6/21/10 ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for biomass product quality o. french...

26
6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang University, China ESA, Holland, 4th March 2010 Task 100: Database of Ionospheric Scenarios

Upload: brianna-pierce

Post on 03-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality

O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK

J. Chen, Beihang University, China

ESA, Holland, 4th March 2010

Task 100: Database of Ionospheric Scenarios

Page 2: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Overview

1. Limitations of initial strategy2. Modified strategy3. Deliverables

a. database;b. simulation codes;c. technical note 1;

4. Technical issues and scope of software5. Further work6. Effect of orbit local time upon ionospheric scintillation7. Relation of TEC fluctuations to FR8. Use of GPS TEC database

Page 3: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Limitations of Initial Strategy

• Original proposed approach was to generate database of ionospheric phase screens

• Limitations:a. Computationally onerousb. Large data storage requirementsc. Inflexibled. Redundancye. Can only be performed at UoS

Page 4: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Modified Strategy

• To generate a database of the WBMOD output• To provide codes that can run simulations using the above database

• Advantages over previous methodologya. More flexibleb. Reduced data storage requirementsc. Time savingsd. Reduced redundancye. ESA can run on site

Page 5: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Deliverables: Database

• Database entries for the following scenarios:

Parameter Values contained within database Parameter type

Satellite altitude (km) 650 Satellite

Antenna length (m) 20.16 SatelliteOrital inclination (°) 98 SatelliteFrequency (MHz) 435 SatelliteOrbital node type dawn dusk SatelliteLook angle (°) +30 (night) -30 (day) SatellitePlanetary index, Kp 1.0 3.0 7.0 IonosphereCk confidence interval (%) 99.0 Ionosphere

Date 1995 - 2005 inclusive at 10 day intervals

Temporal

Satellite latitude (°) -80 to 80 inclusive SpatialSatellite longitude (°) -180 to 180 inclusive Spatial

Page 6: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Deliverables: Database

• Each entry comprises the WBMOD output for:a. Satellite locations between ±80°N at 1° resolution in

latitude and longitude.b. Fixed equatorial local time throughout a single datec. A specific set of ionospheric and satellite parameters

• See Technical note 1 for full list and definitions of WBMOD parameters.

Page 7: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Gro

und

Latit

ude

Ground Longitude

log1

0 {C

kL}

Global map for 99th percentile of log10 CkL

Night-looking dawn node on 1/1/1995 and Kp = 1

Page 8: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Deliverables: Simulation codes

• Runs simulations of ionospheric phase screens for a particular scenario:

a. Locationb. Timec. Ionospheric conditionsd. Orbit configuration

• Codes draw the WBMOD data required for a given simulation from the database.

• See Technical note 1 for full description of simulation codes and their operation.

Page 9: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Deliverables: Simulation codes

Data outputs: • 2D phase screens • Range autocorrelation• Azimuth autocorrelation• 1D phase slices• Point spread functions• Metrics• Statistics

Phase screen geometry:

Page 10: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Deliverables: Simulation codesLy

(k

m)

Lx (km)

Phase deviation

Page 11: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Deliverables: Simulation codes

Phas

e de

viati

on (r

ad)

Azimuth (km) Azimuth (m)

Nor

mal

ised

PSF

Page 12: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Scope of codes

Run Times• On the University of Sheffield servers, 100 phase slice realisations for a given scenario takes approx. 30 minutes.• This can vary depending on the number of 1D phase slices extracted from each

Limitations• Memory constrains maximum side length of square phase screen to be twice synthetic aperture

Page 13: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

6/21/10

Further Work

Simulation of 1D phase screen• Length of simulation extended at expense of full 2D correlations (ongoing)

Full study of 2D correlation• 2D autocorrelation function given by Rino 1979• Can be calculated from WBMOD output• Extent of decorrelation will dictate retrieval algorithms

Page 14: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

Effect of orbit local time

Locations covered:• Boreal (BO): Sweden• Temperate (TE): Austria• Equatorial (EQ): Borneo

Page 15: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

Effect of orbit local time

Orbital parameters used:• Altitude = 650km;• Inclination = 98°;• Look angle = 30° (night looking);• Frequency = 435 MHz;• Antenna length = 20.16m (Concept 2 of BIOMASS

RfA).

