. On the east is the Mount of Olives. On the south-east is the Mount of Offence. On the south is the Hill of Evil Counsel, and on the west is Mount Gihon. This explains the language of David: "As the mountains are round about Jerusalem, so the Lord is round about His people, from

henceforth even for ever."1 Thus the approach to the city of an invading army, with their cumbrous implements of war, would be both tardy and difficult.

Such is a very rapid glimpse of the situation and strength of http://www.letgodbetrue.com/reference/70AD/the-judgement-of-jerusalem-patton.php (20 of 296)09-04-2013 10:08:07


Jerusalem. Perhaps there never was a city so strongly fortified by natural position, and by walls and towers of almost incredible massiveness and magnitude. Altogether it would seem impossible to take it by any power which man, with the then implements of war, could bring against it.

1. Psa. cxxv. 2.

CHAPTER II

THE TEMPLE

" And as He went out of the temple, one of His disciples saith unto Him, Master, see what manner of stones and what buildings are here! And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down." MARK xiii. x, 2.

In order to appreciate the force of the prediction and the terribleness of its fulfilment, it is necessary that we should form



some accurate idea of the position and structure of the temple, with its walls, courts, and towers. Only thus can we trace out the course of the siege, and understand the aggravated miseries which the people endured from the assaults of the foes without and the turbulence of the factions within Jerusalem.

Many persons mislead themselves by supposing that the temple, designed for the worship of God, resembled the massive structures of Egypt and Greece, devoted to idol worship; or, if not built after these ancient models, that, perhaps, it more nearly resembled the splendid cathedrals of modern times. The description given us in the Old Testament, as well as that of Josephus, will correct all such imaginings.

The tabernacle erected by Moses in the Arabian desert was not formed after the device or arrangement of man. It was unfolded in its entire plan by God Himself. He gave to Moses, at Sinai, minute directions as to the form and size of the structure, the materials to be employed, and the sacred utensils that were to belong to it. During all the journeyings of the Israelites in the wilderness, and for several centuries after their settlement in Canaan, the tabernacle continued to be the place of public



worship, though its location was changed several times. When the nation became consolidated and prosperous, it seemed proper that a more permanent structure should be reared. The first person who conceived the thought of the erection of a massive permanent edifice for the worship of God was King David. Though for the reasons clearly stated he was forbidden to carry out his design, he nevertheless made preparations for it by the accumulation of treasures and materials. The plan was fully carried out by Solomon.

It was modelled after the tabernacle, though twice as large, being I05 feet long, 35 feet broad, and 52-1/2 feet high. Thus the temple had no human architect. It was unlike any other structure for religious uses that had ever been built. Nor has it ever been copied by architects of any succeeding age. It stood unique and alone during all the ages of its diversified history.

Its magnificence did not consist in the size of the principal building, but in the preciousness of the materials, the richness of the ornaments, the excellency of the workmanship, and the number, extent, grandeur, and substantial masonry of its



surrounding courts, corridors, chambers, walls, and towers. The uaos, or shrine, distinctively the temple, in which was the holy place and the holy of holies, occupied only a small part of the large inclosure of courts and cloisters and buildings to which the general designation of temple has been given.

The temple, with its ample and massive inclosures, stood upon the rocky summit of Mount Moriah, the spot where Abraham was directed to offer up Isaac in sacrifice. Josephus tells us that the "plain on the top was hardly sufficient for the holy house and the temple, for the ground about it was very uneven, and like a precipice." In order to secure a more extended surface it became necessary to lay the foundations deep in the valley below. This was done by Solomon in the following manner. He first built up a wall on the east side, which was filled in with earth to a level with the top of the hill. On this he erected cloisters. But as this left the temple naked and exposed on the other parts, other walls were erected, and the inclosure filled up, which greatly enlarged the summit of Mount Moriah. These walls on the north, the east, and the south were built up from the bottom of the hill, and were of immense strength as well as



height. They reached to the height of 450 feet from the deep foundations in the valley, and in some places more.

Yet did not the depth of the entire foundations appear, for they brought earth, and filled up the valleys. In the construction of these foundations, immense rocks were laid together, and firmly bound to each other, and by iron were fastened to the sides of the mountain. They were so morticed into each other, and so wedged into the mountain, that the strength of the basis was not less admirable than the superstructure. Josephus states that "the stones used in the walls were not only of the largest size, being 60 feet long, 30 feet thick, and 24 feet wide, but they were hard and firm enough to endure all weather." Dr. Robinson intimates that, as Josephus wrote his history at Rome, and at considerable time after the destruction of Jerusalem, he could not give the exact measurements of heights and magnitudes. He says that "Josephus certainly never took the length and breadth and height of the buildings." How he arrives at this certainty he does not state. That Dr. Robinson was not present, and did not see Josephus apply the measuring-tape, is certainly true; but this does not prove that Josephus did not accurately



ascertain the dimensions of the walls, the temple, and the stones above ground, for he was long a resident of Jerusalem, a Pharisee, and a prominent man in the nation. As a priest he had access to all places and documents; and we know him to have been of a curious and observing turn of mind. Dr. Robinson thinks that the statements of Josephus as to the size of the stones are only matters of estimate and conjecture. But we have other and corroborative testimony. "In the, sub-basement of the great temple at Baaldek, there is one stone 60 feet in length by I2 in breadth and thickness, with others of not greatly inferior size; while in a neighbouring quarry are stones of equal and greater dimensions, cut and ready for use, one of them being no less than 70 feet in length, by 14 feet 5 inches in thickness." The following extract from M. Volney, in relation to Baalbek, will help the credibility of Josephus: "What is still more astonishing is the enormous stones which compose the sloping wall. To the west the second layer is formed of stones which are from 28 to 35 feet long, by about 9 feet in height. Over this layer, on the north-west angle, there are three stones, which alone occupy a space of 175-1/2 feet: viz., the first, 58 feet 7 inches; the second 58 feet 11 inches; and the third exactly 58



