545 north broad st...cdr application form. cdr project application form vacant structure on vacant...

545 NORTH BROAD ST

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA CITY PLANNING COMMISSIONCIVIC DESIGN REVIEWDECEMBER 3rd 2019

DEVELOPER ELK STREET MANAGEMENTARCHITECT CANNO DESIGNATTORNEY BLANK ROME LLPLEED THE SHEWARD PARTNERSHIPSTRUCTURAL O-DONNELL & NACCARATOCIVIL STANTECMEP BALA CONSULTINGACOUSTICS METROPOLITAN ACOUSTICS

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

545 NORTH BROAD ST IS A PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION 9 STORY BUILDING WITH 108 APARTMENT UNITS. TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE IN 152,635 SF. TWO SHARED AMENITY SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED, ONE ON THE SECOND FLOOR AND ANOTHER ON THE NINTH FLOOR. UNDERGROUND PARKING IS BEING PROVIDED FOR 31 SPACES AND 50 CLASS 1A BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED OFF OF THE RESIDENTIAL LOBBY ON THE GROUND FLOOR. AS SHARED ROOF DECK IS BEING PROVIDED AT THE 9TH FLOOR ALONG WITH A MIX OF EXTENSIVE AND SEMI-INTESIVE GREEN ROOF. PROJECT IS SEEKING LEED CERTIFICATION.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CDR APPLICATION FORM 1NEIGHBORHOOD MAP 2ZONING MAP 3EXISTING SITE SURVEY 4EXISTING AERIAL VIEW 5EXISTING STREET VIEWS 6 & 7SITE PLAN & FLOOR PLANS 8-11LANDSCAPE PLAN & MATERIALS 12 & 13BUILDING SECTIONS 14 & 15BUILDING CONTEXT 16BUILDING ELEVATIONS 17 - 20EXTERIOR FACADE & MATERIALS 21 & 23PERSPECTIVE RENDERINGS 24-27COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK 28-35SUSTAINABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE 36 & 37LEED CHECKLIST 38

ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 1 CDR APPLICATION FORM

CDR PROJECT APPLICATION FORM Note: For a project appl icat ion to be considered for a Civic Design Review agenda, complete and accurate submitta ls must be received no later than 4 P.M. on the submission date. A submission does not guarantee placement on the agenda of the next CDR meet ing date.

L&I APPLICATION NUMBER:

What is the trigger causing the project to require CDR Review? Explain briefly.

PROJECT LOCATION

CONTACT INFORMATION

Planning District: Council District:

Address:

Is this parcel within a Master Plan District? Yes No

Applicant Name: Primary Phone:

Email: Address:

Property Owner: Developer

Architect:

L&I APPLICATION NUMBER: 10155551015555

INCLUDES MORE THAN 100,000 SQUARE FEET OF NEW GROSS FLOOR AREA. INCLUDES MORE

THAN 100 NEW DWELLING UNITS.

CENTRAL 5

545 NORTH BROAD STREET

X

ADAM LAVER ESQ. 215.569.5764

[email protected] BLANK ROME LLP. ONE LOGAN SQUARE

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

ELK STREET MANAGEMENT

CANNO DESIGN

SITE CONDITIONS

SITE USES

COMMUNITY MEETING

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT HEARING

Community meeting held: Yes No

If yes, please provide written documentation as proof.

If no, indicate the date and time the community meeting will be held:

Date: November 21, 2019 Time: 6pm

Present Use:

Site Area:

Existing Zoning: Are Zoning Variances required? Yes No

ZBA hearing scheduled: Yes No NA______

If yes, indicate the date hearing will be held:

Date:

17,549 SF

CMX-4 X

VACANT STRUCTURE ON VACANT LOT

X

X

Proposed Use:

Area of Proposed Uses, Broken Out by Program (Include Square Footage and # of Units): COMMERCIAL SPACE: 11,130 SFRESIDENTIAL: 141,505 SF (108 UNITS)

Proposed # of Parking Units: 31

2ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN NEIGHBORHOOD MAP

CALLOWHILL

SPRING GARDEN ST

BRANDYWINE ST

GREEN ST

GREEN ST

BRANDYWINE ST

WALLACE ST

FAIRMOUNT AVE

POPL AR

SPRING GARDEN

BR

OA

D S

T

N 1

5TH

ST

N 13TH

ST

BUS (43)

BUS (43)BROAD STREET LINE

BROAD-RIDGE SPUR

BUS (16)

BUS (61) RIDGE AVE

PROJECTSITE

ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 3

PROJECTSITE

ZONING MAPNEIGHBORHOOD MAP

N

4ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN EXISTING SITE SURVEY

N

ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 5EXISTING SITE SURVEY

A

B

D

C

E

FG

H

EXISTING AERIAL VIEW

6ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN

A BROAD ST LOOKING NORTH-EAST C BROAD ST LOOKING EAST

B GREEN ST LOOKING SOUTH-EAST D VIEW LOOKING WEST

EXISTING STREET VIEWS


E BROAD ST LOOKING SOUTH-EAST G BROAD ST LOOKING NORTH-EAST

F GREEN ST LOOKING SOUTH-WEST H BRANDYWINE ST LOOKING NORTH-WEST

EXISTING STREET VIEWSEXISTING STREET VIEWS

8ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN SITE PLAN

SYMBOL KEY

COMMERCIAL PROGRAM

RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM

LANDSCAPING

NEW TREE

BIKE RACKS

PO

PL

AR

ST

15’-3

0’-15

’

COMMERCIALSPACE

10,800SF

N TANEY ST10’-20’-10’

N 26TH ST12’-26’-12’

TENANT GYMBIKE

STORAGE TENANTSTORAGE

MECHANICAL/UTILITIES

PRIMARY ENTRANCE

LOBBY

SECONDARY LOBBY

MAIL

BIKE RACKS

BIKE RACKS

OUTLINE OF BUILDING ABOVE

(46) BIKES

04

03

02

01

08

07

06

05

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 32 33

36

35

34

48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 38 37

EXISTING TROLLEY

BOLLARDS

51 50 49

PO

PL

AR

ST

15’-3

0’-15

’

COMMERCIALSPACE

10,800SF

N TANEY ST10’-20’-10’

