6.Three-ply worldHBT for Pindex

by Jacob Feldman

Two questions after 2PW model

1. Mapping between M-world and P-world - how it works?

2. In “Rule of Layers” we have “facts” and “model” and some “cognition process” as well as in 2PW model. Let’s try to fuse these two models in a new one

There are some special P-objects...

M-Objects

P-Objects S-objects

About S-objects

1. Some P-objects work for us (humans) presumably as a “pointers” or “references” to some other objects or group of objects (as signified). We call such P-objects as S-objects (from “sign” or “symbol”)

2. The signified may be ...

a. One P-object - fact or event

b. Group of P-objects - generalizations

c. One M-object - concept or model

d. Group containing M-objects AND P-objects - meanings

Different kind of sinified entities

M-Objects

P-Objects S-objects

Two kinds of S-objects implementationand how they stay connected

individualimplementation

collective implementation

Conglutination

Usually we consider different S-objects with the same signified entity as one S-object - i.e we conglutinate them

After conglutination the same S-object could have different P-implementations

Now we admit the same S-object being implemented both individually and collectively

Flashbacks

Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914)

Signs, Symbols, Semiotics

Karl Raimund Popper (1902-1994)

Three worlds’ model

The problem of universals is solved nowNominalism

Universals are S-objects

Realism

Universals are M-objects

The End