feet; and each of these is 12 feet thick. These stones are of white granite, with large shining flakes, like gypsum. There is a quarry of this kind of stone under the whole city, and another in the adjacent mountains, which is open in several places. On the right as we approach the city, there is still lying there a stone hewn on three sides, which is 69 feet 2 inches long; 12 feet 10 inches broad; and 13 feet 3 inches in thickness."

At Sais, on the Nile, is a colossus dedicated to Amasis, who commenced the new dynasty in Egypt, 75 feet long. Pompey's Pillar, at Alexandria, "is a single piece of granite 73 feet high, and 28 feet 8 inches in circumference, is raised on a pedestal 20 feet high, and is surmounted by a vast Corinthian capital." At Heliopolis, near Cairo, is the obelisk of On, which is more than 68 feet above the pavement. It is standing in its original place, where it has stood 4000 years. At Assouan the old builders have left unfinished, in the quarry, a huge granite obelisk 95 feet long. The Egyptian obelisk at Rome is a shaft of red granite, 85 feet high, and 9 feet square.

As late as 1838 Dr. Robinson, after all the overturnings and


70 AD: The Judgement of Jerusalem by By William Pattonrebuildings of Jerusalem and its walls, and the debris of ages, found some very large stones. One he measured was 24 feet long, by 3 feet high, and 6-1/2 feet broad. Another was 30 feet 10 inches long, by 6-1/2 feet broad. The doctor admits that the valleys have the appearance of having been filled up with rubbish. From the Palestine Exploration Fund we learn that at the north-east corner they sunk a shaft 80 feet before they reached the original rock on which the foundation-stones were laid. In other localities their shafts varied from 50 to 100 feet. From these excavations they reached the original foundations. The debris was unequal, in some places being 120 feet deep, consisting of loam, shingle, or broken pieces of cut stone, potsherds, lamps, and other rubbish thrown out from the city, or the deposits of investing armies.

The space secured for the temple-plot was 955 feet from east to west, and the same from north to south. Including the tower of Antonia, it was 1528 feet from north to south, and 955 from east to west. Upon this platform were erected the structures generally known as the temple. "They were not all on a level, but rose terrace upon terrace, till the sacred edifice itself was reached, its porch protruding, shoulder-like, on either side, --



perhaps rising into two flanking towers and covering the holy and most holy places." "Alone, and isolated in its grandeur, stood the temple-mount. Terrace upon terrace its courts rose, tiIl high above the city, within the enclosure of marble cloisters, cedar-roofed, and richly ornamented, the temple itself stood out a mass of snowy marble and of gold, glittering in the sunlight against the half encircling green background of Olivet." "Thus, must the golden fane have been clearly visible from all parts; the smoke of its sacrifices slowly curling up against the blue eastern sky, and the music of its services wafted across the busy city; while the sunlight glittered from its gilt roofs, or

shone from its pavement of tesselated marble." 1 This graphic description of the Rev. Dr. Edersheim makes vivid the temple in its grandeur.

The first temple was built by Solomon 1005 years B.C., in the fourth year of his reign. It was completed in about seven years. One hundred and eighty-three thousand persons were employed. Of these one hundred and fifty-three thousand were Canaanites, being the bearers of burdens, hewers of wood, and overseers. There were thirty thousand Jews who also rendered



service. These were divided into companies of ten thousand each, and served in rotation. As all the materials were prepared away from the site of the temple, these immense structures

were put together without the sound of any tool.2

1 The Temple, its Ministry and Services at the Time of Jesus Christ.

2 1 Kings vi. 7.

These buildings remained undisturbed in their pristine splendour only thirty-three years. At that time the temple was plundered

and damaged by Shishak, king of Egypt.1 This temple stood 424 years before its final destruction by the king of Babylon, B.C. 588.

About 539 B.C., Cyrus gave permission to the Jews to return from their captivity to their own country, and to rebuild Jerusalem and the temple. Under the superintendence of Zerubbabel, the Jewish governor, and Joshua the high-priest, the work was commenced and vigorously prosecuted. This



building was erected on the site and foundations of the first temple, and on the same plan, though inferior in grandeur and

in beauty.2 During the twelve years' wars, which raged between 175 and 163 B.C., it was pillaged and desecrated by Antiochus Epiphanes, who introduced into it idolatrous rites, dedicating the temple to Jupiter Olympus. This temple became so desolate that it was overgrown with vegetation. Judas Maccabeus, having expelled the Syrians, restored the sanctuary, and erected new fortifications against future attacks. During the contentions among the later Maccabees, Pompey, 63 B.C., attacked and took the temple, massacred 12,000 Jews in its courts, and

entered the holy of holies.3 In 37 B.C., Herod the Great, with his Roman troops, stormed the temple, destroyed some of the surrounding halls, and damaged others.

1 1 Kings xiv. 25; 2 Chron. xii. 9.