N 26TH ST12’-26’-12’

TENANT GYMBIKE



PRIMARY ENTRANCE

LOBBY

SECONDARY LOBBY

MAIL

BIKE RACKS

BIKE RACKS


(46) BIKES

04

03

02

01

08

07

06

05

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 32 33

36

35

34

48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 38 37

EXISTING TROLLEY

BOLLARDS

51 50 49

PO

PL

AR

ST

15’-3

0’-15

’

COMMERCIALSPACE

10,800SF

N TANEY ST10’-20’-10’

N 26TH ST12’-26’-12’

TENANT GYMBIKE



PRIMARY ENTRANCE

LOBBY

SECONDARY LOBBY

MAIL

BIKE RACKS

BIKE RACKS


(46) BIKES

04

03

02

01

08

07

06

05

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 32 33

36

35

34

48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 38 37

EXISTING TROLLEY

BOLLARDS

51 50 49

PO

PL

AR

ST

15’-3

0’-15

’

COMMERCIALSPACE

10,800SF

N TANEY ST10’-20’-10’

N 26TH ST12’-26’-12’

TENANT GYMBIKE



PRIMARY ENTRANCE

LOBBY

SECONDARY LOBBY

MAIL

BIKE RACKS

BIKE RACKS


(46) BIKES

04

03

02

01

08

07

06

05

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 31 32 33

36

35

34

48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 38 37

EXISTING TROLLEY

BOLLARDS

51 50 49

POPLAR ST15’-30’-15’

CO

MM

ER

CIA

LSP

AC

E10

,80

0SF

N T

AN

EY

ST

10’-2

0’-10

’

N 2

6T

H S

T12

’-2

6’-12

’

TEN

AN

T G

YM

BIK

E ST

OR

AG

ET

ENA

NT

STO

RA

GE

MEC

HA

NIC

AL/

UT

ILIT

IES

PR

IMA

RY

EN

TR

AN

CE

LOB

BY

SEC

ON

DA

RY

LO

BB

Y

MA

IL

BIK

E R

AC

KS

BIK

E

RA

CK

S

OU

TLI

NE

OF

BU

ILD

ING

AB

OV

E

(46

) B

IKE

S

04

03

02 01

08

07

06

05

09

1

0

11

12

13

1

4

15

16

17

18

19

20

2

1

22

23

2

4

25

2

6

27

2

8

29

31

32

3

3

36 35 34

48

47

4

6

45

4

4

43

4

2

41

4

0

3

8

37

EX

IST

ING

T

RO

LLE

Y

BO

LLA

RD

S

51

50

49

0' 10' 25' 75'N

NO

RTH

B

RO

AD S

T

GREEN ST

BRANDYWINE ST

SURFACE PARKING

RODEPH SHALOM

EXISTINGTOWNHOMES

MURAL LOFTSFUTURE DEVELOPMENT

SURFACE PARKING

BENJAMIN FRANKLINHIGH SCHOOL

0' 10' 25' 75'N

NO

RTH

B

RO

AD S

T

GREEN ST

BRANDYWINE ST

SURFACE PARKING

RODEPH SHALOM

EXISTINGTOWNHOMES


SURFACE PARKING


0' 10' 25' 75'N

NO

RTH

B

RO

AD S

T

GREEN ST

BRANDYWINE ST

SURFACE PARKING

RODEPH SHALOM

EXISTINGTOWNHOMES


SURFACE PARKING


0' 10' 25' 75'N

NO

RTH

B

RO

AD S

T

GREEN ST

BRANDYWINE ST

SURFACE PARKING

RODEPH SHALOM

EXISTINGTOWNHOMES


SURFACE PARKING


0' 10' 25' 75'N

NO

RTH

B

RO

AD S

T

GREEN ST

BRANDYWINE ST

SURFACE PARKING

RODEPH SHALOM

EXISTINGTOWNHOMES


SURFACE PARKING


0' 10' 25' 75'N

NO

RTH

B

RO

AD S

TGREEN ST

BRANDYWINE ST

SURFACE PARKING

RODEPH SHALOM

EXISTINGTOWNHOMES


SURFACE PARKING


SYMBOL KEY

COMMERCIAL PROGRAM

RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM

NEW TREES

BIKE RACKS

BSL SUBWAY GRATE


DN

UP

MECH.

STORAGE

RAM

PD

OW

N

MECH.

MECH.

MECH.

01

02 VA

04 E

06

07 C

08 C

12

13

14

15

24

23

22

21

20

18

17

19

25

26

27

28

29 C

09 C

16

30 C

31 C

10

11

05 E

09

0' 10' 25' 75'

BIKE STORAGE(50) BIKES

COMMERCIAL SPACE

11,130 GSF

MAIL/PACKAGE

TRASH

FIRECMD

RAM

PD

OW

N

LOBBY

COVEREDTERRACE

RAM

PD

OW

N

SITE PLAN CELLAR AND FIRST FLOOR PLAN

COMMERCIAL PROGRAM

RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM

NEW TREES

BIKE RACKS

BSL SUBWAY GRATE


UP

DN

SHARED AMMENITY SPACE

GREEN ROOF

0' 10' 25' 75'

SECOND AND TYPCAL FLOOR PLAN

UPDATE


DN

SHARED AMMENITY

SPACE

0' 10' 25' 75'

MECH.

