8/10/2019 4879.docx

1/7

IN THE COURT OF THE CITY CIVIL JUDGEAT BANGALORE (CCH-3)

O.S.NO. 4879/1988

Between

1.J.Ashwath Rao,

S/o Late.J Gopal Rao,Aged about 64 years,R/at. 88/1, I Floor,14thCross, Indira Nagar II Stage,Bangalore-560038.

2.J. Subha Rao,S/o Late. J Srinivasa Rao,Aged about 53 years

R/at No. 219, Mysore Bank Colony,B.S.K I Stage, Bangalore-560050. ..Plaintiffs

And

1.Sri. Muniswamy ReddySince deceased by his L.Rs:Smt. Muninagamma,W/o Late N. Muniswamy Reddy,

Aged about 75 years,R/at Chokkanahgalli ,Bangalore North Taluk. (Dead)

2.Muddappa Reddy,Since deceased by his LRs

2a) Smt. Chinnamma,W/o Late Muddappa Reddy,

Chokkanahalli, Jakkur Post,Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore

8/10/2019 4879.docx

2/7

2(b).Smt. Anusuya,

W/o. Lakshmana Reddy,D/o Late Muddappa Layout,5thBlock, KHB Colony,Bangalore.

2(c). Smt. Shanthamma,W/o Hanuantha Reddy,

D/o Late Muddappa Reddy,Harohalli, Suryanayakanahalli Post,Yelanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk.

2(d). Smt.Aruna,W/o. M. Rajendra Reddy,D/o. Late Muddappa Reddy,Jakkur Post, Malur Taluk, Kolar District.

2(e). Ramachandra Reddy, Major,S/o. Late Muddappa Reddy,R/at. Chokkanahalli Village, Yelahanka Hobli,Bangalore District.

2(f). M.Prasad Reddy,S/o.Late Muddappa ReddyHindu, Chokkanahalli,Jakkur Post, Yelahanka Hobli,Bangalore North Taluk.

3.Narayana Reddy,S/o Late Muninarasimha ReddyAged about 68 yearsR/at Chokkanahalli,Yelahanka Hobli,Bangalore North Taluk.

4.Sri. Ramalinga Reddy,

S/o. Muniswamy Reddy,Aged about 52 years,R/at Chokkanahalli,Yelahanka Hobli,Bangalore North Taluk.

8/10/2019 4879.docx

3/7

5.

Sri. Narasa Reddy,S/o. Muniswamy Reddy,Aged about 39 years,R/at Chokkanahalli,Yelahanka Hobli,Bangalore North Taluk.

6.Dr. B.S.N Hari,S/o. Late Satyanarayana Major

7.D. Ravishankar, S/o Kamosh, Major

Defendant No 6 and 7 both are Partners of M/s. Housing

& Land Development Corporation, No.473, 9thCross, Ist

Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore-560011.

(Suit against D-6 &D-7 dismissed as per Orders dt:

25/10/1997.)

8.

Smt. Shakuntalamma,W/o Late Nagareddy (Late)Aged about 42 years,R/at. Haranighatta Village,Kodiyanur Post,Malur, Kolar District.

9.Smt. Padmamma,

W/o Late Muninagareddy,Aged about 42 years,R/at. Chokkanahalli,Yelahanka Hobli,Bangalore North Taluk.

10. Jayarama Reddy,S/o Late. Munivenkata Reddy,Aged about 64 years, Chokkanahalli,

Yelahanka Hobli,Bangalore North Taluk.

8/10/2019 4879.docx

4/7

11.

Smt. Kanthamma,W/o Ramalingareddy,R/at Chokkanahalli,

Yelahanka Hobli,

Bangalore North Taluk ....Defendants

Name and address of the proposed

Impleading applicant

M.Parvathi ReddyState PresidentKarnataka Kanunu Samrakashana SamithiNo. 30, 5thMain, Next Adigas Hotel,Ganhinagar, Bangalore-560009

APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 23 RULE 3A R/W SECTION

151 OF CC OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

That for the reason sworn to in the accompanying affidavit

that this Honble court may be pleased to setaside the

compromise decree passed by this Honble court dated

31/03/2008 by responding the case in the interest of

justice and equity.

Bangalore Advocate for defendant

Date: 24/07/2014

8/10/2019 4879.docx

5/7

IN THE COURT OF THE CITY CIVIL JUDGEAT BANGALORE (CCH-3)

O.S.NO.4879/1988

Between

J. Ashwath Rao and another Plaintiffs

And

Muddappa Reddy and Another .Defendants.

AFFIDAVIT

I, M. Parvathi Reddy, D/o Late Muniyappa Reddy, Aged about 35

years R/at No.30, 5th Main, Next Adigas Hotel, Gandhinagar,

Bangalore-560009. Do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as

follows:

1.I Kumari M. Parvathi Reddy represents Karnataka Kanunu

Samrakshana Samithi, a registered organization under

Karnataka society act and I am well convercent with the facts

of the case which is I am deposing herein so I am swearing

this affidavit.

2. I state that the motto of our organization tries to protect the

law of Karnataka.

3.I state that the suit filed by the plaintiff on schedule property

for partition, but the suit schedule property is not at all

belongs to plaintiff neither defendants.

8/10/2019 4879.docx

6/7

4.

I state that the suit schedule property are belongs to

government. Our aim of the organization is to protect the

schedule property from the plaintiff and defendant and likes to

preserve the property for public purpose. To full fill the aim of

the organization it is necessary to implead our organization as

the defendant in the above said case.

5. I state that I have got a good case on merits. If this

application is not allowed, we will be put to irreparable loss,

hardship and injury and our rights in the schedule properties

will be jeopardized. On the other hand, no hardship will be

caused to the parties to the suit.

WHEREFORE, I Pray that this Honble court be pleased to

allow the accompanying application, as prayed for in the

interest of justice and equity.

I do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath that this is my

name and signature and the contents of this affidavit are true

and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and

belief.

Identified by me

Deponent

Advocate Sworn to before me

Bangalore

Date: 24:07:2014

8/10/2019 4879.docx

7/7