2 Ezra iii. I2; Hag. ii. 3.

3 Antiquities, book xiv. c. 4.



THE TEMPLE OF HEROD. -- Herod the Great was an Idumean, and high in the favour of Julius Caesar. He obtained the kingdom of Judea from the Romans, to whom Palestine with all the neighbouring country was subject. He was the most distinguished of his family for talent, success, and magnificence. By reason of his cruelties he became exceedingly unpopular among the Jews. Finding it for his interest to propitiate them, he undertook the work of repairing, or rather of rebuilding the temple. Josephus says that Herod did not at once take down the temple of Zerubbabel to make room for the more splendid one he purposed to build, because of the jealous fear of the Jews, lest when he had pulled down the whole edifice he would not be able to rebuild it. He promised them that he would not remove their temple until all things were made ready for building it entire. He got ready one thousand wagons to bring stones; he employed ten thousand skilful workmen, beside stone-cutters and carpenters; then he began to tear down and build up. Eighteen thousand men were employed. The work was commenced in the eighteenth year of Herod's reign, which was B.C.21. It was so far completed as to be fit for use in nine



years. The successors of Herod continued building operations, to carry out more perfectly the desig'n of Herod the Great. So it was correct for the Jews to say that forty-six years had been

occupied in its building.1 A more particular description of the internal arrangements, especially of the walls and gates, with the

1 John ii. 20.

successive elevations, will be necessary, so as to understand its strength as a fortress, and the fearful scenes which took place within its sacred enclosures.

From 2 Chron. iii. I, we know that the temple was built upon the Mount Moriah. The outer wall was of great height and thickness, and was built up more than thirty feet above the top of the mountain. Upon this wall, but extending within, were built cloisters, or covered colonnades. These rested on the wall and rows of pillars 37-1/2 feet high, and "the thickness of each was



such that three men might with their arms extended reach around them." Each of these pillars was of one entire stone of white marble. On the north, east, and west there were three rows, forty pillars in each row, making two aisles or walks between; but on the south there were four rows of forty pillars, being 15 feet from centre to centre, making three aisles or walks, that is, two of 30 feet wide, and one of 45 feet wide, giving a space of 105 feet on this side, which was the royal porch. The middle one of the three was twice as high, so that its roof was raised as much as 37-1/2 feet above the roofs of the common walks, and spread itself out on high at the distance of 75 feet from the broad and beautiful pavement beneath. When a person stood above on the roof of this middle walk, he could hardly look down into the valley on the outside of the wall without becoming dizzy, the distance to the bottom of it was so fearfully great. "The view from the top of this colonnade," says Rev. Dr. Edersheim, "into Kedron was the stupendous depth of 450 feet. Here some have placed that pinnacle of the temple, to which the tempter brought our Saviour." It was from this that

He was urged to precipitate Himself.1



The pavements were laid with flat variegated stones. "The natural magnificence and excellent polish, and the harmony of the joints in the cloisters, afforded a prospect that was very remarkable. Nor was it on the outside adorned with any work of

the painter or engraver."2 This court, sometimes denominated the "outer court," and also "the mountain of the house," but more generally the "court of the Gentiles," was reached from the outer wall by a flight of eight steps. This court was a favourite resort of the Jews. It became a place of trade, where the money-changers sat, and the various birds and animals for sacrifice were sold. From this Christ expelled the money-changers. It was here also that the Christians could daily

assemble with one accord.3

These extensive cloisters, besides being pleasant retreats in warm and rainy weather, also furnished very large accommodations for many and various purposes. Here the Levites resided. Here also was a synagogue where the Talmudic doctors, or expositors of the law, might be questioned, and where their disciples might be heard. It was here that Jesus, at the age of twelve years, was found "sitting in the midst of the



doctors, both hearing them and asking them questions."4 Here were halls, or apartments, where the rabbis addressed and

1 Matt. iv. 5-7.

2 Josephus

3 Acts ii. 46.

4 Luke ii. 46.

disputed with their hearers. In these it was that Christ improved His opportunities for addressing the people, and of refuting the cavillers who sought to entrap Him. In the southern portion were the royal halls, which were more spacious than those on the other three sides. The principal gate of entrance was on the east side, and was reached by a flight of many steps from the valley below. This is generally supposed to be the one which in Acts iii. 2, 10, is called the Beautiful Gate. By this the worshipper entered the court of the Gentiles.



As the visitor passed through this court toward the second one, he found on all sides an elegantly ornamented wall or balustrade, 4-1/2 feet high. On this stood pillars, at equal distances, declaring, some in Greek, and some in Roman letters, the law of purity, that no foreigner nor unclean person could come within that sanctuary. The ascent from the wall of separation to the inner smaller enclosure was by fourteen steps. Next, and still higher, we find a wall 60 feet high from its foundation on the outer side, and 37-1/2 feet high on the inner side. Through a gateway and by a flight of fifteen steps the court of the women was reached. This wall must have been of great thickness to have required so many steps, and must have been erected on a precipitous slope, as indicated by the difference of 22-1/2 feet in the height of the outer and the inner wall. Again, fifteen steps higher up was the principal entrance to the court of the Israelites. On the other sides-north, south, and west-only five steps led up from the court of the women to that of the men. This shows the inequality of the surface. Over the gates were structures more than 60 feet high. Each gate was adorned with two columns, which were 18 feet in circumference. "In these gates were folding doors, each of which were 45 feet



high and 20 feet wide, and were plated with gold and silver. The eastern was the principal gate. It was of Corinthian brass, and was higher and larger, and more adorned with precious metal than the rest."