SECOND AND TYPCAL FLOOR PLAN NINTH FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLAN

UPDATE

12ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN LANDSCAPE MATERIALS & PLANTINGS

GREEN ROOF

LOCATION: RoofSEDUM SPECIES: • Sedum spurium ‘Fuldaglut’, ‘John Creech’, ‘Red Carpet’• Sedum kamtschaticum• Sedum takesimensis ‘Golden Carpet’• Sedum acre ‘Gold Moss’ and ‘Aureum’• Sedum floriferum ‘Weihenstephaner Gold’

TREES

LOCATION: SidewalkSPECIES: • Allegheny Serviceberry (Amelanchier laevis)• Malus ‘Sugar Tyme’ - ‘Sugar Tyme’ Crabapple• Acer buergeranum - Trident Maple• Crataegus flava - Yellowleaf Hawthorn• Malus × ‘Harvest Gold’- ’Harvest Gold’ S

Crataegus x lavalleiLavalle Hawthorn

Cornus x rutban –Aurora Dogwood

PLANTER BOXES

LOCATION: 2ND FLOOR CANOPIESSHRUB SPECIES: • Chamaecyparis Pisifera “Gold Thread”• Juniperus Conferta “Blue Pacific”• Spirea Japonica “ Goldflame”

PERENNIALS / ANNUALS: • Calamintha “White Catmint”• Euphorbia “ Diamond Frost”• Mandevilla

Chamaecyparis Obtusa“Nana Gracilis”

Lavandula

GRASSES

LOCATION: Tree PlantersSPECIES: • Sporobolus “Tara”

Hakonechloa “All Gold”

Sedum album ‘Coral Carpet’

HARDSCAPE SURFACES

TREE PITS: • Sidewalk pavers at tree pits

ROOF DECK PAVERS: • ARCHATRAK Porcelain Pedestal Paver Color: Smoke

UPDATE

ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 13LANDSCAPE MATERIALS & PLANTINGS LANDSCAPE PLAN

GREEN ROOF

MECHANICAL

STREET TREES PLANTERS

PLANTER BOXES AT 2ND FLOOR CANOPIES

SEATING AT ROOFDECK

ROOF PAVERS

2ND FLOOR GREEN ROOF

TPO ROOF


PARKINGGREEN ST. BRANDYWINE ST.

65' - 0 7/8" 55' - 1"

149' - 8 1/2"

96' -

6"

29' - 6 5/8"

COMMERCIAL SPACETRASHBIKESTORAGE

85' -

2"

B

A

N

BUILDING SECTIONS

A BUILDING SECTION (NORTH-SOUTH)

BUILDING SECTION KEY

ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 15BUILDING SECTIONS

B BUILDING SECTION (EAST-WEST)

BUILDING SECTIONS

PARKING

COMMERCIAL SPACE

TENANT STORAGE

TENANT STORAGE

TENANT STORAGE

TENANT STORAGE

TENANT STORAGE

TENANT STORAGE

TENANT STORAGE

SHARED AMMENITY

SPACE

MECH.

96' -

6"

126' - 8"

85' -

2"

BUIL

DIN

G H

EIG

HT

BROAD ST.

B BUILDING SECTION (EAST-WEST)

16ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN BUILDING CONTEXT

PACKARD BUILDING - ALBERT KAHN (1911)

PMA COLUMNS - JULIAN ABELE (1928)

325 N BROAD

631 N BROAD - CANNO DESIGN (2018)


A BROAD ST ELEVATION (WEST)

BUILDING SECTION KEY

CURVED CORRUGATED METAL PANEL DETAIL

FLAT CORRUGATED METAL PANEL

CUSTOM PROFILE GRAY CAST STONE

BUILDING ELEVATIONSBUILDING CONTEXT


B GREEN ST ELEVATION (NORTH)

BUILDING ELEVATIONS


GRAY EIFS PANEL

C BRANDYWINE ST ELEVATION (SOUTH)

BUILDING ELEVATIONS


D EAST ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATIONS

ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 21 EXTERIOR FACADE CLOSE UP & AXONOMETRIC SECTION CUT


4

3

1

4' - 2"4' - 11 3/4"

1' - 2" 1' - 2"2' - 7 5/8" 1' - 2" 1' - 10" 1' - 2"

2' -

0"1'

-7 1

/4",

TYP.

TYP.1' - 7 7/8",

1' -

10"

21' -

8 1

/2"

26' - 5"

2

3' -

4"4"

1' - 7"1' - 0" 7"

1' -

2"1'

- 10

"4'

- 2"

HO

LD1'

- 2"

1' -

10"

HO

LD1'

- 2"

8"7"

4' -

2"

HO

LD1'

- 2"

EQ.

EQ.

HO

LD1'

- 2"

7"8"

8"

4' -

2"

1' -

2"1'

- 10

"1'

- 2"

1' - 7"

BUILDING DETAILS

PARTIAL ELEVATION DETAIL 3 AT STONE COLUMN

DETAIL 1 AT CORNICE

DETAIL 4 AT STONE COLUMN

DETAIL 2 AT METAL COLUMN

ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 23 EXTERIOR FACADE MATERIALS

DETAIL 4 AT STONE COLUMN

DETAIL 2 AT METAL COLUMN

D CORRUGATED METAL PANEL SIDING

A GREY CAST STONE FACADE B GRAY EXTERIOR WINDOWS C PLANTER BOXES AT SETBACK AND CANOPIES

F EIFS PANEL LOCATION: REAR FACADES

G CONCRETE SEATING BLOCKS H SIDEWALK BIKE RACKS

24ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN PERSPECTIVE RENDERING

AERIAL VIEW

ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 25PERSPECTIVE RENDERING PERSPECTIVE RENDERING

VIEW FROM BROAD ST & GREEN ST.


VIEW FROM BROAD ST & BRANDYWINE ST

PERSPECTIVE RENDERING

ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 27PERSPECTIVE RENDERING

VIEW OF GREEN ST. ENTRANCE

PERSPECTIVE RENDERING


COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission

INSTRUCTIONS This Checklist is an implementation tool of the Philadelphia Complete Streets Handbook (the “Handbook”) and enables City engineers and planners to review projects for their compliance with the Handbook’s policies. The handbook provides design guidance and does not supersede or replace language, standards or policies established in the City Code, City Plan, or Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

The Philadelphia City Planning Commission receives this Checklist as a function of its Civic Design Review (CDR) process. This checklist is used to document how project applicants considered and accommodated the needs of all users of city streets and sidewalks during the planning and/or design of projects affecting public rights-of-way. Departmental reviewers will use this checklist to confirm that submitted designs incorporate complete streets considerations (see §11-901 of The Philadelphia Code). Applicants for projects that require Civic Design Review shall complete this checklist and attach it to plans submitted to the Philadelphia City Planning Commission for review, along with an electronic version.