Ionospheric conditions:• date = 21/6/2000, close to solar maximum;• KP = 3 (electron precipitation boundary at

61.2°MagN);• log10CkL percentile = 99%;

Page 16: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

Effect of orbit local time

Satellite node is defined by its local time (LT) as it passes the equator

Orbital nodes considered:o Dawn ascending

• 05:00• 06:00• 07:00

o Dusk descending• 17:00• 18:00• 19:00

Away from equator LT deviates from its equatorial value

Page 17: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

Effect of orbit local time

Local Time

18:00

18:00

06:00

Later Later

Page 18: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

Effect of orbit local time

Boreal location: Sweden (17°E, 65°N)

• High disruption for all nodes; CkL ≈ 1033• Little variation with orbit local time

Ly

(km

)

Lx (km)

One-way phase deviation f

Azimuth distance (m)

Point spread function

06:00

Page 19: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

Effect of orbit local time

Equatorial location: Borneo (115°E, -2°N)

Little disruption to PSF for all dawn nodes, and 17:00 and 18:00 nodes. CkL ≈ 1031

Ly

(km

)

Lx (k m)

One-way phase deviation

Point spread

function

Azimuth distance (m)

18:00

Page 20: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

Effect of orbit local time

Equatorial location: Borneo (115°E, -2°N)

Large disturbance for 19:00 node • post-dusk region → high fluctuations, CkL ≈ 3.6 x

1035

Ly

(km

)

Lx (km)

One-way phase deviation

Azimuth distance (m)

Point spread function

19:00

Page 21: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

Effect of orbit local time

Equatorial location: Borneo (115°E, -2°N)

Satellite is night looking – looking into the region of high ionospheric fluctuation

Effect disappears for the 19:00 orbit when day looking configuration is used

• Looking away from region of high fluctuation

Temperate location: Austria (12.5°E, 47°N)

• Little disruption for all nodes; CkL ≈ 1031• Little variation with orbit local time

Page 22: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

Effect of orbit local time

Summary

General trends as LT moves from night to day:• Increase in mean TEC and FR;• Decrease in ionospheric fluctuations (CkL).

Post sunset equatorial zone:• Pronounced increase in CkL for 19:00 night-looking

node• Can be avoided by using day-looking setup

Boreal zone is a problem under all circumstances.

Page 23: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

TEC fluctutations & FR

Phase fluctuation, φ (rad), is related to TEC (TECU) via

and FR, Ω (rad) to TEC by [1]

Therefore

[1] Belcher, D.P. Theoretical limits on SAR imposed by the ionosphere, IET Radar Sonar Navig., 2, 435-448 (2008)

Page 24: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

TEC fluctutations & FR

For BIOMASS, f = 435 MHz and this reduces to

and for Bm = 3.5 x 10-5 T

Meaning that a phase fluctuation of at least 445° is required to achieve a fluctuation of 1° in FR.

Is this beyond measurement capabilities?

Page 25: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

Use of GPS data

Various sources of GPS TEC data:• Centre for Orbital Determination in Europe (CODE) http://www.aiub.unibe.ch/content/research/gnss/code___research/index_eng.html• International IGSS Service (IGS) - includes CODE http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/

Longitude• -180° to 180° E• 5° resolution

Latitude• -87.5° to 87.5° N• 2.5° resolution

Time• From 1992

onwards• 2 hours

resolution

Page 26: 6/21/10 Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang

Click to edit Master subtitle style

6/21/10

Use of GPS data

Centre for Orbital Determination Europe (CODE) data• Accuracy of ±3.5 TECU

Thorough statistical analysis ongoing