The court of the priests, or the most sacred enclosure, into which none but the priests were permitted to enter, was separated from that of the Israelites by a stone balustrade, and was reached by an ascent of five steps. The whole space occupied by this court, including the "Naos," or temple proper, was from east to west 277-1/2 feet, and from north to south 197-1/2 feet, or 132,881 square feet. Massive and spacious



buildings surrounded this enclosure except on the west side. These buildings were used as magazines, in which were stored wine, oil, corn, salt, wood, water, lambs for sacrifice, garments, musical and other instruments. There were spacious accommodations for the priests and Levites when engaged in their course of duty. On the south side was a large hall for the meetings of the Sanhedrin. In the large open court within these buildings, and in front of the temple, was the great altar and the brazen sea.

The Naos, or the temple proper, was on a still higher elevation, reached by twelve steps. It had a court on the north and south sides. Upon this high summit of Moriah the temple was situated, not quite in the centre, but rather to the north-western corner, and thus was visible from all parts of the city, as well as the surrounding country. As the innermost court was higher up than all the others, the temple could be seen high up and glorious from every place within the vast enclosure. This temple was oblong, being 90 feet long, 30 feet broad, and 45 feet high. Including the thickness of the walls, with the side chambers and the porch, its front was 150 feet, and its depth 75 feet. The



porch, or vestibule, in front was 180 feet high, 30 feet broad, and 15 feet deep. This porch was open in front, and had near the entrance two massive pillars called Jachin and Boaz,-each I8 feet in circumference, and 54 feet high.

The main building was 54 feet high, except the holy of holies, which was only 30 feet high. The interior was divided into two parts, viz., the holy place, in which was the altar of incense, the golden candlestick, and the table of shewbread. The second was the holy of holies, in which was the ark of the covenant. The internal finish was the most elaborate and ornamental. Gold and silver and precious woods were lavishly used. The floor was of cedar overlaid with planks of fir. The door which opened to the sanctuary was covered with gold, and turned upon hinges of gold.

A topographical plan exhibits five or six elevations, with walls of great thickness and massive gates. If the outer wall was either broken through, or its gates battered down, the invaders would find in front of them a narrower standing-place and another wall high and strong. When this was penetrated, still other defences must be demolished. This series of fortresses extended clear up



to the Naos or temple proper, at the summit, which was in some respects the most impregnable and the hardest to be taken.

From this rapid outline of the plan of the temple, with its cloisters, its various courts and massive walls which enclosed them, it must be plain that it was immensely strong, and formed perhaps the most impregnable of all the fortresses.

This is the structure to which the disciples referred: "Master, see what manner of stones and what buildings are here." It was of these that Christ said, "Seest thou these great buildings? There shall not be left one stone upon another that shall not be thrown down." No wonder that to the disciples it appeared impossible for this prediction ever to be fulfilled. No wonder that they who could not distrust the words of their Lord, supposed that their fulfilment could only be when the deep foundations of the earth should be upheaved, and when the fires of the judgment should burn up this world. "When shall these things be, and what shall be the sign of Thy coming and of the end of the world ?"



How true it is that the security of nations does not lie in their wealth, in the strength of their bulwarks, or the magnificence of their religious establishments. Probably no place was stronger in natural position, in massive walls and towers, than Jerusalem. No religious observances were more grand and imposing, and no temple so gorgeous and so costly in treasures of gold and silver and precious stones and woods; and withal a fortress so compact and impregnable. And no city, by reason of its granaries and reservoirs of water, was more capable of successful resistance to any siege. So also its wealth could secure all needful supplies; for at no time or place was gold and silver so abundant. Still Jerusalem was to be destroyed, for "Except the Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain." The reason why this city could not stand was sin, unrepented of, and persevered in with delight. As certainly as sin will sting any man to death, so also sin wiII sting a nation to death. The sins of a nation are the combined sins of individuals. Where the corrupt acts of the lawmaking power are approved and sustained by the people, they become national. When the wrong is persisted in without repentance, then the nation becomes so corrupt that the vials of destruction are emptied



upon them. Of the Jewish nation, Josephus says "that the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah were but smaIl in comparison of those the Jews were guilty of, so that they were ripe for destruction. If the Roman army had not come when it did, I do verily believe that either an earthquake would have swallowed up the city, or a deluge overflowed them, or fire from heaven have consumed them."

When the temple became an object of idolatrous regard, and the people showed more respect for it than for the Divine commands, when the spirit of true worship was displaced by a superstitious devotion to and reliance upon mere ritual services, so that the punctilious observance of external rites and ceremonies was regarded as religion, -then God treats with loathing and abhorrence the most costly and magnificent demonstrations of worship. As the soul of true devotion is gone, He regards as worthless the temple itself, and all its splendid ritual. The Jewish nation were corrupt beyond recovery in their civil and their ecclesiastical organizations, and these must needs be wiped out.



In what God has done with the ancient nations we may be admonished, and learn that the stability of a country rests upon the virtue of the people, in their intelligence, their reverence, and their inflexible determination to do right. "Righteousness exalteth a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people."

CHAPTER III

The Prediction.

" And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and His disciples came to Him for to show Him the buildings of the temple. And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down." MATT. xxiv. I, 2.

"And as He went out of the temple, one of His disciples saith unto Him, Master, see what manner of stones and what buildings are here! And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down." MARK xiii. I, 2.