The Handbook and the checklist can be accessed at http://www.phila.gov/CityPlanning/projectreviews/Pages/CivicDesignReview.aspx

PRELIMINARY PCPC REVIEW AND COMMENT: DATE

FINAL STREETS DEPT REVIEW AND COMMENT: DATE

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST

•

o

o

o

o

o

•

o

o

o

o

o

*

EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, should be at an identified standard engineering scale

FULLY DIMENSIONED

CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS/LAYBY LANES

TREE PITS/LANDSCAPING

BICYCLE RACKS/STATIONS/STORAGE AREAS

TRANSIT SHELTERS/STAIRWAYS

PROPOSED CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, should be at an identified standard engineering scale

FULLY DIMENSIONED, INCLUDING DELINEATION OF WALKING, FURNISHING, AND BUILDING ZONES AND PINCH POINTS

PROPOSED CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS/LAYBY LANES

PROPOSED TREE PITS/LANDSCAPING

BICYCLE RACKS/STATIONS/STORAGE AREAS

TRANSIT SHELTERS/STAIRWAYS

APPLICANTS PLEASE NOTE: ONLY FULL-SIZE, READABLE SITE PLANS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ADDITIONAL PLANS MAY BE REQUIRED AND WILL BE REQUESTED IF NECESSARY


INSTRUCTIONS (continued) APPLICANTS SHOULD MAKE SURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:

This checklist is designed to be filled out electronically in Microsoft Word format. Please submit the Word version of the checklist. Text fields will expand automatically as you type.

All plans submitted for review must clearly dimension the widths of the Furnishing, Walking, and Building Zones (as defined in Section 1 of the Handbook). “High Priority” Complete Streets treatments (identified in Table 1 and subsequent sections of the Handbook) should be identified and dimensioned on plans.

All plans submitted for review must clearly identify and site all street furniture, including but not limited to bus shelters, street signs and hydrants.

Any project that calls for the development and installation of medians, bio-swales and other such features in the right-of-way may require a maintenance agreement with the Streets Department.

ADA curb-ramp designs must be submitted to Streets Department for review

Any project that significantly changes the curb line may require a City Plan Action. The City Plan Action Application is available at http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/survey-and-design-bureau/city-plans-unit . An application to the Streets Department for a City Plan Action is required when a project plan proposes the:

o Placing of a new street;o Removal of an existing street;o Changes to roadway grades, curb lines, or widths; oro Placing or striking a city utility right-of-way.

Complete Streets Review Submission Requirement*:

ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 29COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST


GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION 1. PROJECT NAME

545 N Broad St

2. DATE

11/19/2019

3. APPLICANT NAME

Adam E. Levar

4. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION

Blank Rome

130 N 18th St215-569-5764

[email protected]

5. PROJECT AREA: list precise street limitsand scope

Interior to the property of 545 NorthBroad Street as generally bounded by Green Street (north), Broad Street (west), Brandywine Street (south), and private property (east)

Vehicular access is to be provided from Brandywine Street to the southeast corner of the site. Pedestrian access will be provided along Green, Broad, and Brandywine Streets.

6. OWNER NAME

545NB QOZB LLC

7. OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION

1010 North Hancock Street, Philadelphia, PA 19123

8. ENGINEER / ARCHITECT NAME

Ted Mullen, Stantec Consulting Services Inc.

9. ENGINEER / ARCHITECT CONTACT INFORMATION

1500 Spring Garden Street, Suite 1100, Philadelphia, PA 19130

215-665-7005

[email protected]

10. STREETS: List the streets associated with the project. Complete Streets Types can be found at www.phila.gov/mapunder the “Complete Street Types” field. Complete Streets Types are also identified in Section 3 of the Handbook.

Also available here: http://metadata.phila.gov/#home/datasetdetails/5543867320583086178c4f34/STREET FROM TO COMPLETE STREET TYPE

Broad Street

Green Street

Brandywine Street

Green Street

Broad Street

Broad Street

Brandywine Street

13th Street

13th Street

Civic/Ceremonial

Local

Local

11. Does the Existing Conditions site survey clearly identify the following existing conditions with dimensions?

a. Parking and loading regulations in curb lanes adjacent to the site YES NO

b. Street Furniture such as bus shelters, honor boxes, etc. YES NO N/A

c. Street Direction YES NO

d. Curb Cuts YES NO N/A

e. Utilities, including tree grates, vault covers, manholes, junctionboxes, signs, lights, poles, etc.

YES NO N/A

f. Building Extensions into the sidewalk, such as stairs and stoops YES NO N/A


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

APPLICANT

Additional Explanation / Comments:

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW

Additional Reviewer Comments:

30ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST


PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.3) 12. SIDEWALK: list Sidewalk widths for each street frontage. Required Sidewalk widths are listed in Section 4.3 of the

Handbook.STREET FRONTAGE TYPICAL SIDEWALK WIDTH

(BUILDING LINE TO CURB) Required / Existing / Proposed

CITY PLAN SIDEWALK WIDTH Existing / Proposed

Broad Street from Green Street to Brandywine Street

22’ / 22’ / 22’ 22’ / 22’

Green Street from Broad Street to 13th Street 12’ / 12’ / 12’ 12’ / 12’

Brandywine Street from Broad Street to 13th Street

10’ / 10’ / 10’ 10’ / 10’

13. WALKING ZONE: list Walking Zone widths for each street frontage. The Walking Zone is defined in Section 4.3 of theHandbook, including required widths.

STREET FRONTAGE WALKING ZONE Required / Existing / Proposed

Broad Street from Green Street to Brandywine Street

10’ / 12’ (SEPTA grates) / 12’ (SEPTA Grates)

Green Street from Broad Street to 13th Street 6' /10.5’ (Utility Poles) / 8’

Brandywine Street from Broad Street to 13th Street

5' /8.5’ (Utility Poles) / 6’

14. VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS: list Vehicular Intrusions into the sidewalk. Examples include but are not limited to;driveways, lay-by lanes, etc. Driveways and lay-by lanes are addressed in sections 4.8.1 and 4.6.3, respectively, of theHandbook.

EXISTING VEHICULAR INTRUSIONSINTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT

Curb Cut 25.7’ SCL of Green Street, ~110 LF east of the ECL of Broad Street

Curb Cut 24.8’ SCL of Green Street, ~42 LF east of the ECL of Broad Street

Curb Cut 32.4’ ECL of Broad Street, ~60 LF north of NCL of Brandywine Street

PROPOSED VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT

Curb Cut 24’ NCL of Brandywine Street, ~85 LF east of the ECL of Broad Street

Curb Cut 16’ NCL of Green Street, ~135 LF east of the ECL of Broad Street


ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 31COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST


PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (continued) DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

15. When considering the overall design, does it create or enhance apedestrian environment that provides safe and comfortable access forall pedestrians at all times of the day?

YES NO YES NO

APPLICANT: Pedestrian Component

Additional Explanation / Comments: The proposed project integrates into an existing pedestrian network from the surrounding community. This includes a wide, well-lit walking zone along the Broad Street frontage, as well as a dense furnishing zone along Brandywine and Green Streets to buffer parked and moving vehicular traffic from the walking zone along those corridors.

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Pedestrian Component

Reviewer Comments:


BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.4) 16. BUILDING ZONE: list the MAXIMUM, existing and proposed Building Zone width on each street frontage. The Building

Zone is defined as the area of the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the building face, wall, or fence marking theproperty line, or a lawn in lower density residential neighborhoods. The Building Zone is further defined in section4.4.1 of the Handbook.

STREET FRONTAGE MAXIMUM BUILDING ZONE WIDTH Existing / Proposed

Broad Street from Green Street to Brandywine Street 0’ / 0’

Green Street from Broad Street to 13th Street 0' / 3.5’ (PECO structure)

Brandywine Street from Broad Street to 13th Street 0' / 0’

17. FURNISHING ZONE: list the MINIMUM, recommended, existing, and proposed Furnishing Zone widths on each streetfrontage. The Furnishing Zone is further defined in section 4.4.2 of the Handbook.

STREET FRONTAGE MINIMUM FURNISHING ZONE WIDTH Recommended / Existing / Proposed

Broad Street from Green Street to Brandywine Street 5’ / 8’ (SEPTA Grates) / 8’

Green Street from Broad Street to 13th Street 3.5' / 1.5’ (Utility Poles) / 4’

Brandywine Street from Broad Street to 13th Street 3.5’ / 1.5’ (Utility Poles) / 4’

18. Identify proposed “high priority” building and furnishing zone design treatments that areincorporated into the design plan, where width permits (see Handbook Table 1). Are thefollowing treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?

DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

Bicycle Parking YES NO N/A YES NO Lighting YES NO N/A YES NO Benches YES NO N/A YES NO Street Trees YES NO N/A YES NO Street Furniture YES NO N/A YES NO

19. Does the design avoid tripping hazards? YES NO N/A YES NO

20. Does the design avoid pinch points? Pinch points are locations wherethe Walking Zone width is less than the required width identified in item 13, or requires an exception

YES NO N/A YES NO




BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (continued)

APPLICANT: Building & Furnishing Component

Additional Explanation / Comments: The proposed development does not change the building or furnishing zone for the property.

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Building & Furnishing Component

Reviewer Comments:

21. Do street trees and/or plants comply with street installationrequirements (see sections 4.4.7 & 4.4.8)

YES NO N/A YES NO

22. Does the design maintain adequate visibility for all roadway users atintersections?

YES NO N/A YES NO


BICYCLE COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.5) 23. List elements of the project that incorporate recommendations of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, located online at

http://phila2035.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/bikePedfinal2.pdf

24. List the existing and proposed number of bicycle parking spaces, on- and off-street. Bicycle parking requirements areprovided in The Philadelphia Code, Section 14-804.

BUILDING / ADDRESS REQUIRED SPACES

ON-STREET Existing / Proposed

ON SIDEWALK Existing / Proposed

OFF-STREET Existing / Proposed

545 N. Broad Street 37 0 / 0 0 / 32 0 / 50

25. Identify proposed “high priority” bicycle design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that areincorporated into the design plan, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority”elements identified and dimensioned on the plan?


Conventional Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO Buffered Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO Bicycle-Friendly Street Indego Bicycle Share Station

YES NO N/A YES NO N/A

YES NO YES NO

26. Does the design provide bicycle connections to local bicycle, trail, andtransit networks?

YES NO N/A YES NO

27. Does the design provide convenient bicycle connections to residences,work places, and other destinations?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Bicycle Component

Additional Explanation / Comments: Property is not adjacent to any protected bicycle infrastructure, buffered infrastructure, or “sharrows.”

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Bicycle Component

Reviewer Comments:


ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 33 COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST


CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.6) DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

28. Does the design limit conflict among transportation modes along thecurb?

YES NO YES NO

29. Does the design connect transit stops to the surrounding pedestriannetwork and destinations?

YES NO N/A YES NO

30. Does the design provide a buffer between the roadway and pedestriantraffic?

YES NO N/A YES NO

31. How does the proposed plan affect the accessibility, visibility, connectivity, and/or attractivenessof public transit?

The proposed plan will include commercial and residential uses and therefore elevate the pedestrian activity and environment along this block of Broad Street. As such, the currently “uninviting” pedestrian atmosphere will be augmented with new sidewalks, lighting, furnishings, etc. in addition to the increase in non-vehicular site activity, and will create a much more safe and inviting environment within the proximity to the Spring Garden Broad Street Line station.

YES NO

APPLICANT: Curbside Management Component

Additional Explanation / Comments: The proposed design eliminates the driveway entrance along Broad Street, eliminating pedestrian, cross-traffic, and vehicle queuing conflicts along this frontage.

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Curbside Management Component

Reviewer Comments:


VEHICLE / CARTWAY COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.7) 32. If lane changes are proposed, , identify existing and proposed lane widths and the design speed for each street

frontage;STREET FROM TO LANE WIDTHS

Existing / Proposed DESIGN SPEED

/

/

/

/


33. What is the maximum AASHTO design vehicle being accommodatedby the design?

SU-30 (loading dock)

Passenger car (garage entrance)

YES NO

34. Will the project affect a historically certified street? An inventory ofhistoric streets(1) is maintained by the Philadelphia HistoricalCommission.