"And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, He said, As for these things which ye behold, the days will come, in the which there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down." LUKE xxi. 5, 6.

About fifteen hundred years before the Roman armies conquered Jerusalem, Moses uttered words of solemn warning: "The Lord shall bring a nation against thee from far, from the ends of the earth, as swift as the eagle flieth; a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand; a nation of fierce countenance, which shall not regard the person of the old, nor show favour to the young: . . . and he shall besiege thee in all thy gates until the high and fenced walls come down, wherein

thou trustedst."1

1 Deut. xxviii. 49-52

Before the utterance of this warning, Moses had assured the people that rich and permanent blessings would be their



portion, if they should hearken diligently to the voice of the Lord their God, to observe and to do all His commandments; then the Lord would set them on high above all nations of the earth, and bless them in all their relations. Obedience would make them a virtuous and reverential people, would be a perfect protection against their enemies and national sufferings, and secure to them the continued protection and favour of the Lord. Only one thing could stay the blessings, and draw upon them the manifestations of the Divine anger. This one thing was sin, habitual and persevering disobedience, - this made their wickedness to be corrupting and destructive. Other prophets threatened them with sword, famine, and pestilence; with slavery and the ploughing up of their holy city like a field.

With a perfect knowledge of all the prophetic warnings, with an unerring estimate of the moral character of the nation, and with a full knowledge of the massiveness of the temple, as well as the number and strength of the walls encircling the city, our Lord boldly uttered His most wonderful prediction. He seizes upon the destiny of a proud people, and fearlessly tells them of their certain and speedy overthrow. Although everything in the



then political condition of the Jews, as well as in the structure of the temple and the city, forbad almost the possibility of the speedy fulfilment of this prophecy, still He fixed the time for its fulfilment as not distant, but near at hand, before that

generation should pass.1

1 Matt. xxiv. 34; Mark xiii. 30; Luke xxi. 32.

He staked all His claim to be the Messiah upon its perfect fulfilment: "Now I tell you before it come, that when it is come to pass ye may believe that I am He," that is, the promised Messiah. He not only uttered this prediction, but designated the signs which, with unerring certainty, would precede and foreshadow the coming doom.

The time when this prophecy was uttered.- It was not until God had borne with the Jews with great long-suffering,-not until He had exhausted all practicable means for their recovery,-not until they had slain the prophets who were His messengers,-not until they had despised and rejected the Redeemer, God's only Son,



and had with murderous intent determined upon His death, and had thus filled up the cup of their iniquity,-then, and not till then, did He with heart-felt lamentations pronounce the dread sentence: "0 Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate."1 "And when He was come near, He beheld the city, and wept over it, saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes. For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side, and shall lay thee even with the ground,

1 Matt. xxiii. 37,38; Luke xiii. 34.

and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of



thy visitation,"1 He wept, because He saw "the clouds of heaven gathering over it from every quarter, fraught with materials of destruction such as none but a Divine hand could collect,"-He saw "His own blood, by which He had graciously meant to wash away their guilt, calling with a voice not to be denied, for the ministers of justice to arm,"-He wept, for "He saw all things on earth and in heaven mustering and disposing for their doom." "He looked, and lo! the city was beleaguered and lost; Jerusalem lay bleeding at His feet; the harpy nations had taken their prey; her dwellings of holiness were laid waste; and the sound of her expiring lament, drowning even the voice of justice itself, pierced His heart." He stood and wept over it. "Like the thunder-cloud, which, having discharged its bolt at the earth, weeps itself away, exhausting itself in the healing shower, which closes the rent it has made; so His pity commiserates and pours itself forth over those whom in the same breath He had felt himself called upon to sentence."

Christ had paid His last visit to the temple, and with His disciples had left the city, and passed over the brook Kidron and up the slope of Olivet. Here, He sat down with Jerusalem and



the temple full in view; when the disciples asked Him, "When shall these things be, and what shall be the sign when all these

things shall be fulfilled?"2 They could not

1 Luke xix. 41-44.

2 Mark xiii. 4.

doubt His word, "there shall not be left one stone (of the temple) upon another that shall not be thrown down;" but they were perplexed when they looked upon the massive walls, the towers and ramparts of the city, and the immense and solid buildings of the temple. Here, where He had so recently wept, He made mention of the signs which were to precede, as well as the circumstances of misery which were to attend the destruction. This prediction was written and published to the world many years before its fulfilment. It is recorded by

Matthew. Of this Gospel the Rev. Dr. Eadie says,1 "It is supposed to have been written five years after Christ's ascension, or about the year 38. Some hold that it existed at a



very early period both in the Hebrew and Greek languages." If this date be accepted as accurate, the prophecy was published and circulated in Palestine full thirty years before its accomplishment. It was also recorded by both Mark and Luke, who wrote their Gospels fifteen years before the Roman armies besieged the sacred city. Matthew, Mark, and Luke suffered martyrdom under Nero, and thus were dead before the destruction took place. The fact is evident that for many years prior to its fulfilment this remarkable prophecy was published in Palestine, and soon afterwards was diffused throughout the world.

The time of the fulfilment was fixed.- When His disciples said, "Tell us when shall these things be?" He said, "The time draweth

near." "This generation shall not pass away till all be fulfilled."2 He then

1 Biblical Cyclopedia.

2 Luke xxi. 8, 32.



names the specific signs which must precede, saying, "When ye shall see all these things (signs), know that it is near, even at the doors." When on His way to Calvary, He said to the great company of people and women who followed Him bewailing and lamenting, "Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for Me, but weep for yourselves and for your children; for behold the days are coming in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps that never gave suck." He thus told them that they would be the witnesses, and some of them the participants of these miseries. Within the natural lifetime of some of those who heard Him all that He had predicted would certainly come to pass.