YES NO YES NO

35. Will the public right-of-way be used for loading and unloadingactivities?

YES NO YES NO

36. Does the design maintain emergency vehicle access? YES NO YES NO

37. Where new streets are being developed, does the design connect andextend the street grid?

YES NO N/A YES NO

38. Does the design support multiple alternative routes to and fromdestinations as well as within the site?

YES NO N/A YES NO

39. Overall, does the design balance vehicle mobility with the mobility andaccess of all other roadway users?

YES NO YES NO

APPLICANT: Vehicle / Cartway Component

Additional Explanation / Comments: It is anticipated that vehicular traffic at the site will be reduced due to a combination of factors. Namely, the existing use of the site is a motor vehicle retail and repair center, and with the change in use vehicular traffic should reduce. Additionally, vehicle entrances to the site have been reduce and separated into garage access and loading dock uses.

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Vehicle / Cartway Component

Reviewer Comments:

(1) http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/images/uploads/documents/Historical_Street_Paving.pdf




URBAN DESIGN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.8) DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

40. Does the design incorporate windows, storefronts, and other activeuses facing the street?

YES NO N/A YES NO

41. Does the design provide driveway access that safely managespedestrian / bicycle conflicts with vehicles (see Section 4.8.1)?

YES NO N/A YES NO

42. Does the design provide direct, safe, and accessible connectionsbetween transit stops/stations and building access points anddestinations within the site?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Urban Design Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Urban Design Component

Reviewer Comments:


INTERSECTIONS & CROSSINGS COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.9) 43. If signal cycle changes are proposed, please identify Existing and Proposed Signal Cycle lengths; if not, go to question

No. 48.SIGNAL LOCATION EXISTING

CYCLE LENGTH PROPOSED CYCLE LENGTH


44. Does the design minimize the signal cycle length to reduce pedestrian wait time?

YES NO N/A YES NO

45. Does the design provide adequate clearance time for pedestrians to cross streets?

YES NO N/A YES NO

46. Does the design minimize pedestrian crossing distances by narrowing streets or travel lanes, extending curbs, reducing curb radii, or usingmedians or refuge islands to break up long crossings?

If yes, City Plan Action may be required.

YES NO N/A YES NO

47. Identify “High Priority” intersection and crossing design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) thatwill be incorporated into the design, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority” design treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?

YES NO

Marked Crosswalks YES NO N/A YES NO Pedestrian Refuge Islands YES NO N/A YES NO Signal Timing and Operation YES NO N/A YES NO Bike Boxes YES NO N/A YES NO

48. Does the design reduce vehicle speeds and increase visibility for allmodes at intersections?

YES NO N/A YES NO

49. Overall, do intersection designs limit conflicts between all modes andpromote pedestrian and bicycle safety?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Intersections & Crossings Component

Additional Explanation / Comments: The proposed design does not include improvements for the adjacent intersection.

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Intersections & Crossings Component

Reviewer Comments:


ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 35 COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

APPLICANT


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW

Additional Reviewer Comments:


36ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN SUSTAINABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE

Civic Sustainable Design Checklist – Updated September 3, 2019

Civic Design Review Sustainable Design Checklist Sustainable design represents important city-wide concerns about environmental conservation and energy use. Development teams should try to integrate elements that meet many goals, including:

· Reuse of existing building stock· Incorporation of existing on-site natural habitats and landscape elements· Inclusion of high-performing stormwater control· Site and building massing to maximize daylight and reduce shading on adjacent sites· Reduction of energy use and the production of greenhouse gases· Promotion of reasonable access to transportation alternatives

The Sustainable Design Checklist asks for responses to specific benchmarks. These metrics go above and beyond the minimum requirements in the Zoning and Building codes. All benchmarks are based on adaptions from Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) v4 unless otherwise noted.

Categories Benchmark Does project meet benchmark? If yes, please explain how. If no, please explain why not.

Location and Transportation

(1) Access to Quality Transit

Locate a functional entry of the project within a ¼-mile (400-meter) walking distance of existing or planned bus, streetcar, or rideshare stops, bus rapid transit stops, light or heavy rail stations.

(2) Reduced Parking Footprint

All new parking areas will be in the rear yard of the property or under the building, and unenclosed or uncovered parking areas are 40% or less of the site area.

(3) Green Vehicles

Designate 5% of all parking spaces used by the project as preferred parking for green vehicles or car share vehicles. Clearly identify and enforce for sole use by car share or green vehicles, which include plug-in electric vehicles and alternative fuel vehicles.

(4) Railway Setbacks(Excluding frontages facingtrolleys/light rail or enclosedsubsurface rail lines or subways)

To foster safety and maintain a quality of life protected from excessive noise and vibration, residential development with railway frontages should be setback from rail lines and the building’s exterior envelope, including windows, should reduce exterior sound transmission to 60dBA. (If setback used, specify distance)i

(5) Bike Share StationIncorporate a bike share station in coordination with and conformance to the standards of Philadelphia Bike Share.

Yes, main entry is located within 1/4 mile walking distance of the Broad Street Subway line and multiple bus routes: 16, 43, 61, and 2.

Completed Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Yes, 100% of new parking will be located under the building in an underground parking garage.

Yes, 6% of parking spaces will be reserved for green vehicles. There will be two spaces reserved for plug-in electric vehicle charging.

No, not applicable. There are no railways adjacent to project site. Per "category" note, benchmark does not apply to enclosed subsurface subways.

Yes, team is investigating feasibility of locating an Indego bike share station on or near site. There is currently an existing bike share station across the street from the project at the Spring Garden Broad Street Subway Station.


Water Efficiency

(6) Outdoor Water Use

Maintain on-site vegetation without irrigation. OR, Reduce of watering requirements at least 50% from the calculated baseline for the site's peak watering month.

Sustainable Sites

(7) Pervious Site Surfaces

Provides vegetated and/or pervious open space that is 30% or greater of the site's Open Area, as defined by the zoning code. Vegetated and/or green roofs can be included in this calculation.

(8) Rainwater Management

Conform to the stormwater requirements of the Philadelphia Water Department(PWD) and either: A) Develop a green street and donate it to PWD, designed and constructed in accordance with the PWD Green Streets Design Manual, OR B) Manage additional runoff from adjacent streets on the development site, designed and constructed in accordance with specifications of the PWD Stormwater Management Regulations

(9) Heat Island Reduction(excluding roofs)

Reduce the heat island effect through either of the following strategies for 50% or more of all on-site hardscapes: A) Hardscapes that have a highreflectance, an SRI>29. B) Shading bytrees, structures, or solar panels.