The Witness.- It is a matter of devout gratitude that the principal witness for the fulfilment of this remarkable prophecy is Flavius Josephus, a trustworthy Jewish historian. He was born A.D. 37, and died A.D. 93, thus living through the whole of the siege. He was from his childhood intimately acquainted with the localities, -with the position, the walls, the towers, the bulwarks, and all the defences of the city. Being a priest, of the sect of the Pharisees, he was familiar with the views and



expectations of the Jews. He had a thorough knowledge of the temple,-its extent, its various buildings, and their uses, --the massiveness of its structure, and its immense strength as a defensive fortress. Thus, as no other historian, he was competent intelligently to know and to record the facts. His advantages for knowing what took place were peculiar, for he was in the favour of Vespasian, the Roman emperor. He accompanied him during part of the war, and was present at the siege. He continued with the army when Titus took the command. He was employed in several important embassies, and strove by all proper means to save the city and his countrymen from ruin. Soon after the destruction of the city and the temple, he returned with Titus to Rome, and there published his history of the Jewish wars. In this is found the most minute and circumstantial account of the siege, and the destruction of the city and the temple. This history was written virtually in the presence of the army of Titus, who had been with him on the spot, were personally acquainted with the localities, and were competent to detect any misstatements. This history supplies the most ample materials. Under the influence of patriotism he may have exaggerated some of his statements. Still, in no



instance would he be tempted to understate the facts. It formed no part of his purpose to confirm the prediction made by Christ. Yet in his account of the siege his testimony is ample that our Lord's prediction was in every particular perfectly fulfilled. This is done, not by referring to the prophecy, or tracing out its accomplishment, but simply by a circumstantial record of the facts. He tells us who were the leaders, how the different factions arose,-how the provisions, sufficient for a siege of three years, were destroyed, -how the inhabitants were plundered,-how the miseries of famine and pestilence, superadded to the war, intensified their sufferings,-how the fightings by day and by night wore out the people,-how the corridors and other structures, with the tempIe, were burnt, despite all the efforts to save them, and how the city lay in ruins. These, and many more incidents, fill up his history. As we gather them up, and place them in order alongside the multiplied and various items of the prediction, we notice how they fit into each other, the history answering to the prophecy.

Had such a history been written by a Christian, there would have been room for suspicion that friendly feelings gave a



colouring to the facts. But when a Jew, a priest, and a Pharisee writes the history of his own nation, and states the facts which confirm the prophecy, we cannot see how evidence of a more unquestionable character could be secured.

Concerning Josephus, Dr. Robinson makes the following statement: "Having sketched the progress of the Roman conqueror in his advance to the very gates, and recounted his disposition for the siege, this writer stops short in his narration, in order to lay before his readers a topographical sketch of the city and temple, as they then existed, before the tremendous overthrow to which they were soon subjected. This account is to us invaluable, and could not be supplied from any other

sources."1

It is from the writings of this historian, whose knowledge was so ample and complete, and whose testimony is so free from suspicion, that we shall draw our narrative of the fulfilment of prophecy in the siege of Jerusalem.

1 Biblical Researches, vol. i. p. 409.



CHAPTER IV

The Causes of the War

AND

THE SAFETY OF THE CHRISTIANS.

"When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) then let them which be in Judea flee into the mountains: let him which is on the house-top not come down to take anything out of his house: neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes. And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the Sabbath day." MATT. xxiv. 15-20.

"But there shall not an hair of your head perish. In your patience possess ye your souls. And when ye shall see



Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them which are in Judea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto. For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled." LUKE xxi. 18-22.

The causes of the war which issued in the destruction of Jerusalem had been accumulating for a long time. The pride of the nation was deeply wounded by the presence in Judea and Jerusalem of a Roman governor, attended with a strong military force. They were restive also under the exaction of taxes levied upon them by the Romans. They doubted whether their submission, and their payment of taxes, was not unlawful for them, and whether the assertion of their independence was not a duty. Hence the question, "Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar or not?" The influence of Pilate, who came to Judea as procurator A.D. 26, and continued twelve years, was not calculated to allay their irritation. He was a man of stern temperament, and careless of the peculiar characteristics of the people. By his utter disregard for their religious feelings he gave



much offence, and frequently disturbed the repose of the country.

How the causes for revolt were thus intensified, a few facts may illustrate. When he sent troops to winter at Jerusalem, he caused their ensigns, on which were the idolatrous images of the emperor, to be carried into the city. .This no previous governor had allowed, through fear of exasperating the people, who regarded the presence of such idolatrous symbols as an insult to their religion. The ensigns, being covered, were brought in by night. Being discovered the next day, many of the Jews hastened to Caesarea to entreat Pilate to withdraw them. He kept them waiting five days and nights before his palace. On the sixth he sent for them, when he caused them to be surrounded by soldiers, and threatened them with instant death unless they returned home. Throwing themselves upon the ground, and baring their necks, they declared that they would sooner die than that the idolatrous standards should remain in the holy city, contrary to the law. Pilate, astonished at the firmness and determination of their resolution, and fearing the consequences of a revolt, gave an order for the standards to be



brought back to Caesarea.

On another occasion a great tumult arose when Pilate made a demand upon the sacred treasury of the temple to meet the expenses of an aqueduct to Jerusalem from a fountain twenty miles off. Many of the Jews were then killed by disguised soldiers, who were sent by him among the crowd with daggers and bludgeons concealed under their garments.

When he undertook the consecration of golden bucklers to Tiberius, in the palace of Herod, the Jews were shocked and alarmed. Headed by their magistrates, and accompanied by the four sons of Herod, they entreated him not to persist in a matter so contrary to their law. He was neither influenced by their entreaties, nor by the threats of complaining of him to the emperor.

A quick succession of unjust, tyrannical governors, who aimed at enriching themselves by all practicable means, greatly vexed the people, until it brought them to the very verge of despair. The cruel oppressions and the shameless rapacity of Gessius Florus, the procurator of Judea, kindled into a general blaze the



fire which had long been smouldering. He was appointed by Nero, and was unquestionably the worst Roman governor the Jews ever had. "There were no means at which he scrupled in order to fill his coffers." The robbers committed their depredations with impunity, so long as they gave him a portion. Thus life and property became so insecure that multitudes emigrated to foreign countries. In the year A.D. 66, an edict from the emperor was received at Caesarea, by which the Greek and Syrian inhabitants were placed in the first rank of citizens above the Jews, who had hitherto enjoyed that privilege. This was followed by gross insults from Greeks and Syrians upon the religion of the Jews, producing commotions which were only quelled by the Roman arms. The Jews withdrew their sacred books from the synagogue, and carried them to Narbata, two miles from Caesarea. When several of the principal Jews came to lay their grievances before him, he threw them into prison. This violent act produced a great sensation throughout Judea, and particularly in Jerusalem. At the same time he demanded seventeen talents from the treasury of the temple. This raised a tumult in the city, and strong denunciations were uttered against the governor. Gessius Florus came in person to enforce



his demand, and required that all who had spoken against him should be delivered to him. He would listen to no explanations, and in revenge gave his soldiers permission to plunder the upper market, which was on Mount Zion. They further pillaged many private houses, and slew their inhabitants. Many of the best citizens were scourged and crucified. Next Florus attempted to enter the temple with his soldiers. This the people resisted with such bravery that the Romans were compelled to retire into the royal castle for safety. Having thus kindled the flame of rebellion he withdrew, sending information of the state of affairs to his superior Cestius Gallus, the prefect of Syria.

The war, which lasted five years, began A.D. 66, at Masada, a fortress near the Dead Sea, where a party of Jewish warriors surprised the Roman garrison, and put all the soldiers to the sword. Following this up, the leaders of the nation at Jerusalem openly threw off their allegiance, the priests refused to offer up the usual sacrifices for the prosperity of the emperor, and the popular party slew the Roman garrison. This produced a general insurrection. The Jews on the one side, and the Romans and Syrians on the other, in every town attacked each other with



the greatest fury. The Jews mustered in great numbers, pillaging and devastatiqg the towns chiefly occupied by the Syrians on both sides of the Jordan. The Syrians in revenge massacred the Jews whenever they fell into their hands. Thus the whole country streamed with blood. When Cestius Gallus, the prefect of Syria, heard of this general revolt, he marched with a strong army into Judea. He hastened towards Jerusalem, and surrounding the city, laid siege to it.

We must here glance for a moment at one circumstance which points out the time for the fulfilment of the prophecy of Daniel, uttered more than 500 years before. "After threescore and two weeks," says the prophet, "shall Messiah be cut off, but not for Himself; and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are

determined."1 Of this Christ says, "'vVhen ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not (let him that readeth

understand)."2 "And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed



1 Dan. ix. 26.

2 Mark xiii. 14.

with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh."1 The "abomination of desolation" is a Hebrew expression, signifying "abominable, or hateful destroyer." Where Daniel uses the word abominations, Christ adds the word "desolation," because it was to make Jerusalem utterly desolate. As Luke in this connection speaks of the compassing of Jerusalem with armies, I think it clear that, by the abomination of desolation, the Saviour meant to designate the Roman armies. These were composed of soldiers who were idolaters. They carried in front of their legions ensigns or standards upon which were painted the images of eagles and of their emperors. These, Suetonius informs us, the Romans worshipped; whilst Tacitus calls them "the gods of war." Chrysostom says, "that every idol and every image of a man was by the Jews called an abomination." An illustration is mentioned by Josephus: that "when Vitellius, the governor of Syria, was conducting his army through Judea,



against Aretas, the king of the Arabians, the principal Jews, on account of their strong abhorrence of the ensigns of the soldiers, on which were eagles and the images of the emperors, earnestly entreated him to lead his army some other way, and that he greatly obliged them by complying with their request." In corroboration of the fact that the Romans worshipped these standards, Josephus adds, "that after the city was taken, the Romans brought their ensigns into the temple, and placed them opposite

1 Luke xxi. 20.

the eastern gate, and sacrificed to them in that place." The Roman armies are properly called the abomination of desolation, as desolation marked their advances through all the provinces and nations they had subdued, and as by them the holy city, and its more holy temple, were to be utterly destroyed.