Energy and Atmosphere

(10) Energy Commissioning andEnergy Performance - Adherenceto the New Building Code

PCPC notes that as of April 1, 2019 new energy conservation standards are required in the Philadelphia Building Code, based on recent updates of the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) and the option to use ASHRAE 90.01-2016. PCPC staff asks the applicant to state which path they are taking for compliance, including their choice of code and any options being pursued under the 2018 IECC.ii

(11) Energy Commissioning andEnergy Performance - Goingbeyond the code

Will the project pursue energy performance measures beyond what is required in the Philadelphia code by meeting any of these benchmarks? iii

Reduce energy consumption by achieving 10% energy savings or more from an established baseline using

Yes, team is investigating feasibility of rainwater reuse system to reduce potable water use in irrigation by 100%. There will be small areas of vegetated roofing that will require irrigation.

Yes, per zoning code, site is zoned CMX-4 which permits 100% maxoccupied area and does not requireopen space. 54% of LEED ProjectBoundary shall be open space, includingaccessible and inaccessible green roof.

Yes, project shall confirm to the PWD stormwater requirements. Team is investigating feasibility of PWD Green Streets or Green Inlet program.

Yes, project shall include a combination of strategies, including vegetated roofing, light-colored roofing, and light-colored paving.

Yes, project shall meet new energy conservation and energy code standards by demonstrating compliance through the prescriptive path.

No. Project shall demonstrate optimized energy performance per LEED BD+C v4 requirements by comparing the Proposed design to an ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010 Baseline. We are not pursuing the noted LEED v4.1 metric.

ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN 37SUSTAINABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE SUSTAINABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE


ASHRAE standard 90.1-2016 (LEED v4.1 metric). Achieve certification in Energy Star for Multifamily New Construction (MFNC).

Achieve Passive House Certification

(12) Indoor Air Quality andTransportation

Any sites within 1000 feet of an interstate highway, state highway, or freeway will provide air filters for all regularly occupied spaces that have a Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) of 13. Filters shall be installed prior to occupancy.iv

(13) On-Site Renewable EnergyProduce renewable energy on-site that will provide at least 3% of the project's anticipated energy usage.

Innovation

(14) Innovation Any other sustainable measures that could positively impact the public realm.

i Railway Association of Canada (RAC)'s “Guidelines for New Development in Proximity to Railway Operations. Exterior Sound transmission standard from LEED v4, BD+C, Acoustic Performance Credit.

ii Title 4 The Philadelphia Building Construction and Occupancy Code See also, “The Commercial Energy Code Compliance” information sheet: https://www.phila.gov/li/Documents/Commercial%20Energy%20Code%20Compliance%20Fact%20Sheet--Final.pdf and the “What Code Do I Use” information sheet: https://www.phila.gov/li/Documents/What%20Code%20Do%20I%20Use.pdf

iii LEED 4.1, Optimize Energy Performance in LEED v4.1 For Energy Star: www.Energystar.gov For Passive House, see www.phius.org

iv Section 99.04.504.6 "Filters" of the City of Los Angeles Municipal Code, from a 2016 Los Angeles Ordinance requiring enhanced air filters in homes near freeways

No, not applicable. Project site is not located within 1,000 feet of an interstate highway. Even though, project shall be equipped with MERV 13 filtration media for improved indoor air quality.

No, renewable energy is not being pursued.

Yes, project is pursuing formal certification under the LEED BD+C v4 New Construction Rating System.

38ELK STREET MANAGEMENT | CANNO DESIGN LEED CHECKLIST

LEED BD+C: New Construction v4 Checklist

545 North Broad StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19123

Credit Status Credit Description Collaborating PartyAw

arde

d

Prob

able

? No0 55 22 28 Required

Y D Form 1 Project Information Required The Sheward Partnership

0 0 0 1 1 point

1 D Credit 1 1

0 15 1 0 16 points

- D Credit 1 1 to 161 D Credit 2 1 The Sheward Partnership2 D Credit 3 1 to 2 The Sheward Partnership Elk Street Management

Option 1: Historic District 1Option 2: Priority Designation 1Option 3: Brownfield Remediation 2

5 D Credit 4 1 to 5 The Sheward Partnership5 D Credit 5 1 to 5 The Sheward Partnership

1 D Credit 6 1 The Sheward Partnership ●1 D Credit 7 1 The Sheward Partnership1 D Credit 8 1 The Sheward Partnership

0 4 1 5 10 points

Y C Prereq 1 Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Required Stantec1 D Credit 1 1 The Sheward Partnership Stantec

2 D Credit 2 1 to 21 D Credit 3 1 The Sheward Partnership Roof Meadows

3 D Credit 4 1 to 32 D Credit 5 1 to 2 The Sheward Partnership Canno Design

Option 1: Non-Roof and Roof 2Option 2: Parking Under Cover 1

1 D Credit 6 1 The Sheward Partnership Bala

0 6 1 4 11 points

Y D Prereq 1 Outdoor Water Use Reduction Required The Sheward Partnership Roof MeadowsY D Prereq 2 Required The Sheward Partnership BalaY D Prereq 3 Required The Sheward Partnership Elk Street Management2 D Credit 1 1 to 2 The Sheward Partnership

1100% Reduction from Baseline 2 ●

4 2 D Credit 2 1 to 6 The Sheward Partnership25% Reduction 130% Reduction 2

340% Reduction 445-50% Reduction 5 to 6

2 D Credit 3 1 to 21 D Credit 4 1 The Sheward Partnership Bala ●

0 7 11 15 33 points

Y C Prereq 1 Fundamental Commissioning & Verification Required Commissioning Authority ●Y D Prereq 2 Minimum Energy Performance Required The Sheward Partnership Canno Design / Bala ●Y D Prereq 3 Building-Level Energy Metering Required The Sheward Partnership Elk Street ManagementY D Prereq 4 Fundamental Refrigerant Management Required The Sheward Partnership