The besieging of Jerusalem by these armies is called the



"standing where it ought not," and "standing in the holy place." The entire city, and all the land for several furlongs around it, was regarded as holy. The Saviour here particularly refers to the surrounding of the city by the armies of Cestius Gallus. They soon obtained full possession of Bezetha, or the new city, and were favourably situated for aggressive movements. Thus it would seem that the Christians, equaIIy with the Jews, were shut up in the city to certain destruction. This, which was the beginning of the days of vengeance, still was to be the signal for the safety of the Christians. They were admonished "to possess their souls in patience," -"not to be troubled or terrified," -"for all these things must first come to pass." They were assured that "not a hair of their head should perish," and that this besieging was the evidence that their deliverance was near. To human vision this was the time of their extremity, but it was the time of God's opportunity. Connected with this siege by Cestius Gallus, we shall have occasion to consider the remarkable providence which demonstrates how certainly God will overrule events so as to accomplish His purposes of mercy toward those who love and trust Him. Josephus states that if Cestius Gallus had assaulted the upper city (Zion), he could easily have taken



it, and ended the war; but he adds, "For the wickedness of the people God suffered not the war to end at that time." For some reason which historians have not explained, Cestius Gallus, instead of following up his victory by a resolute advance, withdrew his troops from the city to their encampment. This strange movement emboldened the Jews; and being animated with the wildest enthusiasm and the intensest hatred, they seized their weapons, and rushed out with such impetuosity and numbers that they compelled the Romans to give way, and betake themselves to flight.

For three days they pursued the retreating army with great slaughter; they got possession of many engines of war, and large supplies. This enabled them to prolong the defence of the city. Agrippa, at the request of Cestius Gallus, sent ambassadors to entreat them to lay down their arms, promising forgiveness for all the past. Elated by their recent success, they rejected with scorn these overtures; they seized the ambassadors, slew one, and wounded the other. Such conduct was in opposition to the earnest counsel of the more respectable citizens, who formed a very powerful body. They



clearly saw that such conduct would exasperate the emperor, and bring against them the whole Roman power. They were not mistaken. The Roman armies, in larger force, soon came, and unrelentingly went on with their work of conquest and ruin.

Flight of the Christians.- Those who forget that God holds in His hands the heart of kings and rulers, and through their instrumentality works out His own designs, are at a loss to account for the retreat of Cestius Gallus, the Roman general. But those who recognize God as the moral governor will understand this strange retreat when the city was ready to surrender. Such will remember that, more than thirty years before, Christ had said to His disciples, " When ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them which are in Judea flee to the mountains."

Before or during the siege the Christians could not safely flee. Had they attempted it they would have been destroyed, either by the Jews within the city or by the Romans without. The only way of escape was for the general to raise the siege. This was done. The armed Jews in great numbers rushed out, and



pursued the retreating army. It was during this time, when the gates were thrown open, that the Christians found their only opportunity for leaving the city and fleeing to a place of safety.

The advice "in patience possess ye your souls," evidently denotes that the Christians were to watch for and seize upon the crisis the moment it should arrive. Also that their flight was to be with great suddenness, and with such haste as to forsake all worldly property. We notice the three specific items in this advice.

(I) All in Judea were to flee to the mountains - Judea was the southern portion of Palestine, including the tribes of Judah, Simeon, Dan, and Benjamin. Jerusalem was a little north of the centre of this territory. This whole region, as well as Jerusalem, would feel the scourge of this war, and all its inhabitants be exposed to its fearful ravages. The mountains to which they were to flee are those of Perea, a mountainous region on the east side of the river Jordan, and considerably north of Jerusalem. This whole territory, including a part of Galilee, was under the government of Agrippa the Younger. As these



countries remained obedient to the Roman power, and took no part in the rebellion, they were consequently not disturbed by the war. This, in itself, was a sufficient reason why the Christians should flee thither. In the midst of these mountains were deep secluded ravines and extensive caves, which would be places of refuge should persecution or other troubles invade this region.

What but Omniscience could thirty years ahead foretell, with such minute accuracy, the scenes of the war, and that the mountainous country would be at peace, whilst all around should be terribly convulsed, and that rapine should rage with horrors unparalleled? What but the faithfulness of a covenant-keeping God would have preserved these mountains in peace, as a covert from the tempest and a shelter from the storm? Who but God would have thus placed His saints on high, and made their defence the munition of rocks?

(2) Their flight 'Was to be too sudden to admit of any delay, and hasty to permit the carrying anything away with them.- "Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take anything out of his house: neither let him which is in the field return back



to take his clothes!"1 Great emphasis is given to this advice when we remember that "the Jewish houses were flat-roofed, and commonly had two stairs, one within and the other without the house, by which they went up to the roof." Thus a continued terrace was formed from one end of the city to the other, and terminating at the gates. Dr. Shaw, in his Travels in the East, says, "The top of the house, which is always flat, is covered with strong plaster; upon these terraces several offices of the family are performed, such as the drying of linen and flax, - the preparing of figs and raisins, - where likewise they enjoy the cool refreshing breeze of the evening, converse with each other, and offer up their devotions. . . . One may pass along the tops of the houses from one end of the city to the other without coming down into the street." The counsel is that if any Christian should be on the housetop when the signal for flight should be given, he must speed his way with all possible dispatch. He must not tarry long enough to go down into the house to take any article, even the most necessary. And if any are in the fields, they must instantly leave the plough in the furrrow, and take the nearest way to the mountains; they must



not go back to take with

70 ad_ the judgement of jerusalem by by william patton

Documents

judgement of jerusalem

destruction of jerusalem

william pattoninstructed

william pattonhttp

william pattonv

holy city

treasury of facts

historyby william patton