6 C Credit 1 Enhanced Commissioning 2 to 6 Commissioning Authority ●Option 1, Path 1: Enhanced Commissioning 3Option 1, Path 2: Monitoring-Based Commissioning 4Option 2: Envelope Commissioning 2

6 2 10 D Credit 2 1 to 18 The Sheward Partnership6% Reduction (New Construction) 18% Reduction 210% Reduction 312% Reduction 414% Reduction 516% Reduction 618% Reduction 720% Reduction 822-46% Reduction 9 to 17

1 D Credit 3 Advanced Energy Metering 1 Bala The Sheward Partnership2 C Credit 4 Demand Response 1 to 23 D Credit 5 Renewable Energy Production 1 to 3

1 D Credit 6 Enhanced Refrigerant Management 12 C Credit 7 Green Power & Carbon Offsets 1 to 2 The Sheward Partnership Elk Street Management ●

Optimize Energy Performance

Water Efficiency

Indoor Water Use ReductionBuilding-Level Water MeteringOutdoor Water Use Reduction50% Reduction From Baseline

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Water Metering

Energy & Atmosphere

Cooling Tower & Process Water Use (v4.1)

Credit Type

Credit ID

Integrative Process

Project Information

November 12, 2019

Soft Cost

Hard Cost

High-Priority Site

Integrative Process

Location and Transportation

LEED for Neighborhood Development LocationSensitive Land Protection

Responsible Party for LEED-Online Documentation

Sustainable Sites

Site Assessment

35% Reduction

Surrounding Density & Diverse UsesAccess to Quality TransitBicycle FacilitiesReduced Parking Footprint (v4.1)Electric Vehicles (v4.1)

Site Development, Protect or Restore Habitat (v4.1) Open SpaceRainwater Management (v4.1)Heat Island Reduction

Light Pollution Reduction

Credit Status Credit Description Collaborating Party

Awar

ded

Prob

able

? No0 5 3 5 13 points

Y D Prereq 1 Storage & Collection of Recyclables Required The Sheward Partnership Elk Street ManagementY C Prereq 2 Construction & Demolition Waste Management Planning Required The Sheward Partnership General Contractor

3 2 D Credit 1 Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction (v4.1) 1 to 5 The Sheward PartnershipOption 1: Historic Building Reuse 5Option 2: Renovation of Abandoned or Blighted Building 5Option 3: Building or Material Reuse 1 to 4Option 4: Whole Building Life-Cycle Assessment 3 ●

1 1 C Credit 2 BPDO, Environmental Product Declarations (v4.1) 1 to 2 The Sheward Partnership Canno DesignOption 1: Environmental Product Declarations 1Option 2: Multi-Attribute Optimization 1

1 1 C Credit 3 BPDO, Sourcing of Raw Materials (v4.1) 1 to 2 The Sheward Partnership Canno Design20% Responsible Sourcing of Raw Materials 140% Responsible Sourcing of Raw Materials 1

1 1 C Credit 4 BPDO, Material Ingredients (v4.1) 1 to 2 The Sheward Partnership Canno DesignOption 1: Material Ingredient Reporting 1Option 2: Material Ingredient Optimization 1

2 C Credit 5 Construction & Demolition Waste Management (v4.1) 1 to 2 The Sheward Partnership General ContractorOption 1, Path 1: Divert 50% and Three Material Streams 1Option 1, Path 2: Divert 75% and Four Material Streams 2

0 9 4 3 16 points

Y D Prereq 1 Minimum IAQ Performance Required BalaY D Prereq 2 Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control Required The Sheward Partnership Elk Street Management2 D Credit 1 Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies 1 to 2 The Sheward Partnership Bala

Option 1: Enhanced IAQ Strategies 1Option 2: Additional Enhanced IAQ Strategies 1

3 C Credit 2 Low-Emitting Materials (v4.1): 4 Categories for 3 points 1 to 3 The Sheward Partnership Canno DesignPaints & CoatingsAdhesives & SealantsFlooringComposite WoodCeilingsWalls Insulation Furniture

1 C Credit 3 Construction IAQ Management Plan 1 The Sheward Partnership General Contractor2 C Credit 4 Indoor Air Quality Assessment 1 to 2 The Sheward Partnership ●

1 D Credit 5 Thermal Comfort 1 Bala1 1 D Credit 6 Interior Lighting 1 to 2 The Sheward Partnership

3 D Credit 7 Daylight (v4.1) 1 to 31 D Credit 8 Quality Views 1 The Sheward Partnership

1 D Credit 9 Acoustic Performance 1 Metropolitan Acoustics

0 6 0 0 6 points

1 D Credit 1.1 Exemplary Performance, Heat Island Reduction 1 The Sheward Partnership1 C Credit 1.2 Innovation, Education & Outreach Program 1 The Sheward Partnership Canno Design1 D Credit 1.3 Innovation, Walkable Project Site 1 The Sheward Partnership1 D Credit 1.4 Innovation, WELL Features 1 The Sheward Partnership1 C Credit 1.5 Pilot Credit, Integrative Analysis of Building Materials 1 The Sheward Partnership1 C Credit 2 LEED™ Accredited Professional 1 The Sheward Partnership

0 3 1 0 4 points

1 D Credit 1.1 LTc3: High Priority Site (2 point threshold) 1 The Sheward Partnership1 D Credit 1.2 LTc5: Access to Quality Transit (3 point threshold) 1 The Sheward Partnership

0 D Credit 1.3 SSc4: Rainwater Management (2 point threshold) 11 D Credit 1.4 WEc2: Indoor Water Use Reduction (2 point threshold) 1 The Sheward Partnership

0 D Credit 1.5 WEc3: Cooling Water Use Reduction (2 point threshold) 11 D Credit 1.6 MRc1: Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction 1 The Sheward Partnership

0 55 22 33 110 points(projects may lose between 2 to 4 points during certification)Certified 40 to 49 points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 60 to 79 points Platinum 80 points and above

Responsible Party for LEED-Online Documentation

Credit Type

Credit ID

Materials & Resources

Indoor Environmental Quality

Innovation

Regional Priority Credits: Per Building Address

Totals (Pre-Certification Estimates)

Hard Cost

Soft Cost